DOCUMENT RCSUME
ED 026 164 RC 003 037By-Selinger, Alphonse D.The American Indian High School Dropout: The Magnitude of the Problem.Northwest Regional Educational Lab., Portland, Ore9.Spons Agency-Bureau of Indian Affairs (Dept. of Ins-erior), Washington, D.C.Pub Date Sep 68Note-176p.EDRS Price MF-$0.75 HC-$8.90Descriptors-*American Indians, *Comparative Statistics, Dropout Rate, *Dropout Research, Dropouts,Educational Research, Ethnic Groups, Low Ability Students, Persistence, Sampling, School Statistics,*Secondary Grades, State Surveys, *Statistiral Data
Identifiers-Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, WashingtonThe magnitude of the dropout problem among Indians was illustrated by a study
which followed students registered in grade 8 as of November 1962 through June1967. Statistics were gathered by area, state, type of school, tribal group, andmajority-minority position of Indian students in the 6-state area of Oregon,Washington, Idaho, Montana, South Dakota, and North Dakota. Related researchdealing with Indian dropouts was used as a framework for the data and as a basisfor comparison. No attempt was made to interpret the findings of the study since theprimary aim was to provide a base for future research into to extent of the problemof American Indian high school dropouts. (DA)
e4t,
''
'4r*
Alexander Junior High SchoolMAKAHNeah Bay Elemuntary School
Moc lips Junior High School
SWINOMISH
QUINAULTTULALIP Copp le Junior High School
COLVILLENespelem Eimentary School
Inchelium Elementary SchoolSPOKANE
Elementary School
Washington
\YAKIMA
Browning
-Asa
.1
BLACKFCutbank-
FLATHEAD
Ronan Elementary SchoolWapato Junior High &hool
COEURD'ALENE
St. Ignatius Elementary
Lapwai Junior High School
NEZ PERCE
Helen McCune Junior High School sr.",tr-tUMATILLA
C3WA11M SPRINGS
*Madras Junior High Sc.-hool
Idaho
FORTHALL
Hawthorne Junior High
rwimme.was.. =wTHE AMERICAN INDIANHIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT:The Magnitude of the Problem.=1
..
BLACKFEETCutbank Junior High School
Havre Junior High School
ROCKY BOYS
Hays Elementary Schoolentary School St. Paul Mission School
Elementary School
Montana
FORTBELKNAP
CROW
Poplar Elementary School
Hardin Junior High SchoolBusby Elementary School
NORTHERN McIntosh Elementary SchoolCHEYENNE i STANDING ROCK I
LkGrass Elementary School
i1
-
--7111w4St. Ana's Mission School nit TURTLE MOUNTAIN
NPw Town Elementary School
FORT BERTHOLDt.10-"*--'..-"
Fort Totten Elementary School
DEVILS LAKE
North Dakota
i.' Mr.ndaree High School
STANDING ROCKStanding Rock Community School
- sisseion Elementary SchoollLittle ale Day School Teltakwitiia
Indian Children's Home
South Dakota
SISSETON\/,
Pierre Boarding SchoolImmaculate Conception SchoolROW CREEK FLANDREAU 0
LOWER BRULE
LLe Junior High School ROSEBUD
Todd County Elementar SchoolHe Dog School \
St. Francis Mission School
St. Joseph's Indian School
YANKTONPine Ridge Elementary SchoolHoly Rosary Mission School
Locations of Forty Target Schools
THE AMERICAN INDIANHIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT:The Magnitude of the Problem
1
THE AMERICAN INDIANHIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT:The Magnitude of the Problem
By: Alphonse D. SelingerStudy Director
Edward C. Johnson, Study C:)-Director
U.S. DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE
OFFICE OF EDUCATION
THIS DOCUMEV1 HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE
PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT. POINTS Of VIEW OR OPIRIONS
STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE Of EDUCATION
POSITION OR )0LICY.
Consultants:
Robert R. Rath, Coordinator, Intercultural Programs
Michael C. Giammatteo, Research & Development Specialist
NORTHWEST REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LABORATORY
The Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory is a nonprofitcorporation working with more then eight hundred member institu-tions in the Northwest United States to apply the findings ofresearch and technoloffical development to improve educationalpractice. This study is a part of the efforts of the Laboratory todevelop and disseminate data and conceptualizations useful in eval-uating and designing improvements in intercultural education. Theresearch reported herein was performed pursuant to a contractwith the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs.
A publication of
NORTHWEST REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LABORATORY
4CC` Lindsay Building, 710 S. 1/17 Second Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97204
September, 1968
Acknowledgments
The research reported in this study was financed through a contract
with the Bureau of Indian Affairs, U. S. Department of the Interior.
To begin to thank individually the several hundred people who
cooperated in this research project would be an enormous task. We are
particularly indebted to all the superintendents, principals and teachers,
personnel (with agencies and area offices) of the Bureau of Indian Affairs,
tribal office officials and employees, staff members of State Departments
of Education, and the parents and relatives of many of the pupils. Without
their cooperation and assistance, this project would have been impossible.
Drs. Robert Rath and Michael Giammatteo of the Laboratory
contributed invaluable assistance in the formulation of the study, and in the
encouragement and suggestions which they offered at various times during
the course of the project.
Ed Johnson, study Co-Director, was particularly helpful in
establishing field contacts and in the collection of the data.
Appreciation is du.e Gary Echternacht, Research Statistician, for
suggestions on handling the data and for supervision of the coding; also to
the staff of the Laboratory Computer Division who frequently disrupted their
work schedules in order to work on this project.
Appreciation is also due Dan Stephens for execution of the cover
design and to him and other members of the Laboratory Communications
Division for review and suggestions regarding the format of this report. The
careful and meticulous work of Mrs. Bonnie Rosen in typing the final copy,
particularly the figures and tables, is gratefully acknowledged.
Finally, to Mrs. Isobel Rooney, Project Secretary, we express our
deep indebtedness. She served cheerfully and efficiently in managing the
detail of the office and the project, in assisting in data colis3ction and checking
its accuracy, and generously ministering to our needs while acting as factotum.
September, 1968Northwest Regional Educational LaboratoryPortland, Oregon
Al Se linger
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part
I. DTTRODUCTION. .
II.
Research Objectives .
Related Literature .
Research ProceduresSample. . .
Statistical Data on StudentsReferences .
FINDINGS . .
. .
Oregon . . .
Washington .
Idaho . 4
Montana . .
North DakotaSouth DakotaSummary of Dropout Rate in the Six-State Area .
Racial Balance by State in the Schools Includedin the Study . .
rn. CONCLUSION .
APPENDIX A:
APPENDIX B:
School Directory .
Directory of Tribes
±a4 wo--,.-rn
Page
1
1
2
5
6
7
8
9
111840478197
137
138
1
Ii
Li
I
: I
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. Progressive Dropout Rate by Percentages to June, 1967,From a Target Population of American Indian StudentsEnrolled in Helen McCune Junior High School, Oregonin Grade Eight, November, 1962 . . . 12
2. Average Annual Attendance by Percentages to June, 1967,of Dropouts and Persisters From a Target Populationof 4 American Indian Students Enrolled in Helen McCuneJunior High School, Oregon in Grade Eight, November,1962. . 13
3. Average Annual Grades Translated to Letter Gradings toJune, 1967, From a Target Population of 4 AmericanIndian Students, Dropouts and Persisters, Enrolled inHelen McCune Junior High School, Oregon in GradeEight, November, 1962 . . 13
4. Progressive Dropout Rate, Madras Junior High School,Oregon. . . 15
5. Average Annual Attendance, Madras Junior High School,Oregon (N = 38) . . . 16
6. Average Annual Grades, Madras Junior High School,Oregon (N = 38) . .
7. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Students trJune, 1967, From a Sample of Oregon Schools EnrollingTen or More Indian Students in Grade Eight as ofNovember, 1962 (N = 42) . . 17
8. Progressive Dropout Rate, Alexander Junior High School,Washington . 19
9. Average Annual Attendance, Alexander Junior High School,Washington (N = 14) . . 20
Table
10.
11.
12.
15.
16.
17.
18
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Average Annual Grades, Alexander Junior High School,
Page
Washington (N = 14) . . . 20
Progressive Dropout Rate, Copp le Junior High School,Washington . . . 22
Average Annual Attendance, Copp le Junior High School,Washington (N = 9) . . . 23
Average Annual Grades, Copp le Junior High School,Washington (N = 9) . . . . . 23
Progressive Dropout Rate, Inchelium Elementary School,Washington . . 25
Average Annual Attendance, Inchelium Elementary School,Washington (N = 7) . . . . . . 26
Average Annual Grades, Inchelium Elementary School,Washington (N = 7) . . 26
Progressive Dropout Rate, Moclips Junior High School,Washingthn . . . 28
Average Annual Attendance, Moclips Junior High School,Washington (N = 7) . . . 29
Average Annual Grades, Moclips Junior High School,\Washington (N = 7) . . . . 29
Progr,essive Dropout Rate, Neah Bay Elementary School,Washington . 31
Average Annual Attendance, Neah Bay Elementary School,Washington (N = 10) . . . 32
Average Annual Grades, Neah Bay Elementary School,Washington (N = 10) . . . .
Progressive Dropout Rate, Nespelem Elementary School,Washington . .
24. Average Annual Attendance, Nespelem Elementary School,Washington (N = 23) . . 35
Table Page
25. Average Annual Grades, Nespelem Elementary School,Washington (N = 23) . 35
26. Progressive Dropout Rate, Wapato Junior High School,Washington . 37
27. Average Annual Attendance, Wapato Junior High School,Washington (N = 21) 38
28. Average Annual Grades, Wapato Junior High School,Washington (N = 21) . . 38
29. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Students,to June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of WashingtonSchools Enrolling Ten or More Indian Students inGrade Eight as of November, 1962 (N = 91). 39
30. Progressive Dropout Rate, Hawthorne Junior High School,Idaho 41
31. Average Annual Attendance, Hawthorne Junior High School,Idaho (N = 10)
32. Average Annual Grades, Hawthorne Junior High School,Idaho (N = 10)
33. Progressive Dropout Rate, Lapwai Junior High School,Idaho .
. . 42
. 42
44
34. Average Annual Attendance, Lapwai Junior High School,Idaho (N = 23) .
35. Average Annual Grades, Lapwai Junior High School,Idaho (N = 23) . .
. 45
45
36. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of Idaho SchoolsEnrolling Ten or More Indian Students in Grade Eightas of November, 1962 (N = 33) . 46
37. Progressive Dropout Rate, Browning Elementary School,Montana . ,1 48
38. Average Annual Attendance, Browning Elementary School,Montana (N = 79) . . . 49
Table Page
39. Average Annual Grades, Browning Elementary School,lVlontana (N = 79) . . 49
40. Progressive Dropout Rate, Busby Elementary School,Montana. . . . . 51
41. Average Annual Attendance, Busby Elementary School,Montana (N = 20) . . . .11. 52
42. Average Annual Grades, Busby Elementary School,1
Montana (N = 20) . . . . . . 52 1
.,43. Progressive Dropout Rate, Cut Bank Junior High School, 1
Montana . . . 54
44. Average Annual Attendance, Cut Bank Junior High School,Montana (N = 6) . . . . 55
45. Average Annual Grades, Cut Bank Junior High School,Montana (N = 6) . . . 55
46. Progressive Dropout Rate, Hardin Junior High School,Montana . . . 57
47. Average Annual Attendance, Hardin Junior High School,Montana (N = 17) . . 58
48. Average Annual Grades, Hardin Junior High School,Montana (N = 17) . 58
49. Progressive Dropout Rate, Havre Junior High School,Montana . . . 60
50. Average Annual Attendance, Havre Junior High School,Montana (N = 24) . . . 61
51. Average Annual Grades, Havre Junior High School,Montana (N = 24) . . 61
52. Progressive Dropout Rate, Hays Elementary School,Montana . . .. . 63
53. Average Annual Attendance, Hays Elementary School,Montana (N = 18) . . . 64
Table Page
54. Average Annual Grades, Hays Elementary School,Montana (N = 18) .
55. Progressive Dropout Rate, Lodge Grass ElementarySchool, Montana. . .
56. Average Annual Attendance, Lodge Grass ElementarySchool, Montana (N = 24). .
57. Average Annual Grades, Lodge Grass ElementarySchool, Montana (N = 24). .
. . 66
67
67
58. Progressive Dropout Rate, Poplar Junior High School,Montana . . . . 69
59. Average Annual Attendance, Poplar Junior High School,Montana (N = 39) . . . 70
60. Average Annual Grades, Poplar Junior High School,Montana (N = 39) . . 70
61. Progressive Dropout Rate, Ronan Elementary School,'Montana . . 72
62. Average Annual Attendance, Rona:n Elementary School,Montana (N = 11) . . 73
63. Average Annual Grades, Ronan Elementary School,Montana (N = 11) . . 73
64. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Ignatius ElementarySchool, Montana. . 75
65. Average Annual Attendance, St. Ignatius ElementarySchool, Montana (N = 9) . . 76
66. Average Annual Grades, St. Ignatius ElementarySchool, Montana (N = 9) . 76
67. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Paul's Mission School,Montana.
78
68. Average Annual Attendance, St. Paul's Mission School,Montana (N = 12) . 79
Table Page
69. Average Annual Grades, St. Paul's Mission School,Moncana (N = 12) . . . 79
70. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of MontanaSchools Enrolling Ten or More Indian Students inGrade Eight as of November 1962 (N = 259) . . . 80
71. Progressive Dropout Rate, Ft. Totten ElementarySchool, North Dakota .
72. Average Annual Attendance, Ft.. Totten ElementarySchool, North Dakota (N = 10) . .
. 82
83
73. Average Annual Grades, Ft. Totten Elementary School,North Dakota (N = 10) . . . 83
74. Progressive Dropout Rate, Ft. Yates ElementarySchool, North Dakota . 85
75. Average Annual Attendance, Ft. Yates ElementarySchool, North Dakota (N = 37) . 86
76. Average Annual Grades, Ft. Yates Elementary School,North Dakota (N = 37) . 86
77. Progressive Dropout Rate, Mandaree High School,North Dakota . . 88
78. Average Annual Attendance, Mandaree High School,North Dakota (N = 10) .
79. Average Annual Grades, Mandaree High School,North Dakota (N = 10) .
. 89
. . 89
80. Progressive Dropout Rate, New Town Elementary School,North Dakota . 91
81. Average Annual Attendance, New Town ElementarySchool, North Dakota (N = 12) . 92
82. Average Annual Grades, New Town Elementary School,North Dakota (N = 12) 92
Table Page
83. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Ann's Mission School,North Dakota. . . . 94
84. Average Annual Attendance, St. Arm's Mission School,North Dakota (N = 30) . . 95
85. Average Annual Grades, St. Ann's Mission School,North Dakota (N = 30) . . . 95
86. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of NorthDakota Schools Enrolling Ten or More Indian Studentsin Grade Eight as of November, 1962 (N = 99), . . 96
87. Progressive Dropout Rate, He Dog School, SouthDakota . . . . 98
88. Average Annual Attendance, He Dog School, SouthDakota (N = 12) . . . 99
89. Average Annual Grades, He Dog School, South Dakota(N = 12) . . . 99
90. Progressive Dropout Rate, Holy Rosary Mission School,South Dakota . . . 101
91. Average Annual Attendance, Holy Rosary Mission School,South Dakota N = 50) . . 102
92. Average Annual Grades, Holy Rosary lvTission School,South Dakota (N = 50) . . . 102
93. Progressive Dropout Rate, Immaculate ConceptionMission School, South Dakota . . . 104
94. Average Annual Attendance, Immaculate ConceptionMission School, South Dakota (N = 22) . 105
95. Average Annual Grades, Immaculate Conception MissionSchool, South Dakota (N = 22) . 105
96. Progressive Dropout Rate, Little Eagle Day School,South Dakota . . . 107
t.
Table Page
97. Average Annual Attendance, Little Eagle Day School,South Dakota (N = 10) . . . . . . 108
98. Average Annual Grades; Little Eagle Day School,South Dakota (N = 10) . . . . . . . . 108
99. Progressive Dropout Rate, McIntosh Elementary School,South Dakota .
100. Average Annual Attendance, McIntosh Elementary School,South Dakota (N = 8) . .
101. Average Annual Grades, McIntosh Elementary School,South Dakota (N = 8) . . . . . . .
102. Progressive Dropout Rate, Pierre Boarding School,South Dakota . .
. 110
. . . 113
103. Average Annual Attendance, Pierre Boarding School,South Dakota (N = 70) . . . . . 114
104. Average Annual Grades, Pierre Boarding School,South Dakota (N = 70) . . . . . . 114
105. Progressive Dropout Rate, Pine Ridge Public School,South Dakota . .
106. Average Annual Attendance, Pine Ridge Public School,South Dakota (N = 11) . . . .
107. Average Annual Grades, Pine Ridge Public School,South Dakota (N = 11) . .
. . . . 116
. . . . 117
. . . . 117
108. Progressive Dropout Rate, Porcupine Day School,South Dakota . . . . . . . . 119
109. Average Annual Attendance, Porcupine Day School,South Dakota (N = 14) . . . . . . 120
110. Average Annual Grades, Porcupine Day School,South Dakota (N = 14) . . . . . . 120
111. Progressive Dropout Rate, Sisseton Elementary School,South Dakota . . . . . 122
Table Page
112. Average Annual Attendance, Sisseton ElementarySchool, South Dakota (N = 12) .
113. Average Annual Grades, Sisseton Elementary School,South Dakota (N = 12) . . . 123
114. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Francis Mission School,South Dakota . . . 125
115. Average Annual Attendance, St. Francis Mission School,South Dakota (N = 23) . 126
116. Average Annual Grades, St. Francis Mission School,South Dakota (N = 23) . . . . 126
117. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Joseph's Mission School,South Dakota . . . 128
118. Average Annual Attendance, St. Joseph's Mission School,South Dakota (N = 30) . . . 129
119. Average Annual Grades, St. Joseph's Mission School,South Dakota (N = 30) . . . 129
120. Progressive Dropout Rate, Tekakwitha Indian Children'sHome, South Dakota . . 0 . 131
121. Average Annual Attendance, Tekakwitha Indian Children'sHome, South Dakota (N = 8) . . . 132
122. Average Annual Grades, Tekakwitha Indian Children'sHome, South Dakota (N = 8) . . . 132
123. Progressive Dropout Rate, Todd County Elementary School,South Dakota . . 134
124. Average Annual Attendance, Todd County ElementarySchool, South Dakota (N = 46) . . . 135
125. Average Annual Grades, Todd County ElementarySchool, South Dakota (N = 46) . . . . 135
Table Page
126. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of SouthDakota Schools Enrolling Ten or More Indian Studentsin Grade Eight as of November, 1962 (N = 316) . . . . 136
127. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of Schools ina Six-State Area Enrolling Ten or More.IndianStudents in Grade Eight as of November, 1962(N = 840) . . . . . . . . . 137
LIST OF FIGURES
- Figure Page
1. Helen McCune Junior High School, Pendleton, Oregon,Movement of Indian Students Through Schools, Nov. 1962-June, 1967 . . . . . . . 11
2. Madras Junior High School, Madras, OregonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 14
3. Alexander Junior High School, Ferndale, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 18
4.- Copp le Junior High School, Omak, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 21
5. Inchelium Elementary School, Inchelimn, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . 24
6. Moc lips Junior High School, Moc lips, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .
7. Neah Bay Elementary School, Neah Bay, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . .
., . . 27
. . . 30
8. Nespelem Elementary School, Nespelem, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . 33
9. Wapato Junior High School, Wapato, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 36
1
10. Hawthorne Junior High School, Pocatello, IdahoMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 40
11, Lapwai Junior High School, Lapwai, IdahoMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 43
12. Browning Elementary School, Browning, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 47
I.
