+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Projeet Directo)rNorhEs(ua ivlhosPoet Regioal...

The Projeet Directo)rNorhEs(ua ivlhosPoet Regioal...

Date post: 19-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: halien
View: 233 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
411.» . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.. ... i. . . .y... O F F InC E - ASSM____ The Projeet Directo)r...NorhEs(ua ivlhosPoet Regioal Prjeem"KAngmnUntMiityQUOERGoto Hous No. 02,Diiip HzuriPat Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
Transcript

411.»

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2.. ... i. . . .y... O F F InC E -

ASSM____

The Projeet Directo)r...NorhEs(ua ivlhosPoetRegioal Prjeem"KAngmnUntMiityQUOERGotoHous No. 02,Diiip HzuriPat

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

., ... VA. *~t;.-

i .. . S ..5.' V~'r. *. .r-.

.,

.....~r ttb\ ;

.- a- .~-j . -

z..-,~-. ~ .' It~- kt2{KYt= 'I~.. .-~-. .%s?r M .*1~ ~.** OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL AUI

4.. .- . **.~.A*'*** *

~.9J. . . , .-I -- - - & GUWAHATI-78 1029~$~4* *L * * * : . : *

ANNEXURE

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF OBSERVATIONS RAISED DURING AUDIT OF W(NORTH EAST RURAL LIVELIHOOD PROJECT Cr.No. SO35~IN FOR 3

U

rs~~ _

p ~j 1 Para NO. ParticularsAuthority : Inspection Re rt ofRPMU, Guwahati b ___

_ ytheA.G. And1 Para I of Part JIB Nonexistent Assets

r, Para 2 ofPart JIB Entertainment ofaddition burden forpayment ofhouse rent at two buildings at

___ a time ___

C, Pam 3 of Part JIB Payment of Honorarium towards SHG___ facilitators

_____

~4 ... Para 4 of Part fits Expenditure incurred in excess over the F

admissible limit5 Para S of Part JIB Excess release of fund to SHG as seed

________________________ fund6 Para 6 of Part JIB Procurement of furniture for residential

___ office_of_Secretary,_N EC ____

I ofI Para / ran LID Expenditure for Project Fad litation Team

- . -___________________ through NGO (Undue financial benefit) ___________________________*7 Pnrn 9 at Part TIP i C

h flieta~nAmni nd~utnrA

&RMSTERBB

OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (AUDIT), ASSAM, MAIDAMGAON,.BELTOLA, GUWAHATI - 29

i. SS-3.1(IAB)/NERLP/1-1/2015-16/625 L 13-11 01

rTe Project Director,roje 2 6 NOV 2North East Rural Livelihood oj ct,Regional Project Management it

Ministry of Development for the No . ion,

Govt. of India, House No.-02,

Near Nayantara, Sixth Mile,

G.S. Road, Guwahati-781022

09V7: 2014-2015 3M* T7' * The Project Director North East Rural Livelihood

Project w #af WT f4M7rT gfdahwl

3fl-q* 431*97 ;2 At fT 2014-2015 FF~ zft f t-T f4 3PW

qft -m qtw Nf4it(Rvr. 3.1)

INSPECTION REPORT ON THE ACCOUNTS OF THE PROJECT

DIRECTOR, NORTH EAST RURAL LIVELIHOOD PROJECT,

GUWAHATI FOR THE YEAR 2014-15.

PART-I

1.1 Introduction: The North East Rural Livelihood project (NERLP), was introduced by the

Govt of India with the support of the World Bank. The project aims to empower the rural poor

and improve their livelihood in two districts each in Mizoram (Aizwal and Lunglei) Nagaland

(Peren and Tuensong) Sikkim (South, West and 15 Panchayat wards of East District) and

Tripura (West and North Districts).

The North East Rural Livelihood Promotion Society (NERLPS), Guwahati registered on

15.05.2012 under Societies Registration Act 1860 is the primary agency responsible to oversee

the overall project implementation and provide policy and strategic guidance to NERLP. The

Regional Project Management Unit (RPMU) established within the autonomous North East

Rural livelihood Promotion Society (NERLPS), headquartered at Guwahati, headed by Project

Director have the overall responsibility for management and implementation of the project.

