Date post: | 21-Aug-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | alyssa-nicholas |
View: | 74 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 1
Running head: Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use
Is your impulsive personality causing you to drink more? The mediating
role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use
Alyssa Nicholas
11705334
Supervised by Dr Daria Kuss
Date of submission: May, 2014
Word count: 7,376
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of
Bsc(hons) Psychology of Birmingham City University
AUTHOR DECLARATION
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 2
I, Alyssa Nicholas, declare that the dissertation entitled “Is your impulsive
personality causing you to drink more? The mediating role of impulsivity and drinking
motives on alcohol use” and the work presented in this dissertation are both my own, and
have been generated by me as the result of my own original research.
I confirm that:
1. This work was done wholly while in candidature for a research degree at this University.
2. Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the
exception of such quotations, this dissertation is entirely my own work.
3. I have acknowledged all main sources of help.
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to take the time to thank the following people who have help and
supported me throughout this dissertation.
Firstly I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Daria Kuss for her support and
expert knowledge and time, encouragement and patience.
Secondly I would like to thank Birmingham City University for giving me this
opportunity to expand my knowledge and provide me with great opportunities.
Thirdly, I would like to thank my friends, who have been there to encourage
and motivate me throughout the course, and my university friends who have made my
time at university so enjoyable.
Last but not least I would like to thank my family: my dad, Evan, my nan and
grandad, brother and Milo, but especially my mom for always supporting me and
encouraging me throughout these three years at university and throughout my life, she
is an inspiration to me and I love her lots.
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………….. 1
ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION………………………………………………....….. 2
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................3
A. Prevalence and health risks of alcohol use…………………….……...3
B. Impulsivity…...…………………….………………………………... 4
C. Impulsivity and alcohol use…………………………………….…… 5
D. Drinking motives…………………………………..……………...…..7
E. Impulsivity, drinking motives and alcohol use…………………….... 9
F. Drinking motives, alcohol use and older adults………………..…….10
G. Research hypothesis…………………………..……………………...12
CHAPTER II. METHOD………………………………..…………………………….. 13
A. Participants………………………………………………..………... 13
B. Design and procedure……………………………………..………... 13
C. Measures…………………………………………………..………... 14
1. Alcohol use…………………………………………..
………… 14
2. Impulsive behaviour………………………………….
………... 15
3. Drinking motives……………………………………….
……… 16
D. Statistical analysis……………………...………………….………... 16
CHAPTER III. RESULTS……………………………………………….…………….. 18
A. Descriptive statistics………………………………..………………. 18
B. Test of correlation…………………………………..……...……..… 19
C. Multiple regression………………………………...………………... 19
CHAPTER IV. DISCUSSION………………………………………...………………... 20
REFERENCES………………………………………………………...………………... 28
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 5
APPENDICES…………………………………………………...…………………….... 37
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 6
ABSTRACT
Alcohol use is a growing concern, especially in western societies where
there is a binge drinking culture seen in adolescence, as it can lead to alcohol related
problems later in life. Impulsive behaviours and an individual’s drinking motives have
shown to mediate alcohol consumption in both adolescence and older adults. Method: 72
participants (33% undergraduate students, 64% females, 36% males) aged between 18-73
completed either a paper-and-pencil or an internet based survey consisting of the UPPS-P
impulsive behaviour scale, the drinking motives questionnaire (DMQ) and the daily
drinking questionnaire (DDQ). Results: The majority of the sample drank alcohol at least
once a month (91%). A multiple regression analysis found coping and enhancement
motives to be statistically significant predictors of alcohol consumption. A positive
correlation was found between coping (p<.0005) and social motives (p<.0005) and
impulsivity. Conclusion: Coping and enhancement drinking motives were shown to be
mediators of alcohol consumption in a communal sample, addressing the gap in the
literature which tends to focus on adolescences. The results also demonstrate the
importance of tailoring interventions to an individual’s specific need. Limitations and
future research are reported in the discussion.
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 7
Is your impulsive personality causing you to drink more? The mediating role
of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use
Alcohol is one of the world’s most commonly used drugs and alcohol misuse is
very evident in western cultures. It has been reported that alcohol consumption in the UK
has almost doubled since 1961 (WHO, 2011). Alcohol misuse is important as it can have
significant psychological, social and physical health consequences as alcohol has been
found to be a mediator in 60 different types of diseases, is the result of 2.5 million global
deaths per year and around 15,000 deaths per year in the UK (United Kingdom
Department of Health, 2013;WHO, 2013). In 2010 to 2011 it was reported that 1.2 million
individuals in the UK were admitted to hospital due to alcohol-related consequences
(United Kingdom Department of Health, 2013). Therefore it is important to investigate
what motivates people to drink alcohol and examine if personality traits, such as impulse
control, influences alcohol consumption. Extending the research into alcohol use, drinking
motives and impulsivity provides additional data, knowledge and understanding of the
cause and effect of alcohol use which can help to reduce alcohol-related problems and
improve interventions.
Alcohol use can have significant implications on all aspects of an individual’s life.
For example, when alcohol use was measured during high school through to the first year
of university, research showed alcohol use in students had negative academic
consequences, and this association was stronger with those who drank on a weekly basis
(Romosz & Quigley, 2013). Research also suggests that adolescents who scored lower in
attention and executive functioning tests tended to drink alcohol and show alcohol
dependent symptoms eight years later (Tapert, Baratta, Abrantes & Brown, 2002). Using
MRI scans and behavioural assessments, research suggests that alcohol misuse may cause
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 8
neurodevelopment problems in the frontal lobe, cerebral cortex and cingulate cortex. These
different areas of the brain play roles in memory, attention, motivation, perceptual
awareness, language, consciousness, automatic functions and rational cognitive functions
(Luciana, Collins, Muetzel & Lim, 2013; Silveri, 2012). This may explain the reason why
intoxicated individuals demonstrate an observed decrease in most of these aspects, for
example, slurring of words, lack of cognitive control, loss of memory, decrease in
perceptual awareness and behavioural adjustments (Bartholow, Henry, Lust, Saults &
Wood, 2012).
These psychological, social and physiological risks are the reasons why it is
important to investigate alcohol use in conjunction with factors influencing some
individuals to drink more than others. This study focuses on the importance of impulsive
behaviour and drinking motives on influencing an individual’s alcohol use. Little research
into alcohol use and personality has centred on drinking motives and specifically
impulsivity as being a significant factor in mediating alcohol use (Adams, Kaiser, Lynam,
Charnigo & Milich, 2012).
Impulsive behaviour is central to human cognition as it is a spontaneous reaction to
stimuli, both external and internal, that is incompatible with an individual’s long term
goals, as it is acted out without any thought, control or regard for negative consequences
(Stahl et al., 2013). Impulsivity can also be described as failing to resist a sudden urge that
can potentially harm the self or others; this is when being too impulsive can cause
psychiatric disorders including alcohol use or misuse (Dick et al., 2010). However it is
argued, that there is no specific definition for impulsivity as it is a multifactorial construct,
therefore identifying and measuring different constructs of impulsive behaviour is difficult
as there is not one unanimous definition of impulsivity (Sharma, Markon & Clark, 2013).
