Date post: | 03-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | camelia-bordencea |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 1/16
THE KUBLA KHAN MANUSCRIPT AND ITS
FIRST COLLECTOR
HILTON KELLIHER
C O L E R I D G E ' S Kubla Khan, Or, A Vision in a Dream, first printed with Christabel
The Pains of-Sleep in 1816, has long been regarded as one of the great literary icons
the Ro ma ntic m ovem ent. C oleridge's famous accoun t of its conception in the summer
autumn of 1797 - the lonely Exmoor farmhouse, the effects of an 'anod yne ' , and tpoetical reverie interrupted by the arrival of a person on business from P or lo ck
contributed in no small m easure to the h ypno tic sway that it has always exercised ov
the imagination of ts readers. Awe and wonderment were, if anything, only increased b
the researches of J. L. Lowes and others into its sources, which proved to have stretche
far beyond the simple sentence in Purchas his Pilgrimage that was allegedly the immedi
inspiration.^ Yet thes e fifty-four ve rses were, the au thor later insisted, m erely
Fragment rescued from a broken trance in which images, rising up before him
things , had shaped themselves into a poem of two or three hu nd red lines. Some schola
have been sceptical, seeing in Coleridge's insistence on the dream -origins of the poea mere fiction masking his inability to complete it, though this line of argument
nowadays little regarded.
Rather surprisingly for an au tho r who left such a mass of papers behind him , th e on
manuscript text of the poem that is know n to survive is the a utograp h fair copy public
displayed for many years now in the British Lib rary galleries.^ T his first came to t
notice of scholars in 1934, and was a cquired for the nation in 1962 from the widow
the Marquess of Crewe who had inherited it from his father, the bibliophile Richa
Monckton Milnes (1809-85), first Baron Houghton.^ Milnes had bought it at auction a
Putt ick and Simpson's premises in Leicester Squ are on 28 April 1859, where it was l109 (fig. i) in the C atalogue of a Very Select a nd Interesting Collection of utogra
Letters. It shows a strange sense of values th at while the autograph of this, the mo
famous opium poem, fetched £1 15s Milnes had to pay £2 is for a two-page letter
1812 (lot 483) in which Southey lamented that Coleridge's drug hab it was 'inc ura ble
Market values at the time are put into further perspec tive by the fact that the D uche
of M arlb or ou gh 's allegedly auto grap h c harac ter of Qu een An ne (lot 359) cost M ilnes ̂ £
and a letter of Dry de n (lot 209) £7 los.' ' Of course, other things being equal, older item
have generally tended to realize higher price s; but we can only speculate wh at the un iq
manuscr ipt of Co leridge's most magical poem m ight fetch now adays.
184
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 2/16
I J A T 'S S A LE. 17
CoLEHiDGE (Samuel Taylor).
A utograph poetry, signed, 2 pages 4to. T hi s fragment with a good deal m ore not recoverable, compo sed, in
a sort of reverie hrought on by two gruns of opium, taken to check5 dysentery, 17 97 ; it comm ences:—
In Xannadik did Cubla Khan
A stately Pleasure om e
decreeWh ere Alpht the sacred river ran ^Hiro* Caves measureless to man,Down to a sanless sea.**
110 CoKQMVE (W illiam ) drama tic poet b. 1670, d. 1729A.L.S. , 1 page ^to., to J . K eally, Esq,, with seal June 7,
1 7 0 1 ^ ane? TERY
Fig. I. The 1859 sale catalogue description of Kubla Khan. S.C. Puttick 573, p. 17 (detail)
A fairly cursory examination of the contents of the Puttick catalogue reveals that itcomprised at least the major portion of a collection of autographs formed by Ehzabeth
Smith, widow of Thomas Smith, a Gloucestershire J.P. She was the daughter of Richard
Chandler, a wealthy woolstapler who in 1750 had built Constitution House at the east
end of Bell Lane in Gloucester, where she was born about 1770.^ Her husband, Thomas
Smith, was a native of Cirencester who had trained as a barrister, but 'from an
impediment of speech, did not make a public exercise of his profession'.^ The couple set
up home first at Padhill and then at Bownhams, or Bownham House, both near
Minchinhampton in Gloucestershire: later on they settled in a late eighteenth-century
house at Easton Gre y, near M alm esbu ry, in Wiltshire. ^ S m ith is described as well-
informed and liberal-minded, 'a gentleman and philosopher in his pleasures and habits;
a philanthropist and public character in his forms of living and acting'. He was
apparently known as 'The Maecenas of his Neighb ourh ood '.^ A fter his death on 31 May
1822 his widow sought 'consolation in books and business, for she attends to the details
of a farm which used to afford am usem ent and em ploym ent to him '.^ Sh e was 'a person
of muc h originahty of ch arac ter... a Un itarian, and therefore not m uch in sym pathy with
the ordinary county and clerical society, but was intimate both at Bowood with Lord and
Lady Lansdowne, and at Gatcombe with Mr. Ricardo. She had a large and valuable
library and collection of autographs, which were sold and dispersed at her death [on 6
January 1859], for she hved to the great age of ninety-two.'^** Easton Grey and the otherestates then passed by the terms of her husband's will to Graham Smith (d. 1871), eldest
son of his cousin Richard. It was presumably he who arranged, with considerable
dispatch, for the sale of her collection.
