MergedFileSKILL, AND PERSONALITY TOWARDS
By
in Partial fullfilment of the requirements for
Bachelor Degree in Business major in Management
May 2018
The Panel of Examiners declare that the skripsi entitled “THE
INFLUENCE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION, SKILL,
AND PERSONALITY TOWARDS ENTREPRENEURSHIP
JAKARTA” that was submitted by Nafilah Dzakiyah majoring in
Human Resources Management from the Faculty of Business was
assessed and approved to have passed the Oral Examinations on
May,
16 th 2018.
Examiner 1
Examiner 2
ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION, SKILL, AND
INTENTION FOR STUDENTS IN SMKN 1 BUDI UTOMO
JAKARTA” is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, an
original
piece of work that has not been submitted, either in whole or in
part, to
another university to obtain a degree.
Cikarang, Indonesia, May 16 th
2018
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I want to say a big thanks to ALLAH SWT, with His allowance
(ridho’) I could
be able to finish my skripsi.
1. For my parents, Bapak and Ibu thanks for your unconditional
support with
prayer, knowledge, affection, guidance and financial you gave, so I
could
taste the university and got the knowledge from it. In hope may
ALLAH
SWT bless it and bring benefits for us in the future.
2. For my supervisor, Ir. Erny Estiulina Hutabarat, MBA thanks for
your
support, knowledge and guidance in my skripsi process, so I could
finish it
right in time. In hope may God showered you with His
blessing.
3. For all lecturers in President University especially in
Management whom
with sincerity, thanks for gave me knowledge that would benefits
for me
in the future. In hope may God showered you all with His
blessing.
4. For my special partner, Handika D.C thanks for your
unconditional
support with prayer and hands, so I am able to pass the obstacles
during
skripsi process. In hope may ALLAH SWT bless you with His
kindness.
5. For my best friend, N. Wulan Dwi A. thanks for your
unconditional
support with prayer and understanding, so I am able to pass the
obstacles
during skripsi process. In hope may ALLAH SWT bless you with
His
kindness.
6. For my others friends and people that I can not mention it one
by one
whom support me with their kindness, thank you so much so I am able
to
finish my skripsi.
4.1 Pre Test
......................................................................................................37
4.2 Respondent Profile
....................................................................................39
4.5 Hypothesis Testing
....................................................................................46
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
......................51
5.1 Conclusion
.................................................................................................51
5.2 Recommendations
.....................................................................................51
Figure 1.3 Alumni Percentage
.................................................................................5
Figure 3.1 Theoretical Framework
........................................................................23
Figure 3.2 Research Framework
...........................................................................25
Figure 3.3 Slovin Formula
....................................................................................28
Figure 3.4 Validity Formula
..................................................................................29
Figure 3.5 Reliability Formula
..............................................................................30
Figure 3.6 Mean Formula
......................................................................................31
Figure 3.7 Standard Deviation
..............................................................................32
Figure 4.3 Pie Chart of Parents or Guardian Job
..................................................41
Figure 4.4 P-Ploth Graph Normality Test
.............................................................42
Figure 4.5 Histogram
............................................................................................43
Figure 4.6 Scatterplot
............................................................................................45
Table 1.3 Mision Statement
....................................................................................5
Table 2.1 Previous Research
.................................................................................17
Table 3.1 Operational Definition
..........................................................................26
Table 3.2 Cronbach Alpha
....................................................................................30
Table 3.3 Likert Scale
...........................................................................................31
Table 4.1 Validity Test
..........................................................................................37
Table 4.2 Reliability Test
......................................................................................38
viii
ABSTRACT
Drawing on the theory of entrepreneurship intention, this study
tests The
Influence of Entrepreneurship Education, Skill, and personality for
Students in
SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta. This is necessary in order to confirm
(or
disconfirm) conventional wisdom that entrepreneurship education,
skill, and
personality increases the intention to start a business. The
results indicate that the
need for independencis the key factor in the entrepreneurship
intention of students
and confirm the positive contribution that entrepreneurship
education, skill, and
personality has on their entrepreneurship intention. Finally,
recommendations are
offered which could help the school and students involved increase
the
effectiveness of entrepreneurship education, skill, and personality
actions aimed to
be able to achieved the school missions.
Keywords: Entrepreneurship education, skill, personality,
entrepreneurship
intention
1
The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) study, meanwhile,
demonstrates the
importance that entrepreneurship has acquired, having become a
basic tool, in the
current context, for job creation and the generation of wealth, and
highlighting the
fact that growth and economic development are linked to
entrepreneurship (Nabi,
Holden & Walmsley, 2010).
Figure 1.1 GEM economies by geographic region and economic
development
level
The efficiency-driven economies reported improvements in
government
entrepreneurship programs, even though policy makers in most
countries are
aware of the need to create such government programs. The lack of
reported
progress in government entrepreneurship programs may be because
policy
decisions should be complemented with appropriate implementation
and
monitoring processes.
2
According to GEM (2017) Indonesia is in the top 5 performers by
economy with
rating 9 out of 12. The other top 5 performers by economy are
Netherland with
rating 10 out of 12, Estonia with rating 6 out f 12, Switzerland
with rating 4 out of
12, and UAE 6 out of 12.
Figure 1.2 The Entrepreneurial Spirit Index
Source: Global Entrepreneur Monitor (2017)
The factor score is presented as a numerical value indicating a
country’s relative
spacing or standing on the entrepreneurial spirit (the latent
factor, common to
data set). Countries with higher factor score are those for which
the three
underlying variables (entrepreneurial awareness, opportunity
perception and
entrepreneurial self-efficacy) are also high.
Indonesia is the largest economy in Southeast Asia with GDP of
around 2.8
trillion USD, in size number 9 globally, and with an annual growth
rate around
5% (Trading Economics, 2018). Micro, small and medium enterprises
(MSMEs)
are the backbone of the Indonesian economy (Mudde, Widhiani &
Fauzi, 2017).
According to Global Entrepreneurship Index (Ács, Szerb & Lloyd,
2017),
Indonesia ranks 103 in the world and 18 in the Asia Pacific region.
Many
programs are set-up by government, school, universities, and
private sector to
stimulate entrepreneurship development as an instrument for
employability and
poverty alleviation that estimated 11.3% of the population living
below poverty
line (CIA, 2018).
Entrepreneurship development gets a lot attention in Indonesia.
Since 2017,
entrepreneurs accounted for 3% this has increasing to the minimum
of 2% as
desired by the Indonesian government but this is low in comparison
to the
3
neighboring countries: in Malaysia it is 5%, Singapore 7%, Thailand
4.5%,
Vietnam 3.3% (Mudde, Widhiani & Fauzi, 2017).
Education is a conscious and well-planned effort to create an
atmosphere of
learning and learning process so that learners actively develop
their potential to
have religious spiritual power, self-control, personality,
intelligence, noble
character, as well as the skills required of each individual,
society, nation and state
UUSPN No. 20 of 2003 (Ariadi, 2014). Intended for students who want
to work
or continue to college, refers to curriculum 2013 for vacational
school is more
practice than the theory, graduates ready to work and
independently, and place
study in school and work world.
SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta is an vacational school in Central
Jakarta
established since 1906. The achievement in its school has so many
such
achievement in level of national and province. The students can be
a step of being
an entrepreneur. The abundance of skills the student can afford to
grow into an
entrepreneur that the school provide. The curriculum verse in 2013
related to
entrepreneurship subjects is refined to Workshops and
Entrepreneurship. In the
future all teachers should be part of the effort to form the values
or
characterization of entrepreneurship in the students. Below is the
table of skill
competency that the school have.
Table 1.1 Skill Competency
3 Machining Technique
6 Concrete Construction Technique
4
According to Hakim (2010), some schools have implemented
entrepreneurship
education, some of these educational institutions provide teaching
in the form of
entrepreneurship practice as the main material. The problem here,
according to Sri
(2018) the construction tehnique teacher, the vocational school of
the students
who have the skills because they are specifically to be able to
work immediately
after graduating school, but the obstacle when there is pracitce of
entrepreneurship
education course in the class of twelve in semester one become an
entrepreneur
within two weeks, many students who do not use skills in becoming
entrepreneur,
but they sell products such as food and beverage which makes their
skills that
have been taught in school is unused. School expected from them
they could open
a service shop such as reparation for car and motorcycle, make
services of various
sketches such as face or maybe a building or construction for toys
which can be
sold, open the services of making and design website, etc.
