Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | myles-grinnell |
View: | 223 times |
Download: | 2 times |
population growth
• Since beginning of common era
(AD 1), population has grown to 6 billion
• At the current 2% growth rate, next 5 billion could take only 35 years!
• 98% of population growth between 1998 and 2025 expected to occur in poorer countries
population and development
• as long as each person contributes something to the economy (positive MP), pop and econ growth positively correlated
• but, if MP<AP, declining welfare of the average citizen
output equation
• O = LX• O: output• L: number of workers• X: output per worker
• O/P = (L/P)X…output per capita• P: population
output per capita
• output per capita determined by• share of population in labor force (L/P)• output per worker (X)
• whatever affects these 2 factors is population growth’s effect on development
factor 1: share of population in labor force
• changes in age distribution• rapid growth means higher percentage of
young people• large supply of people too young to work
• slow growth means high % of older people• retirement effect
• high pop growth retards per capita economic growth by decreasing % of pop in labor force
factor 2: output per worker
• most common productivity enhancer: accumulation of capital
• is there a connection between pop growth and cap accumulation?
• 2 connections:• more savings leads to more capital
• fast growing pop save less
• law of diminishing marginal productivity• with fixed factor (land), adding more labor diminishes
productivity
population / environment connection
• trees cut for fuel for an expanding population or to clear land for agriculture
• marginal lands being brought into production
• migration to river deltas in search of fertile soil: vulnerable to storm surges
population / environment connection debate
• Malthusian hypothesis (positive feedback)
• more people, less resources, must travel further for fuel, have more children to help, intensifying scarcity problems
• Boserup’s induced innovation (negative feedback)
• increased pop triggers more demand for agriculture, incentives emerge for innovation, results in more intensive, sustainable practices
what about effect of development on population?
• theory of demographic transition: as nations develop they eventually reach a point where birthrates fall
• stage 1: prior to industrialization, birthrates / death rates stable
• stage 2: after industrialization, lower death rates (same birthrates)
• stage 3: falling birthrates
economics of pop control
• will parents make efficient childbearing decisions?
• sources of market failure• congestion externalities• low key commodity prices artificially lower
costs of children• food• education…school taxes same for 2 vs. 6 children
microeconomic theory of fertility
• children are “consumer durables”
• MB of children is downward sloping• ceteris parabis, as children become more
expensive, demand for them will diminish
• example• MB1=MC1, optimal children Q1• if MB shifts down or MC up, less is optimal• what would cause these to shift?
changing desired family size
• decreased benefits• shift from agriculture to industry • less demand for children as social security• decrease in infant mortality
• increased costs• increased opportunity cost of mother’s time
(more educational and labor mkt opportunities)
• scarcity / cost of housing• cost of education