Chandler's second wife, Mrs Smith's stepmother, was an early friend of Maria
Edgeworth and the recipient of two letters of 79 and 1792 that are listed in the Puttick
catalogue (lots 214, 215).^^ In due course Mrs Smith formed an acquaintance with the
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 3/16
novelist who , during a visit to Easton Gre y in De cem ber 1820, wrote to her sister Hon or
in the most glowmg terms about the house and her hosts :̂
This house IS delightful - in a beautiful situation - with river - old trees - fine swells and val
and soft verdure even at this time of the year...The house, convenient, comfortable, perfect
neat , withou t the teizing precision of order - the library-drawing -room furnished with goo
sense - delightful armchairs low sofas - stools, plenty of moveable tables - books on tables an
in open book-cases and in short all that speaks the habits and affords the means of agreeab
occupation. In short Easton Grey might be cited as a happy model of what an English countr
gentlem an's house is or ought to be .. .M rs . Sm iths easy unaffected well bred kind manners an
Mr. Smiths literary and sensible conversation make their house one of the most agreeable I ev
saw.
Last night he read to us from a book of manuscript treasures two admirable letters
M ackintos h written when he was in India and addressed to M r W his haw ... M r. Smith al
shewed us some little unpu blished poems of Lord Byrons and some notes of his in a copy of Sc
Bards and Reviewers which do him honor and which Harriet has copied into our book so that yoshall all see them - in time.
Possibly she had by this time modified the view that she took in 1813 when viewing th
M ilton m anu script in Tr inity College, C am br id g e: ' I have not such delight in seeing th
hand-writing of great authors and great folk as some people have.'^^ During a furth
visit to Easton Grey in November 1821 she mentioned that the Smiths were 'connecte
by friendship with most of the literary people whom we know and with many whom w
do not k n o w - f o r instance Ho bho use - Bu rdett c. '. T he list also included Sydne
Smith, Francis Horner, Smithson Tennant, Francis Wollaston, John Whishaw and S
Samuel Romilly.^^ It is not surprising therefore to find both John Cam Hobhouse an
his friend Byron represented in Mrs Smith's collection (lots 70 and 279), though th
'little unpublished poems' of Byron are not listed in there. It is difficult to identify h
annotated copy of nglish ards and Scots Reviewers (1809, etc.) with any of the two
three now known: possibly it was the one sent in October 1815 to Leigh Hunt, who
him self repre sen ted in the collection by a series of letters to the pu blisher W illiam Butto
(lots 292-294).*^ Again, only one of the letters of Sir James Mackintosh (lot 353) seem
to have been in Mrs Smith's hands at the time of her death. Clearly the collectio
suffered losses as well as gains over the ye ars.
T h e ec onom ist David Ricardo (lot 35), who lived at Gatcom be P ark, near Stroud, ha
first met the Smiths at Haileybury early in May 1814. A letter that he wrote to T.
M alth us on 18 De cem ber 1814 included a plea:
I dined a little while ago at Mr. Smith's whom I first met at your house. Mrs. Smith told me th
she had a collection of the hand writing of a great number of men who had distinguishe
themselves by their writings, and she wished that I would give her a letter of yours to add to h
collection. Knowing that I had many which would not discredit you, I assented; but after
came home I thought I had no right to do it without your consent - which I hope you will n
refuse. ^̂
186
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 4/16
The result was the addition of an interesting document challenging the views of John
Stuart Mill on political economy (lot 355).^^ Clearly Mrs Smith's collection was already
well supplied by this date: most probably, as will shortly be seen, she had begun it more
than a decade earlier. Though this makes her one of the pioneers of the great age of
autograph-hunting, coeval with William Upcott and Dawson Turner, she is not noticed
by A. N. L . M un by , either in the main body of his study of this cult, or in the sum m ary
list of sale-catalogues given in h is appe ndix. ̂ ^ T h e explanation may be that, in her
provincial seclusion, only her closest friends knew of her collecting interests and enjoyedthe fruits. Ye t, thoug h the collection - at least in the state in w hich it reached the
saleroom - was far from being one of the richest of the time, ne ither is it wholly witho ut
interest.
The autographs reflect a wide range of talent in the fields of literature, drama, music,
politics and the sciences - more especially medicine and natural science. As one would
expect, they include a high proportion of contemporaries and not a few women writers.
But along with the specimens from warriors, divines and noblemen that were de rigueur
in all such collections there appear some items of a rather rarer nature, such as
autographs of Americans and dissenters. Mrs Smith's acquisitions came through threemain channels. As we have seen, some were letters addressed to her or to her husband
by eminent men and women who belonged to their circle; while rather more were
memorabilia of distinguished contemporaries that were obtained from or through
friends. The remainder consist of miscellaneous acquisitions, often of earlier periods,
apparently made by purchase from booksellers or at auction. Since the Smiths' social
circle centred on Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and the Bristol area, many of the items have
local origins or connections. The Marquess of Lansdowne seems to have been a kindred
spirit. Perhaps unfortunately for Mrs Smith, his brother and predecessor in the title had
in 1807 sold to the British Museum the famous collection of manuscripts formed by his
father, the first Marquess, who, as it happens, is represented here (lot 320) by letters
addressed to mutual friends.
Among other local residents who from time to time supplied material were the poet
William Lisle Bowles (lot 51) and the Wiltshire topographer John Britton (lot 487) who
mentions the Smiths in passing in his Beauties of Wiltshire ^^ T h e Bristol-educated
philanthropist John Kenyon contributed the only Wordsworth autograph (lot 542).