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 9
Whiteside and Lynam (2001) constructed a four factor model of impulsivity:
Urgency, (lack of) Premeditation, (lack of) Perseverance and Sensation Seeking (UPPS).
The first factor, urgency, is the tendency to act on strong impulses usually in response to
distress. Individuals who score highly on urgency are likely to engage in impulsive
behaviours to alleviate distressing and negative emotions. The second factor, (lack of)
premeditation, is the tendency to act without thinking of the negative consequences. The
third factor, (lack of) perseverance, is the tendency to lose concentration easily and give up
on tasks and/or get distracted by external stimuli. The final factor, sensation seeking is the
tendency to seek out new, exciting and potentially dangerous experiences. Cyders et al.
(2007) proposed a fifth factor of impulsivity, positive urgency to explain risky behaviours
acted out spontaneously due to an extremely positive mood. These five factors make up the
UPPS-P impulsive behaviour scale questionnaire. Cyders (2013) measured the UPPS-P
scales variance across sexes and validated the UPPS-P scale functions across males and
females. The five facets of impulsivity are individually associated with mediating alcohol
use, alcohol-related problems and individual drinking motives (Curcio & George, 2011).
Ibanez, Ruiperez, Villa, Moya and Ortet (2008) found a strong relationship
between impulsive behaviour and alcohol use and misuse in adolescents and adults.
Unplanned drinking and individuals with a lack of impulse control have shown to mediate
alcohol use, alcohol-related problems and negative urgency (Pearson & Henson, 2013). A
meta-analysis of the five factor model of impulsivity (UPPS-P) and alcohol use by Stautz
and Cooper (2013) found positive and negative urgency to have the largest association
with problematic drinking, sensation seeking and positive urgency to have the largest
association with alcohol consumption, and sensation seeking to have the largest
association with binge drinking. A positive association was found with all impulsive traits
and alcohol consumption in an adolescent sample. Other research found individuals who
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 10
scored highly in both negative and positive urgency were more strongly associated to
alcohol use than those who scored low in both urgency facets of impulsivity (Burton,
Pedersen & McCarthy, 2012). This was supported by Coskunpinar, Dir and Cyders (2013)
who also found positive and negative urgency to be strongly associated with alcohol
dependency.
Research conducted on rats found that those treated with alcohol were more likely
to choose a bridge that resulted in a small but immediate reward compared to rats that were
treated with an isocaloric solution (control group), who were more likely to choose a safer
but longer route (Juarez, Munoz-Villegas, Guerrero-Alvarez & Flores-Ocamp, 2013). The
rats treated with alcohol showed an increase in motor and cognitive impulsivity activation
in the brain and were less capable of waiting for a permissive stimulus, demonstrating
poorer attention span. This study suggests that alcohol may affect impulsivity more than
attention span, and shows an association between alcohol use and immediate rewards.
Similar observations were shown in another study, which additionally observed rats
that had been injected with alcohol, after demonstrating impulsive behaviour, would
voluntarily intake alcohol to reactivate the impulsive behaviour, demonstrating
uncontrollable drinking behaviour (Poulos, Parker & Lê, D, 1998). Adolescent rats were
also found to exhibit greater levels of impulsivity, in the form of novelty-seeking
behaviour and risk-taking, compared to adults across age and gender (Doremus-Fitzwater,
Barreto & Spear, 2012). Due to impulsivity being observed in both male and female rats,
this study suggests impulsivity is a general feature of adolescence. This explains the risk-
taking and novelty-seeking behaviour associated with alcohol use that is seen in
adolescence. The generalization of the results from these studies however, is limited to
humans as they were conducted on rats, although it does provide significant empirical
research.
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 11
However, some research has found no statistical significance between impulsivity
and alcohol use and suggest individuals with heightened alcohol use have higher levels of
alcohol related problems, as would be expected, but tend to be sensation seekers instead of
having a lack of impulsive control (Magid, MacLean & Colder, 2007). However Magid et
al., (2007) found that although sensation seekers consumed more alcohol, they tended to
be more organised than those who scored highly on impulsivity, for example planning a
way home and avoiding the tendency to be careless and disregard negative consequences.
Additional research found impulsivity and sensation seeking and alcohol use to be
mediated by an individual’s perceived typical pattern of drinking behaviour (Hustad,
Pearson, Neighbors & Borsari, 2014). In general, research tends to find impulsivity to be
associated to alcohol use, however the effect sizes across the different studies has varied
significantly (from -0.05 to 1.02) (Coskunpinar et al., 2013) this could be due to
impulsivities diverse characteristics and broad concept (Stahl et al., 2013).
Although research suggests there is an association between an individual’s
impulsivity and alcohol consumption, further motives for drinking have also been studied.
Cooper, Russell, Skinner and Windle (1992) constructed three drinking motives: Social,
enhancement and coping motives, and later Cooper (1994) added conformity. Cooper et al.
(1992) found that enhancement motives were the strongest predictor of quantity and
frequency of alcohol use and of frequency of drinking to intoxication. This suggested that
individuals who drink for enhancement motives are predicted to be heavier drinkers
compared to those who have coping or social motives to drink. Additionally Cooper et al.
(1992) proposed that individuals who drink to enhance positive emotions, rather than
negative, retained greater personal control over the quantity they drank and on deciding
when and under what circumstances it is most appropriate to drink heavily. Read, Wood,
Kahler, Maddock and Palfai (2003) used Cooper et al.’s (1994) drinking motives in
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 12
relation to alcohol use and alcohol related problems in students. The data supported that
drinking motives contribute to an individual’s alcohol use and alcohol-related problems,
however drinking motives are not consistently central as the role of social influence and
positive reinforcement motives were shown to be important factors in alcohol use and
alcohol-related problems.
In addition, a study using a clinical sample found that enhancement motives
significantly predicted alcohol consumption for both males and females, however coping
motives only significantly predicted alcohol consumption for women (Lehavot,
Stappenebck, Luterek, Kaysen & Simpson, 2014). This suggest that drinking motives may
be gender specific, therefore an intervention that targeted enhancement motives is likely to
reduce alcohol consumption for both males and females, whereas an intervention that
targeted coping motives would only reduce alcohol consumption for women. Additional
research focusing on males found traditional masculine ideologies, based on cultural and
social norms, were associated with a gender role conflict of how males believe they should
behave, for example the more a man can drink, the more masculine he is perceived (Uy,
Massoth & Gottdiener, 2013). Coping and enhancement motives were found to be
associated with the relationship between gender role conflict and alcohol-related problems,
whereas coping motives were found to be associated with the relationship between gender
role conflict and alcohol consumption (Uy et al., 2013). This research may explain why
males are reported to drink greater levels of alcohol compared to females in the majority of
the literature around alcohol use in both adolescent and older adult samples (Cooper, 1992;
Gilson, 2013).
From a behavioural perspective, the negative consequences of consuming too
much alcohol, the ‘hangover’, should punish the individual and through operant
conditioning the individual should learn from the negative consequences, change their
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 13
behaviour and reduce alcohol intake (Read, Wardell & Bachrach, 2013). However,
research comparing alcohol consumption of college students against negative
consequences from first year of college to second, found negative consequences to
increase alcohol intake (Read et al., 2013). This suggests drinking motivates combines
with the effects and advantages of drinking alcohol, such as increasing a person’s
confidence, far outweighs the negative consequences. This was a longitude study
comprising of college students and it could be argued that the increase in alcohol
consumption was due to more stress in the second year. Therefore it is important to
investigate what the underlying motives are for drinking.
