+ All Categories
Home > Documents > THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN...

THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN...

Date post: 25-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: vankhanh
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
11
Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 45, No. 4, 506-516, 1997. THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF SMECTITE TO CHLORITE LORI BETFISON-VARGA 1 AND IAN D. R. MACKINNON 2 Department of Geology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691 Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia QLD 4072, Australia Abstract--Vesicular and groundmass phyllosilicates in a hydrothermally altered basalt from the Point Sal ophiolite, California, have been studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Pore-filling phyllosilicates are texturally characterized as having coherent, relatively thick and defect-free crystals of chlorite (14 _A) with occasional 24-.~ periodicities. Groundmass phyllosilicates are texturally characterized as 1) randomly oriented crystals up to 200 A in width and 2) larger, more coherent crystals up to 1000 in width. Small crystallites contain predominantly 14-.~ layers with some 24-.~ units. Large crystals show randomly interlayered chlorite/smectite (C/S), with approximately 50% chlorite on average. Adja- cent smectite-like layers are not uncommon in the groundmass phyllosilicates. Electron microprobe anal- yses show that Fe/Mg ratios of both groundmass and vesicular phyllosilicates are fairly constant. Termination of brucite-like interlayers has been identified in some of the TEM images. The transfor- mation mechanisms represented by these layer terminations are 1) growth of a brucite-like interlayer within smectite interlayer regions and 2) the dissolution and reprecipitation of elements to form chlorite layers. Both mechanisms require an increase in volume as smectite transforms to chlorite. The data, combined with that from previously published reports, suggest that randomly interlayered C/S is a metastable phase formed in microenvironments with low water/rock ratios. Chlorite forms in microenvironments in the same sample dominated by higher water/rock ratios. The relatively constant number of Mg's in the structure (Mg#) of both structures indicates that in both microenvironments the bulk rock composition has influence over the composition of phyllosilicates. Key Words--Chlorite, Corrensite, Hydrothermal Metamorphism, Random Interlayered Chlorite/Smectite, Smectite, Transmission Electron Microscopy. INTRODUCTION Smectite and chlorite are ubiquitous products of the diagenesis and low-temperature metamorphism of in- termediate to mafic volcanic rocks and volcanogenic sediments. Although much has been learned about the transition from smectite to chlorite, the complex struc- tural and compositional changes that accompany the transformation have not been completely deciphered. Previous work suggests that the transformation of smectite to chlorite occurs in response to an increase in temperature, with progressively higher proportions of chlorite forming as temperature rises (Hoffman and Hower 1979; Horton 1985; Bettison and Schiffman 1988). The range in proportion of expandable layers varies for different occurrences of these mixed-layered phyllosilicates. More recently, the role of fluid com- position, porosity and water/rock ratio in determining the stability of phases in any given sequence of rocks has been recognized (Shau and Peacor 1992; Schiff- man and Staudigel 1995). The gradual or continuous transformation of smec- tite to chlorite, as accommodated through randomly interlayered S/C (with various percentages of expand- able layers) and regularly interlayered C/S (corrensite), has been reported from metabasalts (Bettison and Schiffman 1988; Bevins et al. 1991) and sediments (Helmhold and van der Kamp 1984; Chang et al. 1986). However, a discontinuous decrease in smectite proportion, whereby smectite (with less than 20% chlorite), corrensite and chlorite (with less than 10% smectite) occur with increasing temperature, has been reported from diagenetic and hydrothermal environ- ments (Inoue et al. 1984; Inoue 1987; Inoue and Utada 1991; Schiffman and Staudigel 1995). Presumably, the differences in the transformation process are reflected in the geologic controls of the specific environment (Alt et al. 1986). Schiffman and Staudigel (1995) most recently point to the pervasive alteration of La Palma volcanics as evidence of high water/rock ratios and suggest that the discontinuous transformation of smectite to corrensite to chlorite is favored under these conditions. The treatment of corrensite as a thermodynamically defined phase has been supported by phase relations and structural models arising from detailed chemical and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses (Inoue and Uta- da 1991; Beaufort and Meunier 1994) and TEM/AEM (atomic emission microscopy) (Shau et al. 1990). The stabilization of corrensite occurs through significant modification of tetrahedral layers (Shau et al. 1990; Meunier et al. 1991; Beaufort and Meunier 1994). Shau et al. (1990) and Beaufort and Meunier (1994) Copyright 1997, The Clay Minerals Society 506
Transcript
Page 1: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

Clays and Clay Minerals, Vol. 45, No. 4, 506-516, 1997.

THE ROLE OF R A N D O M L Y M I X E D - L A Y E R E D CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE T R A N S F O R M A T I O N OF

SMECTITE TO CHLORITE

LORI BETFISON-VARGA 1 AND IAN D. R. MACKINNON 2

Department of Geology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691

Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia QLD 4072, Australia

Abstract--Vesicular and groundmass phyllosilicates in a hydrothermally altered basalt from the Point Sal ophiolite, California, have been studied using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Pore-filling phyllosilicates are texturally characterized as having coherent, relatively thick and defect-free crystals of chlorite (14 _A) with occasional 24-.~ periodicities. Groundmass phyllosilicates are texturally characterized as 1) randomly oriented crystals up to 200 A in width and 2) larger, more coherent crystals up to 1000

in width. Small crystallites contain predominantly 14-.~ layers with some 24-.~ units. Large crystals show randomly interlayered chlorite/smectite (C/S), with approximately 50% chlorite on average. Adja- cent smectite-like layers are not uncommon in the groundmass phyllosilicates. Electron microprobe anal- yses show that Fe/Mg ratios of both groundmass and vesicular phyllosilicates are fairly constant.

Termination of brucite-like interlayers has been identified in some of the TEM images. The transfor- mation mechanisms represented by these layer terminations are 1) growth of a brucite-like interlayer within smectite interlayer regions and 2) the dissolution and reprecipitation of elements to form chlorite layers. Both mechanisms require an increase in volume as smectite transforms to chlorite.

The data, combined with that from previously published reports, suggest that randomly interlayered C/S is a metastable phase formed in microenvironments with low water/rock ratios. Chlorite forms in microenvironments in the same sample dominated by higher water/rock ratios. The relatively constant number of Mg's in the structure (Mg#) of both structures indicates that in both microenvironments the bulk rock composition has influence over the composition of phyllosilicates.

