+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The influence of pre-sowing seed treatments on germination and emergence of tomato ‘New Yorker’...

The influence of pre-sowing seed treatments on germination and emergence of tomato ‘New Yorker’...

Date post: 02-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: idalia
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
7
Scientia Horticulturae, 9 (1978) 119--125 119 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam -- Printed in The Netherlands THE INFLUENCE OF PRE-SOWING SEED TREATMENTS ON GERMINATION AND EMERGENCE OF TOMATO 'NEW YORKER' AT LOW TEMPERATURES J. RUMPEL and IDALIA SZUDYGA Research Institute of Vegetable Crops, Shierniewice (Poland) (First received 5 January 1978; in revised form 18 April 1978) ABSTRACT Rumpel, J. and Szudyga, I., 1978. The influence of pre-sowing seed treatments on germina- tion and emergence of tomato 'New Yorker' at low temperatures. Scientia Hortic., 9: 119--125. From several seed pretreatments studied, the highest reducing effect on time to germina- tion at 8, 12 and 15°C was obtained through soaking the seeds in a solution containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) at-7.5 bars potential + fusicoccin 10 -s M for 7 days at 20°C. Next was PEG alone, and a solution of 1.5% each of KNO 3 and K3PO , for 5 days at 24°C was third in effectiveness. The time required to 50% germination for the above pretreatments at 8°C was 15.7, 19.7 and 28.0 days, respectively, as compared to 52.7 days for the un- treated control. These time differences decreased with the increase of the germination tem- peratures. Pretreatment with fusicoccin in H20 resulted in a comparatively lower effect on time to germination. GA 3 alone or with kinetin and ethephon applied via acetone at 8 ° C had only a small reducing effect on time to germination. No effect on time to germination was observed from fusicoccin applied via acetone. Pretreatment of seeds with PEG, PEG + fusicoccin or KNO 3 + K3PO , as above, resulted in higher seedling emergence in field conditions as compared to the untreated seeds. However, no significant differences between the pre- treatments were observed. The field experiment was severely affected by abnormal weather conditions. INTRODUCTION Work at the Research Institute of Vegetable Crops in Skierniewice has shown the possibility for successful tomato culture from direct sowing in the conditions of Southern and Central Poland. However, frequent low tempera- tures in May can reduce the germination rate and final emergence, thus causing problems with the establishment of the uniform and dense plant stands re- quired for concentrated fruit maturity. A possibility of hastening the germina- tion and emergence under cool weather conditions would have a significant value for introduction of the drilled tomato culture. Our paper presents results of work on differe~lt pre-sowing treatments for increasing the seed germination and seedling emergence of tomato under cool conditions. The work was aimed at getting physiologically active, but not ger-
Transcript

Scientia Horticulturae, 9 ( 1 9 7 8 ) 1 1 9 - - 1 2 5 119 Elsevier Scient i f ic Publ i sh ing C o m p a n y , A m s t e r d a m - - P r in t ed in The Ne the r l ands

THE INFLUENCE OF PRE-SOWING SEED TREATMENTS ON GERMINATION AND EMERGENCE OF TOMATO 'NEW YORKER' AT LOW TEMPERATURES

J. R U M P E L and I D A L I A S Z U D Y G A

Research Institute of Vegetable Crops, Shierniewice (Poland)

(Fi rs t received 5 J a n u a r y 1978; in revised f o r m 18 April 1978)

A B S T R A C T

Rumpel , J. and Szudyga, I., 1978. The in f luence of pre-sowing seed t r e a t m e n t s on germina- t ion and emergence of t o m a t o 'New Y o r k e r ' a t low t empera tu res . Scientia Hortic., 9: 119- -125 .

