AI f
THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT: A STUDY IN AMERICAN
RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM
THESIS
Presented to the Graduate Council of the
North Texas State University in Partial
Fulfillment of the Requirements
For the Degree of
MASTER OF ARTS
By
Thomas John Ferris, B.A.
Denton, Texas
August, 1963
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cha
I
tpter
I. INTRODUCTIONCTIO.0...0. 0 . . ... ..
II. BILLY JAMES HARGIS AND THE CHRISTIAN CRUSADE
II. EDGAR C. BUNDY AND THE CHURCH LEAGUE OFAMERICA -.-0.*.*.0.0.*.0.0.0.0.0.*.0.0.0.0.9
IV. CARL McINTIRE AND THE AMERICAN COUNCIL OFCHRISTIAN CHURCHES .*.,*..*,0.0***0
V. CONCLUSION . . * . . , . * . . . * . . , . .
Page
1
15
54
97
119
APPENDIX . . . . . 0 . . . 0 . 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125
BIBLIOGRAPHY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ** . . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 139
iii
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Conservatism in America declined during the 1930's,
then in the post-war years began to revive in what has been
termed a "wonder"l and the most surprising development of
the post-war period. Yet an even more surprising develop-
ment has been the re-emergence of an important American
phenomenon within conservatism: the far right.3 Far right
activities gained national attention during the McCarthy
era, and again in 1960 as a result of the controversy over
the Air Reserve Center Training Manual, the San Francisco
student riots against the House Un-American Activities
Committee (HUAC), the possibility of a young liberal Roman
Catholic's becoming president of the United States, and
1Clinton Rossiter, Conservatism in America: The ThanklessPersuasion (New York, 1962), pp. 3-4.~~Rossiter epTains thetrend of the 1950's as "creeping conservatism" rather than"creeping socialism."
2Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Politics of Hope (Boston,1962), p. 72.
3Donald Janson and Bernard Eismann, The Far Right (NewYork, 1963), pp. ix, 1-10; Rossiter, Conservatis in America,pp. 166-170, Synonyms for "far right" include: ultra-conservative, ultra-rightist, rightist, and radical right.Far-rightists themselves label those who do not share theirposition as liberals, leftists, or ultra-leftists. Thoughdangers are involved, labeling is merely a recognition thatideas, programs, and activities do fall into certaincategories which are then assigned a descriptive name.
1
2
the alarm that President Eisenhower would soon retire from
public life.4
Of the more than two thousand ultra-conservative organi-
zations in operation in the post-war period,5 three will be
examined in detail to determine their origin and history,
views, personalities, goals and methods of operation. These
are Billy James Hargis and the Christian Crusade (CC), Edgar
C. Bundy and the Church League of America (CLA), and Carl
McIntire and the American Council of Christian Churches
(ACCC). Two factors were considered in selecting them: each
claims to be fundamentalist in religion, and each is signif-
icantly active on a national scale. They are regarded by
Louis Cassels, religious editor of United Press International,
as the "big wheels" of the religious right.
4New York Times, March 28, 1960, p. 1; Eugene V. Schnei-der, "The Radical Right," Nation, CXCIII (September 30, 1961)202; Fred J. Cook, "The Ultr 7 Nation, CXCIV (June 30, 1963 ,570.
5Betty E. Chmaj, "Paranoid Patriotism," The Atlantic, CCX(November, 1962), 91, citing New York Times, December, 1961.
6 Louis Cassels, "The Rightist Crisis in Our Churches,"Look, XXVI (April 24, 1962), 46. The Anti-Defamation Leagueof B'nai Bt rith considers Christian Crusade "among the threeor four most important organizations on tiie ultra-right."Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, Facts, Rev. BillyJames Hargis: The Christian Crusade (New York, 19627,pp. 229, 231. Rossiter considers Bundy's and McIntire'sactivities to be "so harsh and malevolent" that they may beconsidered fellow travelers of Fascism; they are "out-agitatingthe Left in providing 'the dynamic of dissent' in America to-day!" Their dissent, according to Columbia Universityhistorian Richard Hofstadter, is not as powerful as that ofthe liberals in the thirties, but it does affect politicallife and causes a "kind of punitive reaction" throughout thenation. Rossiter, Conservatism in America, pp. 171-172.
3
Unifying characteristics of ultra-conservative organiza-
tions are their opposition to Communism and their conspira-
torial view of society. To them the fight against Communism
is merely another phase of Satan's ancient conspiracy against
the church; the battle between freedom and Communism is
actually a battle between good and evil, Christ and anti-Christ.
This conspiracy has evidenced itself in a number of ways.
For example, during World War I the American " 10 0 per centers"
saw a conspiracy by the German-Americans to poison American
soldiers by putting ground glass in their food. Now some
among the contemporary ultra-conservatives see the same kind
of conspiracy to poison the American people through adulter-
ated Polish hams and the use of fluorides and bromides in
foods.7 Rather than viewing the current upsurge in the
Negroes' desire for equality as a natural process, the far
right sees it as a plot by the Communists to disrupt harmo-
nious race relations. China's fall to the Communists was not
due to her internal problems, but is seen as a plot by the
State Department. Indeed, these small plots are only ex-
pressions of the eternal, international plot which through
the ages has borne the name of Jew, Catholic, or Communist,
with Satan behind each. If the plot can be exposed, the
7John Higham, Strangers in the Land: Patterns ofAmerican Nativism 18-1925(New York, 1963), p. 207;Christian Beacon, August 2, 1962, pp. 2, 4. The ChristianBeacon is published weekly at Collingswood, New Jersey.
4
ultra-conservative reasons, life will return to peace and
order.8
The ultra-conservative is considered apart from the
conservative in that he generally desires to remake America's
institutions and eliminate from American political and in-
tellectual life anyone who differs from his value system.9
He is defined by Clinton Rossiter as one who is a "mixture
of sober conservativism, timid standpattism, and angry re-
action (a mixture rendered even more extraordinary by a
careless penchant for radical methods))."10
The rightist classifies an individual on the basis of
his attitude toward Communism: "hard" or "soft." To the
rightist a liberal cannot be anti-Communist, because he is
"soft" on Communism. A person is "soft" if he insists that
there is little danger from Communism internally, while a
"hard" anti-Communist makes no distinction between the dangers
of domestic and international Communism. One who is "hard"
usually believes that the threat from domestic Communism is
even greater than that from international Communism. Even
though domestic Communism is small in its numerical strength
8 Billy James Hargis, What's Wrong with Jesus? (Tulsa,[n.dj); Christian Beacon, May 21, 1963, pp. 1-8; Schneider,"The Radical Right,"pT200; News & Views, December, 1962,pp. 1-6. News & Views is published monthly at Wheaton,Illinois.
9Seymour Martin Lipset, "The Sources of the 'RadicalRight,"' The New American Right, edited by Daniel Bell (NewYork, 1955)~ pp~ 166-167.
10Rossiter, Conservatism in America, p. 170.
5
it is still considered an extreme danger, for the ultra-
conservative believes that Red infiltration has been successful
in every major institution in American society.11
Since Communism is considered by the ultra-conservative
as morally evil, he gladly supports organizations formed to
combat it. As de Tocqueville observed a century ago, forming
new organizations is an old American custom.12 Before the
Civil War, organizations were formed to rid the country of
the alleged un-American tendencies of the Catholic and the
immigrant. The most important of these was the American
Party of the 1850's, commonly known as the Know-Nothing Party.
Its goal was the exclusion of Roman Catholics from politics.13
As a result of its controversy with the Catholics, a perma-
nent scar of the Know-Nothing movement may be seen at the
153-foot level of the Washington Monument. When they
learned that the Pope had sent a gift block of marble to be
used in constructing a monument to George Washington, the
Know-Nothings broke into the construction ground, destroyed
the plans, and dumped all the marble into the Potomac. When
work on the monument was resumed 25 years later, the color
lDaniel Bell, "Interpretations of American Politics,"The New American , edited by Daniel Bell (New York,1955 7pp.22-25.
12Lipset, "The Sources of the 'Radical Right,'" p. 181.
13Lipset, "The Sources of the 'Radical Right,t" p. 169;Gustavus Myers, History of Bigotry in the United States (NewYork 1960), pp. 129-163;~Higham, Strangers in the Land,pp. 4, 6-7.
6
of the original 153 feet of marble could not be dupli-
cated.14
Another organization arose in the 1880's, taking the
place of the then-defunct Know-Nothings, to protect American
society against what was thought to be a foreign enemy. The
American Protective Association (APA), founded by Henry F.
Bowers in 1887 at Clinton, Iowa, had as its central purpose
opposition to Catholicism, restriction of immigration, and
preservation of the public school system from Catholic
subversion. A representative pamphlet of the APA was George
P. Gifford's Our Republic in Danger--A Clarion C g to the
Rescue, which stated that there was a "Romanist" movement
afoot to overthrow the schools. This movement was supported
by the Roman Catholic hierarchy, considered by Gifford "a
separate political government, despotic, tyrannic, absolute
and anti-republican." It was always, Gifford wrote, "seek-
ing international conquests." The APA called for freedom-
loving Americans to rise up and oppose the Catholics. Even
Abraham Lincoln's assassination was considered by the APA a
"Catholic plot."15
Another 100 per cent American organization, the Invisi-
ble Empire of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK), came
14Richard Dudman, Men of the Far h (New York, 1962),pp. 14-15.
15Myers, Histor of iotry, pp. 163-192, citing OurRepublic in Danger; Liple ,"he Sources of the 'RadicaTRight,'" pp.169-170; Higham, Strangers in the Land,pp. 62-63, 80-87, 108.
7
into being in Atlanta, Georgia on October 16, 1915. Organ-
ized by William J. Simmons, it was dedicated to upholding
Americanism, propagating Protestant Christianity, and
guaranteeing white supremacy. Although there were KKK
persecutions of the Jew and Negro, by the middle of 1921
the Klan began to specialize in disciplining the white
person--the Catholic, in particular. By 1922 its mission
was defined by Edward Clark, a KKK publicity agent, as "one
of creating national solidarity by protecting 'the interest
of those whose forefathers established the nation."16 The
Klan found itself fighting anything and anyone who might be
considered a subversive enemy of what the KKK defined as
the traditional American way.17
The most radical racist organizations on the extreme
fringe of fundamentalism in the thirties and forties were
William Dudley Pelley and his Silver Shirts (also known as
Christian American Patriots); Gerald Winrod and his De-
fenders of the Christian Faith; and Gerald L. K. Smith and
his Christian Nationalist Crusade. Their racist views against
Negroes and Jews were not held by fundamentalism in general.18
1 6 Higham, Strangers in the Land, p. 291.
17Higham, Strangers in the Land, pp. 285-299, 327-329;Lipse t, "The Sources of tHei Tadical Right,'" pp. 170-172;Myers, History 2f Bigotry, pp. 211-276.
18 For an extended discussion of these and other extremeright-wing organizations from the thirties to the present,see Ralph Lord Roy, Apostles of Discord (Boston, 1953).
8
Joseph McCarthy, the late Senator from Wisconsin, by
his charges of Communist infiltration of the United States
government and all phases of American society, became a
rallying point for the ultra-conservatives. The enemy had
been the Catholic, the Jew, the foreigner; now the conspiracy
against the American way of life was being plotted by the
Communists.
McCarthy began his anti-Communist career while still a
relatively unknown first-term senator. On February 9, 1950
at Wheeling, West Virginia, he made the now-famous speech
in which he stated that he had in his hand a list of the
names of Communist Party members and fellow travelers
working in the State Department. 1 9 Unlike the Know-Nothings,
the APA, and the KKK, McCarthy did not center his attacks on
minority groups, but on the Easterners, the Harvard-Yale
men, and the intellectuals. It was they, the Middlewestern
Senator said, "the bright young men who are born with silver
spoons in their mouths," who betrayed America. From that
day to this, the question of the internal threat of Communism
has been the main theme of ultra-conservatism in America.20
In the early years of the movement fundamentalism did
not react to Communism by forming organizations devoted
19The number of names was either 207 or 57. Eric F.Goldman, The Crucial Decade--and After: America, 1945-1960,(New York,~1961), pp. 141-1437
20Lipset, "The Sources of the 'Radical Right,'" pp. 209-214; Myers, History of Bigotry, pp. 448-460; David A. Shannon,The Decline of American Communism, Communism in Americal Life,e-dited by linton Rossiter (New York, 1959), pp. 188-189.
9
exclusively to fighting it. Whatever fundamentalist oppo-
sition there was to Communism is found only in individual
expressions such as the statement by Dwight L. Moody, a
forefather of fundamentalism and a revivalist of the late
nineteenth century, concerning the labor unrest in Chicago
in the 1880's: "Either these people are to be evangelized or
the leaven of communism and infidelity will assume such
enormous proportions that it will break out in a reign of
terror such as this country has never known."21 Billy
Sunday, controversial evangelist of the early twentieth
century, said: "If I had my way with these ornery wild-eyed
Socialists and I.W.W.'s I would stand them up before a
firing squad."2 2
As concerned as was Moody and as radical as was Sunday,
neither formed organizations to combat liberalism, Socialism,
or Communism. Such a phenomenon developed only after World
War II, and split the ranks of the movement. For example,
Bundy and McIntire believe that Billy Graham, widely known
evangelist in the post-World War II period, is aiding the
cause of Communism by his association with the National
Council of Churches and his endorsement of the Russian
Baptist leaders, whom Bundy and McIntire consider "tools and
21Cited by James Findlay, "Moody, 'Gapmen,' and theGospel: The Early Days of Moody Bible Institute," ChurchHistory, XXXI (September, 1962), 324.
22Cited by William E. Leuchtenburg, The Perils of Pros-perity, 1914-2, The Chicago History of American Cvilization,edited by~Daniel J. Boorstin (Chicago, 1958), p. 66.
10
agents of the Kremlin." 23 Those like Hargis, Bundy, and
McIntire, who see liberalism, Socialism, and Communism as
three partners in subverting the American way, are intensely
critical of the moderate fundamentalist who fails to join
them in their fight to save America. Yet a survey of the
origins of fundamentalism would indicate that it is the far
right wing of the movement which is doing violence to some
of its basic tenets.
American Protestantism has been historically conserva-
tive in its political, economic, and religious views.24
Within Protestantism, fundamentalism, an early twentieth
century movement, is generally even more conservative. To
the far right within religious fundamentalism is a group
which has welded its theological views to its political-
economic views so completely that they desire the term
"fundamentalist" to mean one who accepts the fundamental
teachings of the Bible as literally interpreted and the
fundamental political-economic principles upon which they
believe this country was founded.2 5 A desire to alter this
23Carl McIntire, "Billy Graham," a report reproduced byCLA from Christian Beacon, October 27, 1960.
24Findlay, "Moody, 'Gapmen, ' and the Gospel," p. 325.Clinton Rossiter's thesis is that most conservatives areChristians. These conservatives believe that man has a sinnature and therefore government legislation cannot cure hisproblems, for they are essentially spiritual in nature.Society must be in harmony with God in religious, political,and economic absolutes. Rossiter, Conservatism in America,pp. 21-22, 35, 43-44, 46, 54, 228-229, 269-272, M-283.
25New York Times, March 28, 1960, p. 28.
11
religious, political, and economic framework envisioned by
the far right fundamentalist is stigmatized as aiding and
abetting Communism.
By friend and foe alike, fundamentalism is considered
to have originated and grown as a manifestation of reaction.
During the latter part of the nineteenth century a movement
began within American Protestantism to encourage Christians
to bring society into harmony with the Bible's teachings,
whereas previously only the individual had been the goal of
evangelism. This new attempt to build an ideal Christian
society was called the "social gospel." Walter Rauschen-
busch, whose Christianity and Social Crises was published
in 1907, was its chief leader and exponent.26
In science and philosophy, naturalism and rationalism
questioned the historical source of authority for Protestant-
ism--the Bible. The traditional Genesis record of the
creation of the universe and man began to be discarded when
Charles Darwints theory of evolution was applied to theo-
logical thought. When evolutionary principles were applied
to the origins of the books of the Bible, the result was a
rejection or modification of the commonly accepted author-
ship and dates of many biblical books, thus further weakening
or destroying traditional biblical authority.
Within virtually every major denomination, a controversy
developed over which view would prevail: the new or the old.
26 Kenneth Scott Latourette, A History of Christianity(New York, 1953), p. 1264.
12
Those holding the old position wanted the modernists,
liberals, or apostates (as they were to be named) expelled.
Reactionary movements to conserve the old fundamental views
soon manifested themselves in the form of Bible conferences,
mass evangelism, educational institutions, and publications. 27
Although one of the first Bible conferences was held as
early as 1878 in the Church of the Holy Trinity (Episcopal)
in New York City, the Niagara Bible Conference of 1895 is
considered the most significant, for its delegates formu-
lated what they felt to be the irreducible statement of
Christian belief: (1).the inerrancy of the scriptures; (2)
the deity of Christ; (3) the virgin birth of Christ; (4)
the substitutionary atonement of Cnrist; and (5) the
physical resurrection and personal return of Christ.28
Many consider the formal beginning of the fundamentalist
movement to be between 1909 and 1912, with the publication
of a series of twelve paperbacks entitled The Fundamental..
A Tesmon to the Truth. Two California oil millionaires,
the Stewart brothers, provided $300,000 for the free distri-
bution of the volumes to every pastor, evangelist, missionary,
27Norman F. Furniss, The Fundamentalist Controversy,1918-_931 (New Haven, 19547~pp. 103-176 andStewartG.
e History of Fundamentalism (New York, 1931), pp. 64-225.Both these works give a detailed description of the contro-versy from 1919 into the thirties and the resulting.loss ofleadership by the fundamentalists.
28Furniss, The Fundamentalist Controversy, pp. 13, 184;Cole, History of~Fundamentalism, p.3L.
13
theological student, Sunday School superintendent, YMCA and
YWCA secretary in the English-speaking world. Over three
million copies were distributed in this manner, describing
and defending the controversial fundamentals.2 9 The
Stewarts' money also founded the Bible Institute of Los
Angeles in.1908, a sister school to Chicagots Moody Bible
Institute founded twenty years earlier. In 1917 the Los
Angeles school republished The Fundamentals, reduced to four
volumes, and on its jubilee anniversary in 1958 again
published it in two volumes entitled The Fundamentals for
Today. The most recent edition, 1962, is in one volume.3 0
Though the phrase "the fundamentals" dates back to
1909, the term "fundamentalist" was not coined until 1920
by Charles Laws, editor of the Watchman-Examiner, in his
editorial, "Tampering with the Mainspring."3 1 Fundamental-
ists, then, consider themselves members of a theological
movement to conserve the fundamentals of the Christian faith,3 2
2 9Cole, History of Fundamentalism, pp. 52-61, 229; J. I.Packer, "Fundamentaligm" and the Word of God (Grand Rapids,1958), p. 28.
3 0 Charles L. Feinberg, editor, The Fundamentals forToday (Grand Rapids, 1962).
31Cole, History of Fundamentalism, p. 67; WilliamHordern, A Layman's Guide to Protestant Theology (New York,1959), p. 57.
32 John F. Walvoord, "What's Right about Fundamentalism,"Eternity, VIII (June, 1957), 6, 35; As a leader in the move-ment today, Walvoord traces its history and makes a plea toretain "fundamentalist" as a descriptive term. Edward J.Carnell, "Fundamentalism," A Handbook of Christian Theology,edited by Marvin Halverson TNew York, l~95FT, Pp. 142-144.
14
The Adventist and Pentecostal Holiness groups historically
are not considered to be fundamentalist.33
Although the fundamentalist controversy reached its
height by 1925 and ended in the early thirties, this does
not mean that fundamentalists are no longer active. They
are as active now, or more so, than they have ever been.
This activity, however, is carried on in and through organi-
zations which have been founded as a result of the contro-
versy. Their numerical total, which does not represent
their influence, is estimated to be close to five million.
The main stream of fundamentalism concerns itself with
religious evangelism and training, while its right wing
carries on political-economic activity. In doing this, the
far right wing is violating fundamentalism's original tenets,
which disallowed the application of its theology to society.35
33Hordern, A Layman's Guide, p. 75; Winthrop S. Hudson,American Protestantism, The-Ficago History of AmericanCivilization, edited by Daniel J. Boorstin (Chicago, 1961),p. 159.
34 Hudson, American Protestantism, pp. 156, 161, 187.
35Edwin Walhout, "The Liberal-Fundamentalist Debate,"Christianity Today, VII (March 1, 1963), 519-520; Edward J.Carnell, The Casefor Orthodox Theoly (Philadelphia,1959), pp.Tl~T'6~~CarneiTVIs a critic within the move-ment, critical of the term and the reactionaries as ex-emplified in the Scopes Trial and Carl McIntire's ChristianBeacon. An entire discussion of fundamentalism's failurein applying its theology to the society in which it livesmay be found in Carl F. H. Henry's The Uneasy Conscience ofModern Fundamentalism (Grand RapidsT~T947).
CHAPTER II
BILLY JAMES HARGIS AND THE
CHRISTIAN CRUSADE
Foremost among the far right leaders is Billy James
Hargis, key personality behind Christian Crusade and its
activities for the past fifteen years.
Born August 3, 1925 in Texarkana, Texas, Hargis was
graduated from a Texarkana high school in 1941. He then
spent a year and a half at the Ozark Bible College, Benton-
ville, Arkansas before quitting because of financial dif-
ficulties.1 Although claiming no educational attainments,
Hargis believes he knows "the mind of God and the mind of
the majority of the American people in their quest for
freedom." Indeed, in his opinion, he has the kind of edu-
cation that really counts: "36 years of education in the
university of hard knocks," giving him an ability to under-
stand the common man. Hargis makes it clear that he was not
born with a silver spoon in his mouth, as he states most
religious and political liberals were, nor does he look down
1 Billy James Hargis, Communist America: Must It Be?(Tulsa, 1960), pp. iv, v. Crusade literature says the OzarkBible College presently has over 200 students and has beenrelocated in Joplin, Missouri. Christian Crusade (January,1963), p. 13.
15
his nose, as they do, at anyone who has not graduated from
"one of their accepted [cc literature often refers to
Harvard] schools of learning."2
In a unique progression, the Tulsa evangelist received
an honorary Doctor of Divinity degree in 1954 from the
Defender Seminary, Puerto Rico; a Bachelor of Arts in 1956
and a Bachelor of Theology in 1958, both from Burton College
and Seminary, Manitou, Colorado. In 1957 he received an
honorary Doctor of Laws from Belin Memorial University,
Chillicothe, Missouri, and in 1961 another honorary Doctor
of Laws from Bob Jones University, Greenville, South
Carolina.3
Hargis feels he is being smeared by "the liberal press
and their duped allies" when they speak of his degrees as
coming from diploma mills, even though Burton College and
Seminary and Belin Memorial University are so listed by the
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Hargis disa-
grees with the HEW, pointing out that he attended classes at
Burton in the summers of 1957 and 1958, and completed a
thesis and residence requirements before receiving his degree.
Crusade literature asserts that "thousands" of ministers have
2The Weekly Crusader, March 9, 1962, p. 7. Most Crusadepublicity describes Hargis as the possessor of a B.A., Th.B.,D.D., and LL.D. The Weekly Crusader is published at Tulsa.
3Hargis, Communist America, pp. iv, v ChristianCrusade (July, 1957),P . 5, (January, 1963),TP.13.e-fender Seminary was founded by Gerald Winrod in 1946; thehonorary degree seems to be his only association with Hargis.Ralph Lord Roy, Apostles of Discord (Boston, 1953), p. 46.
16
17
received their degrees from Burton, including Harlan O'Dell,
onetime pastor of former Vice-President Richard M. Nixon.
Furthermore, Hargis says, it is "not only false, but un-
Christian" to attempt to link him with Clyde Belin, sentenced
in 1959 to one year in federal prison for using the mails to
defraud persons by inducing them to attend Belin University,
and for making false and fraudulent claims in University
bulletins. Hargis asks, "How would he . . . know that the
school would be closed within a ..* . few years and that its
President would be convicted on a criminal charge?"4
Hargis is a fundamentalist minister who was ordained
at the Rose Hill Christian Church (Disciples of Christ),
Texarkana, Texas. He began pastoring the First Christian
Church, Sapulpa, Oklahoma in 1946 and resigned in 1950 to
give his "full time to this inter-denominational fight
against Communism."5 He regularly speaks in local churches,
often holding week-long anti-Communist conferences in them.
His fundamentalist theology is a vital part of his fight
against Communism, for he says, "Show me a country where
Christian orthodoxy is prevalent and I will show you an area
where the Communists do not have a chance." He points out
in his literature that he has never met a preacher "who
4Christian Crusade (January, 1963), p. 13. See also"The Scandal of Bogus Degrees," Chri(tianity Today, IV(May 9, 1960), 664-666.
5Hargis, Communist America, p. v; Undated letter fromHargis to "Frienids"The W Crusader, March 2, 1962,pp. 7-8.
