the concept of the algorithm;
testing of the algorithm;
application to the POLDER/PARASOL data
O. Dubovik, M. Herman, A. Holdak, T. Lapyonok, D. Tanré, F. Ducos, P. Litvinov, Y. Govaerts, A. Lopatin
Science and Technology University of Lille, CNRS, France
O. Dubovik, M. Herman, A. Holdak, T. Lapyonok, D. Tanré, F. Ducos, P. Litvinov, Y. Govaerts, A. Lopatin
Science and Technology University of Lille, CNRS, France
The optimized algorithm for deriving detailed properties of aerosol from satellite
observations.
The optimized algorithm for deriving detailed properties of aerosol from satellite
observations.
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
“independent” POLDER/PARASOL
measurements :
GLOBAL: every 2 days SPATIAL RESOLUTION: 5.3km × 6.2km
VIEWS: N 16: (800 ≤ ≤ 1800)
INTENSITY (I): Nt6 (for aerosol): (0.44, 0.49, 0.56, 0.67, 0.865, 1.02 m)
Nt (for gas absorption): (0.763, 0.765, 0.910 m)
POLARIZATION (Q, U): NP3: (0.49, 0.67, 0.865 m)
SINGLE OBSERVATION:
NtNP
×N = (6+3)×16= 144
a lot !!! – as much as AERONET
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
New POLDER/PARASOL algorithm
(Dubovik et al., AMT, 2011)
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
• The new algorithm uses complete set of PARASOL angular measurements in all spectral bands including both radiance and linear polarization measurements.
• Continuous space of aerosol and surface properties is used.
• The algorithm is based on statistically optimized fitting.The core of the new PARASOL algorithm is based on the same concept as AERONET aerosol retrieval (O. Dubovik and M. King, 2000; O. Dubovik, 2004; O. Dubovik et all, 2006).
1
Slide 3
1 heritage of AERONET algorithm developmentsPavel Lytvynov, 5/15/2012
New algorithm(Dubovik et al., AMT, 2011)
Two main modules of the algorithm:• forward module (VRT in coupled atmosphere-
surface system)- modeling of single scattering aerosol
properties
- modeling of surface reflection properties
• numerical inversion module
Forward module. Aerosol model
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
C Kspherical (
rmin
rmax
k;n;r )V(r )dr (1C) K (k;n;r ,)
min
max
N()d
rmin
rmax
V(r )dr
retrieved
C + (1-C)
Aspect ratio distr.
Aerosol model is the same as in AERONET retrieval (Mixing of particle shapes (Dubovik et al., 2006))
Forward module. Aerosol model
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascatti
Retrieved aerosol parameters:
T-matrix (when x < 50) and geometric-optic (when x >50) approximations were used for kernels calculations (Dubovik et al., 2006).
0.012 x 625 1.3 n 1.70.0005 k 0.5
The kernels were simulated in the wide range of size parameter and complex refractive index
x 2r / m n ik
Forward module. Surface reflection model
Semi-empirical BRDF models (for surface total reflectance description):-Rahman-Pinty-Verstraete (RPV) model (Rahman et al., (1993))-Ross-Li sparse model, Ross-Li dense model (Ross, (1981), Li, X., Strahler (1992))-Ross-Roujean model (Roujean et al., (1992))
Semi-empirical BPDF models (for surface polarized reflectance description):-Nadal-Breon model (Nadal and Bréon, (1999))-Maignan model (Maignan et al., (2009))
Physically based models for the reflection matrix for surfaces.-Cox-Munk model, Koepke model for whitecaps (for aerosol retrieval over ocean)-Physical models for land surface reflection matrix (under development) (Litvinov et al., 2011)
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
The concept of the algorithm. Numerical inversion module
The concept of statistical optimization is similar to AERONET retrieval (O. Dubovik and M. King, 2000; O. Dubovik 2004)
Two scenarios of retrieval (Dubovik et al., AMT, 2011):
- Conventional: single-pixel retrieval (each single pixel are inverted independently)
- New concept: multiple-pixel retrieval (group of pixels are inverted simultaneously)
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
Numerical inversion module.Single - Pixel Retrieval:
fj* - PARASOL data:
Angular measurements (~15 angles) of - Intensity ( = 0.49; 0.67; 0.87; 1.02 m) - Polarization ( = 0.49; 0.67; 0.87 m)
aj - Parameters to be retrieved:-Aerosol propetries:
- size distribution; - real refractive index- imaginary refractive index; - particle shape, - height
-Surface properties (over land):- BRDF parameters; - BPDF parameters
A Priori Constraints limiting derivatives (e.g. Dubovik 2004) of - for aerosols (e.g. in AERONET, Dubovik and King 2000) :- aerosol size distribution variability over size range;- spectral variability of complex refractive index;
- for surface (e.g. in AERONET/satellite retrievals, Sinuyk et al. 2007) :- spectral variability of BRDF/ PBDF parameters.