Research into coping motives of drinking and impulsive behaviour found coping
motives to be a predictor of urgent impulsive behaviours due to negative emotions,
suggesting that highly emotional impulsive individuals are more likely to use alcohol as a
way to cope with anxiety when they are experiencing tension or worries (Mezquita,
stewart & Ruipérez, 2010). Cludiud, Stevens, Bantin, Gerlach and Hermann (2013)
supported this finding as they found individuals who drink to cope and for social motives
are associated with habitual and hazardous alcohol use due to social anxiety and worries.
Mezquita et al. (2010) also suggests that individuals with enhancement motives for
drinking are more carefree and use alcohol to fulfil their needs for stimulation and exciting
interpersonal interactions. Furthermore individuals who have enhancement motives to
drink were predicted to have a lack of perseverance (Theakston, Stewart, Dawson,
Knowlden-Loewen & Lehman, 2004). Individuals who lack premeditation are seen to
drink for enhancement motives, and tended to drink wine or spirits and engage in risky
behaviour (Jones, Chryssanthakis & Groom, 2014).
Adam et al. (2012) suggest that an individual’s impulsive behaviour is seen to be
the most reliable predictor of measuring problematic alcohol use and that sensation
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 14
seeking and lack of premeditation demonstrated a direct effect on problematic drinking,
and an indirect effect through enhancement motives. Adam et al. (2012) support previous
research using the UPPS impulsive behaviour scale and the Drinking Motives
Questionnaires (DMQ) and also found negative urgency was associated with coping and
enhancement motives. Jones, Chryssanthakis and Groom (2013) using the same surveys
supported Adam et al.’s (2012) findings that negative urgency was associated with
conformity and coping and social motives. Jones et al. (2013) found that the majority of
their sample (94.5%), consisting of adolescent students aged 18-25 years drank alcohol at
least monthly.
The majority of research focuses on alcohol use and drinking motives of
adolescents and young adults, however there is little understanding of older adult’s alcohol
use and motives for drinking. Gilson, Bryant, Bei, Komiti, Jackson and Judd (2013) found
that in older adults the most significant reason for drinking was for social motives
followed by enhancement and coping motives. This suggests that older adults tend to drink
more in social situations and at social occasions, rather than for euphoric and coping
reasons. Those that drank for coping motives were shown to have a direct association with
problematic drinking. Furthermore the research suggests that enhancement motives do not
predict heavier drinking as found in research with adolescence (Cooper et al. 1992).
However research using older adults sample has found an association between social and
enhancement motives and frequency of alcohol use which is also found in research using
an adolescent sample (Gilson et al., 2013). However, the sample was predominately
women therefore the results are not representative of the general population.
An additional study on older adults in retirement communities found similar results
in younger adult results. The results indicated that older adults drink to cope with
problems, to be more sociable, and drink in order to enhance their mental state and for
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 15
salutary reasons (Bolger, 2000). However unlike research using an adolescent sample,
enhancement motives did not predict heavier drinking, but moderate to light drinking, and
coping motives were still predictor of problematic drinking. However this may be due to
the fact that heavier drinking/binge drinking is not seen as much in older adults as it is in
adolescences as in a sample of 16,785 older adults (age 65 years or above) 95% reported
drinking none or less than 2 standard drinks (10g) per day (Tait, French, Burns, Byles &
Anstey, 2013). It is important to research older adult drinking as most older adults take
medication for various reasons and the combination of medication and alcohol use may be
putting older adults at physical and mental health risk as alcohol can interfere with the
effectiveness of their medication (Moore, Whiteman & Ward, 2007).
Research is uncertain whether individuals’ drinking motives cause them to be
impulsive or whether their impulsive personality influences their drinking motives and the
quantity of alcohol consumed (Jones et al., 2013). Amlung, Few, Howland, Rohsenow,
Metrik and MacKillop (2013) used the UPPS-P impulsive behaviour scale and measured
the frequency of caffeinated alcoholic beverages (CABs) consumed by undergraduate
students. A significantly higher association in frequency of CABs consumed and
impulsivity scores were found for men compared to women.
Dunne, Freedlander, Coleman and Katz (2013) suggest the impulsivity of an
individual is a stronger predictor of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems
than other expectancies or evaluations. Additional research on individuals with alcohol
related disorders from the ages 18 to 68 in a follow up study 16 years after treatment, with
either alcoholics anonymous or a professional psychological, found the decrease of
impulsive traits was associated with the reduction or diminish of alcohol use for both men
and women (Blonigen, Timko, Moos & Moos, 2009). Littlefield, Sher & Wood (2010)
suggested that as people get older they mature out of typical adolescent drinking patterns
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 16
and their drinking motives change, typically to coping motives, and less impulsive traits
are reported, which in turn would suggest the individual matures out of their problematic
alcohol use. However older adults may still demonstrate alcohol-related problems and
report the same motives for drinking as adolescents (Gilson, 2013). Although impulsive
behaviour is rarely measured in older adults, this is most probably due to older adults
being less able to demonstrate impulsive behaviour due to physiological incapability’s. It
is therefore important to research older adults drinking motives as well as young adults, so
that we are able to expand the knowledge of drinking motives, alcohol use and impulsivity
for a diverse and broader age group. It is essential that studies are tailored to understand
alcohol use in older adults, as well as young adults, so that we are able to make
interventions and thereby reduce alcohol consumption and promote healthier lives both
physiologically and psychologically (Magid, MacLean & Colder, 2007).
The present study therefore will examine in a communal sample, whether highly
impulsive individuals are more likely to report enhancement and social motives for
drinking, and report higher levels of alcohol use than individuals who are less impulsive
and drink to cope. The present study will contribute to the current literature that is lacking
research into drinking motives, alcohol use and impulsive behaviours. The majority of the
current literature in the subject focuses on college and undergraduate students as they are
an easily accessible group and are seen to have more hazardous alcohol habits (i.e. binge
drinking) however it is important to have a broader understanding and knowledge of a
more diverse age group, therefore the purpose of this study is to provide more
comprehensive results by using a broader age range and diverse communal participants.
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 17
METHOD
Participants
A total of 72 participants, 46 females and 26 males, aged 18-73 (M =33, SD =
16.04) with 54% aged 18-25, and approximately 33% undergraduate students were
recruited for the present study. Participants were recruited via Birmingham City University
by directly approaching people on the campus. Participants were also recruited at a coffee
shop in the town centre of Wolverhampton through direct approach and allowing
completion of the questionnaire (see Appendix A) at that given time. If participants did not
have time to fill out the questionnaire at that moment, they were given a link to an online
survey (designed through http://freeonlinesurveys.com) to complete in their own time.
Participants were asked to state their age, gender and occupation. A participant’s
involvement in completion of the questionnaires was completely voluntary and unpaid.
Ethical approval was granted by Birmingham City University School of Social Sciences
ethics committee (see Appendix B). Confidentiality issues were resolved by producing an
online link to an internet based survey instead of sending questionnaires through email to
assure the participants that their data would be anonymous and confidential.