Several letters (lots 50, 303) are addressed to Dr William Adams (d. 1789), Master of
Pembroke College, Oxford, and a friend of Samuel Johnson. Adams was also a
prebendary of Gloucester; and his daughter, who had delighted Johnson by her
attentions during his visit to his old college in June 1784, married a Painswick man in1788 and became a near neighbour of the Smiths. We cannot be certain that the letters
written by Coleridge to his friend John Morgan (lots 105-108), who came of a Bristol
Unitarian family and lived nearby at Calne, found their way into Mrs Smith's possession
before Morgan's death in 1820. Although these local connections predominated,
acquisitions occasionally came from much further afield. In the autumn of 1818 the
Smiths were abroad, in France and Italy, where they met some eminent botanists.^ ^ The
187
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 5/16
catalogue includes a letter of introduction written by Alphonse de Candolle to GaetanSavi at Pisa (lot 128).
T h e Puttick sale occupied the afternoons of three consecutive days, from Th ursd ay 2
to Satu rday 30 April 1859 inclusive. Th e final hu nd red and forty-five lots (562-70 6) wer
apparently drawn from other sources; but the bulk of it seems to have consisted of Mr
Smith's own collection, in five hundred and sixty-one lots, that realized £206 is. Bueven here we must tread cautiously. One of the earliest datable items in the whole sal
denotes either a remarkably late acquisition, or, more probably, some infiltration by th
auctioneers of items from other sources - a not uncommon proceeding at the time. Th
letter of the younger Donne (lot 136) to an unidentified nobleman, dated simply
December, had been in the possession of the man-of-letters and collector Samuel Welle
Singer, and sold among his autographs on 3 August 1858 at Sotheby's (lot 39), when
was purchased by one Knight.
Other rarities are likely to have been genuine early acquisitions. A letter of Dryde
concerning Thomas Creech's translation of Lucretius (1682) was offered with a coverinnote dated 1811 from the critic Ed m un d M alone to an unnam ed co rrespondent who ha
su bm itted it for his opinion (lot 209). T hi s letter, first published by Scott in 1808, wa
still in the possession of Monckton Milnes's descendants in 1940.^^ The catalogue entr
records that 'S en din g an autograph of Pope to his corresponde nt, [Malone] writes,
have not a scrap of Shakespeare's handwriting, but I enclose a facsimile of hi
autograph ' . Since Mrs Smith's collection included a stray letter and receipt of Pop
(lots 421, 422), she seems fairly likely to have been the person addressed here. If so, h
hopes of a Shakespeare autograph, especially after the Ireland fiasco had drawn attentio
to their extreme rarity even in public archives, suggest at that comparatively early stag
neither a very informed approach to collecting nor, perhaps, much appreciation of th
likely market value of what she was seeking.
Eig htee nth-c entu ry literature was, not surprisingly, better represented than, that o
earlier periods, though not all the items were what they seemed. To Thomas Gray th
catalogue attribute s an 'Epig ram of M artial paraphrased, i page 8vo., containing 5 lin
in his autograph' (lot 254). This manuscript, which is in fact neither in Gray's autograp
nor apparently of his composition, passed by way of Sotheby's sale of 6 November 195
to the Bibliotheq ue M artin Bod mer at Geneva.^^ Robe rt Burn s was represented by
letter and some verses, both first published in Robert Cromek's eliques of Robert Bur
(1808), the originals of which are now lost.^^ Cromek was the engraver so despised b
Blake, who se 'e ar ne st wish to possess a scrap of the h an d-w riting of B urn s, originally le
to the discovery of most of the papers that compose' the Reliques , bu t unfortunate
the re is no thin g to link him directly w ith M rs Sm ith. ̂ ^ T h at she did co-operate wit
editors is clear from the fact that she allowed a further letter of Burns to be include
in the Aldine edition of 1839.^^ A collection of letters addressed to Garrick, with a fe
autograph specimens, was broken up into single lots (138-160) for the sale and widel
dispersed.
Som e of the most interesting and unusu al acqu isitions were kept to the end of the sal
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 6/16
These included two albums of dramatic (lot 545) and one of royal (lot 546) autographs,
uniformly bound in elegant dark blue morocco, all of which went to the bookseller
George Willis. The annotated and interleaved copy of Theophilus Cibber's Lives of the
Poets (1753) (lot 547) may be the one that had belonged to Isaac R eed a nd afterwards
to Jose ph Haslewoo d and is now in the British Library.^^ Tw o m ysterious lots (552 and
553) comprise novels by the anonymous 'authore ss of Arie l ' . Th e first, entitled 'T h e
Prophecy, or the Damsel of the Cross of Gold', in which the writer was 'assisted by the
Rev. J. T. James, Bishop of Calcutta' (d. 1828), was a manuscript prepared for the press.Whether this lady is to be identified with the 'Mrs Isaacs' who published Ariel or the
nvisi le M onitor in 1801, and her last known work in 1816, is unknown. Another woman
writer, though in a quite different vein, is represented by four volumes of 'Reflections
and Meditations, Moral and Religious' by Sarah Harrison of Daventry (lot 555).
Far and away the most expensive lot at the sale, however, may or may not have come
from Mrs Smith's collection.^^ It comprised the correspondence of the Rev. William
Broome relating to his own and Elijah Fenton's labours in translating Homer,
und ertaken on behalf of Alexander Pop e whose famous version of the Iliad appeared over
the years 1714 to 1720 and of the Odyssey in 1725 and 1726. T h e p rize item s here weresome fifty-four letters of Pope himself covering the whole period of the enterprise,
together with autograph copies of replies by Broome. On Broome's death at Bath in
Nov em ber 1745 his pape rs seem to have passed to the first Earl C ornw allis, and m ay have
come on to the market about the time that the direct line became extinct in 1824.^^ At
the Puttick sale the whole correspondence was bought by the publisher John Murray II
(1808-92) and eventually appeared in Elwin's and Courthope's edition of The Works of
Alexander Pope issued between 1871 and 1889 un de r his family im prin t. ̂ ^ T he y were
reprinted from this text in the standard modern edition of Pope's letters by George
Sherburn, as the originals were then no longer available.^** In 1859 this fascinating
archive fetched, at jCios, more than half of the sum realized by the whole of the
Smith collection. One would certainly like to know more about the bidding here.