Figure Page
13. Busby Elementary School, Busby, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .
14. Cut Bank Junior High School, Cut Bank, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .
15. Hardin Junior High School, Hardin, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .
16. Havre Junior High School, Havre, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .
. 50
. 53
. 56
. 59
17. Hays Elementary School, Hays, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 62
18. Lodge Grass Elementary School, Lodge Grass, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 65
19. Poplar Junior High School, Poplar, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 68
20. Ronan Elementary School, Ronan, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 71
21. St. Ignatius Elementary School, St. Ignatius, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 74
22. St. Paul's Mission School, Hays, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 77
23. Ft. Totter. Elementary School, Ft. Totten, North DakotaMovement of Indian Sti ;dents Through Schools . . . 81
24. Ft. Yates Elementary School, Ft. Yates, North DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 84
25. Mandaree High School, Mandaree, North DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 87
26. New Town Elementary School, New Town, North DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools 90
27. St. Ann's Mission School, Belcourt, North DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 93
..
L
U
U
i1
ii
Li
Figure Page
28. He Dog School, Mission, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . . 97
29. Holy Rosary Mission School, Pine Ridge, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 100
30. Immaculate Conception Mission School, Stephan, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . 103
31. Little Eagle Day School, Little Eagle, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . . 106
32. McIntosh Elementary School, McIntosh, South Dakot2..Movement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 109
33. Pierre Boarding School, Pierre, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 112
34. Pine Ridge Public School, Pine Ridge, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 115
35. Porcupine Day School, Porcupine, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 118
36. Sisseton Elementary School, Sisseton, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 121
37. St. Francis Mission School, St. Francis, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . 124
38. St. Joseph's Mission School, Chamberlain, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 127
39. Tekakwitha Indian Children's Home, Sisseton, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 130
40. Todd County Elementary School, Mission, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 133
-
PART I
INTRODUCTION
Research Objectives
Repeated inquiries are made about the number of American Indian
students who progress or drop out of school from grade 8 through grade 12.
The response of the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory to the dearth
of information which triggered the inquiries was to launch this study to collect
recent. hard data on the education of Indian youth. The Laboratory expects to
use the findings of the study as part of the base which will be utilized in the
formulation of some of its activities. So a general purpose of this study is to
provide some data for organizations and agencies which may lead to indepth
studies, to development of experimental progrmns, and to more rational
decisions about the education for Indian students.
Specific objectives of the study were:
To provide a statistical report of progress and dropouts of Indian
students registered in grade 8 as of November, 1962 through June,
19 / by area, state, type of school, tribal group, and the majority-
minority position of Lndian students in the schools in the six-state
area Of Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and North and South
Dakota.
2
To develop and demonstrate a feasible system for data collection on a
continuing basis.
Related Literature
There is no intent in this study to draw inferences from or to interpret
the data reported. The following infornation from recent studies, far from
exhaustive, is presented in order to provide a framework for the data of the
study and a base for comparison. The reader is cautioned that the factors
which are characteristic of the dropout are extremely complex. In the absence
of most of these factors from this study, casual inferences regarding the cause
of dropouts are unwarranted. The statistical data of this study is useful only
in assessing the magnitude of the problem of the Indian high school dropout in
the northwest United States.
Studies do not agree on the number of dropouts in the American school
population. The reasons for the disagreement are to be found partially in the
v,arying definitions of "dropout" and partially in the varying methodologies
utilized for ascertaining the number of dropouts. One summary of the
literature1 reports public high school graduates in 1965-66 as a percent of
ninth graders in the fall of 1962. For the total United States this percent is
listed as 77.3 percent. For the states in which this study is thterested, the
figures are:
Oregon: 83.5% Montana: 83.6%Washington: 85.7 % North Dakota: 84.0%Idaho: 79.9% South Dakota: 85.6%
3
Or, put in another way, the dropout rate from the ninth to twelfth grades from
1962 to 1966 was 22.17 percent for the United States as compared with a drop-
out rate of 16.3 percent for the six-state region. Apker, 2 in his survey,
estimates that less than 40 percent of Indian high school entrants graduate as
compared to 60 percent of all American students. Spilka and Bryde3 state
that on a national level in the 1963 school year dropouts averaged 23 percent
of the school population as compared with a dropout rate for Indian students of
about 60 percent.
The State Department of Instruction in a study of the South Dakota
secondary school (grades 9-12) dropout population in 1963-64 showed that 59
percent of Indian dropouts occur in the ninth grade compared with 20 percent
for non-Indians.
An as yet unpublished study4 compared eighth grade students on the
Pine Ridge Reservation who subsequently dropped from school with those who
remained. It was found that 57 percent of dropouts are boys compared with
48 percent in the school population; 67 percent of dropouts are from country
districts as compared to 50 percent from country districts in the total school
population; dropouts tended to be older at entrance to ninth grade (64 percent
were 16 years of age or over) compared to those who remained (81 percent
were 15 years of age or under); dropouts achieved a mean score on the 28th
percentile in the Iowa test of educational achievement as compared to a mean
score on the 42nd percentile for those remaining.
4
Karrigan 5 concluded in a study on the Tula lip Reservation in
Washington State that Indians had a consistent school performance record; low
but consiste it with the status of their mental age, readiness and attendance.
The conclusions were based on the follnwing fnotnrs.
Ac..... One-half of Indian students were over the average age in their
classes compared to one-seventh of the non-Indians.
Achievement: Indian achievement was closest to the non-Indian in
grade 4 with the gap widening thereafter and the greatest disparity in
achievement reached in high school.
Retention in grades: Much greater with Indians.
Attendance: The mean in a school year of 130 days ranged, for
Indians, from 141-156 days and for non-Indians from 168-173 days.
Johnson, 6 in a comparative study of educational attainment of Warm
Springs Indians and non-Indians, concluded that with the exception of a few spe-
cific instances the analysis of educational attainment factors for the period
1955-1965 inclusive indicated that the Indians showed no gain compared with
non-Indians. More specifically, comparing Indians with non-Indians:
Gain was shown for the factor of age retardation or overage in grade;
No gain was shown for the factor of the dropoui, rate;
No gain was shown for the factor of intelligence quotient. score;
Regression was shown when the factor of graduation rate was
considered; and
Regression was shown when the factor of grade point average was
considered.
Research Procedures
5
The following criteria were used to determine the schools from which
a stratified random sample was drawn.
1. State and Area: Schools and tribal groups had to be in those
portions of the states of Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana,
North and South Dakota which were included in the Aberdeen,
Billings; and Portland area jurisdiction for the Bureau of Indian
Affairs.
2. Tribal Units: Tribal units were determined by state as derived
from the 1962-63 census of tribes. Tribal units of less than 200 .
population were deleted. An Indian was defined as an individual
who possessed a blood quantum of one-fourth or more.
3. Schools: Schools with concentrations of Indian students from
tribal groups were identified through State Departments of Educa-
tion, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and public and private school,
authorities. Schools with less than 10 Indian students enrolled in
grade 8 in 1962-63 were to be deleted. Because schools over-
estimated totals of Indian students, usually because they identified
pupils with less than one-fourth degree of Indian blood as Indians,
6
six schools are included in the sample with less than ten Indian
students registered in grade 8 as of November 1, 1962.
Schools were identified as having Indian students as a majority
(60 percent or more Indian), as a balance (40-59 percent Indian),
and as a minority (39 percent or less Lndian).
Schools were classified as public, private, federal, day, and
residential.
Sample
The stratified random sample was to comprise 50 percent of the
schools in each state drawn from the schools which qualified under the specific
criteria for the study. Actually 40 schools or 56.3 percent were drawn as the
sample of a total of 71 schools which qualified under the criteria for selection.
The target population, all Indian students in the 1962-63 grade 8
classes of the selected schools, were identified by name. Thereafter the pro-
gress of each student was traced through school to June, 1967 or dropout,
regardless of which school site was attended. The work of tracing the progress
of the students was carried out by field workers, usually employees of the
schools where the initial identification of the students was made. The data
was then checked by the project staff of the Portland office. School students
were guaranteed anonymity through the use of numerical coding as soon as the
basic data had been collected.
T
7
Statistical Data On Students
The term "dropout" is used in this study to designate a pupil who has
been in membership during the regular school term and who withdrew from
membership before graduating from secondary school or before completing an
equivalent program of studies. Such an individual is considered a dropout
whether the dropout occurs during or between regular school terms, whether
the dropout occurs before or after the compulsory school attendance age has
been reached, and if the minimum required amount of school work necessary
for graduation has not been completed except by reason of death.
Basic statistical data has been carried on each student as follows:
1. Area office
2. State
3. Tribal group
4. School for each grade attended
5. Percentage of school population who are Indian at grade 8 and 10
6. Type of school
7. Attendance
8. Grades at the close of each school year
9. Promotion/graduation
8
REFERENCES
1. Sherrell E. Varner, School Dropouts, Research Summary, Washington,D. C. , Research Division, National Education Association,1967, p. 8.
2. Wesley Apker, "A Survey of the Literature Related to Indian Pupil Drop-Out, " Unpublished M. Ed. Thesis, Washington State University,1962.
3. B. Spilka and J. Bryde, "Ahem-ton and Achievement Among Oglala SiouxSecondary Students, " Unpublished, 1965.
4. Donn Knudson cited by Eileen Maynard (ed. ), Pine Ridge ResearchBulletin, Bulletin No. 1, January, 1968, p. 27.
5. Cited by Wesley Apker, "A Survey of the Literature Related to IndianPupil Drop-Out, " Unpublished M. Ed. Thesis, Washington StateUniversity, 1962.
6. Robert S. Johnson, "Comparative Study of Educational Attainment of WarmSprings' Indians and Non-Indians for the Years 1956-1965 Inclu-sive," Unpublished Ed. D. Dissertation, Washington State Univer-sity, 1967.
PART II
FINDINGS
A major objective of this study was to document the magnitude of
the problem of the American Lndian high school dropout. In the following
pages the data, by schools and states, is presented in a series of figures and
tables. No attempt was made to interpret the findings. For example, the
reader will observe that the dropout rate for Indian female students in each of
the six states, with the exception of North Dakota, is considerably higher than
it is for the Indian male students. For the general population the reverse is
true. Speculation as to why Indian females drop out of school at a higher rate
than males, whether it be for pregnancy or early marriage or greater
irrelevancy of education for the female or because lesser value is placed on
the formal education of females by the Indian population or for some other
reason, is left to the reader pending further research into the matter.
Comparison of dropout rates between schools or tribes was
purposefully omitted from the study. Such comparisons are invidious because
of the varying numbers of pupils in the schools and particularly because of
the wide differences in the educational objectives pursued by the schools as a
result of the composition of their student bodies.
10
There are apparent differences, particularly in the tables of figures
on average annual grades and average annual attendance, between the total
number listed for the target population and the total number of pupils for
whom averages were computed. Where such discrepancies are noted, the
reason lies in that many schools did not keep records and thus the information
was unobtainable. These schools, espe2ial1y boarding schools, took for
granted that all their students were in one hundred percent attendance. Some
schools did not record a grade score when granting a social, rather than
earned, promotion to a student.
-
'
r1
rii
1:=
.-a-
Z
:YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
2 (1
963-
64)
Hel
en M
cCun
e ju
nior
Hig
h Sc
hool
>H
elen
McC
une
Jr. H
igh
Pend
leto
n, O
re.
(4)
(4)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 4
4
*DD
ropo
utP
- Pe
rsis
ter
G -
Gra
duat
e
0
4 4,
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
McE
wen
H S
Ath
ena,
Ore
.M
cEw
en H
S(1
)(1
)
NPe
ndle
ton
H S
Pend
leto
n, O
re,
(3)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
\\41
Pend
leto
n H
S..
> P
endl
eton
H S
(3)
-2
Que
ene
Ann
H S
Seat
tle, W
ash. 1
2 1
44
(3)
3
FIG
. 1(H
elen
McC
une)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
atiM
11.
I,.0
1
12
TABLE 1. PROGRESSIVE D.ROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HELEN McCUNE JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, OREGON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Totai N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Female 3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 1 33.3
Total 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 1 25.0
-
I
3
12
0
3
it
,e 11
II 1
Il
13
TABLE 2. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOWIS tiNDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 4 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDATS ENROLLED
IN HELEN McCITNE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. OREGON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N C7ic N % N % N %
Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0. o 1 33.0 0 0.0
Persister 4 92.3 4 93.3 4 79.5 3 88.3 3 87.3
TABLE 3. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE , 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 4 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS.
ENROLLED IN HELEN McCUNE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, OREGONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D 0 N. A.
Persister 4 B- 4 B- 3 B- 3 Bi- 3 C.:-
-3
r'O
rt'
.'
,41.
ft,
a,.
.'
v. .`"
"r
1v4
1"v.
,
1
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Mad
ras
Jr. H
igh
Mad
ras,
Ore
.(3
8)
nerz
as
2 (1
963-
64)
Riv
ersi
de I
nd. S
ch.
Ana
dark
o, O
kla.
(1)
Rob
t. Fa
rrel
lH
S (
Cor
rect
. )->
Rob
t. Fa
rrel
lSa
lem
, Ore
.(1
)(1
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 3
8
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
- 1
Dec
ease
d
Mad
ras
H S
(36)
,ilO
ON
VM
1.11
38
N
3 (1
964-
65)
Wyn
ne W
atts
H S
ortla
nd, O
re.
(1)
Riv
ersi
de I
nd.
(1)
Rob
e. F
arre
ll(3
)
Ben
d H
SB
end,
Ore
.(1
)
4 (1
965-
66)
Riv
ersi
de I
nd.
(2)
Rob
t. Fa
rrel
l(3
)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
GT
U. o
f O
rego
n' (C
orr.
)-
1
> R
iver
side
Ind
.-
-2
Rob
t. Fa
rrel
l1
-1
orth
Sal
em H
SN
orth
Sal
em H
SSa
lem
,(1
)(1
)
Mad
ras
H S
(27)
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Clu
locc
o, O
kla.
(1)
\a1W
apat
oHS
Wap
ato,
Was
h.
McL
aren
Sch
.fo
r B
oys
\W
oodb
urn,
Ore
.(1
)
McL
aren
Sch
.(1
)
Mad
ras
H(2
4)
Sand
y H
SSa
ndy,
Ore
.(1
)
Cal
ifor
nia
(1)
(2)
-->
Wap
ato
I S
(1)
Ft. S
ill I
nd. S
eh.
Law
ton,
Okl
a,(1
)
37
>Pt
. Sill
Ind
.(1
)
effe
rson
H S
Port
land
, Ore
.(1
)
36
FIG
. 2(M
adra
s) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
Mad
ras
H S
32
1
Sand
y H
S
eht)
nrrn
TM
__4C
hi1o
cco
Ind.
(1)
11
%pa
to H
S
Ft S
t1)
1 Jeff
erso
n if
S1
1 2 1 2 1 1
(5)
(3)
(23)
20
t 15
TABLE 4. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE; I 967, FROM A TARGETPOP ULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN MADRAS JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, OREGON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grath:8
--
7
ii
Li
TOTAL
Sex TOW N N % N % N % li 0m N % N re
Male 18 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 5. 6 2 11. 8 3 16. 7
Female 20 0 0. 0 1 6. 0 1 5. 3 3* 16. 7 3 21. 4 8 42. 1
Total 38 0 0.0 1 2.6 1 2.7 4 11.1 5 16.1 11 29.7
* - 1 Deceased
,x
,.
i
16
TABLE 5. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 38 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN MADRAS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, OREGON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N cyio N % N ,,/0 N %
Dropout 0 0.0 7 90.0 1 77.0 4 73.8 3 78.3
Persister 37 90.8 33 92. V 33 92.6 32 90.9 25 88.8
TABLE 6. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 38 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN MADRAS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, OREGONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D+ 2 D+ 2 C-i
Persister 35 C- 36 C- 35 D+ 31 C- 25 C-
-
w
-I 17
nTABLE 7 . PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF OREGON SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN STUDENTS
IN GRADE EIGHT AS CF NOVEMBER, 1962I
IiYear 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8 TOTAL
,
: U
Sex Total N Ivr 7d.0 N % N % N % N % N %
Male 19 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 5.3 2 11.1 3 15.8
Female 23 0 0.0 1 4.4 1 4.6 4* 19.1 3 18.8 9 40.9
Total 42 0 0.0 1 2.4 1 2,4 5 12.5 5 14.7 12 29.3
n*- 1 Deceased
-
,
1
1 1
I
j
1
,m
k
;4;
00i
i'";
;1-
,^"
'
'
koI,
44t,
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
2 (1
963-
64)
Gra
de 8
Ale
xand
er J
unio
rH
igh
Scho
olFe
rnda
le, W
ash.