According to Raharjo (2018) the building image teacher, at the
entrepreneurship
practice there is no one who become entrepreneur that sell the
service from skill
and knowledge that they have. Researcher have an opportunity to do
discussion
with student to find out the reasons they do not open service shop
of class twelve,
they have desire but they said they are doubting their self with
the knowledge for
example in the knowledge and skill they have and they might know
how to start
but they do not know how to run it because they are lack of
confident. The another
problem faced is the low number of graduates who become
entrepreneurs. As we
can see the table below:
Table 1.2 Data of entrepreneur alumni
Academic Year Number of entrepreneur
alumni
5
There is a fluctuation of the academic year 2014/2015 to academic
year
2015/2016 has increased by 23.41%, and from academic year 2015/2016
to
academic year 2016/2017 decreased by 16.55%. As we can see the
figure below
that describes the fluctuations from year to year.
Figure 1.3 Alumni Percentage
Source: SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta
This problem is inversely related to the mission of the school,
which we can see in
point 3 mentions, "build entrepreneurial spirit and able to compete
in the world of
work". On this occasion the problems faced by the school, the
researcher will do
research which focus on three main things that might have
influence:
entrepreneurship education, skill and personality towards
entrepreneurship
intention.
No. Mission Statement
1 Forming learners to believe, piety, noble character, healthy and
intelligent
2 Building integrity, work ethic, and having a soul of mutual
cooperation
for every school citizen
6
3 Build entrepreneurial spirit and able to compete in the world of
work
4 Developing the quality and quantity of facilities and
infrastructure based
on technology and the environment
5 Increasing the competence of educators and education
personnel
6 Carry out student-centered learning activities in fun
7 Implementing learning through the process of Planning,
Implementation,
Assessment, and Follow-up assessment results in accordance
with
applicable provisions
Source: SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta (2018)
A number of empirical research results indicate that formal
education fails to
achieve the target of entrepreneurship education. The contribution
of vocational
school on this issue is questionable by many parties, as many
graduates do not
meet the qualifications required by the user sector and are not
ready to become
entrepreneurs. The results of Winarno (2012) show that formal
education does not
have a significant influence on the formation of character and
entrepreneurial
attitude for learners. In his research on the effectiveness of
entrepreneurship
learning in vocational schools shows that (1) learning materials
and
entrepreneurial strategies are not effective enough in developing
entrepreneurship
values of students, (2) varying understanding of entrepreneurship
teachers
influence the failure of achievement of entrepreneurship class
goals.
The results of the Timmons & Spinelli (2014) study indicate
that formal education
is incapable of encouraging entrepreneurship in its graduates;
schools are only
limited to preparing their graduates on the knowledge of the
company, and
prepare mentally to find work, and just suppress the creativity
and
entrepreneurship of students.
The success of entrepreneurship education is strongly influenced by
the role of
teachers. Entrepreneurship teachers are required to be able to
instill attitudes and
entrepreneurial character for the students (Winarno, 2010). At the
World
Economic Forum (2009) it was emphasized that the success of
entrepreneurship
education is the same as choosing and promoting teachers who are
able to
7
encourage their students to get full-fledged experience. The fact
shows that most
vocational teachers are not trained in entrepreneurship, and are
less aware of the
right approach to entrepreneurship teaching. Given that teachers
have a central
role to the success of entrepreneurship education, the
standardization of
entrepreneurship teachers in vocational schools is an important and
urgent thing to
do. in some countries have also varied entrepreneurship education
including the
development of various models (inside and outside education) by
developing all
related elements (Hampden & Turner, 2010). When viewed from the
distribution
of these subjects to the curriculum during this time teachers
generally complain
about the availability of time for entrepreneurship subjects that
are only 2 hours a
week, causing them (entrepreneurial teachers) can not freely
develop innovative
entrepreneurship education models (Winarno, 2015).
1.2 Problem Statement
The background of the problem has illustrated us that
entrepreneurship intention is
a very important aspect and desirable hope of the school to create
the goals to be
achieved as its mission. In order to create that goal there are
several factors that
might influence entrepreneurship intention, both factors that come
from within the
students and factors that come from outside the students
themselves. Judging from
the background of the problem it can be identified as the following
problems:
1. Low of hours teaching in entrepreneurship education in SMKN 1
Budi
Utomo Jakarta (Winarno, 2015).
2. Lack of development in student skill in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo
Jakarta
(Winarno, 2015).
3. Personality of students in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta is changing
follow
the individual intuition (Sarwono, 2010).
4. Entrepreneurship intention of students in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo
still in
level of expecting and has not set the special regulation for reach
the target
(Top, Colakglu & Dilek, 2012).
1. Is there any influence of entrepreneurship education given
towards
entrepreneurship intention ?
2. Is there any influence of skill towards entrepreneurship
intention ?
3. Is there any influence in personality towards entrepreneurship
intention ?
4. Are there any influence in entrepreneurship education, skill
and
personality towards entrepreneurship intention ?
1.4 Research Objectives
1. To find out whether any influence of entrepreneurship education
towards
entrepreneurship intention in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta
2. To find out whether any influence of skill towards
entrepreneurship
intention in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta
3. To find out whether any influence of personality towards
entrepreneurship
intention in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta
4. To find out whether any influence of entrepreneurship education,
skill and
personality towards entrepreneurship intention in SMKN 1 Budi
Utomo
Jakarta
1. For SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta :
The results of this study are expected to be used or added value as
input
and reference for school to take policy or decisions that may be
necessary
in an effort to increase entrepreneurship intention
9
This research is expected to provide useful information, insight
and
experience directly in facing the problems that exist in the
student and
school world.
1.6 Limitations
This research will be conduct in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta. Due to
the
widespread coverage of entrepreneurship intention with several
factors that may
not be revealed as a whole, the problems in this study are limited
to
entrepreneurship education, skill and personality. The research was
conducted on
the student in class twelve or XII. The population of the student
are 209. The total
of sample will be used 138 and additional 30 student for pre-test
(will be explain
in chapter 3). This research only use the student from SMKN 1 Budi
Utomo
Jakarta. The limitation of this problem is done with the aim that
the discussion can
be done more focused and there is no widening discussion.
1.7 Skripsi Organization
Chapter I: Introduction. In this chapter will containe Introduction
and an
overview discussed through the background of problem, the
introduction of
economic condition in Indonesia and influence of entrepreneurship
education,
skill, and personality towards entreprenurship interest which is
the subject of this
study. There is also statement of problem, researcher questions,
and researcher
objectives. And there are significant of study and limitation of
problems and
discussion in this study including this chapter.
Chapter II: Literature Review. In this chapter will containe an
overview
about each variable in education entrepreneurship, skill,
personality and
entrepreneurship intention. There is also the previous research,
and research gap.
10
Chapter III: Methodology. In this chapter will containe the
methodology of this
research using quantitative method. There is also the research
framework,
hyphothesis, research design, sampling plan, and statistical
treatment.
Chapter IV: Data Analysis. In this chapter will containe the
analysis of the
result in the research. There is a descriptive analysis and
inferential analysis.
Chapter V: Conclusion. In this last chapter will contain the
conlcusion overall
of this reseach.
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Entrepreneurship
According to Stokes (2010) entrepreneurship is the process of
creating something
new from value with the corncentrate of the necessary time, effort,
with financial,
physical, social risk and receiving rewards generated from
monetary, personal
satisfaction and independence. Process dimensions often center on
developing
new business strategies or innovations and writing business plans,
activities that
are sometimes seen as a substitute for the entrepreneurial process
itself. This
confuses the micro-level agency process of entrepreneurial
activity, the practice of
nuts and bolts by individual entrepreneurs with structural
processes at the rate of
change of society (Stokes, 2010).
2.2 Entrepreneurship Education
From the side of the national standard of education that becomes
the reference in
curriculum development, entrepreneurship education is included into
the material
that must be taught and mastered and realized by the learners in
their daily life.
The point of the problem in entrepreneurship education in schools
and universities
has touched on the level of recognition of values or norms, and not
yet at the level
of realization in everyday life (Judge & Bono, 2015).
