+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The evaluation p rocess

The evaluation p rocess

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: dong
View: 45 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The evaluation p rocess. Planning ( autumn 2009) 11 case studies (2010) Analysis and report ( spring 2011) Management Response ( autumn 2011) Develop new guidelines etc. (2012-). Central African Republic Cameroon India Guatemala Ethiopia Belarus Mongolia C ambodja - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
31
Transcript
Page 1: The  evaluation  p rocess
Page 2: The  evaluation  p rocess

The evaluation process

• Planning (autumn 2009)• 11 case studies (2010)• Analysis and report (spring 2011)• Management Response (autumn 2011)• Develop new guidelines etc. (2012-)

Page 3: The  evaluation  p rocess

Central African RepublicCameroon

IndiaGuatemala

EthiopiaBelarus

MongoliaCambodja

MaliBurkina Faso

China

Page 4: The  evaluation  p rocess

Learning within SMC, member organizations and partner organi-zations about how to apply the Rights Based Approach to development, with a special focus on gender equality.

Purpose:

Page 5: The  evaluation  p rocess

• What are the implications of different types of contexts for the application of the rights perspective (society, organization, rights holders)?

• How have the achieved results (or the failed results) been affected by the way in which the rights perspective has been applied? Which methods seem to have led to good results?

Page 6: The  evaluation  p rocess

- Or both?

Needs vs. Rights

Page 7: The  evaluation  p rocess

Mobilization and organization

Page 8: The  evaluation  p rocess

Mongolia

Page 9: The  evaluation  p rocess

Guatemala

Page 10: The  evaluation  p rocess

”Through collective action the awareness of rights seems not only to grow in an almost organic way, but also, when successful, to create the foundation from where rights holders can feel empowered to take action”

Page 11: The  evaluation  p rocess

Role models

Page 12: The  evaluation  p rocess

”When targeting the poorest/most marginalised people it could be difficult to move on from a pure service delivery role. Extremely disempowered people need more time and support to build up confidence, hope and assertiveness. In such contexts more deliberate efforts are needed in support of mobilization and organization of rights holders.”

Page 13: The  evaluation  p rocess

”It seems that results on both individual and organisational level are better in projects that have deliberately targeted and supported role models or change agents from the target group”

Page 14: The  evaluation  p rocess

Claiming rights of others

Page 15: The  evaluation  p rocess

“The limitations of a full implementation of the rights perspective due to extreme exclusion and marginalisation of individuals or groups that leads to lack of voice cannot be an argument for non-action. A rights-based approach should be applied as far as possible.”

“It is however clear that, although human rights are individual, the RBA allows legitimate representation in the processes towards their realisation. There is no conflict between representative democracy and human rights.”

Page 16: The  evaluation  p rocess

Legitimacy and representation

Page 17: The  evaluation  p rocess

”The local organisation or supported sub-groups have a human rights awareness/drive/ commitment of its own (staff, members, leaders) and is not only an intermediary or “administrator of cooperation funds”

Page 18: The  evaluation  p rocess

Gradual development of a Rights Based Approach

Page 19: The  evaluation  p rocess
Page 20: The  evaluation  p rocess

Central African Republic

Page 21: The  evaluation  p rocess
Page 22: The  evaluation  p rocess

Analysis of power and gender

Page 23: The  evaluation  p rocess

Intersectional approach

• Poor• Women• Boys• Young• Elderly• Homosexual• Hiv-positive• Disabled• Ethnic minorities

Page 24: The  evaluation  p rocess

• Why do children don’t have access to education?

• Why do boys and girls don’t have access to education?

Page 25: The  evaluation  p rocess

“equally strenghtened” “strenghtened to an equal level”

Men

Women

Decrease the power-gap

…then targeted actions that adresses structural causesare needed!

Page 26: The  evaluation  p rocess

Gender and power analysis1. In which way is there a difference between men and women when it comes to power, possibilities and rights? • How many are men/women among the target group? How many boys/girls?• What access do men and women have to the decision making structures in

the community? Do BOTH men and women have access to influence decisions?

• What access do men and women have to different community assets e.g. land, employment, access to loans and saving, education/knowledge, time etc.?

• Are there any particular challenges/problems related to gender equality in the community? E.g. FGM, violence against women, lack of inheritance rights, forced marriage etc.?

Page 27: The  evaluation  p rocess

Gender and power analysis2. What are the causes behind this? • Discrimination?• Social norms and behaviors?• Gender roles?• Traditional values?• Exclusion?• Legislation?• Duty bearers not fulfilling their obligations?

Page 28: The  evaluation  p rocess

Gender and power analysis3. How to close the power gap? • Plan for measures to close the gap!

4. Deal with the causes!• Challenge the norms through discussions, theatre• Cooperate with actors with gender expertise, e.g. FIDA Kenya• Advocacy work

Page 29: The  evaluation  p rocess

“But the men have not been approached to reflect on their willingness to share power. They are happy as long as the empowerment of women leads to increased household earnings or a healthier family. This is a so called functional empowerment of women; the focus is not on the rights of the women themselves. The women are rather seen as vehicle of development contributing to the rights of their children and relatives.”

Page 30: The  evaluation  p rocess

Based on what you have heard about gender and power, and your own experiences of that, write down three recommendations about what could be included in SMC’s guidelines.

Page 31: The  evaluation  p rocess

Based on what you have heard today in the presentations, and your own experiences, write down three recommendations about what could be included in SMC’s guidelines.

1. Working in challenging contexts2. Participation of vulnerable groups3. Gradual development of a Rights Based Approach/

Combining needs and rights.


Recommended