c
The Ion Acoustic Decay Instability, and Anomalous Laser Light Absorption for the OMEGA Upgrade, Large Scale Hot Plasma
-Application to a Critical Surface Diagnostic, and Instability at the Quarter Critical Density
by Katsu Mizuno, J. S. DeGroot
W. Seka, R. S. Craxton
R. P. Drake and K. Estabrook
Applied Science
Univ. of Calif. Davis
Final Report
for Contract DOE FG03-95SF20716
Phone (916) 752-0360 Phone (510) 422-6891 E-mail [email protected]
DISCLAIMER
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or use- fulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any spc- cific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufac- turer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
DISCLAIMER
Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.
Table of Content
I. Introduction
II. Experimental Arrangement
III. Experiments
(a) Second Harmonic Spectrum
(b)
Anomalous Absorption of Laser Light
(a) Anomalous Collision Frequency
(b}
(c) Plasma Density Profile
(d)
Second Harmonic Emission vs Plasma Scale Length
IV.
Anomalous Attenuation of the Laser Light
Laser Light Attenuation Length, and Instability Width
(e) Two-Dimensional Electromagnetic Computer Simulation Results
V. Summary
References
3
5
6
6
8
11
11
12
13
14
14
16
16
2
I. INTRODUCTION
The Ion Acoustic Parametric Decay Instability (IADI)1, in which an
electromagnetic wave decays into an electron plasma wave (epw) and an ion
acoustic wave (iaw) near the critical density nc (where the electromagnetic
wave frequency equals the plasma frequency), is a fundamentally important
subject in plasma physics. It has been studied by numerous authors in laser
plasma interaction$-3, microwave experiments$, and ionospheric studies.
One of the main issues of the IADI in laser produced plasmas is to understand
whether or not it is important in the large scale plasmas relevant to laser
fusion. The IADI is important because significant hot and/or warm electron
heating can occur even when it is relatively weak, if the unstable volume is
large enough3. If it is excited, it has important applications as plasma
diagnostic in addition to anomalous laser light absorption, hot and warm
electron heating, anomalous enhancement of lateral heat transport, and
anomalous DC resistivity.
When electromagnetic wave excites an epw, the energy is deposited in
hot/warm electrons. Previously, hot electron heating was calculated5 in a
plasma irradiated by a high intensity laser (IL2-lxlO15-lO18 W-p.m2/cm2). The
IADI was excited at a steep plasma. The plasma wave amplitude was large, and
the instability width was small. The self-consistent plasma density was steep,
and the instability was localized in a small region. Because of the strong
excitation of the epw, a significant amount of hot electrons was heated even in
the small heating region. It was thought relatively easy to avoid the hot
electron heating since a high intensity laser were needed to heat them. In
contrast, we find that the IADI threshold is quite low and reaches
homogeneous plasma collisional values in a laser produced large scale
3
plasma.3 Because of the weak laser intensity, the epw is excited only
moderately. However, the density profile modification is also weak, and the
plasma density gradient is gentle near the instability region, implying that the
instability width can be large. The electron heating is mostly determined by the
product of the plasma wave amplitude, and the instability width (of the
interaction time of the electron with the instability). For high intensity laser,
we have a large amplitude epw, and a small instability width. On the other
hand, for moderate intensity laser, we have a moderate amplitude epw, and a
large instability width. An important point is that a relatively weak instability
in a large region can heat (hot and warm) electrons as much as a strong
instability heats them in a small region. When the IADI is excited on a shallow
long scale length plasma, relatively low intensity laser can anomalously heat
electrons . f It is shown that laser light can be anomalously absorbed with a moderate
intensity laser (Ih2-1014 W/cm2-pm2). in a large scale, laser produced plasma.
The heating regime, which is characterized by a relatively weak instability in a
large region, is different from the regime studied previously, which is
characterized by a strong instability in a narrow region. The two dimensional
geometrical effect (lateral heating) has an important consequence on the
anomalous electron heating. The characteristics of the IADI, and the
anomalous absorption of the laser light were studied in a large scale, hot
plasma applicable to OMEGA upgrade plasma. These results are important for
the diagnostic application of the IADI.
4
11. EXPERIMENTAL
We made the simi
ARRANGEMENT
lation experiments 1 sing the Jan s Laser
facility, which is similar to GDL system at University of Rochester. The
experiments were made with a large scale length, hot plasma, which
simulated the IADI in OMEGA upgrade plasma. Laser wavelength h L =
1.06 pm and 0.53 pm, the laser pulse length ZL = 1.0 nsec, and the
maximum laser energy 200 J. The laser intensity IL was varied from
1012-3x1015 W/cm2 by controlling the laser energy, and the spot size
independently. The laser normally irradiates a planar CH target. The
laser light was focused through an f /2 lens onto the target. The target
was thick enough (50pm) that no burn through was observed. We
measured the emission spectrum near the second harmonic ( 2 0 ~ ) of the
incident laser, which was collected at 1350 and 1800 from the axis of the
incident laser, and in the plane of the laser electric field. A focusing lens
of 2 inches diameter were used to measure the emissions near the
second harmonic. The signal was fed through a optical fiber into a
spectrometer. The spectrum was streaked using a streak camera. The
typical spectral and time resolutions are 1 A, and 30 psec.