Multi-term LSM statistically optimized Solution (Dubovik and King 2000, Dubovik 2004) :
,where
PARASOL
O. DubovikM. HermanJ.-L. DeuzéF. DucosD. Tanré
!!!
Numerical inversion module. The concept of multi-pixel retrieval
X∆z
X∆x
t
( t1; x ; y )
( t2; x ; y )
( t3; x ; y )
X-Variability Constraints
Tim
e-Va
riabi
lity
Con
stra
ints
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
Numerical inversion module. Multi - Pixel Retrieval:
f1*
01
f2*
02
f3*
03
...
0t
0x
0y
F1
D1
00
00
00
F2
D2
00
00
00
F3
D3
... ... ...Dt,1 Dt,2 Dt,2
Dx,1 Dx,2 Dx,3
Dy,1 Dy,2 Dy,3
a1
a2
a3
= +
,where
Multi-term LSM Multi-Pixel Solution:
Multi-Pixel a priori constraints (e.g.Dubovik et al. 2008):- limited spatial variability of each aerosol /surface parameter- limited temporal variability of each aerosol /surface
parameter
NOTE: degree of variability constraints (smoothnes) can be different and adequately chosen for each parameter
Single-Pixel Data (PARASOL measurements andphysical a priori constraints) are used by the sameway as in Single-Pixel retrieval.
Observational conditions:
- Geometry is the same as for PARASOL over Banizoumbu (as in the example for actual PARASOL inversions)- Surface is bright;- Aerosol loadings: 16 cases for (0.44) = 0.01 – 4;- Aerosol types: Dust, Biomass Burning (original from AERONET)- Aerosol height – 3 km
Retrieved parameters:AEROSOL:
-dV(r)/dlnr (16 bins from 0.07 to 10 m);- n(), k(), 0()- Aerosol height- Fraction of spherical particles
SURFACE: SPATIAL – TEMPORAL:
- RPV BRDF (3 parameters for each ); - 4 pixels for each of 4 days- BPDF (1 parameter for each
Algorithm testing. LOA synthetic data
PARASOL: 0.44, 0.49 (p+), 0.565, 0.675 (p+), 0.87(p+), 1.02 mNO NOISE ADDED !!! (minor noise is always present)
Single-Pixel Retrieval, Desert Dust aerosol (non-spherical!!!)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Retrieval of Surface Reflect ance
0.050.100.200.400.801.001.201.501.802.002.202.402.603.003.504.00REAL
Surf
ace
Alb
edo
Wavelengths (m)
(0.44)
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Retrieval of 0( )
0.050.100.200.400.801.001.201.501.802.002.202.402.603.003.504.00REAL
Sing
le S
catte
ring
Alb
edo
Wavelengths (m)
(0.44)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.1 1 10
Retrieval of dV(r) / dlnr(normalized)
0.050.100.200.400.801.001.201.501.802.002.202.402.603.003.504.00REAL
Sing
le S
catte
ring
Alb
edo
Wavelengths (m)
(0.44)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Retrieval of (1.02) PARASOL
TRUERETRIEVED
Opt
ical
thic
knes
s
Optical Thickness
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4
Retrieval of (440) PARASOL
TRUERETRIEVED
Opt
ical
thic
knes
s
Optical Thickness
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4
Retrieval of Aerosol HeightPARASOL
TRUERETRIEVED
Aer
osol
Hei
ght (
km)
Optical Thickness
PARASOL: 0.44, 0.49 (p+), 0.565, 0.675 (p+), 0.87(p+), 1.02 mNOISE ADDED: 1% for I(), 0.005 for Q()/I() and U()/I() !!!