Among all these items Kubla Khan remains the single most powerful literary relic. The
text occupies one and three-quarter sides of a quarto half-sheet of writing paper. In the
blank space on the verso, following the prose note at the conclusion of the poem, stands
an unsigned but contemporary pencil inscription that offers the only indication of its
early provenance. Th is states that the copy had been 'S en t by M ' S outhey , as anAu tograph of C ole ridg e' (fig. 2). A possible alternative reading 'M ' S ou th ey ' that has
been proposed by some scholars seems fairly certainly to be a misapprehension
occasioned by the colon und er the supe rscript ' r ' of 'M ^ ', the effect of which is
compounded by the presence of tiny flecks of foreign matter in or on the paper at this
point.^^ Precisely why, how and, above all, when did it come into Mrs Smith's
possession
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 7/16
. 2. The pencil inscription on the verso of ubla Khan. Add. M S. 50847, f. iv (deta
Robert Southey was a West Countryman and a native of Bristol, though part
brought up by his aunt in Bath. Moreover, thanks to his conversion by Coleridghim self an e rstwhile residen t of Bristol, he was a Unitarian.^^ T he se circumstances wou
have favoured his striking up an acquaintance with the Smiths, though precisely whe
and how is still uncertain. The earliest indication occurs in the letter that Southey wro
to Co leridge from Bristol on 14 M arch 1803, in which he remarked that it 'is nearly
week now since Danvers and I returned from Bownham...'.^^ All that we know of th
visit is that Southey was presented with a copy of Hayley's Life ofCowper a book whi
he described as 'the most pick-pocket work, for its shape and price, and author an
publisher, that ever appeared'.^^ Although he soon after returned to the Lakes, whe
he had taken up residence in 1800, he did not altogether lose contact with his hosts, an
confirmation of his gift of the Kubla Khan manuscript may be gathered from letters
Charles Danvers, the Bristol wine merchant who was his friend and freque
correspondent .
On 7 November 1803 Southey wrote that 'The Bownham letters came in the parce
I will make up something for ®̂ Smith soon - in truth I feel myself very much obli
to her her husband.'^^ Although this predates by mo re than a decade the mention
her collection m ade in Rica rdo's letter we may be confident that this 'som eth in g' was
be an addition to it. There followed a silence of three months before he returned to th
topic, remarking on i February 1804 (fig. 3):*'*^
9
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 8/16
j t^ y ^ r^ ^^c
Fig. J. Letter of Robert Southey, i February 1804. Add. MS. 47890, f. 189V (detail)
This very day I was going to write to M' ^ Smith when Madoc tempted me astray. / will do it
tomorrow £5 this is a promise. I will send her a fragment of Coleridges & my own poem on
Emmett. & withall a letter of such honest confession as shall obtain pardon for a very foolish
delay. Yet in plain truth the awkwardness of sending double enclosures has been a lurking cause
of this delay.
H e was as good as his wo rd , and on 2 F e b r u a r y he wro te to her in te rms ou t l ined in
the Puttick catalogue (lot 478):
He sends a transcript of his own Lamentation for Robert Fmmett 'as the last poem of
communicable length which I have written, and also because of the subject'. He relates an
anecdote of Em me t's escape from Ireland d uring the Rebellion,
there is a strange warp in everyIrishman's nature, they are all either wrong headed or wrong hearted, and the genius w hich they
almost all possess serves only to render them more mischievous'. It was his intention to have
published Madoc by subscription. *I have given up the intention, perceiving, as I had forseen,
that the attempt would be inevitably unsuccessful, and therefore, in some respects, detrimental.
However, the book will, in some shape or other, make its appearance in the course of the ensuing
winter. ' The poem mentioned in the letter accompanies it
The 'fragment of Coleridges', surprisingly not mentioned here, must have been Kubla
Khan While in 1859 the Emmet lament still formed part of the same lot as the letter,
Coleridge's poem had become separated from it, presumably because the arrangementof Mrs Smith's albums was largely alphabetical. It is evident that she had specifically
requested specimens of poetry: the fact that those sent were as yet unpublished would
have added novelty to the gift and a degree of exclusivity to her collection.
At any rate, on i March following Southey was able to report to Danvers that
My letter with its inclosures went to M* ̂ Smith punctually to my promise. - & will probably
induce a reply, as I offered my services when they come into the North in looking out lodgings
191
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 9/16
for them, if they will stay as long as they ought to stay to see the country well, & in directing th
route, & in showing them such things as might else escape their notice.
Three vertical and two horizontal folds still visible in the leaf may confirm that u
han was conveyed by post; and, although the only specimen available for comparis
(A dd. M S . 36467 , f. 293) may date from thirty years later, we may be fairly su re tha
was Mrs Smith's hand that added the pencil note recording its origin. Traces of gluethe foot of the verso probably came from its subsequent mounting in her album.