Design and Procedure
A within-group design was used to examine whether highly impulsive individuals
were more likely to report enhancement and social motives for drinking, and report higher
levels of alcohol use than individuals who are less impulsive and drink to cope.
Participants were asked if they would like to participate in research concerning alcohol
use. Participants who accepted were given an information sheet to read (see Appendix C)
to inform them of the purpose of the research and their ethical rights in participating. After
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 18
reading through the information sheet the participant was given a consent form (see
Appendix D) and asked to tick the appropriate boxes, name, and date, and sign it.
Once these steps were complete the individual was given the questionnaire to fill
out in private and asked not to discuss the questions with anyone around them. After
completion of the questionnaire the individual was a debrief sheet (see Appendix E) which
included the researchers email if they were interested in knowing the results of the
research or if they had any questions about the research, and contact details for alcohol
awareness and help website. Participants who filled out the questionnaire online were
given the same relevant information from the information sheet and told that by
completing this questionnaire they are giving consent for their data to be used, and they
understand their ethical rights to withdraw at any time and that their information will be
anonymous. The researchers contact details were also provided if the participant wished to
withdraw their data after completion.
Measures
Alcohol use. Alcohol consumption was measured using the Daily Drinking
Questionnaire (DDQ) (Collins, Parks & Marlatt, 1985). The DDQ measures a typical
weeks drinking and a heavy weeks drinking in the last 30 days. Participants reported the
typical number of drinks and number of hours spent drinking on a typical week that is
averaged over30 days. Participants were given a Standard Drink Conversion in order to
standardize drink size. Participants were also asked how often they drank during the last
month, on a typical weekend (Friday or Saturday) and how much they drank at an occasion
in the last month. Variables derived from this measure include typical weekly frequency of
drinking (i.e. counting the number of days with 1 or more drinks), typical weekly quantity
(i.e. total number of drinks across the 7 days), and typical weekly frequency of binge
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 19
drinking (i.e., number of days with 4/5 or more drinks). In the original study by Collins,
Parks and Marlatt (1985) the DDQ demonstrated reliability with α ranging between .66
and .75. The current study demonstrated α of .80 (See Appendix F for Cronbach’s alpha’s
for all questionnaires and subscales).
Impulsive behaviour. Impulsive behaviour was measured using the UPPS-P
Impulsive Behaviour Scales which included 45-items of Whiteside and Lynam’s (2001)
UPPS Impulsive Behaviour Scale and 14-items of Cyders et al. (2007) Positive Urgency
Scale, which calculated to 59 self-reported items all together. The UPPS-P survey is based
on a model of impulsivity which measure 5 subscales of impulsivity: (Negative) Urgency
(12 items), (Lack of) Premeditation (11 items), (Lack of) Perseverance (10 items),
Sensation-seeking (12 items) and Positive urgency (14 items). Each item is rated on a 4-
point Likert scale, 1= Agree Strongly, 2= Agree some, 3= Disagree some and 4= Disagree
strongly. Examples of questions from the UPPS-P include “I have trouble controlling my
impulses” ((negative) Urgency), “I don’t like to start a project until I know exactly how to
proceed” ((lack of) Premeditation), “Sometimes there are so many little things to be done
that I just ignore them all” ((lack of) Perseverance), “I would enjoy fast driving”
(Sensation-Seeking) and “I am surprised at the things I do while in a great mood” (Positive
Urgency).
Individuals who score high on urgency and sensation-seeking and low on urgency
and perseverance are characterized to be highly impulsive. The scores for each subscale
are calculated by the mean response across all the relevant items, after reversing the scores
for specific items. The original study (Whiteside & Lynam, 2001) shows the UPPS
subscales to have good internal consistency were α ranged from .82 to .91 and in the
present study were α ranged from .84 to .88. Cyders et al. (2007) showed positive urgency
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 20
demonstrated good reliability were α ranged from .70 (with student participants) to .95
(with alcoholic and eating-disorder participants). The present study for positive urgency
demonstrated good reliability were α was .95. The UPPS-P in the current study
demonstrated an overall α of .95.
Drinking Motives. Drinking motives were measured using the Drinking Motives
Questionnaire-Revised (DMQ) (Cooper, 1994). The DMQ is made up of 20 items with 5
subscales: social motives, coping motives, enhancement motives and conformity and these
motives are measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = almost never/never to 5 =
almost always/always. Examples for drinking motives include “because it helps you enjoy
a party” (social motive), “to forget your worries” (coping motive), “because it gives you a
pleasant feeling” (enhancement motive) and “to fit in with a group you like” (conformity).
The original study shows the DMQ to have good structure and criterion validity and high
reliability with an α ranged from .94 for social motives, .93 for coping motives, .89 for
enhancement motives and .89 for conformity (Cooper, 1994). The present study α ranged
from .86 for social motives, .84 for coping motives, .90 for enhancement motives and .83
for conformity with an overall α of .92.
Statistical analysis
The quantity of alcohol consumption was calculated in the whole sample (N=72)
using SPSS statistic 21 by calculating the mean typical drinking week and mean heaviest
week drinking in the last 30 days. An overall mean for alcohol consumption was then
produced by finding the mean of these two variables and typical amount of drink
consumed on a weekend (Friday and Saturday). This produced a good overall indication of
the quantity of alcohol consumption over the last 30 days to produce the dependent
variable. Previous research has used drinks per typical drinking week and drinks per
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 21
typical heaviest drinking week independently (Kivlahan, Marlatt, Fromme, Coppel &
Williams, 1990) however this method produced lower Cronbach’s Alpha. Cronbach’s
Alpha for the present study just incorporating drinkers per typical drinking week produced
a Cronbach’s Alpha of .68, compared to the method developed in the present study which
produced a Cronbach’s Alpha of .80. The presence of outliers was assessed using a
boxplot (see appendix G). The outliers from participants 49 and 60 were adjusted through
changing the score by adding two standard deviations to the mean alcohol consumption
(Field, 2009).
Impulsivity level was calculated by computing the mean of each facet of
impulsivity in the UPPS-P model; negative urgency, (lack of) premeditation, (lack of)
perseverance, sensation seeking and positive urgency. A mean for each subscale from the
DMQ (social, coping, enhancement, conformity) was calculated. The primary aim was to
examine alcohol consumption against impulsivity, social, coping, enhancement and
conformity drinking motives using a multiple regression analysis. Interactions between
impulsivity and the four subscales of drinking motives were additionally calculated by
multiplying the mean impulsivity score with the independent mean drinking motives. A
second multiple regression analysis was conducted including the main variables; drinking
motives, impulsivity and alcohol consumption, which further included the interactions
produced between impulsivity and the different drinking motives. Pearson’s test of
correlation was conducted alongside the multiple regression analysis to measure the degree
of relationship between all variables to produce a measure of strength and direction of the
relationship between the different variables (Field, 2009).
The parametric assumptions for the data were tested. Using histograms (see
Appendix H) the data showed to be normally distributed, although alcohol consumption
was skewed to the left slightly. Normal distribution was further tested using test of
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 22
normality and alcohol consumption showed to violate parametric assumptions (see
Appendix I). Homogeneity of variance was tested using Levene’s test (see Appendix J)
homogeneity of variance was violated. As some parametric assumptions were violated this
indicates that conclusions are able to be drawn from the data, but the conclusions cannot
be generalized beyond the present sample (Field, 2009).
