+ All Categories
Home > Technology > The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Date post: 27-Jan-2015
Category:
Upload: optimal-experience
View: 703 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Kris and Michael attended and presented at Designing for Mobility in Melbourne, March 2013.
Popular Tags:
53
The good, the bad and the ugly: Mobile Banking in New Zealand Kris Nygren & Michael Dutton Designing for Mobility 2013 Melbourne
Transcript
Page 1: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

The good, the bad and the ugly: Mobile Banking in New ZealandKris Nygren & Michael Dutton

Designing for Mobility 2013

Melbourne

Page 2: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Some of us…20 UX consultants and designers in Auckland and Wellington

Page 3: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Disclaimer (and credentials!) – we have worked with most New Zealand banks on more than 100 projects

Page 4: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

http://services.google.com/fh/files/blogs/our_mobile_planet_new_zealand_en.pdf

TNS Mobile Life study (New Zealand) 2012

Mobile and mobile banking were hot trends in NZ in 2012 (penetration:)

Page 5: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Google Analytics

Banking (NZ)

Mobile banking (NZ)

Google search trends told the same story:

Page 6: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

By mid-2012 it was like a mad race with New Zealand banks announcing new mobile banking offerings on a weekly basis!

Page 7: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

But lets step back and look at the bigger picture…

Page 8: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

6 billion mobile connections

1.2 billion mobile web users

1 billion smartphone handsets

Global mobile stats in 2012…

http://mobithinking.com/mobile-marketing-tools/latest-mobile-stats/a#subscribershttp://mobithinking.com/mobile-marketing-tools/latest-mobile-stats/a#smartphonepenetration

Page 9: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Pop Quiz!

Rank Country Subscribers(millions)

1 China 1,1002 India 6993 USA 3224 ? 2605 Brazil 2596 Russia 2277 Japan 1288 ? 1209 Germany 11410 ? 107

http://mobithinking.com/mobile-marketing-tools/latest-mobile-stats/a#chinasubs

Where is mobile growing?

Page 10: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Pop Quiz!

Rank Country Subscribers(millions)

1 China 1,1002 India 6993 USA 3224 Indonesia 2605 Brazil 2596 Russia 2277 Japan 1288 Pakistan 1209 Germany 11410 Nigeria 107

http://mobithinking.com/mobile-marketing-tools/latest-mobile-stats/a#chinasubs

Where is mobile growing?

Page 11: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

2009

What about growth in mobile banking?

2013 2015

55m

550m

1.1bn

http://www.berginsight.com/News.aspx?m_m=6&s_m=1

+2000%

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/02/prweb3553494.htm

http://www.ababj.com/tech-topics-plus/m-banking-530-million-users-by-2013-2695.html

Page 12: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

http://mobithinking.com/

blog/china-top-mobile-market

China 2012:>1 billion mobile subs>400m mobile web users

Page 13: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

http://mobithinking.com/banking-the-unbanked

The global trend is for “un-banked” and “under-banked” consumer segments driving the growth in mobile banking

Page 14: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Pop Quiz!

This country has 29 million mobile subscribers.

65% (19 million) use mobile money services.

Where am I?

Q:

A:http://www.cck.go.ke/resc/statcs.html

Page 15: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Pop Quiz!

This country has 29 million mobile subscribers.

65% (19 million) use mobile money services.

Where am I?

Q:

A: Kenyahttp://www.cck.go.ke/resc/statcs.html

Page 16: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

And it turns out it’s the same trend in the US as in China, India and Kenya….

Page 17: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

The “unbanked” and “underbanked” are key to growth – adoption among younger, minorities, lower income segments are driving growth in the US

Page 18: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

?But the question we really wanted to answer…

who provides the BEST mobile banking experience in New Zealand?

Page 19: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

So, UX consultancies regularly study the usability of internet and mobile banking…

Page 20: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

…and there is a plethora of mobile banking “awards”

Page 21: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

…and sometimes its just one guy’s opinion!

Page 22: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

So we asked ourselves - as UX researchers and designers - if we were to evaluate mobile banking offerings as objectively and scientifically as possible, …how would we do it?