18
classed himself a fundamentalist, who belonged to a
Communist front-organization." Of the 7,000 Protestant
clergymen J. B. Matthews, former chief counsel for the House
Un-American Activities Committee, listed as belonging to
Communist-front organizations in the thirties, forties, and
fifties, Hargis says he knows of none who were fundamental-
ists.6
Turning to the organization itself, Christian Crusade's
main thesis is that every agency and institution of society
has been infiltrated by or is unknowingly aiding Communism.
The danger is now so great that within the lifetime of the
present generation America will become a "slave labor camp"
as a republic in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
This problem can be solved, CC says, "if God's people" will
immediately and actively aid in cleaning up Communism "in-
ternally"; only then America's problem with Communism "in-
ternationally will be solved."7 Its attempt to aid "God's
people" has involved the Crusade in what it calls a "grass-
roots educational and political activity," using every means
of mass communication available.8
6The We Crusader, March 2, 1962, p. 7; Billy James
Hargis,~What's Wrong with Jesus? (Tulsa, [n.d.3).7Christian Crusade (December, 1962), p. 1; Billy James
Hargis, What's Wrong with America? (Tulsa, [n.d.)), p. 1.
8Billy James Hargis, American Socialism...Moving America
Downhill (Tulsa, [n.d.J ), p. 16; Anti-Defamation League ofB'nai B'rith, Facts, Rev. Billy James Hargis: The ChristianCrusade (New York, 1962j, p. 237.
19
The objectives of Christian Crusade as officially
stated in its literature are:
To safeguard and protect the Christian ideals uponwhich America was founded;
To preserve the cherished freedoms which are theheritage of every American;
To stimulate Biblical Christianity in our churchesand homes;
To strive for sound pro-American education in thenation's schools and colleges;
To eradicate Marxism and Collectivism from ourchurches, schools and national life;
To combat militantly and aggressively, and toexpose publicly, any person or organization whose wordsor actions inculcate leftist, socialist or communistphilosophies or aims, intentionally or otherwise, into!an phase of American life.
CC desires that these objectives will result in "all
good Americans" favoring:
Greatly reduced taxes, through cutting governmentspending to the bone and through eliminating boon-doggling bureaucrats;
A sound dollar, so that our money, insurancepolicies and pensions will retain their purchasingpower;
Maintaining the sovereignty of the United States;Elimination of foreign aid except for American
military purposes;Getting the government out of all business which
can be conducted by private enterprise;A Supreme Court that fulfills its sworn duty to
uphold the Constitution;Reducing the power the federal government has
usurped and returning to the states their constitutionalrights;
Severence of diplomatic relationship with godlessCommunist countries;
Teaching the youth of our land patriotism, soundeconomics and time-honored virtues;
Every effort, short of actual war, to liberate thecaptive nations from Soviet Imperialism#
and "all good Americans" opposing:
Confiscatory taxation, federal extravagance, waste,and give-away programs;
20
Inflation of all kinds, including the wage-pricespiral, printing-press money, etc.;
Attempts to buy friendship; and the supporting ofpro-communist, socialist governments at the expense ofAmerican taxpayers;
Legislation by the Judiciary, and misinterpretationand evasion of the Constitution;
All government officials and candidates who aresocialist, "liberals," welfare-statists, one worlders;
Communism and Socialism in every form, includinggovernment ownership, operation, or competition withprivate business;
Federal interference in schools, housing, voting,and other matters constitutionally belonging to thestates;
Socialist and pro-communist teachings and teachersin the nation's schools and colleges;
Abandonment of the 150 million people whom ourgovernment, through leftist pressure, surrendered toatheistic Communism.
In the years 1948-1949, the activities of CC were
centered in local evangelistic preaching, weekly radio
broadcasts, and an eight-page magazine occasionally published
on the subject of the "apostasy" of many Protestant pastors
in their attempt to "socialize" the biblical teachings of
Christianity. The elimination of Communism from American
society was not one of its original goals. From 1950-1952
radio broadcasting became daily, evangelistic preaching
increased in the Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas area, and
circulation of the Crusade's magazine grew. Tracts and
pamphlets were distributed, which Crusade literature says
exposed the "depth of penetration of socialistic and commu-
nistic ideologies into American life."11 In 1951 this
9Billy James Hargis, A Call to Action to Every RealAmerican (Tulsa, [n.d.]), ppT-3.
10Billy James Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade(Tulsa, [n.d.J ), p. 2.
21
organization was incorporated in Sapulpa, Oklahoma as
Christian Echoes Ministry, Inc., and in 1952 took its present
official corporate name of Christian Echoes National Minis-
try, Inc.11
From 1952 to the present, there have been four events
which focused national attention on CC; each in turn was
considered by the Crusade the most important happening to
date.12 CC gained international attention, its literature
reports, when Hargis became director of the Bible Balloon
Project of the International Council of Christian Churches
(ICCC).13 Prompted by refugees from Eastern Europe who
reported a severe shortage of Bibles, delegates to the 1952
British Isles regional meeting of the ICCC decided to send
gas-filled balloons carrying portions of the Bible to Iron
Curtain countries. After receiving President Eisenhower's
blessings and State Department approval, the CC leader
released 5,000 balloons from Nuremberg, Germany on September 4,
1953.14 Before the project ended in 1958, Hargis visited
Europe 5 times and launched over 1,000,000 Bible portions.
1 15ee Appendix A for a list of the National AdvisoryCommittee of Christian Crusade.
121952-1958, Bible Balloon Project; 1960, Air ReserveCenter Traning Manual; 1962, National Anti-Communist Leader-ship School; 1963, OPERATION: MIDNIGHT RIDE.
13The ICCC was founded by Carl McIntire in 1948 as acounter-force to the World Council of Churches.
14New York Times, August 6, 1961, p. 13; July 26, 1952,p. 14; August 3l,71953, p. 6; September 5, 1953, p. 18.
22
CC backers were the principal financiers of the project,1 5
which Pete White, CC public relations director, considered
a key weapon against the Communists and one of the causes of
the Hungarian Revolt of 1956.16
In 1957, on one of his overseas trips in connection
with the balloon project, Hargis met with Generalissimo and
Madame Chiang Kai-shek of China and President Syngman Rhee
of South Korea. These three "world Christian leaders in the
fight against Communism" told Hargis that the failure of
President Truman and the State Department to send military
aid to China caused the Communist takeover there. They also
warned Hargis that aid to neutrals is aid to the Communist
cause. Hargis reports that he left the Far East realizing
he must intensify his anti-Communist activities in America.1 7
This activity now became the Crusade's purpose. Upon Hargis'
return to America, CC launched a nation-wide "Christian
Conscience Crusade" to report his findings and awaken the
American public.18
CC intensified its nation-wide campaign in 1958 by
holding an eight-hour anti-Communist "radio marathon"
15Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade, p. 2.
16Pete White, "Bibles from the Sky.," American Mercury,
LXXXV (April, 1957), 91.
17Billy James Hargis, "Three Christian Giants in aWorld of Dwarfs," American Mercury, LXXXV (December, 1957),14-20.
18 Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade, p. 3.
23
broadcast featuring, its literature claims, many of the
nation's outstanding Christian conservatives. The theme was
"Communism Shall Not Win." 1 9 The following year another
nation-wide "Save America--for God and Our Children" crusade
took place, and the organization held a national convention
in Tulsa. CC expanded extensively throughout 1959 in
preparation for a dramatic impact on the nation in 1960.
In keeping with this expansion, Hargis began to broaden his
anti-Communist efforts by participating in other anti-
Communist movements and, in 1959, became the first minister
to be elected president of "We the People.," a national
coalition of conservative voters claiming membership in
every state in the Union.20
As its initial impact in 1960, CC purchased property
in Tulsa for its future international headquarters and
"Memorial Chapel and a National Liberty Museum." A second
eight-hour "radio marathon" was held on the subject "America
Deserves to Know," with over twenty of "America's great
Christian patriots,"21 and the second annual Christian
Summit Conference took place in Tulsa.22 Also in 1960, CC
became embroiled in a national controversy when material
19Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade, p. 3,20New York Times, September 16, 1961, p. 8; Sep-
tember 1 T96T, p. 26.
21Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade, p. 4.
22Christian Crusade (December, 1962), p. 10.
24
from two of its pamphlets appeared in tne Air Reserve Center
Training Manual. This controversy proved quite profitable
to CC, Pete White says, for it moved the organization onto
the national scene.2 3
In 1962, Hargis held the First National Anti-Communist
Leadership School at the Mayo Hotel in Tulsa, Oklahoma,
January 29 to February 2. During these five days several
hundred conservatives from across the United States attended
to hear "noted" speakers on anti-Communism. A few of the
speakers attracted unfavorable attention to CC because of
their anti-Negro, anti-Semitic, and anti-Catholic statements.
Hargis said he was annoyed by these statements because of
the presence of reporters from the major television networks,
the New York Times, Time, Life, the Saturday Eve Post,
and Nation, but felt he could not censor any of the speeches
since that would be a denial of academic freedom. One
speaker in particular, Revilo P. Oliver, professor of classics
at the University of Illinois and a member of the John Birch
Society Council, was outspoken in racial matters. Oliver
assailed liberals as "witch doctors and fakers with a
sanctified itch to save the world," taxing Americans to death
for the benefit of the "mangy cannibal in Africa."2 4
23Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade, pp. 4-5.
24 Harold H. Martin, "Doomsday Merchant on the Far, Far
Right," Saturday Evening Post, CCXXXV (April 28, 1962), 22.
25
The National Anti-Communist Leadership School provided
CC its greatest amount of national news coverage up to that
time, and classified Hargis as one of the leading ultra-
conservative leaders in the country.25
The Crusade's educational activities were expanded in
1962 with the purchase of a hotel in Manitou Springs,
Colorado. The hotel, now named "The Summit," will serve as
a resort for Christians interested in vacationing in Colo-
rado and will house the CC Anti-Communist Youth University,
Former Congressman John Rousselot is to be Dean of the
University, at which classes will be held on "The Holy
Bible," "Christian Economics," "Free Enterprise System,"
"Constitutional Government Procedures," "Strategy and
Tactics of International Communism," and "How to Organize
Conservative Youth Groups on High School and College
Campuses.26
A new objective for CC was announced in December, 1962:
a "Christ-Centered Americanism Campaign," to run January 1,
1963 to December 31, 1964. During this two-year period
Hargis hopes to accomplish ten projects. Project One in-
cludes recruiting 100,000 official members for CC with
annual membership dues of $10 or $1,000 for a life membership.
25New York Times, January 21, 1962, p. 5; January 30,1962, p~~-1 ; January 31, 1962, p. 11; Thomas H. Uzzell, "BillyJames Hargis: A Pitch for God and Country," Nation, CXCIV(February 17, 1962), 140-142.
2 6 Billy James Hargis The Summit: Anti-Communist YouthUniverse (Tulsa, [n.d. S.
26
Being a member of CC will enable one to participate in
Project Two, a "Book-of-the-Quarter Club." Though there
are more than enough anti-Communist periodicals now availa-
ble, the book club will meet a supposed "dire need for
full-length conservative books." Those not interested in
official membership may become book club members for $10 a
year.
Project Three is a streamlining of the CC magazine, and
of The Weekly Crusader, which may be subscribed to for $10 a
year. Project Four calls for development of the Anti-
Communist Leadership School into an annual meeting. An
Anti-Communist University is Project Five.
The sixth project is, in Hargis' opinion, the "most
important goal": expansion of mass communications. Project
Seven is the development of Bible study groups in over 1,000
communities; Project Eight, the development of 1,000
Christian Crusade Fellowships as local anti-Communist study
groups. Project Nine sets aside the month of August as
Crusade members' fellowship month at The Summit. The annual
August CC convention, as part of the new campaign, will be
held in a different major city each year. The final project
is to publish a monthly suggestion in Christian Crusade as
to a specific course of action which Crusade members should
take in their respective communities; such actions as eradi-
cating Communist-made merchandise from local stores, en-
couraging the removal of "ultra-liberals" from the news media,
27
placing conservative books in public libraries, and en-
couraging the support of conservative merchants.27
In addition to its ten projects for 1963-1964, CC
carried out another "Save America" campaign in 1963, this
time inspired by Paul Revere, who also warned Americans of
impending danger. From February 27 to April 3, 1963 Billy
James Hargis and former Major General Edwin A. Walker
toured the nation from coast to coast "to alert the American
public to the enemy within and without," in what was termed
by CC as "the most important single project" it had under-
taken to date. The campaign was proclaimed as "OPERATION:
MIDNIGHT RIDE," Twenty-eight meetings were held in various
major cities, after which both Hargis and Walker termed the
campaign a complete success, Indeed, it was "undoubtedly
the most successful project in the history of Christian
Crusade. 128
In his "Save America" campaigns, Hargis is attempting
to save an America he believes is and always has been a
Christian nation. He believes the brave men and women who
2 7 Christian Crusade (December, 1962), entire issue;"Vital Information Concerning the Christ-Centered Ameri-canism Campaign," publication sheet included with CC's April1963 monthly mailing.
28Letter from Edwin A. Walker and Billy James Hargis toCC friends, April 5, 1963. The entire February and March1963 issues of Christian Crusade were devoted to "OPERATION:MIDNIGHT RIDE," giving the itinerary and reporting on thelectures. Hargis encouraged each member to secure copies ofthe lectures for $25. See also "The Far Right: Crusade andCollect," Newsweek, LXI (April 1, 1963), 21-22.
28
settled the wilderness did so with a "Bible under one arm
and a musket under the other"; they were ready to fight for
their faith and freedoms. Their intent, Hargis emphasizes,
was to establish a government where "God and Jesus Christ"
would be recognized, not a particular church or denomination.
In support of his position, Hargis cites the Plymouth Colony
Law for Education of Children, intended to teach them to read
the Bible; the 1643 New England Articles of Confederation,
which stated the purpose of colonization as the advancement
of the Gospel; the Declaration of Independence, claiming to
rely on divine providence; and the Thanksgiving Proclamation
of the Continental Congress on November 1, 1777, calling for
the spreading of the Kingdom of God. Hargis concludes that
the founders of America were courageous in acknowledging the
Bible as the source of truth and as a guidebook for the newly
created nation and its leaders. The Constitution of the
United States, he believes, mirrors the ideals of Christ.
To depart from the Constitution is to depart from Christ.29
America became a great nation because her people adhered
to and recognized the faith and ideals expressed by the
Founding Fathers. The freedoms they gave this country and
the republican form of government they established, however,
are being subverted, Hargis warns, by "Communism, through
its associates, liberalism, progressivism, socialism, and
modernism." The "so-called social crises" were created by
29Hargis, Communist America, pp. 31-35.
29
these groups; they are "destroying love of country, per-
verting morals of young and old, casting aside beloved
traditions, banning the Bible" from schools. The effect of
all this is to reduce the once proud individualistic American
citizen to an "insignificant helpless, hopeless pawn of
giant government," 3 0
Because he believes Americans do not want to depart
from the Christian ideals of the Pilgrims, Hargis has called
for a Congressional declaration "reaffirming" belief in the
"Christian principles of the Founding Fathers"; dependence
on "divine providence"; and a statement that separation of
church and state does not mean separation of God from
government, but merely that there will be no governmental
recognition of any religious group or any prohibiting of the
freedom to exercise religious faith and practice.31
Hargis is not surprised when people mention to him that
they were not aware of the extent of Communist infiltration
into American society as reported by CC. He asks, "How
could they know," when most of "America's daily newspapers
are promoting the Communist Line." In too many cases, Hargis
is convinced, the newspaper serves as a tool of "legal
license for Communist activities." He refers to reporters
as "interpreters," "dupes," "so-called liberals," and
30Hargis, Communist America, p. 33.
31Christian Crusade (September, 1962), p. 18. Theseresolutions were made at the Fourth Annual CC Convention,August 3-5, 1962, in Tulsa.
30
"Journalistic eggheads."32 They fail to give a "true
picture" of Khrushchev and other Communist dictators and
prefer to give, Hargis maintains, a "sugar coated version
of Communists as misunderstood men honestly desirous of
peace." 33 He views the New York Times and the Washington
Post as liberal newspapers; the Atlanta Constitution and the
Atlanta Journal, edited by the "notorious" left-wing "radi-
cal" Ralph McGill, as "left-wing" papers. Even William
Randolph Hearst and his newspaper chain are considered by
Hargis to be guilty of aiding the cause of Communism. 4
Not only are the newspapers promoting Communist causes;
radio, television, magazines, and movies are also tools used
to misinform and mislead Americans. Life, Time, and Newsweek
are regarded by Hargis as liberal "slick magazines." Look,
Life, and Time are to be remembered, he warns, as magazines
of the "EXTREME LEFT" which supported Fidel Castro against
the "pro-American government in Cuba under Batista." Even
the conservative Saturday Evening Post has a liberal slant.35
3 2 Hargis, Communist America, pp. 23-24.
3 3 The Weekly Crusader, April 9, 1962, p. 8.
34 The Weekly Crusader, March 2, 1962, pp. 1, 7. In con-trast, Rossiter considers the Hearst papers as representativeof the "fierce anti-communism" of ultra-conservatives. ClintonRossiter, Conservatism in America: The Thankless Persuasion(New York, 1962),pp.17-171.
35The Weekly Crusader, May 4, 1962, p. 1; March 2, 1962,p. 3; Monthly letter to CC friends, "It's high time the goodChristian people of America know the truth about~the TimeSmear."
31
Of recent concern to Hargis have been the numerous
newspaper and magazine articles designed to "smear" him and
the effective work of Christian Crusade; "smears" manufactured
by liberal and pro-Communist forces. Some recent (1960 to
the present) "smear" articles which Hargis has mentioned in
Crusade literature are: "Heavyweight Champ," Time (August 17,
1962); "Doomsday Merchant on the Far, Far Right," Saturday
Evening Post (April 28, 1962); "The Rightist Crisis in Our
Churches," Look (April 24, 1962); and "The Far Right:
Crusade and Collect," Newsweek (April 1, 1963).
Hargis is critical of the failure of newspapers and
magazines to report the news; instead, he says, they give
opinions and leave out facts. Concerning the reporting of
racial troubles, he decries the failure to report the "cold
facts" regarding the role "Communist conspirators" have had
and are having. Reporters fail to reveal that the Communists
have created all the social crises America has faced in the
last twenty-five years.36
Since a major goal of Communism is to discredit all
Congressional investigation of Communism, and since the
American press, with few exceptions, has opposed these in-
vestigations, there can be no other conclusion, Hargis says,
than to assume the press is doing the work of Communism.37
36Hargis, Communist America, p. 24.
37Hargis, Communist America, p. 25.
32
Other evidence of Communist work done by the press is
found in its use of the term "McCarthyism." Hargis maintains
the term was first used by Gus Hall (whom he usually identi-
fies first as an "ex-convict" and then as head of the Commu-
nist Party, U.S.A.) in a May 3, 1950,issue of the Daily
Worker, "The Great American Press leaped into action,"
Hargis says, following Hall's directive for a campaign to
rid America of "McCarthyism.tt38
The "great betrayal" of China is considered by Hargis
to be a fault of the "controlled" press. It falsely reported
that Chiang Kai-shek was a "scoundrel"; it incorrectly
identified the Communists as "agrarian reformers"; and in
general supported the betrayal directed by George Marshall
and Owen Lattimore.
Even the Letters to the Editor section of the newspaper
is controlled by those who are aiding the Communists.
"Fellow-travelers," "so-called liberals," and Communists have
taken over this important public opinion forum. Hargis is
alarmed at the depth of infiltration and subversion, so much
so that he calls on the American people no longer to place
38Hargis, Communist America, pp. 26-27. Herbert Block,political cartoonist for The Washington Post, used the termin a cartoon two months pFevious to Rals use and iscredited with its origination. Eric F. Goldman, The CrucialDecade--and After: America, 1945-1960 (New York, 19El7p. 145. ~Block says,7"TheMcCarthyism cartoon appeared inMarch, 1950. , . . I've never heard of any use of the wordprevious to the March, 1950 cartoon." A copy of the cartoonmay be found in The Herblock Book (New York, 1952), p. 145.Letter from Herbert Block, July 12, 1963.
33
complete trust in their papers. Flood the editors, he says,
with protests against this takeover.39
Turning to reporters, Hargis considers Drew Pearson to
be playing the "Moscow game" directed by Krushchev. "It is
a fact," he says, "that Khrushchev assigned American news-
papermen to smear anti-Communist organizations.' that "outside
of the Devil, Drew Pearson is the biggest liar that ever
lived"; and that Pearson began smearing CC after a visit to
Russia. Concerning this visit, Hargis asks, "Was he
Pearson] given special orders in Moscow to destroy the
effective ministry of Christian Crusade with his lying pen?"
Hargis considers the "smears" he receives from Pearson to be
both good and tad; bad because they are Communist inspired,
good because they are a recognition of the effective work of
CC. Indeed, he deems it an honor to be singled out, along
with Joseph McCarthy, Chiang Kai-shek, and James Forrestal,
by this "slimy character assassin."0
As though control of the press were not enough, the
Communists have as their goal the subversion and infiltration
of education from the kindergartens to the universities, and
as a result the traditional red brick school house is indeed
becoming Red. With this as his thesis on Communism and
education, Hargis asks, "Do our fathers and mothers fully
39Hargis, Communist America, p. 30.
40Billy James Hargis, The y Truth about Drew Pearson(Tulsa, [n.d.j), pp. 1-41, 6,Pearson is pictured on thecover in front of a horned Satan bearing his resemblance.
34
realize the Communists are after our youth"; that they are
already quite successful; that the United States is being
lost from within because so little is being done to stop
them?41
Little is said about Communist activities in the ele-
mentary grades; it is assumed to be active and successful.
Hargis' main discussion of infiltration concerns itself with
the high schools, universities, and the Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare. He categorically states that the
teaching of the past forty years has been injurious. It
plays down the "American way" and America's great tra-
ditions; debunks the Founding Fathers, the Declaration of
Independence, and the Constitution, while it plays up
Socialism and Communism. The effect of this kind of teaching
is to dechristianize America, and, according to Hargis, has
been done purposely. He feels that the pro-Communist teach-
ing program of the schools and universities and parental
blind trust in them are to blame for "millions of citizens
who do not know the history of their own country"; and for
the "average father" who knows more about "Gunsmoke" than
about his children's education.4 2
That the Communists are being successful can be seen
from a Purdue University research report which, Hargis says,
states that from "11 to 62 per cent" of America's high school
4lHargis, Communist America, pp. 55-61.
k2Hargis, Communist America, pp. 57-58.
35
students accept one or more Socialist views. The Socialism
which the high schooler is being taught to accept is that the
United States government should abolish the right of inheri-
tance, own basic industries, operate and control all banks
and credits, and own "all" means of transportation and
communication. The seeds which teachers are planting in the
minds of their students will eventually lead, Hargis fears,
to a belief that the Soviet system is better than the Ameri-
can system.43 Whenever there is any comparison between the
Soviet and American systems, Hargis usually interjects the
thought that the Soviet system is "totally" wrong and would
have collapsed long ago were it not for American aid and
"subversive elements" within the school system.
Socialism in the schools can even be seen in the grading
system, Hargis points out, for in California a high school
girl received an A for an essay suggesting that "America
should surrender to the Kremlin," while in Arizona the state
educators would not even let students enter an essay contest
on the "Advantages of Private Medical Care" and the "Ad-
vantages of the Free Enterprise System." Any who desire
additional evidence of the socialization of America are re-
ferred to E. Merrill Root's Brainwa in the Hi Schools,
based on a study of eleven American history texts used in
high schools in 1952. Root writes that the high schooler is
conditioned to accept a totalitarian Socialistic way of life
43Hargis, Communist America, p. 58.
36
through a study of American history as interpreted from the
liberal and Socialist point of view.44
Hargis accuses the American Association of University
Professors (AAUP) of not acting to stop subversive professors
from corrupting the minds of students. This accusation is
based on the AAUP's disapproval of loyalty oaths and the
McCarthy hearings. He points out that Helen C. White, past
president of AAUP has a record of "supporting Communist-
front apparatus." "Many" other professors in the organi-
zation also have "records." Hargis concludes that America's
universities contain not only "egghead intellectuals," but
also the "hardest of the hardcore Communists" who are
teaching students to accept the "ugly pattern" of the Soviet
Union. These "hardcore" Communists in the universities are
"godless, anti-Christ, Communists--key strategists in an
international conspiracy for the overthrow of the world.45
Herbert A. Philbrick, nine years a Communist for the
FBI, whom Hargis quotes approvingly on the subversion of
education, says that the Communists are most successful in
the infiltration of the Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare. In that department, Philbrick reports, "fully one-
third of the top eschelon of the Communist conspirators in
this country" will be found. "It is estimated that from 75
to 80 per cent of the responsible officers in the department
44 Hargis, Communist America, pp. 62-64, 69-71.
45Hargis, Communist America, pp. 72-74.