Key Words--Chlorite, Corrensite, Hydrothermal Metamorphism, Random Interlayered Chlorite/Smectite, Smectite, Transmission Electron Microscopy.

INTRODUCTION

Smectite and chlorite are ubiquitous products of the diagenesis and low-temperature metamorphism of in- termediate to mafic volcanic rocks and volcanogenic sediments. Although much has been learned about the transition from smectite to chlorite, the complex struc- tural and compositional changes that accompany the transformation have not been completely deciphered. Previous work suggests that the transformation of smectite to chlorite occurs in response to an increase in temperature, with progressively higher proportions of chlorite forming as temperature rises (Hoffman and Hower 1979; Horton 1985; Bettison and Schiffman 1988). The range in proportion of expandable layers varies for different occurrences of these mixed-layered phyllosilicates. More recently, the role of fluid com- position, porosity and water/rock ratio in determining the stability of phases in any given sequence of rocks has been recognized (Shau and Peacor 1992; Schiff- man and Staudigel 1995).

The gradual or continuous transformation of smec- tite to chlorite, as accommodated through randomly interlayered S/C (with various percentages of expand- able layers) and regularly interlayered C/S (corrensite), has been reported from metabasalts (Bettison and Schiffman 1988; Bevins et al. 1991) and sediments

(Helmhold and van der Kamp 1984; Chang et al. 1986). However, a discontinuous decrease in smectite proportion, whereby smectite (with less than 20% chlorite), corrensite and chlorite (with less than 10% smectite) occur with increasing temperature, has been reported from diagenetic and hydrothermal environ- ments (Inoue et al. 1984; Inoue 1987; Inoue and Utada 1991; Schiffman and Staudigel 1995).

Presumably, the differences in the transformation process are reflected in the geologic controls of the specific environment (Alt et al. 1986). Schiffman and Staudigel (1995) most recently point to the pervasive alteration of La Palma volcanics as evidence of high water/rock ratios and suggest that the discontinuous transformation of smectite to corrensite to chlorite is favored under these conditions.

The treatment of corrensite as a thermodynamically defined phase has been supported by phase relations and structural models arising from detailed chemical and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses (Inoue and Uta- da 1991; Beaufort and Meunier 1994) and TEM/AEM (atomic emission microscopy) (Shau et al. 1990). The stabilization of corrensite occurs through significant modification of tetrahedral layers (Shau et al. 1990; Meunier et al. 1991; Beaufort and Meunier 1994). Shau et al. (1990) and Beaufort and Meunier (1994)

Copyright �9 1997, The Clay Minerals Society 506

Page 2: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

Vol. 45, No. 4, 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507

show that the corrensite structure cannot be viewed as chlorite- and smectite-like stacks, despite the fact that corrensite often has a composition intermediate be- tween the two. With the acceptance of corrensite as a phase, the existence of random smectite-chlorite inter- layering has been called into question. Robertson (1989) and Shau et al. (1990) have suggested that XRD patterns interpreted as randomly interstratified C/S or S/C may be more correctly modelled as inter- layered chlorite/corrensite or smectite/corrensite (Shau et al. 1990). However, the occurrence of R = 0 inter- layered S/C has been documented in metamorphosed basalts (Bettison-Varga et al. 1991; Shau and Peacor 1992).

Shau and Peacor (1992) and Schiffman and Stau- digel (1995) argue that randomly interlayered C/S oc- curs as a result of incomplete recrystallization during low fluid/rock alteration. Their work suggests that the. permeability structure of metabasalts may in fact pro- vide a significant control over the structure and com- position of the interlayered mafic phyllosilicates. In this study, detailed high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) examination of a metabasalt from the Point Sal ophiol- ite, California, has been undertaken in order to inves- tigate the nature of mafic phyllosilicates in ground- mass and vesicle-filling occurrences. This work dem- onstrates the presence of randomly interlayered C/S under conditions of pervasive alteration and interprets these observations in terms of potential transformation processes in hydrothermally altered rocks.

PREVIOUS WORK

The Point Sal remnant of the Jurassic Coast Range ophiolite is located in central California. The geology of the ophiolite has been described by Hopson et al. (1975) and consists of the standard sequence of pillow lavas, sheeted dike or sill complex, a plutonic member and harzburgite. This ophiolite sequence exhibits the effects of submarine hydrothermal alteration, as de- scribed by Schiffman et al. (1986).

XRD and microprobe analyses of the mafic phyt- losilicates in the lava and dike units are reported by Bettison and Schiffman (1988). Smectite, randomly in- terlayered C/S with both smectite and chlorite present in amounts >50%, corrensite, chlorite and celadonite occur in the ophiolite. The proportion of expandable layers decreases in the mixed-layered phases with in- crease in depth in the ophiolite pseudostratigraphy. The phyllosilicate zonation roughly parallels the calc- silicate paragenesis, in which smectite and interlayered C/S occur in zeolite and pumpellyite facies volcanic rocks and epidote occurs with chlorite in the dike unit. HRTEM investigations of 5 samples from the Point Sal suite are reported by Bettison-Varga et al. (1991). TEM observations generally confirm the percentage of chlorite layers determined using XRD and microprobe analyses and the existence of.randomly interlayered

chlorite(<0.5)/smectite has been confirmed in 1 spec- imen.

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

Sample 1A-25, from the Upper Lava unit of the Point Sal ophiolite (Bettison and Schiffman 1988), was selected for study. Preparation of oriented aggre- gates for XRD analyses is described in Bettison and Schiffman (1988). Clay mineral separates were ana- lysed on a Diano 8000 X-ray diffractometer using graphite-monochromated CuKet radiation. The exis- tence of irrational (001) basal reflection positions from XRD patterns of the Mg-saturated, glycerol-solvated samples is the basis for identification of interlayering of smectite and chlorite in sample 1A-25.

Sections 3 mm in diameter were cut from doubly polished thin sections and thinned by argon milling using a Gatan duo ion mill. This technique allows for correlation between optical petrography and HRTEM images. Ion-milling conditions were 5 kV and 25 ~ in- cident angle until perforation, followed by 15 ~ and 1 kV milling for more than 8 h. Samples were analyzed at 400 kV using a Jeol 4000FX analytical electron mi- croscope (AEM).