Page 23: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

This is how. Evaluate each offering against 5 core criteria:

Page 24: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Usability

Interaction design

FeaturesUser ratings

Platforms

We assessed all New Zealand banks (and US giant) and plotted them on a pentagon spider-diagram

Page 25: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Usability

Interaction design

FeaturesUser ratings

Platforms

Big graph area = good

Page 26: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Usability

Interaction design

FeaturesUser ratings

Platforms

Small graph area = bad

Page 27: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Before we start, however, it’s important to understand the relative size and resources of the banks we evaluated…

TSB Bank ~$200m revenue

JP Morgan Chase $100bn+ revenue

Page 28: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

FeaturesUser ratings

Platforms

We started with some secondary research – looking at publically available data

Page 29: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

iPhone Y Y Y Y Y Y y y

iPad N Y N N N N y y

Android Y Y Y Y Y N y y

Windows Y N N N N N y N

Open accounts N N Y N N Y N N

No log-in balances Y Y Y N N N N N

4/5 digit log-in Y N Y Y Y N N Y

View account balances Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

View transaction lists Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Transfer between accounts Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Bill payment Y Y Y N Y Y Y N

Set up payees - From Mobile N N N N N Y Y N

View automatic payments N Y Y N Y Y N Y

Change upcoming payments N N Y N Y y N N

View term deposits Y Y Y N Y y N N

View mortgages & loans Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y

View KiwiSaver Y N N N N N N N

Pay tax N N N N Y Y N N

Alerts: Text N N N N N Y Y N

Push N N N N N Y Y Y

Email N N N N N Y Y N

Foreign exchange, rates etc. Y N N N Y Y N N

Share trading N N N N N N N y

NFC N N N N N y N N

Location based services Y N Y N N N Y Y

Pay to mobile Y N N Y N Y N Y

Pay TradeMe sellers Y N Y N N N N N

Pay to Facebook friends Y N N N N N N N

Personalise account N N N N N Y N N

Personalised service N N N N Y N N N

Picture cheque deposits N N N N N N Y N

Loyality scheme points Y n N N N N Y N

Secure Messaging Y N N N Y Y N N

App store - latest version 4.53 3.33 4.55 1.82 4.35 4.45 2.34 2.19

App store - all versions 3.31 1.87 4.16 1.82 4.35 4.45 3.49 3.00

Google play 3.94 2.93 4.50 3.93 4.35 4.24 3.92Ratin

gFu

nctio

nalit

yPl

atfor

m

It turned into this heat-map…

Page 30: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Features

How many is enough?

How many

is too

many?

We looked closely at the features provided – both core and non-core

Page 31: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.
Page 32: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Here is how they ranked on features…tiny TSB at the top!

Page 33: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

User ratings

Next we looked at the user rating in the app stores (which must be taken with a grain of salt…)

Page 34: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

And there were some clear winners and losers

Page 35: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Platforms

Finally, we looked at how many platforms banks make their mobile offering available on

Page 36: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Revealing a wide spread with TSB and ANZ potentially excluding a large part of their customer base

Page 37: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Usability

What to

test? Who:

Millennials

Where?

Method

As UX consultants, we believe that comprehensive usability testing was critical to a robust evaluation

Page 38: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

…so we recruited real bank customers and tested all the mobile banking apps in our specialist mobile user testing lab in Auckland and Wellington

Page 39: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

In

Action!

Page 40: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Big gap between the best and the worst…and as expected, a strong (inverse) relationship between usability issues and

SUS (system usability score)

Page 41: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

On balance, Westpac and ASB provided the most ‘usable’ UI

Page 42: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Interaction design

Finally, we asked five UX consultants and interaction designers to assess how well designed each mobile

banking app was

Page 43: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

We created a robust evaluation framework, which enabled independent assessment and scoring of each banking app

Page 44: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

And yet again, it revealed a big gap between the top and bottom performers

Page 45: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

We didn’t feel all criteria were equally important, so we weighted them to emphasise the most important aspects

Page 46: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

?So, how did they all stack up?

Page 47: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

This should start to give you a picture…

Page 48: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Usability

Interaction design

FeaturesUser ratings

Platforms

56.01

In the end, ANZ achieved the lowest score due to a lack of features, few platforms and poor user ratings

Page 49: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Usability

Interaction design

FeaturesUser ratings

Platforms

77.83

ASB, by contrast achieved strong scores across all criteria

Page 50: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Usability

Interaction design

FeaturesUser ratings

Platforms

74.86

In fact, giant US Bank JP Morgan Chase (often held up as a benchmark in mobile banking) came in second to ASB

Page 51: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

77.8374.86 68.83 67.35Scores:

Page 52: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Finally, some key insights from this study…

• Is “feature bloat” a problem in terms of mobile banking UX? Not if the app is well designed.

• It’s really hard to measure good design!

• Good mobile usability and features can make people switch banks!

• Americans still use cheques!

• And, these findings are already out of date…

Page 53: The good, bad and the ugly. Mobile banking in NZ. Designing for mobility.

Recommended