Single-Pixel Retrieval, Desert Dust aerosol (non-spherical!!!)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Retrieval of Surface Reflectance
0.050.100.200.400.801.001.201.501.802.002.202.402.603.003.504.00REAL
Surf
ace
Alb
edo
Wavelengths (m)
(0.44)
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Retrieval of 0( )
0.050.100.200.400.801.001.201.501.802.002.202.402.603.003.504.00REAL
Sing
le S
catte
ring
Alb
edo
Wavelengths (m)
(0.44)
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4
Retrieval of (440) PARASOL
TRUERETRIEVED
Opt
ical
thic
knes
s
Optical Thickness
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Retrieval of (1.02) PARASOL
TRUERETRIEVED
Opt
ical
thic
knes
s
Optical Thickness
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.1 1 10
Retrieval of dV(r) / dlnr(normalized)
0.050.100.200.400.801.001.201.501.802.002.202.402.603.003.504.00REAL
dV(r
)/dln
r (m
3 /m
2 )
Wavelengths (m)
(0.44)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4
Retrieval of Aerosol HeightPARASOL
TRUERETRIEVED
Aer
osol
Hei
ght (
km)
Optical Thickness
PARASOL: 0.44, 0.49 (p+), 0.565, 0.675 (p+), 0.87(p+), 1.02 mNOISE ADDED: 1% for I(), 0.5% for Q()/I() and U()/I() !!!
Multi-Pixel Retrieval (i.e. temporal and spatial variability of surface and aerosol is limited)Desert Dust aerosol (non-spherical!!!)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Retrieval of Surface Reflectance
0.050.100.200.400.801.001.201.501.802.002.202.402.603.003.504.00REAL
Surf
ace
Alb
edo
Wavelengths (m)
(0.44)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Retrieval of (1.02) 3MI (all channels)
TRUERETRIEVED
Opt
ical
thic
knes
s
Optical Thickness
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4
Retrieval of (440) 3MI (all channels)
TRUERETRIEVED
Opt
ical
thic
knes
s
Optical Thickness
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Retrieval of 0( )
0.050.100.200.400.801.001.201.501.802.002.202.402.603.003.504.00REAL
Sing
le S
catte
ring
Alb
edo
Wavelengths (m)
(0.44)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.1 1 10
Retrieval of dV(r) / dlnr(normalized)
0.050.100.200.400.801.001.201.501.802.002.202.402.603.003.504.00REAL
Sing
le S
catte
ring
Alb
edo
Wavelengths (m)
(0.44)
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4
Retrieval of Aerosol Height3MI (all channels)
TRUERETRIEVED
Aer
osol
Hei
ght (
km)
Optical Thickness
Dubovik et al.AMT, 2011
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 9000.09
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.18
0.19
0.20
0.21
A
OT
wavelength,nm
MERIS
LOA-2
true
AOT(412)=0.2
OUMISR/JPL
LOA-1
MERIS-WS
MODIS/NASA
SU
MISR/PSI
Single-view
A.Kokhanovsky et al, 2010. “Blind tests”
Black underlying surface
0 1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
4
5LOA-2
retri
eved
AO
T
reference AOT
412nm 443nm 490nm 565nm 675nm 870nm 1020nm
0 1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
4
5LOA-2
retri
eved
AO
T
reference AOT
412nm 443nm 490nm 565nm 675nm 870nm 1020nm
POLDER: LOA-2(Dubovik) algorithm (BRDF)
Algorithm testing. Synthetic case studies, A.Kokhanovsky, 2012 CCI project
“Climate ESA Retrieval of Aerosols”
Case 1 Case 2
0 1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
4
5LOA-2
retri
eved
AO
T
reference AOT
412nm 443nm 490nm 565nm 675nm 870nm 1020nm
POLDER: LOA-2(Dubovik) algorithm (BRDF)
Case 3
Algorithm testing. Synthetic case studies, A.Kokhanovsky, 2012 CCI project
“Climate ESA Retrieval of Aerosols”
Dust and biomassBanizoumbu/Niger
Application to the POLDER/PARASOL data
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
%
%
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
January - December 2009(Banizoumbou/Niger)
(0.44) AERONET(0.44) PARASOL
0(0.44) - AERONET
0(0.44) - PARASOL
(0.4
4)
00.44
Days in year 2009
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
January - February 2009(Banizoumbou/Niger)
(0.44) AERONET(0.44) PARASOL
0(0.44) - AERONET
0(0.44) - PARASOL
(0.4
4)
00.44
Days in year 2009
BanizoumbouNIGER
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Banizoumbou, Niger (January-February 2009)
y = 0.093046 + 0.86974x R= 0.95856
PAR
ASO
L A
OT
(0.4
4 m
)
AERONET AOT (0.44 m)
Application to the POLDER/PARASOL data
Optical ThicknessPARASOL versus AERONET
0.44 m 1.02 m
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Banizoumbou, Niger (January-February 2009)
y = 0.021873 + 0.73607x R= 0.97787
PAR
ASO
L A
OT
(1.0
2 m
)
AERONET AOT (1.02 m)
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
Application to the POLDER/PARASOL dataSingle Scattering Albedo
PARASOL versus AERONET0.44 m 1.02 m
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
Dust and biomassBanizoumbu/Niger
PARASOL versus AERONET
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
Dust and biomassBanizoumbu/Niger
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
PARASOL versus AERONET
0.44
0.87 1.02
BanizoumbouNIGER
SurfaceAlbedo
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
January - February 2009(Banizoumbou/Niger)
(0.44) AERONET(0.44) PARASOL
0(0.44) - AERONET
0(0.44) - PARASOL
(0.4
4)
00.44
Days in year 2009
BanizoumbouNIGER
MODIS (dark target)
MODIS (dark target)
New PARASOL algorithm
Algorithm Status:1. Core Algorithm is developed and performs well:
- uses very elaborated aerosol and RT models; - based on rigorous statistical optimization; - performs well in numerical test (Dubovik et al. 2011, Kokhanovsky et al. 2010);- has a lot of flexibility for constraining retrieval:
both for single-pixel and/or multi-pixel scenarios)- can be applied for other satellites/instruments- can use data from other satellite/inmessagestruments
(CALIPSO, MODIS, AERONET etc)2. Issues:
- too long - 10 sec per 1 pixel!!!- needs to be optimally set for operational processing - cloud – screening – need to be improved !!!