Compositional analyses were performed using a Ca- meca SX-50 electron microprobe. Wavelength disper- sive analyses were performed using a 1-1xm beam at 15 kV and 10 nA beam current. The silicate and oxide standards used with "ZAF" matrix corrections are as follows: bytownite (Na), tremolite (Mg, Si), anorthite (A1), orthoclase (K), wollastonite (Ca), TiO2 (Ti), rho- donite (Mn) and fayalite (Fe).

RESULTS

X-ray Diffraction and Petrography

As previously reported by Bettison and Schiffman (1988), XRD results for sample 1A-25 indicate the presence of randomly interlayered C/S, discrete chlo- rite and celadonite. Sample preparations that were air- dried, MgC12-saturated, glycolated and heated to 550 ~ produced identifiable reflections of the above min- erals (Figure 1). Randomly interlayered C/S is identi- fied by the presence of nonintegral (001) and (002) spacings. However, Shau et al. (1990) suggest that nonintegral spacings such as these can be produced from mixed-layered chlorite/corrensite.

Phyllosilicates in the basalt occur primarily as ves- icle and vein fillings and as replacement of fine- grained mesostasis. Green-colored chlorite completely fills vesicles and shows a coarse grain size from rim to core. Pale green-colored mixed-layered C/S and mi- nor chlorite occur as fine-grained patches within the groundmass. Chlorite has anomalous blue interference colors and weak birefringence, whereas mixed-layered C/S has weak to moderate birefringence and 1 ~ inter- ference colors. Analcime and laumontite occur as ves- icle fillings and plagioclase is not albitized.

Page 3: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

508 Bettison-Varga and Mackinnon Clays and Clay Minerals

C/S ~ C/C/S

C/S

C

/A

CE C

CE

I ~

5 ~ 10 o 15 ~

Figure 1. XRD pattern of randomly interlayered chlorite/ smectite (C/S) from sample 1A-25. Discrete chlorite (C), dis- crete smectite (S) and celadonite (CE) are also evident in the diffraction pattern. A) Mg-saturated, B) glycerol-solvated, C) KCl-saturated and D) heated at 550 ~ (from Bettison and Schiffman 1988).

High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy

Guthrie and Veblen (1989) have shown that, for lay- er silicate structures, HRTEM images can be reliably interpreted with the aid of computer simulation pack- ages that incorporate multi-slice calculations devel- oped from the theory of Cowley and Moodie (1957). Simulation of corrensite phase contrast images at 70 ~m defocus using the multi-slice program by Stadel- mann (1991) shows the correlation between the 1:1 structure for chlorite and the TEM images that follow (Figure 2a). In this analysis for chlorite, the darkest fringes correspond to the brucite-like interlayer of the structure. Under the experimental conditions used, the

combination of 3 light fringes and 2 dark fringes cor- relates with the tetrahedral-octahedral-tetrahedral lay- ers of chlorite and/or smectite.

TEM images of phyllosilicates replacing glassy groundmass show 2 distinctive morphologies. The 1st morphology consists of thin crystallites less than 200 .~ across arranged in a mesh-like manner. Periodicities of 10/k, 14 .~ and 24 .~ are common and an example is shown in Figure 2b. In addition, larger, more co- herent crystals up to 1000 ,~ in width occur within the groundmass. Examination of vesicle-filling phyllosili- cates indicate that chlorite is the predominant phase as shown for pore-filling chlorite in Figure 3. The crys- tals are large and coherent, with rare layer mistakes (10/~); but, more commonly, they show layer defects at the edges.

Figure 4 shows a sequence of chlorite-like and smectite-like fringes with no apparent ordering for any of the following arrangements: smectite and chlorite, smectite/corrensite or chlorite/corrensite. The se- quence as shown in the image is as follows from upper right to lower left arrow: CSCCSCCSCSSCSCC(out of focus)CSCCCSCSCCSSCSCSCSCSSCSSCSCSS- CSCSSCSS (C = chlorite-like and S = smectite-like layers). This sequence could either be interpreted as corrensite (SC alternations) interlayered with discrete smectite and chlorite, or as randomly interlayered C/S. The latter interpretation is supported by the occurrence of adjacent smectites within the sequence. Both CCS and SSC repetitions occur within the sequence shown in Figure 4. The sequence comprises 48% 10-~ and 52% 14-/~ layers. This approximate 50:50 distribution of chlorite and smectite is characteristic of the ground- mass mixed-layered phyllosilicates imaged with TEM. A selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern from this area (Figure 4, inset) shows irrational reflec- tions, consistent with an interpretation of random in- terlayering of chlorite and smectite sequences.

Figure 5 is a higher-magnification image that shows predominantly chlorite. In this figure, a change in se- quence, in which a 28-_A spacing is reduced to a 24-/~ spacing at both ends, is evident. A brucite-like inter- layer appears to terminate into the boundary between the 10-A and 14-,~ fringes. The presence of the bruc- ite-like layer necessitates a volume increase and in- volves the transformation of smectite-like interlayers to the brucite-like interlayer of chlorite. Layers on ei- ther side of the brucite-like layer are continuous and bend with the distortion.

Figure 6 shows a sequence of chlorite-like and smectite-like fringes with no indication of ordering. Adjacent smectite layers occur in this packet of 74% chlorite and 26% smectite; the figure shows a magni- fication of that sequence composed of 46% smectite and 54% chlorite. Within this area 2 changes in se- quence occur between chlorite-like layers that are un- like the transformation shown in Figure 5. As shown

Page 4: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

Vol. 45, No. 4, 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 509

Figure 2. a) Image simulation for two 24-A units. The dark fringes between thick, bright fringes correspond to the brucite- like interlayer, b) TEM latticc fringe image of (001) plane of interstratified chlorite (14 A) and collapsed smectite-like layers (10 A) with two 24-A units in succession indicated between the white arrows. Thin crystallites such as these are a common groundmass replacement.

in Figure 6, the 1st transformation occurs between a pair of brucite-like interlayers. For example, between the heavy black fringes (the brucite-like layers) shown by the black arrows on the left is the sequence B T-O-T T-O-T B T-O-T T-O-T B which converts to B T-O-T T-O-T T-O-T B as the middle brucite-like layer ends within a smectite-like T-O-T sequence (T = tet- rahedral, O = octahedral and B = brucite-like layers). The 2nd change in sequence, shown between the 2 black arrows on the right, again results in the brucite- like interlayer ending within a T-O-T, indicating the conversion of a smectite (T-O-T) layer to a T-O-T B T-O-T sequence. Layers on either side of the brucite layer remain intact and bend around the expanded area.

