0 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee
November 18, 2010
City of San Diego
February 16, 2011
THE REGIONAL AVIATION STRATEGIC PLAN (RASP) ANDTHE AIRPORT MULTIMODAL ACCESSIBILITY PLAN (AMAP)
1
Multimodal Airport Planning
RASP
Regional AviationStrategic Plan
SDCRAA (Authority)
AMAP
Airport MultimodalAccessibility Plan
SANDAG
2050 RTP
RegionalTransportation Plan
California SenateBill 10
Promote long-rangeplanning
Enhance regionalcooperation
Ensure consistencybetween Authority and
SANDAG decisions
Senate Bill 10 – Multimodal Planning to be Coordinated by SDCRAA and SANDAG
1
2
Project OverviewRegional Aviation Strategic Plan (RASP)
3-Phase Work Plan
Stakeholder and public outreach
Task-specific documentation and deliverables
Phase 1
Data Gathering andModel Development
Spring -Winter 2009
Phase 2
Evaluation of
Concepts and
Strategies
Spring -Summer 2010
Phase 3
Regional Aviation
Strategic Plan
Fall 2010 -Spring 2011
2
3 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee
January 11, 2011
RASP Study Area
12 Public Use Airports Located in a Densely Populated and Developed Region
Notes: Tijuana Int. Airport not located in San Diego County.
Military facilities are excluded from the RASP.
3
4 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee
January 11, 2011
Note: T ijuana International Airport not located in San Diego County.
Strategic Assessment Findings
Airports That Should be Considered For Additional Uses/Opportunities
4
5 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee
January 11, 2011
Note: T ijuana International Airport not located in San Diego County.
Strategic Assessment Findings
Airports That May be Considered For Additional Uses/Opportunities
5
6 Regional Aviation Strategic Plan • RASP Board Committee
January 11, 2011
Note: T ijuana International Airport not located in San Diego County.
Strategic Assessment Findings
Airports That Should Not be Considered For Additional Uses/Opportunities
6
7
1. Commercial Passenger Optimization
A. Full build-out of the ITC and north side terminalat San Diego International
B. Preserve SDIA airfield capacity for commercial
service
C. Enhance commercial passenger service atMcClellan-Palomar Airport
D. Introduce commercial passenger service atBrown Field
E. Up-gauge SDIA’s Fleet Mix –Narrow-body
Fleet
F. Up-gauge SDIA’s Fleet Mix – Increased Wide-body Fleet
2. Enhanced Utilization of Tijuana
A. Tijuana Rodriguez International Airport focus
on commercial service
B. Aviation passenger cross border facility(currently proposed)
C. Cross border airport terminal
Alternative Scenarios
3. California High Speed Rail
Stations at downtown LA, ONT Airport and:
A. Station at downtown San Diego
B. Station at SDIA
4. General Aviation Optimization
A. Enhance McClellan-Palomar Airport for high-end / corporate general aviation
B. Enhance Brown Field for high-end / corporategeneral aviation
C. Enhance Gillespie Field for mix-use generalaviation
5. Air Cargo Optimization
A. Introducecargo service at Brown Field
15 Scenarios Considered; 13 Subject to Technical Evaluation
7
8
Evaluation Matrix Compares Scenario Costs andBenefits
+ 1B
Esti
mate
d s
cen
ari
o c
ost ($
mill
ions)
Intermodal Transit Center (ITC) andnorth side terminal at SDIA (1A)
Demand accommodated over the “Do-nothing” Scenario in 2030(million enplaned passengers)
Scenario Families
1. Commercial Passenger (Airline) Optimization
2. Enhanced Utilization of Tijuana
3. California High Speed Rail
4. General Aviation Optimization
HSR station located at SDIA ordowntown San Diego (3A/B)
Cross Border Facility /pedestrian bridge (2B)
Cross BorderAirport Terminal (2C)
Enhance bordercrossings (2A)
Enhance McClellan-Palomarfor passenger service (1C)
Dedicate Gillespie Field formixed-use general aviation (4C)
Dedicate Frown Field forhigh-end general aviation (4B)
Dedicate McClel lan-Palomar tohigh-end general aviation (4A)
Dedicate SDIA to passengeraircraft operations only (1B)or require airlines to up-gauge their fleet mixes (1E)
9
1.All reasonable ideas and concepts were evaluated
2.The passenger capacity of San Diego Internationalcan only marginally be improved
3.Regional airport improvements are possible
4.No single entity in the region can unilaterallyimplement RASP findings
5.RASP included significant stakeholder / technicalcontributions
RASP Summary Considerations
9
10
RASP Next Steps / More Information
10
• Draft RASP Technical Report availablefor review and input at:www.sdrasp.com
• Input can be emailed to:[email protected]
• SDCRAA Board to accept RASPFindings At March 2011 Meeting
11
Stakeholder and public outreach
Project Overview –Airport Multimodal Accessibility Plan (AMAP)
Phase 1
High-Speed TrainConnections
Phase 2
Transit and
Roadway
Improvements
Phase 3
Airport Multimodal
Accessibility Plan
(AMAP)
11
12
High-Speed TrainConnections
LA to SD via InlandEmpire Section
– Ontario International
– March ARB
– San BernardinoInternational connection
San Diego IntermodalTransportation Center(ITC)
Future extension toCross Border Facility/Tijuana International
12
14
AMAP Proposed Ground Access Improvements
San Diego International Airport
•Airport Intermodal TransportationCenter
Gillespie Field
• Intersection Improvements atMarshall Ave
•Future BRT Modifications•Future Relocated Gillespie FieldLight Rail Station
Cross Border Facil ity
McClel lan-Palomar Airport
•Ramp Improvements at SR 905and Britannia Blvd
•Local Bus Connections•Direct Bus Service•Future High-Speed Train
•Palomar Airport Rd Widening•Owens Ave and Camino VidaRobles Arterial Improvements
•Local Bus Service to PoinsettiaCOASTER Station
15
Direct Transit Service(“FlyAway”)
To SDIA from:
I-15 Corridor
I-5 North Coast
To Cross Border Facility from:
I-15 Corridor
Airport ITC
H Street Trolley Station
15
16
AMAP Next Steps
Additional Stakeholder Outreach
Ground Access Improvements
– Transportation Modeling (underway)
– Cost Estimates (underway)
2050 Regional Transportation Plan
– Aviation Forecasts (complete)
– RASP and AMAP Findings (underway)
– Aviation/Ground Access Section of Draft (underway)
Draft/Final Report
16
18
2050 RTP Process and Timeline
RevenueProjections
ProjectEvaluation
Criteria
NetworkDevelopment
All Modes
PlanPerformance
Measures
RankedProjects byCategory
ApplyPerformance
Measures
Spring 2010 Fall 2009 Summer 2010 Fall 2010 Spring 2011
2050RegionalGrowth
Forecast
Goalsand
ObjectivesRevenue
Constrained/SCS Preferred
NetworkScenario
Draft2050 RTPand EIR
RevenueConstrained/SCS Network
Scenarios
Unconstrained Network