The essence of entrepreneurship education is a bridge the gap
between innovation,
creativity, ongoing business conversions and to detect problems or
challenges,
apply creatively and innovative solutions and through several
thought processes to
bring in supply and shared request elements (Mungroo, 2010).
This research investigates the decision of opportunity, expectation
and benefits
from entrepreneurship education
12
The first is decision of opportunity is a termination of the
thought process of a
problem or problem to answer a question what must be done to
overcome the
problem, by dropping a choice on an alternative (Nutt, 2010).
According to Anwar
(2014) Opportunities can be understood as situations and conditions
that exist in
each person or individual. Such situations and conditions enable a
person to act or
do activities. Anwar (2014) conclude decision of opportunity is a
certain
opportunity that can be obtained someone or more rely on the
potential of existing
self and take advantage of various opportunities or opportunities
with immediate
retrieval.
The second, expectancy theory of motivation was proposed by Victor
H. Vroom
(Hubeis, 2013). Vroom emphasizes more on outcomes than needs as
Maslow and
Herzberg put it. Three basic Vroom assumptions of his theory are as
follows:
1. Every individual believes that when he behaves in a certain way,
he will gain
certain things. This is called an outcome expectancy as one's
subjective judgment
of the possibility that a certain outcome will arise from that
person's actions.
2. Each result has a value, or appeal to a particular person. This
is called valence
(valence) as the value that people give to an expected
outcome.
3. Each result relates to a perception of how difficult it is to
achieve that result.
This is called effort expectancy as the possibility that one's
efforts will result in
the achievement of a particular goal.
This theory states that the forces that motivate a person to work
hard in doing his
work depend on the mutual relationship between what is wanted and
needed from
the work. Vroom suggests that people will be motivated to do
certain things to
achieve goals if they are confident that their actions will lead to
the achievement
of that goal.
13
The third, according to Hafsah (2016) states that the perception of
benefits is the
level at which users believe, that by using something offered the
result they will
feel the benefits derived from the use of the result.
2.3 Skill
Skills are a science that outwardly within the human being and the
necessity of
being studied depth by developing the skills they possess (Badatu,
2015).
According to Dunnette (Khoiro, 2014) skills is the capacity needed
to carry out
some tasks that are the development of training outcomes and
experience gained.
Skill influence specific behaviors through increasing use of
informal source for
indentify oppotunities, namely, engagement in networking behaviors
(McAbee,
2014).
entrepreneurship education
or tactics. Being practicing is a straightforward practice,
discussing case studies,
or direct directing.
According to Khoiro (2014) Basically skills are categorized into 4,
namely: 1)
Basic literacy skill, basic skills are a definite skill of a person
and must be owned
by most people can get by learning first from the theory, such as
reading, writing
and listening. 2) Technical skills, Technical expertise is
someone's skill within the
development of techniques owned by practicing, such as counting
right, operate
the computer. 3) Interpersonal skills, Interpersonal skill is one's
ability effectively
to interact with others as well as with coworkers or networking
ability, like good
listeners, express opinions clearly and work in a team. 4) Problem
solving,
Solving problems is the process of activities to sharpen logic,
argue and solve
problems and the ability to know the cause, develop alternative and
analyze and
choose a good solution.
14
Based on Hadi (2014) Networking is possibly one of the most
important skills for
entrepreneurs and is one which you have the opportunity to
practice. Networking
involves building and maintaining contacts and relationships with
other people.
The personal networks which you accumulate over time, both socially
and
professionally can be an invaluable resource. This applies whether
you are an
entrepreneur looking to start and grow your own new venture,
whether you are
looking for a job, or working on a project where external ideas and
input can help.
For entrepreneurs, a contact made at a purely social event may
ultimately help to
provide you with one of the key ingredients for the start of the
business.
2.4 Personality
There are various theories that explain the aspects of personality.
Some theories
on the explanation of how the development of personality while
others focus on
the various personality.
This research investigates the personal attitude, action and
creativity from
personality.
According to Heerdjan (Antonio, 2013) explains that personality is
a collection of
some mental functions that bind within a person's abilities that
will have an effect
on improving oneself, for others as well as the environment in
which the
individual lives. When the usefulness of individual personality is
disrupted, the
individual will not be able to perform properly on a daily
basis.
The first, according to Rakhmat (2008) There are five understanding
attitudes are:
1. Attitude is the tendency of a person to be able to act, think
and also feel that he
is best in the face of objects, ideas and also the situation or
value. Attitude is not a
behavior according to Jalaluddin but a tendency to behavior by
using only certain
methods against attitude objects. Objects themselves can be
anything like the
person, place, idea, or situation in the group.
15
2. Attitudes have a helpful or motivational power that can be
considered
appropriate or appropriate. Attitude is not just a recording of an
event that has
been passed or has passed. However, attitudes can determine whether
a person
should side with a thing or be somebody who has a minus or plus
side within,
other than that decisive attitude of what is liked, expected, and
desired, and more
often put aside what is not desirable, and what should they are
avoided or disliked.
3. Attitudes tend to be more sedentary. Studies show that group
political attitudes
tend to be retained and rarely experienced breaks, which is why
attitudes rarely
change.
4. Attitudes can be an evaluative material for a person, where
attitudes may be
either fun or unpleasant. That's why the attitude often makes a
person defensive or
more open.
5. Attitudes often stem from misunderstandings where attitudes are
not brought
about at birth but attitudes derive from the environment as well as
one's
experiences. Not just from birth or carried on genetic basis.
The second, according to Weber (Sarwono, 2010) argues that
individuals perform
an action based on their experience, perception, understanding and
interpretation
of a particular stimulus object or situation. This individual
action is a rational
social action, that is, to achieve goals or targets with the most
appropriate means.
Weber's theory was further developed by Talcott Parsons, who began
by
criticizing Weber, saying that action or action was not behavior or
behavior.
According to Parsons (Sarwono, 2010) Action is a mechanical
response or
response to a stimulus where as behavior is an active and creative
mental process.
The main one is not individual action, but the guiding norms and
social values and
behavioral regulator. Objective conditions united with a collective
commitment to
a value will develop a certain form of social action.
16
The third, dreavdahl (Ngalimun, 2013) defines creativity as the
ability to produce
new compositions and ideas that can be tangible creativity or
synthesis that may
involve the formation of new patterns and combinations of past
experiences
associated with existing ones in the present situation. Creativity
also does not
always produce something that can be observed and detected.
According Jawwad (Kemendikbud, 2011) creativity is the ability to
think to
achieve new and varied results, and allows to be applied, both in
the field of
science, sports, literature, and other fields of abundant life.
According to Chandra
(Kemendikbud, 2011) creativity is a mental ability and various
types of typical
human skills that can give birth to unique, different, original,
completely new,
beautiful, efficient, targeted and appropriate.
Maslow (Kemendikbud, 2011) states that creativity is likened to the
naive
creativity and imagination of children, a way that is not
prejudiced, and directly
looking at things or being assertive. Creativity is a trait someone
would expect
from self-actualization.
According to Subandono (Verosa, 2015), entrepreneurship intention
is the
tendency of the heart in the subject to be interested in creating a
later business
organizing, managing, taking risks and developing a business he
created it. The
entrepreneurial interest comes from within oneself to creating a
business field.
Interest in entrepreneurship is the desire, interest as well
occupational choice and
willingness to work hard, perform their capability or to raise
awareness to be self-
reliant or trying to meet the needs of his life without fear of
risk will occur, and
always learn from the failures experienced (Santoso, 2009).
This research investigates the occupational choice, capability and
subjective norm
from entrepreneurship intention.
17
According to Mwiya (2014) Occupational choice refers to the process
by which
individuals select an occupation or career field to pursue career
choice. Capability
refers to the skills, ability, aptitude and knowledge you have in
relation to the job
that you are employed to do. Lack of capability will in most cases
lead to
unsatisfactory performance in your role which in turn is likely to
cause problems.
According to Azjen (Maskur, 2015) Subjective Norm Is a person's
perception of
social pressure to do or not to behave. According to Marhaini
(Maskur, 2015)
said, in this theory the behavior of a person depends on the
intention, then the
intention in behaving depends on the attitude and subjective norms.
On the other
hand, belief in behavior and evaluation will determine behavior.
Normative
beliefs and motivation to follow the opinions of others will
determine subjective
norms.
