• Fewer accidents
• Seasonal no-go areas
• Less emissions
Reduced Environmental Impact
Optimal routes -12% less emission
Risk reduction -shore and ship
• More route optimisationservices
• Just-in-time port arrivals
• Shorter turn-around times
Increased Efficiency
Terminal
VTS/
VesselIncreased predictability ETB/ETD
Improved turn-around-timeIncreased port efficiency
Optimized use of berths/resourcesReduced waiting/anchoring time
”Port operators”
Port Control
100 % of the cost (fence to fence)
27 % (berth to berth)Bunker cost
(70 %)
Cost Distribution in Sea Transports
Approach Management
System
SingleWindow
Service Provider System
Port Community System
VesselOperating
System
Shipping ERP
Port CDM Information Service System
SeaSWIM
Port CDM – no replacement
BUDGET: 24 M Euro
BUDGET: 4 M Euro
39 Partners10 Countries
7 Partners3 Countries
2010 - 2013 2013-2015 2015-2018
BUDGET: 43 M Euro
50+ Partners13 Countries
Defining the STM concept: governance,
technical needs, services and benefits
Route Exchange Feasibility
Study
Validating the business value of STM and its services on 300
vessels, in 13 ports and 5 service centres
The STM evolution
• Policy, Operational and Technical• FONASBA part of Operational• Input & some results of Advisory
groups• Information sharing principles:
• Information owner decide who can share
• Mandatory services receive minimum information needed
• Who to work closer with: eg. IPCSA• Right focus of the Port Collaborative
Decision Making concept
MONALISA 2.0 Advisory Groups