The District Project Management Units (DPMU) set up in all eight selected district in four

states are the key implementation entity for project activities at the district and block levels.

1.2 Fund Flow: The Ministry of DoNER, GOI releases the funds to NERLPS which receipts

the funds through a dedicated budget line for the World Bank financed project. NERLPS is

responsible for all expenditure in respect of the project , either directly or through the DPMUs.

It is also responsible for payments in respect of any expenditure incurred by the state project

coordinator and for monitoring and reporting on these funds. The PD, NERLPS releases the

funds to the DPMUs in the eight participating districts across four states as per their projected

fund requirement.

1.3 Scope of audit:

The accounts of the Project Director, North East Rural Livelihood Project (NERLP), Guwahati

for the year 2014-15 were test audited by an audit party from the office of the Accountant

General (Audit), Assam, Beltola, Guwahati-29 during the period from 14.09.14 to 23.09.15.The

accounts of District Project Management Units (DPMU) are not covered in this audit as the

same are supposed to be audited by the O/o the Accountant General (Audit) of the respective

states as per the arrangement put in place by the O/o the Comptroller and Auditor General of

India.

1.4. Incumbency:

The following officers held the charge of the Project Director, NERLP and acted as DDOduring the period covered by audit.

1

Name & Designation Period

From To(i) Hara Kumar Hajong 01.04.14 31.03.15

1.5. Receipt of Fund and Expenditure:

(Z in lakh)

Year Fund Opening Fund Book Miscella Total Fund Expendit Closingreceipts balance Received Adjustment neous Released ure balanceunder Income to 8

DPMUs2014-15 Bank 217.17 8998.08 1.87 0.01 9217.13 6411.09 844.01 1962.03

I Cash 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04

The position of fund released to District Project Management Units (DPMU):

Year Name of stat( Name of DPMU Total Fund released

2014-15 Mizoram Aizwal 854,49000

Lunglei 875,82739

Tripura North Tripura 807,47694

West Tripura 1100,75600

Nagaland Peren 634,27261

Tuensang 633,48500

Sikkim South Sikkim 760,67127

West Sikkim 744,10581

TOTAL 6411,08502

1.6 Disclaimer Statement:

The Inspection Report has been prepared on the basis of information furnished and made

available by the Project Director, NERLP, Guwahati. The office of the Accountant General

(Audit), Assam disclaims any responsibility for any misinformation and/or non-information on

the part of auditee.

1.7. Comments on accounts:

Over statement of Income over Expenditure amounting to T23976.

Scrutiny of Annual Accounts and Ledger for the year 2014-15 revealed that there were

discrepancies off23976 between the figures depicted in annual accounts and Ledgers in respect

of the following items under sub-component Project Management (Revenue).

2

(In 7)

SI no Name of the items Figure as per Figure as per DiscrepanciesAnnual A/cs Ledger A/cs

1 Salary for Officers 7975583 7971168 44152 Office equipment 0 & M 63790 59190 46003 Meeting /workshop 127424 112463 14961

Total: 23976

This resulted in overstatement of income over expenditure to that extent.

PART-II-A

NIL

PART II(B)

Para:1 Non existent assets Z27.46 lakh

Scrutiny of Fixed Assets as depicted in the annual accounts 2014-15 revealed that assets valued

at Z 2745661 was exhibited in the balance sheet in the form of "Internal Decoration and

Electrification". The said assets were created during 2010-11 and 2011-12 in the office of the

PD, NERLP which was functioning from a rented house at six Mile, G.S Road , Guwahati till

December 2014. As per the lease agreement entered between PD, NERLP (Lessee) and the

Lessor (M/s Raj Rishi Commercial Pvt Ltd) any internal additions or structural changes to the

premises in the nature of installing partitions, office fitting and fixtures, electrical appliance etc

shall be the property of the lessee and can be removed there from. The lessee shall however, be

liable for all costs incurred on the additions and structural changes and shall not recover or

claim any amount on this accounts from the lessor.