Refers to Thomson (Maskur, 2015) The subjective norms are the
social influences
that affect a person to behave. A person will have a desire for an
object or
behavior if he is influenced by the people around him to do it or
he believes that
the environment or the people around him support for what he is
doing. Perceived
behavioral control relates to the resources it has and the
opportunity to do
something.
1 The Impact of
addition, recent research
both positive
personality in determining
relationship between an
entrepreneur’s personality
and the strategic
new venture.
entrepreneurship skills
importance of training to
2.7 Research Gap
This investigation expects to examine the influence of
entrepreneurship education,
skill and personality towards entrepreneurship intention in SMKN 1
Budi Utomo
Jakarta. This research found different variables that affecting
entrepreneurship
intention. This research makes the variables more specific to
Entrepreneurship
Education, Skill, and Personality into Entrepreneurship Intention
at SMKN 1 Budi
Utomo Jakarta. Subject of this study is student in twelve class of
SMKN 1 Budi
Utomo Jakarta. Researcher decides to merge those factors and
discover the
connection with entrepreneuship intention.
The research gap shows the comparation between the previous
researches with
current research. Where the research above examining the student of
twelve class
in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta, contrasted with Mwiya (2014) examined
about
21
the institution and individual factors toward entrepreneurship
intention in Zambia,
Ali (2010) and McAbee (2014) discussed about the Effect of
personality. Ali
(2010) in South Africa for random respondent and McAbee (2014) in
Texas for
University student, Mungroo (2010) examined about entrepreneurship
education
focused on additional entrepreneurship education course, and also
Badatu (2015)
examined about the entrepreneurship skill for woman in Ilemela and
Nyamagana
districts.
Researcher found that there are some different variables that
influence the
entrepreneurship intention. To find out the gap of the study, the
researcher
combine the independent variables (Entrepreneurship Education,
Skill, and
Personality) with the dependent variable (Entrepreneurship
Intention) to discover
the relationship.
3.1 Theoretical Framework
This research is a quantitative research. This study aimed to test
the hypothesis
that has been set and to determine the effect of independent
variable on dependent
variable. Entrepreneurship intention is the intention of a person
to be an
entrepreneur (Karabulut, 2016).
According to Gerba (2012) Entrepreneurship education has a positive
effect on
entrepreneurship intention. People who have entrepreneurship
intentions can be
more successful through when they establish their ventures. They
can be more
dedicated to entrepreneurship when they face with problems in the
process of
managing their ventures.
Fasri (2012) Skill through practice or training has positive effect
on
entrepreneurship intention. Entrepreneurship intentions of
participants in various
stages of practice or training program and depending on nature of
trainings might
be of great help to shed some light on various aspects of
entrepreneurial training
programs effect on intention and its antecedents.
Refers to Karabulut (2016) Personality has a positive effect on
entrepreneurship
intention. Academicians can examine personality and other factors
which affect
entrepreneurial intention by conducting follow-up studies.
Potential entrepreneurs
can understand personality traits affecting the entrepreneurship
intention much
better and improve these traits to become successful
entrepreneurs.
The populations in this research were student of classs twelve. The
design in this
research can be described as follows:
23
H1
H3
Source: Developed by researcher (2018)
This study is the explanatory research which will prove a causal
relationship
between the independent variable which are entrepreneur education,
skill and
personality variables; dependent variable which is entrepreneur
intention. As well
as correlation research, the research is to see whether two or more
variables have a
relationship or not, and how much the relationship it is and how
the direction of
the relationship.
3.2 Hyphothesis
Based on subject matter, the purpose of research and analysis model
that has been
describes, it can be formulated in the hypothesis. Hypothesis is an
empirical
testing version of a theoretical proposition that has not yet been
tested or validated
with the empirical evidence (Neuman, 2014). Hypothesis can
formulated as
follows :
Entrepreneurship
Education
Skill
Personality
Entrepreneurship
Intention
H2
H4
24
Intention
H2 : There is influence of Skill towards Entrepreneurship
Intention
H3 : There is influence of Personality towards Entrepreneurship
Intention
H4 : There is influence of synchronous of Entrepreneurship
Education, Skill and
Personality towards Entrepreneurship Intention.
3.3 Research Framework
Before starting the research needs to be made research steps, where
the research
steps are :
3.4 Operational Definition
Problem Statement
supply and shared request
outwardly within the human
being studied depth by
developing the skills they
some mental functions that
bind within a person's
effect on improving oneself,
environment in which the
individual lives (Heerdjan in
creating a later business
3.5 Instrument (Questionnaires)
In this section, the researcher had distributed questionnaire to
the employees of,
the indicators are consisting of 5 different esteems. Those are;
Strongly Disagree
27
with an estimation of 1, Disagree with an estimation of 2, Neutral
with an
estimation of 3, Agree with an estimation of 4, Strongly Agree with
an
estimation of 5 (Sekaran and Bougie, 2013).
The indicators and the number of questionnairs that is related to
indicator already
mentioned in Table 3.1 Operational Definition. The researches that
mentioned
below are explained in Table 2.1 Previous Research. The first
independent
variable is Entrepreneurship Education, all the indicators and the
questionnairs are
from Mungro (2010) related with his research concerning in
Entrepreneurship
Education. The second independent variable is Skill, indicators and
questionnairs
got from Badatu (2015) with his research concerning in The Impact
of
Entrepreneurship Skill Provision to Women in Micro and Small
Enterprises
Performance and McAbee (2014) with his research concerning in
Personality,
Interpersonal Skill, and Student’s Job Search Behaviors. The third
independent
variable is Personality, indicators and questionnairs got from
Mwiya (2014) with
his research concerning in The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education
on the
Relationships between Institutional and Individual Factors and
Entrepreneurial
Intention of University Graduates and Ali (2010) with his research
concerning in
The Person-Organization Interplay: How an Entrepreneur’s
Personality Affects
Organizational Legitimacy.
3.6 Sampling Plan
Sugiyono (2010) stated, sampling is a sum and normal for a
populace. The
examination populace will be ingested on representatives of, where
the example in
the examination will be utilized to help analyze the issues.
Populace is the social
affair of individuals, events, or things essential to which the
specialist needs to
make inductions or in view of test insights (Sekaran & Bougie,
2010)
The example is still piece of the populace which has a similar
relative trademark
and it is utilized for speak to the populace with the level of
blunder that can at
present be endured (Sugiyono, 2011). For the sample in this
examination is the
student of twelve classs. The researcher use non-probability
sampling
Manufacturing, using calculations from the Slovin formula.
Here is the formula:
N = Number of population
So:
N
n=
1+209(0,05) 2
n= 138 Respondent
Through the estimation, the example is 137,742 that adjusted to
138. So the
example in this examination is 138 respondents (n= 138). Through
Slovin
formula, the quantity of test is 138 representatives out of 209
students. This
exploration is utilizing 5% of blunder resilience which implies the
level of
accuracy is 95%. (Ariola, 2014).
The analyst has assembled the information from respondents of. The
population
assembled is 209 students. At first 30 respondents were required
for the pre-test to
examine legitimacy and reliability trial of the survey information.
In this way, the
researcher will examine by utilizing SPSS 24 and Microsoft Excel
2010, the
strategy for different relapse examination with add up to test of
209 students.
29
3.6.1 Validity Test
To get an accurate result, then the questionnaire must be able to
pass the validity
test. Hair (2010), it has been mentioned that validity comes in the
form of a scale
of a set of measures that accurately represents an interesting
concept. Legitimacy
test is utilized as an apparatus to quantify the exactness of all
questions in the
questionnaire used.
The researcher uses α (0.05) significant level, in which each
question must be
higher than the one mentioned α (0.05) so it can be valid. In light
of Cohen
(2011), any inquiries from the poll can be announced true blue if
the level is
noteworthy >α (0.05), in this exploration, that is quantitative
research, to enhance
the legitimacy of inspecting it must be finished with mind
including appropriate
measurements of the information. According to Pearson, if (n) = 30,
so df = n – 2
Figure 3.4 Validity Formula
Source: Melike (2013)
or 30 – 2 = 28 and alpha = 0.05 be gotten r table 0.361. r should
be more
unmistakable than 0.361, if r lesser than 0.361 so the variable is
invalid. The
condition of authenticity test is:
Where:
∑xy = Sum of the products of pair scores
∑x = Sum of x scores
∑y = Sum of y scores
∑x 2 = Sum of Squared x scores
∑y 2
30
3.6.2 Reliability Test
From the obtained data it will go through Reliability test in order
to create an
accurate research. Where Reliability can be defined as a test that
can measure and
indicate the extent to which it is without further error and
therefore ensures a
stable result over time and during different things, (Sekaran &
Bougie, 2010). The
researcher used the Cronbach Alpha formula where the result will
show how well
the items are measured the positive connection with others.