Further contact with the Smiths was envisaged at this period. On 17 February 18
Southey told his brother Tom that 'the Smiths of Bownham (who gave me Hayleys L
of Cowper) will probably visit the Lakes this year'.^^ In late Spring Southey was aw
from hom e, but had re turne d by 12 Ju ne , when he told
I was thoroughly wearied in London ... I had no time to look for the Smiths. Probably they w
let me know their appro ach that lodgings may be pro cured for th em , & you also will arrange
with the m , tha t you m ay me et. Sep tem ber is the best m onth , or even later, for beauty. If you co
du rin g the cloudles s w eather of full sum mer you lose the light & shades, the scene shifting
machinery of heaven which form so great a part of mountains magnificence.
By 2 July, however, he was imploring Danvers to 'come at once. About the Smith
know no thi ng . You can easily find them out and know their p lans, & regulate your o
accordingly'.^^ On 22 July he wrote that lodgings were available for Danvers and hims
at a little inn in Grasmere, and that Wordsworth would show them all the best walk
Southey added, however, that' Should the Smiths come with you the house at Grasme
will not have room'.^^ This is seemingly the last that is heard of their plans: whether th
ever came to fruition is not known, though a letter of August rather seems to suggnot. *^ Perhaps it is significant that in 1807 Southey sent Thomas Smith directions f
tourists in the Lakes (lot 480).
I l l
The first detailed examination of the Crewe manuscript was that published two decad
ago by Norman Fruman whose investigations brought into sharp focus doubts that h
already been expressed about the poem's genesis and the date, or rather dates, given
Coleridge for its composition.^^ According to the manuscript noteThis fragment with a good deal more, not recoverable, composed, in a sort of Reverie brou
on by two g rains of Opiu m , taken to check a dysentery , at a Farm House between Porloc
Linton, a quarter of a mile from Culbone Church, in the fall of the year, 1797.
In 1816 this was elaborated into the well-known account of its mystical conception, a
which the poet 'instantly and eagerly wrote down the lines that are here preserve
Fruman concluded that the variants between the sole surviving manuscript and
version eventually printed indicate that the evolution of this account was a piece
Coleridgean myth-making. Yet the testimony of Southey's covering letter has obvi
192
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 10/16
relevance here. In referring to Kubla Khan as a 'fragment' he clearly did not mean
merely a 'scrap' of Coleridge's handwriting. Rather he was repeating the author's own
definition of the poem, and one that is of especial significance precisely because it was
accepted by one of his closest friends at least as early as February 1804. In these
circumstances it would be more than interesting to know what more, if anything,
Southey might have said about the poem by way of introducing it to the recipient.
Unfortunately his letter, which was bought by the dealer George Willis for £1 12s,
seems to have gone to ground.According to the note in the manuscript, composition took place in 'the fall of 1797',
but in the Christabe volume the date given is 'the summer of the year 1797'. What seems
to be the earliest reference to the poem takes the form of a pun made in October 1798
by Dorothy Wordsworth in the journal that she kept during her stay with her brother
and Coleridge in Goslar. Here she speaks of 'carrying Kubla to a fountain' - KubeV
being the German word for a bucket- apparently in allusion to the 'mighty fountain'
of the poem.*^ (It is harder to believe that she intended a pun on Khan.) Later, in
December 1800, clear quotations from the poem were made in some verses written by
the actress and author Mary Robinson, ahas 'Perdita'. *^ Yet such is the continuinguncertainty that editors have been obliged to guess at either September—October 1797,
May 1798 or even October 1799. Where the available evidence is confined to two
witnesses, precise chronology is of vital importance in attempting to determine the
development of the text. Although we now know that th e uniqu e m anus cript of the poem
was in existence by February 1804, the question that inevitably suggests itself is w hether
this was of recent transcription. Was it, that is, written out by Coleridge at Southey's
prompting at or around that date, expressly as a presentation-copy for Mrs Smith, or
merely taken up from papers that were already to hand at Greta H all? If the former, then
it almost certainly dates from some time after Southey's letter to Danvers of November
1803: if the latter, further researches will have to cover the whole period as far back as
1797.
In the period immediately under consideration Coleridge and Southey were together
at Greta Hall only un til 20 Dec em ber 1803, when Coleridge visited the W ord wo rths at
Grasmere. Sickness caused him to remain there until mid-January. It is tempting to see
more than mere coincidence in an entry made in his notebooks during this time that
records his reading Wordsworth's copy o f Hakluytus Posthum us or Purchas his Pilgrimes,
by the very author whose earlier volume had sparked off Kubla Khan.^^ Moreover,
continuing traffic between Dove Cottage and Greta Hall is attested by his surviving
directions for the forwarding of some portrait-sketches of himself by two requests to his
wife to procure ink and by his concern that Southey had not yet received a book sent to
him.^^ At all even ts, a date any later than 13 Jan ua ry for copying Kubla Khan is highly
improbable since on that day he left for London and, shortly after, for Malta to take up
his new post as secretary to Sir Alexander Ball. He did not return to England until
August 1806.
On the other hand, it may seem unlikely that, ill as his own obsessive complaints show
193
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 11/16
him to have been, and on the point of departure from friends and country, Colerid
would have been disposed to gratify a request for an autograph. Indeed the wording
Southey s letter of i February 1804 might be taken to indicate a last minute resoluti
prom pted by conscience, and made in Coleridge s absence. Did Southey perhaps h
the fair copy already in his own possession, or did he seek permission to take it fro
among papers left by Coleridge at Greta Hall? If the latter, we should have to assuthat the author retained another copy, now lost, which served as the basis for the t
printed a dozen years later. This is hardly an insuperable objection, since the lines w
probably fixed in his memory; but we might do well all the same to ponder
implications of such a possibility as a means to explaining some indisputably author
but perhaps merely ccident l variants of a sort that might have been thrown up by
effort of recollection, or rather recreation, of the poem twelve years later.