F r o m several seed p r e t r e a t m e n t s s tud ied , the h ighes t r educ ing e f fec t on t ime to germina- t ion at 8, 12 and 15°C was o b t a i n e d t h r o u g h soaking the seeds in a so lu t ion c o n t a i n i n g p o l y e t h y l e n e glycol (PEG) a t - 7 . 5 bars p o t e n t i a l + fus icocc in 10 -s M for 7 days at 20°C. Next was PEG alone, and a so lu t ion of 1.5% each of KNO 3 and K3PO , for 5 days at 24°C was th i rd in effect iveness. The t ime requ i red to 50% ge rmina t i on for the above p r e t r e a t m e n t s at 8°C was 15.7, 19.7 and 28.0 days, respect ively, as c o m p a r e d to 52.7 days for the un- t r ea ted con t ro l . These t ime d i f fe rences decreased wi th the increase of the ge rmina t i on tem- pera tures . P r e t r e a t m e n t wi th fus icoccin in H 20 resu l ted in a compara t ive ly lower e f fec t on t ime to ge rmina t ion . G A 3 a lone or wi th k ine t in and e t h e p h o n appl ied via a c e t o n e at 8 ° C had on ly a small r educ ing e f fec t on t ime to ge rmina t ion . No e f fec t on t ime to ge rmina t ion was observed f r o m fus icocc in appl ied via ace tone . P r e t r e a t m e n t of seeds wi th PEG, PEG + fus icoccin or KNO 3 + K3PO , as above, resu l ted in h igher seedl ing emergence in field c o n d i t i o n s as c o m p a r e d to the u n t r e a t e d seeds. However , no s igni f icant d i f fe rences b e t w e e n the pre- t r e a t m e n t s were observed. The field e x p e r i m e n t was severely a f fec ted by a b n o r m a l wea the r condi t ions .

INTRODUCTION

Work at the Research Institute of Vegetable Crops in Skierniewice has shown the possibility for successful tomato culture from direct sowing in the conditions of Southern and Central Poland. However, frequent low tempera- tures in May can reduce the germination rate and final emergence, thus causing problems with the establishment of the uniform and dense plant stands re- quired for concentrated fruit maturity. A possibility of hastening the germina- tion and emergence under cool weather conditions would have a significant value for introduction of the drilled tomato culture.

Our paper presents results of work on differe~lt pre-sowing treatments for increasing the seed germination and seedling emergence of tomato under cool conditions. The work was aimed at getting physiologically active, but not ger-

120

minated, seeds which could be sown out in the dry state. The treatments in laboratory conditions included "priming" with polyethylene glycol (Heydecker et al., 1973, 1975; Heydecker, 1975 and personal communication; Bussell and Gray, 1976) and in dilute salt solution {Ells, 1963), soaking in fusicoccin (Lado et al., 1974; Ballio, personal communication), soaking in growth regulators {Braun et al., 1976) and priming in polyethylene glycol with fusicoccin. The best t reatments from the laboratory work were tested for emergence under field conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For both experiments seeds of cultivar 'New Yorker ' were used. In the laboratory germination experiment {Experiment 1) the pretreatment was per- formed by soaking the seeds in one of the following solutions:

(1) untreated control, dry; (2) polyethylene glycol " 6 0 0 0 " (PEG) a t - 7 . 5 bars potential, for 7 days at

20°C; (3) PEG as above with fusicoccin 10 -s M, at 20 ° C; (4) 1.5% KNO3 + 1.5% K3PO4, for 5 days at 24°C; (5) fusicoccin 10 -s M in H20, for 3 h; (6) fusicoccin as above and later germinated on filter paper moistened with

the same solution; (7) fusicoccin 10 -s M dissolved in acetone, for 1 h; (8) gibberellic acid 10 -3 M (GA3) dissolved in acetone, for 1 h; (9) a combinat ion of solutions: GA3 10 -3 M + kinetin 5 × 10 -4 M +

ethephon 3.5 X 10 -3 M, dissolved in acetone, for 1 h. PEG is a chemical reagent known also under the trade name "Carbowax".

PEG solution o f - 7 . 5 bars potential was made as reported {Michel and Kauf- man, 1973) by dissolving 242.5 g "Carbowax 6000" in 1 litre of distilled water. Fusicoccin, a diterpene glucoside with molecular weight = 680 (Ballio et al., 1968), was prepared by dissolving the substance in a minute amount of ethanol and then making up to volume with distilled water (Ballio, 1976, personal communication).

Seeds in Treatments 2, 3 and 4 were incompletely covered with the solution to ensure adequate aeration. Liquid lost by evaporation was mado up with water. After treatment, seeds were washed with distilled water and dried in an airflow at 20 ° C. All groups of seeds, including untreated control, were then placed for germination on 2 layers of filter paper in petri dishes. Each dish contained 100 seeds. Germination took place in darkness at 8, 12 or 15 ° C. Seeds were considered to have germinated when radicles were about 1 mm long. Germination was recorded daily until no more radicles occurred for 3 consecu- tive days. There were 3 replicates of each treatment.