Test check of records revealed that though the O/o PD, NERLP was shifted January 2015 to

another rented building at Dilip Huzuri Path, Guwahati, and there was nothing on records to

suggest that office fitting and fixtures, partition and false ceiling, LAN and Networking,

electrical appliance etc installed in old office at a cost of T27.46 lakh were removed and utilized

in the new office building Scrutiny of records further disclosed that fresh expenditure was

incurred on refurbishment of O/o PD, NERLP and an amount of Z4,52,824 was paid to

suppliers till March 2015. Thus non-existent assets worth Z2745661 was exhibited in the

balance sheet during 2014-15 in the form of "Internal Decoration and Electrification".

In reply during exit meeting PD, NERLP stated that assets verification process was being

initiated and details of assets would be available in next year's accounts.

Para:2 Entertainment of additional burden of 75.09 lakh for payment of house rentat two buildings at a time

Test check of records revealed that the office of the PD, NERLP was shifted from the Rajrishi

Commercial, Six Miles to the house of Manish Choudhury at Dilip Huzuri Path during January

2015. Further checking revealed that although the office was shifted to the new location in

January 2015 but the NERLP had started paying rent from October 2014 onwards. It was also

3

seen that rent for the old building was paid upto March 2015 even though the office of NERLP

was shifted to the new building during January 2015. Due to payment of office rent

simultaneously for both the building (from 10/14 for the new building before the shifting and

from 01/15 for the old building) NERLP had to incur additional expenditure of Z5.09 lakh

(Annexure-1) which could have been avoided.

During the exit meeting the PD, NERLP stated that this was due to complete internal work

done in the new accommodation and dismantling of old accommodation carried out by third

party and situational circumstances which was beyond control.

Para:3 Payment of honorarium towards SHG facilitators amounting to?346.97 lakh Observation there of

Test check of records revealed that the PD, NERLP incurred an expenditure of

Z346.97 lakh on payment of honorarium to SHG Facilitators during 2014-15. The SHGs were

found to be appointed at the village level but their duties were not specifically laid down. It

may be mentioned that the area coordinators were already appointed for grass root level work

through NGOs. The necessity for appointment of SHG Facilitators was neither on records nor

provided in the project document. The performance report/ activity report indicating the duty

performed by the SHG facilitators to justify the payment of honorarium was also not available

on record. However, Activity report in respect of one SHG facilitators was furnished to audit

after collecting the same from the field offices, which revealed that though some duties were

assigned to the SHG facilitators but the same was not found adhered to. Thus, the engagement

of SHG facilitators was found to be made without any provision in the project report and

payments were made without any appraisal report. This resulted in irregular expenditure of

Z346.97 lakh on payment of honorarium to the SHGs facilitators.

In reply during exit meeting it was stated that SHG facilitator was engaged to help mobilize the

community, attend at the regular meetings of at least 10 SHGs formed within the respective

village. The reply was silent about the engagement of SHG facilitator as per the provision in

the project report and payment made to them based on assessment of their performance.

Basis of engagement of facilitators, targets & achievements of the facilitators may be furnished

to audit.

Para: 4 Expenditure incurred in excess over the admissible limit.

The Project Implementation Plan Documents stipulated permissible limit of expenditure to be

made against different components of the project out of the total fund received. The project

implementing authority is impacted to limit the expenditure within the prescribed limit.

Test check of records revealed that the PD, NERLP incurred a total expenditure of

Z7271.72 lakh during 2014-15, out of the above an amount of 7805.34 lakh was incurred in

excess of prescribed limit in case of Social Empowerment and Economic Development

component. Consequently, quantum of expenditure on Partnership Development and Project

4

Management components were less than the prescribed limit. . The details of the component

wise expenditure is given below-

Statement showing the position of Excess Expenditure on the various componentSI. Admissible Admissibi Expenditure (+)ExcessNo. Name of the component rate of the

proec fnd e amount incurred (-) Lessproject fund1 Social Empowerment 20% 1454.34 1836.06 (+)381.722 Economic Empowerment 60% 4363.03 4786.65 (+)423.623 Partnership Development 10% 727.17 29.47 (-)697.704 Project Management 10% 727.17 619.54 (-)107.63

Non-adherence to the component wise expenditure limit prescribed by the Project

Implementation Plan Documents was thus irregular.

