Date post: | 22-Nov-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | sam-morris |
View: | 110 times |
Download: | 4 times |
GSS 1
Running Head: The General Social Survey (GSS)
Samuel R. Morris
The General Social Survey (GSS)
SOWK 300
Tuskegee University
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
GSS 2
Hypothesis: My first hypothesis for this paper is a person’s race can affect their level of
happiness. The independent variable for this project is happy and the dependent variable is race.
Under the independent variable, the values that I used were very happy, pretty happy, not too
happy, and other. Under the dependent variables, the values that I used were Black, White, and
Other. For this project, my control variable was Sex.
Under my control variable, the values that I used were male, female and other.. I used
my control variable to establish my second hypothesis for this project – my multivariate
hypothesis. My second hypothesis is one’s sex and race can affect their level of happiness. The
control variable will affect the first hypothesis in a significant way because men and women
operate differently. It will be very interesting to see how these variables respond to the recorded
data.
Rationale: Everyone is this world wants to be happy. They want to be filled with some type of
joy that keeps them warm at night; however, for some that is not the case. Throughout American
history, people’s levels of happiness have varied throughout for different reasons. There have
been many studies that have tried to analyze people’s levels of happiness and I intend on doing
the same.
In this project, I will be only looking at the year 2000 so my findings cannot speak for
every American. I decided to look at this aspect of America because people’s behaviors tend to
vary, especially when they are happy or not. Moreover, it will allow me understand people on a
deeper level. As stated before, I understand that because I am only looking at one year (2000)
my findings will be slanted. Nevertheless, I am excited to see how these results will turn out.
GSS 3
Results:
Bivariate Table
Table 1
Race by Level of Happiness of R (%)
______________________________________________________________________________
R’s Level of Happiness
______________________________________________________________________________
Level of Happiness Very Happy Pretty Happy Not Too Happy Other Total
Black 93.9% 68.1% 61.5% 76.9% 75.0%
White 6.1% 27.5% 30.8% 23.1% 21.9%
Totals 100 100 100 100 100
(N) (33) (66) (12) (13) (124)
______________________________________________________________________________
Source: The General Social Survey (GSS)
GSS 4
Multivariate Table
Table 2
Race by Level of Happiness of R (%)
Controlling for R’s Sex
______________________________________________________________________________
R’s Level of Happiness
______________________________________________________________________________
Level of Happiness Very Happy Pretty Happy Not Too Happy Other Total
______________________________________________________________________________
Male Respondents
Black 100% 78.1% 83.3% 100% 85.5%
White .0% 21.9% 16.7% .0% 14.5%
Totals 100 100 100 100 100
(N) (14) (32) (6) (3) (55)
______________________________________________________________________________
Female Respondents
Black 89.5% 59.5% 42.9% 70.0% 67.1%
White 10.5% 32.4% 42.9% 30.0% 27.4%
Totals 100 100 100 100 100
(N) (19) (34) (6) (10) (69)
______________________________________________________________________________
Source: The General Social Survey (GSS)
GSS 5
Discussion: Everyone wants and deserves some type of happiness. When I originally started
this project, I expected to see certain things; however, I was mistaken and shocked. On my first
hypothesis, I predicted that a person’s race would have affect on their level of happiness. For
purposes of this analysis, we will just focus on the first three variables. “Other” is classified as
either missing or no information. The first thing that shocked me was that Black people were
happier than White people. 93.9% of the Black respondents were very happy versus 6.1% of
White respondents. Nevertheless, 61.5% of the Black respondents were not too happy versus
23.1% of White respondents. These findings shocked me because although there was a high
percentage of Blacks that were happy in 2000, there were still a high number of them that was
not.
My second hypothesis focused on the same aspect controlling for the respondent’s sex.
These findings also proved to shock me even more than the bivariate findings. The findings
proved that Black Men (100%) were happier than Black Women (89.5%); however, White
Women (10.5%) were happier than White Men (.0%). After looking at these results, it puzzled
me why there was no numerical value for White Men. I concluded that maybe they did not
respond throughout the survey.
These findings were very interesting. My hypotheses were proven correct, but I was very
shocked from the findings. I expected to see that there were more White people happier than
Black people were, but I was proven wrong. I was ecstatic to see that Blacks, in 2000, were
happy with their lives and what they were doing. The year 2000 was a year of great prosperity
and based on my findings, Blacks were really enjoying life and what it had to offer.
GSS 6
Appendix
GSS 7
GSS 8
GSS 9
GSS 10
GSS 11
Syntax File
DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1.
STRING HAPPY2 (A8).
RECODE HAPPY (1='1') (2='2') (3='3') (ELSE='5') INTO HAPPY2.
VARIABLE LABELS HAPPY2 'LEVEL OF HAPPINESS'.
EXECUTE.
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=RACE BY HAPPY2
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ GAMMA
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=RACE BY HAPPY2 BY SEX
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ GAMMA
/CELLS=COUNT COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.
GSS 12
Codebook
Independent Variable: Race
Label: Respondent’s Race
1 = Black
2 = White
3 = Other
Dependent Variable: Happy2
Label: Level of Happiness
1 = Very Happy
2 = Pretty Happy
3 = Not too Happy
8 = Other
Control Variable: Sex
Label: Respondent’s Sex
1 = Male
2 = Female
3 = Other