(14)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
4
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
N.1
,A
1,Y
,
Ale
xand
er J
r. H
igh
(13)
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
00
5 (1
966-
67)
PG
Salt
Lak
e C
ity,
____
_) S
alt L
ake
City
,,
SP.I
t Lak
e C
ity,
Uta
hU
tah
Uta
h(1
)
Fern
dale
H S
> F
ernd
ale
H S
Fern
dale
H S
Fern
dale
, Was
h.(7
)1
23
5
1310
8(1
)(2
)(4
)6
FIG
. 3(A
lexa
nder
) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
r
19
TABLE 8. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967 , FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS ENROLLED IN ALEXANDER JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N %
Male 8 0 0.0 2 25.0
Female 6 1 16.7 1 20.0
Total 14 1 7.1 3 23.1
0 0.0 1 16.7
2 50.0 0 0.0
2 20.0 1 12.5
N % N %
1 20.0 4 50.0
0 0.9 4 66.7
1 14.3 8 57.1
20
TABLE 9. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 14 AMERICAN INDLAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN ALEXANDER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 2962-63 196S-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N of/o N % N % N %
Dropout 1 82. 0 3 70. 0 2 69. 5 1 7. 0 1 94. 0
,.
44
Persister 13 9L 2 10 92. 2 8 93. 4 7 95. 6 6 92. 5_
TABLE 10 . AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 14 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN ALEXANDER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Or.
Dropout 0 N. A. 2 D 2 D 1 D+ 1 D+
Persister 12 D+ 10 D+ 8 D+ 7 C- 5 C-
Ot,
<-
'ton
r---
1I
I=
t= t=
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
2 (1
963-
64)
Gia
de 8
Cop
ple
Juni
or H
igh
Om
ak, W
ash.
(9)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 9
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
ffi
r--- 3
(196
4-65
)
Oka
noga
n H
S>
Oka
noga
n H
SO
kano
gan,
Was
h.(1
)(1
)
4 C
oppl
e Ju
nior
Hig
h(6
)
,A
,SV
P
St. M
ary'
s M
issi
onO
mak
, Was
h.(1
)
r
1'1
7.7
SI `
.t i
:`.
"4*
-,
..
.
Om
ak S
r. H
igh
Om
ak, W
ash.
(5)
NM
ary
Wal
ker
H S
Spri
ngda
le, W
ash.
(1)
Oly
mpi
a H
SA
ubur
n, W
ash.
>O
lym
pia
H S
(1)
(1)
-
;
,,
,
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
P0
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
(1)
Om
ak S
r. H
igh
(4)
Oro
ville
H S
Oro
ville
, Was
h.(1
)
Cou
lee
Dam
H S
Cou
lee
Dam
, Was
h.
Om
ak S
r. H
igh
13
> M
ary
Wal
kf:r
H S
>M
ary
Wal
ker
H S
(1)
1 4
-1
1
88
7(1
)(5
)6
FIG
. 4(C
oppl
e) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
AdA
.Ja
L\D
22
TABLE 11 PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN COPPLE JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N 07/0 N % N % N %
Male 3 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 2 66.7
Female 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 16.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 16.7
Total 9 1 11.1 0 0.0 1 12.5 1 14. 3 0 0. 0 3 33.3
PTABLE 12. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DRUPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 9 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
nIN COPPLE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
23
i]Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
1-1
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 1 76.0 o o. o 1 85.0 1 13.0 o C. o
LI1-1
Persister 8 96.0 8 92.6 7 89.7 6 89.2 5 88.0
Li
1 1.1
TABLE 13. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRAD:NGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 9 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN COPPLE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTONDIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
gYear 1962-63
Grade 81963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
DN Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 1 D o N. A. o N. A. o N. A. o N. A.
Persister 7 C- 8 C- 7 al- 6 D+ 5 C-
-.,
YE
AR
1 (
1952
-63)
Gra
de 6
Inch
eiiu
m E
lem
enta
rySc
hool
Inch
eliu
m, W
ash.
(7)
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
> I
nche
lium
H S
> I
nche
lium
H S
(7)
(7)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
----
> I
nche
lium
H S
-->
Inc
heliu
m I
I S
(7)
77
Stud
ent T
otal
N 7
77
7-
(7)
7
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
FIG
. 5(I
nche
lium
) M
cvem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
,
25
TABLE 14 . PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, 1110M A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN INCHELIUM ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N N el,G N a
Male 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Female 3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Total 7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
26
TABLE 15. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 7 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLEL
IN INCHE LITIM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 19.32-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Per sister 7 90.6 7 89.9 7 94.1 7 87.4 7 92.0
TABLE 16. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 7 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN INCHELIUM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
Av Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A.
Persister 7 C+ 7 B- 7 C+ 7 C+ 7 C+
14
I I
41.1
.201
.1
r,,
v.,.
440
%O
rr 4
,"*A
r0,
111c
ft.
r'
rrri
r
11
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Mo
clip
s J
unio
Hig
h Sc
hool
-M
oclI
ps, W
ash.
(7)
2 (1
963-
64)
r=1
1=1
ti=f
11-
7
3 (1
964-
65)
Hel
m H
S->
Hel
m H
S7I
Hoq
uian
i, W
ash.
(1)
(1)
>M
oclip
s H
S(6
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 7
7
*DD
ropo
utP
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
--->
Moc
lips
H S
(6)
4 (1
965-
66)
Whi
te P
ass
H S
Ran
die,
Was
h;(1
)
> M
oclip
s H
S(5
)
=T
iro
6 (1
968-
67)
*1)
PG
Chi
loco
o In
d. S
ch.-
->C
hilo
cco
Ind.
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
-I
(1)
> M
oclip
s H
S-
4
Iv 4
6-
(5)
6
FIG
. 6(M
ocilp
s) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
IND
28
TABLE 17 . PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN MOC LIPS JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N ato
Male 2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Female 5 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 20.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 2 40.0
Total 7 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 3. 16.7 0 0.0 2 28.6
-,
iIi
29
TABLE 18. AVERAGt ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 7 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN MOC LIPS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 87.0 1 51.0 0 0.0
Persister 7 91.6 7 94.9 6 95.0 5 90.6 5 94.6
TABLE 19. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 7 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN MOCLIPS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D- 1 C 0 N. A.
Persister 7 C- 7 D+ 5 D+ 5 D+ 5 C
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Nea
h B
ay E
lem
enta
rySc
hool
Nea
h B
ay H
S>
Nea
h B
ay H
S>
Nea
h B
ay H
SN
eah
Bay
, Was
h.(9
)(9
)(6
)(1
0)
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
Lap
wai
H S
Lap
wai
, Ida
ho(1
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
0
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
Riv
ersi
de H
SC
alif
orni
a(1
)
CA
, 05
(196
6-67
)*D
PG
T
) N
eah
Bay
H S
21
34
Que
ene
Ann
H S
Seat
tle, W
ash.
(1)
109
7(2
)(1
)(3
)4
FIG
. 7(N
eah
Bay
) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
m
0
il
7
1
,
Sex
Male
Female
Total
31
TABLE 20. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN NEAH BAY ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1962-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
5 0 0.0 1 20.0 2 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 60.0
5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 20.0 2 50.0 3 60.0
10 0 0.0 1 10.0 2 22.2 1 14.3 2 33.3 6 60.0
-
i
32
TABLE 21. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN NEAH BAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 43.-5 0 0.0 2 95.0
Persister 10 88.7 9 89.2 7 92.1 6 81.5 4 81.3
TABLE 22. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE , 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN NEAH BAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D 1 D 2 C-
Persister 9 C- 8 C- 7 C- 6 C 4 C
YE
AR
1 (
1962
- 6
3)G
rade
8
Nes
pele
m E
lem
enta
rySc
hool
Nes
pele
m, W
ash.
(23)
II
r---
1-=
1.71
2 (1
963-
64)
.3
(196
4-65
)
Oth
ello
H S
/Oth
ello
, Was
h.(1
)
Cou
lee
Dam
H S
Cou
lee
Dam
, Was
h.(2
1)
4Con
cho
Dem
o. S
ch.
Con
oho,
Old
a.(1
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 2
323
D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
Whi
te S
wan
H S
Whi
te S
wan
H S
Whi
te S
wan
, Was
h.(1
)(1
)
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
(1)
Cou
lee
Dam
H S
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
Cou
lee
Dam
II
SC
oule
e D
am H
S
r--
(17)
(15)
-14
14
Uta
h St
. Ind
st. S
ch.
Ogd
en, U
tah
(1)
Uta
h St
. Ind
st. S
ch.
(1)
'Eng
lew
ood,
Col
.1
-1
1916
(1)
(14)
15
FIG
. 8(N
espe
lem
) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
N
c
-
i
34
TABLE 23. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1961, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN NESPELEM ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 15 0 0.0 2 13.3 1 7.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 20.0
Female 8 0 0.0 2 25.0 2 33.3 1 25.0 0 0.0 5 62.5
Total 23 0 0.0 4 17.4 3 15.8 1 6.3 0 0.0 8 34.8
- - -
5
8
35
TABLE 24. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 23 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN NESPELEM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-57
Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
0. 0
23 92.2
2 58.0
17 93.4
3 71.7
15 92.7
1 94.0
15 87.8
0 0.0
15 90.3
TABLE 25. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM
A TARGET POPULATION OF 23 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN NESPELEM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTON
IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A.
Persister 23 C
1963-64 1964-65
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
I C 3 D
18 C- 16 C-
1965-66 1966-67
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
1 D 0 N. A.
15 C+ 15 C+
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
2 (1
963-
64)
Wap
ato
;!'u
nior
Hig
h Sc
hool
Wap
ato
H S
Wap
ato,
Was
h.(2
0)(2
1)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 2
1
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
Eis
enho
wer
H S
',Yak
ima,
Was
h.(1
)
%C
oule
eD
arn
H S
Cou
lee
Dam
, Was
h.(1
)
21
Wap
ato
H(1
9)
Cou
lee
Dar
n H
S
t.o
5 (1
966-
67)
PG
-->
Eis
enho
wer
SE
isen
how
er H
S(1
)
Riv
ersi
de I
nd. S
ch.-
->
fllv
orsi
dc I
nd.
Ana
dark
o, O
kla.
-1
(1)
Wap
ato
H S
(12)
>W
apat
o If
S2
7
) St
even
son
II S
Stev
enso
n, W
ash.
1
8 1
Top
peni
sh H
ST
oppe
nish
H S
Top
peni
sh, W
ash.
--
11
(1)
Cou
lee
Dar
n H
SC
oule
e D
am H
S(1
)(1
)-
11
2115
FIG
. 9(W
apat
o) M
over
nevt
of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
(1)
(12)
13
3 7
TABLE 26. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1961 , FROM A TARGET
POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS ENROLLED IN WAPATO JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N N % N % N % N %
Male 9 0 0.0 0 0. a 2 22.2 2 28.5 0 0.0 4 44.4
Female 12 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 33. 0 0.0 G 0. 0 4 33. 3
Total 21 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 28.6 2 13.3 0 0.0 8 38.1
38
TABLE 27. AVERAGE ANNUAL TTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGE 1' POPULATION OF 21 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENT:3 ENROLLED
IN WAPATO JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1954-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N CVAl N % N %
Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 45.8 2 54.5 0 0.0
Persister 21 85.7 20 90.4 15 92.1 13 90.5 13 91.8
TABLE 28. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 21 AMEILICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN WAPATO JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASMNGTON .
IN 'GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Av. Gr. N Av. Or. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 4 D+ 1 D 0 N. A.
Persister 21 C- 20 C- 14 C- 13 C- 13 C-
11
39
TABLE 29. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF WASHINGTON SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN
STUDENTS DI GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 46 1 2.2 5 11.1 5 12.5 4 11.4 1 3.2 16 34.8
Female 45 1 2.2 3 6.8 10 24.4 3 9.7 2 7.1 19 42.2
Total 91 2 2.2 8 9.0 15 18.5 7 10.6 3 5.1 35 38.5
of
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Haw
thor
ne J
unio
rH
igh
Scho
olPo
cate
llo, I
daho
(101
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Ala
med
a Jr
. Hig
h> A
lam
eda
Jr. H
igh
Poca
tello
, Ida
ho(1
)(1
)
--->
Haw
thor
ne J
r. H
igh
(8)
Bro
okly
n Ju
nior
Hig
hSa
lmon
, Ida
ho(I
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
010
I 1
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
CI
T
Chi
loce
o In
d. S
ch.
......
......
......
..,../
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
(1)
Hig
hlan
d H
SPo
cate
llo, I
daho
----
> H
ighl
and
H S
(9)
(8)
./ Bla
ckfo
ot H
SB
lack
foot
, Ida
ho(1
)
--)
Chi
loce
n In
d.-
----
--->
Hig
hhm
d H
S3
14
5
99
(3)
(1)
(51
6
FIG
. 10
(Haw
thor
ne)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2-
June
196
7
41
TABLE 30. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HAWTHORNE JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63G.,..ade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N CI/0 N %
Male 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 16.7 1 16.7
Female 4 0 0.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 66.7 3 75.0
Total 3 0 0 0.0 1 10.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 33.3 4 40.0
42
TABLE 31. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN HAWTHORNE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 196465 1965-66 1366-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 0 0.0 1 82.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 67.0
Persis ter 10 90.1 9 87.9 9 89.7 9 91.6 6 89.2
TABLE 32. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTEI1S,
ENROLLED IN HAWTHORNE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHOIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1'362
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A.
Persister 10 C- 9 C- 9 C- 9 C- 5 C+
Y E
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Lap
wai
Jun
ior
Hig
h Sc
hool
+>
Lap
wai
H S
Lap
wai
II
S*
Lap
wat
, Ida
ho(2
0)(1
4)(2
3)
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Ft. S
ill I
nd. S
ch.
t Law
ton,
Okl
a.(1
)
Salt
Lak
e C
ity,
I U
tah
(1)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 2
3
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
+ -
1 D
ecea
sed
Lap
wai
Jr.
Hig
h(1
)
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
(1)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
GT
Riv
ersi
de I
nd. S
oh.
Ana
dark
o, O
kla.
(1)
> S
alt L
ake
City
,U
tah
(1)
Uni
v. o
f Id
aho
(1)
-.C
hilo
cco
Ind.
Sch
.
-->
Riv
ersi
de I
nd.
--...
,...4
Lap
wai
H S
,.Lap
wai
H S
(13)
111
12
22
St. A
ntho
ny T
r. C
tr.
St. A
ntho
ny, I
daho
-1
1
-->
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
(2)
(1)
1-
2218
-
17(1
)(1
)(1
4)15
FIG
. 11
(Lap
wai
) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
CA
D
44
TABLE 33. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN LAPWAI JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade S TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N cvm N %
Male 10 0* 0. 0 2 22. 2 1 14. 3 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 3 33. 3
Female 13 0 0. 0 2 15. 4 0 0. 0 1 9. 1 1 10. 0 4 30. 8
Total 23 0 0. 0 4 18. 2 1 5. 6 1 5. 9 1 6. 3 7 31. 8
0* - 1 Deceased
45
TABLE 34. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 23 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN LAPWAI JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMI1ER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
N % N % N % N % N %
0 0.0 4 86.3 1 100.0 1 91. 0 0 0.0
23 91.8 18 92.8 17 94.0 15 93.7 15 f1. 7
TABLE 35. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 23 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN LAPWAI JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO
IN GRADE EIGHT , NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Ay. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 4 D+ 1 D+ 1 C 0 N. A.
Persister 22 C- 18 C- 16 C+ 15 C 15 C+
46
TABLE 36. PROGRESSIVE DROPOU T RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1SC7, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF IDAHO SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN STUDENTS
IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N -7io N % N % .py1, % N %
Male 16 0* 0.0 2 13.3 1 7.7 0 0.0 1 8.3 4 26.7
Female 17 0 0 0 3 17.7 0 0.0 1 ?. 1 3 23.1 7 41.2
Total 33 0 0.0 5 15.6 1 3.7 1 3.9 4 16.0 11 34.4
* 1 Deceased
1
}
1
]
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Bro
wni
ng E
lem
.B
row
ning
, Mon
t.(7
9)
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Bus
by E
lem
.B
usby
, Mon
t,--4
. Bus
by H
S(1
)(1
)
Poca
tello
H S
Poca
tello
, Ida
ho(1
)
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Chi
loce
o, O
kla.
(5)
77<
----
----
----
--._
____
____
___s
Bro
wni
ng H
SB
row
ning
, Mon
t,B
row
ning
H S
>B
row
ning
H S
Bro
wni
ng !
.1 S
(36)
46
2430
Popl
ar H
S
(43)
(45)
Pcpl
ar, M
ont.
> P
opla
r II
S(1
)-
-1
1
Poca
tello
H S
(1)
Chf
locc
o In
d, S
ch.
(5)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*I)
13G
T
Poca
tello
H S
(1)
Chi
locc
oSc
h.(3
)
Poca
tello
11
S
Cut
Ban
k *H
SC
ut B
ank,
Mon
t.....
.(1
)
>C
htIo
ceo
bid.
Sch
.1
1
1 2
>B
row
ning
Ele
m.
(4)
----
----
----
----
----
---.
.....
Stud
ent T
otal
N 7
9
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
< -
Sch
ool N
on-A
ttend
ance
,Fi
andr
eau
Ind.
Sch
.jF
land
reau
, S. D
ak.
Bro
wni
ng E
lem
.(3
)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
dron
u hi
d. S
ch.
> F
ludr
eau
Md.
Snh
,(6
)(8
)(8
)1
26
Nox
on H
SN
oxon
, Mon
t.H
SII
SU
S
(1)
--->
Nox
on(1
)--
).N
oxon
(1)
>11
0xon
1
6163
51(6
)on
(3:1
)
FIG
. 12
(Bro
wni
ng)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
.-
'lune
196
'7
7 1
48
TABLE 37. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN ST1.:98WIS ENROLLED IN BROWNING ELEMENTARY
SCHOOI., MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVElasER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-t34 i964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL t
Sex Total N N % N % N % N N %
Male 40 5 12. 5 3 9. 1 A 12. 5 3 10. 7 3 12. 0 18 45. 0
Female 39 6 15. 4 2 7. 1 8 25. 8 3. 4. 4 2 9. I 19 48. 7
Total 79 11 13. 9 5 8. 2 12 29. 1 11 7. 8 5 10. 6 37 46. 8
_
49
TABLE 38. AVER.AGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUT!? AND
PERSISTEPS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 79 AMERICAN RiDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN BROWNING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEVBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
N % N % N oio N av N a.0
11 55. 1 3 58. 0 n 49. 5 A 16. 5 5 66. 8
65 84. 5 54 87.1 50 89. 9 46 90. 2 39 90.3
TABLE 39. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM
A TARGET POPULATION OF 79 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN BROWNING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA
IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
7 D 2 C+ 2 D 2 C 2 D
58 C- 49 C+ 48 C 44 C 37 C+
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
du 8
2 (1
963-
64)
Bus
by E
lem
enta
ry S
ch.
Bus
by, M
ont.