5
111. EXPERIMENTS
(a) Second Harmonic Spectrum
4000 , I I I 8 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 8 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I , - - (61 - - - - - - 2000 : - - - -
FIGURE 1. Second harmonic spectrum: (A) IL = 3 x 1013 W/cm2, and (B)
2x1014 W/cm2.
We have measured emission spectrum near the second harmonic
of laser light in large scale, hot plasma. The IADI excites the epw and the
iaw, which satisfy the relation OL=Oepw + Stiaw, where oL, Qpw, and
Stiaw are the frequencies of the laser light, the epw, and the iaw. Two
electron plasma waves (oepw=oL-SLiaw and wepw'=oL-Qiawl) coupled to
produce an electromagnetic wave emission. The frequency is
approximately 2mppw = 20~-21(2iaw. In our previous paper, we reported
the IADI near the threshold, when it was excited weakly. When the
IADI is excited weakly near the threshold, we saw well defined Stokes
6
peaks. Figure 1 shows the second harmonic spectra for two laser
intensities; a weak intensity slightly above the IADI threshold, and a moderately high intensity. The left-hand peak is 202. signal which is
attributed to resonance absorption. The right-hand signal is a Stokes
signal emitted from the electron plasma waves excited by the IADI. A
sharp well-defined Stokes mode is excited with the weak intensity laser
irradiation (curve (a) in Fig. 1). The peak appears near the Landau
damping cutoff of the epw at kh& - 0.23. When the incident laser
intensity increases, the spectral shape is quite different from one shown
in curve (a). The spectrum becomes broad (curve (b) in Fig. l), and the
original Stokes peak is now barely distinguishable. In Fig. 1, the second
harmonic signals are plotted versus the measured wavelength Ah ( = h ~ -
h ). It is interesting to consider the horizontal axis as ~ P W . The Stokes
signal has a red shift by 2Qaw ( = 2kiawcs), where kiaw, and cs are the
wave number of the iaw, and sound speed. In our experiments, dipole
approximation is valid: 0 = kL = kepw + kiaw, or I kepw I = I kiaw I, where kL and kepw are the wave vectors of the laser light, and the epw.
The AA may be considered to be proportional to kepw when it is less than
the Landau damping cut off. Therefore, Fig. 1 indicates that the wave
number spectrum become broad as the laser intensity increases. The
spectral intensity was large at small k p w , and gradually decreased with
the increasing kepw. The measured spectrum is the results of the signals
integrated over the plasma density (0.8 w-nc), and the propagation angle
of the epw.
The spectral broadening of the Stokes mode is of interest. It may
be relevant to the degree of turbulence of the epw. In order to quantify
the broadening, we introduce a following definition. We define the peak
7
intensity of the Stokes mode as Imax, and the minimum intensity
between 2 o ~ and the Stokes peak as Imin. We can then quantify the
broadness of the Stokes mode using the value Imin/Imax. If it is nearly
one (or small), the spectrum is almost flat (or sharp). When laser
intensity was less than 2x1013 W/cm2, the Imin/Imax increased strongly
with the laser intensity. Above the laser intensity, the Imin/Imax
reached a value nearly equal to unity with Only moderately high laser
intensity. The spectrum was built up at smaller kepw to make a
uniform spectrum. It is also interesting to note that the peak value of
the Stokes mode moved towards smaller kepw as laser intensity
increased. The spectral intensity gradually decreases with the measured
wavelength ( or ~ P W ) as shown in Fig. 1 (b). The epw's with smaller
kepw interact with higher energy electrons because they have higher
phase velocities. These small kepw's could be either produced by the
mode couplings of the plasma waves (turbulent like spectrum) or excited
by the IADI at higher density.
(B) Second Harmonic Emission versus Plasma Scale Length
As shown in the previous pape3, the IADI shifted from
convective-loss regime to uniform plasma regime when laser spot size
increased. The IADI can be excited in a large volume. Hence , we expect
to see the increase of the IADI emissions. We have seen that the Stokes
intensity increases with the laser spot size. For the small spot of the
diameter D=100 p m, no Stokes spectrum was seen because the laser
intensity is lower than the IADI threshold (Notice that the IADI
threshold increased with the decreasing laser spot size). Only 2 0 , signal
8
is detected. When the laser spot size is large enough that the laser
intensity is above the IADI threshold values, the Stokes signal increased
with D. In order to keep the laser intensity constant, we increased the
total incident laser energy with increasing D. Therefor, we have
measured the normalized Stokes intensity ISto/n: (D/2)2, the Stokes
intensity divided by the laser spot area. The normalized Stokes signal
increased with the laser spot diameter D.
