+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Milky Way - Texas A&M...

The Milky Way - Texas A&M...

Date post: 23-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
61
The Milky Way Cerro Tololo Inter- American Observatory Large Magellanic Cloud K. Don, NOAO/AURA/NSF Monday, April 2, 12
Transcript
Page 1: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Milky Way

Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory

Large Magellanic Cloud

K. Don, NOAO/AURA/NSFMonday, April 2, 12

Page 2: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Roger Smith/NOAO/AURA/NSF

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 3: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Panoramic Picture of Milky Way taken from Death Valley, CA, Dan Duriscoe, US National Park Service

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 4: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Panoramic Picture of Milky Way taken from Death Valley, CA, Dan Duriscoe, US National Park Service

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 5: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Panoramic Picture of Milky Way taken from Death Valley, CA, Dan Duriscoe, US National Park Service

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 6: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Milky Way Galaxy

Our Galaxy is a collection of stars and interstellar matter - stars, gas, dust, neutron stars, black holes -

held together by gravity

Composite near-IR (2 micron) Image from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (IPAC/Caltech/UMass)

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 7: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Historical Models of the Milky Way Galaxy

Greeks: Γαλαξίας κύκλος Galaxias Kyklos "Milky Circle".

Roman: Via Lactea (Milky Way).

East Asia: “Silvery River” of Heaven (Chinese: 銀河; Korean: eunha; Japanese: Ginga)

Finno-Ugric (Finns, Estonians): “Pathway of the Birds”. Birds follow path for migrations... some evidence this is true.

Austrailian Aboriginal: Wodliparri (house-river).

Galileo first suggested the Milky Way is a vast collection of individual stars.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 8: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Historical Models of the Milky Way Galaxy

In 1780 William Herschel produced the map below by counting stars in different directions. He concluded that the Sun is near the center of the Galaxy, and that the

dimensions along the plane were five times greater than the vertical thickness.

Herschel assumed (1) all stars have same luminosity (Absolute Magnitude), (2) Number density in space is roughly constant, and (3) there is nothing in space to obscure the Stars

(fainter stars are farther away)

Sun

In mid-1700s, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and Thomas Wright (1711-1786) proposed the Galaxy must be a disk of stars to

explain the circular distribution in the sky. They went further and suggested our Sun is one component in the Milky Way.

William Herschel (1738-1822)

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 9: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Historical Models of the Milky Way Galaxy

Jacobus Kapteyn (1851-1922)

Jacobus Kapteyn (1851-1922) used star counting to confirm the Herschel model, but with much-improved methods. Now

called the Kapteyn Universe.

Galaxy consists of a flattened Spheroidal system with a decreasing stellar density with increasing distance from the center. His published self-titled “attempt” to describe the “Stellar system” (=Milky Way) appear in the year he died

(Kapteyn 1922, ApJ, 55, 302):

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 10: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Historical Models of the Milky Way Galaxy

Numbers show where stellar density has declined by a factor of 2, 3, ... 10, from the central density.

Sun, y=650 pc, x=38 pc

Kapteyn Universe

Picture of the Galaxy:

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 11: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Historical Models of the Milky Way Galaxy

Harlow Shapley (1885-1972)

From 1915-1919, Harlow Shapley estimated the distances to 93 globular clusters using RR Lyrae and W Virginis variable stars

(like Cepheids). Shapley found they are not uniformly distributed in the Galaxy, but are concentrated in the

constellation Sagittarius (where the center of Galaxy is). He determined these were 15,000 pc (15 kpc) away.

The most distant clusters he could measure were 70 kpc away. Shapley argued our Galaxy has a diameter of 100 kpc, close to 10x that of Kapteyn. Also as important, Shapley put

our Sun far from the center of the Galaxy. Kapteyn had the Sun near the center.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 12: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Historical Models of the Milky Way Galaxy

Who was right, Kapteyn or Shapley ?

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 13: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Historical Models of the Milky Way Galaxy

Who was right, Kapteyn or Shapley ?