In the field experiment {Experiment 2) a preliminary s tudy was made on the influence of seed pretreatment on seedling emergence in natural growing- conditions. Three seed pretreatments from the laboratory work were tested in

121

the field: (2) PEG alone; (3) PEG + fusicoccin; (4) 1.5% of both KNO3 and K3PO4. The experiment was located on a medium heavy podsolic soil, fertilized

prior to sowing with 112 kg N, 115 kg P2Os and 200 kg K20 ha -~. Seeds were sown in clumps of 10 seeds/clump on 2 May 1977. The distance between the clumps in the row was 25 cm and the spacing between the double rows was 100 + 35 cm. There were 24 clumps per plot of 4.05 m 2. Each t reatment was replicated 4 times in a randomized block design. Seedlings were considered to have emerged when the cotyledons were fully unfolded.

The weather conditions after sowing were unfavourable. High precipatation caused run-off and temporary water-logging prior to emergence on the ex- perimental site. Late spring frosts occurred on 26, 27 and 28 May with tem- peratures of - 0.1, -2.1 and - 1.0 ° C, respectively. The mean air temperature in May was 12.5°C and that of soil at a depth of 5 cm was 14.8°C.

Stat is t ical analysis. - - The values for germination from Experiment 1 and those for emergence in Experiment 2 were subject to analysis of variance. In Experi- ment 1 a single classification method was used, individually for the 3 tempera- tures 8, 12 or 15°C.

The analysis of Experiment 2 was made as for a randomized block design, separately for each of the determination times after 16, 21 or 29 days from sowing. The percentage of emergence was transformed before analysis into Bliss angles.

The border differences were calculated with the use of the Student test by the significancy level o f P = 0.01 for Experiment 1 and P = 0.05 for Experiment 2.

RESULTS

E x p e r i m e n t I. E f f e c t s o f pre - sowing seed t r ea tmen t s and t empera tures on germinat ion. - - As shown in Table 1, pretreatment of seeds had different ef- fects on the time to 50% germination. Most effective was pretreatment 3, PEG with fusicoccin, which significantly reduced the time to germination com- pared to the untreated check and to all other treatments except for PEG alone at 12 ° C. The next best pretreatment was 2, PEG alone, whereas 4, KNO3 + K3PO4, was the third best pretreatment. KNO3 + K3PO4 was, compared to PEG alone, significantly less active in accelerating the germination at 8 and 12°C. At 15°C the effects of both pretreatments were equal. The effect of these 3 pretreatments was most pronounced at the lowest germination temperature and, as shown in Fig.l , at 8 ° C this was observed with increasing intensity with the increase in germination from 25 to 75%.

Pretreatment 5, with fusicoccin in H20, resulted in a significant reduction in the time to 50% germination also, but to a much smaller extent than the

1 2 2

above mentioned pretreatments. From both fusicoccin in H:O treatments (5 and 6) the latter was the most effective. Permeation of seeds with fusicoccin via acetone (7) had no effect.

Pretreating with GA3 alone (8) or with GA3 combined with kinetin and ethephon (9) resulted, at 8 ° C, in a small stimulating effect on germination, but compared to other pretreatments, with the exception of fusicoccin in acetone (7), the effect was small.

The percentage of final germination of the untreated seeds (1) had a tenden- cy to increase with the germination temperature. All treated seed lots showed higher final germination at 8°C than the control seeds. These differences, however, were statistically non-significant.

Experiment 2. Seedling emergence in the field after different pre-sowing seed treatments. -- Data presented in Table 2 indicate that all pretreatments im- proved the seedling emergence, as compared to the untreated control. The differences were significant at recordings after 16 and 29 days from sowing. All pretreatments under field conditions affected the emergence to a similar degree and none of the 3 pretreatments was superior to another, as was ob- served in Experiment 1 with germination, and also in a test for emergence con- ducted in the greenhouse (Fig.2).

The lack of expected differences between the pretreatments might be due to the unfavourable growing-conditions ment ioned earlier. This is evidenced by the decrease in the number of seedlings in the time between the second and third recording and also by a relatively high experimental error.