Figure 3.5 Realibility formula
Where:
Table 3.2 Cronbach Alpha Internal Consistency
Cronbach’s Alpha Internal Consistency
α ≥ 0.9 Excellent
0.5 ≤ α < 0.6 Poor
3.7 Descriptive Analysis
3.7.1 Likert Scale
This Likert scale is utilized for a pointer of poll reply. As
indicated by (Sekaran
and Bougie, 2010) Likert is has been utilized to discover how solid
the subject
concurred or couldn't help contradicting an inquiry, these are the
5 focuses scales:
Table 3.3 Likert Scale
Source: Sekaran & Bougie (2010)
3.7.2 Mean
Mean means the general estimation of every factor. As per Andale
(2014), Mean
is normally utilized for focusing on the populace. Mean
formula:
Figure 3.6 Mean Formula
Scale Numerical
3.7.3 Standard Deviation
Standard Deviation is actually a number used to quantify numbers
that are
extended from mean. Here is the equation of Standard
Deviation:
Figure 3.7 Standard Deviation
Source: (Laksita, 2016)
3.8.1 Classical assumption
The customary assumption test is used to choose the exactness of
the data.
According to Santoso (2009) A backslide model will be used to guess
an average
model is a model with a base assessing screw up. In like manner, a
model used
before should meet a couple of assumptions, usually called built up
assumptions.
In this examination the customary supposition test used is:
Normality Test,
Autocorrelation Test, Multicolinearity Test, and Heterokedastisitas
Test.
a. Normality Test
According to Priyatno (2008), ordinariness is a test to know the
flow of test data
from the normal masses is scattered or not. Averageness test is
basic to perceive
what kinds of estimations to use for energize data examination.
Conventionality
test data is done by non-parametric quantifiable technique that is
using
Kolmogrov-Smirnov test on SPSS 24. For this examination the
criteria used are
according to the accompanying:
34
b. If sig. (2-tailed) < 0.05, data distribution is not
normal
c. Multicollinearity Test
According to Wijaya (2009) Multicollinearity test is a test seemed
to test whether
the backslide show found a connection between free factors
(self-ruling
components). A tolerable backslide demonstrate should not be
multicollinearity.
To recognize this, it ought to be conceivable by looking (Variance
Inflation
Factor) and Tolerance.
b. Tolerance value greater than 0.1
c. Heterosedacity Test
Ghozali (2013) Heteroskedasticity test is to choose if in the
backslide show there
is a difference in unevenness of extra observation with various
recognitions, if the
rest of the distinction is one view of the other unmistakable
discernments which is
then called heteroscedasticity.
b. Autocorrelation test
Autocorrelation test is to know whether in straight backslide
exhibit there is
association between data in period t with error in period t-1
(past) (Ghozali, 2013).
Autocorrelation emerges because of similar perceptions after some
time identified
with each other. This issue emerges on the grounds that the deposit
cannot be
isolated starting with one perception then onto the next. Analyzer
utilized is
Durbin-Watson test.
3.9 Multiple Linear Regression Model
Concurring Sugiyono (2011) backslide examination is used to make
figures, how
to change the dependent variable when the estimation of free
factors extended or
cut down regard (controlled).
X2 = Independent variable (Skill)
X3 = Independent variable (Personality)
Data examination frameworks in this examination using backslide
examination
straight extraordinary. Different direct backslide examination is a
quantifiable
framework used to anticipate how the state or effect of self-ruling
elements to the
destitute variable.
Y = b0 + b1 X1 + b2 X2 + b3 X3 + e
In this examination, there are 3 free factors which are
Entrepreneurship Education
(X1), Skill (X2), and Personality (X3). The examination
destinations are to
investigation representative effectively in. The numerous direct
relapse is utilized
since the specialist just need to examination between X1, X2,X3 and
Y and
furthermore the connection amongst X1 and Y, X2 and Y, X3 and
Y.
3.9.1 T – Test
The T-Test reason for existing is to quantify the effect of
autonomous variable
towards subordinate variable in part (Malhotra, 2010). Utilizing
the table
coefficient to help decide impact of every free factor to
subordinate variable. On
the off chance that the underneath 0.05, at that point don't
dismiss Ha and reject
H0, and precisely inverse if the critical is more than 0.05,
dismiss Ha and don't
dismiss H0
3.9.2 F – Test
Based on Malhotra (2010) F-Test is to find out the overall model of
multiple
regressions. Result will show in the event that there is huge
connection between
36
free factors and ward variable. In the event that the F-Test
demonstrates a level of
hugeness underneath 0.05, implies dismissing H0 and presume that
there is a
connection between them, vice versa.
3.9.3 Adjusted R-Square Test
This test design is to decide how assist precisely the free factors
could clarify the
reliant variable. Suryanto (2016) expressed that If the estimation
of R2 goes close
to one, it implies that the autonomous factors give all data that
expected to foresee
the reliant variable.
4.1 Pre – Test
It has been utilized to see whether the information we utilize is
substantial and can
be utilized to help the examination. To decide it, the r esteem
must be more than
0.0361. On the off chance that the outcome is higher than the
expressed esteem r
then the exploration can continue to the dependability test
4.1.1 Validity Testing
In light of that Pearson's Correlation esteem for df = 30-2 or 28,
it shows that the
estimation of least alpha (α) of everything ought to be .361 in the
0.05 level of
essentialness. By taking a gander at the table above, it
demonstrates that every
factor is more than the base alpha (α) level and it is announced
substantial.
Table 4.1 Validity Test
VARIABLES ITEMS PEARSON’S
S2 0.482 0.361 VALID
4.1.2 Reliability Testing
Skill (X2) 0.777 RELIABLE
Personality (X3) 0.834 RELIABLE
Entrepreneurship Intention (Y) 0.837 RELIABLE
Source: Developed by researcher (2018)
The base of Cronbach's Alpha esteem is 0.6 Sekaran and Bougie
(2010). The table
above is the aftereffects of the dependability trial of this
present research's factors.
Cronbach's Alpha translation in Entrepreneurship Education is
0.879, Skill is
0.777, Personality is 0.834, and Entrepreneurship Intention is
0.837. It inferred
that the greater part of the factors have a satisfactory level of
dependability.
39
Source: Developed by researcher (2018)
Figure 4.1 showed that from 138 respondents who fille the
questionnairs, the 17
years old student was a dominant respondent in this survey which is
97,1 % and
the others respondent in age 16 years old 2,2 % which is only two
person and in
age 18 years old 0,7% which is only one person. So, in this survey
due to only
student of class twelve or XII so the dominant age is in 17 years
old.
16 Years Old; 2,2%
17 Years Old; 97,1%
18 Years Old; 0,7%
Source: Developed by researcher (2018)
Figure 4.2 showed that from 138 respondents who fille the
questionnairs, the male
student was a dominant respondent in this survey which is 94,1 %
and the women
only 5,8% So, in this survey due to the vocational school
especially in technique
of student in class twelve or XII so the dominant was male.
Male; 94,2%
Women; 5,8%
Figure 4.3 Pie Chart of Parents or Guardian Job
Source: Developed by researcher (2018)
Figure 4.3 showed that from 138 respondents who fille the
questionnairs, the
parents or guardian job of student is employee was a dominant
respondent in this
survey which is 51,4 %, the entrepreneur is 19,6%, the teacher is
18,1%, the
government employee is 5,1%, the retirement is 4,3% and the others
are chef and
pharmacist both for 1,4%. So, in this survey due to the respondent
were a student
so to support their entrepreneurship intention for become an
entrepreneur they
need financial support from their parents or guardian. As we can
see the figure 4.3
the dominant that the parents or guardian can support their
entrepreneurship
intention because the parents or guardian have a job so that’s mean
they have
income to support their child when the student willing to open a
shop for become
an entrepreneur.