Bus
by I
I S
(20)
(19)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 2
019
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
< -
Sch
ool N
on-A
ttend
ance
Cal
ifor
nia
-/(1
)
3 (1
964-
65)
Bro
wni
ng H
SB
row
ning
, Mon
t.(1
)
--->
Bus
by H
S(1
2)
4 (1
966-
66)
01 0
5 (1
966-
67)
DP
0T
Mt.
Vie
w S
ch.
Riv
ersi
de I
nd.
Hel
ena,
Mon
t.(1
)A
nada
rko,
Okl
n.(1
)
Bus
Iv
\--
--)
II 1
5--
- B
usby
II
S(1
0)--
----
...,,,
-2
aA
*"...
......
z1 ) St
. Lnb
re I
I S
1
----
......
......
....
11
-I
i
St. L
abre
Mis
sion
ll S
Ash
land
, Mon
t.(1
)../
.---
--.
----
----
-1
\IC
alif
orni
a'(1
)
15
St. L
abre
H S
(2)
12
FIG
. 13
(Bus
by)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
,N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
(1)
(3)
(6)
9
-
51
TABLE 40. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGET
POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STE:DENIS ENROLLED IN BUSBY ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N aay
Male 9 0 0. 0 1 11. 1 2 25. 0 0 0. 0 0 f.' 0 3 33. 3
Female 11 1 9. 1 3 30. 0 1 34. 3 2 33. 3 1 25. 0 8 72. 7
Total 20 1 5. 0 4 21. 1 3 20. 0 2 16. 7 1 10. 0 11 55. 0
52 A
TABLE 41. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENIDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 20 AMERICAN INDIAN STUrgLNTS ENROLLED
IN BUSBY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
ye N % N % N % N %N c:
Dropout 0 0.0 3 75.3 2 63.5 1 41.0 1 88.0
Persister 11 82.0 14 81.3 9 91.6 9 87.3 4 78.5
TABLE 42. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 20 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN BUSBY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 1 A 1 D 2 D+ 2 C 1
Persis ter 14 B- 14 C- 10 C- 10 C- 9 C-
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Cut
Ban
k Ju
nior
Hig
h>
Cut
Ban
k H
SC
ut B
ank,
Mon
t.(C
)
(6)
, .i.r
m-e
mvr
tl
4 (1
966-
66)
5 (1
96t3
-67)
*D13
-> C
ut B
ank
H S
> C
ut B
ank
II S
> C
ut 1
3nnk
11
S
(6)
(6)
14
.1E
ast V
alky
11
SSp
okan
e, W
ash.
1SO
Stud
ent T
otal
N 6
66
6(1
)(1
)0)
6
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
FIG
. 14
(Cut
Ban
k) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
no19
67C
AD
54
TABLE 43. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDEN 'i S ENROLLED IN CUT BANK JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
iocr* cr/oSex Total N N % N cr N N N % N %
ginc-
Male 3 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0, C 0 0. 0 1 33.3 1 33.3
Female 3 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0
Total 6 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 16. 7 1 16.7
-.3
)
55
TABLE 44. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS AND
PERSIETERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 6 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN CUT BANK JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N afo
Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 53.0
Persister 6 91.2 6 95.2 6 94.0 6 92.2 5 89.8
TABLE 45. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM
A TARGET POPULATION OF 6 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN CUT BANK JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA
IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A.
Persister 6 C+ 6 C- 5 C- 5 C- 5 C-
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Har
din
juni
or H
igh
Scho
olH
ardt
h, M
ont.
(17)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
7
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.(1
)
Har
din
H S
Har
din,
Mon
t.(1
3)
St. L
abre
Mis
sion
H S
Ash
land
, Mon
t.(1
)
15
c:
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
Flan
drea
u In
d.Fl
andr
eau
Ind.
(1)
(1)
,Har
din
H S
(13)
> S
t. L
abre
H S
> F
land
reau
Ind
. 11
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
Chi
locc
o In
d.(2
)2
2
Har
dth
H S
(9)
Lod
ge G
rass
H S
Lod
ge G
rass
, Mon
t.(1
)
>St
. Lab
re H
S
Har
din
H S
16
) L
odge
Gra
ss li
S-
22
> S
t. ',f
ibre
H S
(1)
(1)
-1
1
1514
FIG
. 15
(Har
din)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
t.-
(3)
(10)
13
o4.
4, i"
'w
_
57
TABLE 46. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGET
POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HARDIN JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 196E-66 19'36-67
Grade 8TOTAL
.iex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 11 2 18.2 0 0.0 1 11.1 1 12.5 0 0.0 4 36.4
Female 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Total 17 2 11.8 0 0.0 1 6.7 1 7.1 0 0.0 4 23.5
58
TABLE 45. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 17 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN HARDIN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 2 80.0 0 0.0 1 79.0 1 90.0 0 0.0
. iPersister 15 92.9 15 86.1 14 92.2 13 93.2 13 90.8
TABLE 48. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM iA TARGET POPULATION OF 17 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN HARDIN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA
IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
0,Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr,
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 C 1 D- 0 N. A.
Persister 15 C- 15 C- 13 D+ 12 C+ 13 C+
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Hav
re J
unio
rH
igh
Scho
olH
avre
, Mon
t.(2
4)
2 (1
963-
64)
Box
Eld
er E
lem
.B
ox E
lder
H S
ox E
lder
, Mon
t.B
ox E
lder
, Mon
t,B
ox E
lder
H S
)Box
Eld
ee H
SB
ox E
lder
II
S
(1N
(5)
(7)
(a)
-3
47
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
(3T
....
......
......
Cal
ifor
nia
(1)
..---
---'"
---
Stat
e In
dst.
Sch.
Mile
s C
ity, M
ont.
Stat
e In
dst.
(1)
(1)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 2
4
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
< -
Sch
ool N
on-A
ttend
ance
\ Havre
Jr.
Hig
h(8
)
Stat
e In
dst.
Stat
e In
dst.
Stat
e In
dst.
(2)
(1)
(1)
Mou
ntai
n V
iew
Mou
ntai
n V
iew
....
(Cor
rect
iona
l)(1
).
Hel
ena,
Mon
t.(1
)
NsN
,Iff
avre
II S
....-
----
--H
avre
, Mon
t.---
----
----
---*
Hav
re H
S(6
)(5
)
Bus
by I
nd. S
ch.
Bus
by, M
ont.
(1)
21
>B
usby
Ind
. Sch
.(1
)
16
alif
orni
a(1
)
Hav
re H
S(4
)
Cas
per,
Wyo
.(1
)
13
FIG
. 16
(Hav
re)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
Stat
e In
dst.
-1
-
Hav
re n
s
1
33
(4)
(7)
11
TABLE 49. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN LNDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HAVRE JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, ;962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N N aic N % N v,c, N % N %
Male 11 1 9. 1 2 20. 0 1 12. 5 1 14. 3 0 0. 0 5 45. 5
Fcmale 13 2 15. 4 2 18. 2 3 33. 3 1 16. 7 0 0. 0 8 61. 5
Total 24 3 12. 5 4 19. 1 4 23. 5 2 15. 4 0 0. 0 13 54. 2.
61
TABLE 50. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS AND
PERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 24 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN HAVRE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
.c, %orfo
axN % N v N N N
Dropout 3 65.3 3 57.7 3 57.0 2 74.5 0 0.0
Persister 21 80.2 11 86.5 9 93.4 10 83.4 71 92.5
TABLE 51. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM
A TARGET POPULATION OF 24 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN HAVRE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA
IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 1 D D 2 C+ 0 N. A. 0 N. A.
Persister 10 C- 12 C- 9 C+ 8 C+ 11 C-
")r
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Hay
s E
lem
. Sch
.H
ays,
Mon
t.(1
8)
2 (1
963-
64)
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
3 (1
964-
65)
Ft. S
ill I
nd. S
ch.
Law
ton,
Okl
a.(1
)
4 (1
965-
6(i)
tD
6 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
"--
.....
.Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
(1)
Chi
locc
o hi
d. S
ch.
----
->C
hilo
cco
Ind.
Sch
.,-
---
(2)
(3)
-1
12
----
----
----
--C
onch
o D
emo.
Sch
...-
----
---
Con
cho,
Okl
a(1
)(1
)..-
----
----
----
.
St. P
aul's
Ind
.l<
Scho
olSt
. Pau
l's I
nd.
____
_,, S
t, Pa
ul's
Ind
,St
. Pau
l's I
nd.
Mar
ty, S
. Dak
.(1
(1)
14-
1-
1(1
)
1<
(1)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.Fl
andr
eau
Ind.
Sch
.Fl
andr
cau
Ind.
Sch
.(7
Che
yenn
e-A
rapa
hoIn
dian
Sch
ool
Con
cho,
Okl
a.(1
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
8
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
(9)
Chi
nook
H S
Chi
nook
, Mon
t.(1
)
13
Inst
. Am
. Ind
. Art
sSa
nte
Fe, N
ew M
ex.
(1)
>C
hino
ok I
I S
(1)
15
(8)
>In
st. A
m. I
nd. A
rts
(1)
>C
'Ain
ook
H S
(1)
13
< -
Sch
ool N
on-A
ttend
ance
FIG
. 17
(Hay
s) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls,
Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
Ilnl
oH
SH
arle
m, M
ont. 1
1
--->
Fla
ndre
au I
nd. S
ch.
24
4
Chi
nook
-1
1
(2)
(2)
(7)
9
, 63
TABLE 52. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ElcROLLED IN HAYS ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1S64-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
,Male 8 1 12. 5 0 0. 0 2 28.6 1 20. 0 1 25. 0 5 62. 5
Female 10 1 10. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 22. 2 1 14.3 4 40. 0
Total 18 2 11. 1 0 0. 0 2 12. 5 3 21. 4 2 18. 2 9 50. 0 4.. A
-
64
TABLE 53. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 18 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN HAYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 2 93.5 0 0.0 9 49.5 3 81.3 2 33.5
Persister 16 88.3 12 95.5 13 98.7 10 94.8 8 94.3
TABLE 54. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 18 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN HAYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
-Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
2 C- 0 N. A. 1
15 C- 10 C+ 13
D- 1 C 1 nL.
C 10 C+ 9 C-E
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Lod
ge G
rass
Ele
m.
Lod
ge G
rass
, Mon
t.(2
4)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 2
4
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
(196
3-64
)3
(196
4-65
)
St. L
abre
Mis
sion
H S
St. L
abre
H S
Ash
land
, Mon
t.(2
)
(1)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.(3
)
4(19
65-r
.6)
5 (1
966-
67)
PG
hnm
ac. C
onee
p.--
-''St
epha
n, 3
. Dak
.--
> I
mna
c. C
onee
p.
3. S
t. L
nbre
II
SL
ahre
II
S -
Flan
drea
u In
cL(4
)
>L
odge
Gra
ss H
SY
r.oc
lge
Gra
ss H
S(1
7)(1
4)
Flan
drea
u(2
)
> L
odge
Gra
ss I
I S
(9)
-->
Flan
drea
u1
1 2
> L
odge
Gra
ss n
s9
I 0
Inst
. of
Am
. Ind
. Art
sSa
nte
Fe, N
ew M
ex.
> I
nst.
Am
. ind
.H
ardi
n H
S(1
)1
1
Har
din,
Mon
t.(1
)M
ount
ain
Vie
w S
ell.
Hel
ena.
Mon
t.(1
)
Hol
y R
osar
y M
issi
onH
SH
oly
Ros
ary
H S
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
Chi
loec
o In
d.(1
)(2
)
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.(1
)
2322
>H
oly
Ros
ary
H S
----
> C
hilo
cco
Ind.
11
>H
oly
Rrm
ary
2
20(1
)ro
ig
FIG
. 18
(Lod
ge G
rass
) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
-Ju
ne 1
967
Cr)
66
TABLE 55. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDEN1S ENROLLED IN LODGE GRASS
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N N % N c7g N air N cr/c. N CI
A
Male 10 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0
Female 14 1 7. 1 1 7. 7 2 16. 7 1 10. 0 1 11. 1 6 42. 9
Total 24 1 4. 2 1 4. 4 2 9. 1 1 5. 0 1 5. 3 6 25. 0
67
TABLE 56. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS AND
PERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 24 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN LODGE GRASS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EiGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 1 88.0 1 96.0 2 62.0 2 74.5 1 8.0
Persister 92 81.4 22 80.6 20 91.2 18 94.2 17 95.9
TABLE 57. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM
A TARGET POPULATION OF 24 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN LODGE GRASS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 1 C 1 D+ 2 D 2 D+ 0 N. A.
Persister 14 D+ 17 C- 19 C- 17 C- 16
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
2 (1
963-
64)
Gra
de 8
Popl
ar J
r. H
SPo
plar
, Mon
t.(3
9)
3 (1
964-
65)
Prov
o, U
tah
Prov
o, U
tah
(1)
(1)
1<
Popl
ar H
S(3
4)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 3
935
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
< -
Sch
ool N
on-A
ttend
ance
Popl
ar H
S(3
2)
C)
CO
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
----
>Pr
ovo,
Uta
h(1
)
Flan
drea
u th
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dal
t.(1
)
Mou
ntai
n V
iew
HS
-1H
elen
a, M
ont.-
-*,M
ount
ain
Vie
w(1
)(1
)
Will
isto
n H
SW
illis
ton,
N. D
ak.
(1)
Uta
h St
. Ind
st. S
ch.
Ogd
en, U
tah
----
->U
tah
St. I
ndst
. Sch
.(1
)(1
)
35
Popl
ar H
S
PG
>Pr
ovo,
Uta
h1
Coo
k C
hr. T
rng.
Sch
.Ph
oeni
x, A
rizo
na1
--->
Popl
ar I
I S
1
(23)
3-
1515
Ari
zona (1
)
Ron
an H
SR
onan
, Mon
t.(2
)
G. E
. D.
Mar
ines
1
Wilb
ston
H S
>R
onan
11
S
1
1
29(3
1(2
)(1
8)20
FIG
. 19
(Pop
lar)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an T
a.cd
ents
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
Juno
196
7
elo.
t00'
r
2 ,
,I1
.7.,
niV
.V"C
P..7
"
.A
l
-1111111=Mil.Z./.1111.1.....
69
TABLE 58. PROGRESSI VE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGE° TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGET
POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN POPLAR JUWOR
HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 196263 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N
Male 22 1 4.6 0 0.0 3 14.3 2 11.1 2 12.5 8 36.4
Female 17 2 11.8 1 6.7 3 21.4 4 36.4 1 14.3 11 64.7
Total 3 3 7.7 1., 2.8 6 17.1 6 20.7 3 13.0 19 48.7
.,-,-
70
TABLE 59. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO jUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 39 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
iN POPLAR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 162
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N a0 N % N % N % N %
Dropout 3 79.7 1 98.0 5 74.6 6 80.8 3 79.3
Persister 36 95.9 34 93.4 30 89.1 24 92.0 20 92.0
TABLE 60. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 39 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN POPLAR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-6:: 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 1 D 0 N. A. 3 D 2 C-1- 1 D
Persister 35 C-1- 32 C- 27 C- 23 C- 19 C-
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
96E
-66)
5 (1
966-
67)
Gra
de 8
*DP
GT
Pier
re I
nd. S
ch.
/Pie
rre,
S. D
ak.
(1)
/St
ate
Inds
t. Sc
h.M
iles
City
, Mon
t.(1
)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.(1
)
Ron
an E
lem
enta
rySc
hool
---)
Ron
an H
S>
Ron
an H
SR
onan
, Mon
t.(8
)(8
)(1
1)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
1
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
Hel
lgat
e H
SM
isso
ula,
Mon
t.(1
)
----
-->
Fla
ndre
au I
nd. S
ch.
(1)
Stat
e ln
dst.
Sch.
1-
1
----
> R
onan
H S
Ron
an I
! S
(8)
88
>H
ellg
ate
H S
>H
ellg
ate
H S
> H
ellg
ate
II S
(1)
(1')
-1
1
1010
10(1
)(9
)10
FIG
. 20
(Ron
an)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
72
TABLE 61. PROGi,ESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 196, , FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN RONAN ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N ofiv N % N % N c9,0 N % N %
Male 7 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. A 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0
Female 4 1 25. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 25. 0
Total H 1 9.1 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 9. 1
7 3
TABLE 62. AVERAGE. A NNLJA L ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 11 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN RONAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE FIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 196.J-66 1966-67Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
10
1 90.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
10 90.5 10 93.6 10 93.5 9 92.6
0 0.0
10 93.7
TABLE 63. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM
;1
ia
4 _
. A TARGET POPULATION OF 11 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS ANT PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN RONAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA
IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
, Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
iiv. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 1 C 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A.
Persis ter 9 B- 10 C- 10 C- 9 C- 9 C-
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
St. I
gnat
ius
Ele
men
tzry
St. I
gnat
ius,
Mon
t.(9
)
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Flan
drca
u In
d. S
ch.
S. D
ak.
Flan
drea
u(2
)
St. I
gnat
ius
H S
-> S
t. Ig
natiu
s H
S(4
)(3
)
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
(1)
Bus
by I
nd. S
ch.
Bus
by I
nd. S
ch.
Bus
by, M
ont.
(1)
(1)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 9
7'7
*D -
Dro
pout
PPe
rsis
ter
GG
radu
ate
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
Flan
drea
u th
d.(3
)
St. I
gnat
ius
HSZ
_(2
)
Flan
drea
u th
d.1
11
23
St. I
gnat
ius
H S
1
-->
Chi
locc
o In
d.>
Chi
kcco
Ind
.(1
)1
Bus
by I
nd. S
ch.
> B
usby
Ind
. Sch
.(1
)
FIG
. 21
(St.
Igna
tius)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
,N
ov. 1
902
- Ju
ne 1
967
16.
.
1
-1
1
(2)
(1)
(4)
5
75
TABLE 64. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE. 1967, FROM A TARGETPOP LJI
ELEMTIONOF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ST. IGNATIUS
ENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
SexI,
Total N N N N crit N c.c N % N
Male 5 9 40.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 3
Female 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 n%, 0.0 0 0.0 1 25.0 1
Total 9 9 99.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 28.6 4
cic
60.0
25.0 144.4
It
7 6
TABLE 65. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 9 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENaOLLED
IN ST. IGNATIUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
N a4 N c.;,/ N % N Nic %
9 86.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0. 0 9 43.5
7 96.3 7 96.6 6 95.3 7 91.7 4 96.8
TABLE 66. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM
A TARGET POPULATION OF 9 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN ST. IGNATIUS ELFMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA
IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Dropout
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. G.