T A B L E 1

Effect o f seed pretreatment~ and temperatures on seed germination of tomato cul t ivar ' N e w Y o r k e r '

Treatment Time to 50% germination Percentage of final ( days ) germination

8°C 12°C 15°C 8°C 12°C 15°C

(1) Untreated control 52.7 22 .0 9 .3 (2) P E G - 7 . 5 bars

for 7 days a t 20°C 19.7 8 .0 4 .0 (3) As above + fusicoccin 10 -s M 15.7 7 .0 3 .0 (4) 1.5% KNO~ + 1.5% K3PO 4 for 5 days

a t 2 4 ° C 28 .0 12.3 4 .0 (5) Fus i cocc in 10 -~ M in H 2 0 for 3 h 46 .0 20 .0 7 .3 (6) As above + germinated on f i l ter p a p e r

moistened with fusicoccin 40.0 17.7 7.7 (7) Fus icocc in 10 -s M in acetone for 1 h 53 .3 20.7 9 .3 (8) G A 3 10 -3 M

in acetone for 1 h 45.7 21.3 9 .0 (9) G A 3 10 - 3 M + k i n e t i n 5 x 1 0 - 4 M

+ e thephon 3.5 x 10 -~ M in acetone for 1 h 45 .3 20 .3 10.0

LSD, P = 0 .01 2 .33 1 .74 0 .92

80.7 94 .0 97 .0

92 .9 98 .0 95 .3 91 .4 93 .9 96 .7

93 .3 92 .6 94 .6 92 .5 96 .3 95 .8

83 .8 92 .7 93.7 82 .5 92 .9 94 .2

92 .2 93 .3 93.7

92 .5 99.1 98 .4 NS NS NS

123

T A B L E 2

Effec t of pre-sowing seed t r e a t m e n t s on seedl ing emergence of t o m a t o cu l t ivar 'New Yorke r ' in f ield cond i t ions . Sown on 2 May 1977. Mean air t e m p e r a t u r e in May 12.5°C. Mean soil t e m p e r a t u r e in May a t 5 cm 14.8°C. Las t spr ing frosts: on 26.5, - 0 . 1 ° C ; on 27.5, - 2 . 1 ° C ; on 28.5, - 1 . 0 ° C

T r e a t m e n t Percen tage of seedl ing emergence a f te r

16 days 21 days 29 days

(1) U n t r e a t e d con t ro l 4.8 18.3 12.8 (2) P E G - 7 . 5 bars

for 7 days a t 20°C 12.9 25.7 20.4 (3) As above + fus icoccin 10 -s M 15.7 24.4 19.9 (4) 1.5% KNO, + 1.5% K3PO 4 for

5 days a t 24°C 15.6 21.4 18.1 LSD, P = 0 .05 7,3 NS 6.2

j 6 0 L

[ b

4o}

un E 2

Control

KNO3 ÷ K3PO 4

~ PEG PEG * Fus

[ 25 50

Percentage germination

75

Fig.1. Ef fec t o f t o m a t o seed p r e t r e a t m e n t on davs f rom sowin~ to 2 5 . 5 0 and 75% ~ermina- t ion a t 8°C. Con t ro l = u n t r e a t e d ; K N O 3 + K~PO, = 1.5% of each KNO~ + K3PO 4 for 5 days at 24°C; PEG = PEG - 7 . 5 bars po ten t i a l , for 7 days a t 20°C; PEG + Fus. = PEG - 7 . 5 bars po ten t i a l + fus icoccin 10 - s M for 7 days at 20°C.

124

Fig. 2. Results of a greenhouse test on emergence of tomato seedlings after different pre- sowing seed treatments. Number of seedlings emerged out of 50 seeds after 10, 14 and 17 days from sowing for each pretreatment, respectively, is given in parentheses. (1) PEG -7 .5 bars for 7 days at 20°C (2, 35, 40); (2) as (1) + fusicoccin 10 -s M (13, 40, 45); (3) 1.5% KNO 3 + 1.5% K3PO 4 for 5 days at 24°C (7, 36, 39); (4) GA 3 10 -3 M in acetone for 1 h (0, 19,33); (5) GA 3 10 -3 M + kinetin 5 × 10 -4 M + ethephon 3.4 × 10 -3 M (0, 12, 31); (6) fusicoccin 10 -s M in acetone for 1 h (0, 7, 23); (7) fusicoccin 10 -s M in H20 for 3 h (0, 14, 33); (8) as (7) + germinated on filter paper moistened with fusicoccin (0, 14, 30); (9) PEG in concentration as (1) for 7 days at 15°C (0, 38, 44); (10) untreated control (0, 22, 34).

