+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The role of CCS in UK's power sector decarbonisation using ... · terms of CCS, we see CCGT-CCS and...

The role of CCS in UK's power sector decarbonisation using ... · terms of CCS, we see CCGT-CCS and...

Date post: 30-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
2050 2030 The role of CCS in UK's power sector decarbonisation using high spatial and temporal resolution modelling Praveen Bains a , Clara F. Heuberger a,b , Niall Mac Dowell a,b, * a Centre for Environmental Policy, b Centre for Process Systems Engineering Electricity demand Reserve requirements Inertia requirements Emission target min { CAPEX + mode-specific OPEX } System capacities design Power dispatch Reserve and inertia provision Carbon emissions by technology Flexibility of power generating units Detailed capital and operational costs References [1] Heuberger, C.; Rubin, E.S.; Staffel, I.; Shah, N. and Mac Dowell, N. (2017) “Power capacity expansion planning considering endogenous technological learning”, Applied Energy: Vol 204, pp 831-845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.075 [2] Strbac, G.; Kirschen, D. and Moreno, R. (2016), “Reliability Standards for the Operation and Planning of Future Electricity Networks”, Foundations and Trends in Electric Energy Systems: Vol. 1, No. 3, pp 143–219. DOI: 10.1561/3100000001. [3] Pfenninger, S. and Staffel, I. Renewables.ninja. www.renewables.ninja Fig. 1: Zonal design and representative transmission network for Great Britain [2] System-wide constraints Tech.-wise constraints Integer scheduling Objective System design The maps above illustrate the new capabilities of ESONE. We see an immediate increase in power imported from the south, and see increased power flowing from Scotland to England as offshore wind comes online. In terms of CCS, we see CCGT-CCS and BECCS built by the end of 2050, mostly in southern Scotland and across England, but they are hardly utilised. They mainly function as low carbon backup for a mostly renewable fleet, and provide ancillary services to the grid. Motivation Typical energy system capacity expansion models consider resources aggregated at the national scale. But how do we capture the nuance of energy factors that are highly site-specific? What type of power technologies should be built? When should they be built? ESONE: Spatially-explicit electricity system optimisation We built a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) which simultaneously optimises the electricity system design and operation. ESONE Capabilities: when and where does CCS come into play? Acknowledgements We thank the IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEAGHG) and MESMERISE-CCS by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under grant EP/M001369/1 for the funding of this work. We acknowledge financial support of the UK CCS Research Centre. The UKCCSRC is funded by the EPSRC as part of the RCUK Energy Programme. Mathematical Description: Where should they be built? How should they be operated? *Corresponding author, Tel.: +44 (0)20 7594 9298; E-mail: [email protected] Transmission between zones Transmission Annual Capacity Installed (GW) Annual Power Generated (TWh) Annual Power Flow (TWh) 2015 Resource availability was determined using average of multiple points within each zone Used k-means clustering to calculate 10 representative days + peak demand day for each zone chosen day centroid Data Preparation Fig. 2: Example of a cluster of time dependent input data for a single zone [3] Continue to validate ESONE model and finalise base case. Investigate the impact of regional electric vehicle growth rates, charging patterns and infrastructure installed Explore the value of tidal energy in an emissions-constrained energy system Future Work Fig. 3: A snapshot of the total installed capacity (right) and average annual capacity utilisation rate (left) for each 5-year time step over the entire optimisation time horizon. Carbon emissions are exogenously constrained on production (do not include imported electricity). 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Annual Average Utilisation Rate 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0 50 100 150 200 250 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Carbon Intensity (tCO2/MWh) Installed Capacity (GW) Nuclear Coal Bio CCGT OCGT CCGT-PostCCS BECCS Wind-Onshore Wind-Offshore Solar InterImp InterSto PHSto GenSto CI_prod CI_cons
Transcript
Page 1: The role of CCS in UK's power sector decarbonisation using ... · terms of CCS, we see CCGT-CCS and BECCS built by the end of 2050, mostly in southern Scotland and across England,