Described in Dubovik et al., AMT, 2011
Main Objective:to make algorithm practical
ICAP 2012 workshop, 17 May, Frascati
BanizoumbouNIGER
0(0.44) 0(1.02)
(0.44)
BanizoumbouNIGER
0(0.44) 0(1.02)
(0.44)
Aerosol particle size distribution
ASSUMPTIONS used by AERONET:
- dV/dlnr - volume size distribution of aerosol in total atmospheric column;
- size distribution is modeled using 22 triangle size bins (0.05 ≤ R ≤ 15 m);
- size distribution is smooth
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.1 1 10
Size Distribtuion Approximation
Particle Radius (m)
Vtotal
(r) = ( i=1,...,22)
aiV
i(r)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.1 1 10
Size Distribtuion
dV/d
ln(r
) (m3 /m
2 )
Particle Radius (m)
Voriginal(r)
(Twomey 1977)
Trapezoidal approximation
Modeling Polydispersions:
dV r d ln r
Ci
dv j r d ln ri 1,...,N
Optimized representation of aerosol size distribution with limited number of size bins
0
5
10
15
20
0.1 1 10
Approximation by Log-Normals
Particle Radius (m)
dV/d
ln(r
) (m
3 /m2 )
Vtotal
(r) = ( i=1,...,5)
aiV
i(r)
0
5
10
15
0.1 1 10
Trapezium Approximation
Particle Radius (m)
dV/d
ln(r
) (m
3 /m2 )
Vtotal
(r) = ( i=1,...,5)
aiV
i(r)
.
..
.
.
..
Approximation by Small number of « bins »
dV r d ln r
Ci
dv j r d ln ri 1,...,5
dV r d ln r
Ci
dv j r d ln ri 1,...,5
Réunion Parasol-Calcul-Tosca au CNES, PARIS , 10 février, Paris
WP-1.2 Aerosol composition representation :
The software has been prepared for calculating spectral complex refractive index based on Shuster et al. 2009 approach:
Water+Soluble+Insoluble++BC+IRON
n()
k()
Réunion Parasol-Calcul-Tosca au CNES, PARIS , 10 février, Paris
Concept of internal mixing of the aerosol components:
Insoluble Inclusions: - Black Carbon- Iron- other insoluble components
(“quartz”)
n()
k()
Host media: Water + Soluble Soluble - Ammonium Nitrate with the properties depending on Relative Humidity (RH)
Maxwell Garnett’s Effective Medium Approximation:-----------------------------------------------------describes the macroscopic properties of a medium based on the properties and the relative fractions of its components
Schuster et al. 2005, 2009
Réunion Parasol-Calcul-Tosca au CNES, PARIS , 10 février, Paris
Synergy GEOSTATIONARY and POLAR(multi-pixel approach)
X∆z
X∆x
t
( t2; x ; y )
X-Variability Constraints
Tim
e-Va
riabi
lity
Con
stra
ints
FCI/MTG 3MI/EPSSG( t3+i∆t; x ; y )
( t3+i∆t; x ; y )
( t3+i∆t; x ; y )
( t3; x ; y )
( t1; x ; y )
Additionally the retrieval can use the data from:
- CALIPSO;- MODIS,- AERONET, etc.