DISCUSSION

T h e r e s u l t s f r o m E x p e r i m e n t 1 r e v e a l t h a t s eve ra l s e e d p r e t r e a t m e n t m e t h o d s can p r o m o t e t o m a t o s e e d g e r m i n a t i o n u n d e r c o o l c o n d i t i o n s . H i g h e f f e c t i ve - ness was o b s e r v e d in t h e 3 p r e t r e a t m e n t s w i t h p r i m i n g o f seeds , w h e r e P E G w i t h f u s i c o c c i n ( T r e a t m e n t 3) was bes t , P E G a l o n e ( T r e a t m e n t 2) was s e c o n d a n d KNO3 + K3PO4 ( T r e a t m e n t 4) was t h i r d in a c t i v i t y .

T h e c o m b i n a t i o n o f P E G a n d f u s i c o c c i n ( T r e a t m e n t 3) m i g h t b e a u s e f u l a d d i t i o n t o t h e p r i m i n g t e c h n i q u e s w i t h P E G ( H e y d e c k e r e t a l . , 1 9 7 3 ) a n d w i t h sa l t s o l u t i o n s (El ls , 1 9 6 3 ) in w o r k o n e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f d r i l l e d t o m a t o c r o p s u n d e r c o o l c o n d i t i o n s .

P E G a l o n e a n d t h e s a l t s o l u t i o n s o f KNO3 + K3PO4 c o m p a r e d in s i m i l a r

125

work on tomatoes (Bussell and Gray, 1976) significantly reduced the germina- tion time also, but the order of effect was opposite and the salt solution ap- peared to have a better influence on time to germination than PEG. These authors, however, used a different PEG pretreatment than reported here (with soaking of seeds at 10 and 15°C) and this might be responsible for the lower effect of PEG.

The other seed pretreatments had relatively low effects and therefore seem to have no practical value.

The results from Experiment 2 point out that pretreatment of tomato seeds not only promotes the germination in laboratory conditions, but also increases the seedling emergence in the field. All 3 seed pretreatment methods resulted in similar effects in increasing the seedling emergence. These results for PEG or salt pretreatments are in agreement with earlier reports (Bussell and Gray, 1976), but do not fully confirm the results from Experiment 1 and the greenhouse test on emergence, where the best results were obtained with PEG combined with fusicoccin, whereas PEG alone and salt solution were in second and third place, respectively. The lack of differences in the effects of these treatments seems to be related to the abnormal weather conditions in the time from sowing to the last recording. Therefore, work on this problem is continued.

Nevertheless, our results suggest that proper tomato seed pretreatment can play an important role in early and uniform seedling emergence of drilled to- mato culture under cool temperature conditions.

ACKN OWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to Dr. A. Ballio, Professor at the University of Rome, Dept. of Biological Chemistry, for providing us with a sample of fusi- coccin.

REFERENCES

Ballio, A., Brufani, M., Casinovi, C.G., Cerrini, S., Fedeli, W., Pellicciari, R., Santurbano, B. and Vaciago, A., 1968. The structure of fusicoccin A. Experientia (Basel), 24: 631--635.

Braun, J.W., Rao, V.S. and Khan, A.A., 1976. Release of lettuce seed thermodormancy by plant growth regulators applied in organic solvent. HortScience, 11 (1): 29--30.

Bussell, W.T. and Gray, D., 1976. Effects of pre-sowing seed treatments and temperatures on tomato seed germination and seedling emergence. Scientia Hortic., 5 :101--109.

Ells, J.E., 1963. The influence of treating tomato seed with nutrient solutions on emergence rate and seedling growth. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 83: 684--687.

Heydecker, W., 1975. Seed priming -- the treatment of the future. Grower, Sept. 27. Heydecker, W., Higgins, J. and Guliver, R.L., 1973. Accelerated germination by osmotic

seed treatment. Nature (London), 246: 42--44. Heydecker, W., Higgins, J. and Turner, Y.J., 1975. Invigoration of seeds? Seed Sci. Technol.,

3: 881--888. Lado, P., Rasi Caldogno, F. and Colombo, R., 1974. Promoting effect of fusicoccin on seed

germination. Physiol. Plant., 31: 149-152. Michel, B.E. and Kaufman, M.R., 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol

"6000". Plant Physiol., 51: 914--916.


Recommended