Whether or not there remains any possibility that the copy originated at some earl
period altog ethe r, F ru m an s remark that as aids to establishing the date of
m an us crip t the test im on y of wa terma rks, paper, ink and han dw riting - all this am uc h m ore can neve r lead to a conclusive a nsw er is particularly unfortunate.^^ For
the absence of new documentary evidence these physical details remain of paramo
importance. The only practical hope for settling the date of copying would be
discovery, among other manuscript remains of Coleridge, Southey or even
W or dsw ort hs , of a dated or datable d ocu m ent written on paper of precisely the same ty
Fo r th e pre sen t, how ever, this remains m erely a pious hop e. T he blue-tinted paper
Kubla Khan m easu ring some 295 m m in height and 185 mm in width, was torn from
whole sheet of some 370 mm x 295 mm. The undated watermark bears a seated figure
Britan nia within an ellipse surm ou nte d by a crown , the chain-lines around it being spa
at 26 mm and the whole device m easuring n o m m in height by 73 mm in width
capital C, or more probably G, occurs within the double border of the ellip
imm ediately below the crown. Fo r w hat it may be worth, in the course of sporadic
fairly tho rou gh search of the m ajor caches of Co leridge s and of Sou they s papers in
British Lib rary , the Pierp ont M orga n Lib rary and at the Wordsworth Library
G ras m ere I have com e across no w atermark that m atches this one.̂ ^ Nevertheless i
not beyond all hope that the answering half of the sheet may still survive in a letter
other document. If so, study of similar marks suggests that it will bear as counterm
either the letters G R within a circle or ellipse, or else J C intertwined in a lozen
or perha ps a crown, w ith or withou t the legend G R above it.^^
So uthe y s part in the acq uisition of the Kubla Khan manuscript almost certai
implies that Coleridge and the Smiths were not personally acquainted in February 18
(It seems likely enough, however, that they would have had an opportunity of meet
in the years 1813-16, when he was living at Calne with John Morgan.) Even if this w
not the case, in view of his well-known dilatoriness in small matters it may still h
fallen to his closest companion at the time to fulfil an earlier promise of a specimen
his hand writing . Inevitably, So uthey s willingness to subm it to chores of this nature
not survive three decades of applications from the ever-growing ranks of relic-seek
9
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 12/16
In 1831 he complained that I have entered into a society for the discourage m ent of
autograph collectors; which society will not be dissolved till the legislature in its wisdom
shall take me asures for suppressing that troublesom e and increasing ^̂
A P P E N D I X
S E L E C T E D L I T E R A R Y A N D O T H E R I T E M S F R O M M R S S M I T H S C O L L E C T I O N
( P U T T I C K S A LE , L O T S 1-561
Boswell, James. Letter to Dr William Adams, Master of Pembroke College, Oxford; 21 Jan.
1785 (50). Original now in R. B. Adams collection. For further letters addressed to Adams, see
272, 303-
Bo wle s, W. L. Lette r to M r. Sm ith, n.d., with mem oranda and verses, in the autograph of Sir
J. C. Hobh ouse, on Lord B yron s attack on M r. B ow les (51).
Burns, Robert. Letter to Robert Ainslie, Jr, partly in verse; 23 Aug. 1787 (66). Original nowin Library of the Victoria and Albert Museum.
Letter to [Captain Riddell of Carse]; 16 Oct. 1789 (67).
Verses T o Terraughty on his birthday , beg. He alth to the Maxw ells veteran chief (68).
By ron, Lo rd . L etter to J. C. Hobhouse, A thens; 28 Feb . 1811 (70). Text and whereabouts
unknown.
See also, su b Bowles.
Clarkson, Thomas. Letters to Joseph Cottle; 11 Mar. 1825, etc. (102).
Letter to Richard Chandler; 24 Oct. 1791 (443).
Coleridge, S. T. Letters to J. J. Morgan, printed in ollected Letters ed. E. L. Griggs, viz:
27 Mar. 1812 (105). Coll. Letters no. 859.
16 July 1814 (106). Coll. Letters no. 944 (dated only *Late July 181 4 ).
7 Jan. 1818 (107). Coll. Letters no. 1093.
28 Jan. 1818 (108). Coll. Letters no. 1105.
Kubla Khan (109). Add. MS. 50847.
Co wp er, W ill ia m . Verses T o D octor Austen of Cecil Str eet , beg. Au sten, accept a grateful
verse from m e ; May 1792 (116). ^
D on ne , Jo hn , Jr . Letter to Lord ; 4 Dec. n.y. (136).
D ry de n, Jo hn . Letter rel. to Creech s Lucretius, n.d.; with covering letter of Edm und Malone
(209).
195
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 13/16
Edgeworth Maria. Letter to Mrs Chandler; 15 Mar. 1792 (215).
Garrick David. Letters to him, etc.; 1762-78, n.d. (138-160).
G r a y T h o m a s . Ep igra m of Ma rtial para phr ase d... containing 25 lines in his auto grap h (25
Pope Alexander. Poetical and other Scraps, the greater part autograph and original, with a f
printed papers; etc. a parcel (420).
Letter to Mr Cole, rel. to legal proceedings against one Corbet; n.d. (421). First printed b
Elwin and Courthope, Works, vol. x, p. 238, F ro m adve rtisement of an autog raph collection so
at Puttick and Sim pson s, 29th April 18 59 .
Sig nature to a printed receipt for subscription to his translation of H om er s Iliad n.d. (422
Co rrespon denc e with Broom e, Fento n, and oth ers, rel. to Pop e s H om er; 1713-26 (544).