Employee; 51,4%
Teacher; 18,1%
Established suspicion test comprise of three test; Normality Test,
Multicollinearity
Test, and Heteroscedacity Test. Each test will be broke down
utilizing the SPSS
24 factual program.
4.3.1 Normality Test
Taking a gander at the figure 4.4 underneath, there is a direct
connection between
Entrepreneurship Edcuation, Skill, Personality and Entreprenerusip
Intention in
light of the fact that the information conveyance is following a
straight line from
the lower left to upper right of the chart.
From the figure 4.4 we can see that despite the fact that it isn't
flawless, the
information is considered has an ordinary circulation on the
grounds that the
dispersion of the information is chime formed. The holes of the
histogram
characterize that few respondents did not answer the inquiry
honestly.
Figure 4.4 P-Ploth Graph Normality Test
Source: SPSS 24 Output (2018)
43
4.3.2 Multicollinearity Test
Ghozali (2013) this test decides to test whether in relapse show
found the
relationship between the free factors. Great relapse model ought
not to happen
connection between free factors or ward variable. On the off chance
that the
autonomous factors are related, at that point this variable not
orthogonal. The
orthogonal factor is the free factors of connection esteem between
autonomous
factors equivalent to zero.
The imperative marker in this test Variance Inflation Factor (VIF)
and Tolerance.
VIF esteem is continually beginning from 1 and no upper bound,
Tolerance > 0.1
and VIF < 10 = Multicollinearity.
Seeing every one of the factors have tolerance higher than 0.1 and
VIF (Variance
Inflation Factor) under 10, the information from table 4.3 has no
relationship (No
44
1 (Constant) 7.997 1.631 4.903 .000
Entrepreneurship
Education
Skill .179 .076 2.343 .021 .632 1.582
Personality .242 .072 3.355 .001 .722 1.385
a. Dependent Variable: Entrepreneurship Intention
Source: SPSS 24 Output (2018)
4.3.3 Heteroscedacity Test
In light of the figure 4.6 beneath, we can see the information
appropriation is in
the zero-point zone of the y-hub, at that point this relapse
display is practical
Sarwono (2012).
4.4 Analysis of Multiple Linear Regression
The table 4.3 above will demonstrate the aftereffect of different
direct relapse
utilizing SPSS 24 that characterizes if the free factors have
influence towards the
dependent variable.
Y = 7.997 + .228X1 + 179X2 + 242X3 + e
Where:
e = Error tolerance 5% (0,05)
The outcome on Table 4.3 demonstrates that the relapse coefficient
that are
important which is ought to be (<0.05). There are three free
factors that are
important towards Entrepreneurship Intention.
Here is more detail:
1. The coefficient relapse of Entrepreneurship Education is .001,
which is not
exactly α (0.05). Along these lines, there is an influence towards
the Y
(Entrepreneurship Intention).
2. The coefficient relapse of Skill is .021, which implies it is
not exactly α
(0.05). Hence, this shows there is an influence towards the Y
(Entrepreneurship Intention).
3. The coefficient relapse of Personality is .001, which is not
exactly α
(0.05). Along these lines, there is an influence towards the
Y
(Entrepreneurship Intention).
Speculation Testing comprises of T-Test, F-Test, and Adjusted R
square.
4.5.1 T-Test Significance
Table 4.3 above shows that there are 3 independents factors that
having influence
on a dependent variable. Here is the last theory result:
1. Entrepreneurship Education (X1)
entrepreneurship intention.
entrepreneurship intention.
The estimation of Entrepreneurship Edcuation is .001 which is lower
than
α (0.05). Thusly, the variable has an influence on
Entrepreneurship
47
Intention. Implying that Ha1 is acknowledged and H01 is
rejected.
2. Skill (X2)
(H02): There is no influence of skill towards entrepreneurship
intention.
(Ha2): There is influence of skill towards entrepreneurship
intention.
The estimation is .021 which is lower than α (0.05). In this way,
the
variable has an influence on Entrepreneurship Intention. Implying
that Ha2
is acknowledged and H02 is rejected.
3. Personality (X3)
intention.
intention.
The estimation of personality is .001 which is lower than α (0.05).
Thusly,
the variable has an influence on Entrepreneurship Intention.
Implying that
Ha3 is acknowledged and H03 is rejected.
4.5.2 F-Test Significance
Table 4.4 Anova
1 Regression 199.227 3 66.409 25.184 .000 b
Residual 353.353 134 2.637
b. Predictors: (Constant), Personality, Entrepreneurship Education,
Skill
Source: SPSS 24 Output (2018)
The table 4.5 shows the result of F-test. Where the level of
significance is .000
which is lower than α (0.05), with F score 25.184. This indicates
that all variables
available (Entrepreneurship Education, Skill and Personality) in
this research are
simultaneously significant towards Entrepreneurship
Intention.
48
(H04): There is no influence of entrepreneurship education, skill,
and personality
towards entrepreneurship intention.
(Ha4): There are influence of entrepreneurship education, skill,
and personality
towards entrepreneurship intention.
4.5.3 Adjusted R Square
Model Summaryb
a. Predictors: (Constant), Personality, Entrepreneurship Education,
Skill
b. Dependent Variable: Entrepreneurship Intention
Source: SPSS 24 Output (2018)
The outcome from table 4.6 demonstrates that the estimation of
balanced R square
is 0.346 or 34.6%. This shows the factors which are
(Entrepreneurship Education,
Skill, and Personality) very ready to influence the needy variable
which is
(Entrepreneurship Intention). Meaning free factors are influencing
the dependent
variable by 34.6%, while whatever is left of level of 65.4% is
affected by different
factors in which are not associated with this examination.
Alternate factors that
researcher could suggest be utilized to investigate further are
Environment
(Gomezelj, 2013), Financial (Uddin, 2016), Creativity (Chia, 2016),
and so forth.
Those are exceedingly private information to investigate.
4.6 Discussion and Interpretation of Result
All the free factors beginning from Entrepreneurship Education,
Skill, and
Personality are appeared to have minor effect towards the needy
variable
Entrepreneurship Intention at SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta. In this
manner the
49
consequence of the information Adjusted R esteem in which are just
34.6%,
demonstrating that whatever remains of 65.4% are other obscure
factors that may
influence the Entrepreneurship Intention.
4.6.1 Entrepreneurship Education towards Entrepreneurship
Intention
In light of the investigation processed with SPSS 24 measurement
device, taken
from the theory of H1 it is demonstrated that Entrepreneurship
Education has an
influence towards Entrepreneurship Intention (at SMKN 1 Budi Utomo
Jakarta).
Entrepreneurship Education has T-Test consequence of 3.479 with
estimation of
.001 which is lower than α (0.05). Accordingly, Ha1 is
acknowledged, expressed
that there is influence of Entrepreneurship Education towards
Entrepreneurship
Intention. This is related with Gerba (2012) that there is
influence between
entrepreneurship education with entrepreneurship intention.
4.6.2 Skill towards Entrepreneurship Intention
In light of the investigation processed with SPSS 24 measurement
device, taken
from the theory of H2 it is demonstrated that Skill has an
influence towards
Entrepreneurship Intention (at SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta). Skill
has T-Test
consequence of 2.343 with estimation of .021 which is lower than α
(0.05).
Accordingly, Ha2 is acknowledged, expressed that there is influence
of Skill
towards Entrepreneurship Intention. This is related with Farsi
(2012) that there is
influence between skill with entrepreneurship intention.
4.6.3 Personality towards Entrepreneurship Intention
In light of the investigation processed with SPSS 24 measurement
device, taken
from the theory of H3 it is demonstrated that Personality has an
influence towards
Entrepreneurship Intention (at SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta).
Personality has T-
Test consequence of 3.355 with estimation of .001 which is lower
than α (0.05).
Accordingly, Ha3 is acknowledged, expressed that there is influence
of
Personality towards Entrepreneurship Intention. This is related
with Karabulut
50
to the student.
Entrepreneurship Intention
In light of the investigation processed with SPSS 24 measurement
device, taken
from the theory of H4 it is demonstrated that Entrepreneurship
Education, Skill
and Personality has an influence towards Entrepreneurship Intention
(at SMKN 1
Budi Utomo Jakarta). All the free factors (Entrepreneurship
Education, Skill and
Personality) has F-Test significant of .000 which is lower than α
(0.05).
