+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: franccortez
View: 232 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 22

Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    1/22

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    2/22

    Even before their contact with Western

    cultures, Filipinos already had an alphabet,

    some mathematics, a calendar, and a system

    of weights and measures. They were engagedin rice farming, fishing, and the mining of

    gold. Medicine based on local herbs was

    practiced. Small boats and ships up to 2,000

    tons were being constructed out of logs.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    3/22

    The Spaniards introduced the manufacture of lime,

    cement,

    and bricks and

    the use of concrete materials. Primary education was started by the Spanishmissionaries in 1565.

    There were about a thousand of these parish primaryschools by the end of the sixteenth century.

    The Spaniards also started higher education in as

    early as 1597 with the establishment of the Colegiode Cebu (now the University of San Carlos), and theUniversity of Santo Tomas opened in 1611.

    Admissions to these schools were limited to a selectfew.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    4/22

    The emphasis in the church schools was on

    classical learning, specifically Latin, Greek,

    philosophy, the humanities, and law.

    Although medicine and pharmacy were taught,

    the natural sciences and engineering were

    generally neglected.

    The educational system, primarily based on the

    propagation of Roman Catholicism, did not foster

    a scientific tradition of scholarship.

    On the contrary, it reinforced the superstitious,

    pre-scientific outlook of the existing folk beliefs.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    5/22

    The teaching of science was disdained and

    Filipino students were discouraged from its

    pursuit.

    The emphasis was on rote learning. The objective of the lesson, for example,

    was not to teach physics, but to convince

    Filipino students that they were incapable of

    learning physics. Yet the Spanish systemproduced Filipinos whose liberal education

    was comparable to that of the graduates of

    European universities.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    6/22

    In the Spanish colonial period, the cultivation

    of sugar and coconuts was started, and to

    support these activities the first agricultural

    school was established in Manila in 1861.Since then, sugar and coconuts have become

    the prominent elements of the Philippine

    economy.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    7/22

    The significant change during the Americancolonial period (18981946) was theestablishment of an alternative to sectarianeducation.

    A department of Public Instruction was created.American teachers were imported, and Englishwas used as a medium of instruction.

    In 1901, a Bureau of Government Laboratories(now the National Institute of Science andTechnology) was established and concerned itself

    initially with activities related to chemistry andtropical diseases. In 1908, the first stateuniversity, the University of the Philippines (UP)was established.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    8/22

    In the following year, 1909, the College of

    Agriculture was set up in Los Banos. In 1910,

    the College of Medicine was organized from

    the already existing Philippine MedicalSchool.

    In 1926, scientific research was started at

    the College of Veterinary Medicine, and the

    School of Hygiene and Public Health wasadded to the University of the Philippines.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    9/22

    It is interesting to note that, as in the Spanishperiod, the focus of the American period wasalso on agriculture and the medical sciences.

    Industrial technology was initially relegated tothe vocational level at the Philippine School ofArts and Trades.

    This bias is also reflected in the emergence ofscientific periodicals.

    The Philippine Agricultural Reviewwas firstpublished in 1908, whereas the UP Natural and

    Applied Science Bulletin was started 22 yearslater.

    Even today, there are no specialized journals inphysics. The history of the formation of scientificsocieties also reflects this uneven development.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    10/22

    The Philippine Medical Society was organized

    in 1901 while the Philippine Society of Civil

    Engineers was formed only in 1933.

    The early bias towards agriculture andmedical sciences was also prominent in the

    manpower training programme.

    The Philippines was effectively transformed

    into an exporter of agricultural products andraw materials and an importer of

    manufactured goods.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    11/22

    This hindered the emergence of economic self-reliance and industrialization.

    There was practically no demand for researchengineers and physical scientists.

    The emphasis was on agricultural and medicalresearch.

    The momentum of this colonial policy hascontinued up to the present.

    Caoili points out that factors associated with this

    colonial condition resulted in the cultivation ofFilipino tastes for American brands and products.

    Cultural imperialism also critically influencedthe outlook of the nascent Filipino scientificcommunity.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    12/22

    In 1934, the American colonial government

    sanctioned the formation of the National

    Research Council of the Philippines, which

    was patterned after American models. Filipino scientists and their research were

    more relevant to the American condition,

    since the US was where they obtained their

    training and where their peers resided. Beyond the social effects of colonialism, the

    impact on the industrialization process itself

    has been profound.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    13/22

    As Yoshihara points out,4 the entrepreneurial

    class in the Philippines dramatizes its

    colonial origins.