Electron Microprobe Analysis

Table 1 presents microprobe data for vesicle-filling and groundmass replacement phyllosilicates. Note that

Figure 3. Typical TEM lattice fringe image of large, coher- ent crystals of chlorite from a vesicle.

chlorite analyses show the presence of Ca, Na and K, indicating some minor contamination by corrensite- or smectite-like expandable layers (Bettison and Schiff- man 1988; Shau et al. 1990). Potassium contents are higher than normal, suggesting the presence of cela- donite in the groundmass phyllosilicates. Celadonite is present in the sample, as determined petrographically and using XRD data. However, a comparison of K20 content of samples with high K with octahedral cations (GaUahan and Duncan 1994) combined with the total A1 indicates that these specific analyses are not char- acterized by significant amounts of a dioctahedral phase.

Smectite, corrensite and chlorite should have non- interlayer cation totals of 15.9, 17.0 and 17.85, re- spectively, when calculated on a 25 oxygen equivalent basis (Schiffman and Staudigel 1995). As indicated by cation totals, vesicle-filling phyllosilicates are chlorite (17.46-17.73), whereas groundmass phyllosilicates are chlorite and mixed-layered C/S (16.4-17.71). Two analyses have noninterlayer cation totals of approxi- mately 17.0. However, corrensite cannot be identified from the XRD pattern. TEM images confirm the lack of significant R = 1 S/C ordering. The A1 content in- creases with an increase in noninterlayer cations, as shown in Figure 7a. The range in Mg/(Mg + Fe) con- tent of the phyllosilicates (Figure 7b) is narrow and most likely reflects the bulk rock composition (Betti- son and Schiffman 1988).

DISCUSSION

Random Interlayering

The existence of randomly interlayered C/S has been disputed by some (Roberson 1988, 1989) while o ther workers suggest that random, mixed-layered chlorite and smectite forms at low temperatures under nonequiiibrium conditions favoring disorder rather

Page 5: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

510 Bettison-Varga and Mackinnon Clays and Clay Minerals

Figure 4. TEM lattice fringe image of randomly interlayered C/S with the following sequence shown between the arrows: (upper right arrow)CSCCSCCSCSSCSCC(out of focus)CSCCCSCSCCSSCSCSCSCSSCSSCSCSSCSCSSCSS (lower left ar- row). The sequence consists of 48% 10-,~ (S) and 52% 14 A (C) layers. SAED pattern inset shows irrational 00l reflections.

than order (e.g., Shau et al. 1990). Interfingering of S-C repetit ions in packets of either smecti te or chlorite can result in nonintegral spacings on X R D patterns that g ive rise to the classic interpretation of an R = 0

Figure 5. TEM lattice fringe image of brucite-like interlayer (arrow) growing in smectite interlayer ~ The layers bend around the defect and go from 24 A to 28 A and back to 24 ,&.

structure, as determined using the program NEW- M O D � 9 (Reynolds 1985; Roberson 1989). Shau et al. (1990) and Roberson (1989) propose that such struc- tures are more accurately described as smectite/corren- site and chlori te/corrensite interstratifications.

Images showing large packets of regular alternation of chlori te-l ike and smecti te-l ike layers (such as those several hundred ,& in extent shown by Shau et al. 1990 and Schiffman and Staudigel 1995) and which exhibit sharp superlattice peaks on X R D patterns are strong ev idence for the existence of corrensite. However, the occurrence of SC alternations within packets of either smecti te- or chlori te-l ike layers may not warrant the interpretation of those interlayerings as smectite/cor- rensite or chlorite/corrensite. In the images obtained in this study (Figures 4 and 5), the relat ive proportions o f smecti te and chlori te are each approximately 50%. However , none of the images records long repetitions o f structurally coherent alternating layers of 10 A and 14 ,~. Instead, this 50:50 composi t ion appears to be the result of random mixing of smecti te and chlorite. Both adjacent 10-,& and adjacent 14-A layers are com- mon in the sequences imaged.

I f one were to consider 5 repetit ions of SC alter- nations as evidence for corrensite, then one might con-

Page 6: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

Vol. 45, No. 4, 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 511

Figure 6. HRTEM image of randomly interlayered C/S with the following sequence between the white arrows: (top ar- row)CCSCSCCCCCCSSCSCSCSSCSSCSSCCSCSC(out of focus)SSCCSSC. The sequence consists of 46% smectite-like and 54% chlorite-like layers. Two defects are shown by the pairs of black arrows. The arrows on the left show B T-O-T T-O-T B T-O-T T-O-T B converting to B T-O-T T-O-T T- O-T B. The arrows on the right again show a brucite-like layer ending within a T-O-T layer. Layers on either side of the brucite-like layer bend around the expanded area.

s ider severa l repet i t ions o f SSC or CCS (Figures 4 and 5) as ev idence for l ong- range order ing. In fact, J iang and Peaco r (1994) repor t l imi ted occur rences of long- range order ing, R2 and R3 C/S interstrat i f icat ions, in samples f r o m peli t ic uni t s o f the Gaspe Peninsula .

T E M ana lyses of se rpent ine /ch lor i te in te r layered min- erals led Banf ie ld et al. (1994) to sugges t tha t transi- t ions o f layer si l icates occur sequent ia l ly in w h i c h the 1st inters t rat i f ied minera l to fo rm is a 50 :50 mix ture of the 2 l ayer si l icates, fo l lowed by a sequence of lon-

ger- range order ing (for example , t r ans fo rmat ion of " a " to " b " produces a, ab, abb, abbb). W h i l e this sugges t ion migh t be appl ied to the S/C t r ans fo rmat ion

and be suppor ted by the lack o f s ignif icant occur rences of smec t i t e (<0 .50 ) / ch lo r i t e in te r layer ing in sequences

s tudied to date, there is still no compe l l ing ev idence for l ong - r ange order ing o f SIC interstrat i f icat ions. The

images r eco rded here mus t be in terpre ted as r a n d o m in ter layer ing in v iew of the stat ist ical ins igni f icance of

the SC, SSC, CCS repet i t ions .

Severa l workers have sugges ted that cor rens i te has a un ique compos i t iona l r ange that differs f r o m the c o m b i n e d compos i t ion o f ch lor i te and smect i te layers

(Brigat t i and Poppi 1984; Inoue et al. 1984; Shau et

al. 1990; Inoue and Utada 1991). Shau et al. (1990) sugges t tha t the M g / ( M g + Fe) totals for smect i te , correns i te an d chlor i te decrease in that order. However ,

work by Sch i f fman and Staudige l (1995) shows sig-

nif icant over lap in the M g / ( M g + Fe) totals for these

Table 1. Representative electron microprobe analyses of chlorite and randomly mixed layered chlorite-smectite.

