The importance of
Place Analysis in the design process
Place Alliance Summer School 2017Day 1 - studio | REAL
Hello!
• Annemarie de Boom
• studio | REAL
The design process
Site selection
Brief
Site & context analysis
Constraints & opportunities
Masterplan
Design code
Policy context
• Site and context = place analysis
• Each step informs the next
• Feedback loops required; place analysis should inform brief and site selection and policy
Designframework
DAY 1
DAY 2
DAY 3
Why analysis?
Good development:
• Responds to site conditions• Physical constraints
• Identity and character
• Enhances character, quality and function of the wider area
• Site development vs extending and repairing towns
An example
• High quality architecture
• Some good internal streets
But…• Isolated from
surroundings• No benefits to
surrounding communities
An example
• Rigid grid structure:• Poor connections• Awkward interface
with surrounding buildings
• Small and fragmented spaces
An example
• Analysis of surrounding area found network of paths and spaces
• Extend and connect through site
• Same volume of development
• Stronger identity focus around central green
• Eliminate poor interfaces and..
• Community-wide benefits
An example…
• Planning consent
An example
TopographyWaterways
Trees and woodland
Listed buildings
Building heights and massing
Density
Ecology
Street hierarchy
Access
Surrounding land uses
Ground conditions
Microclimate
Community infrastructure
Urban formMaterials
Public transport
Footpaths and cycleways
Archaeology
Planning context
Building style
Site locationNeighbourhood structure
Community views
Demographics
Socio-economics
Property market
Utilities
Historical development
Landmarks
Views
Local vernacular
Fronts and backs
Barriers
What to analyse?
SITECONTEXT
A bit of theory…
• Layers of a place• Natural landscape
• Connections
• Buildings
• Use
• Inter-relation between layers = responsive design > sense of place
Organising your analysis
Landscape
TopographyTrees and woodlandsWaterwaysEcologyGround conditionsMicroclimateEtc…
Movement & infrastructure
Road hierarchy Foot and cycle pathsAccess pointsBarriersPublic transportUtilities and infrastructureEtc…
Built form
Development pattern (morphology)
Urban form (figure ground)Fronts and backsListed buildings & other
historic featuresArchaeologyBuilding scale, height,
massingLocal vernacularEtc…
People and use
Neighbourhood structure Surrounding land usesConsultation and engagementSocio-economicsMarket analysisEtc…
site | neighbourhood | region | site |neighbourhood | region |site |neighbourhood |region |site |neighbourhood |region
puzzle solving
Mind the gap!
• Relate findings to design proposal• SWOT
• Constraints and opportunities
• Analyse what to analyse
• Doing vs drawing
puzzle solving storytelling
+
urban design =
An example
• Analysis
• Key findings
• Relevance• Justification
• Constraint
• Opportunity -inspiration
An example
puzzle solving
• Analysis
• Key findings
• Relevance• Justification
• Constraint
• Opportunity -inspiration
An example
• Analysis
• Key findings
• Relevance• Justification
• Constraint
• Opportunity -inspiration
puzzle solving
An example
• Analysis
• Key findings
• Relevance• Justification
• Constraint
• Opportunity -inspiration
puzzle solving
DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
An example
• Development framework or “concept”• Design
response to key findings
An example
• Masterplan• Accommodating
buildings into framework
• Final design
A response design with sense of place, but... …the volume housebuilders’ treatment
Key tasks
• Desktop review• OS 1:25,000 • OS Vector• Topo / utilities• Google Earth / Bing • Local plan• Other background
documents
• Study the plans and highlight aspects for review
• Site visit• Camera• Plans at different scales• Markers
Presentation
• Appropriate to:• Audience
• Time and budget
• Presentation platform
• Tools• Drawings – hand / digital
• Photos
• Annotated plans
A
B
Montessori
Primary school
Community centre
Nursery
puzzle solving
An example
Regeneration site
puzzle solving
An example
• South facing canal frontage – potential for attractive spaces
• Building at right angles to canal will optimise solar orientation; building parallel to canal will cast shadows
Key design considerations
1. Solar orientation2. Connectivity3. Canal frontage4. Fronts and backs5. Height, massing, character6. Heritage7. Viable development parcels
puzzle solving
An example
• Area is disconnected from high street (Station Road)
• Extending existing streets will create direct routes and improve connectivity
Key design considerations
1. Solar orientation2. Connectivity3. Canal frontage4. Fronts and backs5. Height, massing, character6. Heritage7. Viable development parcels
puzzle solving
An example
• Canal has predominant green or “rural” character
• Existing embankment (bund) creates upper and lower levels; green & quiet and hard and animated character
• Design guidance needed for coherent approach?
Key design considerations
1. Solar orientation2. Connectivity3. Canal frontage4. Fronts and backs5. Height, massing, character6. Heritage7. Viable development parcels
puzzle solving
An example
• Site is bounded by “backs”.
• Introduce backs to backs
• Front of buildings to face and animate streets and spaces
Key design considerations
1. Solar orientation2. Connectivity3. Canal frontage4. Fronts and backs5. Height, massing, character6. Heritage7. Viable development parcels
puzzle solving
An example
• Adjoining buildings of varied style, mass and height
• Scale of development to relate to neighbouring buildings
2.5 storey (com.)
3-4 storey (com.)
8-10 storey
2.5 storey (res.)
2-4 storey (ind.)
Key design considerations
1. Solar orientation2. Connectivity3. Canal frontage4. Fronts and backs5. Height, massing, character6. Heritage7. Viable development parcels
puzzle solving
An example
• Retention of listed or “marker” buildings could help establish character and create sense of place
• Retained buildings require appropriate setting and “meaning”
• Building on heritage character - style guide, colour and materials palette? (red brick, steel window frames, roof shape etc.)
Key design considerations
1. Solar orientation2. Connectivity3. Canal frontage4. Fronts and backs5. Height, massing, character6. Heritage7. Viable development parcels
puzzle solving
An example
• Site constrained by dimensions – i.e. long and narrow
• “Standard” development parcel min. 53m wide
Key design considerations
1. Solar orientation2. Connectivity3. Canal frontage4. Fronts and backs5. Height, massing, character6. Heritage7. Viable development parcels
puzzle solving
An example
1. Silverdale Road realigned and extended to provide a direct link between Station Road and Pump Lane
2. Silverdale Rd punctuated by series of marker building…
3. …and spaces
4. Pedestrian links to canal frontage
5. Secondary links to Pump Lane (connected street network)
6. Building frontages animate streets and spaces, incl canal frontage
7. Backs against backs4
55
1
1
5
2
22 3
3
6
6
66
6
7
7
4
2
Urban design framework
puzzle solving
An example
Development options and capacity testing