Although, we did not rule out other possible explanations, these
results may imply that the instability width LIADI increased (because the
plasma scale length increased) with D, so the measured Stokes intensity
(which is integrated over space in the instability width LIADI) increased.
The Instability width LIADI is an important parameter to determine the
anomalous laser absorption as is shown in the following sections,.
The IADI causes anomalous absorption of laser. It is shown in the
following chapter that the anomalous attenuation length of laser can be
shorter than the IADI instability width in a large scale length plasma.
Then, most of the laser energy will be absorbed by the IADI before it
reaches the critical surface. Therefore, resonance absorption which
happens close to the critical surface should be less important in a large
scale plasma.
We have measured the intensity ratio of Stokes mode to 200
signal vs laser spot diameter. The intensity ratio increased with the spot
diameter. The Stokes intensity increased much faster than 200 intensity
with the spot diameter. The value decreased strongly with laser spot
size. Notice that no IADI was excited with the laser spot diameter of 100
pm. The results are qualitatively consistent with the large scale plasma
9
where the laser energy is absorbed anomalously by the IADI before it
reaches the critical density.
The large reduction of the resonance absorption with plasma scale
length should not be attributed to the nature of characteristic resonance
function of resonance absorption. The fractional absorption of laser fA
by resonance absorption1 is approximately given by 92(2)/2, where $(z) =
2.3 z exp (-2z3/3) is the characteristic resonance function describing the
strength of the excitation, and z = (o~/c)l/%ine. The L is plasma scale
length, 8 is the incident angle of laser, and c is speed of light. The
optimum resonance absorption happens at z = 0.8. In our experiments,
laser is normally incident onto plasma through an f/2 lens. Hence the
maximum incident angle of laser is 140. The fractional absorption fA is
estimated versus plasma scale length L for the incident laser angles of
140, 70, and 3.50 using our experimental parameters. The optimum
absorption just shifts from large to small angles, as the value of L
increases. Therefore, we don't expect a strong reduction of the resonance
absorption as L increases, from the nature of the characteristic resonance
function.
10
IV. ANOMALOUS ABSORPTION OF LASER LIGHT
2 -= 10 a L 0.56 v* 4.1~10- x(-) cy_ Te
(a) Anomalous Collision Frequency Estimated from One-Dimensional
Particle in Cell (PIC) Computer Simulation
An important parameter to characterize anomalous absorption of laser light
is anomalous collision frequency v*. The anomalous collision frequency is the
heating rate of electrons by electron plasma wave. We have the definition of
the anomalous collision frequency.
We estimated the v* by measuring the temporal increase of the total plasma
energy density, dT/dt, using one dimensional electrostatic PIC computer
simulation code, where EL is laser electric field. Figure 2 shows the v* vs the
local laser intensity I (laser intensity at 0.9 nc) for a fixed plasma density, n/nc
0.9, which is the mid point between 0.8 nc, and nc, and it is slightly above the
0.86 nc, where the IADI is most unstable. We plotted the v* versus the
normalized laser intensity IhL’/Te. The swelling effect of the laser light was
included. The v* increases with IhL2/Te until the shifting point intensity of
3x1014 W-pm2/cm2keV, and above the intensity v* increases slowly. In the
moderate (laser) intensity regime below the shifting point, the anomalous
collision frequency scales as
11
0.1 I I
ox /a L
J 0.0 1 I I
1 0lS 1 014 1 0lS 1 o le
lh,2/T (Wpm2/cm2 key)
FIGURE 2. Anomalous collision frequency vs. the normalized laser intensity
IkL’/Te (W-pm2/cm2keV) obtained from one dimensional particle
simulations.
(b) Anomalous attenuation of the laser light
The transfer of energy from laser to electrons via the IADI (the rate of
energy loss from laser light) is given by u * E ~ 2 / 8 n . When we consider the
spatial problem, the (e-folding) attenuation length of laser energy 6 is given by
vg/u* in term of the group velocity vg of laser light in plasma. Therefore we
have
, which depends strongly on the anomalous collision frequency v*. In deriving
the equation (3), the group velocity of the laser light is assumed to be 0.37~ (c is
12
the speed of light), which is estimated at a plasma density n/nc = 0.86, where
the IADI linear growth rate has a peak value.