Neither ! They are both wrong, but for the same reason. They both ignored the effects of dust, which causes the extinction of light.

Kapteyn missed stars he could not see, could not see the most distant regions of the Milky Way.

Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he thought because their apparent magnitudes were extincted.

Similar to being on a boat and trying to see land through fog.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 14: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Credit: Axel Aitoff

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 15: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Infrared (3-8 micron) view of Center of Milky Way GalaxyMonday, April 2, 12

Page 16: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Morphology of the Milky Way

from Digital Sky LLC

Sun

R0 = 8 kpc

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 17: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Morphology of the Galaxy

The solar Galactocentric distance, R0, is still debated. In 1985 the International Astronomical Union (IAU) adopted R0 = 8.5 kpc. Recent studies

find R0 = 8 kpc (Eisenhauer 2003). Your book uses this latter value.

The Galaxy is composed of a bulge, a thin and thick disk, and a halo.

Most stars are in disk components. Disk contains lots of gas and dust.

Halo has low density and it contains many globular clusters.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 18: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Morphology of the Galaxy

Structure of Thin and Thick Disks

We define the size of the components using the scale height. (We don’t have a way of defining the “edge” of the galaxy or its components ? )

If n is the number density of stars in the disk, and z is the vertical distance above the Galactic midplane, then the number density scale height is

1/Hn = -(1/n) (dn/dz)

Take Hn to be a constant (OK assumption) then we can solve for n using differential equations:

n = n0 exp( -z/Hn )

If Hn = z then n = n0 e-1, so H is the point where the number density has dropped by a factor of e.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 19: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Morphology of the Galaxy

Structure of Thin and Thick Disks

Galactic Disk has two major components, the thin disk, and the thick disk.

Thin disk: composed of young stars, dust, and gas, with Hnthin = 350 pc (youngest stars found with scale height of 35-90 pc).

Thick disk: older stars with a scale height of Hnthick = 1000 pc. The number density of stars in the thick disk is ~8.5% that of the thin disk.

Total distribution of stars is given from current observations:

n(z,R) = n0 ( exp[-z/Hthin] + 0.085 exp[-z/Hthick] exp( -R/Hradial )

where z is the vertical height above the midplane, and R is the distance from the Galactic center. Hradial = 2.25 kpc, n0 ≈ 0.02 stars/pc3 for 4.5 < MV < 9.5.

Note that these are all still uncertain....

Our Sun is a member of the thin disk, and lies about 30 pc above the midplane.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 20: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Morphology of the Galaxy

Age-Metallicity Relation

Thin and thick disks have different scale heights, stellar densities, and metal fractions and ages !

Recall that stars have different metal fractions, different Populations.

Population I: high metal fractions, Z~0.02.

Population II: low metal fractions, Z~0.001.

Population III: zero metal fraction, Z~0. (hypothesized).

Astronomers commonly use the ratio of Iron (Fe) to Hydrogen (H) relative to that in the Sun to quantify the metal fraction. We call this the metallicity:

Stars with [Fe/H] > 0 have a higher metal fraction than the Sun. Stars with [Fe/H] < 0 have a lower metal fraction.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 21: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Morphology of the Galaxy

Age-Metallicity Relation

Stars with [Fe/H] > 0 have a higher metal fraction than the Sun. Stars with [Fe/H] < 0 have a lower metal fraction.

extremely metal-poor stars (Population II) have [Fe/H] ~ -5.4. Highest values are [Fe/H] ~ 0.6.

Studying Globular Cluster “turn-off” masses, younger clusters have high [Fe/H] then older clusters, which have low [Fe/H]. This is the

age-metallicity relation.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 22: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Morphology of the GalaxyAge-Metallicity Relation

Rana 1991, ARAA, 29, 129

Time since formation of disk (Age - td, where td = 12 Gyr)

Solar Value

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 23: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Morphology of the Galaxy

Thin Disk: typical iron-hydrogen ratios are -0.5 < [Fe/H] < 0.3.