Chlorite Chlorite-Smectite (56 negative charge basis) (50 negative charge basis)

SiO2 29.28 28.98 29.16 31.31 28.71 32.63 29.67 A1203 13.70 14.09 14.15 13.08 13.76 12.58 13.66 FeOt 25.74 26.93 26.47 25.33 26.31 24.18 26.53 MgO 17.12 16.83 17.02 15.53 16.31 14.95 16.05 MnO 0.60 0.65 0.68 0.76 0.56 0.64 0.63 TiO 2 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.04 CaO 0.53 0.28 0.21 0.49 0.49 0.61 0.54 Na20 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.14 0.03 K20 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.87 0.09 1.26 0.07

Total 87.08 87.58 87.75 87.44 86.30 86.99 87.22 Si 6.26 6.18 6.20 5.94 5.55 6.17 5.67 ml iv 1.74 1.82 1.80 2.06 2.45 1.83 2.33 A1 vi 1.71 1.72 1.74 0.86 0.69 0.97 0.74 Fe 4.60 4.80 4.71 4.02 4.26 3.82 4.24 Mg 5.45 5.34 5.39 4.38 4.71 4.21 4.57 Mn 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.09 0.10 0.10 Ti 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.{30 0.00 Sum VI 11.87 11.98 11.96 9.39 9.75 9.10 9.65 Ca 0.12 0.06 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.11 Na 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.01 K 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.02 0.03 0.02 Sum IL 0.15 0.09 0.06 0.33 0.14 0.21 0.14 Cat Sum 20.02 20.07 20.02 17.72 17.89 17.31 17.79 Sum IL 19.87 19.98 19.96 17.39 1'7.75 17.10 17.65 Mg# 0.54 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.52 0.52 0.52

t Total iron reported as FeO.

Page 7: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

512 Bettison-Varga and Mackinnon Clays and Clay Minerals

18

17.5 -

17-

16.5 -

16

(A)

[ ] [ ]

t 'q

# [ ]

[ ] [ ]

I I I

e4 e,i

Total A1/25 oxygens

0.65

0.6

0.55 -

0.5

0.45

(B)

O O O

[]

| I

[] D []

eq

Si/25 oxygens

Figure 7. A) Noninterlayer cations Mg + Fe + A1 + Si versus total A1. B) Mg/(Mg + Fe) versus Si for phyllosilicates from 1A-25 calculated on the basis of 25 oxygens. Key: [] = groundmass replacement, (> = vesicle-filling.

3 phases, but, in particular, overlap for chlorite and corrensite compositions. In general, phyllosilicates from Point Sal show a slight increase in Mg/(Mg + Fe) totals with increase in nonexpandable layers (Bet- tison-Varga et al. 1991). This increase in Mg# with

decrease in expandable layers is inconsistent with the model by Shau et al. (1990), which necessitates a de- crease in Mg# with increasing chlorite percentages based on the unit-cell scale crystallographic modifi- cations that occur during the proposed transformation. The narrow range in Mg# for phyUosilicates in this study supports the contention that the host rock com- position dominates the exchange of Fe and Mg during phyllosilicate formation in the Point Sal sequence.

Electron microprobe analyses reported here show overlap with the totals of noninterlayer cations that one would expect for corrensite. Whereas the percent- age of smectite- and chlorite-like layers are predicted by the microprobe analyses (approximately 50:50 S/C, an accurate determination of the structure of the phase is not provided. In this study of metabasalts, there are 2 possible interpretations of the microprobe data: 1) either the probe data correspond to corrensite that has not been imaged or 2) analyses are of randomly inter- layered chlorite(0.5)/smectite which would be indistin- guishable from corrensite. This latter interpretation contradicts the suggestion that corrensite has a unique- ly constrained composition.

Transformation Processes

Recent studies suggest that the transformation of smectite to chlorite is not simply related to an increase in temperature during hydrothermal metamorphism. Instead, water/rock ratios and the mode of occurrence of phyllosilicates may be more important factors in controlling the structure of the stable layer silicate (Alt et al. 1986; Shau and Peacor 1992; Schiffman and Staudigel 1995). Observations from previous studies show that the transition may occur in a stepped pro- gression of smectite to chlorite via corrensite or as a gradual change involving randomly and regularly in- terlayered structures, as dictated by the environment of formation.

Assuming that the phases present are the result of alteration, the reaction mechanism would be found in the layer transition boundaries. Figure 8 shows 3 pos- sible mechanisms for the transition, 2 of which are based on models by Veblen and Ferry (1983) for the reaction of biotite to chlorite. The 1 st involves the for- mation of a brucite-like interlayer in the interlayer re- gion between the smectite-like layers. This reaction, causing an increase in volume, would result from pri- mary growth or replacement of the interlayer region of the smectitc. Terminations such as this have been found in a variety of phyllosilicates, including talc (Veblen and Buseck 1980, 1981; Veblen 1980). In the 2nd possible mechanism, the dissolution of tetrahedral sheets from smectite and conversion of the octahedral sheet to a brucite-like layer, involves an overall vol- ume decrease. Veblen and Ferry (1983) observed this consumption of mica layers in the alteration of biotite to chlorite.

Page 8: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

Vol. 45, No. 4, 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 513

Figure 8. Schematic representation of 3 mechanisms for the conversion of smectite to chlorite. Continuation of layers across defect boundaries are represented by the dashed lines. Mechanism 1. Growth of a brucite-like layer in the interlayer region between 2 T-O-T smectite layers resulting in volume increase. Mechanism 2. Dissolution of tetrahedral layers from T-O-T smectite layer to produce brucite-like layer resulting in volume decrease. Tetrahedral layers with pattern shown in mechanisms 1 and 2 would undergo significant modification during the reaction. Mechanism 3. Dissolution of T-O-T smectite layer and reprecipitation as T-O-T B T-O-T unit resulting in significant volume increase.