20

50

20

30

The role of CCS in UK's power sector decarbonisation using high spatial and temporal resolution modelling

Praveen Bainsa, Clara F. Heubergera,b, Niall Mac Dowella,b,*a Centre for Environmental Policy, b Centre for Process Systems Engineering

• Electricity demand• Reserve requirements• Inertia requirements • Emission target

min { CAPEX + mode-specific OPEX }

• System capacities design• Power dispatch• Reserve and inertia provision • Carbon emissions by technology • Flexibility of power generating units• Detailed capital and operational costs

References[1] Heuberger, C.; Rubin, E.S.; Staffel, I.; Shah, N. and Mac Dowell, N. (2017) “Power capacity expansion planning considering endogenous technological learning”, Applied Energy: Vol 204, pp 831-845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.075[2] Strbac, G.; Kirschen, D. and Moreno, R. (2016), “Reliability Standards for the Operation and Planning of Future Electricity Networks”, Foundations and Trends in Electric Energy Systems: Vol. 1, No. 3, pp 143–219. DOI: 10.1561/3100000001. [3] Pfenninger, S. and Staffel, I. Renewables.ninja. www.renewables.ninja

Fig. 1: Zonal design and representative transmission network for Great Britain [2]

System-wide constraints

Tech.-wise constraints

Integer scheduling

Objective

System design

The maps above illustrate the new capabilities of ESONE. We see an immediate increase in power imported from the south, and see increased power flowing from Scotland to England as offshore wind comes online. In terms of CCS, we see CCGT-CCS and BECCS built by the end of 2050, mostly in southern Scotland and across England, but they are hardly utilised. They mainly function as low carbon backup for a mostly renewable fleet, and provide ancillary services to the grid.

Motivation Typical energy system capacity expansion models consider resources aggregated at the national scale. But how do we capture the nuance of energy factors that are highly site-specific?

What type of power technologies should be built?

When should they be built?

ESONE: Spatially-explicit electricity system optimisation

We built a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) which simultaneously optimises the electricity system design and operation.

ESONE Capabilities: when and where does CCS come into play?

AcknowledgementsWe thank the IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEAGHG) and MESMERISE-CCS by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under grant EP/M001369/1 for the funding of this work. We acknowledge financial support of the UK CCS Research Centre. The UKCCSRC is funded by the EPSRC as part of the RCUK Energy Programme.

Mathematical Description:

Where should they be built?

How should they be operated?

*Corresponding author, Tel.: +44 (0)20 7594 9298; E-mail: [email protected]

• Transmission between zonesTransmission

Annual Capacity Installed (GW) Annual Power Generated (TWh) Annual Power Flow (TWh)

20

15

Resource availability was determined using average of multiple points within each zone

Used k-means clustering to calculate 10 representative days + peak demand day for each zone

chosen day

centroid

Data Preparation

Fig. 2: Example of a cluster of time dependent input data for a single zone [3]

• Continue to validate ESONE model and finalise base case.• Investigate the impact of regional electric vehicle growth rates, charging

patterns and infrastructure installed• Explore the value of tidal energy in an emissions-constrained energy system

Future Work

Fig. 3: A snapshot of the total installed capacity (right) and average annual capacity utilisation rate (left) for each 5-year time step over the entire optimisation time horizon. Carbon emissions are exogenously constrained on production (do not include imported electricity).

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

An

nu

al A

vera

ge U

tilis

atio

n R

ate

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0

50

100

150

200

250

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050

Car

bo

n In

ten

sity

(tC

O2

/MW

h)

Inst

alle

d C

apac

ity

(GW

)

Nuclear Coal Bio

CCGT OCGT CCGT-PostCCS

BECCS Wind-Onshore Wind-Offshore

Solar InterImp InterSto

PHSto GenSto CI_prod

CI_cons

Recommended