R o g e r s , Samue l . Le tter to , sending an invitation to meet W ordsw orth; n.d. (439).
R og et , P . M . Letters to M r S mith ; 1819, 1822 (443).
Letter to Mrs Smith; 23 Oct. 1841 (6).
Scott, Sir Walter. Letters to John Murray, etc.; 1807-30, n.d. (451-4)-
Verses and songs (specified) by or in his han d; 1801, n.d. (455, 456).
Sloane, Sir Hans. Letter to John Locke, 25 Aug. 1694 (469).
Southey, Robert. Letters, 1797-1816 (476-486), including:
Le tter to Mrs Sm ith, enclosing Lam entatio n for Robert Em m ett ; 2 Feb. 1804 (478).
Letter to T. Smith, viz:
4 June 1807, 25 June 1807 (479, 480).5 Dec . 1808, rel. to S T C s com monplace-books (481).6 Fe b. 1809, rel. to S T C s prospectuse s, etc. (477).
2 June 1812, requesting transcript of Apuleius for Omniana (482).
I Ju ly, 8 July 1812, rel. to ST C s opium habit (483, 484).
20 M ar. 1816, rel. to ST C s play [ sorio}] (485).
Letter to Wordsworth; n.d. [1832?] (486).
W il li a m s , H el en M ar ia . Letter to Miss Smith from Paris ; dated 21 Florimel [Floreal?],
10 [i.e. 21 Apr. 1802] (539).
Wollstonecraf t , Mary. On poetry: i p . quarto (38) .
W ord sw ort h , W ill ia m . Letter to John Kenyon (542).
196
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 14/16
1 John Livingston Lowes, The Road to Xanadu
(Boston and New York, 1927); and Elizabeth W.
Schneider , Goleridge, Opium, and Kubla Khan
(Chicago, 1953).
2 Add. MS. 50847.
3 Announced by Alice D. Snyder, Times Literary
Supplement, 2 Aug. 1934, p. 541 , and exhibited
at the Lamb and Coleridge Centenary Exhibition
in the National Portrait Gallery, 1934.
4 British Library Journal, viii (1982), p. 28 and n.
75 Obituary in Gentleman^s Magazine (Mar. 1859),
p. 3 31, col. b; and see Transactions of the Bristol
and Gloucestershire Archaeo logical Society, lxiv
(1943), pp. 234-5 ^^d V G H Gloucestershire,
vol. iv (1988), p. 162.
6 Gentleman ̂ s Magazine (July 1822), p. 91 , col. b;
quoted in Lady Seym our ' s The Pope of Holland
House (London, 1906), pp. 6-8. See also Piero
Sraffa and M . H . D ob b (eds.). The Work s...of
David Ricardo (Cambridge, 1951^3), vols . v i ,p . 135, n. I, and v iii, pp . 56, 75.
7 In The Buildings of England series Bownham
House, Rodborough, is noticed by David Verey,
Gloucestershire, I: The Go tswolds ( Ha r m o n d s -
worth, 1970), p. 381, and Ea ston Grey by
Nicolaus Pevsner, Wiltshire, 2nd edn., rev. by
Bridget Cherry (Harmondsworth, 1975), p. 233.
8 L. G. H. Ho rton-S mith , 'T h e seat and manor of
Easton Grey, co. Wilts , and Tho ma s Sm ith , J .P . ,
T h e Maecenas o f h is Ne ighb ourh ood ' ,
Wiltshire Gazette, 5 Jul y 1934 (not seen).
9 Ricardo, Works, vol. ix, p. 264.
10 Lady Seymour, op. cit. , p. 8.
11 She was born Miss Evans, a niece of Charles
Carill Worsley of Platt Hall, Rusholme, and
married Richard Chandler on 28 Aug. 1791 at St
Pancras: see Gentleman s Magazine (1791), p.
774. Miss Edgeworth had first met her about
1781.
12 Maria Edgew orth , Letters from England,
1813-1844, ed. Christina Colvin (Oxford, 1971),
p. 227.
13 Edgeworth , Ghosen Letters, ed. F . V. Barry(London, 1931), pp. 178-9.
14 Letters from England, 1813-184 4, pp. 270, 271.
15 See Lord Byron, The Gomplete Poetical Works,
ed. Jerom e J. M cG an n, vol. i (Oxford, 1980), pp .
394-6 . The Hunt copy (4th edn., 1811) is now in
the Victoria and Albert Museum, as Forster
Printed Book 1267. An annotated copy of the
same edition, now in the possession of John
Murray, was reproduced in facsimile by the
Roxburghe Club in 1936. This and the set of
revised proofs that are now BL, Egerton M S .
2028 were both acquired in 1867 from the heirs
o f R . C .Da l l a s .
16 Ricardo, Works, vol. vi, pp. 164-5.
17 Ibid., p. 139, n. 2: ' In a note in the Economic
Journal, June 1907, pp. 273 -6, Professor Foxw ell
suggested that [the letter of M alth us to Ricar do,
9 Oct. 1814] may have been one given by
Ricardo to M rs Sm ith of Easton G rey for h er
collection of autographs (see pp. 164—5 ^^^ ^^9
below); this is the more plausible inasmuch as
M rs Sm ith's collection was sol d and dispersed
at her death in 1859 . ' See also The Pope of
Holland House, p. 8.
18 A. N. L . Munby , The Gult of the Autograph
Letter (London, 1962), passim.
19 Vol. iii (1825), p. 134, which in part is quoted
from Sir Richard Colt Hoare's History of Modern
Wiltshire (London, 1822—4).