37
are conspirators, 46 Hargis finds evidence to support Phil-
brick's charge in HEW Circular 532 distributed to teachers
in June 1958, entitled "The Education of the Able Student."
The bibliography recommends an article by Walter Reuther, a
vice-president of the AFL-CIO, entitled "What the Public
Schools Should Teach." Hargis describes Reuther as an
"ardent pro-Communist," basing this on Reuther's eighteen-
month trip to Russia and a letter he wrote to friends in
Detroit in the 1930's, describing his desire that the United
States become a "Soviet America." This is proof enough for
Hargis that HEW has been turned into a "Kremlin directed
base for the subversion of three vital American pillars:
health, education, and welfare."4 7
As with education, CC has much to say about the Negro
and other racial problems, although the Crusade's officially
stated position is that it is not anti-Negro, anti-Catholic,
anti-Semitic, or anti- anything except Communism. The press
has made racial segregation a controversy, Hargis believes,
rather than revealing it as it really is--a social crisis
"plotted by the Communists." Hargis says the Southern Negro
does not want integration, and quotes an editorial by Davis
Lee, Negro publisher of the Anderson (South Carolina) Herald
to prove his point:
46Hargis, Communist America, p. 60.
47Hargis, Communist America, pp. 60-61.
38
When we were first brought to this country we . , .were worshipping the cow, the sun and the moon--every-thing was God to us but the true living God. TheSouthern white man taught us to believe in the real Godand in Christ, the Saviour of all men, black and white.This one revelation changed us from a savage into thelikeness of God with a soul to save. Once we embracedChristianity we became a different people, and throughour simple religious concept, thousands became ourfriends and benefactors. We had God on our side and inour corner. White people began to cultivate us asfriends, as trusted and loyal people. The slave ownershad so much faith in us, that when they went off to warbetween the states . . . they left black men behind tocare for their wives and children. They could not havepaid a finer tribute than this. No slave owner wasafraid that we would force our attention upon his wife.We were people of character; we had demonstrated thatwe could be trusted. The Southern white man, afteremancipation, did not inaugurfle this system ofsegregation that we have now.
Hargis says that sixty-one per cent of the national
officers of the NAACP (which he prefers to call the "National
Association for the Agitation of Colored People") have been
involved in one or more Communist activities It was in
support of this "agitation" society that President Kennedy
sent troops into Mississippi in 1962. This, says Hargis, is
government by pressure of "a very Un-American minority
group."50 He believes that the real issue at Oxford was not
integration, but state's rights.
At a 1963 New England Rally for God and Country, Hargis
commented to reporters on the picketing of the rally by the
48Hargis, Communist America, pp. 101-102; Davis Leealso says the progressives, liberals, social reformers, thefellow-travelers and pro-Communists are the guilty ones instirring up race controversy.
49Hargis, Communist America, p. 110.
50 Christian Crusade (December, 1962), p. 4.
39
NAACP that he had never "been called a segregationist until
the Boston N.A.A.C.P." gave him that label. He also is
reported to have said that he feels integration is "inevi-
table . . . it is the law of the land."51 Yet in a Dallas
rally, December 7, 1962, he proposed segregated anti-
Communist organizations, and in particular a "Negro Anti-
Communist Crusade.1152
CC has given special attention to Martin Luther King,
Jr., president of the Southern Christian Leadership Confer-
ence, in a pamphlet entitled Unmaski Martin Luther Ki,
Jr., the Deceiver. To Hargis, King is a race agitator guilty
of pro-Communist actions because he: favors the abolishment
of HUAC; disagreed with McCarthy; and associates with other
"known Communists" such as Carl Braden, Frank Wilkinson, and
Abner W. Berry, Negro member of the Central Committee of the
Communist Party. Hargis wants to know if King is really
interested in the Negro or if he is concerned with the Negro
only to further Communist objectives in America. He wonders
why King favors abolishing HUAC. "Could it be," Hargis asks,
"that he fears exposure of his true motives from this in-
vestigating committee?" 53
5 1Boston Sunday Globe, January 6, 1963, p. 53.
52Statement by Billy James Hargis, Dallas, Texas,December 7, 1962.
53Billy James Hargis, Unmasking the Deceiver: MartinLuther Kin , Jr. (Tulsa, [n.d.j),pp.~l-7TKingsays thatwherever e holds meetings, Unmasking the Deceiver is distri-buted by Hargis' followers. Statementby Martin Luther King,Dallas, Texas, January 4, 1963.
40
Although he considers HUAC an exposer of Communism,
Hargis believes that the net effect of government policy is
to move America toward Communism, and points to the farm
program, the postal department, the medical care for the
aged proposal, foreign aid, the influence of Americans for
Democratic Action on the Kennedy administration, and the
Supreme Court. He finds it reasonable that the Communists
should consider control of the American farmer an important
goal, and since there has been an ever-increasing degree of
government control over farming from the 1930's to the
present, Hargis concludes that the Communist conspiracy is
being successful. A recent step.to complete control was
taken in 1961 when Kennedy asked Congress to authorize the
Secretary of Agriculture to supervise election of an advisory
committee for each farm commodity. These committees are to
work out the "taxpayer-supported program and you can be sure
that the hidden finger of Communist conspirators will be
there behind the scenes, trying," Hargis says, "to push this
. . . towards a Soviet farm program for America."54
Even the Post Office Department is being flooded by
Communist subversion, Hargis warns, for in a 12-month period
over 300,000 packages of Communist propaganda came into the
United States through the Port of New Orleans alone, to be
54Billy James Hargis, The Communist Program for theAmerican Farmer (Tulsa, Zn.I),Pp.TTF7.
41
sent through the mails to schools and colleges at taxpayers'
expense. In 1948 the United States government stopped the
Soviet use of United States mail for propaganda purposes, but
Kennedy, by executive order in March 1961, "ordered all propa-
ganda solicited or unsolicited delivered to the addresses."
Hargis says since the executive order was put into effect
the Communist propaganda coming into this country has in-
creased "130%." To allow the Soviets to use United States
mails on the basis that it will improve cultural exchanges
is, he says, "the essence of naivety and complete folly" and
provides yet another example of the "suicidal incompetence"
of the government of the United States.55
Now, Hargis writes, the government is attempting to
open another door for Communist takeover: medical care for
the aged. It should not be forgotten, he reminds his readers,
that socialized medicine has been a goal of the international
Communist conspiracy for years. As proof he cites the
March 12, 1961 issue of the Worker, which carried an article
entitled "A FIRST STEP TO MEDICAL CARE FOR THE AGED." The
first step was Kennedy's proposal for such legislation.
The basic reasons for Hargis' opposition to this legislation
are that it is a goal of the Communists, it will not work,
it has not worked (look at Britain), and it is a "socialist
55Billy James Hargis, The Postal Propaganda Problem(Tulsa, [n.d.]), pp. 1, 5-6.
42
planners' foot-in-the-door" scheme for government control of
medicine.56
Foreign aid is deceiving America into "financing its
own self destruction." This is so, claims Hargis, because
of the seventy-five billion dollars in aid from America in
the past fifteen years, over sixty billion, or eighty per
cent, went to the Communists or their allies. His conclusion
is, "Communism would have died many deaths, but for the
helping hand of America." In recent years, he claims, "the
helping hand" has given $465,424,000 in foreign aid to the
Soviet Union. The only solution to this treason is "a
national referendum on foreign aid, or by some other means
shut off the flow of money to anti-Christian enemies."5 7
Americans for Democratic Action is a "Trojan Horse"
organization infiltrating the government for the purposes of
"selling" Socialism. This is the opinion, quoted by Hargis,
of the late Congressman Kit Clardy of Michigan. Hargis is
concerned with ADA's weakening of "America's first line of
defense"--the immigration laws, its call for unification of
Korea under the United Nations, its call for "more aid to
56Billy James Hargis, Uncle Sam M.D.? (Tulsa, [n.d.7),pp. 1, 3, 5.
57Hargis, Communist America, pp. 134-135, 144-148:Hargis believes that most of the world's nations are eitherCommunist or Communist allies, excepting only Free China,South Korea, Spain, and Portugal. This accounts for hiscomputation of the amount of United States foreign aid toCommunists.
43
the pro-Soviet . . . Nehru of India," its desire for recog-
nition of Red China and her admission to the United Nations.
Hargis deplores the fact that there are forty ADA members in
the Kennedy administration, but no members of the John Birch
Society.58
Continuing his list of Communist-influenced government
agencies, the Oklahoma crusader asserts that the Supreme
Court has strengthened the Communist conspiracy within and
against America in the last five years, so much so that
today (1960) the American people are "practically powerless
against the enemy." He states that President Eisenhower's
appointees to the Court, in cases involving the Communist
conspiracy, have voted "92%, 90%, 58% and 36% in favor of
the enemies of America." Chief Justice Earl Warren is the
"92%" voter. The Supreme Court has strengthened the enemy,
Hargis says, through its rulings which deny congressional
committees "freedom to investigate Communists and pro-
Communists," which deny states the right to enforce their
own anti-subversive laws, which say the executive branch of
the government cannot dismiss security risks, and which say
the United States must grant passports to those refusing to
58Billy James Har is, Radicalism of the Left--Americansfor Democratic Action Tulsa[n. ,pp~~-3T~Tll presentor~former ADA members in Kennedy's administration are listedin this pamphlet and are accused of "fuzzy irresponsiblethinking" which has contributed to gains by the 'atheisticCommunistic conspiracy in the world." Quoted from Roy Cohn,former counsel to the McCarthy Senate Subcommittee, beforethe ADA, October, 1958.
44
sign non-Communist affidavits. The solution? "An Act of
Congress providing that the states shall have concurrent
jurisdiction in the field of sedition."59 Hargis concludes
that America's government is in such a state that "the
people of the United States have ceased to be their own
rulers--and the government now ruling them is heavily pro-
Communist * 60
On the international scene, Crusade pamphlets report
that United States' membership in the United Nations has
brought the day of America's conquest by the Communists
alarmingly near. It is not surprising that the United
Nations is "destroying America by degrees," for the United
Nations was "the result of a declaration from Moscow, and is
becoming itself a Moscow declaration." Hargis describes it
as the "GREATEST HOAX EVER PERPETRATED ON THE AMERICAN
PUBLIC," and advocates either the expulsion of Communist
nations from the United Nations, or the immediate withdrawal
of the United States.61
Hargis objects to the United Nations as Kremlin-planned
and engineered by traitors in the United States. Chief among
59Hargis, Communist America, pp. 110, 114, 118: Hargiscites Communist Partv. Subversive Activities Control Board,Pennsylvania v. Steve Nelson, Yates v. United States,andWatkins v. United States.
60Hargis, Communist America, p. 110: When this was writtenEisenhower was serving his last year as president.
6lHargis, Communist America, pp. 119-120; Billy JamesHargis, The United Nations: Destroying America by Degrees(Tulsa, Tn.d. *)T. 1.
45
the traitors he names Alger Hiss, a Kremlin agent influential
at the Yalta Conference, top man in the State Department on
United Nations planning, and a key figure in the drawing up
of the United Nations constitution. Hiss was also suc-
cessful in getting over five hundred Communist sympathizers
on United States payrolls in the United Nations. Undoubtedly,
Hargis says, some are still there working for the best
interests of the Communists.62
The Kremlin was not content with just starting a world
organization--they intended to use it as a major propaganda
forum and a hideout for spies and saboteurs. To insure the
accomplishment of this goal, Hargis believes, is the reason
the Soviet Union "insisted" the United Nations be located in
the United States. This enables the Soviets to spread "the
gospel of Communism" under the cover of diplomatic immunity.63
Hargis expresses concern over the new United Nations
members, particularly the newly-created African nations,
"most of which fare] only slightly removed from cannibalism,"
and are strongly leaning toward Communism. The votes of
these new members, coupled with the votes of the captive
Communist nations, will soon bring about a "landslide"
sellout of America's sovereignty.64
62Hargis, Communist America, p. 121; Hargis, The UnitedNations, pp. 2-
63Hargis, The United Nations, p. 4.
64Hargis, The United Nations, p. 5.
46
A strong supporter of the United Nations is the National
Council of Churches (NCC). One of Hargis' pamphlets, used
in the Air Reserve Center Trainin Manual which caused a
national furor, was The National Council of Churches Indicts
Itself: 50 Counts of Treason to God and Co The main
argument of the pamphlet is that the Communists, fellow-
travelers, and sympathizers have been successful in in-
filtrating the churches of America, particularly the NCC.
Hargis based his claim of infiltration on a 1935 United
States Naval Intelligence report which states that the
Federal Council of Churches (reorganized into the NCC in
1950) was "subversive" and "gave aid and comfort to the
Communist movement and party."
As an illustration of his "50 Counts," Count 14 con-
demns Union Theological Seminary as contributing to Communist
goals by allowing Earl Browder, while he was head of the
Communist Party, U.S.A., to speak to its students. Count 28
blames the Federal Council of Churches for Pearl Harbor
because of its lobbying in Washington against a preparedness
program; Hargis concludes that the "pacifism" of the Federal
Council "is directly responsible for the thousands of boys
who were killed in the beginning days of World War II." The
"shocking NCC reading list" is Count 30, because it includes
W. E. B. Dubois' book, Black Reconstruction. Since Dubois
has been associated with over seventy-five Communist fronts
and causes, Hargis says, a recommendation of his book should
be sufficient evidence to "any thinking" person of the
Communist influence of the NCC.65
Hargis propagates his views on the state of the nation
by means of ratio and literature. He began his radio work
on a Mutual Broadcasting System station in Siloam Springs,
Arkansas, speaking once a week for fifteen minutes. He now
has six hundred fifteen-minute and one hundred fifty thirty-
minute broadcasts a week on stations in nearly every state,
plus Puerto Rico and Monterrey, Mexico. Television is less
widely used, with eight states carrying a weekly fifteen-
minute CC program. The television programs deal with what
CC considers to be the effects of Communist subversion in
America. Color and black and white movies of these programs
are made available to churches and schools.66
CC's literary activities are extensive. The Crusade
publishes a weekly eight-page magazine entitled The Weekly
65Billy James Hargis, The Facts about Communism and OurChurches (Tulsa, 1962), pp.~3-37: This work of 247pagesuses the same argument repeatedly presented by ultra-rightistsagainst those clergy who were sympathetic toward the SovietUnion during the thirties and early forties and who areliberal in their political and economic views; also BillyJames Hargis The National Council of Churches Indicts Itself(Tulsa, 1960, pp. 11, 20, 30-32A ccusations of Communistinfiltration in the churches prompted Louis Cassels' "TheRightist Crisis in Our Churches," and Ralph Lord Roy'sCommunism and the Churches, Communism in American Life,edited by Clinton Rossiter (New York, 1960).
66Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade, pp. 7-8;Hargis, A Call to Action, p. 4; City, station, dial, andtime programs may be heard are listed in Christian CrusadeInternational Radio Network (Tulsa, April, 1962).
48
Crusader. The lead editorial is written by Hargis or a
"prominent American"; it consists of an analysis of national
and international news. C. A. Willoughby, former chief of
intelligence for General Douglas MacArthur, is joint editor
of the magazine and contributes a "Foreign Intelligence
Digest" section.6 7
Christian Crusade is the title of a monthly magazine
which Crusade publicity claims has a circulation of 110,000
copies, with over 500,000 readers. Examination of the June
1962 issue reveals a reprint from Southwestern Telephone
News; a sermon of the month by Hargis; announcements of the
month's speaking engagements; a devotional by Bob Jones,
Jr., president of Bob Jones University, Greenville, South
Carolina; "A Counterspy's Views on Communist Subversion,"
by Matt Cvetic, who for nine years was a Communist for the
FBI; an article by Benjamin Gitlow, former general secretary
of the Communist Party, U.S.A.; a "Foreign Intelligence
Digest" section by C. A. Willoughby; advertisements featuring
Crusade literature for sale; and many appeals for contri-
butions. The subscription price is $1 a year.68
6 (The Weekly Crusader, June 29, 1962, p. 3; Hargis,Facts about Christian Crusade, p. 8.
68 Christian Crusade (June, 1962), pp. 2-3, 7, 9-10, 12,16, 21-22; Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade, p. 8;Hargis, A Call to Action, p. 4, Other periodicals recom-mended by Christian Crusade in "Suggested Literature andOrganizations" are Human Events, Free Enterprise, AmericanOpinion, The Dan Smoot Report, anT T eiring7Line.
49
Other literature includes three books written by Hargis.
CC points out that Communist America: Must It Be? is Hargis'
"first full length book," and it is "more than a book," it
is a "weapon." Containing 182 pages, it is a book which,
Crusade literature says, "thousands believe . . , is the
most valuable and most informative anti-Communist book of
the decade." From its first copyright date in 1960 to its
fifth edition in 1962, 150,000 copies have been printed.
It originally sold for $3 and now can be purchased for 250
as a paperback. Sample chapter headings give the flavor of
its theme: "A Bird's Eye View of Treason"; "America--Marked
for Conquest"; "A Free Press--Leading America Leftward";
"Patriotism--Once Revered, Now Smeared"; "A Supreme Court
Against America."69
Hargis' second book, The Facts about Communism and Our
Churches, was published in 1962 in a 50,000 copy, 250-page
edition selling for $2.50 clothbound and $1 paperback, It
is viewed by CC as the first book dealing with Communism and
the churches to be written by "a leading anti-Communist" in
69Hargis, Communist America, p. II; Hargis, Facts aboutChristian Crusade,p. . argis says that no major publish-ing house will publish a book written by him or by any otherrightist, except some recently opened conservative publishinghouses. Therefore, he says, "to get our works published wehad to finance their printings and organize our own methodsof distribution. . . . If the old-line publishing housescontrolled by liberals will not print our works, we willbuild our own publishing houses." The Weekly Crusader,March 9, 1962, p. 7.
50
seven years.7 0 This book makes no wild claims, Hargis
writes, it is "completely researched," documented and foot-
noted, and deals only with "Facts.*
His third book, Communism: The Total Lie, reveals the
extent to which the Communist conspiracy is undermining
American society and describes, as CC views it, what living
under Communist rule would mean. Dedicated to and written
for the "women of America," it is to be used as a "weapon"
against the infiltration of liberalism, Socialism, and
Communism into "their own family circles." Hargis says,
"If you can get the good women of America stirred up over
the Communist and Socialist threat, they will change the
course of history on the side of freedomtt2 Again, sample
chapter headings reveal its style: "Communist Treatment of
Women"; and "Welcome, Bloody Butcher!"
Hargis' prolific pen is now preparing another book which
he feels is a "must": The Betrayal by America's Liberal Press.
It will expose Communist and Socialist sympathies and the
press's "hatred" for conservatives and religious orthodoxy.73
Other books, not written by Hargis, but recommended and
distributed by CC include John T. Flynn's The Decline of the
70Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade, p. 9; Hargis,The Facts about Communism and Our Churches, dedication page;Christian Crusade (December,~l 7), P. 6.
71Rossiter, Conservatism in America, p. 284.72Christian Crusade (March, 1963), p. 5.73 Christian Crusade (March, 1963), p. 2.
51
American Republic, Rosalie M. Gordon's Nine Men Against
America, Merrill Root's Brainwahin in te Hg Schools,
Zygmund Dobbs' aRIntri and Race Turmoil, Matt Cvetic's
The B Decision, Edgar Bundy's Collectivism in the Churches,
Barry Goldwater's Why Not Victory, Charles A. Willoughby's
and John Chamberlain's MacArthur--1941-1945, Bryton Barron's
The Untouchable State Department, and a John Birch Society
twelve-volume paperback series entitled "One Dozen Candles."74
Hargis is particularly active as a pamphleteer, for he
feels that to save America CC must distribute "anti-
Communist, anti-Socialist, anti-liberal, anti-atheist, anti-
apostate" literature by the "tons each month."75 Most of
the pamphlets distributed by CC appear first as lead articles
in Christian Crusade or editorials in The Weekly Crusader.
They are then republished in pamphlet form with such colorful
titles as Will the Real Nikita Khrushchev Please Stand Up?;
Unmasking the Deceiver: Martin Luther King, Jr.; Paul Revere's
Ride.76
74Most of these were Crusade Book Club editions. Anti-Communist and anti-liberal books are given quarterly to CCmembers. Non-members receive the books by paying $10 a year.The titles were taken from Crusade literature, particularlyChristian Crusade (September, 1962), p. 20, and "SuggestedLiterature and Organizations."U
75The Weekly Crusader, March 2, 1962, p. 8.
76Hargis writes that CC hired men "skilled in psycho-logical literature" to help them prepare "attractivepamphlets that will be read by the masses." The WeeklyCrusader, March 2, 1962, p. 8.
52
CC uses the movie to good effect as a communicative
tool, having produced thirteen full-length movies and nine
fifteen-minute filmed interviews between Hargis and "famous
statesmen."v Crusaders may use these films in five ways:
buy them outright; rent them to show in schools and churches,
at $25 per showing; use them for television, either in an
individual showing or all together in an all-night program
(of this proposal Hargis asks his readers, "Can you imagine
the impact of a TWELVE HOUR ALL-NIGHT ANTI-COMMUNIST TELE-
VISION MARATHON in your town?"); use them in "Church
Awakening Crusades," lasting two weeks, showing one film
each night with a "giant" rally the concluding night; or,
show the fifteen-minute Hargis interviews on television
once a week, paid for by "interested friends."7 8
Any study of an anti-Communist organization must take
into account its financial support. Over 100,000 contributors
gave $1,000,000 to CC in 1961, partly through the purchase
of books, pamphlets, and subscriptions to The Weekly Crusader
and Christian Crusade. Hargis turned over to the Crusade
$145,000 in lecture fees and $50,000 in book and record
royalties. The rest of the 1961 income was received as
77Christian Crusade (October, 1962), p. 2. SeeAppendix B for a list of films, giving speaker, subject,length, and price.
78 Christian Crusade (October, 1962), pp. 2-3, 23. Thereis no indication n ruade literature that any of theseproposals have been accepted by "interested friends" and putinto operation.
53
gifts. Such gifts are tax deductible, since CC is a non-
profit educational agency.7 9 In 1962, the Crusade operated
on a $1,250,000 budget, an increase of $250,000 over 1961.
The financial benefits Hargis personally receives from CC
are a yearly tax-free salary of $12,000, plus expenses and
a $43,000 parsonage in Tulsa.80
In its battle against Communism, the Christian Crusade
has discovered infiltration and subversion to such an extent
that Hargis fears America is rapidly becoming a Soviet
Republic. The Crusade emphasizes no particular point of
infiltration; but, like a shotgun, scatters its fire over
every phase of American society.
79J. K. Adams, "Saving America, Inc.," Nation, CXCIII(September 30, 1961), 194; Martin, "Doomsday Merchant on theFar, Far Right," p. 19.
80Martin, "Doomsday Merchant on the Far, Far Right,"pp. 19-20.
CHAPTER III
EDGAR C. BUNDY AND THE CHURCH
LEAGUE OF AMERICA
While Edgar C. Bundy and the Church League of America
are as concerned as is Hargis with widespread Red Infil-
tration, Bundy's emphasis is on churches and education. His
method of operation is quite different from that of the well-
publicized Crusader in that he relies mainly on a seminar
plan and desires no publicity at all. His organization is
semi-secret, publishing only a monthly newspaper and special
reports. He uses only two outside speakers: Carl McIntire
and E. Merrill Root.
The CIA dates back to 1937, the year in which Franklin
D. Roosevelt sought to pack the Supreme Court. At that time
Frank J. Loesch, Henry P. Crowell, and George Washington
Robnett were particularly alarmed by Roosevelt's attempt to
alter the Court. Loesch was head of the Chicago Crime Com-
mission in its efforts to prosecute Al Capone, the notorious
Chicago gangster. He was also an elder in Chicagots Fourth
Presbyterian Church, a counselor for the American Medical
Association, a member of Chicago's Board of Education during
the 1930's, president of the Chicago Bar Association, and
54
55
simultaneously a trustee and the secretary of the Chicago
Historical Society.
The other two men were almost equally prominent. Henry
P. Crowell was Chairman of the Board of Quaker Oats, a
Presbyterian layman, and a heavy supporter of the Moody
Bible Institute in Chicago. George W. Robnett was a Chicago
advertising executive, a member of the Methodist Church, and,
CLA literature claims, an expert analyst on the subversive
activities of Communists and fellow-travelers in the United
States. He spent thirty years building a library of Commu-
nist and fellow-traveler literature and cataloging the names
of individuals associated with these subversive movements.
These three men were deeply concerned over the many
ministers whom they thought were including socialistic thought
in their sermons, thus paving the way for "complete sociali-
zation of the American way of life, including religious
institutions."1
On March 24, 1937, they met with other concerned men to
form an organization which would distribute to the minister
a regular bulletin describing any movement, political or
economic, which would have either a direct or indirect effect
on his church's present or future work. From this meeting,
attended by "prominent lay people of Methodist, Baptist,
Presbyterian, Episcopal, Congregational, and Disciples of
1What Is the Church League of America? (author notgiven) (Wheitton~,~~IllinoisTtn.d.TT, p. 2.