    Only one-third of entrepreneurs today arenative Filipinos, the other two-thirds being

    mostly foreigners.

    Even during the early years of independence,

    Philippine industries were dominated by theAmericans.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    14/22

    After the end of direct American rule in

    1946, the uneven development of S&T in the

    Philippines continued.

    Most of the scientific organizationsestablished by the independent Philippine

    government were also predominantly

    agriculture-based.

    The physical sciences, engineering, andmathematics continued to be neglected.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    15/22

    In 1956, a National Science Board wasestablished by Republic Act 1606 to promotescientific, engineering, and technologicalresearch. In the same year, the Chairman of theSenate Committee on Scientific Advancement

    submitted a "Report on the Status of Science inthe Philippines" to the President.

    Among other things, it recommended "an all-outfinancial support of scientific work and theestablishment of a coordinating agency to handle

    scientific matters." This gave birth to theScience Act of 1958 (Republic Act 1067), whichabolished the newly established National ScienceBoard and created the National ScienceDevelopment Board (NSDB).

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    16/22

    As reflected in the expenditures for R&D, the

    emphasis continued to be on agriculture and

    medicine, which accounted for more than half of

    all R&D funds.

    Basic research in the physical sciences was given

    something like 1-3 per cent of the total R&D

    budget, and applied industrial research about 5-

    15 per cent.

    According to NSDB figures for the 1960s, therewere more physical scientists and engineers

    engaged in R&D, together constituting about 68

    per cent of the total R&D workers

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    17/22

    Life scientists (including medical and

    agriculture) were only about 15 per cent of

    the total. Thus, R&D expenditures were also

    biased in favour of agriculture and medicine.

    The year 1968 is significant in the history of

    S&T in the Philippines.

    Presidential Proclamation No. 376 provided

    NSDB with a 35.6 hectare area in Bicutan tohouse the future Bicutan Science Community,

    consisting of research laboratories, pilot

    plants, science museum, etc.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    18/22

    Moreover, the Congress of the Philippinespassed Republic Act 5448, which imposednew taxes for a Special Science Fund tofinance scientific activities for the next five

    years. In the early 1970s, NSDB's principal concern

    was the infrastructural development of thescience community.

    Most of the Special Science Fund was usedfor construction of the buildings of theNational Science and Technology Authority(NSTA) and the other institutions.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    19/22

    The gross national expenditure for S&T for the period1970-1975 varied from 0.21 to about 0.48 per cent ofthe GNP. Almost one-half of the research grants wentto the University of the Philippines (UP). Thesignificant developments in this decade were the

    establishment of the Philippine Council forAgriculture and Resources Research

    (PCARR) and the Technology Resource Centre (TRC).PCARR became the effective research coordinatingmechanism in the agricultural sector, resulting inmore efficiency in the allocation of resources.

    This further strengthened the already dominant roleof agriculture. The creation of TRC outside the orbitof NSDB was only the beginning of the dismantlingand weakening of NSDB's monolithic hold onPhilippine S&T.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    20/22

    In this period, the Metals Industry Research and

    Development Centre and the Philippine Textile

    Research Institute were transferred from the

    NSDB to the Ministry of Trade and Industry.

    The National Computer Centre was established

    under the Ministry of National Defense.

    The TRC operates a technobank and a

    computerized database connected to foreign and

    local databases.

    The NSDB was pre-empted by others in the new

    and vital information technologies.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    21/22

    In 1982, NSDB was reorganized into a NationalScience and Technology Authority (NSTA) withfour sectoral councils patterned after PCARR.

    In spite of this, however, NSTA was outside the

    mainstream of the Philippine industrializationprogramme.

    The Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) wassupervising the Technology Transfer Board andthe establishment of the country's major

    industrial projects. On the other hand, the TRC was implementing

    the so-called Technology Utilization of Energyunder the Philippine National Oil Company.

  • 7/31/2019 The Historical Roots of Technological Dependence

    22/22

    The control of MTI and TRC was in the hands

    of non-scientists.

    The management of S&T development in the

    Philippines was fragmented among variousagencies.

    In spite of the transformation of the NSDB

    into an NSTA, it has, in fact, been

    considerably weakened by the loss of controlover some of the important elements of

    national S&T development.


Recommended