RESULTS
Descriptive statistics
Table 1 (see Appendix K) shows the mean and standard deviations for all the
variables in the model. The mean alcohol consumption for women was 2.60 drinks
(SD=2.26) and for men was 2.80 drinks (SD=2.60). There was not a substantial variability
in the quantity of alcohol consumption between males and females. Out of the sample 91%
drank alcohol at least once a month and 43% reported drinking alcohol once or twice a
week. Men scored higher on average for impulsivity (M=2.29, SD=.61) compared to
women (M=2.17, SD=.40). Males average score was higher on all drinking motives
compared to women except for coping motives (see appendix K). Social drinking motives
were the highest scored out of all the drinking motive variables in the sample (M=2.93,
SD=1.06). Conformity drinking motives was the lowest scored out of all the drinking
motive variables in the sample (M=1.46, SD=.71). A one-way ANOVA showed a
statistical significant interacting effect between age and coping motives (F(18,53) = 1.86,
p<.05) and age and conformity drinking motives (F(12,59)=2.02, p<.05). No significant
interaction was shown between gender and drinking motives or impulsivity.
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 23
Test of correlations
To determine the degree to which relationships between impulsivity, drinking
motives and alcohol use correlate with each other Pearson’s test of correlation was
conducted alongside the multiple regression analysis. A positive correlation between
coping drinking motives and impulsivity (r=.512, N=72, p<.0005) and social drinking
motives and impulsivity (r=.472, N=72, p<.0005, one-tailed) was found. A fairly moderate
correlation between coping motives and impulsivity explained 26.2% of the variance and
22.3% of the variance between social drinking motives and impulsivity. A positive
correlation was also found between social drinking motives and enhancement drinking
motives (r=.750, N=72, p<.0005) which explained 56.3% of the variance. Furthermore a
positive correlation between enhancement drinking motives and coping drinking motives
(r=.595, N=72, p<.0005) was found which explained 35.4% of the variance.
Effects of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol consumption
A multiple regression analysis was conducted where alcohol consumption was
entered as the dependent variable, and impulsivity, social drinking motives, coping
drinking motives, enhancement drinking motives and conformity drinking motives were
the predictors. The enter method was used and a significant model emerged (F(5,66) =
7.027, p<.0005). Model 1 (Appendix L) explains 29.8% of the variance (Adjusted R²
=.298). Table 2 (See Appendix M) gives information for the predictor variables entered
into the model. Coping drinking motives (t(66)=2.22, p=.03) and enhancement drinking
motives (t(66)=3.00, p=.004) were all significant predictors of alcohol consumption.
Impulsivity, social drinking motives and conformity drinking motives were not significant
predictors of alcohol consumption. A second multiple regression analysis was conducted
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 24
which included interactions between the subscales of drinking motives and impulsivity, no
statistically significant predictors of alcohol consumption were shown.
DISCUSSION
This study attempted to measure the relationship between impulsivity, drinking
motives (social, coping, enhancement and conformity motives) and the quantity of alcohol
consumed in a typical week. The present study addressed the gap in literature which
tended to focus on adolescent students by using a communal sample made up of only 33%
students, with an age ranging from 18-73 years old. The results showed that coping and
enhancement drinking motives were statistically significant predictors of alcohol
consumption, but social and conformity motives were not. The results supported previous
research that found enhancement and coping motives to be a predictor of alcohol
consumption in elderly adults (Bolger, 2000) and adolescents (Adam, 2012). Although the
results conflict with other studies that suggested social motives to be a predictor of alcohol
consumption in adolescent sample (Jones, 2013) and elderly sample (Gilson, 2013) and
have found enhancement motives to not be a significant predictor of alcohol consumption
(Cludiud, 2013). In general, the research tends to show enhancement, coping and social
motives to be predictors of alcohol consumption, however the literature still varies in
results suggesting more research needs to be conducted to provide more robust results.
Impulsivity was not found to be a predictor of alcohol consumption in the present
study, although this does support some previous research (Magid et al., 2007), the majority
of the research does tend to find an association between impulsivity and alcohol
consumption, although effect sizes across studies has been found to vary significantly
(Coskunpinar et al., 2013). One point to take into consideration is that the present study
investigated impulsivity as a whole concept and not in regards to its five different facets.
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 25
This was purposely done due to the small sample size (N=72) of the present study as when
using multiple regression analysis, the smaller the sample size the greater the chance
random data can show a stronger effect (Field, 2009). The chance of this happening is
increased as the variables increase, therefore impulsivity was examined as a whole concept
to decrease the variables from ten to six, and decrease the chance of random data showing
a strong effect.
Although previous research has measured impulsivity as a whole concept (Ibáñez
et al., 2008) -other research argues that this raises problems in the results as impulsivity is
too much of a broad concept with diverse characteristics (Stahl, 2013). This is shown in
the literature as a meta-analysis found lack of perseverance to be the strongest predictor of
alcohol consumption and positive and negative urgency to be the strongest predictor of
problematic drinking (Coskunpinar et al., 2013). Other studies suggest sensation seeking
and positive urgency to be the strongest predictors of alcohol consumption and support that
both negative and positive urgency are the strongest predictors of problematic drinking
(Stautz et al., 2013). This suggests that there are different outcomes of alcohol
consumption for the different facets of impulsivity therefore future research should
examine impulsivity in its different facets and not as a whole concept when investigating
drinking motives and alcohol consumption.
Furthermore previous research which examined the different facets of impulsivity
and drinking motives found specific drinking motives to be associated with specific facets
of impulsivity. For example negative urgency was shown to be associated with coping
drinking motives (Mezquita, 2010) and negative urgency was also shown to be associated
with coping and enhancement motives (Adam, 2012) and social and conformity drinking
motives (Jones, 2013). Sensation seeking and lack of perseverance have shown to be most
strongly associated with enhancement motives (Mezquita, 2010; Theakston et al., 2004).
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 26
This suggests that future research should focus on examining the different facets of
impulsivity with drinking motives and alcohol consumption as literature shows there is
different relationships between these variables.
The present study found a slight increase in alcohol consumption for males
compared to females but a substantial variance was not found. The results slightly support
previous research that found males tended to drink more alcohol than females in both older
adults (Gilson, 2013) and adolescents (Cooper, 1992; Read et al., 2013). A substantial
variance may not have been seen in the present study due to the small sample size and that
the sample was made up of predominately females, meaning a true comparison could not
be made. Although the present study looked at a communal sample with a diverse range of
age and occupation, which addressed the gap from previous research that tended to focus
on undergraduate adolescent students (Adams et al., 2012), a communal sample was harder
to recruit compared to an undergraduate student sample and the results were difficult to
compare to previous research due to the lack of communal sample studies. Furthermore
using a communal sample may have also been responsible for the violation of
homogeneity of variance as adolescents tend to go out more and are involved in more
social and binge drinking activities (Adam et al., 2012) compared to older adults who tend
to drink less and for coping and salutary reasons (Bolger, 2000).
Correlations were conducted in order to examine the relationships between
impulsivity, drinking motives and alcohol use. A positive correlation was found between
coping drinking motives and impulsivity and social drinking motives and impulsivity.