Veblen and Fer ry ' s (1983) 1st mechanism, as ap- pl ied to the transformation of smect i te to chlorite, would describe the growth of a brucite-l ike layer with- in the interlayer of a smecti te as shown in Figure 5. To approximate this reaction, a chlori te composi t ion f rom this study was chosen as the product phyllo- silicate. Pure saponite analyses for Point Sal samples have not been obtained, so the composi t ion o f smecti te was set using A1 and Si contents f rom Shau et al. (1990), while keeping the Mg/Fe ratio similar to that of the chlorite produced. In this study, data for mixed- layered chlori te(0.50)/smecti te and chlorite indicate that, with decreasing Si and increasing A1, the M g # slightly increases, al though it general ly remains con- stant due to the control of bulk rock chemist ry on phyllosi l icate composit ion. The Fe and M g distribution in the reaction would be control led by local availabil- ity f rom the surrounding host sample. The reaction is

written as 1 smecti te being transformed to 1 chlorite. For example:

Ca0.20(Mg1.46Fe1.34Alo.20)(Si3.40Alo.60 )O10 (OH)2 smectite

+ 6.16H20 + 1.06Fe +§ + 1.14Mg ++ + 1.20A1 +++

= (Mgz.rFe2.4Al~.0)(Si3.oAl~.0)O~o(OH)s chlorite

+ 0.04H4SIO4 + 0.20Ca +§ + 6.16H + [1]

The reaction progresses with addit ion of Fe ++, M g ++ and A1 §247247 whi le Si, Ca +§ and H § are released. Mod- ification of the tetrahedral layers on either side of the brucite-l ike layer would be necessary.

The 2nd mechan ism for the transformation may progress by the fol lowing reaction:

Page 9: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

514 Bettison-Varga and Mackinnon Clays and Clay Minerals

Cao.2(Mg146Fel.34Alo.20)(Si3.aoAlo.6)Olo(OH)2 smecfite

+ 0.20A1 §247247 + 4.60H20 + 0.4H §

= (Mgl.aFel.2A10.5)(Si1.5A10.5)O5 (OH)4 chlorite

+ 1.90H4SIO4 + 0.16Mg § + 0.14Fe §247

+ 0.20Ca [2]

This reaction would require the input of minor A13+ in an acidic environment and the loss of substantial Si, as 1 smectite unit is transformed to 0.5 chlorite crys- tals. In comparison with the 1st mechanism, the dis- solution of the tetrahedral layers of a smectite layer to form the bructite-like interlayer would require the re- lease of Fe and Mg in the phyllosilicate microenviron- ment in proportion to their abundance in the system and the release of substantial amounts of silica into solution. Modification of the tetrahedral layers on ei- ther side of the brucite layer would be necessary. Mechanism 1, on the other hand, would result in a much smaller loss of silica but necessitates input of Mg and Fe from the environment. No evidence for mechanism 2, such as brueite-like layer terminations within a T-O-T sequence with an associated volume decrease, has been found in this study.

The image in Figure 6 suggests a 3rd possible mechanism for the reaction of smectite to chlorite. This transformation involves a volume increase as one 10-.~, layer is transformed to a 10-/~ and 14-A unit (Figure 8). This reaction requires input of the elements necessary to form the chlorite-like layer, but would obviously result in significant structural modification of the original smectite layers. Addition of Fe and Mg in abundances controlled by the host rock composi- tion, along with the addition of OH, Si and A1, would be necessary for progress of this reaction. The steps involved in this transformation may be 1) dissolution of the smectite layer and 2) reprecipitation of those elements plus the additional materials as the chlorite layer. Meunier et al. (1991) and Shau et al. (1990) also suggest that dissolution and redistribution of elements within the microenvironment of the phyllosilicates produces corrensite and then chlorite.

Differences between Groundmass Replacement and Vesicle-Filling Phyllosilicates

Some studies have documented the variation of dis- crete phases (such as smectite or chlorite) and inter- layer structures with occurrence in temperature-depen- dent sequences or with inferred transformation pro- cesses. For example, Inoue (1985) presents a sequence with a high percentage of smectite layers (100-80%), corrensite (50-40% smectite layers) and chlorite (15- 0% smectite) and suggests that the lack of intermediate intercalated phases indicates that corrensite is a dis-

crete phase. Likewise, Schiffman and Staudigel (1995) report on the occurrence of smectite, smectite + cor- rensite, corrensite and chlorite + corrensite with in- creasing depth in samples from the La Palma sea- mount. However, a gradual transformation, with in- crease in the component of nonexpandable layers with depth, has been shown from a number of environ- ments, although commonly the lack of S/C with >50% smectite characterizes these sequences. The transition from smectite to chlorite in the Point Sal sequence appears to be accommodated in this gradual manner, as indicated by the presence of randomly interstratified C/S (Bettison and Schiffman 1988). Only 1 sample from Point Sal has R = 0 S/C with greater than 50% expandable layers. Liou et al. (1985) report the in- crease in percent chlorite layers with depth in the On- ikobe geothermal system. Their study supports the ex- istence of a compositional gap between smectite and 50:50 C/S. However, Schiffman and Fridleifsson (1991) also report a gradual transformation, without the compositional gap-suggested by the previous 2 studies, for phyllosilicates in the Nesjavellir geother- mal system in Iceland.

What factor(s) determine whether or not a sequence is characterized by discrete layer or interlayered phases? Schiffman and Staudigel (1995) argue that the pervasiveness of alteration in La Palma samples, in- dicated by the lack of relict igneous phases and high- variance mineral assemblages, supports a high water/ rock ratio attending the alteration. They suggest that it is this high integrated fluid flow that allows for the stabilization of the discrete layer phases. While differ- ences in pervasiveness of alteration may not be quan- tifiable, comparison between the Point Sal and La Pal- ma sequences suggest that fluid/rock ratios were prob- ably smaller in the alteration of the former than the latter (P. Schiffman, personal communication). This supports the suggestion by several workers (Alt et al. 1986; Shau and Peacor 1992; Schiffman and Staudigel 1995) that formation of randomly interlayered C/S would be favored in low fluid flux environments.

In this study, a notable difference exists between phyllosilicate phases in vesicles and groundmass of a basalt sample from the Point Sal ophiolite. Chlorite is the predominant vesicle phase, whereas randomly in- terlayered C/S characterizes groundmass replacements. Clearly, the mechanism of formation is different for the 2 occurrences: precipitation in voids versus trans- formation of a pre-existing phyllosilicate or silicate mineral. Shau and Peacor (1992) found a correlation between mixed-layered phases and mode of occur- rence as well, indicating that ill-defined packets of in- terlayered C/S occur as replacements of olivine or in- terstitial materials. Our results show that the thick packets of smectite-like and chlorite-like layer alter- nations are well defined. While the void phases are characterized by large, coherent crystals of chlorite

Page 10: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

Vol. 45, No. 4, 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 515

that precipitated from fluid flowing through these zones of permeability, the groundmass replacement of pre-existing material would progress at a slower rate with lower fluid/rock ratios.