56
Christ churches,"2 came the Church League of America--born
in reaction to Roosevelt's alleged socialistic experimenta-
tion and sparked into existence by his attempt to pack the
Supreme Court.
CLA national headquarters were established in Chicago,
where they remained until 1952, when the League moved to
Evanston, Illinois. In 1956 the CLA permanently located in
Wheaton, Illinois.3
The Church League led a rather quiet existence until
1956, when Edgar C. Bundy became its acting General Chairman
and Executive Secretary. Born in Stamford, Connecticut on
November 1, 1915, Bundy was educated in Florida, Georgia,
and Illinois. CLA literature cites his 97.8 senior high
grade average and 96.0 freshman grade average at Oglethorpe
University, Atlanta, Georgia. Bundy turned down the remain-
ing three years of a scholarship at Oglethorpe and trans-
ferred to Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois in the fall of
1935, where he graduated with an English major in 1938.4
By February, 1941 Bundy had been drafted into the army.
He was commissioned a second lieutenant in October, 1942 and
promoted to the rank of captain before his release from active
2What Is the Church League, p. 2.
3What Is the Church League, p. 3; News & Views, March,1963, p. 1.
4News & Views, March, 1963, p. 6; The National Councilof the Protestant Episcopal Church, Sowing; Dissension in theChurches, A Report of the Department of Christian SociaTRelations (New York, [n.d.] ), p. 4.
57
duty in September 1948. Since 1948 he has been promoted to
a major in the Air Force Reserve.5 While in the service, he
was active for six years as an intelligence officer and
served in every major theater of war, including Europe, North
Africa, China-Burma-India, and in 1948 as Chief of Research
and Analysis of Intelligence of the Alaskan Air Command. His
military awards include Nationalist China's highest aviation
decoration, the Bronze Star, and five battle stars.6
Additional awards include the American Legion's Ameri-
canism citation, and the title "Young Man of the Year" from
the Wheaton Junior Chamber of Commerce. He has been an
active member of the DuPage (County, Illinois) Young Republi-
can Organization, the Sons of the American Revolution, the
Abraham Lincoln National Republican Club, co-ordinator of
the DuPage County Coalition of Patriots, the American Legion
National Convention's Americanization Committee, and secretary
of the Joint Foreign Relations-Americanization Convention
Committees.7 His intelligence work, extensive travels in
the Far East, and high military rank convey the impression
5Bundy makes much of his rank as a major, despite armyregulations against such use for other than a militarypurpose. AR 140-5, Sec. XII., par. 82b, cited in SowingDissension, p. 4. Ralph Lord Roy, Apostles of Discord(Boston, 1953), pp. 240-241. New York Times, March 21, 1960,p. 5.
6What Is the Church League, p. 6; Sowing Dissension, p. 4.
7What Is the Church League, p. 7.
58
that he has the knowledge and experience to be an expert on
the Communist conspiracy, both internal and external.8
Upon re-entering private life, Bundy became City Editor
of the Daily Journal, Wheaton, Illinois. He was given a
prestige boost when he received an invitation in June, 1949
from Senator Kenneth McKellar, Chairman of the United States
Senate Appropriations Committee, to testify on the Far East.
CLA literature says his testimony "was termed by Republican
and Democratic senators alike as being one of the finest
given on the Far East before a Senate Committee." According
to the transcript of his testimony, however, in commending
Bundy on his presentation Senators Bridges and McCarran said
only that the presentation was "very clear, able" and that
he was doing a great work.9
While under oath before this committee, Bundy predicted
a South Korea invasion by the North Korean Communists over a
year before it occurred. He also predicted the fall of
China and scored the "appeasement of the Soviet Union and
8A CLA manual cautions those looking for Communists to"depend on the judgment of trained and experienced anti-
Communists, i.e., former F.B.I., naval or military intelli-ence officers." A Manual for Survival (author not given)(Wheaton, Illinois, 1961), p~. Iversen adds, after WorldWar II a "new dimension in private anticommunism was suppliedby individuals and organizations which sought to make'counter-subversion' a science and were aided in this en-deavor by . . . former F.B.I. agents and military-intelli-gence veterans." Robert W. Iversen, The Communists and theSchools, Communism in American Life, edited by ClintonRossiter (New York, 1959), pp. 241-242,
9What Is the Church League, pp. 6-7; House of Represent-atives, 87th Congress, 2nd Session, Hearings before the Com-mittee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate (Washington, 1949),P. b07.
59
failure to recognize the Communist threat" in the Far East,
attributing this appeasement to the State Department, Secre-
tary of State Dean Acheson, and the Truman Administration.1 0
Church League publicity states that Bundy's testimony before
congressional committees was frequent and that he often
supplied them with research materials. 1 1
This appearance before Congress proved advantageous to
Bundy. He began to speak regularly before patriotic clubs
and societies, and universities and colleges, concerning
Communist inroads in American society. He was billed as a
research analyst, lecturer, author, and Executive Secretary
and General Chairman of the CLA. 1 2
Of even more significance to the CLA and the people it
seeks to educate is the fact that Bundy is a fundamentalist
minister. He was ordained in March, 1942 as a minister in
the Southern Baptist Convention at the Emmanuel Baptist
Church, Alexandria, Louisiana, and is presently a member of
the Twin City Baptist Temple of Mishawaka, Indiana.1 3
1UWhat Is the Church League, p. 7. Bundy warned thatif China fell t3~Communism , apan, the Philippines, India,Burma, the Malay States, and the Dutch East Indies wouldalso fall. House of Representatives, Committee onpriations, p. 594.
11Roy, Communism and the Churches, p.254; Frank J.Donner, The Un-Americans (New York, 1961), p. 258; "BishopOxnam's Challenge," Christian Century, LxX (August 5, 1953)1262-1264.
12Roy, Apostles of Discord, pp. 240-242.
13What Is the Church League, p. 7; o4n Dissension,p. 4 . -~ __
60
The impression intended for the reader of Church League
publicity is that the organization was founded by men of the
highest abilities in their respective professions, with fun-
damentalist religious belief; and is now led by a man of the
highest military experience, intellectual attainment, and
fundamentalist religion. People at the grass roots level
should have no fear in placing their complete faith in the
integrity of the organization and the reliability of its
materials.
In keeping with its founders' designs, the Church League
of America operates as a voluntary organization of citizens
who are affiliated with fundamentalism, and states the
following premises:
(1) The "spirit of valiant Christian Americanism" must
be rekindled.
(2) The "American System of free speech, free press,
free religion, free assemblage" must be preserved.
(3) The "American Way" has provided greater material
and spiritual prosperity than ever before attained.
(4) There is a world-wide struggle now creating un-
precedented problems in all areas of life, for which the
Christian must be prepared and on guard.
(5) As a growing force in America and the world, Marxian
Socialism is "an alarming threat to all existing orders,"
particularly Christianity.
(6) Organized radicalism can be seen in the growth of
National Socialism, evidenced by the expanding centralized
federal government. This trend must "inevitably eventuate
into some form of collectivism where the sovereignty of the
individual is totally eclipsed by the sovereignty of the
State."
(7) An "all powerful government tends to become arro-
gant, imperious, extravagant and Fascistic."14
(8) The CLA's purpose is "to preserve those American
traditions which constitute the only foundation upon which
free institutions can survive."
(9) Christian philosophy is in contrast to Marxian or
collectivist principles. There is no freedom of religion
in a Fascist or Socialist government.
(10) The CLA serves as a medium between intellectual
leaders and laymen, educating them to believe that "free
enterprise is the only economic foundation upon which free
institutions" such as churches and colleges can survive.
Based on these premises, the purpose and program of the
Church League is to:
(1) Disseminate literature to keep ministers aware of
the dangers of America's "trend toward national socialism";
(2) Give press releases to the newspapers in order to
broaden its influence;
14When Premises (6) and (7) were drawn up in 1937,National Socialism and Fascism were a major internationalproblem.
61
62
(3) Educate the minister, who in turn educates his
congregation, to oppose "radical schemes and totalitarian
trends";
(4) Coordinate the thinking of "sound thinking ministers
into a powerful voice" which can be heard when national
issues of great importance arise;
(5) Influence "left-wing ministers who are strongly
Socialistic."15
How does the CIA educate ministers and coordinate them
into effective pressure groups, and influence the general
public and "left-wing ministers"? The answer is a variety
of books; special reports in the form of photographically
reproduced HUAC reports, magazine articles, and excerpts
from the Congressional Record; a monthly tabloid newspaper
entitled News & Views; tapes and films; local conferences;
and counter-subversive seminars. Examples from various
pieces of educational literature will illustrate the League's
method of communicating with the public.
News & Views, edited by Bundy, is a six-page newspaper
with a burning torch of liberty as its trademark and the
motto: "Eternal Vigilance is Forever the Price of Freedom."
It is considered a reporting service to those who support the
15What Is the Church League, pp. 4-5. In contrast toPurpose&( aa recent Tece Y iterature from the CLA in-cludes the statement: "No newspaper publicity desired."The Church League of America Seminar Plan (Wheaton, Illinois,n~.~dJJT. I.
63
Church League, "unique and different from anything else
published." It gives its readers a picture of the radical
movement (leftists, liberals, Socialists, Communists); it
enables "sponsors to get their money's worth"; it offers
employers "insurance" by keeping "their own key employees
informed as to the radical movement"; it lets sponsors know
what the Church League is doing; and it lets everyone know
that "we ECLA] know our subject.,16
Occasionally, when important issues need immediate
communication, a special edition of News & Views or a special
report with the News & Views format is published.
The CLA does not hesitate to photographically reproduce
articles in whole or in part in order to demonstrate the
extent of Communist subversion in American society. A one-
page reproduction of Time's March 16, 1942 Religion Section
was titled by the CLA, "Here is the blueprint FOR THE DE-
STRUCTION OF THE UNITED STATES." Discussing the 1942 Federal
Council of Churches meeting, the article pointed out that
John Foster Dulles, chairman of the conference, submitted a
set of prerequisites for a lasting peace upon conclusion of
World War II. Dulles blamed United States' behavior, based
on economic self-interest, between the two wars as contribut-
ing to her poor show in world leadership. Pointing out that
the world's natural wealth is unevenly distributed, he made
a plea to the wealthy nations to regard themselves as a trust
16What Is the Church League, pp. 4-5.
64
to be discharged in the best interests of all nations. The
conference program adopted called for a world government,
abandonment of isolationism for the United States, limitations
of national sovereignty, international control of armies and
navies, worldwide freedom of immigration, elimination of
tariffs and trade restrictions, and an international bank,
The conference called attention to the profit motive in
capitalism as a breeding ground for war.
The CLA sees this article as a blueprint drawn up by
Dulles to destroy the United States and asks why Dulles, as
chairman of the "left-wing Council of Churches," was made
Secretary of State under Eisenhower. The reader, it is
hoped, will come to the conclusion that Dulles, as a dupe,
was working toward fulfilling Communist objectives in
America.1 7
The CLA library has been collecting books, pamphlets,
sermons, and Sunday School quarterlies on religious, politi-
cal, and social movements since its beginning in 1937. It
contains a section built around John Dewey, "whose philosophy
of pragmatism . . . softened many intellectuals in America
for the acceptance of communism." The library also contains
thousands of files on individuals and organizations who, it
is felt, have been engaged in subversive or fellow-traveler
1 7"American Malvern," Time (March 16, 1942), reproducedby the CLA (Wheaton, Illinois,7Un.d.j). Bundy attempts tofurther implicate Dulles by writing that he was a longtimefriend of Alger Hiss and the NCC. Edgar C. Bundy, Collectiv-ism in the Churches (Wheaton, Illinois, 1961), pp. 1b3-lb.
65
activities. At present there are over 850,000 of these, on
cross-referenced index cards. They state whether the indi-
vidual, organization, or publication is or was a Communist
Party member, fellow-traveler, party sympathizer or front-
joiner; or simply a dupe. "Thousands of ministers" write to
the CLA for this information for use in sermons and classes
in religious schools. The CLA considers its file system one
of the twelve best in the country.
In addition, the CLA library holds original documents
from the American League of Peace and Democracy, the Fellow-
ship of Reconciliation, the Americans for Democratic Action,
and the American Civil Liberties Union. Communist materials
include propaganda from the International Workers of the
World, the American-Russian Institute, the American Committee
for the Protection of the Foreign Born, and "hundreds of
others." Publications dating back to 1919 are the New Masses,
Daily Worker, the Communist, Political Affairs, and the
People's Daily World.18
Besides News & Views and occasional special reports, the
CLA's main method of educating people on the strategy and
1 8 What Is the Church League, p. 3. Upon reading a de-scription of this self-acclaimed top-notch library on subver-sive activities, one gains the impression it is there forpublic use. This is not the case. This impressive list ofresearch materials on political and economic activities ofthe twentieth century is "closed to the public." The "filesare available only to staff members of the Church League ofAmerica and the Board of Directors." Whatever one may desireto know about the CLA or the information it can provide maybe obtained only through its official publications. Letterfrom Edgar C. Bundy, December 19, 1962.
66
tactics of Communism is the seminar plan. The two-day
counter-subversive seminar, Bundy claims, was pioneered by
the CIA, which has been holding seminars since 1937. Though
other organizations have copied this plan, they deal in
generalizations and theories, rather than in "specifics."
When a person desires a seminar in his area he must
produce a minimum of fifty people who are willing to meet
for two or three days. These people must be invited indi-
vidually, not through ads, for, Bundy says, this is "a
private school for students, not for infiltrating agitators."
Those attending the seminar must agree to not distribute any
unauthorized literature or tape any of the lectures. A ten
dollar fee entitles the student to six classes, a documen-
tation kit, a year's subscription to News & Views, and the
special report service. Bundy instructs the seminar students
from A Manual for Survival, published by the CLA.19
The CIA, Bundy asserts, is the only organization of its
kind, dealing in facts rather than generalizations, and
therefore is deserving of financial support. Such support
comes from individuals, churches, foundations, and business
corporations. Gifts to the CIA have been tax deductible
19The Church League of America Seminar Plan, p. 1; AManual Tor Survival, p. 2'06. During June anad~T-gust 1963Bundy wTTT hold several seminars at Hotel Christian Admiral,a new Bible and Patriots Conference Center in Cape May,N.J., owned and operated by the 20th Century ReformationHour, a Carl McIntire program. Christian Beacon, May 16,1963, pp. 1, 8.
since 1942; individuals are encouraged to give liberally and
to include the CLA in their wills.
Among the corporations and industries listed as CLA
contributors are Armour & Company; Borg-Warner Corporation;
The Greyhound Corporation; Monsanto Chemical Company; Sears,
Roebuck & Company; and U. S. Steel Corporation.20
Other funds come to the CIA through the sale of litera-
ture. The seminar textbook, A Manual for Survival, sells
for three dollars and a donation is required for any informa-
tion from the CLA library. Although Bundy says that the
League does not sell News & Views as a subscription, one
must contribute at least five dollars per year in order to
receive it. Back issues of News & Views may be purchased
for ten cents "if you are a subscriber" and for twenty-five
cents if not; per hundred the price is nine dollars. Friends
20What Is the Church League, pp. 3-7: The following com-plete the list:~TKbEbott Laboratories; American Box Corporationof California; American Hardware Mutual; American Tag Company;Anchor Steel & Conveyor Company; Atlas-Boxmakers, Inc.; TheBastian-Blessing Company; F. A. Bean Foundation, Inc.1 Bell& Zoller Coal Company; Beloit Iron Works; L. M. Berry & Co.;Black & Veatch; Avery Brundage; F. Burkart ManufacturingCompany; The Celanese Foundation, Inc.; Central Cold StorageCompany; Cleveland Builders Supply Company; Darling &Company; Elliott Paint & Varnish Company; Ender Coal andCoke Company; Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Company; Indiana BrassCompany; Iselin-Jefferson Company, Inc.J Joanna WesternMills Company; Milk Bottle Crate Company; Mitchell VeneerCorporation; National-Standard Company; Olson Rug Company;Ottawa Silica Company; Republic Electric Company; RobertsDairy Company; Scholl Manufacturing Company; SecuritiesIncorporated; J. P. Seeburg Corporation; Standard Rate andData Service; Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp.' VictorManufacturing & Gasket Company; Western Felt Works;Wisconsin Cold Storage Company; Youngberg-Carlson Company.
68
are encouraged to purchase and distribute News & Views by
the thousands,21
The CIA does not purport to be "a cure all," but claims
it is "prepared to do a job . .0* where the potential reach
is great--and where no one else is working. . . . For that
reason [the CLA is] entitled to support."22
Bundy's major emphasis in CLA work is exposing Commu-
nism in the churches and educational institutions, He
believes church infiltration by Communists, fellow-travelers,
and dupes began with liberal theologians. These he charac-
terizes as disciples of the nineteenth century German
"school of higher criticism, rationalism, humanism, and
communism [emphasis added]," which substitutes a naturalistic
philosophy of religion in place of a miraculous supernatural
Christianity based on a literal interpretation of the Bible.
CLA literature continually points out that a minister need
not be a Communist Party member to do a Communist's work;
all he need do is reject "the divine, Supernatural and
Miraculous plan of salvation as laid down in God's Holy Word,
and substitute his own humanistic, rationalistic, and materi-
alistic philosophy."2 3 There is no record in government
21News & Views, May, 1961, p. 4; Price List for Publi-cationsoftTFie Church League of AmericaT(Wheaton,~ITlinois,fn.d.),~pp.~14-15; Letter fr5oii Edgar C. Bundy, May 5, 1962.
22What Is the Church League, p. 4
2 3 News & Views, April, 1962, p. 2.
69
files, Bundy says, of a fundamentalist minister aiding or
abetting the Communist movement in any manner, including
signing "Communist-inspired" petitions. To the contrary, he
says, ministers who aid Communists are religious liberals
and, in fact, "COMMUNISM AND THEOLOGICAL MODERNISM are as
ONE!"24 Bundy believes that before any man in the field of
religion can embrace Marxism he must first become a liberal,
modernist, humanist, or naturalist.25
Bundy tells his followers to expect the liberals and
modernists to dislike fundamentalists and hate the word
"fundamentalist," for it means one who adheres both to the
fundamental teachings of the Bible and to the fundamentals
upon which our forefathers founded this nation. He regards
the founding fathers as Pilgrims and Puritans--seventeenth
century religious dissenters who left England and came to
America for one purpose: "To worship God in spirit and in
truth without any state or ecclesiastical oppressors to tell
them what they had to do." They gave us the first textbook,
which taught children "In Adam's fall, we sinned all." They
were characterized by their courage, ruggedness, individu-
alism, with a "Bible under one arm, with a musket under the
other, and the 'TRUTH.'" They were willing to brave the
dangers of an uncharted wilderness, full of savage natives
24News & Views, December, 1962, p. 1.
25News & Views, August, 1957, pp. 3-4.
70
and animals, Bundy concludes, so that present-day Americans
might have a Christian heritage.26
The extent to which Communism has infiltrated American
churches, theological schools, and religious publishing
houses is presented in Bundy's Collectivism in the Churches.
It is lauded as a documented account of the "left-wing
political activities" of the Federal, National, and World
Councils of Churches, written so that the minister may inform
his congregation of the "well-planned, determined methods"
being used to destroy America's "basic liberties."27
The main target of Bundy's attack is the National
Council of Churches (NCC) which, along with other ecumenical
agencies, merged with the Federal Council in 1950. He is
willing to testify under oath before a congressional investi-
gating agency that the NCC is "one of the greatest enemies
in regard to national security." 28 His usual method of
exposing the intent of the NCC is to discuss some high-
ranking churchman, including his "Communist front record."29
A typical example of such a churchman is G. Bromley
Oxnam, until his death in 1963 considered by Bundy to be
representative of the "popular, radical, pro-Communistic
26News & Views, July, 1962, pp. 1-2, 9; August, 1957,p. 1.
27News & Views, February, 1958, p. 1.
28New York Times, February 19, 1960, p. 8.
29Edgar C. Bundy Collectivism in the Churches (Wheaton,Illinois, 1961), pp. 47-46. News& VTews, February, 1958,p. 2.
71
element in religious circles in America."3 0 Most of the
evidence used by Bundy to prove Oxnam's pro-Communist
activities is taken from a HUAC report on the July, 1953
Oxnam hearing, at which Bundy and leaders of the American
Council of Christian Churches occupied the front row as
guests of Representative Jackson, a HUAC member.31
In discussing Oxnam's record, Bundy includes the HUAC
charge that he was affiliated with the National Council of
American-Soviet Friendship and had participated in a 1942
Boston rally, "Salute to Our Russian Ally." This American-
Soviet Friendship organization, Bundy writes, was "exposed"
and "declared subversive" by HUAC. Bundy was not satisfied
by Oxnam's defense that he, along with other distinguished
Americans, was friendly toward Russia in 1942 because she
was a major ally in World War II. Even though Oxnam cited
General Dwight D. Eisenhower as one of the distinguished
Americans and quoted him as saying, "American-Soviet friend-
ship is one of the cornerstones on which the edifice of
peace should be built," Bundy replied: "Eisenhower was, of
30Carl McIntire, Bish Oxnam, Prophet of Marx (Collings-wood, N.J., [n.d.J), cited in News & Views," Ju1y, 1954, p. 1;A Manual for Survival, p. 130.
31Roy, Communism and the Churches, p. 254; Donner, TheUn-Americans, p. 25b. ~T He~~ly, 1954 News & Views is titled"I Protest,' says Bishop Oxnam," and subtitled T e 'dothprotest too much, methinkst--Shakespeare. "
72
course, at that time a soldier in Europe under New Deal
command."3 2
Occasionally the CLA uses another tactic in dealing
with the NCC: a special report on local clergymen entitled
"Affiliations Record of:. . . ." One such report contained
nine affiliations of Virgil E. Lowder, then Executive Di-
rector of the Council of Churches of Greater Houston. To
illustrate, the first three affiliations were listed as
follows:
Sponsor: Bill of Rights Conference ("Call"July 1-17,71949)
Member: Chicago Ad Hoc. Committee of Welcomefor the Dean of Canterbury (Folder, November, 1948)
Signer of a Statement: Chicago Committee AgainstWar Propaganda.~("EicagoStar," May 8, 1948, page 4).Also Signer of a Protest (Folder, May 21, 1948),
Besides the nine affiliations no information is given, and
the reader is to assume these organizations are Communist
fronts.33
32News & Views, July, 1954, p. 3; A Manual for Survival,pp. 135~TW7.~ Eisenhower made his statement concirring theNational Council for American-Soviet Friendship in November,1945, a year after HUAC cited it as a tool for Communistactivity, while Oxnam participated in its work five yearsbefore it was declared subversive. Yet it is Oxnam, notEisenhower, whom Bundy chooses to consider a Communistsympathizer with a Communist front record. Roy, Communismand the Churches, pp. 257-258; House of Representatives,Guide to Subversive Organizations and Publications(Washington, 1961), pp.117-118.
33"Affiliations Record of Rev. Virgil E. Lowder," SpecialReport of CIA. Concerning this report, Lowder says he "neverhad any sympathy with Communism and has fought it ever sinceit loomed on the international horizon." Most of the organi-zations listed were cited as subversive by HUAC after Lowderis "alleged" to have been associated with them. Letter fromVirgil E. Lowder, April 1, 1963.
73
Bundy claims there are between 7,000 and 8,000 clergymen
in the NCC with similar Communist front records, and has
broken these figures down by denominations, as follows:
Methodist -- 2109Episcopalian -- 1411Congregational -- 1014Baptist -- 660Presbyterian -- 64934
Turning to the "left-wing bias" of the religious press,
Bundy ranks the Christian Centuy, a weekly magazine intended
as a voice of religious liberalism, as the "most radical" of
the "quasi-religious" publications.35 He reached this con-
clusion after examining all the 1957-1958 issues and listing
contributors who had "Communist front records or records of
activity in behalf of Socialist or pacifist enterprises.136
In company with the Communists, Christian Century favors
recognition of Red China and has a very low opinion of anti-
Communist organizations and individuals such as Senators
Bricker, Eastland, and Jenner, Governor Faubus, Chiang Kai-
shek, the Boers of South Africa, the Daughters of the Ameri-
can Revolution, and the Church League of America. In contrast,
A Manual for Survival, p. 131. Bundy agrees withJ. B. Matthews wEd~ in the American Mercury, charged, "Thelargest single group supporting the Communist apparatus inthe United States today is composed of Protestant clergymen."Matthews claims there are 7,000 such clergymen, the samefigure given by Robert Welch, founder of the John Birch So-ciety, in April, 1961. Matthews, "The Reds in Our Churches,"American Mercury, cited in Donner, The Un-Americans, pp. 243-244.
