Date post: | 09-May-2015 |
Category: |
Business |
Upload: | marcus-evans |
View: | 4,651 times |
Download: | 5 times |
The Importance of Developing a Global Regulatory Strategy
Towards the Goal of RegistrationCarlos Langezaal, PhD
Director, Global Regulatory AffairsEisai, Inc.
11DRUGDRUG
10 GO 10 GO INTO INTO MANMAN
100 INTO 100 INTO DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT
1000 SCREENED 1000 SCREENED FOR ACTIVITYFOR ACTIVITY
10000 COMPOUNDS10000 COMPOUNDS
From Compound to Drug
10 - 12 Years
$7500-3000M
New Drug Development Process and Strategy
Pre-ClinicalResearch
SynthesisandPurification
IND /CTA
NDA /MAAClinical
ResearchPost-
Marketing
AnimalTesting
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Accelerated Approval
Potential Regulatory Meetings
Phase 4
PMRs
REMS / PSUR
Regulatory Affairs and the Product Life Cycle
Renewal
Variations
Advertisi
ng
Approval / Cleared
Submit MAA/NDA
Regulatory Questions
MAA/NDA
Approval
CTA/INDExtensions/
Updates
CTA/IND
Pharmacovigilance
Advice on Product Development
Regulatory Input into Development Life- cycle
manage-ment
File & Launch
Phase III
PoC to commit
to Phase III
FTIH to PoC
Candidate selection to FTIH
Lead to Candidate
Targetto
Lead
Gene - Function - Target Association
Disease selection
Target family selection
Prior to First Time in HumanWhat do the animal data tell us?
Do we need to amend our target group on the basis of toxicity findings?
Prior to First Time in HumanWhat do the animal data tell us?
Do we need to amend our target group on the basis of toxicity findings?
Initial Product ProfileWhat studies will be needed?
What are the issues we need to discuss with regulatory authorities?
Initial Product ProfileWhat studies will be needed?
What are the issues we need to discuss with regulatory authorities? Prior to Large Scale Clinical Trials
Have we agreed our development plan with Regulators?
Does the trial design meet regulatory/clinical end points?
Prior to Large Scale Clinical TrialsHave we agreed our development plan
with Regulators?Does the trial design meet
regulatory/clinical end points?
Prior to SubmissionDoes the data support the proposed
labeling?What can we learn from
competitor’s experiences?
Prior to SubmissionDoes the data support the proposed
labeling?What can we learn from
competitor’s experiences?
How do we maximize life cycle management? How do we maximize
life cycle management?Following Initial Opportunity AssessmentWhat lessons can we learn from previous
development projects?
Following Initial Opportunity AssessmentWhat lessons can we learn from previous
development projects?
Three phases of regulating products
• IND / CTA phase• Licensure phase• Post licensure phase
Regulation of Clinical Research in the US
IND
StartClinical Program Clinical Hold
30 Days
Other considerations:• Pre-IND meeting
IND Format and Content
• Provide technical information for adequate evaluation to support proposed clinical investigation– Cover letter, introduction, agreements– CMC information– General Investigational Plan, IB and Protocol– Pharmacology and Toxicology data– Any previous human experience
• Provide information on proposed clinical program• CTD format vs “old” format
Regulation of Clinical Research in Europe
• Includes all clinical trials in the EU• Describes a single harmonized process across
all EU member states – Clinical Trial Directive– Individual member states can implement the
Directive slightly differently
Timelines• CTA approvals:– allowed up to 60 days with one clock stop – as a
notification– requires written approval for biotech (60 days)
• In practice timings vary considerably e.g.:– Belgium 28 days– France, Ireland, Sweden, UK 30 days– Netherlands 49 days
• Phase I Studies– Belgium 15 days, France 14 days, Germany 20 days,
Netherlands 21 days, UK 14 – 21 days
CTAs – Format of Applications (1/2)
• Eudract Number • Application Form• Clinical Protocol– Describing in detail the objectives of the trial and
how it will be conducted• Investigators Brochure (IB)– Information on the drug that is critical to the
Investigator (e.g. results of previous studies, marketing status)
CTAs – Format of Applications (2/2)
• Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier (IMPD)– Summary of Quality – information on trial material
and how it is manufactured and controlled– Summary of Safety – information on safety studies
undertaken on the trial product– Efficacy – summary of human studies to date