During the exit meeting the PD, NERLP stated that deviation in expenditure limit was due to

disproportionate expenditure pattern being followed as the project was in initial years. The

reply was not tenable as the NERLP should adhere to the component wise expenditure

prescribed by PIP so that the project being implemented for the last three years (2012-15) is

successfully implemented as envisaged in the PIP.

Para:5 Excess release of fund to the SHGs as seed fund to the tune ofT1776.14 lakh

The Project Appraisal Document of NERLP provides SHG investment support under the

component of Economic Empowerment in the shape of seed grant in the first stage and

livelihood grant later on. The seed grant is provided for capitalization and mobilization. The

First assessment/ grading of the SHG would be carried out after six months from formation.

The SHG which qualifies with the minimum marks would be considered to be mature enough

to qualify for the seed support from the project (PIP-3.6.3.2). Existing SHGs who received any

revolving fund is not entitled for the seed grant. The Draft Community Operation Manual

provides the rate of seed grant to the SHGs Z10000/- each (Chapter 7) with the following

condition-

(a) Group having no assistance from any other source

(b) Completed six months of savings and inter lending

(c) Passed 1st grading

In course of audit it was noticed that during 2014-15 PD, NERLP released an amount of

71869.70 lakh to eight project district for onward disbursement to the 9356 SHGs. The

admissible amount for the seed grant @ Z.10000/- per SHG was Z93.56 lakh (9356X10000) but

the authority paid an amount of Z1869.70 lakh daily 2014-15 This has resulted in excess

expenditure of Z1776.14 lakh.

During exit meeting the PD, NERLP stated that the original Seed Fund amount of

Z l0000/ was subsequently revised to Z20000/ by a decision of the Executive Committee. But

the justification for 100 percent revision of rate and copy of the Executive Committee's

decision was not furnished in support of reply.

5

Para:6 Procurement of furniture for residential office of Secretary, NEC

Test check of records revealed that an amount of Z125480/ was paid (17.06.2014) to asupplier (De-Lux Furniture, Shillong ) for supply of office furniture at the residential office ofSecretary, NEC who is also the chairman of NERLP. The details of furniture procured aregiven below

(In 7)

Item no Description Quantity Amount paidI Conference Table 1 set 650002 Dining Table 1 set 340003 Executive Table 1 no 184854 Revolving chair 1 no 7995

TOTAL: 125480

During exit meeting PD, NERLP stated that procurement of furniture was made for the office

of the Chairman, NELPS at shillong as decided and requisition received. The reply is not

tenable as the Secretary, NEC who is also the chairman of NERLP and there is no separate

office for chairman, NERLP at shillong as per records furnished to audit.

The justification for procurement of furniture and utilization of the same in the residential

office of Secretary, NEC out of the project fund was not found on records which may kindly

be furnished to audit.

Para:7 Expenditure for Project Facilitation Team (PFT) through NGO

Test check of records revealed that the PD,NERLP incurred an expenditure of

Z2,77,78,430/-(Annxure-2) during 2014-15 for PFT staffs through 58 NGOs. The selection

of the NGOs was done through bidding process. The selection committee during evaluation

of the proposal of the NGOs allotted the rank as per the marks obtained on various aspects. It

was noticed that out of ?2,77,78,430/- an amount of Zl,65,00,980/- (Annexure-3) was

released to 15 NGOs ignoring the other NGOs secured relatively better rank. Thus NERLP

not only failed to avail the services of best available NGOs but extended un due financial

benefit to lower ranked NGOs.

During exit meeting the PD, NERLP stated that NGOs having experiences in the related field,

local presence and good track record are the main criteria for selection. Moreover, for healthy

competition and offering opportunities to more NGOs one NGO was allowed to handle up to

5 PFT. However, the PD, NERLP did not state the reasons for ignoring the higher ranking

NGOs while selecting the PFT.

Para:8 Operation of Current Bank Account

Scrutiny of records it was noticed that the NERLP was operating one current Bank account

(30783439816) with the SBI Six Mile Branch. All the transaction of the project was routed

through this account. The reasons for operating the current bank account was neither on records

nor could be produced to audit even after placing specific requisition. In this connection Audit

observed that, had the project fund been kept in Saving Bank account additional resources in

6

the form of bank interest could have been earned. Thus, due to operation of the current account

the authority could not earn the interest.