35News & Views, March, 1959, p. 1; A Manual for Survival,p. 142; Bundy, Collectivism in the Churches, p. F7~
36News & Views, March, 1959, p. 1.
74
Christian Century "Just loves" the National Association for
the Advancement of Colored People, Herblock, Fidel Castro,
and Walter Reuther.37
Perhaps of even more assistance to Communism than
Christian C is Union Theological Seminary. Pointing
out that Union Seminary, Columbia University, and Riverside
Church are located on the same block, Bundy remarked, "Birds
of a feather, eh?",8 Of the abundant proofs he finds of
Communist infiltration of Union Seminary, six are discussed
at length. His first substantiation is a 1919 report from
the Joint Legislative Committee of the State of New York
Investigating Seditious Activities. This committee found
Union Seminary to be a dangerous center of "Revolutionary
Socialist teaching," and the school where Harry F. Ward,
who "shows decided sympathy for socialist forms and is
friendly to Bolshevism in Russia," teaches. Bundy adds that
it is now a school of "Professorial Pinkos."39
As his second evidence Bundy cites HUAC's One Hundred
Thing You Should Know About Communism, which singles out
Union Seminary as a school where Communist propagandists are
37 News & Views, March, 1959, pp. 1-6; A Manual forSurvival~p.~I2;FBundy, Collectivism in th- eChurchefs,pT. 21-214.
38New York Times, March 28, 1960, pp. 1, 25; News &Views, February, 1957, pp. 1-4: this issue is entitled''Spawning Ground for Communism."
39News & Views, February, 1957, pp. 1, 5; A Manual forSurvival, .~129_FBundy, Collectivism in the Chirhe,~~pp. 123-126.
75
active. Earl Browder, while head of the Communist Party,
U.S.A., spoke at Union and told the students: "You may be
interested in knowing that we have preachers, preachers
active in the churches, who are members of the Communist
Party."o
Bundy's third proof of Union's Communistic leanings is
that it has "RSV Fronters" on the faculty. Four of the
translators of the NCC-copyrighted Revised Standard Version
are Union faculty members, and two of them have been
associated with subversive organizations
In 1954, the Rockefeller Foundation gave Union Seminary
over $500,000. As his fourth point, Bundy asks, "Was this
to aid in carrying out the program outlined by the Kremlin?14 2
The fact that Union is successful in placing its graduates
in high places in the ecclesiastical world as well as in
government provides Bundy's fifth argument, and John Foster
Dulles is the key. Dulles, associated with the World Council
of Churches and influential in placing Alger Hiss as head of
the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, was a trustee
of Union Seminary while Secretary of State.4 3
Finally, Bundy finds evidence against Union in one of
its graduates, Ralph Lord Roy, the "smear artist" who authored
4oNews & Views, February, 1957, p. 1.4lNews & Views, February, 1957, p. 3.
42News & Views, February, 1957, p. 5.
43News & Views, February, 1957, p. 5; Bundy, Collectiv-ism in te Churches, p. 179.
76
Apostles of Discord and Communism and the Churches.44 Bundy
says the latter was written under a grant of $250,000 from
the "notorious" Fund for the Republic.45 He gives three
possible reasons for Roy's conclusions in Communism and the
Churches: The research was inadequate; he failed to recognize
"Communist influence" when he saw it; he had an "unbending
determination" not to find any appreciable evidence of Commu-
nist infiltration for fear those in the "Liberaloid circles"
would label him with the "smear" word, "anti-Communist."46
Bundy feels Communist infiltration is at least as deep-
rooted in the schools as in the churches. His concern for
education reflects conservative thinking that the school has
been and should always remain a conservative force in so-
ciety. Recognizing the importance of the schools as a con-
servative force, he argues, the Communists began their
infiltration immediately after the Party's founding in 1919.
They seek to subvert America by using the colleges, high
schools, textbooks, and even the National Parent-Teachers
Association to propagate Communism by creating a pro-Soviet
attitude in the student. Bundy feels they have been aided
44News & Views, February, 1957, pp. 5-6.
45The grant actually totaled $500,000.00; $12,521.66 ofthis went to Roy to free him from teaching responsibilitieswhile completing the book. Letter from Hallock Hoffman,Secretary, Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions,The Fund for the Republic, Inc., February 26, 1963.
46News & Views, May, 1961, pp. 1-4; "The Roy Boy,"Special Report of CLA, May, 1961, pp. 1-4; Bundy, Collectiv-ism and the Churches, pp. 245-254.
77
in their task by progressive education ideas, so that both
the collectivists (a term Bundy uses to include Communists,
fellow travelers, and liberals) and their philosophy of
education must be exposed and eradicated from the class-
room. 7
One of the distinctive features of CLA's exposures,
Bundy says repeatedly, is that only documented facts are
presented. In addition to his own research to uncover these
facts, Bundy relies strongly on E. Merrill Root and J. B.
Matthews as authorities on Communism and the schools.
Matthews is best known for his services as research director
of HUAC, and is also credited with introducing the concept
of the fellow traveler (one who unwittingly serves the
causes of Communism). The Communist front record system
which lists all front organizations, petitions, and letter-
heads with which an individual has been associated is also
47A Manual for Survival, pp. 107-108, 111-112; News &Views, September~~T959, pp.-1-6 , September, 1961, pp.1-8~~June, 1962, pp. 1-6; Rossiter, Conservatism in America,pp. 26-27; Iversen, The Communists and the ScEools, pp. 246,359-360; Sidney Hook~~PoitTETa7 Power andPersonal Freedom(New York, 1959), p. 315.
4 80n June 22, 1953 Senator Joseph McCarthy appointedMatthews his chief aide and on July 9, 1953 dismissed himbecause of the criticism which arose over Matthews'article, "The Reds in Our Churches," in which Matthewsaccused 7,000 Protestant clergymen of supporting theCommunist conspiracy. Matthews, "The Reds in Our Churches,"American Mercury, cited in Donner, The Un-Americans,pp. 243-2474.
78
one of his contributions. Because of these, Bundy considers
Matthews "Mr. Anti-Communist."4 9
Of almost equal prominence in the field of Communist
infiltration of education is E. Merrill Root, professor of
English at Earlham College, on the Committee o' Endorsers of
the John Birch Society and associate editor of American
Opinion, Birch Society monthly magazine.5 0 Bundy and Root
are like-minded to such an extent that Root's books and
public addresses on education reflect Bundy's views
exactly.51
At the grand opening of the Church League's new national
headquarters, Root delivered an address on "The Type of
Education which Produced Great American Leadership." This
address summarizes Bundy's view of the education process:
The teacher is to be, above all else, a conservationist; his
function is to conserve. The students should be willing to
9A Manual for Survival, p. 108; Iversen, The Communistsand the~Schools, pp. 241-244; Howard Rushmore, vITr. Anti-Communist," American Mercury, LXXVI (May, 1953), 79-96.
5 0 Jack Nelson, "What Is the Problem?," NEA Journal,
LII (May, 1963), 20.
5 1 CLA publicizes Root's books, opinions, and reviews.
For example: E. Merrill Root, "A Criticism of My Critics,"
Special Report of CLA, April 1, 1963; Mark Graubard, MarxistBrainwashing in Our High Schools: A Review of ProfessorETMeTrill Root' i~b~6~61?k BRANWAshTNG IN THE HIG-SCHOOLS ~(Wheaton, Illinois, 1961); Medford EvansTAre School Text-
books Aiding in the Destruction of the American Republic?"(a review of Brainwashing in the High Schools), News & Views,September, 1961; E. Merrill~Root, "7The Type of Educationwhich Produced Great American Leadership," News & Views,March, 1963.
79
learn as did Abraham Lincoln--without federal aid, air-
conditioning, "gimmicks and gadgets." The subjects should
emphasize heroic and great Americans such as Nathan Hale,
John Paul Jones, Commodore Perry, Ulysses S. Grant, Admiral
Dewey, and Douglas MacArthur.52
Bundy considers Root's Collectivism on the Campus,
published in 1955, and Brainwashing in the g Schools,
published in 1958, to be the best written and most reliable
books on Communist subversion in education.53 In these
books, Root pictures the student's mind as the target for a
three-pronged attack: one by the Communists, another by the
fellow travelers, and a third by the liberals.
Immediately after World War II it became popular among
some to single out college professors who had been Party
members; in Collectivism on the p Root is continuing
this practice by basing his evidence largely on Matthews'
files. The history of Dirk J. Struik, many years a pro-
fessor of mathematics at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (MIT), is considered by Root representative of
the typical Communist professor. Struik illustrates every
phase of Communist activities in the universities: he was a
Marxist; he used his mathematics courses to indoctrinate
52News & Views, March, 1963, pp. 1-4.
53He lists these books among the five most important onthe subject of Communism. Price List, p. 25. About 10,000of each title have been sold to date. Letter from Martin I.Cooley, official, The Devin-Adair Co., February 28, 1963.
80
Communist ideology; he was not disciplined by the adminis-
tration of MIT even after Herbert Philbrick "certified" him
as a Communist, instead, the "state liberals" supported
Struik in defense of academic freedom. Since few deny
Struik was a Marxist who actively supported Communist causes,
Root asks why he was allowed to remain at MIT where he could
subvert students' minds. Were the administrators pro-
Communist? How many students of his are now active tools of
the Party? Did those who supported Struik realize that they
too were guilty of aiding Communism? Root concludes that
history alone will tell how many students were led by Struik
"down the road to Communism, from which they were unable to
return until they had performed acts against their country."54
Root finds other evidence of subversion in universities
which allow Communists to speak on their campuses under the
guise of "academic freedom." Archie Brown, key demonstrator
against the 1960 HUAC hearings in San Francisco, spoke at
Berkeley and Stanford in 1960, and Gus Hall, general secre-
tary of the Communist Party, U.S.A., spoke at the Universities
of Oregon and Washington in February, 1960. Root wonders
whether the administrators of these schools realized they
were allowing Communists an opportunity to undermine faith
in God, America's system of law and order, and the Constitution.
54E. Merrill Root, Collectivism on the Campus: The Battlefor the Mind in American Colleges (New York, 1955), pp. 82-93citing~~The AnFiuial Reor ofthe Committee on Un-American Ac-tivities,1951. It has never been proven legTly that Struikwas a Party member. Iversen, The Communists and the Schools,pp. 170-171.
81
Instead of promoting academic freedom by allowing Communists
on the speaker's platform and in the classroom, the universi-
ties of today are committing, in Bundy's words, "academic
suicide."55
Although Bundy and Root grant that there were and are
now only a few Communist professors, they point out that for
every Party member there are between five and ten who,
"wittingly or unwittingly, what does it matter?" do the
Communists' work. How does one identify such a fellow
traveler? First, check HUAC reports and the Attorney
General's Guide to Subversive Organizations and Publications,
1951. Then ask the suspected fellow traveler to name ten
things wrong with America and two things wrong with Russia.
"He will be on Russia's side every time."56
Root thinks the best example of a fellow traveler is
Herbert Naboisek, research psychologist at the University of
California, who refused to counter the "alien conspiracy"
and took the Fifth Amendment when questioned by a HUAC in-
vestigator of Communism in California schools.
The "dupe" is another type who unwittingly serves Commu-
nism. He considers himself a neutralist, but the "neutralist
or soft thinker is witless, and less a fellow traveler than
55News & Views, June, 1962, pp. 1-6.
56A Manual for Survival, p. 35; Root, Collectivism on
the Campus, pp. 141-W3.0This technique originates from
HUC's 100 Things You Should Know About Communism, pp. 15-16.When Bundy uses thismethod he occasionally concludes that
the person is a Communist rather than a fellow traveler.
82
a dupe." 57 As an example of a dupe, Root names William
Gellerman, professor of education at Northwestern. In 1944
Gellerman wrote a book in which he attacked Martin Dies, who
was then "a pioneer in the dangerous field of anti-Communism."
In writing this book, Root believes, Gellerman was serving
the Communist Party better than if he had been a member.
Further evidence of "ignorance in high places," that is,
dupes who serve the cause by failing to recognize Communist
invasion of universities, is found in Dwight Eisenhower. In
1948, while president of Columbia University, he accepted a
grant of money from the "Sovietized puppet government of
occupied Poland" and then, Root continues, allowed that
government to appoint Manfred Kridl, a "pro-Communist apolo-
gist," to a chair in Polish literature. For this reason,
Eisenhower is portrayed as a tool of Moscow.58
In Collectivism on the Campus, Root has provided a con-
venient check on teachers who took the Fifth Amendment before
congressional investigating committees in a table on Commu-
nist Party membership reproduced from "Subversive Influence
in the Educational Process," a report of the Jenner Committee
on Interlocking Subversion in the American Government.5 9
57Root, Collectivism on the Campus, p. 143.
58Root, Collectivism on the Cam us, pp. 183-185. Thisconcept seems to have origlhnated W 1hAllen Zoll's NationalCouncil for American Education Red-ucator Series: Red-ucators at Columbia University. Iversen, The Communiistsand the Schools, pp,.243-245.
59Root, Collectivism on the C pp. 143, 385-390.
83
After completing his study of college professors, Root
turned his attention to their textbooks. When "honest
people" examine them critically, they will unmistakingly
find that the "collectivist long ago moved in on the text-
book. 6O As their prime illustration, Bundy and Root both
repeatedly cite the Cornell University publication USSR, A
Concise Handbook, a series of twenty essays on contemporary
Russian civilization which first appeared as separate arti-
cles in The Encyclopedia Americana. Root condemns USSR for
several reasons. He considers at least fifteen of the con-
tributors pro-Soviet. His prize exhibit is Vladimir
Kazakevitch, frequent writer for Russky Golos, Russian
language journal, and a Soviet agent who fled the United
States just as he was about to be arrested. Root finds very
suspicious the failure to mention the role of the secret
police in Russia, her complete suppression of all human
liberties, and her slave labor camps. Although Cornell
withdrew the text in 1954 Root considers the harm irreparable,
for it was used for years at Bucknell, Rutgers, Swarthmore,
California, Chicago, Michigan, and Yale, and the articles
are still available in old editions of the Americana.6 1
60Root, Collectivism on the Campus, p. 200.
6lThis attack on USSR initially came from J. B. Matthews'
"Tactics and Methods of Communism in America," a HardingCollege Freedom Forum Presentation, May 2, 1952. Root, Col-lectivism on the Campus, pp. 2 00-20 4 ; A Manual for Survival,p. 117. Concerning this and similar c arges, Iversen writes,"There is not the slightest evidence that any commerciallypublished text was designed to promote a Soviet America."Iversen, The Communists and the Schools, p. 363.
84
In addition to the professors and textbooks, "state
liberals" are assaulting the minds of college students. Root
describes a state liberal as one who believes that government,
rather than the individual, is the best means for advancing
social, political, and economic justice at all levels of
society, and "the candid mind must admit that sometimes . .
the state liberals come perilously close to endorsing the
Communist Party." One "foremost" state liberal, Arthur M.
Schlesinger, Jr., then Harvard historian, came close in 1946
when he wrote that he looked "wistfully" at Russia, de-
siring, Root infers, socialization of American society into
a "collectivist pattern." 62
Almost all of America's schools are dominated by state
liberalism's collectivistic thinking; particularly, Root
believes, Yale, Wisconsin, and Southern Methodist. For
instance, K. S. Templeton, former graduate student at Wis-
consin, related to Root that books on the reserve shelves at
the University's library were "largely collectivist"; his
course work under Merle Curti, Wisconsin historian, was of a
"collectivist nature"; and his final thesis was "openly
branded" by Curti as an "apology for the National Associ-
ation of Manufacturers." The same atmosphere exists at
Southern Methodist, as reported by Donald Allen Waite, then
a graduate student in the education department:
In the final of philosophy of education, he [theinstructor] asked if we thought it fair to administer
62Root, Collectivism on the ppp. 4, 218-220.
85
the loyalty oaths. All the rest of the gentle darlingsno doubt passively acquiesced [in opposition to theoaths], but not me. Other questions too were loaded infavor of his socialism-communism, but I answered themall according to the spirit of a true believer in freeenterprise. Do you know what he wrote across the topof my paper? "Authoritarian and illogical." 3
The total effect of these frontal assaults on the mind
is well summarized by Root: they are "softening us up for
the easy kill of Communism."64
To combat this onslaught of Communism, Root has de-
veloped a program which, if immediately acted upon by every
loyal American, will at least give the conservative student
or professor a fair hearing.
First, every patriot should support the professors who
have upheld the "individualist revolution." Some of these
professors are: Bruce W. Knight at Dartmouth; Anthony T.
Bouscaren of the University of San Francisco; William E.
Warner of Ohio State; A. H. Hobbs of the University of
Pennsylvania; Richard Weaver of the University of Chicago;
Donald Davidson of Vanderbilt; and Russell Kirk, formerly of
Michigan State.
Second, encourage universities to follow the example of
Harding College, Searcy, Arkansas, or Bloomfield College and
Seminary, Bloomfield, New Jersey. One of Bloomfield's recent
circulars setting forth requirements for its professors,
63Root, Collectivism on the Campus, pp. 220-221, 233,239-240.
64Letter from E. Merrill Root, March 3, 1963.
86
stated that applicants should have "positive loyalty to
American political ideals and traditions. Reds, pinks, near-
pinks and 'fellow travelers' will not fit into the policy of
Bloomfield."
Third, every parent should write the college his child
will attend and ask the president, "Is there a Communist on
your faculty? . . . Have you on your faculty fifty per cent
who passionately and articulately believe in free enterprise
and individualism?" If 10,000 parents would do this im-
mediately, Root challenges, there soon would be colleges
that practice academic freedom.
Fourth, alumni should not give "a cent" to colleges
which have a Communist or a Fifth Amendment teacher, or do
not have fifty per cent of their faculty supporting free
enterprise.
Finally, ask each college president to question his
faculty as to whether they include in their outside reading
assignments The Freeman, The American Mercury, Human Events,
or books by Freda Ulley, Ludwig von Mises, F. A. Hayek,
James Burnham, Arthur Koetler, and Max Eastman, and whether
they themselves have read William Buckley's God and Man at
Yale.65
65Root, Collectivism on the Cam us, pp. 240-241, 363,366-367, 369, 376, 3bU-32; News &!Views, March, 1963,pp. 1-4, September, 1961, ppTT~87; Rook, Political Power andPersonal Freedom, pp. 315-317. Rossiter says most of themagazines, newspapers, and authors named by Root are favor-ites of the ultra-conservatives. Rossiter, Conservatism inAmerica, pp. 171-173, 177-178.
87
In contrast to its work with churches and schools, the
CLA has little to say about the contemporary problem of the
Negro and integration. It does distribute two pamphlets,
however, entitled Communism and the NAACP, Vols. I and 2,
and Ten Directors of the NAACP. These pamphlets were
published by the Georgia Commission on Education in 1958 and
appear to be the work of J. B. Matthews and Myers G. Lowman,
executive secretary of Circuit Riders, Inc. Lowman was
secretly commissioned by the Attorney General of Georgia for
six months work at a fee of $4,500, to investigate NAACP
activities in that state.66 The pamphlets warn the white
Southerner that the Communists have as their goals the "con-
fiscation without compensation of the property of the white
capitalists" and racial amalgamation. To accomplish these
goals the Communists are using the NAACP as an effective
tool.67 In Ten Directors, the name of each is followed by a
list of his associations with Communist fronts. By way of
illustration, Eleanor Roosevelt's name was followed by fifty-
seven fronts, of which these five are typical:
Eleanor Roosevelt, Board of Directors, NAACP:() All-Harlem Youth Conference -- sent greetings
-- Dail Worker, May 12, 1938(J American Committee for Protection of Foreign
Born -- sponsor -- Daily Worker, October 21, 1941, page 4
6 6 Atlanta Constitution, August 2, 1958, p. 1; AtlantaJournal, August3, 195,p I. 1; Atlanta Journal-Constitution,August 10, 1958, p. 5.
67Communism and the NAACP (author not given), Vol. 1 of2 vols. (Atlanta,~T95T~ pp. 5, 7-46; Communism and the NAACP(author not given), Vol. 2 of 2 vols. (Atlanta, 1958T,pp. 1-100.
88
(3) American Committee for Protection of ForeignBorn -- sponsor of dinner -- program, October 27, 1946
(4) American Committee for Protection of ForeignBorn -- signer of open letter -- folder, 1947
(5) American Committee for Spanish Freedom -- sentmessage to -- Daily Worker, November 23, 1945, page 8
The list continues through all fifty-seven citations.68
While Eleanor Roosevelt's front record is discussed in
company with many others, her husband became the symbol of
governmental association with Communism. The CIA maintains
that the year 1934 was a turning point in American history.
Prior to that date there was little evidence of Communist
infiltration of government, yet by 1937 it would have been
impossible to find a single government agency without at
least one secret Red employee.6 9
By gaining influence in key policy-making positions,
Communists and their sympathizers were able to weaken the
security of the United States, Bundy believes. He sees an
example of Communist success in a 1938 agreement between the
United States and the Soviet Union allowing Siberian Eskimos
to visit their cousins in Alaska during whaling season. He
6 8 Ten Directors of the NAACP (author not given) (Atlanta,1957), 7P. 17-20. The American Committee for Protection ofForeign Born was cited by HUAC as an auxiliary of the Commu-nist Party, June 25, 1942; subversive and Communist, June 1, 1948;under the "complete domination" of the Communist Party,February 11, 1957. House of Representatives, 87th Congress,2nd Session, Guide to Subversive Organizations and Publications,Report of Committee on Un-American Activities (Washington,1961), p. 18.
69A Manual for Survival, pp. 83-84; News & Views,July, 1962, pp. 1-9. Rossiter finds a chief characteristicof the ultra-conservative is that he is anti-Roosevelt.Rossiter, Conservatism in America, p. 165.
89
is certain that the Russian secret police had agents among
the Eskimos spying on military installations in Alaska.70
Meanwhile, back in Washington, infiltrators were able
to persuade the United States to support "a group of decadent
and decrepit governments in western Europe" rather than the
more important Far East Asian countries. They helped convince
the United States to give China to the Communists by with-
drawing needed financial support from the Chiang Kai-shek
government. Such events do not surprise Bundy, however,
for President Roosevelt once said to Martin Dies, 1939 HUAC
chairman, "There is nothing wrong with the Communists, some
of my best friends are Communists.72
The most frequently-used illustration of Communists in
high government positions is Alger Hiss. Variously described
as a Harvard graduate, "celebrated friend of the Red Con-
spiracy in the State Department,"' and a key figure in the
NCC, Hiss was not discovered and exposed by the FBI, as
commonly supposed, but rather by HUAC. Bundy deplores those
who, "despite the overwhelming evidence," believe Alger Hiss
7 0House of Representatives, Committee on Appropri-ations, p. 606; A Manual for Survival, pp. 33-b5; News &Views, August, 1957, pp. VL.
7lHouse of Representatives, Committee on A ro ri-ations, pp. 592-601; A Manual for SurviVaI, pp.U-9.
7 2 A Manual for Survival, p. 83.
90
was innocent and was smeared by HUAC. "It is obvious that
one cannot reason with such obstinate mentality'"73
Bundy considers the FBI and the congressional investi-
gating agencies the most important safeguards America has.
He quotes J. Edgar Hoover as saying the aims and responsi-
bilities of the FBI and HUAC are "the same," but the methods
of operation differ. Since the FBI cannot make public any
of its investigative finds and HUAC can, Bundy sees HUAC as
vital to the nations security. Indeed, Bundy affirms, it
renders a "distinct service when it publicly reveals the
diabolic machinations of sinister figures engaged in un-
American activities."?'4
The CLA head tells of a case in which the limitation of
FBI activity could have created a serious problem for the
United States, had it not been for the Senate Sub-Committee
on Internal Security, another investigating agency which can
publicly reveal its information. The FBI on several oc-
casions sent information to the White House revealing that
Harry Dexter White, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, was
a high-ranking agent of the "International Communist Con-
spiracy." President Truman did nothing to remove White and
later denied receiving any such report. Hoover, Bundy says,
was then called to testify publicly before the Sub-Committee
73A Manual for Survival, pp. 83, 164-165; News & Views,May, 1952, pp. 1-5, October, 1962, pp. 1-6.
74 j. Edgar Hoover, testimony before HUAC, March 26, 1947,cited in A Manual for Survival, pp. 143, 159.
91
on Internal Security, where he reported that the FBI had
sent several warnings to the White House of White's Commu-
nist activities. It is this exposure of subversive elements
in American society, Bundy holds, that makes the investi-
gative committees more hated and feared than any other
security organization in the country.75
Bundy reminds his readers that citizens can attend in-
vestigative hearings in person or secure copies of the com-
plete hearings free from their Congressmen or for only a few
pennies from the Government Printing Office. At what he
terms a "great expense," Bundy reprints and sells copies of
HUAC reports. For instance, the CLA reprinted Issues Pre-
sented by Air Reserve Center Training Manual and The House
Committee on Un-American Activities: What It Is, What It
Does. The latter was reprinted in the News & Views format
and entitled "Operation Elimination." Bundy asked his
readers to purchase "thousands of extra copies" of this
issue--at twenty-two dollars per hundred--and distribute
them "to every member in your church, civic club, every
teacher, principal, superintendent and school board member,
and to your neighbor, milkman, paperboy, garbage collector,
meter reader, groceryman, washwoman, and filling station
attendant." His readers were even told to "buy time on local
radio and television stations and read it to the public." 76
75A Manual for Survival, pp. 160-161, 163.