20 Lady Seymour, op. cit. , p. 32.21 Charles E . W ard (ed.). Letters of John Dryden
(D urha m, N .C. , 1942), le t ter 7 , pp. 14-16, and
see notes, p. 149.
22 Roger Lon sdale (ed.) . The Poems of Thomas
Gray, William Go llins and Oliver Go ldsmith
(London, 1969), pp. 352-3 .
23 J . De Lancey Ferguson (ed.) , Letters of Robert
Burns (Oxford, 1985), vol. i , pp. 443-4, and
James Kinsley (ed.) , Poems and Songs of Robert
Burns (Oxford, 1968), vol. ii , pp. 571-2. These
were first printed in Cromek's Reliques of Robert
Burns (London, 1808), pp. 95-7 and 402-3
respectively.
24 Reliques, p. xi.
25 Letters of Robert Burns, vol. i , pp. 149-50.
26 Haslewood sale-cat., Eva ns, 16 De c. 1833, lot
286, bought by Wilkes, and now BL, Printed
Book 276.g.38-42.
27 It is given to one W eb b in the Alphabetical list of
some of the principal s ales of literary property
music and works of art conducted by Messrs Puttick
£5' Simpson ..., 1846 to 1870 (presented to the
Dept. of Printed Books, Bri t ish Museum, byJ. H . Puttick , 21 Jan . 187 1; a typescript copy,
1928, is press-marked C.i3i .k . i5) , p . 57. The
same name occurs in the margin of the BL copy
of the Puttick sale-catalogue.
28 Dictionary of National Biography , sub ' B r o o m e ,Wil l iam' .
29 Works, vol. viii (or vol. iii of the Gorrespondence)(1872), pp. 30-185.
30 George She rburn (ed.) , Gorrespondence of
197
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 15/16
Alexander Pope, 5 vols. (Oxford, 1956); and see
Index of English Literary Manuscripts, vol. iii,
1700-1800, Part 3 , ed . Margaret M. Smith and
Alexander Lindsay (L ondo n, 1992), pp. 13-15.
31 T . C . Skea t , 'Ku b la K ha n ' , British Museum
Qitarterly, xxvi, nos. 3-4 (1963), pp. 77-83 (see
esp . p . 82 , n . 4 ) , th o ug h t ' M ^ . .. a much m oreprobable reading ' . The al ternative view was
taken by Joh n Shelton in 'T h e Autograph
M anuscr ip t o f K ub la Khan and an In te rp re t -
a t i o n ' , Review of English Literature, vii, no. i
(Jan. 1966), pp. 32-42.
32 Lette rs of the Unitar ia n m inis ter Th om as
Belsham , addressed both to Th om as Sm ith and
to his wife in 1806, are found in the collection
(lot zi).
7^ C. C. Southey (ed.) . Life and Correspondence of
Robert Southey (184 9-50 ), vol. ii , p. 20 1, where
'R ow nh am ' is p r in ted in e r ro r fo r 'Bow nha m ' .
34 Ibi d., p. 203.
35 B L, A dd. M S . 30928, f. 37V.
36 B L, Add . M S . 47890, f 189V.
37 B L, A dd. M S . 30928, f. 41V.
38 B L, Add. M S . 30927, f. io6v.
39 BL , Ad d. M S . 47890, f. 197.
40 Ibid., f. 199.
41 BL , Add. M S . 30928, f 45V.
42 Ibid., f 47V.
43 Coleridge, The Dam aged Archangel (London ,
1972), ch. 22, pp. 334-50, and notes, pp. 537-54-
44 E. de Selincourt (ed.) . Journals of Do rothy
Wordsworth (London, 1941), vol. i , p. 34.
45 Robinson , Memoirs (London, 1801), vol. iv, pp.
145-9-
46 Desp i te Ka th leen Coburn {Notebooks of Sam
Taylor Coleridge, vol. i (London, 1957), No
#1840, 16.223), the catalogue of Wordswor
books makes no mention of this four-volu
work, but only of Purchas his Pilgrimage,
edn. (London, 1617), of which incidenta
Coleridge's own copy is now in the LibraryWorcester College, Oxford. See Chester L.
Alice C. Shaver, Wordsworth s Library: A C
lo u (New York and Lo nd on , 1979), p. 208;
Ralph J. Coffman, Coleridge s Library (Bos
1987), p. 169.
47 Coleridge, Collected Letters, ed. E. L. Gr
(Oxford, 1956-71), vol. ii , pp. 1024-8, Let
531-3-
48 Op. cit. , p. 541, n. 23.
49 Cf. Edward Heawood, Watermarks Mainly of
ijth and i8th Ce nturies (Hilversum, 1950),213, which is dated 1794 and counter-mar
'G R ', thou gh the source is said to have bee
letter written in 1799.
50 Cf., respectively , letters of Coleridge to Pool
BL , Ad d. M S . 35343, f. 89 (dated 30 M
1796); f. 274 (18 Apr. 1801); f. 106 (29 M
1796); and f. 91 ( I I Apr. 1796). Th ere is so
possibility that the present mark matches
found in the fragmentary letter of August 18
now Dov e Cottage M S . 32, p. 11 {Coll
Letters, no. 454a), seen by the writer many y
ago.
51 Lives of the U neducated Poets (1831), ed. J
Childers (London, 1925), p. 168, quoted by
N . L. Munby, op. cit. , p. 10.
198
8/12/2019 The Kubla Khan Manuscript and Its First Collector
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kubla-khan-manuscript-and-its-first-collector 16/16