Thick Disk: typical iron-hydrogen ratios are -0.6 < [Fe/H] < -0.4 (some as low as -1.6?!)

Which contains older stars ? Which “formed” first ?

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 24: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Morphology of the Galaxy

Thin Disk: typical iron-hydrogen ratios are -0.5 < [Fe/H] < 0.3.

Thick Disk: typical iron-hydrogen ratios are -0.6 < [Fe/H] < -0.4 (some as low as -1.6?!)

Which contains older stars ? Which “formed” first ?

Appears that star formation began in thin disk about 8 Gyr ago, and is continuing today. This is supported by the cooling times of white

dwarfs in the thin disk.

Thick disk predated most of that of the thin disk by 2-3 Gyr, probably during the period 10-11 Gyr ago.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 25: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

from Digital Sky LLC

Spiral Structure

Galaxy M 51Monday, April 2, 12

Page 26: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Spiral Structure

from Digital Sky LLC

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 27: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Evidence for Spiral Structure

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 28: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Evidence for Spiral Structure

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 29: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 30: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 31: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 32: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 33: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 36: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Bulge

Galactic Bulge: Independent component from disk. Mass of the bulge is believed to be ~1010 M⊙. Scale Height is ~100 to 500 pc, depending on whether younger stars are used (smaller scale heights) than older stars (higher scale heights).

Surface brightness (units of L⊙ pc-2 ) follows the “r1/4 law” distribution, discovered by Gerard de Vaucouleurs (1918-1995), also called the de

Vaucouleurs profile.

Our Bulge has an effective radius, re = ~0.7 kpc.

The Bulge is very difficult to observe because it is so centrally concentrated and there is a lot of dust and gas in the Galactic center. Must look in “windows”

with lower extinction (one is the so-called “Baade’s window”).

Stars in the bulge have -2 < [Fe/H] < 0.5. Possibly multiple metallicity groupings in bulge. One group is <200 Myr old, one is as old as 7-10 Gyr.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 37: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Bulge

Bulge shows (at least) two populations. One with low [Fe/H] and high [α/Fe], and one with high [Fe/H] and low [α/Fe].

McWilliam 1997

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 38: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Bulge

Stars with low [Fe/H] have high [α/Fe]. (Oxygen is an alpha element). Early metal production occurred from core-collapse Supernovae, which produce more Oxygen (and

other α-elements) compared to Fe (which comes from Type Ia Supernovae).

Gilmore et al. 1989

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 39: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Morphology of the Galaxy

Thin Diskcontains Spiral Arms

Thick Disk

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 40: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Milky Way Galaxy

The Galactic Bulge

COBE Satellite image of Milky Way at 1.2-3.5 micron.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 41: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic HaloGalactic (“Stellar”) Halo is composed of globular clusters (GCs) and field stars.

Shapley thought GCs were spherically distributed. There now appear to be two populations.

Older, metal-poor globular clusters have [Fe/H] < -0.8, spherical distribution.

Younger clusters have [Fe/H] > -0.8, in Galactic plane

Zinn 1985, ApJ, 293, 424

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 42: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic HaloGalactic (“Stellar”) Halo is composed of globular clusters (GCs) and field stars.

Older, metal-poor globular clusters have [Fe/H] < -0.8, spherical distribution.

These metal-poor GCs range from 500 pc to 120 kilo-pc ! Youngest is about 11 Gyr old and oldest are about 13 Gyr old.

Zinn 1985, ApJ, 293, 424

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 43: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Components of the Galaxy

Neutral Gas Thin Disk Thick Disk Bulge Halo

Mass (1010 M⊙) 0.5 6 0.2-0.4 1 0.3

LB (1010 L⊙) 0 1.8 0.02 0.3 0.1

M/LB - 3 ~10 3 ~1-3

Radius (kpc) 25 25 25 4 >100

Scale Height (kpc)

<0.1 0.35 1 0.1-0.5 3

[Fe/H] >+0.1 -0.5 to +0.3 -2.2 to -0.5 -2 to 0.5 < -5.4 to -0.5

Age [Gyr] <~ 10 8 10 <0.2 to 10 11 to 13

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 44: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Rotation Curves of the Milky Way

Rotation curve for our Galaxy. Strange thing is.... rotation curve is flat beyond the Solar circle, R0 = 8.5 kpc.

