+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The promise of T cell engineering CD19 CAR therapy A...

The promise of T cell engineering CD19 CAR therapy A...

Date post: 17-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: buimien
View: 217 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
17
The promise of T cell engineering CD19 CAR therapy A prologue to immune regenerative medicine Vast potential, patience, public education Academies’ Cell Therapy Workshop Washington, October 13, 2016 Michel Sadelain, MD, PhD Director, Center for Cell Engineering Immunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY
Transcript

The promise of T cell engineering

CD19 CAR therapy A prologue to immune regenerative medicine

Vast potential, patience, public education

Academies’ Cell Therapy Workshop Washington, October 13, 2016

Michel Sadelain, MD, PhD Director, Center for Cell Engineering

Immunology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, NY

The rise of engineered T cells as cancer drugs

• Safety • Efficacy

• Potency • Specificity • Long-acting

• A major limitation of most existing cancer therapeutics is the lack of specificity or curative potential.

• Engineered T cells offer the prospect of combining specificity, potency and persistence from an optimized “living drug”.

Brentjens et al, Nat Med, 2003

Human CD19 CAR-targeted peripheral blood T cells eradicate systemic B lymphoma and ALL in mice

Br

B B

K

Br

H H V

C

Tumor Free Untreated 4 weeks

Day ≥ 5 Inoculation

WAVE Bioreactor

Selection ClinExVivo MPC

CAR+ expanded T cells

Day 3- 4 Transduction

SFG- CAR Vector

Apheresis Patient T cells

Incubation Dynabeads CD3/28

CD3+ enriched activated

T cells

DAY ≥ 1 0 Debeading

ClinExVivo MPC

Wash (Cell Saver5)

CAR transduced

T cells

Cryopreservation

Biosafety/ QC release tests

Patient Infusion

Validation In vivo antitumor activity

in SCID mice, CTL

CAR T cell Manufacturing Flow

Hollyman et al, J. Immunother, 2009

Przybylowski et al, Gene Ther, 2006

Day 0 Apheresis Thaw/Wash (Cell Saver5)

Isabelle Riviere Xiuyan Wang

Number of Patients N=45 (%) [95% CI]

Overall CR Rate

Morphologic disease (≥5% blasts) Minimal disease (<5% blasts)

37/45 (82%) [68 – 92]

18/24 (75%) [53 – 90] 19/21 (91%) [70 – 99]

Overall MRD Negative CR Rate* 30/36 (83%)

Mean Time to CR (SD) 22 days (9.4) *Assessed among those patients who achieved CR and evaluable for MRD analysis (n=36)

Relapsed, chemo-refractory adult ALL Summary of Clinical Outcomes (MSKCC, ASH 2015)

Overall Survival By MRD Status After CAR T Cell Treatment

Time Since CAR T Cell Infusion (Months)

Bone Marrow Transplant

Graft vs

Leukemia

Tumor Immunology

Adoptive Immunity

Natural ACTs • LAK • TIL • DLI • VST

Define and Isolate Natural T Cells

Gene Transfer

(Gene editing)

Chimeric antigen

receptors

(Synthetic biology)

Engineered ACT • The CD19 Paradigm

• Armored CARs

Design and Manufacture T Cells

Sadelain, Curr Opin Immunol, 2016

3rd gen 2nd gen – armored (CL)

1st gen 2nd gen

• 2nd gen CARs • CAR + X (armored CARs)

• CD4/CD8 ratio (defined composition) • T cell subset (eg TCM)

Sadelain and Mulligan, ICI, 1992

• Retroviral vectors (gRV, LV) • Transposons (Sleeping Beauty)

Meganuclease CRISPR-Cas9

Zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN) TALE nuclease (TALEN)

T-iPS-derived CAR-targeted T cells

Engineered T-iPS

Engineered antigen-specific T

lymphocytes

T-iPS

+

Chimeric Antigen

Receptor (CAR)

Hematopoietic specification and expansion

T lymphoid commitment

day 0 day 1

BMP-4

day 4

BMP4+bFGF

Mesoderm formation

VEGF, bFGF, SCF, FLT3L, IL-3

day 8 day 10

SCF, FLT3L, IL-3 OP9-DLL1 co-culture

SCF, Flt3L, IL-7

CAR+ T cell day 30

CAR+ T-iPS Day 22

TSP

ETP

β DJ

Pre-T

CD7 CD5

γδ VDJ γδ-T

TCRγδ CD4- CD8-/CD8αα

β VDJ Pre-Tα

ISP DP

Pre-TCR CD4 CD8α-/+

TCRαβ CD3 CD4 CD8αβ

α VJ

CD4SP

CD8 SP

TCRαβ CD3 CD4

TCRαβ CD3 CD8αβ

apoptosis

CD4SP

T helper

CD4SP T regulatory

CD8 SP

CD8 SP

T effector

T memory

MHC positive

selection

How T cells are made (in the thymus)

Themeli, Cell Stem Cells, 2015

1928z-T-iPS-T cells lyse CD19+ tumor cells in vitro and in vivo

In vitro No treatment 1928z-αβ 1928z-γδ

1928z+ T-iPS-T

Pre-

T ce

ll Da

y 7

Day

14

Day

18

Day

22

Day

35

Day

50

p=0.042

p=0.0038

p=0.0005

In vivo

CD19+ Raji-FFLuc i.p. Themeli, Nature Biotechnology, 2013

A perspective for large-scale generation of potent histocompatible therapeutic T cells

Themeli, Riviere & Sadelain, Cell Stem Cells, 2015

From idea to proof-of-concept to clinical benefit CD19 CAR therapy 1992-2013

Mouse T cell Engineering Sadelain and Mulligan, 1992

CD19 CAR therapy POC Brentjens et al, 2003

Clinical trials FDA Breakthrough design., 2014

Cell Therapy and Cell Engineering Facility

Isabelle Rivière, PhD, Director

• Non-profit; Grants, philanthropy, foundations • Current GMP Facility: 6 cleanrooms • New GMP facility opening 2014: 13 cleanrooms • Cellular products (CAR T cells, HSCs, DCs, NK cells, cord blood, hES/DA neurons, T-iPS), • RNA vectors, plasmid DNA, CRISPR/Cas9 • Phase I/II clinical trials • Multicenter trials with other academic centers

Public education and network building

TNS9.3.55 collaborative network for the cure of beta-thalassemia

Seattle New York

MSKCC - NYPH NIH

Palermo Cagliari Rome Thessaloniki

Beirut

Farid Boulad New York

Isabelle Rivière New York

Aurelio Maggio Palermo

John F. Tisdale Bethesda

Vip Viprakasit Bangkok

Renzo Galanello Caglari

Bangkok


Recommended