During exit meeting the PD, NERLP stated that the matter would be discussed in the next

Executive meeting and possibility of having a saving bank account would be explored.

Para:9 Outstanding advance of Z48,788

(A). As per Financial Management Manual of NERLP (North East Rural Livelihood Project),advances drawn should be settled within 15 days after completion of the programme or

purposes for which it was drawn. It should be ensured that advance should not be outstanding

for more than one month. In case advances drawn but adjustment bills not submitted in time

necessary steps are to be taken for recovery from monthly pay, penal action including

charging of interest from the person concerned. It is mandatory that no advances are

outstanding as on 3Is' March i.e. at the end of the financial year.

Scrutiny of cash book, ledger and voucher file revealed that the following amounts were

disbursed as advance payment for various purposes but awaiting adjustment till the date of

audit. (September 2015). The details are shown below:

S. Voucher Date Particulars of payment Payment made to Cheque AmountNo. No. whom No. (In Z)

1 743 24-03-2015 Payment for CDP preparation Dr. Putul Bhuyan 030585 9000.002 NA 31-03-2015 Payment for OA advance Narayan Ch. Deka NA 10008.003 33 29-04-2014 Payment for TA advance Adahe Sibo Chachei 146619 11280.00

I 4 406 05-11-2014 Payment for OA advance Simanta Hazarika 025276 13500.005 434 29-11-2014 Payment for purchase of fuel Simanta Hazarika 025509 5000.00

Total: 48788.00

Reasons for non-adjustment of the above amount may be stated to audit and necessary steps

may be taken to adjust the advances at the earliest under intimation to audit.

Para:10 Non deduction of Income Tax

Scrutiny of records revealed that the works relating to (1) Repairing of furniture's, and (2)

Carriage charges etc. was carried out by a contractor but the claim was finalised without

deduction of income tax at source @1% from the bills and thus excess payment made to the

tune of Z436.00 on the total bill value of Z43,600.00 which paid vide Voucher No. 709 dated

16-03-2015.

Reasons for non deduction of income tax may be stated to audit.

PART-III

NIL

Sd/

Deputy Accountant General (SS)

7

Memo No.-SS-3.1(IAB)/NERLP/1-1/2015-16/625-627 Date: 13-11-2015

Copy forwarded for information & necessary action to:

1. The Project Director,North East Rural Livelihood Project,Regional Project Management Unit

Ministry of Development for the North Eastern Region,

Govt. of India, House No.-02,

Near Nayantara, Sixth Mile,

G.S. Road, Guwahati-781022

2. The Secretary to Govt. of India

Ministry of Development for the North Eastern Region

Vigyan Bhawan Annexe, Maulana Azad Road,New delhi - 110011.

3. The Senior Audit Officer, FAAG Section

O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Assam,

Beltola, Guwahati-29

Senior Audit Officer (SS-3.1)

8

ANNEXURE-1 (Ref.- Para-2 of Part-IIB)

Statement showing the position of expenditure incurred on Rent on Office building

Annexure

SI. Vr. No. & Rent for Total TDS Net To whom paid RemarkNo. date the rent paid payment

Month

1 355, 14.10.14 Sep-14 73456 6538 66918 Rajrishi Commercial Pvt. Ltd.

2 357, 14.10.14 Sep-14 18000 1800 16200 Madan Prasad Bezbaruah

3 371, 18.10.14 Sep-14 96271 8568 87703 Manish Choudhury

4 403, 31.10.14 Oct-14 18000 1800 16200 Madan Prasad Bezbaruah

5 410, 11.11.14 Oct-14 96271 8568 87703 Manish Choudhury

6 419, 12.11.14 Oct-14 73456 6538 66918 Rajrishi Commercial Pvt. Ltd.

7 455, 04.12.14 Nov-14 18000 1800 16200 Madan Prasad Bezbaruah

8 464, 09.12.14 Nov-14 96270 8568 87702 Manish Choudhury

9 470, 09.12.14 Nov-14 73456 6538 66918 Rajrishi Commercial Pvt. Ltd.