76A Manual for Survival, pp. 160-164; News & Views,September,9 p.~ 1; Price List, p. 17.
92
Bundy believes that the greatest attack to date by the
Communists and their sympathizers on any investigative com-
mittee of Congress occurred in the Communist-led student
riots against HUAC. This attack, CLA literature reports,
was led by a left-wing front for Communism, the American
Civil Liberties Union.7 7 Stating that the HUAC film "Oper-
ation Abolition" shows an on-the-scene Communist-led riot
intended to disrupt HUAC hearings, Bundy asks why the Civil
Liberties Union should oppose the public showing of this
film.78 He thinks so highly of "Operation Abolition," a
film that will shake "the lethargic daylights out of those
who have been brain washed into thinking it can't happen
here," that he purchased two copies which Church Leaguers
may rent for ten dollars a day.79 This film, Bundy asserts,
shows that it will happen here and our children will be
living under Communism unless we do something about it.
What can one person do? Plenty, says Bundy, if he re-
solves to do something positive and constructive each week
77George Washington Robnett, CLA Director for the Insti-tute of Special Research, also claims that "fully 80% of itsACLU] efforts are on behalf of Communists who have come into
conflict with the law." News & Views, July, 1961, pp. 1-2, 4.
78News & Views, July, 1961, p. 1. He fails to mentionACLU's fTim WOperation Correction," which claims that "Oper-ation Abolition" is a distorted propaganda film.
79News & Views, September, 1960, p. 1. As of May 6, 1961700 copies of "Operation Abolition" had been circulated to anestimated 15 million viewers. M. Stanton Evans "Just Who'sDistorting What?," National Review (May 6, 19615, reproducedby the CLA (Wheaton, Illinois, /n.d.7). See Appendix C fora list of CLA films.
93
of the year. To aid the student, Bundy has outlined a
twelve-step program which will keep him active throughout
the year.
Informing oneself of Communist philosophy, strategy,
and tactics is the first and most essential step. This is
to be accomplished by reading and thoroughly understanding
the annual reports of HUAC and the Sub-Committee on Internal
Security, plus a minimum of five or six of the following
government reports: Guide to Subversive Organizations and
Publications; Soviet Total War; The Communist Party of the
U.S., A Handbook for Americans; Communist Strategy of Pro-
tracted Conflict; House Committee on Un-American Activities,
What It Is, What It Does, 1958. It is desirable also that
the student read three or four books from a list of twelve
the CLA considers the best published on the nature of Commu-
nism,80 Bundy emphasizes the necessity of this basic step:
If you do not have the time or the patience to dothis elementary preparatory reading you cannot possiblyjoin the fight for America. It is suggested that in-stead you make as liberal and as frequent financial
80The twelve books are: Whittaker Chambers, Witness;Louis Budenz, Techniques of Communism; W. Cleon Skousen, TheNaked Communist; William Kintner, ThE Front Is Everywhere;Edgar C. Bundy, Collectivism in the~Uhurches;FRobert Straus-Hupe, Protracted Conflict; James Burnham, Web of Subversion;Felix Wittmer, Conquest of the American Mind; AnthonyBouscaren, Guide to Anti-Commuinist Action; Edward Hunter,Brainwashing from~Pavlov to Powers; Stefan T. Possony,Century of Conflict; Henry Atkinson, E of War. A Manualfor Survival, pp. 201, 213-215. Henry RegneryDevin-Adair,and Bookmailer are the publishers of six of these books.Clinton Rossiter considers them and the authors ultra-conservative. Rossiter, Conservatism in America, pp. 170-172.
94
contributions to the fight and let others betterqualified do the fighting for you. 8 1
The student who can buy and read more is instructed, in
step two, to subscribe to "at least" one or two newsletters,
newspapers, or magazines from among the following: American
Legion; Bookmailer News;82 Christian Beacon (put out by Carl
McIntire, and described as the best paper on Socialism and
Communism in religion); News & Views; Dan Smoot Report;
Human Events; National Review; and U. S. News and World
Report.83
Since the Communists and their "vast crop of concealed
supporters" are tireless workers, literally working "sixteen
hours or more a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year,"
the anti-Communists must work equally hard if America is to
be saved. Therefore Bundy exhorts the student not to attempt
to fight Communism alone, but, as a third step, to join a
"reputable" anti-Communist organization and actively support
it.84
81A Manual for Survival, p. 201.
82Lyle Hugh Munson, a former CIA agent, founded Book-mailer, Inc. in 1953 as a mail order bookstore which special-izes in literature for the American right. Located at232 E. 35th, New York 16, N.Y., its publication, BookmailerNews, tells.of new and reprinted books of interest to theconservative. Richard Dudman, Men of the Far g (NewYork, 1962), pp. 142-144.
83A Manual for Survival, pp. 201, 214.
84 A Manual for Survival, p. 204.
95
As his fourth activity, the anti-Communist is to make a
selection from the CLA suggested book list and "insist" that
the librarians of his community purchase the book and make it
available to library users. Warning the student that some
librarians with "secret pro-Communist sympathies" may refuse
to permit such books in the library, he is encouraged to use
considerable pressure and persuasion until success is at-
tained.
Step five suggests enclosing leaflets advertising an
anti-Communist book, seminar, or campaign in each piece of
mail. This can be done without additional postage since the
enclosures seldom exceed the full ounce paid for. Capital-
izing on free media brings the student to step six: writing
letters to newspapers, answering any "pro-Soviet and un-
American" communications and exposing the Communists' use of
the "Letters" columns.
If no local anti-Communist organization exists, step
seven calls for establishing such an organization, along with
a well-located reading room stocked with "counter-subversive"
reading materials. Bundy suggests in step eight that the
student place copies of pamphlets, newsletters, and government
reports in doctors' waiting rooms. Step nine calls for the
use of subscriptions of News & Views as gifts.
As his tenth act the student should encourage and in-
sist on the use of anti-Communist speakers at civic affairs
and other meetings. In step eleven the student is asked to
96
write to radio and television sponsors, movie theaters, and
other entertainment agencies which employ Communist script
writers, producers, or actors, or "Fifth Amendment witnesses,"
and ask that something be done about it.
Finally, step twelve calls for the reader to be loyal to
all anti-Communists for, as Bundy says, tian attack on one is
an attack on all." The student must allow no one to slur
the FBI, HUAC, SSIS, the CIA, the ICCC, the ACCC, or any
other anti-Communist organization.
In proceeding with any of these steps, Bundy warns,
"above all" be sure you "know your facts." If there is any
doubt concerning the subversiveness of an individual or
organization, write "your Congressman and have him get the
information" from HUAC.85
The Church League is careful to deal only with what it
considers documented facts and, through its publications and
seminars, concentrates on revealing the Communism subversion
of churches and schools. In order to most effectively reveal
this subversion, Bundy has outlined a specific plan of action
for patriotic Americans who wish to "Join in this spiritual
warfare against the greatest enemy of mankind."8 6
85A Manual for Survival, p. 207.
86A Manual for Survival, p. 13.
CHAPTER IV
CARL McINTIRE AND THE AMERICAN COUNCIL
OF CHRISTIAN CHURCHES
McIntire, in accord with Bundy, is primarily concerned
with America's spiritual warfare against Communism. Against
the attacks of godless Communism on capitalism, private
enterprise, and individualism, he has formed a fundamentalist
church council--the American Council of Christian Churches.1
Carl McIntire, dominant personality behind the ACCC,
was born of Presbyterian parents in Ypsilanti, Michigan in
1906, and raised in Durant, Oklahoma. After receiving his
B.A. degree at Park College, Parkville, Missouri in 1927,
McIntire attended Princeton Theological Seminary until the
Seminary faculty split in 1929 during the Fundamentalist-
Modernist controversy of the twenties. Several faculty
members, led by the eminent fundamentalist J. Gresham Machen,
left Princeton and formed Westminster Theological Seminary.
McIntire followed his former professor and graduated from
Westminster in 1931.2
1Christian Beacon, June 27, 1963, p. 1; May 23, 1963,p. 8. The Christian Beacon is published weekly at Collingswood,New Jersey.
2Sowing Dissension in the Churches, The National Council,Protestant Episcopalhurch~New York, /n.d.j), p. 7; Testi-mony to Christ and A Witness for Freedom (author not given)TCoTlingswood, N.1., 1962), p.~3.
97
98
After McIntire's graduation, he and Machen formed the
Independent Board of Presbyterian Foreign Missions in oppo-
sition to the mission program of the Presbyterian Church in
the tt.S.A. Of the latter McIntire said, "I could not support
a board which I knew was engaged in propaganda contrary to
the Gospel of Christ."3 In support of their action, McIntire
and Machen prepared briefs demonstrating that mission money
from the Presbyterian Church was being used in China to
support institutions and publications which were promoting
"Communist propaganda."
In 1933 McIntire became pastor of a large Presbyterian
Church in Collingswood, New Jersey, and the following year
his difficulties with the Presbyterian denomination came to
a climax when the Independent Board of Presbyterian Foreign
Missions was ordered by the Presbyterian General Assembly to
cease functioning. McIntire refused to obey this order and,
in 1936, was tried before the Presbyterian Synod and found
guilty on three counts.
Before the General Assembly voted to dismiss him from
the ministry, McIntire led his Collingswood congregation in
June, 1936 in renouncing jurisdiction of the Presbyterian
Church in the U.S.A., and, along with other fundamentalist
ministers, formed a new denomination: the Bible Presbyterian
Church. The General Synod of the newly-formed groups
promptly declared null and void the trial and verdict of the
3Christian Beacon, March 24, 1960, pp. 1, 8.
99
Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. McIntire was then re-
ordained in his Collingswood church, now renamed the Bible
Presbyterian Church. For this reason McIntire says those
who speak of him as a defrocked minister are in error.
In September, 1941, the Bible Presbyterian Church and
another small denomination, the Bible Protestant Church,
formed the American Council of Christian Churches. It was
designed to be a "haven to fundamental Protestants not at
home in the inclusive Federal Council" and continues as a
"Biblical alternative to the successor of the Federal Council
--the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the
U*S*Ao"
The purpose of the ACCC is to:
(1) unify those Protestants who believe in an inerrant
Bible, so as to provide a pure testimony for fundamental
churches;
(2) project a united stand against religious modernism,
notably the NCC;
(3) expose Communist and near-Communist infiltration
of the churches;
(4) oppose every system alien to the Bible;
(5) proclaim unashamedly the whole counsel of God.5
4Testimony to Christ, p. 3. See Appendix D for member-ship statistics of the ACCC.
5The Great Divide (author not given) (New York, Ln.d.J),p. 4; Constitution and By-Laws of the American Council ofChristian Churches ~(New Yoik,[nd~7j, ppI-4.
100
Concerning patriotism, the ACCC points out that their's
is "the AMERICAN Council of Christian Churches, and is on
record over and over again as in favor of our AMERICAN free
enterprise system, capitalistic system, as opposed to all
UN-AMERICAN planned economic, socialistic systems."6
Entering the religious conflict on the international
scene, McIntire established the International Council of
Christian Churches in 1948 in opposition to the World
Council of Churches. The fifty persons who attended the
ICCC's first meeting in Amsterdam elected McIntire president,
a position he has held since that time. Since 1948, the
ACCC and ICCC have followed the policy of holding their
meetings in the same locality and at the same time as the
larger ecumenical NCC and WCC.7
McIntire's own groups have experienced dissension in
the ranks, for shortly after formation of the Bible Presby-
terian Church the Orthodox Presbyterian Church withdrew from
the new denomination over doctrinal differences, and the
Evangelical Presbyterian Church withdrew because of disa-
greement on church policy toward modernism, apostasy, Commu-
nism, and the NCC. In 1956, McIntire's denomination, the
Bible Presbyterian Church, withdrew from the ACCC and the
ICCC, protesting "undemocratic leadership" and McIntire's
6Must Freedom Perish? (author not given) (New York,n. d.7,~p. y.
7Ralph Lord Roy, Apostles of Discord (Boston, 1953),p. 191.
101
claim to have far more ACCC and ICCC members than Bible
Presbyterian Church leaders said could be accounted forA
Despite this dissension, even McIntire's critics
recognize him as an intelligent man with considerable
talent.9 While remaining the driving force behind the ACCC
and ICCC, he heads several independent, or separated,
schools and missions--for McIntire is perhaps best described
as a "separatist." He insists on "separation from churches
or churchmen that do not hold to the purified faith," and
continually urges others to separate themselves from their
established churches, To this end, McIntire has written
eleven books and numerous pamphlets, all dealing with the
apostasy into which he believes most churches have fallen.
For example, in the book Servants of Apostasy he "thoroughly
and devastatingly" exposes the "confusion and disaster" of
the Christian church.1 0
Concerned not only with church apostasy, McIntire be-
lieves we are witnessing the "destruction of a great and free
Republic" and employs several methods in connection with
ACCC to awaken the American public to this danger.
8Sowing;Dissension, p. 9.
9 Louis Cassels, "The Rightist Crisis in Our Churches,"
Look, XXVI (April 24, 1962), p. 46; Roy, Apostles of Discord,pp,~186-187.
1 0 Testimony to Christ, pp. 4-5; Sowin Dissension, p. 8;
Carl McIntire, Servants of Apostasy (Collingswood, N.J.,1955), p. v.
101
He founded and edits the Christian Beacon, a weekly
eight-page tabloid-size religious newspaper with a subscrip-
tion price of two dollars a year. It has a weekly circulation
of 37,000, and is sent to many colleges and seminaries, every
state in the Union, and 87 foreign countries.11 Though not
the official paper of the ACCC, the Christian Beacon is its
"outstanding spokesman and defender," and its purpose is to
defend the faith, expose unbelief, challenge compromise, and
warn against "godless, atheistic Communismi12 The Beacon
is made up of articles on current events written by McIntire
or photographically reproduced from other sources, speeches,
letters, sermons by friend and foe alike, and a weekly Bible
lesson for Sunday Schools. The name "Christian Beacon" was
chosen, McIntire explains, because "beacon" suggests light,
and the Christian Beacon, in presenting light and truth,
"shines brighter today than ever before." 13 Beginning with
the February 14, 1963 Beacon, a new feature was added--
cartoons by Vic Lockman.l4
Carl McIntire reaches and awakens his largest audience
by radio, through his "20th Century Reformation Hour" daily
1 1 Christian Beacon, January 24, 1963, p. 1; McIntire,Servants of Apostasy, p. 362; Statement by Carl McIntire,Chicago7 Ilinois, December 28, 1962.
12Carl McIntire, Twentieth Century Reformation (Collings-wood, N.J., 1944), p. 181; McIntire, Servt Aostasy,p. 362; Christian Beacon, January 24, 1963, pp. 1, 8.
13Christian Beacon, January 24, 1963, p. 1
14Specimens of Lockman's work may be found in Appendix E.
102
broadcast heard on 495 stations in every state and on a short-
wave station reaching halfway around the world.
Under the sponsorship of the Christian Beacon Press, Inc.
the first broadcast was made over WVCH, Chester, Pennsylvania,
on March 7, 1955. A second station was added in 1958. Since
that date almost two stations a week have been added, and
McIntire's goal for 1963 is to have 600 stations.1 5
Besides giving the ACCC a "more frequent and louder
voice" than the Christian Beacon could provide, the half-
hour broadcast advertises books, pamphlets, and leaflets
which "document and supplement" the information delivered on
the broadcast. Also, on every broadcast "free" literature
is offered to combat the infiltration of Communism into the
churches and government.16
Shortly after McIntire acquired broadcast time on WINB,
a short-wave station located in Red Lion, Pennsylvania which
can be heard throughout most of the Western Hemisphere, the
Federal Communications Commission began an investigation of
the station. The investigation was initiated by the Voice
of America after a ham radio operator in Sweden reported to
the United States Information Agency, Voice of America's
parent agency, that President Kennedy and the United Nations
were being attacked on WINB. McIntire sees the investigation
15 Christian Beacon, August 25, 1960, p. 1; Letter fromCarl McIntire, July 1, 1963.
16Christian Beacon, August 25, 1960, p. 1.
103
as a violation of the First Amendment, which grants freedom
of speech. He feels that he should be allowed to let the
world know there are those in the United States who want
their country to withdraw from the United Nations.17
At its annual spring convention in Long Beach, California
in April, 1963, the ACCC issued a statement that it was in
complete agreement with the 20th Century Reformation Hour,
directed by Carl McIntire. Since the Christian Beacon is
edited by McIntire, the 20th Century Reformation Hour is
directed by McIntire, and the ACCC and ICCC were founded by
McIntire, it may be said that all these organizations are
merely different expressions of one man.l8
Alerting a smaller segment of the public are McIntire's
one-night "protest rallies." These are held throughout the
nation so that McIntire's followers may hear him, in person,
protest the apostasy of the community's churches and present
the "facts" about the Communist conspiracy. He also uses
these opportunities to raise money for new radio stations.
An example of such a rally was the one held in Warren,
Ohio on February 15, 1963. The local civic auditorium had a
17Christian Beacon, April 4, 1963, pp. 1, 2, 8.
18 Christian Beacon, May 2, 1963, p. 3; Ralph Lord Roy,Communism and the CFhurches, Communism in American Life,edited by Cliniton Rossiter (New York, 1960), p. 228: Roydescribes McIntire's association with these organizationsas follows: "He created the . . . groups, has held theirimportant offices, uses his personal periodical, theChristian Beacon, as their mouthpiece, coins their catchphrases, and writes most of their resolutions."
near-capacity crowd of over 2,000 persons. They were there
to hear "Protestants," No. 1 Anti-Communist Clergyman" speak
for two hours on the NCC, the federal government, and the
proposed visit to the United States of clergymen from the
Russian Orthodox Church. Before the "free-will offering"
was taken, $4,000 was pledged to buy radio time on several
new stations.19
When holding a protest rally, McIntire goes to the
people. Now, with the opening of a conference grounds, the
people can go to McIntire. This significant expansion of
McIntire's activities occurred in late 1963 when the
Christian Beacon Press, Inc. purchased for $300,000 the Admi-
ral Hotel, Cape May, New Jersey. The hotel, renamed the
"Christian Admiral," will serve as a "Center of Reformation
Testimony" for Bible conferences and patriotic meetings.
Besides the purchase price, the 532-room hotel required re-
pairs costing $200,000. Through the Beacon, McIntire called
for 5,000 individuals who would give $1,000 each, in order
to raise the entire $500,000. From the purchase date,
November 1, 1962, to May 9, 1963, $226,000 had been received.
Each of the eight floors has a theme, and each room has a
name appropriate to its particular theme. As an illustration,
on the "patriots' floor" can be found the "Patrick Henry
19Christian Beacon, February 21, 1963, pp. 1, 8;February 2b, l963, p. 4.
105
Room," the "General MacArthur Room," and the "John Birch
Room," among others. 2 0
In these various means of educating the public, McIntire
evaluates society and politics from the viewpoint of free
enterprise. Unlike Bundy and Hargis, he has written ex-
tensively on what he considers the biblical basis of the
free enterprise system. Starting with an assumption of the
divine inspiration of the Scriptures, he seeks to demonstrate
that the free enterprise system is the only Christian system
--all others are satanic.21 He believes that Socialism and
Communism have the same goal: "DESTRUCTION OF HUMAN FREEDOM,"
and therefore if political, economic, and religious freedom
is to be preserved the ACCC must reach millions of Ameri-
cans. 22
McIntire's case for the free enterprise system is
unique. Private enterprise is "presupposed and established
in the moral law; that is, in the Ten Commandments."23 In
particular, the command "Thou shalt not steal" demonstrates
man's God-given right to his own property. This law, he
affirms, is the foundation of the capitalistic system. To
20Christian Beacon, November 1, 1962, pp. 1, 8;February 21, 1963, pp. 1, 8; June 6, 1963, pp. 1, 8.
21Carl McIntire, The Rise of the Tyrant: ControlledEconomy vs. Private Enterprise( Collingswood, N.J., 1945),pp. 12-2E7
22Must Freedom Perish?, pp. 1, 3-4, 7.
23McIntire, The Rise of the Tyrant, pp. 13-14.
106
attack the concept of private ownership of property is "to
attack God's law." The right of property is a basic human
right, but in order to acquire property, the individual has
a responsibility to work. Returning to "the most individu-
alistic document that the world has ever seen," McIntire
quotes "the most outstanding capitalistic verse" in the
Bible: "Let him labor, working with his hands the thing
which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.,25
McIntire asserts that by God's standards man works for gain.
Thus, profit motivation and free enterprise emerge as basic
God-given rights.
Along with these rights God has placed upon man the
responsibility for his own food, clothing, housing, education,
and medical care. For this reason McIntire does not want
"government paternalism" with a "czar of American medicine"
to become a reality, and, in "An Open Letter to American
Doctors," has stated his opposition to medical plans
featuring government aid.
His opposition stems from his belief that mants body,
being a creation of God, belongs to God and not to the govern-
ment. "The individual must look after his body," McIntire
declares, "and not permit the State to do it for him."
McIntire believes socialized medicine is part of the "leftist
24McIntire, The Rise of the Tyrant, pp. 13-15.
25Ephesians 4:28. Scripture references are from theKing James Version. Most ACCC members would use no otherversion.
107
dreamers" program for world Communism. He warns the doctors
who are struggling to protect their freedom that the NCC "has
gone on record in favor of proposals involving socialized
medicine." He then appeals to America's doctors to support
him and like-minded men in preserving America's freedoms
against a socialized society.26
Government has authority only to protect the individu-
al's liberty, not to destroy it. Only those restraints upon
society which allow the individual maximum freedom are
justified and any political or economic system which owns,
controls, or regulates the affairs of an individual is
tyrannical.
The income tax is one such system. On July 19, 1962
the Christian Beacon headline read, "Kennedy Administration
Cracks Down on Fundamental Churches." Kennedy, sometimes
referred to as "the czar in Washington," was accused of
harassing Bible-believing churches by having the Internal
Revenue Bureau withdraw tax exemption status from all inde-
pendent churches which are not affiliated with the NCC.2 7
By October 29, 1962 McIntire was ready to launch a
nation-wide Freedom Rally sponsored by the ACCC from Consti-
tution Hall, Washington, D.C. The rally was intended to
2 6Christian Beacon, June 14, 1962, p. 2.
27 Christian Beacon, July 19, 1962, p. 1. When thechurches mentioned by McIntire complied with Internal RevenueBureau regulations they were granted tax exemption status.
io8
mobilize public opinion behind a proposal to repeal the
Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution and thus abolish the
federal income tax.28 McIntire believes the personal income
tax is a threat to religious liberty, for if the federal
government can decide what is or is not a church, then the
individual is not free to gather others with him to form a
church. Two ACCC institutions were investigated by the
Internal Revenue Bureau: Faith Theological Seminary and the
Bible Presbyterian Church. Both lost their tax exempt
status. Although the Bureau later admitted it was in error,
McIntire was not satisfied. He began to look upon any tax
laws which make local churches conform to government
standards as a violation of the separation of church and
state.29
McIntire sees only one means of preserving religious
liberty: the "outright abolition of this entire octopus
which has put his long tenacles about our churches." While
the ACCC recognizes this is not an easily attained goal, it
urges each of its constituents to support the "Liberty
Amendment, " which reads:
Section 1. The Government of the United Statesshall not engage in any business, professional, com-mercial, financial or industrial enterprise except asspecified in the Constitution.
28Christian Beacon, September 27, 1962, pp. 1-8;November 8, 1962, p. 1.
29Christian Beacon, November 8, 1962, pp. 1-3, 8;November 29, 1962, P. .
109
Section 2. The constitution or laws of any State,or the laws of the United States shall not be subjectto the terms of any foreign or domestic agreement whichwould abrogate this amendment.
Section 3. The activities of the United StatesGovernment which violate the intent and purposes ofthis amendment shall, within a period of three yearsfrom the date of the ratification of this amendment, beliquidated and the properties and facilities affectedshall be sold.
Section 4. Three years after the ratification ofthis amendment the sixteenth article of amendment tothe Constitution of the United States shall standrepealed and thereafter Congress shall not levy taxeson personal incomes, estates, and/or gifts.3 0
The ACCC has been working with the National Committee
for Economic Freedom to attach this amendment to the Consti-
tution of the United States. Each ACCC member is to pass
out "Abolish the Income Tax" packets, write his Congressmen
to ask why President Kennedy and the Internal Revenue Bureau
harass fundamentalist churches, and be active on the local
level in getting support for the amendment. As of
July 19, 1962, the legislatures of Wyoming, Texas, Nevada,
Louisiana, Georgia and South Carolina have approved the
"Liberty Amendment,*t31
The ACCC head explains that the abolition of the income
tax will not cause the government's collapse because the
money collected is not used to pay salaries of the armed
forces, to buy armaments, or to pay the salaries of any
government employee, but is used to finance 700 large
government-owned corporations which are split into 3,000
30Christian Beacon, November 8, 1962, pp. 1, 3.