0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D-
Persister 7 C- 6 C- 6 C- 7 C+ 4 B-
"i
i
I
-
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
St. P
au P
s M
issi
onH
ays,
Mon
t.(1
2)
2 (1
963-
64)
Che
yenn
e-A
rapa
ho I
nd.
Con
cho,
Okl
a.(1
)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
d re
au, S
. Dak
.(5
)
.'*".
.....,
Jodd
Co.
II
SIv
Iiss
ion,
S. D
ak.
(3)
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
Dod
son
H S
Dod
son,
Mon
t.->
Dod
son
H S
(1)
(1)
>Fl
andr
eau
Ind.
(7)
St. P
aul's
Mis
sion
(2)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
211
*D -
Dro
pout
PPe
rsis
ter
G -
Gra
duat
e
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
--->
Fla
ndre
au I
nd,
Flan
clre
au I
nd.
(4)
Tod
d C
o. H
ST
odd
Co.
H
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
ch.
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
i(2)
Coi
leho
Dem
o. S
ch.
Con
eho,
Okl
a.(1
)
11
(4)
-->
Chi
locc
o In
d.(2
)
13
Har
lem
II
SH
arle
m, M
ont.
----
4To&
In
s 3
Chi
loce
o In
d.2
2
11(1
)(9
)9
FIG
. 22
(St.
Paul
's M
issi
on)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
..'Ir
4.-Y
r4' e
IN}4
^,Y
r .1
` i J
A. '
,I. r
,'r,i
rror
rr ',
Air
eIt
errr
r:rr
rl r
,4,
1r,
rvr
a ri
rr.,-
,vr
1.5r
f rr
,I.
,r,
..yst
...,..
II,
. .. .
..,
0 1
hI 0
, ,,,.
...,
11. W
... 0
h11
VW
' ,w
,.. ..
, ..1
4,5.
0.1.
10 A
+1.
44
78
TABLE 67. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ST. PAUL'S MISSION
SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N '7,0 N % N %
Male 6 1 16.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 20.0 2 33.3
Female 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 16.7 0 0.0 1 16.7
Total 12 1 8.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9.1 1 10.0 3 25.0
-
7 9
TABLE 68. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN ST. PAUL'S MISSION SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
N % N % N % N % N %
1 81.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 84.0
11 88.6 10 96.1 10 98 4 10 98.5 9 97.2
TABLE 69. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM
A TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN ST. PAUL'S MISSION SCHOOL, MONTANA
IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Dropout
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
1 D 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D+
Persister 11 B-L 9 C+ 7 C 9 C+ 8 C+
80
TABLE 70. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50.1 OF MONTANA SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN STUDENTS
IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962
year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N q.0 N % N % N ,7.0
Male 132 13 9.9 6 5.0 13 11.5 8 8.0 9 9.8 49 37.1
Female 127 14 11.0 9 8.0 17 16.4 12 13.8 7 9.3 5:1 46.5
Total 259 27 10.4 15 6.5 30 13.8 20 10.7 16 9.6 108 41.7
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Ft. T
otte
n E
lem
.Ft
. Tot
ten,
N. D
ak.
(10)
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.(1
)
Mad
dock
H S
Mad
dock
, N. D
ak.
(5)
Dev
il's
Lak
e E
lLi.
Dev
il's
Lak
e, N
. Dak
.(1
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
010
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
40be
ron
H S
\Obe
ron,
N. D
ak.
(1)
Ft. Y
ates
H S
Ft. Y
ates
, N. D
ak.
(1)
)Fla
ndre
au I
nd.
(1)
Imln
ac. C
once
p.St
epha
n, S
. Dak
.(1
)
H S
t"I
A(7
)\
Dev
il's
Lak
e H
SD
eviP
s L
ake,
N. D
ak.
(1)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
->Im
mac
. Con
cep.
)Im
mac
. Con
cep.
(1)
Mad
dock
H S
(5)
Obe
ron
HO
bero
n H
S(2
)(2
)
1 Mad
dock
H S
-4
4
Obe
ron
H S
1
98
(2)
-(4
)4
FIG
. 23
(Ft.
Tot
ten)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
uugh
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
Jnne
196
7
82
TABLE 71. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO %TUNE, 1567, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDEN'TS ENROLLED IN F7. TOTTEN ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEN!BER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-07TOTAL
Sex Total N N q,c N % N % N % N %
Male 3 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 50.0 2 66.7
Female 7 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 2 33.3 1 25.0 4 57.1
Total 10 0 0.0 1 10.0 1 11.1 2 25.0 2 33.3 6 60.0
83
TABLE 72. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, 01. DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN FT. TOTTEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
N % N % N G74- N % N %
Dropout 0 0.0 1 27.0 1 10.0 2 35.0 9 91.5
Persister 10 94.8 9 79. 9 8 87.8 6 93.2 4 93.8
TABLE 73. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN FT. TOTTEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 B
Persister 10 C+ 3 C- 6 C- 6 C- 1 C-
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Ft. Y
ates
Ele
men
tary
Ft. Y
ates
, N. D
ak.
(37)
2 (1
963-
64)
Plan
kint
on H
Sla
nkin
ton,
S. D
ak.
(1)
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
St. P
aul's
Ind
, Sch
.St
. Pau
l's I
nd.
/Mar
ty,
S. D
ak.
(1)
(I)
McI
ntos
h H
S
77M
cInt
osh,
S. D
ak.
(1)
Ft. Y
ates
H S
...-2
/Ft.
Yat
es, N
. Dak
.(2
7),_
----
----
"---
----
-4
Stud
ent T
otal
N 3
7
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
< -
Sch
ool N
on-A
ttend
ance
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drca
u, S
. Dak
.(2
)
Che
yenn
e-E
agle
But
teE
agle
But
te, S
. Dak
.(1
)
<Ft
. Yat
es H
S(2
1)
>Fl
andr
eau
hid.
Sch
.(2
)
._._
_.).
> F
t. Y
ates
H S
(19)
5 (1
966-
67)
*D?
c;T
-->
St.
PauP
s In
d.-
-1
1
4 Ft
. Yat
es H
S2
114
15
> F
land
reau
Ind
. Sch
.Fl
andr
eau
Ind.
Sch
.(2
)
Har
lem
H S
Har
lew
S--
>H
arle
in I
I S
Har
lem
, Mon
t.(1
)(1
)(1
)
Mob
ridg
e H
SM
obri
dge,
S. D
ak.
(1)
32
>M
obri
dge
H S
) M
obri
dge
II S
_1
> M
obri
dge
H S
1
(1)
(1)
--
11
2824
FIG
. 24
(Ft.
Yat
es)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
193
7
(2)
(1)
(11)
18
85
TABLE 74. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN FT. YATES ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
Sex Total N N (:i N .`:'
Male
Female
Total
17
20
37
3
1
4
17.7
5.0
10.8
3
1
4
21.4
5.3
12.1
2
g.,
5
18 2
16.7
17.2
1
,).,
4
11.1
20.0
16.7
1966-67TOTAL
N C74L N %
1 12.5 10 58.8
1 8.3 9 45.0
2 10.0 19 51.4
86
TABLE 75. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 37 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN FT. YATES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 4 58.0 4 86.8 5 54.0 4 23.5 2 58.0
Persister 33 83.9 26 85.6 23 93.3 20 92.4 18 89.9
TABLE 76. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LE TTER GRADINGS TO JUNE , 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 37 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN FT. YATES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
N A 11. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
4 D 4 D 4 Df 2 D+ 2 C+
33 C- 28 C- 23 C- 20 C+ 17 C+
-1,
1
I
1
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
2 (1
963-
64)
_,,,-
--
Man
dare
e H
SM
anda
ree
H S
.--
>M
anda
ree
H S
c--
>M
anda
ree
H S
----
> M
anda
ree
H S
3 (1
964-
65)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, N
. Dak
.(1
)
4 (1
965-
66)
--).
Fla
ndrc
au I
nd.
(1)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
GT
rlan
drea
u hi
d.-
-1
Man
dare
e, N
. Dak
.(1
0)(1
0)(9
)(6
)
Ber
ea F
ound
. Sch
.B
erea
, Ken
tuck
y(1
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
010
108
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
!ste
rG
- G
radu
ate
FIG
. 25
(Man
dare
e) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
1
1-
33
Yat
es I
I S
Ft. Y
ates
, N. D
ak.
-1
-
Ber
ea F
ound
. Sch
.-
1
1 1
(1)
(1)
(5)
13
88
TABLE 77. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMFRICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLFD IN MANDAREE HIGH
SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N c,A N N qc N clx N e-k N %
Male 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Female 6 G 0.0 0 0.0 2 33.3 1 25.0 1 33.3 4 66.7
Total 10 0 0.0 0 O. 0 9 20.0 1 12.5 1 14.3 4 40.0
-
89
TABLE 78. AVERAGE ANNUAL A TTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN MANDAREE HIGH SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1362
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N N c7.-c N ci,c N (7( N (-
A
Dropout 0 0.0 0 0. (I 2 83.0 1 100.0 1 44.0
Persister 9 89.7 10 ES. 2 8 91.3 7 84.6 6 89.9
TABLE 79. AVERAGE ANNUA L GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN MANDAREE HIGH SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 C-
Persister 9 C, 10 C- 8 C- 7 C- 6 C
,..
'
f:t.1
*
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
New
Tow
n E
lem
. Sch
.N
ew T
own,
N. D
ak.
(12)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
2
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
P er
sis
ter
G -
Gra
duat
e
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
Man
dare
e H
S--
-- M
anda
ree
H S
> M
anda
ree
11 S
/Man
dare
e, N
. Dak
.(1
)(1
)(1
)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
-->
rla
ndre
au
iland
reau
,
N. D
ak.
(2)
(2)
10
New
Tow
n H
S(4
)
-->
Plan
drea
u In
d.(1
)
Ogl
ala
Com
m. S
ch.
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.(1
) 8
Cal
ifor
nia
(1)
5 (1
966-
67!
*DP
AFl
ardr
eau
thd.
Whi
te S
hiel
d H
SR
oseg
len,
N. D
alt.
1
> N
ew T
own
Fl S
-->
New
Tow
n II
S(3
)1
11
2
> O
glal
a C
omm
.(1
) 7
FIG
. 26
(New
Tow
n) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
.,;,*
#1
7
11
(2)
(2)
(2)
4
91
TABLE 80. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN NEW TOWN ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Toial N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 4 1 25. 0 1 33.3 0 0. 0 0 O. 0 1 50. 0 3 75. 0
Female 8 I 12. 5 1 14. 3 1 16. 7 1 20. 0 1 25. 0 5 62. 5
Total 12 2 16. 7 2 20. 0 1 12. 5 1 14. 3 2 33. 3 8 66. 7
92
TABLE 81. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
1
IN NEW TOWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % ... N q,c N % is
Dropout 2 86.5 2 93.0 1 72.0 1 11.0 2 70.0
Persister 10 90.1 8 93.9 7 94: 1 5 90.0 4 92.3
TABLE 82 . AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN NEW TOWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 1 D- 2 D-
Persister 7 D- 8 C-
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
C0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1
7 C- 4 C- 4 C
r.00
,0, I
N.s
'i0s1
.1^.
.s...
1ss,
1is
,.' '
''
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
St. A
nn's
Mis
sion
Sch
.B
elco
urt,
N. D
ak.
(30)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 3
0
* D
- D
ropo
utP
- Pe
rsis
ter
G -
Gra
duat
e
2 (1
963-
64)
Ass
umpt
ion
Abb
eyH
SR
icna
rdto
n, N
. Dak
.(1
)
Imm
a.iu
late
Con
cep.
H S
teph
an, S
. Dak
.(1
)
Flan
drea
u M
d. S
cth.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.(2
)
2<
Bel
cour
t H S
)B
elco
urt,
N. D
aklI
nlyr
t H S
Bel
cour
t H S
---4
Bel
cour
t H S
)Bel
cour
t H S
eol
< -
Sch
ool N
on-A
ttend
ance
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
Cr4
Ass
ump.
Abb
ey>
Ass
ump.
Abb
ey(1
)
.---
-->
Imm
ac. C
once
p(1
)
Flan
drea
u th
d.(2
)
(1)
5 (1
966-
67)
PG
Ass
ump.
Abb
ey
>Im
mac
. Con
cep.
>hn
rnac
. Con
cep.
(1)
Flan
drea
u M
d.(2
)
Tex
as(1
)
1
Flan
drea
u In
d.1
(20)
(1)
(17)
Cal
ifor
nia,
(1)
Not
re D
ame
Aca
dem
yW
illow
City
, N. D
ak.
(1)
>N
otre
Dam
e(3
)
2624
(16)
1 1 1
12
1012
Ron
a H
SR
olla
, N. D
ak.-
-R
olla
H S
(1)
22(1
)(3
)(1
3)16
FIG
. 27
(St.
Ann
's M
issi
on)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7C
Z)
CA
D
OP
94
TABLE 83. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS ENROLLED IN ST. ANN'S IPCSSION
SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 13 2 15. 4 3 27. 3 0 0. 0 3 37. 5 0 0. 0 8 61. 5
Female 17 0 0. 0 1 5. 9 2 12. 5 2 14. 3 1 8. 3 6 35. 3
r)
Total 30 2 6. 7 4 14. 3 2 8. 3 5 22. 7 1 5. 9 14 46. 7
.
95
TABLE 84. AVERAGE ANNUAL A TTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS AND
PERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 30 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN ST. ANN'S MISSION SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 2 51.5 4 57.8 1 76.0 4 74.0 0 0.0
Persister 26 90.9 22 92.1 21 95.0 16 91.8 16 91.3
TABLE 85. AVERAGE ANNUA L GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM
A TARGET POPULATION OF 30 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS, DROI OUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN ST. ANN'S MISSION SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA
IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Yeai 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 2 D- 0 N. A. .1 D 4 D+ 1 D+
Persister 22 B- 17 C- 17 C+ 16 C- 16 C+
96
TABLE 86. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMLkICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF NORTH DAKOTA SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN
STUDENTS IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67'1",".i ....1
-- .7. v1 ra. :..
Sex
Mae
Female
lbtal
Total N
41
58
99
N
6
2
8
a,0
14.6
3.5
8.1
N
8
3
11
a,0
22.9
5.4
12.1
N
2
9
11
%
7.4
17.0
13.8
N
4
9
13
r7/0
16.0
20.5
18.8
N
3
5
8
%.
14.3
14.3
14.3
N
23
28
51
in
56.1
48.3
51.5
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
He
Dog
Sch
ool
Mis
sion
, S. D
ak.
(12)
2 (1
963-
64)
St. F
ranc
Is
H S
7St. F
ranc
iri,
S. D
ak.
(3)
3 (1
964-
65)
St. F
ranc
is H
S(3
)
yTod
d C
ount
y Sc
h.>
Tod
d C
ount
y Sc
h.M
issi
on, S
. Dak
.(1
)
(6)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
29
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
Ogl
a la
Com
m. S
ch.
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.(1
) 5
4 (1
965-
6(t)
St. F
raic
ts H
S(1
) 1
FIG
. 28
(He
Dog
) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
ghSc
hool
s, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
98
TABLE 87. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS ENROLLED IN HE DOG SCHOOL,
SOUTH DAKOTA IN GaADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N N % N %
Male 2 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 100.0 0 O. 0 0 0.0 2 100.0
Female 10 3 30.0 4 57.1 2 66.7 1 100.0 9 0.0 10 100.0
Total 12 3 25.0 4 44.4 4 80.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 12 100.0
99
TABLE 88. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN HE DOG SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
N % N % N % N % N %
3 81.7 4 81.8 4 76.6 1 94.0 0 0.0
9 92.2 5 91.0 1 96.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
TABLE 89. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LET. 11 GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN HE DOG SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 19e4-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N A. Gr.
Dropout 2 C+ 1 D 2 C+ 1 B 0 N. A.
Persister 9 B- 5 C 1 B+ 0 N. A. 0 N. A.
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Hol
y R
osar
y M
issi
onPi
ne R
idge
, S. D
ak.
(50)
2 (1
963-
64)
Rap
id C
ity H
SR
apid
City
, S. D
ak.
(1)
/Hot
Spr
ings
H S
AH
ot S
prin
gs, S
. Dak
.(1
)
Che
yenn
e, W
yo.
(1)
Gor
don,
Neb
r.(1
)
>H
oly
Ros
ary
(27)
Ogl
ala
Com
m'4
1111
1111
1411
1111
1011
111S
ch.
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.(5
)
3 (1
964-
65)
----
> R
apid
flit
y H
S(3
)
>H
ot S
prin
gs H
S
Pine
Rid
ge P
ub. S
ch.
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.(1
)Je
ffer
son
H S
./.Po
rtla
nd, O
re.
(1)
(1)
4 (1
965-
66)
Rap
id C
ity I
I S
(1)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
GT
>R
apid
City
n s
-1
1
Hol
y R
osar
yH
oly
Ros
ary
-->
Hol
y R
osar
y
(27)
(25)
3-
1616
Ogl
ala
Com
m(4
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 5
036
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
36
Ogl
ala
Com
m.
1I
23
Tod
d C
o. S
ch.
Mis
sion
, S. D
ak.
--
22
33(4
)(1
)(2
1)22
FIG
.29
(Hol
y R
osar
y) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
ghSc
hool
s, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
101
TABLE 90. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGET
POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HOLY ROSARY MISSION
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRA.,E.' ZIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N cvio N %
Male 24 4 16. 7 0 0. 0 2 10. 0 4 22. 2 1 7.1 11 45. 8
Female 26 10 38. 5 0 0. 0 1 6. 3 3 20. 0 3 25. 0 17 65. 4
Total 50 14 28. 0 0 0. 0 3 8. 3 7 21. 2 4 15. 4 28 56. 0
102
TABLE 91. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 50 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLEDIN HOLY ROSARY MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65Grade 8
1965-66 1966-67
N cv/0 N % N oiAD N % N %
Dropout ii 73.4 0 0.0 2 89.0 6 67.7 4 94.3
Persister 33 95.3 32 97.2 30 94.6 24 95.8 19 96.3
TABLE 92. AVERAGE ANNUA L GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 50 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN HOLY ROSARY MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65Grade 8
W65-66 1966-67
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 9 C+ 0 N. A. 2 D+ 2 D+ 2 D+
Persister 30 C- 22 C- 26 C 17 C+ 20 C+
,r4w
w,=
$vnv
pi,;4
7,T
zw,5
=up
l,wR
igm
ggm
poR
IG=
amiN
mw
,74
1
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Imm
acul
ate
Con
cept
ion
Mis
sion
Sch
ool
----
> I
mm
ac. C
once
p.St
epha
n, S
. Dak
.(1
5)(2
2)
.,
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Ft. T
hom
oson
Ele
m.