10 516, 30.12.14 Dec-14 18000 1800 16200 Madan Prasad Bezbaruah

11 533, 20.01.15 Dec-14 96270 8568 87702 Manish Choudhury

12 548, 22.01.15 Dec-14 73456 6538 66918 Rajrishi Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Vr.Wanting

13 606, 06.02.15 Jan-15 18000 1800 16200 Madan Prasad Bezbaruah

14 620, 12.02.15 Jan-15 96270 8568 87702 Manish Choudhury

15 651, 04.03.15 Jan-15 73456 6538 66918 Rajrishi Commercial Pvt. Ltd.

16 655, 05.03.15 Feb-15 18000 1800 16200 Madan Prasad Bezbaruah

17 701, 12.03.15 Feb-15 96270 8568 87702 Manish Choudhury

ANNEXURE-2 (Ref.- Para-7 of Part-IIB)

Statement showing the position of release of fund to the NGOs during 2014-15

Sl. State District Name of the PFT & Name of the PFT & (NGO) Amount Released

No. (NGO) from RPMU

during the year

2014-15 (Rs)

I Nagaland Tuensang Snigsangyu Evergreen Welfare Society 674,850

2 Nagaland Tuensang Shitimtor Shekina Christian Foundation 520,850

3 Nagaland Tuensang C1re Evergreen Welfare Society 551,650

4 Nagaland Tuensang Chessore Shekina Christian Foundation 520,850

5 Nagaland Tuensang Lon-khim Better Life Foundation 521,210

6 Nagaland Tuensang NokIak Community Development 613,250Foundation

7 Nagaland Tuensang Noksen Community Development 582,450Foundation

8 Nagaland Tuensang 11noknyu Evergreen Welfare Society 567,050

9 Nagaland Peren Per:n Community Development 441,210Foundation

10 Nagaland Peren Tcninc Rongmei Baptist Association, 477,510

Nagaland

11 Nagaland Peren Jul c Community Development 477,510Foundation

12 Mizoram Aizawl P/1en Open Doors

13 Mizoram Aizawl Tia Inuam Open Doors

14 Mizoram Aizawl 'li ulthliah Goodwill Foundation

15 Mizoram Aizawl Ai k Block Goodwill Foundation

16 Mizoram Aizawl Do wn Block Open Doors

17 Mizoram Lunglei li ci RD Block Open Doors

18 Mizoram Lunglei ti iihial Open Doors

19 Mizoram Lunglei Lt 6SEN RD BLOCK World Vision India 451,110

20 Mizoram Lunglei H"J1 IMUN RD World Vision India 404,910

21 Sikkim South Himalayan Educational Society 451,110

Sikkim (HES)

22 Sikkim South s Himalayan Educational Society

Sikkim (HES) 404,910

23 Sikkim South I Iakru Himalayan Educational Society 404,910

Sikkim (HES)

24 Sikkim South Himalayan Educational Society

Sikkim (HES) 312,510

25 Sikkim South i Kapinzal Social Foundation

Sikkim (KSF) 451,110

26 Sikkim South R a Kapinzal Social Foundation

Sikkim (KSF) 404,910

27 Sikkim South Y Kapinzal Social Foundation

Sikkim (KSF) 404,910

28 Sikkim South Jol ing Rastriya Gramin Vikash Nidhi 312,510

Sik.kimli (RGVN)

29 Sikkim West Yoksom health Envirnoment Conservation 404,910

Sikkim Society (HECS)

30 Sikkim West Soreng I lealth Envirntment Conservation 451,110

Sikkim Society (HECS)

31 Sikkim West Dentam Himali Vikash Sansthan 404,910

Sikkim

32 Sikkim West Darandin H iimali Vika Sansthan 451,110

Sikkim

33 Sikkim West Kaluk Rastriya Gramin Vikash Nidhi 358,710

Sikkim (RGVN)

34 Sikkim West Gyalshing Rastriva Gramin Vikash Nidhi

Sikkim (RGVN) 451,110

35 Tripura North Dasda Tripura Bamboo & Cane 451,110

Tripura Development Centre (TRIBAC)

36 Tripura North Damchera Tripura Bamboo & Cane 358,710

Tripura Development Centre (TRIBAC)