31 Christian Beacon, July 19, 1962, pp. 1-3, 8;November 6, 1962, pp. 5-8.
110
companies and 19,000 businesses. Each of these businesses
competes with all phases of the American free enterprise
system tax free, rent free, and overhead free. In the event
of losses, taxes are raised. Since the value of these
government-owned corporations is between 60 and 100 billion
dollars, they could be sold to private enterprise which
would pay taxes on them, while the proceeds of the sale
could reduce the national debt. McIntire estimates these
companies cost the government 39 billion dollars a year and
since this is the amount raised by the personal income tax,
the personal tax then could be abolished.32
As an additional reason for abolishing the income tax,
McIntire maintains that "almost all of the Fabian, Keynesian,
Neo-Marxist, and Communist growth in our country can di-
rectly or indirectly be traced to the financial support"
from the personal income tax.33
One reason for Communist growth to which the personal
income tax is not traceable is the increased sale of Commu-
nist "slave labor" produced merchandise in American stores.
McIntire believes the American money used to purchase this
merchandise is enabling the Reds to finance their "conspiracy
to rule the world." Partners with the Communists in this
conspiracy are the businessman, more concerned with making
32Christian Beacon, November 8, 1962, pp. 1-8.
33Christian Beacon, November 8, 1962, p. 8. McIntireprovides no explanation for this statement.
111
money than with principles, and the State Department, whose
policy approves of trade with Communist countries, The
danger, as McIntire sees it, is that "if Americans continue
to prefer the labor of the Communist slaves, they will them-
selves become slaves." 4
The successful operation of this conspiracy was first
brought to his attention, McIntire writes, by Robert Hatch,
pastor of the Bible Presbyterian Church of Kansas City,
Missouri. McIntire promptly exposed it on the 20th Century
Reformation Hour and in the Christian Beacon. A chart,
compiled by the Florida Committee to Warn of the Arrival of
Communist Merchandise on the Local Scene, was printed and
distributed in the Beacon to help its readers identify
products commonly imported from Poland, Yugoslavia, Czecho-
slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Cuba, and East Germany.
McIntire suggests that the patriot not buy any "slave labor"
produced merchandise, for to do so would be to aid and abet
the cause of the "international conspiracy." A Phoenix,
Arizona seventh-grade teacher, in a letter to the Christian
Beacon, reported that as a gift to his students he started
to buy "nice big lollipops" but discovered they were "'Made
in Czechoslovakia' lollipops," so he purchased "bubble gum,
American style." Another reader reported that in the use of
Communist-made merchandise, "there is a possibility of
34 Christian Beacon, August 2, 1962, p. 1.
112
poisoning our people," with sedatives such as the fluorides
and bromides, 3 5
A second method employed by the patriot to stop the
sale of Communist merchandise is the distribution of cards
which announce, for example, "Always buy your COMMUNIST
FOODS at FOODFAIR," and on the other side, "Hams from Poland
. . inspected for your table by COMMUNISTS."36
Shifting from Poland to Cuba, McIntire warns that the
same leaders and strategy which successfully led Cuba into
Communism are conditioning the American people to accept
peaceful co-existence with godless Communism. This can only
lead to "surrender and slavery." In the hope that Americans
will profit from past experience, he wrote "Why the United
States was Deceived on Castro." 37 The American press,
typified in journalism by Herbert Matthews of the New York
Times, and in television by Robert Taber, a C.B.S. Cuba
correspondent, has played a major role in misleading the
American people as to the true nature of Fidel Castro.
Even more misleading, to McIntire's regret, was the use
of the church in perpetrating this deception. He offers as
evidence for his assertion public statements of Oscar
35Christian Beacon, August 2, 1962, pp. 1, 2, 4,36Christian Beacon, August 2, 1962, p. 2. Such "card
parties" have become a favorite of the ultra-conservativesacross the country. "TCTWOTAOCMOTIBS," Newsweek, LXI(December 3, 1962), 3-4.
37 Christian Beacon, December 6, 1962, pp. 2, 8.
113
Rodriquez and Duke McCall. Rodriquez, president of the
Cuban Theological Seminary, said in an address to the Ameri-
can Baptist Convention in June, 1960 that the Protestant
leaders in Cuba were behind Castro and the socialistic re-
forms of the revolutionary leader must be given a chance.
McCall, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Semi-
nary, Louisville, Kentucky, stated his sympathy with Cuba's
"expropriation" of the United Fruit Company's 1,482,600 acre
farm in a report of his Cuban visit to the Baptist World
Alliance meeting in Rio de Janeiro in the summer of 1960.
When American church leaders are sympathetic to this kind of
expropriation, McIntire notes, it only "indicates how far
church leaders" are committed to a Communist revolution.38
Other ecumenical "dreamers" who were "duped and de-
ceived" about Castro include John A. Mackay, former presi-
dent of Princeton Theological Seminary, and Arthur L. Miller,
moderator of the General Assembly of the United Presbyterian
Church. These men followed what McIntire considers the
usual pattern: a trip to Cuba, an address upon return before
a large denominational gathering with its resultant pub-
licity, and a spate of pro-Castro articles. Most of these
men are leaders in the NCC, men who agree "basically with
the socialistic philosophy of the Communist world." 39
38 Christian Beacon, December 6, 1962, p. 2.
39 Christian Beacon, December 6, 1962, p. 8.
114
Another organization which McIntire feels is in sympa-
thy with Communist philosophy is the United Nations. He is
greatly alarmed that the United Nations is replacing its
"spirit of patriotism and allegiance" to the United States
with allegiance to a "diabolical internationalism and one-
world government." This transfer of allegiance is being
accomplished through Secretary General U Thant and the
United Nation's many agencies. In particular, the ACCC is
convinced the United Nations International Children's
Emergency Fund is Communist-controlled.40
McIntire's evidence of UNICEF's Communist control is
its aid to Communist countries. From 1947 to 1950 UNICEF
aided fourteen countries, of which seven were Eastern
European Communist countries. Then too, the Fund has Commu-
nists on its executive board and staff.4 1
Potentially the "most powerful man in the world" is
U Thant. Potential will become reality when the United
Nations becomes a world government. Because of U Thant's
importance, the ACCC scrutinized his philosophy and activi-
ties. Inspection revealed the United Nations leader to be
"doing more to help the Communist cause than anyone else."
McIntire based this statement on U Thant's acceptance of
democratic Socialism, his desire that the United Nations
4OChristian Beacon, October 4, 1962, pp. 3, 6.
4lChristian Beacon, October 4, 1962, pp. 3, 6;May 2, 1963, p. 4.
115
become a sovereign state, his hope for peaceful co-existence
between the Communist East and the democratic West, his en-
dorsement of recognition of Red China, and his approval of
Pope John XIII's Peace on Earth encyclical. McIntire feels
these are reason enough for the United States to withdraw
from the United Nations, and "all Americans should work
immediately" to bring this about. As long as Communism is
being furthered through United Nations agencies and by
U Thant, all efforts to give the "corrupt flag" of the
United Nations equality or "even a position above" Old Glory
should be opposed and rejected.42
McIntire finds it "most significant" that the anti-
Communist organizations are attacked and "smeared" while
America allows herself to be controlled by the United
Nations. It is significant because those who attack are
aiding Communism and those who are attacked are successfully
fighting Communism in direct proportion to the severity of
the attack.
When Senator Kuchel, Republican from California, at-
tacked McIntire from the Senate floor on May 2, 1963, ac-
cusing him of being a "fright peddler," a "crackpot for
paranoia and profit," and a "hillbilly huckster of hate,"
McIntire was moved to make an extensive defense of his activi-
ties.43 In a public letter to the Senator the Presbyterian
42Christian Beacon, April 18, 1963, pp. 1, 8;May 2, 3,PP.5, 8;7may 16, 1963, p. 5.
43Christian Beacon, May 23, 1963, pp. 1-9; June 13, 1963,p. 1.
116
churchman said he was proud to be a leader of the fundamen-
talist right wing, and considers himself a "watchman on the
wall warning the nation against the destruction and disaster"
awaiting the American people if her government continues a
"no-win policy, a muzzling of the military, and helping to
finance the kingdom of the Reds." 4
McIntire asked Kuchel why the American people should
not be fearful, in light of Communist progress here. More-
over, McIntire added, "the U.N. scares many," because the
United States is disarming and allowing a world army to be
built under the control of the United Nations military secre-
tariat, which is controlled by the "international Communist
conspiracy.,,45 Kuchel's accusation, as McIntire sees it,
arises from his lack of knowledge concerning America's dis-
armament and suggests his ignorance of the Second Annual
Report to Congress of the United States Arms Control and
Disarmament Agency.46
McIntire specifically chides Kuchel for dismissing the
John Birch Society's exposure of former President Eisenhower
as a Communist. He says the charge made by Robert Welch in
The Politician, John Birch Society publication "documented
to the limit," that "he--Eisenhower--is a mere stooge, or
44Christian Beacon, May 23, 1963, p. 3: The letter, aspublished in the Beacon, was entitled "A Preacher Replies toa United States Senator: Kuchel versus McIntire."
45Christian Beacon, May 23, 1963, pp. 3, 6.
46Christian Beacon, May 23, 1963, p. 6.
117
that he is a Communist assigned the specific job of being a
political front man" has substance.4 7 McIntire himself,
however, does "not believe that Eisenhower is a Communist;
that is, a member of the Communist Partyl" but does believe
Eisenhower aided the cause of Communism when he invited
Khrushchev to visit America in 1959. Furthermore, when
"Khrushchev spit in his face, repudiated his agreement to
have him [Eisenhower] come to Moscow," he "deserved" it.48
In his attack on McIntire, Kuchel says the churchman
is an anti-Communist for profit. McIntire emphatically
states he is not a patriot for profit. Indeed, he says it
would be impossible to make a profit, for the Internal Rev-
enue Bureau is continually investigating, harassing, and
intimidating all rightist organizations. The only money he
receives from this work is his salary from his Collingswood
church, plus traveling expenses.4 9 Financial support for
the ACCC comes largely from "free will" offerings. Money is
raised at protest rallies for new radio stations, which
usually sustain themselves by gifts from listeners in the
47Christian Beacon, May 23, 1963, p. 5: McIntire doesnot tell his readers this quote is a revised version ofWelch's original statement, which was, "My firm belief thatDwight Eisenhower is a dedicated, conscious agent of theCommunist conspiracy is based on an accumulation of detailedevidence so extensive and so palpable that it seems to me toput this conviction beyond any reasonable doubt." Cited inChester Morrison, "The Man Behind the John Birch Society,"Look, XXV (September 26, 1961), 27.
48Christian Beacon, May 23, 1963, p. 5.
49Christian Beacon, Mkay 23, 1963, p. 8.
118
area. Campaigns for money are conducted only when a specific
project is in sight, such as the purchase of the Christian
Admiral Hotel. The Christian Beacon's subscription price
covers its production costs; books and pamphlets are either
sold at a low cost or given away. Neither the Christian
Beacon nor the 20th Century Reformation Hour sell tapes or
films.
Primarily a churchman, McIntire comments on daily
events as he believes they relate to his separatist ministry.
With his rather exclusive definition of free enterprise and
and concept of individualism, he views most events as caused
by Socialists or Communists. He considers the middle of the
road anti-Communism advocated by his detractors to be actu-
ally anti-anti-Communism. He seeks to undermine the NCC,
creating in its stead a pure Presbyterian Church, and desires
a government which allows complete freedom for each person.
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
The re-emergence of the far right after World War II is
a phenomenon within American conservatism which has been
greatly strengthened by the activities of Hargis, Bundy, and
McIntire. Though there are more than two thousand ultra-
conservative organizations, these three men and tneir organi-
zations are among the largest and most active. They are
leaders of the Religious Right.
The three were raised and educated through high school
in the South. Only Hargis chose to stay there, and located
his Christian Crusade headquarters in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Bundy and McIntire established themselves in the region
where they received their advanced education: Bundy in
Wheaton, Illinois; McIntire in Collingswood, New Jersey.
All three, however, gear their programs for national recog-
nition and reception. By securing radio stations, Hargis
and McIntire attempt more than regional appeal and seek to
blanket the nation with stations in each state and community.
McIntire alone has listeners outside the United States,
through the short-wave station WINB. They all hold confer-
ences and fill speaking engagements in every section of the
country.
119
120
Hargis is an ordained Disciples of Christ minister,
Bundy is an ordained Southern Baptist minister, and McIntire
is an ordained Presbyterian minister with a congregation of
over one thousand members, Though they claim to be pure
representatives of American religious fundamentalism, they
are repudiated by fundamentalist leaders and, in fact, be-
lieve other fundamentalists, notably Billy Graham, are
aiding and abetting Communism.
These men and their organizations have five character-
istics in common. Each assumes there are solutions which,
if applied to the problems of the day, would produce imme-
diate peace. When these solutions cannot be found or are
not used, the failure is attributed to. the international
Communist conspiracy led by Satan, the arch foe of all time.
Therefore, to these men the real issue is truth versus
error, God versus Satan. Hargis sees this conspiracy in all
phases of American society, even kindergarten. Bundy is
particularly concerned about the schools and churches,
warning that if these major institutions are subverted Amer-
ica's fall will be swift. To McIntire, the principal dangers
are the Communist conspiracy operating through the National
Council of Churches and the federal government's program to
harass fundamentalist churches by means of the income tax.
All three leaders are convinced the conspiracy's network
does not depend for its strength solely on the dedicated
Communists. They believe that for every one Communist there
121
are at least ten dupes doing the Communist's work, The
dupes introduce liberal ideas and thus set the stage for
Socialism, to be followed inevitably by Communism.
In describing this fatal process, leaders of the Reli-
gious Right seem to contradict themselves. On the one hand,
the federal government is so weak due to Communist infiltra-
tion that socialization as a Russian Republic is imminent.
On the other hand, the government is so powerful that if it
would only abandon its "no-win" policy and stand up to
Russia, Communist subversion would immediately collapse.
In the federal government only the military and the con-
gressional investigating agencies are not suspect, but even
these are endangered. The military is being muzzled and
smeared, and the congressional agencies are threatened with
extinction.
Hargis, Bundy, and McIntire all see America's major
institutions as infiltrated to such an extent that they have
become or are about to become part of the conspiracy, unless
Americans heed the warnings of the CC, the CLA, and the ACCC.
The churches, as symbolized by the National Council of
Churches, are a major tool of the Communist. G. Bromley
Oxnam, whom McIntire describes as "the Prophet of Marx," is
pictured as representative of the seven or eight thousand
Protestant clergyman who are aiding and abetting the inter-
national conspiracy. The three continually challenge the
integrity and patriotism of community leaders, for Bundy
122
warns of the librarian stocking her shelves with Communist
works, Hargis alerts us to the menace of the public school
teacher inculcating Socialism, and McIntire exposes the
unprincipled businessman leading America into slavery by
selling Communist goods.
Each of the three views the government as a growing
monster seeking to enslave and devour its people. They
consider the Supreme Court subversive and the executive
branch a dictatorship. America's hope lies in a return to
the principles set down by her founding fathers in the
Constitution and legislative branch.
Hargis, Bundy, and McIntire reject the basic programs
which conservatives and liberals alike have agreed on as
necessary in dealing with social, economic, and international
problems. Instead they propose to turn the clock back, as
evidenced by McIntire's support of the Liberty Amendment and
income tax repeal, Bundy's opposition to integration, and
Hargis' desire to cease all foreign aid and teach only free
enterprise and individualism in the schools.
Each believes the only way to save America from the
international Communist conspiracy is to mobilize every
patriotic American into direct action at the grass-roots
level. In local communities pressure groups are formed to
place rightist literature in the libraries and ban material
which they regard as objectionable. Direct action is advo-
cated for parents. Hargis suggests they investigate their
public school teachers, textbooks, and curriculum. Bundy
123
advocates asking each university president if Communists are
on his faculty, and if fifty per cent of the faculty are
conservatives favoring the free enterprise system. All
three urge the individual to compile voting records of
congressmen, contact friends to vote on particular anti-
Communist issues, and put pressure on members of Congress
by sending letters, telegrams, and petitions calling for an
end to foreign aid to Yugoslavia, Poland, and neutral coun-
tries and for a law against the importation of slave-made
products from these countries. Other common goals are
restriction of the Supreme Court's power, repeal of the
income tax and Social Security, withdrawal of the United
States from the United Nations and the United Nations from
the United States, and refusal to recognize Red China.
By portraying the Pilgrims and Puritans as the Founding
Fathers, and claiming they established a Christian nation
with a Christian Constitution, these far-right leaders have
distorted America's heritage. They construe the Constitution
to support free enterprise, capitalism, individualism, iso-
lationism, national sovereignty, uninhibited segregation,
and the use of private property in any manner one pleases.
To depart from this interpretation is to depart from the
Constitution, and it is more, it is to depart from God.
These organizations are influencing millions of Ameri-
cans to view man's failures in dealing with domestic and
international problems, not as a result of human weakness,
124
but as a part of the Communist conspiracy. Hargis, Bundy,
and McIntire have been working for years to document what
they consider to be the infiltration and subversion of the
government, schools, churches, press, and social organiza-
tions. In so doing they have been feeding on the unrest of
a complex society caught up in a cold war.
Through radio, television, motion pictures, filmstrips,
books, pamphlets, newspapers, special reports, conferences,
and just recently their own schools, colleges, and univer-
sities, the three are able to sway public opinion. The
Christian Crusade Anti-Communist Youth University and the
Christian Admiral, both opened in 1963, will increase their
impact,
The Religious Right has yet to reach its high water
mark; the tide is still rising.
APPENDIX
A. Christian Crusade National Advisory Committee.
B. Christian Crusade Film List.
C. Church League of America Film List.
D. American Council of Christian Churches MembershipStatistics.
E. Christian Beacon Cartoons.
125
CHRISTIAN CRUSADE NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Founder-PresidentBilly James Hargis, D.D., Founder-President
TrusteesJ. E. HargisCharles PileC. R. BlissEdwin Hill
Board of Advisors and EndorsersThomas J. Anderson, Publisher, "Farm and Ranch Magazine,"
Nashville, TennesseeWilliam C. Birely, Investment Securities, State Chairman,
Young Republicans, Washington, D.C.Lieutenant General Lewis H. Brereton, U, S. Air Force,
Retired, Winter Park, FloridaDonald E. Bruce, Manufacturer's Representative,
St. Paul, MinnesotaColonel Laurence E. Bunker, Former aide-de-camp to
General Douglas MacArthur, Wellesley, MassachusettsMiss Taylor Caldwell, Noted Author of "The Devil's
Advocate," and many other books, Buffalo, New YorkF. Gano Chance, Distinguished Libertarian Industrialist,
Centralia, MissouriHonorable James H. R. Cromwell, Industrialist, Former
Ambassador to Canada, New York, New YorkMrs. Mary D. Cain, Publisher, "Summit Sun"; (Missis-
sippi) Chairman, "Congress of Freedom," Summit, MississippiBrigadier General William P. Campbell, Vice President,
"National Education Program," Searcy, ArkansasMatt Cvetic, Former Undercover Agent for the FBI,
Author, "Big Decision," Los Angeles, CaliforniaHonorable James C. Davis, Congressman from GeorgiaMrs. Mary Barclay Erb, Editor, "Report to America;"
Former National Defense Chairman, D.A.R., New York, New YorkBrigadier General Bonner Fellers, National Director of
"For America," U. S. Army, retired, Washington, D.C.Honorable E. L. Forrester, Congressman from GeorgiaHonorable Hamilton Fish, Former Congressman from New
York, First Chairman of the Congressional Committee on Un-American Activities, New York, New York
J. H. Gipson, Sr., Distinguished Publisher of Liber-tarian Books, Caldwell, Idaho
Dr. Alfred P. Haake, Noted Libertarian Economist,Chairman, "Laymants National Committee," Largo, Florida
Dr. Bob Jones, Jr., President, Bob Jones University,Greenville, South Carolina
126
127
Otis Beall Kent, Celebrated Rightist Attorney,Rockville, Maryland
Walter Knott, Knott's Berry Farm, Buena Park, CaliforniaFred C. Koch, President, Rock Island Oil Company,
Wichita, KansasHonorable J. Bracken Lee, Mayor, Salt Lake City, UtahBrigadier General William L. Lee, U. S. Air Force,
Retired, Amarillo, TexasD. B. Lewis, President, Dr. Ross Pet Food Company,
TV. Sponsor of Dan Smoot, Los Angeles, CaliforniaMilton M. Lory, President, American Coalition of Patri-
otic Societies, Past President General, S.AR., Sioux City,Iowa
Lieutenant General Sumter L. Lowry, U.S.N.G., Retired,Tampa, Florida
Clarence E. Manion, Former Dean, Notre Dame Law School,Moderator, "The Manion Forum," South Bend, Indiana
Miss Betty McConkey, Director, Anti-Communist Crusades,Des Moines, Iowa
Thurman H. McCoy, Patriotic Retail Merchant, Atlanta,Georgia
Robert E. Nesmith, Patriotic Industrialist, Houston,Texas
Dr. Revilo P. Oliver, Professor, University of Illinois,Urbana, Illinois
Mrs. Jessica Wyatt Payne, West Virginia AmericanismChairman, American Legion Auxiliary, Huntington, West Virginia
Honorable M. T. Phelps, Former Chief Justice of Arizona,Phoenix, Arizona
Hugh S. Ramsey, M.D., Conservative Crusader, Bloomington,Indiana
Honorable John H. Rousselot, Congressman from CaliforniaR. B. Snowden, Distinguished Arkansas Planter, Memphis,
TennesseeHonorable Wint Smith, Former Congressman from Kansas,
Manhattan, KansasLieutenant General George E. Stratemeyer, U. S. Army,
Retired, Winter Park, FloridaDr. Charles C. Tansill, Noted Historian, Author "Back
Door to War," etc., Washington, D.C.Dr. Joseph F. Thorning, Associate Editor of "World
Affairs," Frederick, MarylandJohn B. Trevor, Jr., Outstanding Patriot, New York, New
YorkHarold Lord Varney, President, Committee on Pan-American
Policy, New York, New YorkColonel William E. Warner, Chairman, Ohio Coalition of
Patriotic Societies, Columbus, OhioWheeler Williams, Famous Sculptor (of the Robert Taft
Memorial, etc.), New York, New York
128
Major General C. A. Willoughby, Chief of Intelligencefor General MacArthur during World War II and the KoreanWar, Washington, D.C.1
1Billy James Hargis, Facts about Christian Crusade(Tulsa, [n.d.]), pp. 11-13.
CHRISTIAN CRUSADE FILM LIST
Anti-Communist Speeches
Speaker and Subject
Dr. Billy James Hargis"This I Believe"
Dr. Billy James Hargis"The Red Peril of the 60's"
Congressman John Rousselot"How to Influence Legislation"
General William Campbell"Individual Political Responsi-bility"
Congressman Gordon Scherer"You Are the Target"
Mr. Edward Hunter"Brainwashing"
Miss Barbara Hartle"My Rebirth in Freedom"
Captain Eddie Rickenbacker"My Life Story As An American"
Mrs. H. A. Alexander"Red Stains on the Pages ofAmerican Textbooks"
Mr. Myers Lowman"Red Front Associations ofClergymen"
Dr. R. P. Oliver"Toward A Positive Program ofVictory over Communism"
Mr. C. Carter Pittman"The Fifth Amendment"
Mr. Benjamin Gitlow"I Defied Stalin"
Time of Film Price
25 minutes $ 75.00
1 hr. 19 min. 200.00
35 minutes
50 minutes
100.00
175.00
1 hr. 15 min. 200.00
1 hr. 22 min. 200.00
37 minutes
56 minutes
100.00
175.00
1 hr. 7 min. 200.00
1 hr. 22 min. 200.00
1 hr. 2 min.
53 minutes
1 hr. 27 min.
