Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | xiomara-lovin |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The New Hampshire Primary: What it means
to the state and the nation
Library and Archives of NH’s Political Tradition
Ross Gittell, Associate Professor, UNHBrian Gottlob, President, PolEcon Research
The benefits of the NH Primary accrue to the state and to the nation
• Political and social benefits for the state and nation as the primary engages a high percentage of citizens
• NH citizens’ personal contact with the candidates and focused discussion of issues influences election outcome
• Candidates get tested and learn... come away stronger candidates
• Economic benefits for the state and its citizens via spending and jobs and media exposure
Most important are the benefits to the nation of having an active and engaged electorate test the qualifications of candidates….
In 2000, national and international media truly acknowledged the value of NH’s role in the political process
The national media messages about the New Hampshire primary ….1992, 1996 and 2000
• 1992: “The worst economy in the country”
• 1996: “Home of retail politics”, “Politically atypical”, and “Traditional”
• 2000: ”Retail Politics”, “Serious voting electorate”, “Informed”, and “Crucial”
NH was still portrayed as “different”, but in 2000, it was portrayed as more of a virtue
Top Media Impressions (000's)
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Bitter cold
Technology Leader
Informed Electorate
Crucial
Serious Electorate
Traditional
Politically Atypical
Home of Retail Politics
1996 2000
Full slates for both Democrats and Republicans meant more exposure for NH Primary in 2000 than in 1996
Exposure by month, in impressions
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
October November December January February MarchMonth
Su
m o
f im
pre
ssio
ns (
in m
illio
ns)
1996 Primary (held 2/21/96)
2000 Primary (held 2/1/00)
The First-in-the-Nation Primary
1,991,458
18,089,729
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
1996 2000
Potential readers exposed to the message that NH deserves its status as "First in the Nation"
Media stories about NH voters engagement reflected reality, not just image
% of Voting Age Citizens
9%
10%
13%
68%
74%
75%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Made a Campaign Contribution
Shook hands
Attended Campaign Event
Watched One or More Debate
Paid "Some" or " A lot of" attention
Voted in Primary
UNH Survey Center. July, 2000
From the June 15, 1999 New York Timesdescribing New Hampshire as a state with: “a justifiable reputation for being a state with informed voters who ask informed questions”
Quotes of Note:
Wall Street Journal, August 23, 2000
• “In 2000 the word got out….New Hampshire has a strong economy for high-tech ventures and is an attractive place for start-up businesses”
• “New Hampshire has an active and well-informed electorate…the highest level of involvement among the 2000 presidential nominating contests”
Economic Impacts
The first-in-nation primary benefits some industries in NH but the overall impact is often exaggerated by outsiders…it is about .6 of 1% of the state’s gsp in the peak year of primary activity
The economic impact of the 2000 primary was 50% greater than the impact of the 1996 primary
$210
$306
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
1996 2000
Increased media coverage was a big reason for expenditure increases (campaign spending rose only modestly)
370
593
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1996 2000
Number of reporters covering the NH Primary
How we produced our economic estimates
• Travel, tourism, and tax data• Federal Election Commission campaign
expenditure reports• Media content analysis• Interviews with businesses and with
campaign workers• Employed recognized econometric
methods and models
Most of the economic impacts occurred in the year preceding the primary
$231
$33$37
$5
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Timing of Economic Impacts ($million)
Imputed MediaValue ('96-'99)March '96-Feb.'99
Imputed MediaValue ('99-'00)March '99-Feb. '00
Overview of Economic Impacts of the New Hampshire Primary(March 1, 1999 - Feb. 28, 2000)
Media and Visitor Spending $71 million
Direct CampaignSpending $12 million
Total Direct Spending $83 million
Total Spending $231 million(Direct,Indirect & Induced)
Value ofBusiness DevelopmentExposure$26.4 million
Total Economic Benefits - $231 million sales and 2,248 jobs (March 1, 1999-Feb. 28, 2000) - $6.6 million tourism promotion
$264 Million - $26.4 million business development -
Value ofTourism PromotionExposure$6.6 million
The lodging, restaurant, media, communications, and trans. industries, along with households receive the greatest benefits
Sales ($ millions)
$37
$26
$25
$18
$12
$8
$3
$1
$57
$43
$33
$29
$27
$14
$6
$3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Households*
Hotel/Rest.
Comm/Trans
Services
Retail
F.I.R.E
Const.
Manuf.
2000
1996
* Households refers to payments for labor (wages)
Total Primary spending of $231 million results in over 2,200 jobs
$83
1,511$31
$116 255
467
Spending ($million) Jobs
Induced
Indirect
Direct
$231 2,248
Half of the jobs created are in the lodging and restaurant industries
Full-Time Equivalent Jobs Resulting from Primary
12
59
59
113
187
175
428
1,187
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Manuf.
Const.
F.I.R.E.
Comm/Trans/Util.
Retail
Gov.
Services
Lodging/Rest.
Media Coverage and Advertising Equivalency
The First-in-the-Nation primary is the #1 media opportunity in NH… the word gets about about candidates, the issues and about NH
Why media coverage is important
• An audience of 222 million people worldwide were exposed to stories about NH via media coverage of the primary during primary
Specific Media Data
• Top media outlets covering the Primary: – ABC World News This Morning– Business Week– CNBC-TV– CNN - Crossfire– Kansas City Star– London Free Press– Charleston Post & Courier– Chicago Sun Times– CNN– Raleigh News and Observer
Specific Media Data
• Most positive media outlets: – Boston Globe– USA Today– Atlanta Journal and Constitution– LA Times– ABC– Dallas Morning News– Washington Post– NY Times ABC World News This
Morning– Business Week– CNBC-TV
Specific Media Data
• Most negative media outlets: – San Francisco Chronicle– Boston Herald– Orlando Sentinel– Indianapolis Star– Denver Post– Tampa Tribune– Times-Picayune– Richmond Times-Dispatch– San Francisco Examiner– Rock Hill (SC) Herald
The positive articles translate into positive impression of NH for 22 million people (up from 15 million in ‘96)
• Positive impression of the state for 22 million
• Research shows that 3% of those positively exposed will eventually visit
• Thus, news coverage of the primary will contribute to 660,000 visits to NH (3% of 22 million)
• Each $10 of advertising by NH attracts 1 visitor. Thus 660,000 visits = $6.6 million in advertising value
The impact of media coverage on tourism
220 million media impressions
22 million positive impressions
660,000 non-primary visits(3% of 22 million)
$6.6 million in tourismadvertising equivalency @ $10/visitor
(about twice NH’s tourismadvertising budget)
International media coverage also impacts business development
660,000 visits to NH (3% of 22 million)
13,200 corporate decision- makers and entrep. (2% of 660,000 - actual US figure is 11%)
132 new businesswith avg. 20 emp. per business= 2,640 employees
@ $10,000 subsidy/business development value per emp.= $26,400,000
132 new businesses(1% of 13,200 or .0002 of all visits)
Let’s keep NH First....
• There is strong interest & support for a collaborative effort to keep NH First-in-the-Nation ...with industry leaders, public officials and others..
Why NH should be First...
– we in NH take our role very seriously…we know that every vote always counts
– there are national benefits from an engaged & informed electorate in NH
– our small scale and strong tradition of participation and engagement ensures that $ and media do not determine our primary election outcomes
– ideas and voter contact are most important in NH
– “underdogs” still have a chance in NH– we are not in it for the money…but it helps
particular sectors of the economy