Clemens 1985, ApJ, 295, 422

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 45: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

r

R0Let Mass of Galaxy have a constant surface density, Σ, for r < R. Velocity is

then just from Newton’s Laws:

R

with yields

Solving for v, gives: for r < R

For r > R, we have:

Solving for v, gives: for r > R

Rotation Curves of the Milky Way

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 46: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies

Observations !v ~ constant (r0)

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 47: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Rotation Curves of the Milky Way

Rotation curve for our Galaxy. Strange thing is.... rotation curve is flat beyond the Solar circle, R0 = 8.5 kpc.

Clemens 1985, ApJ, 295, 422

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 48: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

You can work out what the matter density profile should be to match the observed rotation curves of galaxies.

Assume it is spherical:

rdr

Consider a spherical shell of radius r and thickness dr. The mass in the shell is dMr

Take Newton’s laws for the force acting on a particle (a star) in this shell.

rearranging and differentiating

Let the mass in the shell be

Then this leads to:

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 49: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Solving for the density gives

A slight variation keeps the density from diverging at r → 0 :

This is the Dark Matter distribution in galaxies. True for the Milky Way and others.

Julio Navarro, Carlos Frenk, and Simon White in 1996 ran a series of cold-dark

matter simulations, and they came up with a “Universal profile” used today:

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 50: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

This is the Dark Matter distribution in galaxies. True for the Milky Way and others.

Julio Navarro, Carlos Frenk, and Simon White in 1996 ran a series of cold-dark matter compute simulations, and they came up with a “Universal profile” used today:

Simon WhiteCarlos FrenkJulio Navarro

This seems valid over an very large range of a and ρ0. For the smallest galaxies to the largest galaxy clusters.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 51: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

Simon WhiteCarlos FrenkJulio Navarro

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 52: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Center

Challenging to observe because of all the dust/gas !

But, in 15 million years, the Sun will be 85 pc above the Galactic midplane, we would presumably have a much better view then !

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 53: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Center

Astronomers use high angular resolution images in the near-IR (~2 micron) to help see through the dust. This is helpful because

there are large number of K and M giant stars (T ~ 4000 K) in the central part of the galaxy, and

these are brightest in at 2-micron.

Note that the nearest star to the Sun is ~1 pc away. The density of

stars is much higher in the Galactic Center !

From Schödel et al. 2002Monday, April 2, 12

Page 54: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Center

Astronomers use high angular resolution images in the near-IR (~2 micron) to help see through the dust. This is helpful because there are large

number of K and M giant stars (T ~ 4000 K) in the central part of the galaxy, and these are brightest in at 2-micron.

Astronomer group led by Rainer Schödel and Reinhard Genzel followed the orbits of K-giants near the Galactic center.

One star, S2, has a period of 15.2 yr with eccentricity e=0.87 and perigalacticon distance of 1.8 x 1013 m = 120 AU (a few times bigger than

Pluto’s orbit).

You can work out from Kepler’s laws that the mass interior to S2’s orbit is ~3.5 x 106 solar masses.

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 55: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Center

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 56: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Center

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 58: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Center

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 59: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Center

Nature, Vol. 419, p. 694 (2002)

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 60: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Center

Nature, Vol. 419, p. 694 (2002)

Monday, April 2, 12

Page 61: The Milky Way - Texas A&M Universitypeople.physics.tamu.edu/papovich/courses/spring12/lecture_Milky_… · of the Milky Way. Shapley’s variable stars were more luminous then he

The Galactic Center

Degeneracy between distance to center of Galaxy and Mass

of supermassive blackhole

Monday, April 2, 12


Recommended