200.00
175.00
200.00
Interviews between Dr. Hargis and Guests
Guest
Miss Barbara HartleMr. Benjamin GitlowGovernor J. Bracken LeeMr. Carter PittmanDr. R. P. OliverMr. Myers Lowman
151515151515
minutesminutesminutesminutesminutesminutes
65.0065.0065.0065.0065.0065.00
129
General William P. CampbellCongressman John RousselotMr. Edward Hunter
15 minutes15 minutes15 minutes
130
2 Christian Crusade (October, 1962), p. 2.
65.0065.0065.002
CHURCH LEAGUE OF AMERICA FILM LIST
Title and Description Time
"It's A Grand Old Flag"History of the flag
"Lincoln Speaks for Himself"Life of Abraham Lincoln
"Communist Imperalism sic "Countries subjugated~by SovietUnion since 1917
"Communism on the Map"Communism's advance, nation bynation
"Communist Encirclement 196111Growth of Red conspiracy
"Communist Accent on Youth"Explores how philosophies ofCommunism contrast with freedom
"Operation Abolition"Covers Communist-led riotsagainst HUAC in San Francisco
"Our American Heritage"Great events of early Americanhistory
"Red China Outlaw"Communist atrocities againsthelpless Chinese
"Revolt in Hungary"Hungarians disproved Communisttheories
"The Two Berlins"Comparison between freedom andenslavement in Berlin today
"The Ultimate Weapon"Chinese Communist brainwashingtechniques
20 minutes
40 minutes
30 minutes
1 hr. 45 min.
40 minutes
45 minutes
45 minutes
15 minutes
30 minutes
26 minutes
20 minutes
27 minutes
131
Rental
$ 5.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
15.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
3 Price List for Publications of the Church LgAmerica-(Wheaton,~Tlinois, [n.d.,~ PP. 36-37.
of
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF CHRISTIAN CHURCHES
MEMBERSHIP STATISTICS
The American Council of Christian Churches, meeting inBoston, Mass., released an official statement on membershipstatistics as of October 28, 1954. The full statementfollows:
CONSTITUENT MEMBERS
Associated Gospel ChurchesBible Presbyterian ChurchBible Protestant ChurchConference of Fundamental ChurchesEvangelical Methodist ChurchGeneral Association of Regular Baptist ChurchesMethodist Protestant ChurchSouthern Methodist ChurchTioga River Christian ConferenceFundamental Conference of AmericaUnited Christian ChurchMilitant Fundamental Bible ChurchesConservative Baptist Association, CanadaNational Fellowship of Brethren Churches (Radio)World Baptist FellowshipCongregational Methodist ChurchIndependent Churches, Affiliated
Total Constituent Membership (17 bodies)
Local Constituent Membership
Individual Constituent Membership
TOTAL CONSTITUENT MEMBERSHIP
INDIVIDUAL AUXILIARY MEMBERSHIP(This figure represents individuals who are stillin the National Council of Churches but who, overtheir own signature, repudiated the NationalCouncil's representation and asked the American
3,00015,6622,310
No report10,84493,9835,1717,0003,793
No report5,1501,8146,000
40,00049,9105,77412,900
263,311
305,505
175,000
743,816
440,161
132
133
Council to represent and count them in mattersof radio, etc. They are not voting members.)
TOTAL ALL CLASSIFICATIONS 1,183,9774
Carl McIntire, Servants of Apostasy (Collingswood,N.J., 1955), p. 380. The ACCC~~eclines to provide statisticsto the Yearbook of American Churches. Benson Y. Landis,editor, Yearbook of American Churches: Information on AllFaiths in the.S~., Edition for 1962 (New York,,9277p. 8. Ralph Lord Roy considers McIntire's membership claimsto be "highly exaggerated." Ralph Lord Roy, Apostles ofDiscord (Boston, 1953), pp. 196-198, 393-398.
CHRISTIAN BEACON CARTOONS
murmuogf
5
5Christian Beacon, July 4, 1963, p. 8.
134
*ZWAVA'
.. MAPvmwo
boo
135
TIEE-STAG[ SInE
2.0PMINISIEP
's A_
PEVOilR F
k,
6
6 Christian Beacon, May 2, 1963, p. 5.
mill
PGWPEP
SR.
I
136
AW-oN 9tI
Yaw"
77 -Ai
7
7 Christian Beacon, March 28, 1963, p. 1.
137
Lm SNOT SEECONAFL/CTAS 1A
INEVITABLE..SUTLET'S MA kE TMEF
WORLPAFFFM/ )U MEAN/AFE FOE.
LIES C) 1 i S
8
8 Christian Beacon, June 27, 1963, p. 8,
138
9
9Christian Beacon, May 23, 1963, p. 8.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
Agar, Herbert, The Price of Power: America since 1945, TheChicago History of American Civilization, edited byDaniel J. Boorstin, Chicago, The University of ChicagoPress, 1957.
Bell, Daniel, editor, The New American Right, New York,Criterion Books, 1955.
Bundy, Edgar C., Collectivism in the Churches, Wheaton,Illinois, The Church League of~America, 1961.
Burlingame, Roger, The Sixth Column, Philadelphia, J. B.Lippincott Co., 1962,
Carnell, Edward J., The Case for Orthodox Theology, Phila-delphia, The Westminster Press, 1959.
Carr, Robert K., The House Committee on Un-American Activi-ties, 1945-1950, Cornell Studies~Tn~sivil Liberty,edited by Robert E. Cushman, Ithaca, New York, CornellUniversity Press, 1952.
Cole, Stewart G., History of Fundamentalism, New York,Richard R. Smith, Inc., 1931.
Donner, Frank J., The Un-Americans, New York, BallantineBooks, 1961.
Draper, Theodore, American Communism and Soviet Russia,Communism in American Life, edited by Clinton Rossiter,New York, The Viking Press, 1960.
, Castro's Revolution: Myths and Realities,New York, Frederick A. Praeger, Publisher,~1962.
, The Roots of American Communism, Communismin American Life, edited by Clinton Rossiter, New York,The Viking Press, 1957.
Dudman, Richard, Men of the Far Right, New York, PyramidBooks, 1962.
139
140
Ebenstein, William, Today's ISMS: Communism, Fascism, Capi-talism, Socialism, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall,Inc., 19b1.
Feinberg, Charles L., editor, The Fundamentals for Today(2 volumes), Grand Rapids, Kregel Publications, 1958.
Flynn, John T., The Road Ahead: America's Creepin Revolu-tion, New York, The Devin-Adair Company, 1961.
Furniss, Norman E., The Fundamentalist Controvers 1918-1931, New Haven,7Yale University Press,195.
Goldman, Eric F., The Crucial Decade--and After: America,1945-1960, NewYork, Vintage Books, 1961.
Goldwater, Barry, The Conscience of a Conservative, New York,Millman Books,~196.
Gordon, Ernest, The Leaven of the Sadducees, Chicago, TheBible Institute Colportage Ass'n, 1926.
Halverson, Marvin, editor, A Handbook of Christian Theology,New York, Meridian Books, Inc., 1958.
Hargis, Billy James, Communist America: Must It Be?, Tulsa,Christian Crusade, 1960.
, The Facts about Communism and OurChurches, Tulsa,ChristianCrusade, 1962.
Henry, Carl F. H., The U Conscience of Modern Funda-mentalism, Grand~Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans PublishingCompany, 1947.
Higham, John, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of AmericanNativism Th60-1925, New York, Atheneum, 1963.
Hook, Sidney, Political Power and Personal Freedom, New York,Criterion Books, 1959.
Hoover, J. Edgar, Masters of Deceit, New York, Pocket Books,Inc., 1961.
Hordern, William, A Layman's Guide to Protestant ThsFNew York, The~Macmillan Gompany, 9
Hudson, Winthrop S., American Protestantism, The ChicagoHistory of American Civilization, edited by Daniel J.Boorstin, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1961.
141
Iversen, Tobert W., The Communists and the Schools, Communismin American Life, edited by ClinToFossiter, New York,Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1959.
Janson, Donald and Bernard Eismann, The Far Right, New York,McGraw Hill Company, Inc., 19637
Kaub, Verne P., Communist-Socialist Propaganda in AmericanSchools, Boston, Meador Publishing Company,~19 3
Landis, Benson Y., editor, Yearbook of American Churches:Information on All Faiths inth~U. Edition for1961,New York, National Council of te Churches ofChrist in the U.S.A., 1960.
, editor, Yearbook of American Churches:Information on All Faiths in the~U.S.A., Edition for1962, New York, National Council of te Churches ofChrist in the U.S.A., 1961.
Latourette, Kenneth Scott, A History of Christianity, NewYork, Harper & Brothers, 1953.
Leuchtenburg, William E., The Perils of Prosperity, 1914-32,The Chicago History of~American Civilization, edited byDaniel J. Boorstin, Chicago, The University of ChicagoPress, 1958.
A Manual for Survival, Wheaton, Illinois, The Church Leagueof America, 1961.
McIntire, Carl, Author of Libert , Collingswood, New Jersey,Christian Beacon Press, 94.
_, Modern Tower of Babel, Collingswood, NewJersey, Christian Beacon~Press, 1949.
, The Rise of the Tyrant: Controlled Economyvs. Private Enterprise, Collingswood, New Jersey,Christian Beacon Press, 1945.
, Servants of Aostasy, Collingswood, NewJersey, Christian Beacon Press, 1955.
, Twentieth Century Reformation, Collingswood,New Jersey, Christian Beacon Press, 1944.
Myers, Gustavus, History of Bigotr y in the United States,New York, Capricorn Books,190.
142
Packer, J. I., "Fundamentalism" and the Word of God, GrandRapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1957
Root, E. Merrill, Brainwashing in the High Schools, New York,The Devin-Adair Company, 1958
, Collectivism on the Campus: The Battle forthe Mind in American Coles, New York, The Devin-Adair Company, 1955.
Rossiter, Clinton, Conservatism in America: The ThanklessPersuasion, New York, Vintage Books, 19=72
Roy, Ralph Lord, Apostles of Discord, Boston, The BeaconPress, 1953.
, Communism and the Churches, Communism inAmerican Life, edited by Clinton Rossiter, New York,Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1960.
Rudd, Augustin G., Bending the Twig, New York, Sons of theAmerican Revolution, 195E.
Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr., The Politics of Hope, Boston,Houghton Mifflin Company,T19E2,
Shannon, David A., The Decline of American Communism, Commu-nism in American Life, edited by Clinton Rossiter, NewYork, Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1959,
Articles
Adams, J. K., "Saving America, Inc.," Nation, CXCIII(September 30, 1961), 191-195.
"Bishop Oxnam's Challenge," Christian Century, LXX (August 5,1953), 1262-1264.
Cassels, Louis, "The Rightist Crisis in Our Churches," Look,XXVI (April 24, 1962), 40-52.
Chmaj, Betty E., "Paranoid Patriotism," The Atlantic, CCX(November, 1962), 91-97.
"Christian Crusade," Time, LXXX (August 17, 1962), 53.
"The Communists Are Using Our Churches," American Mercury,LXXXV (October, 1957), 87-89.
Cook, Fred J., "The Ultras," Nation, CXCIV (June 30, 1962),565-596,
143
"The Far Right: Crusade and Collect," Newsweek, LXI (April 1,1963), 21-22.
Findlay, James, "Moody, 'Gapmen,' and the Gospel: The EarlyDays of Moody Bible Institute," Church History, XXXI(September, 1962), 322-335.
Hargis, Billy James, "Are We Opposed to Communism?," AmericanMercury, LXXXIV (February, 1957), 28.
,9 "A Christian Ambassador Surveys theDivided World," American Mercury, LXXXV (October, 1957),141-145.
"The History of American CommunistFronts," American Mercury, LXXXVII (December, 1958), 26-33.
, "Patriotism--Once Revered, Now Smeared,"American Mercury, XCI (October, 1960), 137-147.
, "Three Christian Giants in a World ofDwarfs," American Mercury, LXXXV (December, 1957), 14-20.
"Heavyweight Champ," Time, LXXX (August 17, 1962), 53.
"Holy Days in Holy Land," Life Special Issue: Christianity,XXXIX and XL (December 27, 1955), 166-167.
Hyde, Homer H., "Are We Educating Our Children to be Social-ists?," American Mercury, XCVI (April, 1963), 25-32.
Martin, Harold H., "The Communist Party U.S.A.," SaturdayEvening Post, CCXXXV (May 19, 1962 , 17-23.
,. "Doomsday Merchant on the Far, Far Right,"Saturday Evening Post, CCXXXV (April 28, 1962), 19-25.
Nelson, Jack, "What Is the Problem?," NEA Journal, LII (May,1963), 19-22.
Rushmore, Howard, "Mr. Anti-Communist," American MercuryLXXVI (May, 1953), 79-96.
"The Scandal of Bogus Degrees," Christianity Today, IV (May 9,1960), 664-666.
Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr., "The Failure of World Communism,"Saturday Evening Post, CCXXXV (May 19, 1962), 13-14.
Schneider, Eugene V., "The Radical Right," Nation, CXCIII(September 30, 1961), 199-203.
144
Soth, L., "Christian Crusade," Christian Century, LXXIX(October 10, 1962), 1223-1225.
Stuermann, Walter E., "'Crusaders' Go to School in Tulsa,"Presbyterian Life, XIX (March 15, 1962), 34-38.
"TCTWOTAOCMOTLBS," Newsweek, LXI (December 3, 1962), 3-4.
"Thunder Against the Right," Time, LXXVIII (November 24,1961), 11-12.
"Thunder On the Far Right," Newsweek, LVIII (December 4,1961), 18-22.
"Ultras," Time, LXXVIII (December 8, 1961), 22-25.
Uzzell, Thomas H., "Billy James Hargis: A Pitch for God andCountry," Nation, CXCIV (February 17, 1962), 140-142.
Walhout, Edwin, "The Liberal-Fundamentalist Debate,"Christianity Today, VII (March 1, 1963), 519-520.
Walvoord, John F., "What's Right about Fundamentalism,"Eternity, VIII (June, 1957), 6-35.
Wheeler, Keith, "Who's Who in the Tumult of the Far Right,"Life, LII (February 9, 1962), 110-127.
White, Pete, "Bibles from the Sky!," American Mercury,LXXXV (April, 1957), 88-91.
Reports
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Btrith, Facts, Rev. BillyJames Hargis: The Christian Crusade, Vol. T4~ No.T6,New York, 1962.
The National Council of the Protestant Episcopal Church,Sowing Dissension in the Churches, A Report of theDepartment of Christian Social Relations, New York,Protestant Episcopal Church, [n.d.].
Special Reports(Reproduced and distributed by Church League of America)
"Affiliations Record of Rev. Virgil E. Lowder," Wheaton,Illinois, mn.d.].
"American Malvern," Time, March 16, 1942.
145
Evans, M. Stanton, "Just Who's Distorting What?," NationalReview, May 6, 1961.
Hoover, J. Edgar, "God or Chaos?," Redbook Magazine,February, 1949.
Hoover-Murphy Letter, U. S. Department of Justice, March 26,1956.
Kaub, Verne P., "Does the National Council of ChurchesRepresent American Protestantism?," United EvangelicalAction, February 1, 1957.
"Laymen and Clergy at Odds on Role of Church in Politics,"U. S. News & World p February 3, 1956.
Matthews, J. B,, "Communism in the Churches," Address atCollingswood Bible Presbyterian Church, March 22, 1958.
McIntire, Carl, "Billy Graham," Christian Beacon, October 27,1960.
Pew, J. Howard, "Preface to Final Report to the NationalLay Committee," December 15, 1955.
., "Remarks to National Council of UnitedPresbyterian Men," March 19, 1960.
Philbrick, Herbert A., "The Communists Are After YOURChurch!," Christian~Herald, /~n.d.J.
"Political and Economic Resolutions and Pronouncements Passedby the National Council of Churches Since 1951," Wheaton,Illinois, [n.d.].
"The Roy Boy," Wheaton, Illinois, May, 1961.
"Shocking Eye Witness Accounts of the San Francisco City HallRiots," The Blu-Print, Oakland, California, May 12, 1960.
Sokolsky, George E., "Matthews is Best Authority on Reds,"New York Journal American, July 9, 1953.
Pamphlets
American Council of Christian Churches, New York, The Ameri-can Council of Christian Churches, fn.dj.
Bibliography on Communism and Socialism in the Churches,Wheaton,~Illinois, Church League of America, [.d.J.
146
Bring the Truth to Your Friends with Christian Crusade Maga-zine, Tulsa,7Christian Crusade, [n.d.7J.
Christian Crusade International Radio Network, Tulsa,Christian Crusade, April, 9672.
The Church League of America Seminar Plan, Wheaton, Illinois,Church League of America, En.d.J.
Communism and the NAACP, (2 volumes), Atlanta, Georgia Com-mission on Education, 1958.
Compromising Churches and Disobedient Preachers, New York,The American CounTi of Christin Churches, [n.d.j.
Constitution and By-Laws of the American Council of ChristianChurches, New York, TheAmerican Council of ChristianChurches, [n.d.j.
Cvetic, Matt, Extremists!, Tulsa, Christian Crusade, En.d.
Finger, John W., Introduction of J. B. Matthews at HunterCollege Auditorium, March~,~1955, WheatonIllinois,Church League of America, [n.d.I7T
Fourth Annual National Convention of Christian Crusade,Tulsa, Christian Crusade, 1962~
Graubard, Mark, Marxist Brainwashing in Our High Schools: AReview of Professor E. Merrill RootT s~bok0BRAINWASHINGIN THE HIGH S HLS,Wheaton, Illinois, Church Leagueof America, 1961.
The Great Divide, New York, The American Council of ChristianChurches.,Tn.d.J.
Hargis, Billy James, A Call to Action to Ever Real American,Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [n.d.T.
_, American Socialism...Moving AmericaDownhill, Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [n7.d.~T.
, Brotherhood of Man...A Smoke Screen,Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [n~d.J.
, The Communist Program for the AmericanFarmer, Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [n.d..
, Facts about Christian Crusade, Tulsa,Christian Crusad, T[.7
147
Hargis, Billy James, Fourth of July Radio Broadcast, Tulsa,Christian Crusade, 1961.
, Good Reasons for Fighting Communism,Tulsa, Christian Crusade, tn.d.I.
, Lest We Forget, Tulsa, ChristianCrusade, [n.d.).
, The Muzzli of General Walker, Tulsa,Christian Crusade, L7~d'7
, The National Council of Churches In-dicts Itself, Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [n.d.~7.
, Paul Revere's Ride, Tulsa, ChristianCrusade, Ln.d.'].
, The Postal Propaganda Problem, Tulsa,Christian Crusade, fn.d.).
, Radicalism of the Left--Americans forDemocratic Action, Tulsa, Christian Crusade,Tnd.JT
, The Strange Death of Povl Bn-Jensen,Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [n~d
, The Summit: Anti-Communist Youth Uni-versity, Tulsa, Christian Crusade, Ln.d.~}.
_, Threats to Christian Education, Tulsa,Christian Crusade, 'n.dJ.
CuThe Truth About UNESCO, Tulsa, Christian
, The Ugly Truth About Drew Pearson,Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [n.d.J.
Uncle Sam M.D.?, Tulsa, Christian Crusade,[.d.J.
, The United Nations: Destroying America7y Degrees, Tulsas,~Christian Crusde, U1.d .3.
, Unmasking the Deceiver: Martin LutherKing, Jr., Tulsa, Christian Crusade, En.TdT
, Unto God's Glory, Tulsa, ChristianCrusade, En.d.).
148
Hargis, Billy James, What Can You Do To Save Our Country?,Tulsa, Christian Crusade,7Li7.d.J .
, What's Wrong with America?, Tulsa,Christian Crusade,[n. d.J.
, What's Wrong with Jesus?, Tulsa,Christian Crusade7n.d.J .
, Will the Real Nikita Khrushchev PleaseStand U Tulsa, Chr iisian Crusade, d
Highlights of the Anti-Communist Leadership School, Tulsa,Christian Crusade, 19b2.
How Do You Stand?: Questionnaire to Candidates forCongress,Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [h.d.J .
How Long to Live?, New York, The American Council ofChristian Churches, [n.d..
If You Don't Know What Communism is All About..Read the BIGDecision, Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [n.d.J.
Important Pro-American Literature EVERY American SHOULDREAD!, Tulsa, Christian Crusade, En.d.,.
Know Your Bible Better!, Tulsa, Christian Crusade, 5n.d.J.
Leatherbury, John R., I Am Out of the Council of Churches!,Tulsa, Christian Crusade, T 6T.
MacRae, Allan A., Why I Cannot Accept the Revised StandardVersion, New York, The American Council of ChristianChurches, fn.d.J .
Mass Circulation Campaign, Tulsa, Christian Crusade, [n.d.J.
McIntire, Carl, The Ecclesiastical and Political Alliance on"the Left" ind the Use of "Hatemongering" As An Ecclesi-astical andPoliticalWea pon, Wheaton, Illinois, ChurchLeague of~~merica, jn.d. .
. The New Bible, Revised Standard Version: WhyChristians Should NotAccep t It, Collingswood, NewJersey, Christian Bec7on, Inc., 1953.
Must Freedom Perish?, New York, The American Council ofChristian Churches, [n.d.J.
National Council of Churches: What It Is; What It Does, NewYork, Nationl Council of Churches, Fn~.d.j.
149
Pamphlets and Books Available on the R.S.V., Wheaton, Illinois,Church League of America, n.d.j.
Price List for Publications of the Church League of America,Wheaton, Illinois, Church League of America,7WJ7d..
Public Records on Affiliations of Edwin T. Dahl , Wheaton,Illinois, Church League of~America,~~n.d..
Suggested Literature and Organizations, Tulsa, ChristianCrusade, [n.d.7.
Ten Directors of the NAACP, Atlanta, Georgia Commission onEducation, 1957.
Testimony to Christ and A Witness for Freedom, Collingswood,New Jersey, 20th Century Reformation Hour, 1962.
What Is the Church League of America?, Wheaton, Illinois,Church League of Amirica, ~ndj..
Which for America?, New York, The American Council ofChristian Churches, [n.d.i1.
Why You Cantt Build Your Church, New York, The American. Council of ChristianChurches, fn.d.J.
Willoughby, C. A., The Summit and the Pit, Tulsa, ChristianCrusade, En.d.-
Encyclopedia Articles
Kuhn, Harold B., "Fundamentalism," Baker's Dictionary ofTheology, edited by Everett F. Harri Rn, Grand RapTds,Baker Book House, 1960.
Woolley, Paul, "American Council of Christian Churches,"Twentieth Century Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge,edited by Lffertts scher, Grand Rapids, BakerBook House, 1955.
Public Documents
Hoover, J. Edgar, One Nation's Response to Communism, Wash-ington, United States Information Agency, 1960.
House of Representatives, "Beliefs and Principles of theJohn Birch Society," Congressional Record, June 12, 1960.
150
House of Representatives, Guide to Subversive Oranizat sand Publications, Washington, Government PrintingOTice, 1961.
, H. Concurrent Resolution 145,Washington, Government Printing Office, April "0~~ 1959.
, Hearings before the Committee on
Appropriations, Washington, Government Printing Office,1961.
, Investigation of Communist Activi-
ties in the New York C Area, Partis 1-8, Wahington,Government Printing Office, 1953.
, Issues Presented bly Air ReserveCenter Training Manual, Washington, Government PrintingOffice, 1960.
, Testimony of Bishop G. BromleyOxnam, Washington,Government Printing Office, 1954.
, "The Voice of the People AgainstFederal Aid to Education," Congressional Record,May 8, 1957.
, "Yellow Journalism," CongressionalRecord, January 9, 1961.
A Primer on Communism: 200 Questions and Answers, Washington,United States Inforimation Agency,~95T
U. S. Senate, Hearings before the Committee on Appropriations,Washington, Government Printing Office, 1949.
, Expose of Soviet Espionage, May 1960, Washing-ton, Government Printing Office, 1960.
Magazines
Christian Crusade, Tulsa, 1945 to 1963.
Oklahoma-Arkansas Synod Presbyterian Review, Oklahoma City,
April,962.
Newspapers
Atlanta Constitution, August 2, 1958.
151
Atlanta Journal, August 3, 1958.
Atlanta Journal-Constitution, August 10, 1958.
Austin Texas Observer, June 29, 1962.
Boston Sunday Globe, January 6, 1963.
Christian Beacon, Collingswood, New Jersey, 1945 to 1963.
New York Times, 1945 to 1963.
News & Views, Wheaton, Illinois, 1945 to 1963.
The We Crusader, Tulsa, 1960 to 1963.
Interviews
Hargis, Billy James, President, Christian Crusade, at Dallas,Texas, December 8, 1962.
King, Martin Luther, Jr., President, Southern ChristianLeadership Conference, at Dallas, Texas, January 4, 1963.
McIntire, Carl, Editor, Christian Beacon, at Chicago,Illinois, December 28, 192
McIntire, Carl Thomas, son of Carl McIntire, at Chicago,Illinois, December 28, 1962.
Walker, Edwin A., former Major General, United States Army,at Dallas, Texas, June 5, 1963.
Correspondence
Block, Herbert, cartoonist for The Washington Post, July 12,1963.
Bundy, Edgar C., Executive Secretary, Church League of Amer-ica, May 5, 1962 and December 19, 1962.
Cooley, Martin I., official, Devin-Adair Company, February 28,1963.
Freedman, Theodore, Executive Director, Southwest Region,Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, February 6, 1963
Hargis, Billy James, President, Christian Crusade,February 7, 1963