+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The fundamental principles of Service Systems construction Summary of PA116.

The fundamental principles of Service Systems construction Summary of PA116.

Date post: 01-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: elfrieda-wood
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
36
The fundamental principles of Service Systems construction Summary of PA116
Transcript

The fundamental principles of Service Systems

construction

Summary of PA116

Connection

01

ObjectCategory

Operation

R2

02

PR1

03

Rule

R3

04

R4

ci2item

r4

r2 r3

r1

Manifestation

CI-connection ContextItem

Category

RS DO

deta

il

R33

GB

S

R22

R02

estab

lishin

g fra

mewor

k

com

posi

te

R11

est a

blis

her

R01

fulfilling

lear

ner

covering

follo

wer

establishing flow framework

reac

hing

member flow -member

flow -organizer

colla

bora

tor

supe

rvis

or

auth

or

organizer

focus

ing

Goal

FlowAgent

Activity

Action

19 r05

r04

r03r06

r02

r01

M-co

mposi te

A-c

omp

osite

U-c

om

posi

te

C-c

om

posi

te

GB

SR

BS

SB

S

r33

r22

r11

18

17

16

15

14

12

6

5

4

3

21

Model

Agent

Service

Goal

ContextUse-case Requirement

19 r05

r04

r03r06

r02

r01

M-co

mposi te

A-c

ompo

site

U-c

ompo

site

C-c

ompo

site

GB

SR

BS

SB

S

r33

r22

r11

14

126

5

4

3

21

Model

Agent

Service

Goal

ContextUse-case Requirement

U-c

ompo

site

deta

il

R33

GB

S

R22

R02

estab

lishin

g fra

mewor

k

com

posi

te

R11

est a

blis

her

R01

fulfilling

lear

ner

covering

follo

wer

establishing flow framework

reac

hing

member flow -member

flow -organizer

colla

bora

tor

supe

rvis

or

auth

or

organizer

focus

ing

Goal

FlowAgent

Activity

Action

5

Connection

01

ObjectCategory

Operation

R2

02

PR1

03

Rule

R3

04

R4

manif2ci

base

manif2co

ntext

ci2ca

tegory

ci2item

r4

r2 r3

r1Manifestation

CI-connection ContextItem

Category

Duality of what to focus on and how to manage it

Two fundamental Diamonds

CONCEPTUAL MODELS

WHAT ?

HOW ?

6

Where does it end / begin ???

MENTION

USE

Self-reference

The double-funnel adaptive principle

• Synthesis of information from heterogeneous net of data sources

• Visualization of the synthesis result directly supporting decisions of an expert “now and in a given situation“

• Support of momentary knowledge utilization, not only the pre-prepared knowledge utilization

• ADAPTIVITY !!!

Knowledge Management means to keep the Nonaka-Takeushi

cycle in a run !

Knowledge

Tacit

Explicit

socialization

combination

externalization

internalization

10

CYBERSPACE

PHYSICAL WORLD

OBJECT“which is focused on”

CONCEPT (closed construction)

linguisticEXPRESSION

Strictlyempty

Extension/Intension Concept (closedconstruction)higher order object

reference in the real word at a specific time

represents

denotes identifies

Essence of communication, understanding, and modeling

Conceptual system

C1, …, Cm simple conceptsC1, …,Cm --- simple concepts (primitive concepts)

Cm+1, Cm+2, …

derived concepts

Relativity of primitive/derivedDOMAIN 1

p primitive concepts

DOMAIN 2

primitive concepts

If we see in a way a similarity,we use the same, already known,words. The nouns are variables “of type ”from the ramified hierarchy.

What is primitive withinone domain can be derivedin other domain.

What is primitive for anexpert can be derivedfor a beginner.

Conceptual system and its hierarchy of languages

C1, …, Cm simple concepts

C1, …,Cm --- simple concepts (primitive concepts)

L0CSi

Cm+1, Cm+2, …

derived concepts

Hierarchy of Languages

LjCSi

• NL is not something completed with fixed meanings of particular expressions.

• NL is a pool of particular hierarchies of languages over conceptual systems defining particular domains.

• NL is a dynamic phenomenon which develops continually.

Semantics of NL expressions is not something which exist as a

static phenomenon;

Semantics is a mapping:

(NL expressions, Domain) Concepts

Semantics is created within the domain cognition process !