Ft. T
hom
pson
, S. D
ak.
(1)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.(1
)
6.-W
dent
Tol
al N
22
*ID
- D
ropo
utP
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
Pier
re I
nd. S
ch.
Pier
re, S
. Dak
.(1
)
Imm
ac. C
once
p.(1
1)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
Flan
drea
u In
d.Fl
andr
eau
Ind.
(1)
11
Gan
n V
alle
y H
SG
ann
Val
ley,
Gan
n V
alle
y H
SS.
Dak
.(1
)(1
)
McI
ntos
h H
SM
cInt
osh,
S. D
ak.
(1)
Pier
re H
SPi
erre
, S. D
ak.
(1)
Tim
ber
Lak
e H
ST
imbe
r L
akes
S. D
ak. -
> T
imbe
r L
ake
H S
(1)
(1)
1715
Mad
dock
H S
Mad
dock
, N. D
ak.
(1)
Gan
n V
alle
y H
S
Imm
ac. C
once
p.>
Im
mac
. Con
cep.
(8)
Cal
ifor
nia
(2)
77
11
Cla
rem
ont H
SC
lare
mon
t, S.
Dak
.1
1
13(1
)(1
)(9
)10
FIG
.30
(Im
mac
ulat
e C
once
ptio
n) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
InI
104
TABLE 93. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN IMMACULATE CONCEPTION
MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EICitil , NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N c,/o N % N %
Male 12 b 41. 7 1 14. 3 2 33.3 0 0. 0 1 25. 0 9 75. 0
Female 10 0 0. 0 1 10. 0 0 0. 0 2 22. 2 0 0. 0 3 30. 0
Total 22 5 22. 7 2 11. 8 2 13.3 2 15. 4 1 9. 1 12 54. 6
- - lawO...
105
TABLE 94. AVERAGI: ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 22 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN IMMACULATE CONCEPTION MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % Iv.i., % N %
Dropout 5 90.0 2 60.6 1 37.0 2 54.0 1 69.0
Persister 17 94.1 14 94.3 13 98.5 10 94.0 10 99. C
TABLE 95. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 22 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN IMMACULATE CONCErTION MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
1
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 3 C+ 2 D+ 0 N. A. 2 D+ 0 N. A.
Persister 15 C- 13 C 12 C+ 9 C+ 9 c+
ti
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Litt
le E
agle
Day
Sch
.L
ittle
Eag
le, S
. Dak
.(1
0)
1.10
,^,
fc.1
m%
r øw
AT
V9
0,IF
'Fri
Mr1
,0'"
,s,V
,57W
Olir
VIr
i)1W
.`,V
rtW
ol.N
Otli
T17
/1'
4.73
1:1
;WI
+.1
2 (1
963-
64)
Ft. Y
ates
H S
Ft. Y
ates
, N. D
ak.
(5)
3 (1
964-
65)
Ft. Y
ates
H S
(5)
4 (1
965-
66)
6 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
Ft. Y
ates
H S
Ft. Y
ates
H S
(8)
12
35
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
09
98
*D -
Dro
pout
PPe
rsis
ter
G -
Gra
duat
e
FIG
. 31
(Litt
le E
agle
) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
no 1
967
(1)
(2)
(3)
5
4.1
TABLE 96. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE B Y PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN LITTLE EAGLE DAY
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
Sex Total N N crio N % N % N % N ceAl N %
Male 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.6 1 25.0 0 0.0 1 25.0
Female 6 1 16.7 0 0.0 1 20.0 1 25.0 1 33.3 4 66.7
Total 10 1 10.0 0 0.0 1 11.1 2 25.0 1 16.7 5 50.0
108
TABLE 97. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS AND
PERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLEDIN LITTLE EAGLE DAY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 97.0 2 80.5 1 98.0
Persister 9 97.3 8 97.3 8 97.9 6 96.5 5 93.0
TABLE 98 . AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN H4DIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN LITTLE EAGLE DAY SCHOOL. SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. G .
Dropout I. D 0 N. A. 1 D 2 D 1. D
Persister 9 C 9 C- 8 C- 6 C- 5 C-
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
.1,1
,1,,,
,,,I.
W,V
IP.1
.1i,.
...,,,
,olr
INW
'ralin
VO
ZY
-I'V
IOX
I'MW
.CV
1.-1
4F.R
MFN
Irt"
10.1
71,,M
9.M
.11.
7.77
0.47
r---
=ri
r
2 (1
963-
64)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.(1
)
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
GT
McI
ntos
h E
lem
.Sc
hool
> M
cInt
osh
H S
McI
ntos
h H
SM
cInt
osh
H S
McI
ntos
h H
SM
cInt
osh,
S. D
ak.
(5)
(5)
(4)
--
44
(8)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 8
6
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
54
-(4
)4
FIG
. 32
(McI
ntos
h) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
_
110
TABLE 99. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN McINTOSH ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1162-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N /0ci, N % N % N %
Male 3 1 33.3 1 50. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 66. 7
Female 5 1 20. 0 0 0. 0 1 25. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 40. 0
Total 8 2 25. 0 1 16. 7 1 20. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 4 50. 0
lii
TABLE 100. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE , 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 8 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN McINTOSH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1265-86 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 2 77.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Persister 6 80.2 5 83.8 0 0.0 4 87.0 4 84.5
TABLE 101 AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 8 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOU'IS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN McINTOSH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 1 D 0 N. A. 1 D- 0 N. A. 0 N. A.
Persister 4 D+ 4 D+ 2 C- 4 D 4 D-
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Pier
re B
oard
ing
S ch
ool
Pier
re, S
. Dak
.(7
0)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 7
0
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
2 (1
963-
64)
Rel
ianc
e H
SR
elia
nce,
S. D
ak.
(1)
Bra
iner
d hi
d. S
ch.
Hot
Spr
ings
, S. D
ak.
(1)
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
Chi
locc
o In
d. S
chC
hilo
cco
Ind.
> C
hilo
cco
Ind.
> C
hilo
cco
Ind.
Chi
locc
o, O
kla.
(1)
(1)
-71-
11
2(1
)
Bro
wni
ng H
SB
row
ning
, Mon
t.(1
)
Ogl
ala
Com
m. S
ch.
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.(1
)
Bro
wni
ng H
S(2
)
Flsn
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u In
d.>
Fla
ndre
au I
nd.
Flan
drea
u In
d.Fl
andr
eau,
S. D
ak.
(1)
(25)
Plan
kint
onSt
. Tr.
Sch
.(1
9)(3
0)la
nkin
ton,
S. D
ak.
(1)
Col
orad
o (P
ublic
)-->
ailli
ngs
H S
--->
Har
din
H S
Har
din
H S
(1)
Bill
ings
, Mon
t.H
ardi
n, M
ont.
(1)
(1)
(1)
Jam
esto
wn
Men
t. In
st.
Jam
esto
wn,
N. D
ak.
(1)
Ft. Y
ates
Fed
. H S
(15)
) FL
. Yat
es H
Ste
(14)
>Ft
. Yas
H S
Pt. Y
ates
, N. D
ak.
(16)
Wak
pala
H S
Wak
pala
, S. D
ak.-
-->
Wak
pala
H S
>W
akpa
la H
S>
Wak
pala
H S
(1)
(1)
(1)
1-
--
31
1213
H S
-->
Bill
ings
-1
-1
Ft. Y
ates
HS
2-
66
Man
dare
e Fe
d. H
SM
anda
ree
H S
Man
dare
e, S
. Dak
.(2
)(2
)
Mou
ntai
n V
iew
H S
(Cor
rect
iona
l)H
elen
a, M
ont.
(1)
56
Bus
by h
id. S
ch.
Bus
by, M
ont.
(1)
47
>M
anda
ree
H(2
)
39
FIG
. 33
(Pie
rre)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2-
June
196
7
Man
dare
e H
S2
Hal
liday
H S
>H
allid
ay H
SH
allid
ay, N
. Dak
.-
11
(1)
(8)
(3)
(20)
23
v4.
`';'
"c-
'.4
4) ..
,:',4
144
4rp
r'"
,4-
,,
,0."
14...
.4.
tof
t 4'
4,4
0O
F
P.,:4
"
.;:"'9
,V
QJJ
113
TABLE 102. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN PIERRE BOARDING
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 25 5 20.0 3 15.0 2 11.8 3 20.0 3 25.0 16 64.0
Female 45 9 20.0 6 16.7 6 20.0 5 20.8 5 26.3 31 68.5
Total 70 14 20.0 9 16.1 8 17.0 8 20.5 8 25.8 47 67.1
114
TABLE 103. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 70 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN PIERRE BOARDING SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 14 100.0 8 78.1 8 70.1 8 67.4 7 65.0
Persister 5g 98.6 45 95.9 37 97.1 28 95.5 21 93.1
TABLE 104. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE , 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 70 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN PIERRE BOARDING SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
14 B- 7 D+ 5 D+ 5 D- 2 D-
54 B- 42 C- 36 D+ 28 C- 21 C+
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
ET
ff---
=-1
=I =
1I =
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Hol
y R
osar
y M
issi
onH
oly
Ros
ary
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.(2
)(1
) Com
m. S
ch.=
----
---
Ogl
ala
Com
m.
Pine
Rid
ge P
ublic
Sch
ool
ine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.(2
)Pi
ne R
idge
, S. D
ak.
(6)
(11)
Neb
rask
a-4
Neb
rask
a(1
)(1
)
1110
4.V
I'MW
MIN
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
QM
. ,
--H
oly
Ros
ary
Hol
y R
osar
y(2
)1
12
Ogl
ala
Com
m.
(3)
Neb
rask
a(1
)
Ogl
ala
Com
m.
11
Abe
rdee
n H
SA
berd
een,
Ida
ho1
1
Neb
rask
a1
1
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
78
56
(3)
(2)
5
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
< -
Sch
ool N
on-A
ttenl
ance
FIG
. 34
(Pin
e R
idge
) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
7
116
TABLE 105. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN PINE RIDGE PUBLIC
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N coio N % N %
Male 6 1 16. 7 2 40. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 3 50. 0
Female 5 1 20. 0 1 25. 0 0 0. 0 1 33. 3 0 0. 0 3 60. 0
Total 11 2 18. 2 3 33. 3 0 0. 0 1 16.7 0 0. 0 6 54. 6
117
TABLE 106. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 11 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN PINE RIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65Grade 8
1965-66 1966-67
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 2 60. 5 3 79.7 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0
Persister 9 93.7 4 95. 3 2 95. 5 2 89. 0 i 96. 0
TABLE 107. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 11 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN PINE RIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65Grade 8
1965-66 1966-67
Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 1 D- 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A.
Persister 9 C÷ 5 C- 3 C- 4 C- 5
LJ
1,4,
Z1,
1561
,*,1
,?ve
ml,q
,,,up
+T
ICY
4111
.--?
tiVIN
'IM.1
1+,7
0,11
1W,IM
,77-
)VP
IA:V
IVIT
ITIT
AT
T ,
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
2 (1
963-
64)
Gra
de 8
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
00
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
Hol
y R
osar
y M
issi
onSc
hool
Hol
y R
osar
yH
oly
Ros
ary
>H
oly
Ros
ary
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.(I
)(2
)-
11
(3)
Porc
upin
e D
ay S
choo
lPo
rcup
ine,
S. D
ak.
Ogl
ala
Com
m. S
ch.
(14)
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
(7)
Wak
pala
H S
Wak
pala
, S. D
ak.
(1)
Ogl
ala
Com
m.V
NO
glal
a C
omm
.gl
ala
Com
m.
(3)
(8)
11
78
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
411
1010
(1)
(1)
(8)
9
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
FIG
.35
(Por
cupi
ne)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nte
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
nni
4
TF;
119
TABLT; 108. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN PORCUPINE DAY
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
FiGrade 8
f
<
1
4,
ram,
TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N N %
10 2 20. 0 1 12. 5 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 14. 3 4 40. 0
Female 4 1 25. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0- 0 1 25. 0
Total 14 5 21. 4 1 9. 1 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 10. 0 5 35. 7
120
TABLE 109. A VERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE , 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 14 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN PORCUPINE DAY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 3 92.0 1 61.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 82.0
Persister 11 96.6 9 89.0 10 96.1 10 88.8 9 97.7
TABLE 110. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE , 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 14 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN PORCUPINE DAY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1982-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. G
Dropout 3 B 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D
Persister 11 B 9 D+ 8 C- 9 D+ 9 C-
I1
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
St. F
ranc
is M
issi
on S
choo
lSt
. Fra
ncis
, S. D
ak.
(23)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 2
3
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
2 (1
963-
64)
Tod
d C
ount
y H
SM
issi
on, S
. Dak
.(1
)
3 (1
964-
65)
McI
ntos
h H
SM
cInt
osh,
S. D
ak.
(1)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
>St
. Fra
ncis
H S
> S
t. Fr
anci
s H
S>
St. F
ranc
is H
SSt
. Fra
ncis
H S
St. F
ranc
is, S
. Dak
.(1
9)(1
5)(2
1)
Nor
th J
r. 4
1 S
Rap
id C
ity, S
. Dak
.(1
)
23
Nor
th J
r. H
S(1
)
2115
FIG
. 36
(St.
Fran
cis)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
Ada
, Okl
a.1
1
(1)
(2)
(11)
13
314
Z.
122
TABLE111. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ST. FRANCIS MISSION
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMEER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 12 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 3 25. 0 1 11. 1 0 0. 0 4 33. 3
Female 11 0 0. 0 2 18. 2 3 33. 3 0 0. 0 1 16. 7 6 54. 6
Total 23 0 0. 0 2 8. 7 6 28. 6 1 6. 7 1 7. 1 10 43. 5
sr
123
TABLE 112. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 23 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, ENROLLED
IN ST. FRANCIS MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Dropout
Persister
N % N % N % N % N %
0 0.0 2 64.5 5 91.0 1 25.0 1 17.0
23 100.0 21 96.0 15 99.9 14 99.9 13 93.9
TABLE 113. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 23 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN ST. FRANCIS MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66" 1966-67
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A. 1 D+ 2 C+ 0 N. A. 0 N. A.
Persister 23 C+ 20 C- 15 C 14 C- 13 C-
410.
7111
1112
010,
Vel
yo,1
^,00
,51.
013.
10%
-41
pom
1,01
Vyv
,,q1F
if,,,
1"ty
pen.
"4",
,1
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
St. J
osep
h's
Mis
sion
Cha
mbe
rlai
n, S
. Dak
.(3
0)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 3
0
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
2 (1
963-
64)
Pier
re I
nd. S
ch.
Pier
re, S
. Dak
(1)
Ter
ry H
Ser
ry, M
ont.
Ter
ry H
ST
erry
H S
(1)
(1)
(1)
3 (1
964-
65)
4 (1
965-
66)
--->
Pie
rre
Ind.
Sch
>Pi
erre
hid
. Sch
.
,
41-
6 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
Pier
re I
nd. S
ch.
-1
1
--->
Ter
ry H
S
Che
yenn
e-E
agle
But
te H
S>
Che
yenn
e-E
agle
> C
heye
nne-
Eag
leC
heye
nne-
Eag
leE
agle
But
te, S
. Dak
.B
utte
H S
But
te H
SB
utte
H S
(1)
(2)
(3)
1-
22
Get
tysb
urg
H S
etty
sbur
g, S
. Dak
.(1
)
Imm
ac. C
once
p. H
SSt
epha
n, S
. Dak
.Im
mac
. Con
cep.
(4)
(5)
Ft. Y
ates
H S
Ft. Y
ates
, S. D
ak>
Ft. Y
ates
H S
(4)
(3)
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.(3
)Fl
andr
eau
Ind.
(3)
Ogl
ala
Com
m. S
ch.
Pine
Rid
ge, S
. Dak
.>
Ogl
ala
Com
m.
(1)
(1)
> I
mm
ac. C
once
p.Im
mac
. Con
cep.
(4)
4
----
> F
t. Y
ates
H S
>Ft
. Yat
es H
S(3
)1
2
4 3
Flan
drea
u In
d.>
Fla
ndre
au I
nd.
(3)
22
Ogl
ala
Com
m.
Bot
tinea
u H
SB
ottin
eau,
N. D
ak.
Bot
tinea
u H
S--
-->
Bot
tinea
u H
S(1
)(2
)(2
)B
elco
urt H
S
5.O
glal
a C
omm
.
ham
berl
ain
H S
Cha
mbe
rlai
n, S
. Dak
.(1
)
St. P
aul's
Ind
. Sch
.M
arty
, S. D
ak.
> S
t. Pa
ul's
Ind
.(2
)(2
)
elia
nce
H S
Rel
ianc
e, S
. Dak
.(2
)
22
>R
elia
nce
H S
(2)
22
St. P
aul's
Ind
.(2
)
Rel
ianc
e H
S(1
)
21
Bel
cour
t, N
. Dak
.C
entr
al H
S-
22
Min
neap
olis
,M
inne
sota
---
> C
entr
al H
S(1
)1
FIG
. 37
(St.
Jose
ph's
Mis
sion
) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls,
Nov
. 196
2 -
June
196
7
Oa
> S
t. Pa
ul's
bid
.-
11
>R
elia
nce
H S
-1
1
(2)
(1)
(17)
18
125
TABLE 114. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ST. JOSEPH'S MISSION
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 17 2 11. 8 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 13.3 4 23. 5
Female 13 6 46. 2 0 0. 0 1 14. 3 1 16. 7 0 0. 0 8 61. 5
Total 30 8 26. 7 0 0. 0 1 4. 6 1 4. 8 2 10. 0 12 40. 0
126
TABLE 114 AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 30 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN ST. JOSEPH'S MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N % N %
Dropout 8 98.1 0 0.0 0 O. 0 1 47.0 2 81.5
Persister 22 95.5 17 97.8 18 97.7 17 96.8 16 95.3
TABLE 116. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 30 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN ST. JOSEPH'S MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 8 C- 0 N. A, 1 D 0 N. A. 1 D+
Persister 22 C+ 21 C- 21 C- 20 C- 18 C+
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Siss
eton
Ele
m. S
ch.
Siss
eton
, S. D
ak.
(12)
Lin
coln
Jr.
H S
Boi
se, I
daho
(1)
= E
1=
I14
ti,r
4
2 (1
963-
64)
3 (1
964-
65)
Peev
er H
SPe
ever
, S. D
ak.