Studies of the transformation of smectite to illite are far more advanced in their consideration of the mech- anism and the control of ordering than are studies of the smectite-to-chlorite conversion. Recent work by Huang et al. (1993) on the kinetics of the conversion resulted in the development of a simple rate law for conversion of smectite to illite. Their work indicates that temperature, time and K concentration are the most important factors controlling the conversion. Ab- ercrombie et al. (1994) suggest that reduction in silica activity as a result of quartz precipitation controls the smectite-to-illite reaction. They also note that in me- tabasalts the transition from corrensite to chlorite is accompanied by the precipitation of quartz. Similarly, the activity of Mg has been suggested to be an impor-

t an t factor in the development of corrensite by Velde (1977), as has the activity of A1 due to albitization of plagioclase (Shau and Peacor 1992). How can we dis- tinguish between controls of elemental availability and kinetic factors in the conversion of smectite to chlo- rite?

The existence of chlorite in the vesicles of the Point Sal metabasalt argues for progressive transformation of smectite in the groundmass to mixed-layered C/S and against the retrograde alteration of chlorite to C/S. As chlorite precipitates from solution, the transfor- mation progresses in the groundmass with less access to fluids, although presumably the activity of Mg would be similar in both microenvironments as shown by the narrow range in Mg# shown in Figure 7. Since Mg# is controlled by the bulk rock composition, the difference is most clearly related to 2 possible factors: the fluid/rock ratio and the time available for the for- mation or conversion process. Temperature would play a secondary role, since both the randomly interlayered phase and discrete chlorite can coexist.

CONCLUSIONS

The varying interstratifications in images shown here are consistent with structural disequilibrium be- tween chlorite, corrensite and smectite. That growth of the interstatifications occurred by modification of the original layer silicate is suggested by the similar mor- phology of the regions affected. The modification of smectite and inheritance of pre-existing structural units are supported by the TEM data. However, the majority of the observations argue for the dissolution of smec- tite and recrystallization of 10-/k and 14-A units with- in this sample.

The evidence from phyllosilicates in the ground- mass of Point Sat metabasalts suggests that, while any of the above transformation processes may take place, the intermediate step in the microenvironment of the

groundmass of these samples results in the formation of metastable mixed-layered C/S. Within the micro- environment of the pore space, chlorite precipitates. The bulk rock chemistry controls the Fe/Mg ratio of both the chlorite and mixed-layered C/S. However, the structure of the phase depends on the microenviron- ment of formation. Observations from the samples in this study support the suggestion by Aft et at. (1986), Shau and Peacor (1992) and Schiffman and Standigel (1995) that structural differences reflect the achieve- ment of textural equilibrium in zones of high perme- ability (chlorite in this case) and that randomly inter- layered SIC represents a metastable phase formed in the less-permeable glassy groundmass of the metabas- alts. The low water/rock ratios and less-pervasive al- teration are implied by the lack of albitization of the plagioclase in this sample. While chlorite formed from crystal growth in the pores of this metabasalt, random- ly mixed-layered C/S formed from dissolution/repre- cipitation events in the groundmass. Given the control of permeability on the phase formed, the use of mixed- layered C/S phases as geothermometers in variably al- tered basalts may be problematic.

The statistical significance of apparently ordered se- quences must be considered when addressing the ques- tion of whether or not a repeat sequence of smectite- like and chlorite-like layers can be adequately de- scribed as corrensite. What is the probability that 5 repetitions of SC will occur in a random distribution of 100 phyllosilicate layers? Are the arrangements of these layers the result of random mixing, or do ther- modynamic properties and/or reaction processes con- trol the sequence produced? Understanding the prob- ability of limited numbers of SC repetitions in a string of layers is necessary to answer the question of ran- dom versus regular ordering in phyllosilicate phases.

REFERENCES

Abercrombie HJ, Hutcheon IE, Bloch JD, de Caritat P. 1994. Silica activity and the smectite-illite reaction. Geology 22: 539-542.

Alt JC, Honnorez J, Laverne C, Emmermann R. 1986. Hy- drothermal alteration of a 1 km section through the upper oceanic crust, deep sea drilling project hole 504B: Miner- alogy, chemistry, and evolution of seawater-basalt interac- tions. J Geophys Res 91:10,309-10,335.

Banfield JS, Bailey W, Barker WW. 1994. Polysomatism, polytypism, defect microstructures, and reaction mecha- nisms in regulady and randomly interstratified serpentine and chlorite. Contrib Mineral Petrol 117:137-150.

Beaufort D, Meunier A. 1994. Saponite, corrensite, and chlo- rite-saponite mixed-layers in the Sancerre-Couy deep drill- hole (France). Clay Miner 29:47-61.

Bettison LA, Schiffman R 1988. Compositional and struc- tural variations of phyllosilicates from the Point Sal ophiol- ite, California. Am Mineral 73:62-76.

Bettison-Varga L, Mackinnon IDR, Schiffman R 1991. In- tegrated TEM, XRD, and electron microprobe investigation of mixed-layered chlorite-smectite from the Point Sal ophiolite, California. J Metamorphic Geol 9:697-710.

Page 11: THE ROLE OF RANDOMLY MIXED-LAYERED CHLORITE/SMECTITE … 45/45-4-506.pdf · CHLORITE/SMECTITE IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF ... 1997 Transformation of smectite to chlorite 507 ... effects

516 Bettison-Varga and Mackinnon Clays and Clay Minerals

Bevins RE, Robinson D, Rowbotham G. 1991. Composi- tional variations in mafic phyllosilicates from regional low- grade metabasites and application of the chlorite geother- mometer. J Metamorphic Geol 9:711-721.

Brigatti, ME Poppi L. 1984. Crystal chemistry of corrensite: A review. Clays Clay Miner 32:391-399.

Chang HK, Mackenzie FT, Schoonmaker J. 1986. Compar- isons between the diagenesis of dioctahedral and triocta- hedral smectite, Brazilian offshore basins. Clays Clay Min- er 34:407-423.