By combining Eqs. (Z), and (3), we can estimate the laser attenuation
length due to the IADI as
2 6 8 ILL -0.56 - 1.5~10 x(-) LL Te
For a simple estimate, we ignore the plasma density dependence of 'u *. This
simple approximation will be justified, since 6 <<LIADI as is discussed in the
following section. The accurate value depends on the detail of the density
profile, and local value of v*. The important point is that our simple estimates
indicate that the attenuation length of the laser can be much smaller than the
instability width as shown in the following section.
(c) Plasma Density Profile
We have made computer calculations of the plasma density profile using
the 2-dimensional LASNEX computer codeb. The calculations were made
using our experimental parameters: the 1.06 pm laser, with 1 nsec Gaussian
pulse, was focused onto a 50 pm thick planar CH target using f/2 lens (the laser
spot size was 500 pm). The laser intensity was 3x1013, and 1014 W/cm2, and
the flux limiter was f = 0.1.
The plasma scale length was long near the instability region. The
electron temperature was about 0.7 keV. It is well known that the IADI can be
excited3 at the densities 0.8 < n/nc 1. The lower limit density is determined
13
by the Landau damping cut off of the epw near the kepwkDe = 0.3 (kepw, and
hDe are wave number of the epw, and Debye length). Let's define the length
between nc and 0.8 nc as the instability width, LIADI. For the above
parameters, the length LIADI was quite large, about 30 ym for the both laser
intensities of 3x1013, and W/cmz.
(d) Laser Light Attenuation Length, and the Instability Width
We can now compare the laser attenuation length and the instability
width. For laser intensity 3x1013 W/cm2(1014), the electron temperature is
about 0.7 keV (l), so we have 6 / h ~ - 3 (2) using Eq. (4). On the other hand,
L I A D I / ~ L - 30 for the both laser intensities. The attenuation length is much
smaller than the instability width. Therefore, we predict without the accurate
spatial profile of v* that the most laser energy which reaches the instability
region is absorbed by the IADI. The absorbed energy is deposited to hot and
warm electrons.
(e) Two-Dimensional Electromagnetic Computer Simulation Results
These results are consistent with the calculations using the two-
dimensional relativistic particle and electromagnetic field simulation code
ZOHAR7. Figure 2 shows laser absorption versus LIADI. It shows that the
instability width LIADI of only a few laser wavelengths may be sufficient to
absorb most of laser energy. The ZOHAR simulations were made with high
laser intensities to minimize the numerical noise. However, v* saturates at
high laser intensity as shown in Fig. 2, sc that the results should be insensitive
to the laser intensity. In fact, when we increased the laser intensity from 5x1015
14
to lx1016W/cm2, no significant change of the absorption was seen. For
comparison, we plotted the theoretical values calculated using the v* given in
Fig. 2. The simple estimates give reasonably good agreements with ZOHAR
results. The important point is that there was no drastic change of the
anomalous absorption as laser intensity increased from 1014 to 5x1015 W/cm2.
100
80
60
4 0
20
0 0.1 10
FIGURE 3. The solid circles are fraction of laser absorption calculated by
ZOHAR simulations. The curves are the theoretical values for (a) : 5x1015
W/cm2 and 4 keV, and (b): I = 1014 W/cm2, and Te = 1 keV.
15
V. SUMMARY
3.
5.
6.
7.
In summary, anomalous absorption in a large scale plasma is quite
different from those of small scale plasmas. The Ion Acoustic Decay Instability
(IADI) may cause anomalous laser absorption with a relatively weak laser
intensity in a large scale plasma. The anomalous attenuation length of the
laser can be only a few laser wavelengths in width. These are consistent with
the 2-dimensional electromagnetic field computer simulation results. The
experiments indicate that the threshold of the IADI is low, so that the IADI is
excited on a shallow, long scale length plasma. The measured results of the
second harmonic signals are consistent with a strong anomalous absorption by
the IADI in a large scale plasma.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
W. L. Kruer, The Physics of Laser Plasma Interactions (Addition-Wesley, Reading, MA,
1988); K. Nishikawa, J Phys. Soc. Jpn. 24,916, and 1152 (1968).
C. Yamanaka et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30,594 (1973); K. Tanaka et al, Phys. Fluids 27, 2187
(1984); F. Dahmani et al, Phys. Fluids B3, 2558 (1991).
K. Mizuno et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 428 (1990); K. Mizuno et al, Phys. Fluids B 3, 1983
(1991); K. Mizuno et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73,2704 (1994).
K. Mizuno et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 271 (1984); K. Mizuno et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56,2184
(1986).
K. Estabrook, and W. L. Kruer, Phys. Fluids 26,1888 (1983).
G. B. Zimerman and W. L. Kruer, Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 2/51 (1975).
A. B. Langdon, and B. F. Lasinski, In Methods in Computational Physics, edited by J.
Killeen (Academic, New York, 1976), Vol. 16, p327.
4.
16