(1)
Siss
et(i
n H
S(8
)
\Har
din
H S
Har
din,
Mon
t.a)
(1)
Siss
eton
H S
7)(I
)
'NG
rani
te F
alls
,M
inne
sota
Gra
nite
Fal
ls(1
)(1
)
4 (1
965-
66)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
Che
yenn
e-E
agle
But
teH
SE
agle
But
te, S
.(1
)
isse
ton
H S
SiR
sete
n T
SSi
sset
on H
S(5
)\
(1)
2-
44
Wat
erto
wn
H S
Wat
erto
wn,
S. D
ak.
(1)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 1
211
*D -
Dro
pout
PPe
rsis
ter
G -
Gra
duat
e
> H
ardi
n H
S(1
)
Wat
erto
wn
H S
(1)
Plan
kint
onng
. Sch
.Pl
anki
nton
,S.
Dak
.(1
)
Flan
drea
u hi
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
land
reau
Ind
.(1
)(1
)
>G
rani
te F
alls
-1
*Wat
erto
wn
H S
----
-),W
ater
tow
n H
S(1
)
109
FIG
.3?
(Sis
seto
n) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
-1
1 1
(2)
-(6
)6
128
TABLE 117. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE , 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN SISSETON ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-1.36 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 5 0 0. 0 1 20. 0 1 25. 0 1 33. 3 0 0. 0 3 60. 0
Female 7 1 14. 3 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 33. 3 3 42. 9
Total 12 1 8. 3 1 9. 1 1 10. 0 1 11. 1 2 25. 0 6 50, 0
TABLE 118. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN SISSETON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-.64 1964-65 1965-66
N % ...17.- % N % N %
Dropout 1 56.0 1 95.0 1 61.0 1 74.0
Persister 11 96.3 10 93.3 9 93.4 8 91.5
TABLE na AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TU,JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN SISSETON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GFtADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
P.3{I.1,
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66
Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av.- Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 0 N. A.
Persister 11 C-
1 D- 1 D 0
10 C- 9 C- 8
N. A. 0 N. A.
6- 6 C-
YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
2 (1
963-
64)
/
Siss
etci
n H
S-S
isse
ton,
S. D
ak.
(1)
Ben
son
Co.
Tr.
Sch
.M
addo
ck, N
. Dak
.(1
)
Bel
cour
t Hig
hT
ekak
with
a In
dian
Bel
cour
t, N
. Dak
.C
hild
ren'
s H
ome
(1)
Siss
eton
, S. D
ak.
(8)
3 (1
964-
66)
> S
isse
ton
H S
(i)
Pow
ell C
ount
y H
SD
eer
Lod
ge, M
ont.
(1)
St. P
aul,
Min
n.(1
)
4 (1
965-
66)
I-i
CO 0
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
GT
Imm
acul
ate
Con
cepU
onIm
mac
. Con
cep.
Ir.h
.tmac
. Con
cep.
Step
han,
S. D
ak.
(2)
1-
11
(1)
>B
elco
urt H
igh
Bel
cour
t Hig
h(1
)(1
)
Min
neap
olis
, Min
n.(1
)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 8
6
*13
- D
ropo
utP
- Pe
rsis
ter
G -
Gra
ckia
te
St. P
aul,
Min
n.(1
)St
. Pau
l, M
iun.
(1)
Min
neap
olis
, Min
n.(1
)
54
RG
.39
(Tek
akw
itha)
Mov
emen
t of
Indi
an S
tude
nts
Thr
ough
Sch
ools
, Nov
. 196
2-
June
196
7
..
(1)
(1)
1
-
L
131
TABLE 120. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN TEKAKWITHA INDIAN
CHILDREN'S HOME, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %
Male 1 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 100. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 100. 0
Female 7 2 28. 6 1 20. 0 0 0. 0 2 50. 0 1 50. 0 6 85. 7
Total 8 2 25. 0 1 16. 7 1 20. C 2 50. 0 1 50. 0 7 87. 5
132
TABLE 121. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 8 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN TEKAKWITHA LNDIAN CHILDREN'S HOME, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N % N % N % N crio N %
Dropout 1 100.0 1 76.0 1 76.0 2 67.5 1 50.0
Persister 7 99.3 5 93.4 4 93.8 2 100.0 1 100.0
TABLE 122. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 8 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN TEKAKWITHA INDIAN CHILDREN'S HOME, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. G
Dropout 1 C 1 D- 1 D 1 D- 1 C
Persister 6 C 4 C- 3 D+ 2 C+ 1 C+
`447
i,g-I
F,75
.34)
, YE
AR
1 (
1962
-63)
Gra
de 8
Tod
d C
ount
yE
lem
. Sch
ool
Mis
sion
, S. D
ak.
(46)
Stud
ent T
otal
N 4
6
*D -
Dro
pout
P -
Pers
iste
rG
- G
radu
ate
+-
1 D
ecea
sed
rI
=rs
.71=
2 (1
963-
64)
Ben
nett
Cou
nty
H S
Mar
tin, S
. Dak
.(1
)
3 (1
964-
65)
Ben
nett
Cou
nty
H S
(1)
St. F
ranc
is H
SSt
. Fra
ncis
, S. D
ak.
St. F
ranc
is H
S(1
)(3
)
Tod
d C
ount
y H
S+
----
----
----
>M
issi
on, S
. Dak
.(3
5)
Lon
gmon
t H S
Lon
gmon
t, C
ol.
(1)
>T
odd
Cou
nty
H S
(21)
4 (1
965-
66)
>St
. Fra
ncis
H S
(3)
5 (1
966-
67)
*DP
G
----
> S
t. Fr
anci
s H
S-
11
>T
odd
Cou
nty
H S
> T
odd
Cou
nty
H S
(17)
2-
1414
1
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.-->
Flan
drea
u In
d. S
ch.
(1)
(1)
11
Cal
ifor
nia
1
> F
land
reau
Ind
. Sch
.
WO
Flan
drea
u H
Sub
lic)
Flan
drea
u, S
. Dak
.(1
)Fl
andr
eau
H S
(1)
Rap
id C
ity H
SR
apid
City
, S. D
ak.
-
Eas
t Cha
rles
Mix
H S
Wag
ner,
S. D
ak.
>E
. Cha
rles
Mix
H S
E. C
harl
es M
ix H
S(1
)(1
)(1
)
3828
23(3
)-
(17)
17
FIG
.40
(Tod
d C
ount
y) M
ovem
ent o
f In
dian
Stu
dent
s T
hrou
gh S
choo
ls, N
ov. 1
962
- Ju
ne 1
967
CID
134
TABLE 12a PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN TODD COUNTY ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1P82-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N 9O
Male 28 5 17. 9 5 21. 7 3 16. 7 2 13. 3 2 15. 4 17 60. 7
Female 18 3 16. 7 4* 26. 7 2 20. 0 1 12. 5 1 14. 3 11 64. 7
Total 46 8 17. 4 9 23. 7 5 17. 9 3 13. 0 3 15. 0 28 62. 2
* - 1 Deceased
UI
11
Li
IJ
II
135
TABLE 124. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 46 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED
IN TODD COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
Dropout
Persister
8 68.6 9 85.2 5 79.4 3 83.0 3 85.3
38 91.0 29 92.2 23 94.7 20 94.6 17 95.7
TABLE 125. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 46 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,
ENROLLED IN TODD COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8
N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.
Dropout 3 C+ 5 D+ 4 D+ 3 D+ 1 D
Persister 35 C+ 29 C- 23 C 20 C+ 17 C+
136
TABLE 126. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN
STUDENTS IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL
Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N
Male 149 25 16.8 14 11.3 16 14.6 12 12.8 10 12.2 77 51.7
Female 167 38 22.8 19* 14.7 17 15.6 17 18.5 14 18.7 105 63.3
Total 316 63 19.9 33 13.0 33 15.1 29 15.6 24 15.3 182 57.8
* - 1 Deceased
ii
r-
137
TABLE 127. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF SCHOOLS IN A SDC-STATE AREA ENROLLING TEN OR MORE
INDIAN STUDENTS IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962
Year 1962-63
Grade 8
1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67
TOTAL
State Sex Total N N % N N N % N % N %
Oregon Mae 19 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 5.3 2 11.1 3 15.8
Female 23 0 0.0 1 4.4 1 4.6 4* 19.1 3 18.8 9 40.9
Total 42 0 0.0 1 2.4 1 2.4 5 12.5 5 14.7 12 29.3
Washington Male 46 1 2.2 5 11.1 5 12.5 4 11.4 1 3.2 16 34.8
Female 45 1 2.2 3 6.8 10 24.4 3 9.7 2 7.1 19 42.2
Total 91 2 2.2 8 9.0 15 18.5 7 10.6 3 5.1 35 38.5
Idaho Male 16 0* 0.0 2 13.3 1 7.7 0 0.0 1 8.3 4 26.7
Female 17 0 0.0 3 17.7 0 0.0 1 7.1 3 23.1 7 41.2
Total 33 0 0.0 5 15.6 1 3.7 1 3.9 4 16.0 11 34.4
Nknitana Male 132 13 9.9 6 5.0 13 11.5 8 8.0 9 9.8 49 37.1
Female 127 14 11.0 9 8.0 17 16.4 12 13.8 7 9.3 59 46.5
Total 259 27 10.4 15 6.5 30 13.8 20 10.7 16 9.6 108 41.7
North Dakota Mee 41 6 14.6 8 22.9 2 7.4 4 16.0 3 14.3 23 56.1
Female 58 2 3.5 3 5.4 9 17.0 9 20.5 5 14.3 28 48.3
Total 99 8 8.1 11 12.1 11 13.8 13 18.8 8 14.3 51 51.5
SoutliDalcota Male 149 25 16.8 14 11.3 16 14.6 12 12.8 10 12.2 77 51.7
Female 167 38 22.8 19* 14.7 17 15.6 17 18.5 14 18.7 105 63.3
Total 316 63 19.9 33 13.0 33 15.1 29 15.6 24 15.3 182 57.8
GRAND TOTAL 840 100 11.9 73 9.9 91 13.7 75 13.1 60 12.1 399 47.7
* - 1 Deceased
RACIAL BALANCE BY STATES (INDIAN COMPARED TONON-INDIAN STUDENT POPULATION) IN THE
SCHOOLS INCLUDED IN THE STUDY
In the following: "Majority" is where Indian students constitute 60
percent or more of the student population in a grade level; "Balance" is where
they are 40-59 percent of the student population; and "Minority" is where
Indian pupils comprise 39 percent or less of the student population. "Other"
refers to pupAls who are deceased, dropped out of school in that year, or for
whose school no record of racial balance was available. The number (N) of
Indian pupils enrolled in grade 8 is as of November, 1962, and the number of
Indian pupils enrolled in grade 10 is as of November of the year the students
attended grade 10.
OREGON
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade minority:
Then in the tenth grade these Indian pupils were:
Majority:Balance:Minority:Other:
N =
N =N =N =N =
42
2
0
400
100%
5%0%
95%0%
WASHINGTON
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade majority:
N = 31 34%
Then in the tenth grade these Indian pupils were:
Majority: N = 9 29%Balance: N = 0 0%Minority: N = 18 58%Other: N = 4 13%
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade minority:
N = 60 66%
Then in the tenth grade these Indian pupils were:
Majority: N = 0 0%
Balance: N = 0 0%
Minority: N = 54 90%
Other: N = 6 10%
Thus, for all Indian pupils in the tenth grade (included in this Study)in Washington:
Majority: N = 9 10%
Minority: N = 72 79%
Other: N = 10 11%
IDAHO
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade minority:
N = 33 100%
Then in the tenth grade these Indian pupils were:
Majority: N = 4 12%
Balance: N = 0 0%
Minority: N = 25 76,%
Other: N = 4 12%
MONTANA
Where the Indian pupils were 2n eighth grade majority:
N = 128 49%
Then in the tenth grade these Indian pupils were:
Majority: N = 86 67%
Balance: N = 0 0%
Minority: N = 1 1%
Other: N = 41 32%
139
140
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade balance:
Then in the tenth grade the Indian pupils were:
N = 62 24%
Majority: N = 6 10%Balance: N = 42 68%Minority: N = 1 1%Other: N = 13 21%
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade minority:
N = 69 27%
Then in the tenth grade the Indian pupils were:
Majority: N = 16 23%Balance: N = 1 1%Minority: N = 35 51%Other: N = 17 25%
Thus, for all Indian pupils in the tenth grade (included in this StUdy)in Montana:
Majority: N = 108 42%Balance: N = 43 17%Minority: N = 37 14%Other: N = 71 27%
NORTH DAKOTA
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade majority:
N = 87 88%
Then in the tenth grade the Indian pupils were:
Majority: N = 56 64%Balance: N = 0 0%
Minority: N = 10 12%Other: N = 21 24%
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade minority:
N = 12 12%
Then in the tenth grade the Indian pupils were:
Majority: N = 3 25%Balance: N = 0 0%
Minority: N = 4 33%Other: N = 5 42%
Thus, for all Indian pupils in the tenth grade (included in this Study)in North Dakota:
Majority: N = 59 60%
Minority: N = 14 14%
Other: N = 26 26%
SOUTH DAKOTA
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade majority:
N = 296 94%
Then in the tenth grade the Indian pupils were:
Majority: N = 168 57%Balance: N = 0 0%
Minority: N = 13 4%
Other: N = 115 39%
Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade minority:
N = 20 6%
Then ii the tenth grade the Indian pupils were:
Majority: N = 0 0%
Balance: N = 0 0%
Minority: N = 15 75%Other: N = 5 25%
141
142
Thus, for all Indian pupils in the tenth grade (included in this Study)in South Dakota:
Majority: N = 168 53%Minority: N = 28 9%Other: N = 120 38%
CONCLUSION
This study has differed from other dropout studies in that the
students registered in the same grade on a specific date who constituted
the target population were each identified by name. The progress
through school of each student was then traced to high school graduation
or another specific date almost five years later unless death or dropout
from school occurred prior to that time. The data of the study have
been presented in a series of figures and tables without any attempt to
interpret findings. Thus the study, wbile documenting the magnitude of
the problem of the American Indian high school dropout, also has
demonstrated the feasibility of collecting hard data in this area.
The need to collect on an ongoing basis specific up-to-date data
on the progress of pupils, as well as on graduates and follow-:up of
graduates for at least a year after high school graduation, is of great
importance. Even where some attempts have been made by individual
schools or school systems to collect such data, efforts have been
hampered by a lack of uniformity in the methodology of collecting informa-
tion and in recording it. School personnel become very frustrated trying
to find out what happens to a transfer student when the receiving school
does not cooperate in acknowledging the transfer or in transferring
student records.
144The initiative in setting up a data collection bank and regu-
larized system of transferring sWdent records needs to be taken by an
agency which could also serve as the coordinator of such efforts. The
State Departments of Education are almost ideally suited to undertaking
such a task. In addition to access to computer facilities, Departments
probably have the greatest contact with the many organizations engaged
in the educational enterprise.
The Bureau bf Indian Affairs, with its special interest in the
education of Indian youth, could explore the possibility of calling a
meeting of interested institutions. For example, the BIA area office in
Portland, Oregon, could invite representatives from Oregon, Washington
and Idaho State Departments of Education and representatives from public
and private schools as well as from its own organization to a sponsored
conference on these vital topics. Such a conference, or series of con-
ferences, in addition to opening wider the channels of communications
among the participating bodies, might well lead to a pooling and sharing
of information beyond that envisioned in this modest proposal.
APP
EN
DIX
A
:E'±
c4a=
1.
OR
EG
ON
SC
HO
OL
DIR
EC
TO
RY
(SC
HO
OL
S L
IST
ED
AL
PHA
BE
TIC
AL
LY
BY
ST
AT
E W
HIC
H W
ER
EA
TT
EN
DE
D B
Y T
HE
TA
RG
ET
PO
PUL
AT
ION
OF
TH
EST
UD
Y,
NO
VE
MB
ER
, 196
2 -
JUN
E, 1
967)
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Ben
d H
igh
Scho
olB
end
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12H
elen
McC
une
Juni
or H
igh
Scho
olPe
ndle
ton
Publ
ic-D
ay7-
8Je
ffer
son
Hig
h Sc
hool
Port
land
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12M
ac L
aren
Sch
ool f
or B
oys
Woo
dbur
nSt
ate
Cor
rect
iona
l9-
12
Mad
ras
Juni
or H
igh
Scho
olM
adra
sPu
blic
-Day
7- 8
Mad
ras
Hig
h Sc
hool
Mad
ras
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12M
arsh
all H
igh
Scho
olPo
rtla
ndPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Mc
Ew
en H
igh
Scho
olA
then
aPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Nor
th S
alem
Hig
h Sc
hool
Sale
mPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Pend
leto
n H
igh
Scho
olPe
nd le
ton
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12R
ober
t S. F
arre
ll H
igh
Scho
olSa
lem
Stat
e C
orre
ctio
nal
9-12
Sand
y H
igh
Scho
olSa
ndy
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
Uni
vers
ity o
f O
rego
nE
ugen
eC
orre
spon
denc
eG
. E.D
.W
ynne
Wat
ts H
igh
Scho
olPo
rtla
ndPu
blic
-Day
9-12
WA
SHIN
GT
ON
SC
HO
OL
DIR
EC
TO
RY
(SC
HO
OL
S L
IST
ED
AL
PHA
BE
TIC
AL
LY
BY
ST
AT
E W
HIC
H W
ER
E A
TT
EN
DE
DB
Y T
HE
TA
RG
ET
PO
PUL
AT
ION
OF
TH
EST
UD
Y, N
OV
EM
BE
R,
1962
- J
UN
E, 1
967)
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Ale
xand
er J
unio
r H
igh
Scho
olB
ellin
gham
Tec
hnic
al S
choo
lFe
rnda
leB
ellin
gham
Publ
ic-D
ayPu
blic
-Day
7- 8
Ung
rade
dC
opp
le. J
unio
r H
igh
Scho
olO
mak
Publ
ic-D
ay7-
8C
oule
e D
am H
igh
Scho
olC
oule
e D
ani
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
Eas
t Val
ley
Hig
h Sc
hool
Spok
ane
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12E
isen
how
er H
igh
Scho
olY
akim
aPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Fern
dale
Hig
h Sc
hool
Fern
dale
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12H
oqui
am J
unio
r H
igh
Scho
olH
oqui
amPu
blic
-Day
7- 8
Inch
eliu
m E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
lIn
chel
ium
Publ
ic-D
ay1-
8In
chel
ium
Hig
h Sc
hool
Inch
eliu
mPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Jeff
erso
n Ju
nior
Hig
h Sc
hool
Oly
mpi
aPu
blic
-Day
7- 8
Mar
y W
alke
r H
igh
Scho
olSp
ring
dale
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
Moc
lips
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
Moc
lips
Publ
ic-D
ay1-
8M
oclip
s H
igh
Scho
olM
oc li
psPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Nea
h B
ay E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
lN
eah
Bay
Publ
ic-D
ay1-
8N
eah
Bay
Hig
h Sc
hool
Nea
h B
ayPu
blic
-Day
9-12
WA
SHIN
GT
ON
SC
HO
OL
DIR
EC
TO
RY
(C
ontin
ued)
(SC
HO
OL
S L
IST
ED
AL
PHA
BE
TIC
AL
LY
BY
ST
AT
E W
HIC
HW
ER
E A
TT
EN
DE
D B
Y T
HE
TA
RG
ET
PO
PUL
AT
ION
OF
TH
E S
TU
DY
, NO
VE
MB
ER
,19
62 -
JU
NE
, 196
7)
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Nes
pele
m E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
lN
espe
lem
Publ
ic-D
ay1-
8O
kano
gan
Hig
h Sc
hool
Oka
noga
nPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Oly
mpi
a H
igh
Scho
olA
ubur
nPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Om
ak S
enio
r H
igh
Scho
olO
mak
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
Oro
ville
Hig
h Sc
hool
Oro
ville
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12O
thel
lo H
igh
Scho
olO
thel
loPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Que
en A
nne
Hig
h Sc
hool
Seat
tlePu
blic
-Day
9-12
Stev
enso
n H
igh
Scho
olSt
even
son
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
Top
peni
sh H
igh
Scho
olT
oppe
nish
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12W
apat
o E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
lW
apat
oPu
blic
-Day
1- 8
Wap
ato
Hig
h Sc
hool
Wap
ato
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12W
hite
Pas
s H
igh
Scho
olR
andl
ePu
blic
-Day
9-12
Whi
te S
wan
Hig
h Sc
hool
Whi
te S
wan
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12Y
e lm
Hig
h Sc
hool
Ye
lmPu
blic
-Day
9-12
1,
'.....