Cowley J, Moodie AE 1957. The scattering of electrons by atoms and crystals. I. A new theoretical approach, Acta Crystallogr 10:609-619.

Gallahan WE, Duncan RA. 1994. Spatial and temporal vari- ability in crystallization of celadonites within the Troodos ophiolite, Cyprus: Implications for low-temperature alter- ation of the oceanic crust. J Geophys Res 99:3147-3161.

Guthrie GD, Veblen DR. 1989. High resolution transmission electron microscopy of mixed-layer illite/smectite: Com- puter simulations. Clays Clay Miner 37:1-11.

Helmhold KE, van der Kamp E 1984. Diagenetic mineralogy and controls on albitization and laumontite formation in Palaeogene arkoses, Santa Ynez Mountains, California. In: McDonald DA, Surdam RC, editors. Clastic diagenesis. Am Assoc Petrol Geol Mere 37:239-276.

Hoffman J, Hower J. 1979. Clay mineral assemblages as low grade metamorphic geothermometers: Application to the thrust faulted disturbed belt of Montana, USA. In: Scholle PA, Schluger PR, editors. Aspects of diagenesis. Soc Econ Paleontol Mineral Spec Publ 26:55-79.

Hopson CA, Frano CJ, Pessagno Jr. EA, Mattinson JM. 1975. Preliminary report and geologic guide to the Jurassic ophiolite near Point Sal, southern California Coast. Geol Soc Am Cordilleran Sec Guidebook to Field Trip No. 5. 36 p.

Horton DG. 1985. Mixed-layer illite/smectite as a paleotem- perature indicator in the Amethyst vein system, Creed dis- trict, Colorado, USA. Contrib Mineral Petrol 91:171-179.

Huang W-L, Longo JM, Pevear DR. 1993. An experimen- tally derived kinetic model for smectite-to-illite conversion and its use as a geothermometer. Clays Clay Miner 41:162- 177.

Inoue A. 1985. Chemistry of corrensite: A trend in compo- sition of trioctahedral chlorite/smecfite during diagenesis. J Coil Arts Sci, Chiba Univ B-18:69-82.

Inoue A. 1987. Conversion of smectite to chlorite by hydro- thermal and diagenetic alterations, Hokuroku Kuroko min- eralization area, northeast Japan. In: Schultz LG, van Ophen H, Mumpton FA, editors. Proc Int Clay Conf; 1985; Denver, CO. Bloomington, IN: Clay Miner Soc. p 158-164.

Inoue A, Utada M. 1991. Smectite-to-chlorite transformation in thermally metamorphosed volcanoclastic rocks in the Kamikita area, northern Honshu, Japan. Am Miner 76:628- 640.

Inoue AM, Utada M, Negata H, Watanabe T. 1984. Conver- sion of trioctahedral smectite to interstratified chlorite/ smectite in Pliocene acidic pyroclastic sediments of the

Ohyu district, Akita Prefecture, Japan. Clay Sci Soc Jpn 6: 103-116.

Jiang W-T, Peacor D. 1994. Prograde transitions of corrensite and chlorite in low-grade pelitic rocks from the Gaspe Pen- insula, Quebec. Clays Clay Miner 42:497-517.

Liou JG, Seki Y, Guillemette RN, Sakal, H. 1985. Compo- sitions and parageneses of secondary minerals in the Oni- kobe geothermal system, Japan. Chem Geol 49:1-20.

Meunier A, Inoue A, Beaufort D. 1991. Chemiographic anal- ysis of trioctahedral smectite-to-chlorite conversion series from the Ohyu Caldera, Japan. Clays Clay Miner 39:409- 415.

Reynolds RC Jr. 1985. NEWMOD�9 A computer program for the calculation of one-dimensional diffraction patterns of mixed-layered clays. Hanover, NH: RC Reynolds, Jr, 8 Brook Rd.

Roberson HE. 1988. Random mixed-layer chlorite-smectite: Does it exist? [abstract]. 25th Clay Miner Soc Annu Meet; Grand Rapids, MI. p 98.

Roberson HE. 1989. Corrensite in hydrotbernaally altered oceanic rocks [abstract]. 26th Clay Miner Soc Annu Meet; Sacramento, CA. p 59.

Scbiffman P, Bettison LA, Williams A. 1986. Hydrothermal metamorphism of the Point Sal remnant, California Coast Range ophiolite. Proc 5th Int Syrup on Water-Rock Inter- actions, p 489-492.

Schiffman P, Fridleifsson GO. 1991. The smectite-chlorite transition in drillhole NJ-15, Nesjavellir geothermal field, Iceland: XRD, BSE, and electron microprobe investiga- tions. J Metamorphic Geol 9:679-696.

Scbiffman P, Staudigel H. 1995. The smectite to chlorite transition in a fossil seamount hydrothermal system: The basement complex of La Palma, Canary Islands. J Meta- morphic Geol 13:487-498.

Shau Y-H, Peacor D. 1992. Phyllosilicates in hydrothermally altered basalts from DSDP hole 504B, leg 83-A TEM and AEM study. Contrib Mineral Petrol 112:119-133.

Shau Y-H, Peacor D, Essene E. 1990. Corrensite and mixed- layer chlorite/corrensite in metabasalt from northern Tai- wan: TEM/AEM, EPMA, XRD, and optical studies. Con- trib Mineral Petrol 105:123-142.

Stadelmann P. 1991. Simulation of HREM images and 2D CBED patterns using EMS software package. Software manual 12M-EPFI. Lausanne, Switzerland.

Veblen DR. 1980. Anthophyllite asbestos: Microstructures, intergrown sheet silicates, and mechanisms of fiber for- mation. Am Mineral 65:1075-1086.

Veblen DR, Buseck PR. 1980. Microstruetures and reaction mechanisms in biopyriboles. Am Mineral 65:599-623.

Veblen DR, Buseck PR. 1981. Hydrous pyriboles and sheet silicates in pyroxenes and uralites: Intergrowth, microstruc- tures and reaction mechanisms. Am Mineral 66:1107-1134.

Veblen DR, Ferry JM. 1983. A TEM study of the biotite- chlorite reaction and comparison with petrologic observa- tions. Am Mineral 68:1160-1168.

Velde B. 1977. Clays and clay minerals in natural and syn- thetic systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 365 p.

(Received 27 September 1995; accepted 15 September 1996; Ms. 2694)


Recommended