17

Basic level in hierarchical taxonomy (once more)

• Our perception is anchored by our human dimension• The reason of this can be explained by:• Enactive Perception: “a dialogue” of the perceiving person and

the environment/neighbourhood

Superior level animal furniture

Basic level dog chair

Subordinate level Labrador rocking chair

Prototype Categorizing - result

• Select the ideal representative item• (This is the “invariant representation” of what we

call “category”)• Express the fact that item I belongs to category

C by connection (I, C) c– where c is measure of certainty

• Category is no more seen as a container, but it is seen as a hook (central member = prototype) to which we hang up other members

19

The “T”

20

manif2ci

base

manif2context

ci2category

ci2item

r4

r2 r3

r1

Manifestation

CI-connection ContextItem

Category

21

Data model of the Molten Objects data scheme

22

Connection oriented approach• The basics is: we store instances of

relationships not instances of previously determined complexes in a form of tables (from the beginning fixed)

• Principle of connection based perception of models Seeing a model of anything in a form of graph and thinking on this model we focus primarily on relationships (graph edges) not on objects (graph nodes).

• Let’s compare this with HIT method !!!

23

Specificaton of ADT (1)• Types

– G– STACK [G]

• Functions– put: STACK[G] G → STACK[G]– remove: STACK[G] → STACK[G]– item: STACK[G] → G– empty: STACK[G] → BOOL– new: _ → STACK[G]

• Axioms• Conditions

24

Specification of ADT (2)• Types

– G– STACK [G]

• Functions• Axioms

For any x::G, s::STACK[G]– A1. item(put(s,x))=x– A2. remove(put(s,x))=s– A3. empty(new)– A4. not empty(put(s,x))

• Conditions

OOP = one of the best inventions

• …an intelligent use of the “Fundamental hierarchy”

• … a reverse process to “Breakdown structures”

• … in a way a simulation of the natural process of “cognition by creation”

26

The Class in an OO analysis

• Class defines “the shape” of its instances• Each object, which is worth focusing

attention, must be assigned to a class.• Improper class selection “today” can

cause big problems “tomorrow”!• Situation change in real world causes

necessity to change the assignment of some objects to classes, or to change the class structure design.

27

Issues of OOP (1)• Object Oriented Paradigm works well in the

realm for which it was originally developed.

• This is Programming.

• The realm of “artifacts” creating.

• To mirror a realm of continual changes, improvements and developments doesn’t fit to OOP very well.

• This is Business Systems analysis and specification.

28

Communication through interface

XX

EMPLOYEEEMPLOYMENT_CONTRACT

HRM

PRODUCTION XX

DEVICEWORK-PLACE

where is the given

operating given

of given

XLICENCE

((

of given

XCAPABILITY

))for given

Communication via “Deputies”

XX

EMPLOYEEEMPLOYMENT_CONTRACT

HRM

PRODUCTION XX

DEVICEWORK_PLACE

where is the given

operating given

of given

XLICENCE

((

of given

XCAPABILITY

))for given

X DEPUTY-EMPLOYEE

Usually asynchronous update

Mother component for EMPLOYEE

30

Categorization of DM objectsThe root of the Tree

DM object

Entity

Relationship

Artefact/Thing Process Event

Semanticrelationship

WeekSemanticrelationship

SupertypeSubtyperelationship

Container

31

Connections between Supertypes

Device

Cca 180 – 220 Transformer

Electricaldistributor

Pillar

Lightningarrester

Bulk power substation

Switchboard

Cable

32

Using glases

Device

Device Type Glasses

1,1

0,M

1,1 0,M

DEVICE

xxxxx *xxx * xxxxxxxxxxxx *xx * xxxxxxxxx * x *

33

Using attribute as isolated entity

Device

Device Type Attribute

1,1

0,M

1,1 0,M

Valuep

p

(1,M)

(Value) of given (#Attribute) for given (#Device) / 0,1:0,M

34

Abstraction of relationships

marriage WomanMan

date maiden namenamesurname

1 * * 1

Person Familyrelationship

Type offamily

relationship

*1

*1

*

1

35

Analytic pattern Accountabilityby Lubor Šešera, DATASEM'99

Region ofsales

Product typeResource type QuantityType ofhealth

care

1..*

Person Post Organization

Operational level

Knowledge level

supertype

subtype

to whom 1+

ParticipantAccountability

type typeswho 1+

Scope{abstract}

Place

Scope ofhealthcare

Scope ofresources

to whom

Type ofAccountability

Period

who

Type ofParticipant

type

* 10..1

*

1

*

1

*

1*1

*

*

1

*

*1

* *

* *

* 1

* 1

1

*

*

*

The purpose of Mind Model is completely exact, rigorous

expression of a part of reality which seems to be unexpressible

to most of people !

What is the content of the modelor

what the model expresses


Recommended