:_t±
.isio
......
'
1
MO
NT
AN
A S
CH
OO
L D
IRE
CT
OR
Y(S
CH
OO
LS
LIS
TE
D A
LPH
AB
ET
ICA
LL
Y B
Y S
TA
TE
WH
ICH
WE
RE
AT
TE
ND
ED
BY
TH
E
1-+
00
TA
RG
ET
PO
PUL
AT
ION
OF
TH
EST
UD
Y,
NO
VE
MB
ER
, 196
2 -
JUN
E, 1
967)
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Bill
ings
Hig
h Sc
hool
Bill
ings
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12B
ox E
lder
Hig
h Sc
hool
Box
Eld
erPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Bro
wni
ng H
igh
Scho
olB
row
ning
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12B
usby
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
Bus
byFe
dera
l-D
ay-B
oard
ing
1- 8
Bus
by H
igh
Scho
olB
usby
Fede
ral-
Day
- B
oard
ing
9-12
Chi
nook
Hig
h Sc
hool
Chi
nook
Publ
ic-
Day
9-12
Cut
Ban
k H
igh
Scho
olC
ut B
ank
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12D
odso
n H
igh
Scho
olD
odso
nPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Har
din
Juni
or H
igh
Scho
olH
ardi
nPu
blic
-Day
7- 8
Har
din
Hig
h Sc
hool
Har
din
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12H
arle
m H
igh
Scho
olH
arle
mPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Hav
re J
unio
r H
igh
Scho
olH
avre
Publ
ic-D
ay7-
8
Hav
re H
igh
Scho
olH
avre
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12H
ays
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
Hay
sPu
blic
-Day
k- 8
Hel
lgat
e H
igh
Scho
olM
isso
ula
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12L
odge
Gra
ss E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
lL
odge
Gra
ssPu
blic
-Day
1- 8
MO
NT
AN
A S
CH
OO
L D
TR
EC
TO
RY
(C
ontin
ued)
(SC
HO
OL
S L
IST
ED
AL
PHA
BE
TIC
AL
LY
BY
ST
AT
E W
HIC
H W
ER
E A
TT
EN
DE
DB
Y T
HE
TA
RG
ET
PO
PUL
AT
ION
OF
TH
E S
TU
DY
,N
OV
EM
BE
R, 1
962
- JU
NE
, 196
7)
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Lod
ge G
rass
Hig
h Sc
hool
Lod
ge G
rass
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12M
ount
ain
Vie
w H
igh
Scho
olH
elen
aSt
ate
Voc
atio
nal
9-12
Scho
ol f
or G
irls
Nox
on H
igh
Scho
olN
oxon
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
Popl
ar E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
lPo
plar
Publ
ic-D
ayk-
8Po
plar
Hig
h Sc
hool
Popl
arPu
blic
- D
ay9-
12Po
wel
l Cou
nty
Hig
h Sc
hool
Dee
r L
odge
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12R
onan
Hig
h Sc
hool
Ron
anPu
blic
-Day
9-12
St. I
gnat
ius
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
St. I
gnat
ius
Publ
ic-D
ay1-
8St
. Ign
atiu
s H
igh
Scho
olSt
. Ign
atiu
sPu
blic
-Day
9-12
St. L
abre
Mis
sion
Hig
h Sc
hool
Ash
land
Priv
ate-
Day
-Boa
rdin
g1-
12St
ate
Indu
stri
al S
choo
lM
iles
City
Stat
e C
orre
ctio
nal
9-12
Ter
ry H
igh
Scho
olT
erry
.Pu
blic
-Day
9-12
4'
IDA
HO
SC
HO
OL
DIR
EC
TO
RY
(SC
HO
OL
S L
IST
ED
AL
PHA
BE
TIC
AL
LY
BY
ST
AT
EW
HIC
H W
ER
E A
TT
EN
DE
D B
Y T
HE
TA
RG
ET
PO
PUL
AT
ION
OF
TH
EST
UD
Y, N
OV
EM
BE
R,
1962
-jUNE, 1967)
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Abe
rdee
n H
igh
Scho
olA
lam
eda
Jani
or H
igh
Scho
olB
lack
foot
Hig
h Sc
hool
Abe
rdee
nPo
cate
lloB
lack
foot
Publ
ic-D
ayPu
blic
-Day
Publ
ic-D
ay
9-12
7- 8
9-12
Bro
okly
n Ju
nior
Hig
h Sc
hool
Salm
onPu
blic
-Day
7- 8
Haw
thor
ne J
unio
r H
igh
Scho
olPo
cate
lloPu
blic
-Day
7- 8
Hig
hlan
d H
igh
Scho
olPo
cate
lloPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Lap
wai
Jun
ior-
Seni
or H
igh
Scho
olL
apw
aiPu
blic
-Day
7-12
Lin
coln
Jun
ior
Hig
h Sc
hool
Boi
sePu
blic
-Day
7-8
Poca
tello
Hig
h Sc
hool
Poca
tello
Publ
ic-D
ay9-12
St.
Ant
hony
Tra
inin
g C
ente
rSt
. Ant
hony
Stat
e C
orre
ctio
nal
9-12
Uni
vers
ity o
f Id
aho
Mos
cow
Cor
resp
onde
nce
G. E
.D
.
,16
=
NO
RT
H D
AK
OT
A S
CH
OO
L D
IRE
CT
OR
Y(S
CH
OO
LS
LIS
TE
D A
LPH
AB
ET
ICA
LL
Y B
YST
AT
E W
HIC
H W
ER
E A
TT
EN
DE
DB
Y T
HE
TA
RG
ET
PO
PUL
AT
ION
OF
TH
EST
UD
Y, N
OV
EM
BE
R,
1962
- J
UN
E, 1
967)
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Ass
umpt
ion
Abb
ey H
igh
Scho
olR
icha
rdto
nPr
ivat
e-D
ay-
Boa
rdin
g9-
12B
elco
urt H
igh
Scho
olB
elco
urt
Fede
ral-
Day
9-12
Ben
son
Cou
nty
Agr
icul
tura
l Tra
inin
g Sc
hool
Mad
dock
Publ
ic-D
ay-B
oard
ing
9-12
Bot
tinea
u H
igh
Scho
olB
ottin
eau
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
Dev
il's
Lak
e H
igh
Scho
olD
evil'
s L
ake
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12Fo
rt T
otte
n E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
lFo
rt T
otte
nFe
dera
l-D
ay1-
8Fo
rt Y
ates
Hig
h Sc
hool
Fort
Yat
esFe
dera
l-D
ay-B
oard
ing
9-12
Hal
liday
Hig
h Sc
hool
Hal
liday
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
Jam
esto
wn
Men
tal I
nstit
utio
nJa
mes
tow
nSt
ate
Inst
icut
ion
Ung
rade
dM
addo
ck H
igh
Scho
olM
addo
ckPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Man
dare
e H
igh
Scho
olM
anda
ree
Fede
ral-
Day
-Boa
rdin
gk-
12N
ew T
own
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
New
Tow
nPu
blic
-Day
k- 8
New
Tow
n H
igh
Scho
olN
ew T
own
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12N
otre
Dam
e A
cade
my
Will
ow C
ityPr
ivat
e-D
ay-B
oard
ing
9-12
Obe
ron
Hig
h Sc
hool
Obe
ron
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12R
olla
Pub
lic H
igh
Scho
olR
olla
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
St. A
nn's
Mis
sion
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
Bel
cour
tPr
ivat
e-D
ay-B
oard
ing
1- 8
Whi
te S
hiel
d H
igh
Scho
olR
oseg
len
Fede
ral-
Day
9-12
Will
isto
n H
igh
Scho
olW
illis
ton
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
SOU
TH
DA
KO
TA
SC
HO
OL
DIR
EC
TO
RY
(SC
HO
OL
S L
IST
ED
AL
PHA
BE
TIC
AL
LY
BY
ST
AT
EW
HIC
H W
ER
E A
TT
EN
DE
D B
Y T
HE
I-I
01 L\D
TA
RG
ET
PO
PUL
AT
ION
OF
TH
E S
TU
DY
, NO
VE
MB
ER
,19
62 -
JU
NE
, 196
7)
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Ben
nett
Cou
nty
Hig
h Sc
hool
Mar
tinPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Bra
iner
d In
dian
Sch
ool
Hot
Spr
ings
Priv
ate-
Boa
rdin
g1-
12C
ham
berl
ain
Hig
h Sc
hool
Cha
mbe
rlai
nPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Che
yenn
e-E
agle
But
te S
choo
lE
agle
But
teFe
dera
l-D
ay-B
oard
ing
k-12
Cla
rem
ont H
igh
Scho
olC
lare
mon
tPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Eas
t Cha
rles
Mix
Jun
ior-
Seni
or H
igh
Scho
olW
agne
rPu
blic
-Day
7-12
Flan
drea
u H
igh
Scho
olFl
andr
eau
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12Fl
andr
eau
Indi
an S
choo
lFl
andr
eau
Fede
ral-
Boa
rdin
g9-
12
Fort
Tho
mps
on E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
lFo
rt T
hom
pson
Fede
ral-
Day
1- 8
Gan
n V
alle
y H
igh
Scho
olG
ann
Val
ley
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12G
etty
sbur
g H
igh
Scho
olG
etty
sbur
gPu
blic
-Day
9-12
He
Dog
Sch
ool
Mis
sion
Fede
ral-
Day
1- 8
Hol
y R
osar
y M
issi
on S
choo
lPi
ne R
idge
Priv
ate-
Boa
rdin
gk-
12H
ot S
prin
gs H
igh
Scho
olH
ot S
prin
gsPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Imm
acul
ate
Con
cept
ion
Scho
olSt
epha
nPr
ivat
e-B
oard
ing
6-12
Litt
le E
agle
Day
Sch
ool
Litt
le E
agle
Fede
ral-
Day
1- 8
McI
ntos
h E
lem
enta
ry S
choo
lM
cInt
osh
Publ
ic-D
ay1-
8M
cInt
osh
Hig
h Sc
hool
McI
ntos
hPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Mob
ridg
e H
igh
Scho
olM
obri
dge
Publ
ic-D
ay10
-12
Nor
th J
unio
r H
igh
Scho
olR
apid
City
Publ
i c-D
ay7-
8
SOU
TH
DA
KO
TA
SC
HO
OL
DIR
EC
TO
RY
(Con
tinue
d)(S
CH
OO
LS
LIS
TE
D A
LPH
AB
ET
ICA
LL
YB
Y S
TA
TE
WH
ICH
WE
RE
AT
TE
ND
ED
BY
TH
ET
AR
GE
T P
OPU
LA
TIO
N O
F T
HE
STU
DY
, NO
VE
MB
ER
,19
62 -
JU
NE
, 196
7)
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Ogl
ala
Com
mun
ity S
choo
lPi
ne R
idge
Fede
ral-
Day
-Boa
rdin
g1-
12Pe
ever
Hig
h Sc
hool
Peev
erPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Pier
re B
oard
ing
Scho
olPi
erre
Fede
ral-
Boa
rdin
g1-
8Pi
ne R
idge
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
Pine
Rid
gePu
blic
-Day
k- 8
Plan
kint
on H
igh
Scho
olPl
anki
mon
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12Po
rcup
ine
Day
Sch
ool
Porc
upin
eFe
dera
l-D
ay1.
- 8
Rap
id C
ity H
igh
Scho
olR
apid
City
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12R
elia
nce
Hig
h Sc
hool
Rel
ianc
ePu
blic
-Day
9-12
St. F
ranc
is M
issi
on S
choo
lSt
. Fra
ncis
Priv
ate-
Boa
rdin
g1-
12St
. Jos
eph'
s In
dian
Sch
ool
Cha
mbe
rlai
nPr
ivat
e-B
oard
ing
1- 8
St. P
aul's
Ind
ian
Scho
olM
arty
Priv
ate-
Day
-Boa
rdin
g1-
12Si
sset
on H
igh
Scho
olSi
sset
onPu
blic
-Day
9-12
Tim
ber
Lak
e H
igh
Scho
olT
imbe
r L
ake
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12T
odd
Cou
nty
Ele
men
tary
Sch
ool
Mis
sion
Publ
ic-D
ayk-
8T
odd
Cou
nty
Hig
h Sc
hool
Mis
sion
Publ
ic-D
ay-B
oard
ing
9-12
Wak
pala
Hig
h Sc
hool
Wak
pala
Publ
ic-D
ay9-
12
Wat
erto
wn
Juni
or H
igh
Scho
olW
ater
tow
nPu
blic
-Day
7-. 9
Wat
erto
wn
Seni
or H
igh
Scho
olW
ater
tow
nPu
blic
-Day
10-1
2W
hite
Riv
er H
igh
Scho
olW
hite
Riv
erPu
blic
-Day
9-12
FED
ER
AL
SC
HO
OL
DIR
EC
TO
RY
(SC
HO
OL
S L
IST
ED
AL
PHA
BE
TIC
AL
LY
OU
TSI
DE
TH
E S
lX-S
TA
TE
RE
GIO
N O
FO
RIG
INA
TIO
NO
F PU
PIL
S W
HIC
H W
ER
E A
TT
EN
DE
DB
Y T
HE
TA
RG
ET
PO
PUL
AT
ION
o4=
OF
TH
E S
TU
DY
,N
OV
EM
BE
R, 1
962
- JU
NE
, 196
7)
OK
LA
HO
MA
Scho
olL
ocat
ion
Typ
eG
rade
s
Che
yenn
e-A
rapa
ho S
choo
lC
hilo
cco
Indi
an S
choo
lC
onch
o D
emon
stra
tion
Scho
olFo
rt S
ill I
ndia
n Sc
hool
Riv
ersi
de S
choo
l
Con
cho
Chi
locc
oC
onch
oL
awto
n.A
nada
rko
Fede
ral-
Boa
rdin
gFe
dera
l-B
oard
ing
Fede
ral-
Boa
rdin
gFe
dera
l- B
oard
ing
Fede
ral-
Boa
rdin
g
1- 8
9-12
7-12
9-12
9-12
NE
W M
EX
ICO
Inst
itute
of
Am
eric
an I
ndia
n A
rts
Sant
e Fe
Fede
ral-
Boa
rdin
g10
-12
OT
HE
R S
TA
TE
S IN
WH
ICH
TH
E T
AR
GE
TPO
PUL
AT
ION
AT
TE
ND
ED
PU
BL
ICSC
HO
OL
S
Ari
zona
Cal
ifor
nia
Col
orad
o
Ken
tuck
yM
inne
sota
Neb
rask
a
Okl
ahom
aT
exas
Uta
hW
yom
ing
APPENDIX BDIRECTORY OF TRIBES ENROLLING MORE THAN 200 MEMBERS 155
TAKEN FROM CENSUS OF TRIBES, 1962
State Tribal Units On Off Total
Oregon Umatilla 591 104 645
Warm Springs 1 3E13 63 1,446
TOTAL 1,924 167 2,091
Washington Colville 1,712 1,321 3,033Lummi 600 60 660
Makah 558 0 558
Muck leshoot 271 35 306
Quinault 574 20 594
Spokane 310 307 617
Swinomish 320 47 367
Tula lip 376 53 429
Yakima 2,837 525 362° , L____
TOTAL 7,558 2,368 9,926
Idaho Couer d'Alene 363 160 523
Fort Hall 1,748 25 1,773Nez Perce 1,268 262 1,530
TOTAL 3,379 447 3,826
Montana Blackfeet 5,304 0 5,804Crow 3,126 400 3,526Flathead 2,881 0 2,881Fort Belknap 1,420 630 2,050Fort Peck 3,056 215 3,271North'n Cheyenne 2,129 0 2,129Rocky Boys 900 0 900
TOTAL
_19,:316 1,245 20,561
156 DIRECTORY OF TRIBES EEROLLING MORE THAN 200 MEMBERSTAKEN FROM CENSUS OF TRIBES, 1962
(Continued)
State Tribal Units On Off Total
North Dakota Fort Berthold 1,815 439 2,254Fort Totten 1,426 50 1,476Standing Rock 2,050 0 2,050Turtle Mountain 2,956 2,754 5,710
TOTAL 8,247 3,243 11,490
South Dakota Cheyenne River 3,734 0 3,734Crow Creek 902 156 1,058Flandreau 46 237 283Lower Brule 428 81 509
Pine Ridge 8,480 300 8,780Rosebud 5,844 1,357 7,201Sisseton 2,173 98 2,271Standing Rock 2,300 0 2,300Yankton 1 490 43 1,533
TOTAL 25,397 2,272 27,669