The Evolution of
Accelerometers and the
Future Role of Self-Reported
Physical Activity
Richard Troiano, Ph.D.
Wherefore Today?
• Overview of accelerometers and use
• Benefits of device measures
• Comparing devices and questionnaires
HOW ACCELEROMETERS
WORK
Accelerometer Methods
• Measures body movement in terms of
acceleration
– Related to intensity of physical activity
– Measured in 1 to 3 orthogonal planes
• anterior-posterior
• medial-lateral
• vertical
– “Moment-by-moment” (100 Hz – 1 minute)
– Data stored for later download/analysis
– Proprietary filtering and processing for “counts”
– Need intensity thresholds from calibration studies OR
– Algorithms to classify raw data
ACCELEROMETER USE
Accelerometer Cites in Scopus 2000-2015
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Art
icle
s
Year
Trend in Accelerometer Articles
“physical activity” OR exercise AND acceleromet*
National Surveillance with Devices
• National Health and Nutrition Survey of Japan
(pedometers) (annually since 1989)
• US National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey (NHANES) 2003-2006, 2011-2014
• Canadian Health Measures Surveys (2007-11)
• Health Survey for England 2008
• Australian National Nutrition and Physical
Activity Survey (NNPAS) 2011-2012
(pedometers)
• Finnish Health 2012
Large Cohorts with Devices
• Activity and Function of the Elderly in Ulm (ActiFE Ulm)
• Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)
• Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE)
• European Youth Heart Study (EYHS)
• Identification and Prevention of Dietary- and Lifestyle-Induced
Health Effects in Children and Infants (IDEFICS)
• International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the
Environment (ISCOLE)
• Millennium Cohort Study
• Personal and Environmental Associations with Children’s Health
(PEACH)
• Raine Study
• Sport Physical Activity & Eating Behaviour: Environmental
Determinants in Young People (SPEEDY)
• UK Biobank
• Women’s Health Study
Why?
ACCELEROMETER
BENEFITS
Stronger Biomarker Associations
Biomarker Self-report Accelerometer
Beta (SE) Adj. Wald F Beta (SE) Adj. Wald F
SBP 0.01 (0.03) 0.23 -0.43 (0.14) 8.89**
BMI -0.04 (0.01) 14.95*** -0.77 (0.08) 86.71****
HDL (mg/dL) 0.10 (0.03) 8.54** 1.41 (0.27) 27.77****
Glycohemoglobin -0.004 (0.001) 7.91** -0.05 (0.01) 47.11****
Glucose 0.01 (0.07) 0.06 -1.67 (0.30) 30.77****
Insulin (μU/mL) -0.08 (0.03) 10.15** -1.11 (0.12) 81.53****
Atienza et al., 2011 MSSE
Minutes in bouts, Beta per 10 min unit
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.001
**** p < 0.0001
Precise Time Resolution
– NHANES 2003-2006
– Ages 6-19 y
– Cardiometabolic risk score:
• Waist circumference
• Non-HDL cholesterol
• C-reactive protein
• Systolic blood pressure
Published: October 5, 2011
Sporadic vs. Bouts of MVPA
5-min bouts 10-min bouts
* BRFSS 2005 (30 min x 5d moderate or 20 min x 3 d vigorous)
** NHANES 2003-2004 (150 min/week moderate or greater intensity)
*** NHANES 2003-2004, 20-59 y (30 min x 5d moderate or greater, Troiano et al. 2008)
49.9
3.8
57.8
46.4
3.2
42.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
BRFSS Self-Report* NHANES Self-Report** Accelerometer***
% m
eeti
ng
reco
mm
en
dati
on Men Women
U.S. Adults Meeting PA Recommendations
HOW I USED TO THINK ABOUT
THESE RESULTS
Skeptic’s View of Self-Report
16
Dr. Gregory
House, M.D.
Everybody lies.
I’ve found when you want to know the truth
about someone, that someone is probably
the last person you should ask.
Shall We Play Football?
The Football Example
• Time
• Position
• Movement
Thanks to Heather Bowles
Physical Activity Conceptual Framework
Pettee Gabriel et al., 2012 JPAH
Related, but not quantitatively identical
Measures: Self-Report vs. Devices
• Physical activity ≠ physical activity
– Even if you express it as MET minutes
• Participants report behaviors
– Perceptions
– Context
• Devices (primarily) measure motion
• Each approach has value, but the measure
must match the purpose & combo may be best
• Measurement of Active and Sedentary
Behaviors: Closing the Gaps in Self-Report
Methods
– Supplement to JPAH January 2012
Similar Concerns for Sedentary
• TV-watching
• Screen-time (TV, video, various computer)
• Total reported sitting
• Actigraph counts <100, <150
• Postural measures
Which is Better?
Barolo Brunello
“Not better, just different”
Thank you