+ All Categories
Home > Documents > THE RIGHT INVENTORY AT THE RIGHT TIME - MIT CTL and Dan.pdf · THE RIGHT INVENTORY AT THE RIGHT...

THE RIGHT INVENTORY AT THE RIGHT TIME - MIT CTL and Dan.pdf · THE RIGHT INVENTORY AT THE RIGHT...

Date post: 22-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
22
THE RIGHT INVENTORY AT THE RIGHT TIME Dynamic Customer Service Levels: Evolving Safety Stock Requirements for Changing Business Needs Dan Covert Joaquin Ortiz Advisor: Dr. Tugba Efendigil
Transcript
  • THE RIGHT INVENTORY AT THE RIGHT TIME

    Dynamic Customer Service Levels: Evolving Safety Stock Requirements for Changing Business NeedsDan CovertJoaquin OrtizAdvisor: Dr. Tugba Efendigil

  • INTRODUCTIONS

    Joaquin OrtizCuliacán Mexico

    ITESMCoppel

    Dan CovertPortland ME

    Colby CollegeAhold-Delhaize

    Dr. Tugba EfendigilIstanbul Turkey

    Yildiz Technical UniveristyMIT Research Scientist

  • AGENDA

    Company OverviewProblem StatementMethodologyResultsConclusion

  • 1,100 + Stores

    6 Distribution Centers

    $11.6 Billion in Sales/Year

    454 Million Cases/Year

    COMPANY OVERVIEW

  • NATURE OF THE INDUSTRY

    Food Lion

    High-low Pricing Strategy

    Strategic Safety Stock Investment

    Inventory Policy

  • NATURE OF THE INDUSTRY

  • PROBLEM

    Promotion begins

    Product ships

    More than Forecast

    Inventory Goes to 0

    Large order created –arrives 2 weeks later

    Promo EndsDC InventoryDC ShipmentsDC ReceiptsDC ForecastRetail Sales

  • WHY DON'T THEY TRUST THE SYSTEM?

    Current Policy

    ABC Segmentation

    Don't stock out!

    Manual Interventions

  • Inventory excess is less important

    Not be out of stock

    mentality

    Not enough safety stock

    CAUSES OF MISTRUST

    Formula doesn’t address any safety

    stock from promotion

    Missing on promotions results in more

    questions – can’t be out

    Cost of excess is a small factor

    Inventory turns goals are not set by

    category

    Would take time to set goals for

    each buyer

    Why can’t the company trust safety stock policy?

  • Vendor Dependable

    CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA

    Promotion SeasonalKey Item

    Important for the brand or

    company

    High and low demand

    depending on the season

    Consistently delivers critical product in full

    Item with a price reduction

  • Decision Frame

    95 97 95 97 94 96 94 96 90 92 90 92 88 90 80 83

    VD

    S S S S

    KI KI

    P

    VD VD VD VD VD VD VD

    16 Unique Cycle Service Level Classes

    DECISION FRAMEPKISVD

    PromotionKey ItemSeasonal

    Vendor Dependable

  • Inventory Policy

    Forecast between deliveries

    Safety Stock Level

    OrderSS = k * σl

    k• Safety stock factor• Cycle Service Level

    (CSL)• Probability that no

    stock out occurs during replenishment time

    • CSLs set by management after segementation

    σl• Standard deviation over

    lead time• Common to use:

    St. Dev. of demandSt. Dev. of forecast error

    Set using decision frame

    Test both through simulation

    INVENTORY POLICY

    Inventory when order arrives

  • SIMULATIONS

    Item Selection

    • CV vs. Avg. Weekly Demand

    • Fast and Slow Movers

    • Promoted and Non-Promoted

    • Seasonal and Non-Seasonal

    Simulations1. Fixed CSL

    2. Standard Deviation

    3. Dynamic

    4. Adjusted Dynamic

    *Selected Item

  • SYSTEM DYNAMICS (VENSIM)• User to easily adjust service levels • See immediate impacts on product availability and inventory.

    Better understanding of the dynamics of the process!

  • SYSTEM DYNAMICS (VENSIM)

  • SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODEL IN PRACTICE

  • RELEX

    • Current software provider

    • Easily customizable for a variety of

    simulations

    • Solutions can be implemented in

    production environment

  • RESULTS: STANDARD DEVIATION DIFFERENCE

    Takeaway• Safety Stock as a buffer against

    variability in forecast

    • Adjust using CSL not SD

    Results• SD of Demand

    • 5 % Inventory Reduction

    • 1 % Fill Rate Reduction

  • INITIAL SIMULATION RESULTS

  • ADJUSTED DYNAMIC VS. FIXED

    18% Inventory ReductionWith 91% Fill Rate

  • NEXT STEPS & TAKEAWAYS

    Next Steps• Apply dynamic CSLs across categories• Work on implementation

    Takeaways• Buffer for uncertainty in forecast• Use dynamic CSLs for items of varying importance• Incorporate decision makers in modeling process

    “Models need to be embedded in the human decision makingprocess, and not the other way around” (Jan C. Fransoo, 2008)

  • QUESTIONS?


Recommended