Although this does support previous research (Cludiud et al., 2013; Mezquita et al., 2010)
it lacks specificity in impulsivity as explained previously impulsivity has diverse
characteristics therefore we would not expect an individual who drinks for coping reasons
to score highly in sensation seeking as research has shown individuals tend to drink to
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 27
cope with anxiety and worries (Mezquita et al., 2010). Furthermore contradictory to coping
drinking motives, individuals who score highly in social motives tend to score highly in
sensation seeking (Jones et al., 2013). Therefore we cannot take the present study’s results
too seriously as using impulsivity alone is too much of a general and broad concept (Stahl
et al., 2013). Furthermore it should be noted that correlation does not suggest causation,
therefore there could be many other variables which can explain the correlation between
alcohol consumption and coping and social drinking motives (Field, 2009).
Additional variables that could influence the results are the impact of socio-
economic status (SES) and the type of drinks consumed. Huckle, You and Casswell (2010)
found a relationship between SES and drinking patterns as individuals with low to average
SES tended to drink greater quantities of alcohol. Research has also shown that the type of
drinks individuals consume can mediate impulsivity and drinking motives as Jones et al.,
(2013) found wine and spirit drinkers were associated with lack of premeditation and
enhancement drinking motives (Jones et al., 2013). Furthermore caffeinated alcohol
beverages (CABs) were found to be associated with higher impulsivity and hazardous
alcohol use (Amlung et al., 2013).
The retrospective self-report surveys used in the present study was cheap to
produce and easy to retain data from. However the self-report survey may have exposed
inaccuracies in the results as it can be influenced by social desirability. In particular, social
desirability observed when measuring alcohol consumption. The higher number of drinks
an individual reports the more socially undesirable they see themselves, which may cause
them to alter or under-estimate their response (Zaldívar, Molina, López Ríos & García
Montes, 2009). Zaldivar et al., (2009) also compared direct and indirect (nonobvious) self-
report scales of alcohol consumption and found scales indicated a positive and statistically
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 28
significant correlation- thus, supporting the DDQ approach to using direct questions about
alcohol consumption.
Other research has shown individuals who attempt to influence the perception of
their image to others reported 20-33% less alcohol consumption and were 50% less likely
to report hazardous drinking (Davis, Thake and Vilhena, 2010), suggesting that individuals
with high self-presentation may lead to a bias in the results which may under-estimate
alcohol consumption. It is further suggested that individuals who overestimate other
peoples alcohol consumption tend to drink more than individuals who underestimate or
correctly guess others alcohol consumption (Bertholet, Gaume, faouzi, daeppen & Gmel,
2011). Those individuals who overestimated others alcohol consumption also tended to
underestimate their own, suggesting individuals with a cognitive distortion about others
drinking may self-report their own drinking inaccurately.
Further influential factors that should be considered is an individual’s frame of
mind filling out the survey, as their mood may affect their attitude towards drinking.
Research has shown that more emotionally involved drinkers fabricate different outcomes
for their expectation of mood, depending on their actual pre-drinking mood, compared to
less involved drinkers (Merrill, Wardell, & Read, 2009). This research suggests that when
reporting alcohol consumption, an individual’s expectations of their mood, associated with
drinking, can cause inaccurate self-reporting. It has also been suggested that impulsivity is
regulated by an individual’s mood at the moment they’re completing the survey, memories
of their last experience drinking or their overall mood about their life at that point may
influence their responses (Cyder et al., 2007), suggesting mood regulation may be taken
into consideration for future research.
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 29
Additionally poor memory and an individual’s current drinking pattern can cause
inaccurate self-report of alcohol consumption as individuals do not typically note how
many drinks they consume on a night out (Collins et al., 1985; Stockwell et al., 2004).
Additionally questions used in the DDQ reporting ‘standard drinks’ in the last 30 days has
shown to produce underestimated alcohol consumption, whereas recent recall surveys have
shown to produce more accurate alcohol consumption compared to retrospective surveys
(Stockwell et al., 2004). Therefore future research may benefit from incorporating an
online web diary where alcohol consumption and mood is reported daily, or multiple times
a day, to produce more consistent and accurate drinking patterns and specific drinking
motives controlled by mood (Mohr et al., 2005).
The present study incorporated both paper-and-pencil and internet based survey
method of collecting data. The internet based survey allowed participants to be easily
recruited as those who did not have time to fill out the paper-and-pencil survey, at the
specific time of being approached, were able to use a link to complete an online survey in
their own time. Research comparing paper-and-pencil and internet based data collection
methods found both methods to be equivalent in internal consistency, intercorrelations and
comfort of completing the questionnaire, with nonequivalence seen in only some aspects
of auxiliary equivalence, i.e. completion time and missing data (Weigold, Weigold &
Russell, 2013). Internet based surveys also make recruitment easier as the 21st century is a
generation of portable technology, therefore people are able to access surveys on
smartphones or tablets and complete them whilst on the go. Research found no
considerable difference between data collection using a smartphone/tablet compared to
data collected on a home-computer (De Bruijne & Wijnant, 2013). However, consideration
should be taken of the fact that internet based surveys are not completed in a control
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 30
environment therefore external factors may distract participants and cause them to miss
questions or incorrectly report data.
Future research would benefit from conducting longitudinal studies as there is a
lack of this study methodology in the literature analysing drinking motives, impulsivity
and alcohol consumption (Cyder et al., 2007). Longitudinal studies are important as
Littlefield et al., (2010) suggests individuals mature out of problematic drinking as their
drinking motives change, specifically coping motives, as impulsivity decreases from
adolescence to adulthood. Rather, more research using longitudinal studies will be
beneficial as alcohol consumption in adolescence has shown to be associated with
problematic drinking in later life and interventions for adolescents has shown to decrease
alcohol consumption (Armitage, Rowe, Arden & Harris, 2014). Therefore it would be
useful to investigate: 1) if interventions for adolescences prevent alcohol-related problem
later in life, and 2) if binge drinking in adolescence is just a phase of an individual’s life
that they grow or mature out of.
A lack of research is also seen in literature focusing on elderly adults in respects of
impulsivity, drinking motives and alcohol consumption, even though research has shown
older adults to have problematic drinking (Gilson et al., 2013), which may be harmful to
both their physical and mental health as alcohol may interact and interfere with the
effectiveness of their medication (Moore et al., 2007). Therefore future research may want
to focus not only on young adults and adolescences but also on producing more data for
analysis of elderly adults to target interventions that will help in recovery.
Future research may also benefit from incorporating a behavioural observation of
impulsivity traits in order to produce a mixed method approach to measure impulsivity
accurately (Magid & Colder, 2007). It may also be useful to look at binge drinking
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 31
influences on drinking motives and impulsivity as research suggests those who drink for
coping, social and enhancement motives are more likely to engage in binge drinking
(Cludius et al., 2013; Cooper et al., 1992).