Accordingly, Ha4 is acknowledged, expressed that there is influence
of
Entrepreneurship Education, Skill and Personality towards
Entrepreneurship
Intention.
51
We analyze this exploration entitled The Influence of
Entrepreneurship Education,
Skill, Personality toward Entrepreneurship Intention for Student in
SMKN 1 Budi
Utomo Jakarta . From the outcome, the specialist comprehend that
three free
factors (Entrepreneurship Education, Skill and Personality) were
influencing
towards Entrepreneurship Intention. In preparing the information of
this
investigation, the specialist utilized different relapse display as
the measurable
instruments. To finish up this examination, we have learnt:
1. Entrepreneurship Education has an influence towards
Entrepreneurship
Intention at SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta, it implies when the
Entrepreneurship
Education variable expanding there will influence to the expansion
of
Entrepreneurship Intention
2. Skill has an influence towards Entrepreneurship Intention at
SMKN 1 Budi
Utomo Jakarta, it implies when the Skill variable expanding there
will influence to
the expansion of Entrepreneurship Intention.
3. Personality has an influence towards Entrepreneurship Intention
at SMKN 1
Budi Utomo Jakarta, it implies when the Personality variable
expanding will
influence to the expansion of Entrepreneurship Intention.
4. Entrepreneurship Education, Skill and Personality simultaneously
have
significance influence toward Entrepreneurship Intention with R2
value of 34.6%.
5.2 Recommendations
1. For SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta
Paying attention to the results of the conclusions and
recommendations of the
model offered, suggestions can be put forward as follows:
1. For entrepreneurship teachers, efforts to certify their skills
to become
52
entrepreneurship teachers as recommended standards through
programmed
education and training need to be continuously done especially in
self-
development open networks with entrepreneurial teachers in other
schools.
2. School is advised to continuously expand the network of
cooperation with
various parties in order to facilitate students and teachers in
starting the practice of
opening a business.
3. School is advised to make rules about the provisions in practice
to become
entrepreneurs for students who are required to entrepreneurship
around skills that
have been taught in school.
4. Schools is advised to regularly hold seminars discussing the
personality of
teenager in high school, which is to be expected to reduce unstable
personalities
and students are able to think and make decisions
appropriately.
2. For Future Research
For future research who needs to utilize entrepreneurship intention
as an
examination material, future analysts can grow their investigation
all the more
particularly about other unexplored factors that will influence
representative
effectivity for example more recognition such as leadership,
environment
condition , etc. so as to investigate deeper and wider. In
addition, the researcher
suggests examining other related variables to entrepreneurship
intention by
looking at other school or organisation. By that the future
research can get a
comparison to run the research.
53
personality affects. University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Badatu, C. R. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship skills
provision to women in
micro and small enterprises performance. University of Tanzania,
Africa.
Hakim, D. (2010). Pengembangan Pendidikan Kewirausahaan
Berdasarkan
Nilai-Nilai Budaya Untuk Membentuk Daya Saing Dan Karakter
Bangsa.
Unipdu Jombang, Central Java.
Khoiro, U. (2014). Keterampilan menulis kalimat pelajaran bahasa
indonesia
menggunakan media gambar seri pada siswa kelas I di MI Miftahul
Ulum
Kemlagi Mojokerto. UIN Sunan Ampel, Surabaya.
McAbee, S. T. (2014). Personality, interpersonal skill, and student
job search
behaviors. Rice University, Texas.
Natal,South Africa.
Mwiya, B. M. (2014). The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on
the
Relationships between Institutional and Individual Factors
and
Entrepreneurial Intention of University Graduates: Evidence
from
Zambia. University of Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
Verosa, I. N. (2015). Hubungan Antara Locus Of Control Internal
dengan Minat
Berwirausaha. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Central
Java.
Journals :
Entrepreneurship achievement. Procedia social and behavioral
sciences
115, 251-257.
Ariadi, A. (2014). Peningkatan Motivasi Belajar Dan Hasil Belajar
IPA Tentang
Energi Dan Perubahannya Dengan Metode Jigsaw Pada Siswa Kelas
V
Semester II SDN 1 Karangnongko, Kecamatan Karangnongko,
Kabupaten
Klaten Tahun 2013 / 2014. Jurnal fakultas keguruan dan ilmu
pendidikan
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 3-9.
54
Chia, C. (2016). Influence of creativity and social capital on the
entrepreneurship
intention of tourism student. journal of entrepreneurs, management
and
investment, 20.
Farsi, A. A. (2012). The impact of opportunity recognition skills
training on
entrepreneurial intentions of nursing students. Journal of
knowledge
Management, Economics and Information Technology,
ScientificPapers,
vol. 2 (4), 1-6.
Gerba, D. T. (2012). Impact of entrepreneurship education on
entrepreneurial
intentions of business and engineering students in Ethiopia.
African
Journal of Management and Economy faculty Vol. 3 Issue: 2,
258-277.
Gomezelj, D. O. (2013). The influence of personal and environmental
factors on
entrepreneurs' intention. Keybernetes Vol.42 No.6, 6-10.
Hadinata, I. E. (2015). Serum βhCG levels posttreatment of ectopic
pregnancy
with a single dose of intramuscular methotrexate. Journal of
obstetrics and
gynaecology, 50.
Hafsah, A. (2016). The effect of ICT based graphic organizer
towards student's
writing ability at the fourth semester of the English education
study
program at IAIN Palangka Raya. Journal of faculty of english
IAIN
Palangka Raya, 20-25.
Hair, J. (2010). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of
Marketing theory,
30-37.
Revision vol. 30 (3–4), 69-78.
Hadi, I. S. (2014). entrepreneurship and education: creating
business awarness for
student in east java indonesia. Globe-edu, 459 - 463.
Hubeis, M. (2013). Pengaruh faktor kompetensi terhadap kinerja
individu di
perusahaan agroindustri go public. Manajemen IKM: Jurnal
manajemen
pengembangan industri kecil menengah, 30-36.
Judge, TA., & Bono J. (2015). Relationship of core
self-evaluations traits—self-
esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and
emotional
stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A
meta-analysis.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 80-92.
55
faculty of psychology, 40.
Journal on Business Review Vol.5 No.1, 46-58.
Maskur, A. (2015). Pengaruh norma subjektif dan kontrol prilaku
yang
dipersepsikan terhadap niat pinjam kur mikro. Jurnal Fakultas
Ekonomi,
20-23.
Melike, S. A. (2013). Assessing the Validity and Reliability of a
Questionnaire on
Dietary Fibre-related Knowledge in a Turkish Student Population.
J
Health Popul Nutr. 2013 Dec; 31(4). 497-503.
Nabi, G., Holden, R., & Walmsley, A. (2010). Entrepreneurial
intentions among
students: Towards a re-focused research agenda. Journal of Small
Business
and Enterprise Development, 17(4), 537–551.
Patricia, C. S. (2016). The effect of entrepreneurship education on
entrepreneurial
intention in Indonesia. DeReMa Jurnal Management Vol.11 No.1,
67-83.
Suryanto, A. (2016). Production Biodiesel from Coconut Oil Using
Microwave:
Effect of Some Parameters on Transesterification Reaction by
NaOH
Catalyst. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering &
Catalysis, 50.
Uddin, M. (2016). Influence of Demographic Factors on the
Entrepreneurial
Intentions of University Students in Oman. Investment Management
and
Financial Innovations, 34-36.
penelitian ekonomi dan bisnis, 205.
Winarno, A. (2012). Intensi Kewirausahaan: Perspektif
Karakteristik
Kepribadianm, Pembelajaran an Jaringan sosial (studi pada
mahasiswa
Program Akademik dan Vokasi UM). Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, year 17
no.
1 March, 67-78.
Anwar, A. P. (2014). manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bandung:
Remaja
Rosdakarya.
56
Ariola, M. M. (2014). Introduction to art appreciation : a textbook
in humanities-
second edition. Quezon: C & E Publishing.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. R. B. (2011). Research
Methods in
Education, seventh edition. London and New York: Routledge.
Cooper, D., & Schindler. (2014). Business Research Methods. New
York:
McGraw-Hill.
Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program
IBM SPSS.
Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponogoro.
Laksita, I. (2016). Hubungan Lama Menderita Hipertensi Dengan
Tingkat
Kecemasan Pada Lansia Di Desa Praon Nusukan Surakarta,
Universitas
Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Central Java.
Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation.
Boston:
Prentice Hall.
Approaches, seventh edition. Essex: Pearson Education
Limited.
Ngalimun. (2013). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta:
Aswaja,
Pressindo.
Nutt, P. (2010). Handbook of decision making (p. 1-100). London:
john willey &
son.
Priyatno, D. (2008). Mandiri Belajar SPSS (Untuk Analisis Data dan
Uji
Statistik). Yogyakarta: MediaKom.
Santoso. (2009). Lingkungan Tempat Tinggal Menentukan Minat. In
Santoso,
Lingkungan Tempat Tinggal Menentukan Minat (p. 50). Surakarta:
UNS.
Sarwono, S. (2010). Psikologi Remaja-Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Raja
Grafindo.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie. (2013). Research Methods for Business A
Skill-Building
Approach. 6th Edition. New York: Wiley.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research methods for
business: A skill building
Approach. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
57
Stokes, D. (2010). Entrepreneurship (p. 7). London: Cengage
Learning EMEA.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R
& D. Bandung:
Alfabetha Sukmadinata.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatis dan R
& D. Bandung
: CV Alphabeta.
Timmons, J. & Spinelli, S. (2004). New Venture Creation:
Entrepreneurship for
the 21 th Century (sixth edition). Burr Ridge: Irwin.
Winarno, A. (2010). Pendidikan Kewirausahaan Berbasis Nilai.
Surabaya: Putra
Media Nusantara.
World Economic Forum. (2009). Educating the Next Wave of
Entrepreneurs:
Unlocking entrepreneurial capabilities to meet the global
challenges of the
21st . Switzerland: Global Education Initiative Century.
Internet Sources:
and Disadvantages. Retrieved from
http://www.statisticshowto.com/
snowball-sampling/ assessed on April 20 th
2018.
Ács, Z. J., Szerb, L., & Lloyd, A. (2017). The global
entrepreneruship and
develpment institute. Global Entrepreneurship Index. Retrieved
from
https://thegedi.org/2018-global-entrepreneurship-index/, accessed
on May
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-
Departemen Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kemendikbud. (2011).
Survey
Internasional PISA (online). Retrieved from
http://litbang.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/survei-internasional-pisa,
2018.
Internasional TIMSS. (online). Retrieved from
http://litbang.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/survei-internasional-timss,
https://www.gemconsortium.org/report, accessed on may 17 th
2018.
http://www.statisticshowto.com/statistics-basics/, accessed on
April 17 th
2018).
Statistics How To. (2018). Statistic Intrument. Cronbach Alpha.
Retrieved from
http://www.statisticshowto.com/statistics-basics/, accessed on
April 17 th
2018).
Monitor. Global Report 2017/2018. Retrieved from
https://www.gemconsortium.org/report, accessed on May 22 nd
2018.
SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta. (2018). Tentang SMKN 1 Budi Utomo. Visi
dan
Misi. Retrieved from http://smkn1jakarta.sch.id/visi-dan-misi/,
accessed on
April 22 nd
2018.
SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta. (2018). Tentang SMKN 1 Budi Utomo.
Identitas
Sekolah. Retrieved from
http://smkn1jakarta.sch.id/identitas-sekolah/,
2018.
https://tradingeconomics.com/indonesia/gdp-growth-annual, accessed
on
May 22nd 2018).
Entrepreneurship Intention for student in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo
Jakarta”
Saya Nafilah Dzakiyah. Saya mahasiswi President University
jurusan
management. Survey ini akan membantu saya mengumpulkan data untuk
skripsi
saya. Tujuan dari kuesioner ini adalah untuk menyelidiki pengaruh
pendidikan
kewirausahaan, keterampilan dan kepribadian terhadap minat
kewirausahaan
untuk siswa di SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta. Survei ini akan memakan
waktu
hanya 5 menit dari waktu anda, jangan ragu untuk menyatakan
pendapat anda.
Terima kasih atas waktu dan usaha anda yang berharga.
I. Karakteristik Responden
61
Point 1 = Sangat Tidak Setuju (STS)
Table 3.2 Indonesian verse questionnaires
No. Variable Jawaban
1. Saya bisa mengambil peluang
dalam berwirausaha
tentang cara mengidentifikasi &
mengelola risiko dalam
mampu memotivasi untuk menjadi
1. Saya mendapatkan pelatihan
berwirausaha yang dapat membantu
saya memulai sebuah bisnis
hal
1. Saya akan merasa sangat puas jika
menjadi seorang pengusaha
keluar dalam menyelesaikan
4. Saya mempunyai banyak ide untuk
berwirausaha
sebuah karya seni
No. Variable Jawaban
1. Saya lebih memilih menjadi
63
sebuah bisnis
terbaik ketika memulai sebuah
keputusan saya untuk memulai
sebuah usaha atau bisnis
“The Influence of Entrepreneurship Education, Skill and Personality
toward
Entrepreneurship Intention for student in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo
Jakarta”
I am Nafilah Dzakiyah. I am a student of President University
majoring in
management. This survey will help me collect data for my thesis.
The purpose of
this questionnaire is to investigate the effect of entrepreneurship
education, skills
and personality on entrepreneurship intention for student in SMKN 1
Budi Utomo
Jakarta. This survey will take only 5 minutes of your time, feel
free to express
your opinion. Thank you for your valuable time and effort.
I. Characteristic Respondent
Point 4 = Agree (A)
Point 3 = Neutral (N)
Point 2 = Disagree (D)
No. Variable Alternative Answer
entrepreneurship
ideas into business
identify & manage risks in
an entrepreneur
entrepreneur to use performance
makes me be creative
the theory method
with other people
and network in many ways
No. Variable Alternative Answer
1. I would be very satisfied if I
became an entrepreneur
2. I was able to think of a way out in
solving the problem
entrepreneurship
work of art
1. I prefer to be an entrepreneur if the
66
3. I know how to use good
performance in business
decision to start a business
5. My family will approve of my
decision to start a business
II. INTERVIEW SESSION
Note: Q = Question | A = Answer Date Interview: April, 10th
2018
Part 1 – with teacher
Q1: Good afternoon, my name is Nafilah from President Unversity.
I’m here to do
my research. First, may i know your name Sir?
A1: Good afternoon, My name is Sri
Q2: What is your role here in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta ?
A2: I’m a construction tehnique teacher and homeroom teacher for
one class
(class twelve) in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta
Q3: Directly to the core of problem that i want to dig here, was
the
entrepreneurship education practice here run well?
A3: Yes, it was
A4: Only for class twelve
Q5: How long the period of entrepreneurship education
practice?
A5: Within 2 weeks
Part 2 – with teacher
Q1: Good afternoon, my name is Nafilah from President Unversity.
I’m here to do
my research. First, may i know your name Sir?
67
A1: Good afternoon, My name is Raharjo
Q2: What is your role here in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta ?
A2: I’m a building image teacher in SMKN 1 Budi Utomo Jakarta
Q3: I want to mention that I have had an interview before with Sir
Sri, so here is I
want to continue my question about was there any obstacle during
the
entrepreneurship education practice in student?
A3: Well, all of student didn’t use the skill that they had during
study in here.
Most of them just sold food and beverage while they are not being
taught to made
a food or beverage. They just did it because it was simple but no
value, they just
wanted to pass the subject.
Q4: Then was there any rules that prohibited for student sold food
and beverage?
A4: Unfortunately, the school didn’t set it as prohibited. All was
just in
expectation.
Part 3 – with several students of class twelve
Q1: Good afternoon, my name is Nafilah from President Unversity.
I’m here to do
my research. First, may I have your time guys to do interview
?
A1: Yes, you may
A2: Yes, We are
Q3: I have heard from your student, when you had time in
entrepreneurship
education practice, most of you guys didn’t sold the skill or
capability or
knowledge given in the school instead of food and beverage?
A3: Yes, we are not. It was easy and simple for selling food and
beverage
Q4: Then may i know the reasons?
A4: Maybe we are not confident enough with the knowledge that we
have. We
have willingness to for example open service shop for car or
motorcycle