• Manufacturer’s Authorization for Investigational Medicinal Products (GMP)– Manufacture outside EU - must be released by EU QP
• Examples of labeling
CTA End of Trial Notifications and Reports
• End of trial notifications – national and global reports are required within 90 days of last patient visit
• End of trial reports required within 1 year of completion
The Application
• US: New Drug Application (NDA)• EU: Marketing Authorisation
Application (MAA)• Japan: JNDA
• Format– (e)CTD format in 3 ICH regions–Other regions: national (e)CTD derivatives
NDA / MAA / JNDAThe application includes• Regional documentation (CTD Module 1)• Summaries of CMC, non-clinical and clinical (Module 2)• The drug's test results (Modules 3, 4 & 5)– CMC (CTD Module 3) includes Manufacturing information
to demonstrate proper manufacture of the drug– non-clinical (CTD Module 4)– clinical (CTD Module 5)
• Proposed label. The label provides:– necessary information about the drug, including uses for
which it has been shown to be effective, possible risks, and how to use it
US Approval Routes• NDA – 505(b)(1) Traditional– 505(b)(2) New route/form. for patented drug– ANDA Generic
• BLA (NDA for biologics)
• DEVICES– PMA (NDA equivalent)– 510(k) Based on predicates (features approved) and
NSUR (No Significant Use Risk)
US Timelines and speeding access to important new therapies
• Standard Review – 10 Months (PDUFA)• Priority Review – 6 Months (given to drugs that offer major
advances in treatment, or provide a treatment where no adequate therapy exists)
• Fast track - process designed to facilitate the development, and expedite the review of drugs to treat serious diseases and fill an unmet medical need – includes eligibility for Accelerated Approval and Rolling
Review• Accelerated Approval regulation - allowing earlier approval of
drugs to treat serious diseases, and that fill an unmet medical need based on a surrogate endpoint. Condition that post marketing clinical trials verify the anticipated clinical benefit
EU Application Procedures3 European Procedures• Centralised
– one application to the central EMA allows marketing everywhere in the EU
• Mutual Recognition– an approval in one country is ‘mutually recognised’ in a number
of other EU member states• Decentralised Procedure
– an assessment is carried out by one country – this is discussed and agreed by a number of other EU member states
Need for agreed PIP prior to EU MAA submission
National Procedures in individual countries
Centralised ProcedureKey Points
• One Dossier for the whole EU• Submitted to EMA and the CHMP members• Appointment of Rapporteur/Co-Rapporteur– CHMP members from 2 countries to perform “lead
assessment”• One evaluation period leading to a one EU-wide MA in 27 MS
(+ linking National Licences in Norway/Iceland)• Application review and maintenance all handled by the EMA• National Agencies through CHMP members have opportunity
to ask questions/comment on application
Centralised Procedure - Applicability
• Compulsory for – Biotechnology products – designated Orphan Medicinal Products – drugs for treatment of AIDS– Cancer– Neuro-degenerative disorders – Diabetes– Auto Immune diseases– Viral diseases
• Optional– New Active Substance– Significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation or that the
granting of authorisation is in the interest of patients– Generics / Hybrids of Centrally Authorised products– Duplicate licences of Centrally Authorised products
Submission of MAA
• Date of submission agreed between applicant and EMA in relation to published Target submission dates (www.ema.eu.int/)
• Explicit guidelines, but get confirmation in pre-submission meeting(s)– 1 Jan 10: e-CTD MAAs mandatory
• Dossier to be submitted in parallel to Rap/Co-Rap
Deciding your filing strategy
• Elegibility/compulsory Centralized Procedure• Commercial Considerations, market
accessibility• One centralized license vs individual licenses
(Filing only in certain countries)• Data protection
EU Timelines and speeding access to important new therapies
• Review: 210 days (+3 months Commission decision)
• Accelerated evaluation: 150 daysGuidance: EMEA/419127/2005
• Scientific AdviceGuidance: EMEA/4260/01
• Orphan designationRegulation (EC) No 141/2000
Post Authorization Activities
• Post Licensing commitments (US & EU)• Amendments to Marketing Authorisations
(MAs) (EU)/ Amendments to NDA / Supplements to NDA (US)• Renewals (EU)• Annual Reports (US)• PSURs (EU)• RMP / REMS
Develop Regulatory Strategy
• Think Globally
• Start early and fine tune during development