In conclusion, impulsivity has been strongly associated with alcohol use in
adolescents and adults (Ibanez et al., 2008) and lack of impulsive control has shown to
mediate alcohol-related problems (Pearson & Henson, 2013). Individuals drinking motives
have also shown to mediate alcohol consumption in adolescence and older adults,
specifically coping and enhancement motives with social and conformity drinking motives
found in some studies but not others (Adam, 2012; Gilson, 2013; Bolger, 2000). The
present study supported previous research as coping and enhancement motives were found
to be a mediator of alcohol consumption in a communal sample made up of a diverse age
range with diverse occupations. The present study addressed the gap in the literature which
tends to target undergraduate students and the inclusion of a personality factor allows a
unique examination into how impulsive traits influence individuals drinking motives and
alcohol use. Future research would benefit by incorporating a mixed method by observing
impulsive behaviour traits, and by using a web diary to produce a more accurate measure
of alcohol consumption and impulsivity. Additionally longitudinal studies will benefit the
literature concerning interventions, to examine if those currently in place are working later
on in life. The variation in results from the current literature suggests that interventions
may benefit from being tailored to an individual’s specific personality and drinking
motives as research has demonstrated different impulsivity traits are associated with
different types of motivations for drinking and quantities of alcohol consumption (Magid
et al., 2007).
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 32
REFERENCES
Adams, Z. W., Kaiser, A. J., Lynam, D. R., Charnigo, R. J., & Milich, R. (2012). Drinking
motives as mediators of the impulsivity-substance use relation: Pathways for
negative urgency, lack of premeditation, and sensation seeking. Addictive
Behaviors, 37, 848-855. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.03.016
Amlung, M., Few, L. R., Howland, J., Rohsenow, D. J., Metrik, J., & MacKillop, J.
(2013). Impulsivity and alcohol demand in relation to combined alcohol and
caffeine use. Experimental And Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(6), 467-474.
doi:10.1037/a0034214
Armitage, C. J., Rowe, R., Arden, M. A., & Harris, P. R. (2014). A Brief Psychological
Intervention That Reduces Adolescent Alcohol Consumption. Journal Of
Consulting And Clinical Psychology, doi:10.1037/a0035802
Bartholow, B. D., Henry, E. A., Lust, S. A., Saults, J., & Wood, P. K. (2012). Alcohol
effects on performance monitoring and adjustment: Affect modulation and
impairment of evaluative cognitive control. Journal Of Abnormal Psychology,
121(1), 173-186. doi:10.1037/a0023664
Bertholet, N., Gaume, J., Faouzi, M., Daeppen, J., & Gmel, G. (2011). Perception of the
amount of drinking by others in a sample of 20-year-old men: The more i think you
drink, the more i drink. Alcohol And Alcoholism, 46(1), 83-87.
doi:10.1093/alcalc/agq084
Blonigen, D. M., Timko, C., Moos, B. S., & Moos, R. H. (2009). Treatment, Alcoholics
Anonymous, and 16-year changes in impulsivity and legal problems among men
and women with alcohol use disorders. Journal Of Studies On Alcohol And Drugs,
70(5), 714-725.
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 33
Bolger, A. K. (2000). Reasons for drinking alcohol in retirement community-dwelling
older adults. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60,
Burton, C. M., Pedersen, S. L., & McCarthy, D. M. (2012). Impulsivity moderates the
relationship between implicit associations about alcohol and alcohol use.
Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors, 26(4), 766-772. doi:10.1037/a0028742
Cludius, B., Stevens, S., Bantin, T., Gerlach, A. L., & Hermann, C. (2013). The motive to
drink due to social anxiety and its relation to hazardous alcohol use. Psychology Of
Addictive Behaviors, 27(3), 806-813. doi:10.1037/a0032295
Collins, R., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol
consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-
administration of alcohol. Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychology, 53(2),
189-200. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.53.2.189
Cooper, M. L. (1994). Motivations for Alcohol Use Among Adolescents: Development
and Validation of a Four-Factor Model. Psychological Assessment. 6(2), 117-128.
doi: 1040-3590/94
Coskunpinar, A., Dir, A. L., & Cyders, M. A. (2013). Multidimensionality in impulsivity
and alcohol use: A meta‐analysis using the UPPS model of impulsivity.
Alcoholism: Clinical And Experimental Research, 37(9), 1441-1450.
doi:10.1111/acer.12131
Curcio, A. L., & George, A. M. (2011). Selected impulsivity facets with alcohol
use/problems: The mediating role of drinking motives. Addictive Behaviors, 36,
959-964. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.05.007
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 34
Cyders, M. A. (2013). Impulsivity and the sexes: Measurement and structural invariance of
the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Assessment, 20(1), 86-97.
doi:10.1177/1073191111428762
Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C.
(2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior:
Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological
Assessment, 19(1), 107-118. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.107
Davis, C. G., Thake, J., & Vilhena, N. (2010). Social desirability biases in self-reported
alcohol consumption and harms. Addictive Behaviors, 35(4), 302-311.
doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.11.001
De Bruijne, M., & Wijnant, A. (2013). Comparing survey results obtained via mobile
devices and computers: An experiment with a mobile web survey on a
heterogeneous group of mobile devices versus a computer-assisted web survey.
Social Science Computer Review, 31(4), 482-504
Dick, D. M., Smith, G., Olausson, P., Mitchell, S. H., Leeman, R. F., O'Malley, S. S., &
Sher, K. (2010). Understanding the construct of impulsivity and its relationship to
alcohol use disorders. Addiction Biology, 15(2), 217-226. doi:10.1111/j.1369-
1600.2009.00190.x
Doremus-Fitzwater, T. L., Barreto, M., & Spear, L. P. (2012). Age-related differences in
impulsivity among adolescent and adult Sprague-Dawley rats. Behavioral
Neuroscience, 126(5), 735-741. doi:10.1037/a0029697
Dunne, E. M., Freedlander, J., Coleman, K., & Katz, E. C. (2013). Impulsivity,
expectancies, and evaluations of expected outcomes as predictors of alcohol use
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 35
and related problems. The American Journal Of Drug And Alcohol Abuse, 39(3),
204-210. doi:10.3109/00952990.2013.765005
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll.
Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.
Gilson, K., Bryant, C., Bei, B., Komiti, A., Jackson, H., & Judd, F. (2013). Validation of
the Drinking Motives Questionnaire (DMQ) in older adults. Addictive Behaviors,
38(5), 2196-2202. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.021
Huckle, T., You, R., & Casswell, S. (2010). Socio-economic status predicts drinking
patterns but not alcohol-related consequences independently. Addiction, 105(7),
1192-1202. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02931.x
Hustad, J. P., Pearson, M. R., Neighbors, C., & Borsari, B. (2014). The Role of Alcohol
Perceptions as Mediators Between Personality and Alcohol-Related Outcomes
Among Incoming College-Student Drinkers. Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors,
doi:10.1037/a0033785
Ibáñez, M. I., Ruiperez, M. A., Villa, H., Moya, J., & Ortet, G. (2008). Personality and
alcohol use. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, D. H. Saklofske (Eds.) , The SAGE
handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol 1: Personality theories and
models (pp. 677-697). Thousand Oaks, CA US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Jones, K. A., Chryssanthakis, A., & Groom, M. J. (2013). Impulsivity and drinking
motives predict problem behaviours relating to alcohol use in university students.
Addictive Behaviors, doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.024
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 36
Jones, K. A., Chryssanthakis, A., & Groom, M. J. (2014). Impulsivity and drinking
motives predict problem behaviours relating to alcohol use in University students.