37 Tripura North Kadamtala Rastriya Grainin Vikash Nidhi

Tripura (RGVN) 451,110

38 Tripura North Jampui Hill Tripura Bamboo & Cane 312,510

Tripura Development Centre (TRIBAC)

39 Tripura North Panisagar Tripura Bamboo & Cane 451,110

Tripura Development Centre (TRIBAC)

40 Tripura North Yubarajnagar Tripura Bamboo & Cane 404,910

Tripura Development Centre (TRIBAC)

41 Tripura North Pecharthal Hamkrai Badal Mission 774,280

Tripura

42 Tripura North Kumarghat ASHA 897,480

Tripura

43 Tripura North Gournagar Sanghadip 897,480

Tripura

44 Tripura West Hezamara DISHlARI 358,710

Tripura

45 Tripura West Lefunga. Jana Unnayan Samity of Tripura 451,110

Tripura (JUST) __

46 Tripura West Mohanpur Jana Unnayan Samity of Tripura 451,110

Tripura (JUST)

47 Tripura West Jirania Jana Unnayan Samity of Tripura 451,110

Tripura (JUST) _

48 Tripura West Mandai Khaipui Burui Bodal 404,910

Tripura

49 Tripura West Dukli DISHARI 358,710

Tripura

50 Tripura West Teliamura Twiphang Kaham Badal- 774,280

Tripura Teliamura Block

51 Tripura West Kalyanpur Twiphang Kaham Badal 897,480

Tripura

52 Tripura West Kathalia Ananta Welfare Society 835,880

____ Tripura

53 Tripura West Padmabil Khumpul Bural Bodol (KBB) 897,480

Tripura54 Tripura West Mungiakami Dopha Hamkwrai Bodol 897,480

Tripura

55 Tripura West Melaghar Ganadoot Social Welfare Centre 897,480

Tripura

56 Tripura West Boxanagar Ganadoot Social Welfare Centre 835,880Tripura

57 Tripura West Jampuijala Golaghati Welfare Society 897,480

Tripura

58 Tripura West Bishalgarh Golaghati Welfare Society 897,480

TripuraTotal: 27,778,430

ANNEXURE-3 (Ref.- Para-7 of Part-IB)

Sl. State District Name of Name of the Amount Rank Highest/Ist rank

No. the PFT & PFT & (NGO) Released allotted holder NGO

(NGO)/ from RPMU to the within the Block

Block during the NGO

year 2014-15(Rs)

1 Nagaland Tuensang Sangsangyu Evergreen 674,850 2nd Pro Rural

Welfare Society

2 Nagaland Tuensang Shamator Shekina Christian 520,850 3rd Pro Rural

Foundation

3 Tripura North Pecharthal Hamkrai Badal 774,280 4th TRIBAC

Tripura Mission

4 Tripura North Kumarghat ASHA 897,480 3rd TRIBAC

Tripura

5 Tripura North Gournagar Sanghadip 897,480 4th TRIBAC

Tripura

6 Tripura West Tripura Hezarnara DISHARI 358,710 Not Jana Unnayan

Applied Samiti Tripura

7 Tripura West Tripura Teliamura Twiphang Kaham 774,280 4th TRIBACBadal-Teliamura

Block

8 Tripura West Tripura Kalyanpur Twiphang Kaham 897,480 4th TRIBAC

Badal

9 Tripura West Tripura Kathalia Ananta Welfare 835,880 3rd TRIBAC

Society

10 Tripura West Tripura Padmabil Khumpul Burul 897,480 6th TRIBAC

Bodol (KBB)

11 Tripura West Tripura Mungiakarni Dopha Hamkwrai 897,480 5th TRIBACBodol

12 Tripura West Tripura Melaghar Ganadoot Social 897,480 3rd TRIBAC

Welfare Centre

13 Tripura West Tripura Boxanagar Ganadoot Social 835,880 3rd TRIBAC

Welfare Centre

14 Tripura West Tripura Jampuijala Golaghati 897,480 5th TRIBACWelfare Society

15 Tripura West Tripura Bishalgarh Golaghati 897,480 5th TRIBAC

Welfare Society 1_1Total: 16,500,980


Recommended