Addictive Behaviors, 39(1), 289-296. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.024
Juárez, J., Muñoz-Villegas, P., Guerrero-Álvarez, Á., & Flores-Ocampo, P. (2013).
Assessing impulsivity in prepubertal male rats: A novel device and method to
assess motor and cognitive impulsivity. Experimental And Clinical
Psychopharmacology, 21(4), 315-322. doi:10.1037/a0032611
Kivlahan, D. R., Marlatt, G., Fromme, K., Coppel, D. B., & Williams, E. (1990).
Secondary prevention with college drinkers: Evaluation of an alcohol skills training
program. Journal Of Consulting And Clinical Psychology, 58(6), 805-810.
doi:10.1037/0022-006X.58.6.805
Lehavot, K., Stappenbeck, C. A., Luterek, J. A., Kaysen, D., & Simpson, T. L. (2014).
Gender differences in relationships among PTSD severity, drinking motives, and
alcohol use in a comorbid alcohol dependence and PTSD sample. Psychology Of
Addictive Behaviors, 28(1), 42-52. doi:10.1037/a0032266
Littlefield, A. K., Sher, K. J. & Wood, P. K. (2010). Do changes in Drinking Motives
Mediate the Relation Between Personality Change and “Maturing Out” of Problem
Drinking? Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 119(1), 93-105. doi:
10.1037/a0017512
Luciana, M., Collins, P. F., Muetzel, R. L., & Lim, K. O. (2013). Effects of alcohol use
initiation on brain structure in typically developing adolescents. The American
journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 39(6), 345-355. doi:
10.3109/00952990.2013.837057
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 37
Magid, V., & Colder, C. R. (2007). The UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale: Factor structure
and associations with college drinking. Personality And Individual Differences,
43(7), 1927-1937. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.013
Magid, V., MacLean, M. G., & Colder, C. R. (2007). Differentiating between sensation
seeking and impulsivity through their mediated relations with alcohol use and
problems. Addictive Behaviors, 32(10), 2046-2061.
doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.015
Mezquita, L., Stewart, S. H. & Ruiperez, A. M. (2010). Big-Five personality domains
predict internal drinking motives in young adults. Personality and Individual
Differences, 49, 240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.043
Mohr, C. D., Armeli, S., Tennen, H., Temple, M., Todd, M., Clark, J., & Carney, M.
(2005). Moving Beyond the Keg Party: A Daily Process Study of College Student
Drinking Motivations. Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors, 19(4), 392-403.
doi:10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.392
Moore, A. A., Whiteman, E. J., & Ward, K. T. (2007). Risks of combined
alcohol/medication use in older adults. The American journal of geriatric
pharmacotherapy, 5(1), 64-74. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.03.006
Pearson, M. R., & Henson, J. M. (2013). Unplanned Drinking and Alcohol-Related
Problems: A Preliminary Test of the Model of Unplanned Drinking Behavior.
Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 27(3), 584-595. doi: 10.1037/a0030901
Poulos, C. X., Parker, J. L., & Lê, D. (1998). Increased impulsivity after injected alcohol
predicts later alcohol consumption in rats: Evidence for 'loss-of-control drinking'
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 38
and marked individual differences. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112(5), 1247-1257.
doi:10.1037/0735-7044.112.5.1247
Read, J. P., Wardell, J. D. & Bachrach, R. L. (2013). Drinking consequence types in the
first college semester differentially predict drinking the following year. Addictive
Behaviors, 38, 1464-1471. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.07.005
Read, J. P., Wood, M. D., Kahler, C. W., Maddock, J. E., & Palfai, T. P. (2003).
Examining the role of drinking motives in college student alcohol use and
problems. Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors, 17(1), 13-23. doi:10.1037/0893-
164X.17.1.13
Romosz, A., & Quigley, B. M. (2013). Does alcohol use mediate the association between
consequences experienced in high school and consequences experienced during the
first semester of college?. Journal Of College Student Development, 54(2), 215-
221. doi:10.1353/csd.2013.0020
Sharma, L., Markon, K. E., & Clark, L. (2013). Toward a Theory of Distinct Types of
“Impulsive” Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis of Self-Report and Behavioral Measures.
Psychological Bulletin, doi:10.1037/a0034418
Silveri, M. M. (2012). Adolescent brain development and underage drinking in the United
States: Identifying risks of alcohol use in college populations. Harvard Review Of
Psychiatry, 20(4), 189-200. doi:10.3109/10673229.2012.714642
Stahl, C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., Nuszbaum, M., Tüscher, O., Lieb, K., & Klauer, K.
(2013). Behavioral Components of Impulsivity. Journal Of Experimental
Psychology: General, doi:10.1037/a0033981
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 39
Stautz, K., & Cooper, A. (2013). Impulsivity-related personality traits and adolescent
alcohol use: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(4), 574-592.
doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.003
Stockwell, T., Donath, S., Cooper-Stanbury, M., Chikritzhs, T., Catalano, P., & Mateo, C.
(2004). Under-reporting of alcohol consumption in household surveys: A
comparison of quantity-frequency, graduated-frequency and recent recall.
Addiction, 99(8), 1024-1033.
Tait, R. J., French, D. J., Burns, R. A., Byles, J. E., & Anstey, K. J. (2013). Alcohol,
hospital admissions, and falls in older adults: A longitudinal evaluation.
International Psychogeriatrics, 25(6), 901-912.
Tapert, S. F., Baratta, M. V., Abrantes, A. M., & Brown, S. A. (2002). Attention
dysfunction predicts substance involvement in community youths. Journal Of The
American Academy Of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(6), 680-686.
doi:10.1097/00004583-200206000-00007
Theakston, J. A., Stewart, S. H., Dawson, M. Y., Knowlden-Loewen, S. A., & Lehman, D.
R. (2004). Big-Five personality domains predict drinking motives. Personality and
Individual Differences, 37(5), 971-984. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.007
United Kingdom Department of Health (2013). Reducing harmful drinking. Retrieved on
23rd January 2014 from https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/reducing-
harmful-drinking
Role of impulsivity and drinking motives on alcohol use 40
Uy, P. J., Massoth, N. A., & Gottdiener, W. H. (2013). Rethinking Male Drinking:
Traditional Masculine Ideologies, Gender-Role Conflict, and Drinking Motives.
Psychology of Men & Masculinity. doi: 10.1037/a0032239
Weigold, A., Weigold, I. K., & Russell, E. J. (2013). Examination of the equivalence of
self-report survey-based paper-and-pencil and internet data collection methods.
Psychological Methods, 18(1), 53-70. doi:10.1037/a0031607
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a
structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality And
Individual Differences, 30(4), 669-689. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7
World Health Organisation (2011). United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
(the) socioeconomic context. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/global_alcohol_report/profiles/
gbr.pdf
World Health Organisation (2013). Global Information System on Alcohol and Health
(GISAH). Retrieved from http://www.who.int/gho/alcohol/en/index.html
Zaldívar, F. F., Molina, A. M., López Ríos, F. F., & García Montes, J. M. (2009).
Evaluation of alcohol and other drug use and the influence of social desirability:
Direct and camouflaged measures. European Journal Of Psychological
Assessment, 25(4), 244-251. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.25.4.244