Date post: | 21-Jun-2015 |
Category: |
Health & Medicine |
Upload: | pathogenes |
View: | 6,683 times |
Download: | 0 times |
SAG 6 associates host specific cytokine IL6 signaling pathways to the pathogenesis of disease. The focus
of EPM research should be inflammation.
Thank you: Ellis Greiner, Mike Grigg, Jared Wendte, Tom Kennedy, David Lindsay
Siobhan P. Ellison DVM PhD
• SnSAG6 was lethal for sea otters in California. Shellfish, contaminated with S. neurona are responsible for the infections .
Cutler showed that S. falcatula does not infect horses. Immunoconversion was not detected using a 17 kDa protein on SN immunoblots.
Marsh shows that horses with EPM produce antibodies against S. falcatula. Marsh indicates that SN and SF are likely multiple related species (that may infect different IH).
Howe/Zang showed that a 17 protein is expressed by virulent SN and does not differentiate between SN and SF.
37R experiments, Trojan horse model, and Levamisole HCl implicate clinical signs to the functional WBC
A BLAST analysis of equine IL6 signaling proteins show low level homology with SAG 1/5 (host specific) and SAG 3, microneme, and enolase (non-host specific) proteins.
LEVAMISOLE HCL down regulates IL6
Experiments that relate IL6 to S. neurona
Clinical signs of EPM abate with levamisole treatment. Parasite proteins may function in equine inflammatory IL6 signaling pathways to cause disease.
Day 1
Day 10
IL 6 classic signaling is anti-inflammatory and trans-signaling is proinflammatory. IL6 is species specific gp 130 is not.
• IL6 binds IL-6R to activate gp130• IL-6R
• Cognate receptor subunit found on liver and some leukocytes (neutrophils)
• IL-6R/IL 6• Formed on cognate cells to activate gp130 locally• anti-inflammatory, regenerative
• Trans-signaling: sIL-6R/IL-6 activates gp130• Expression of gp130 is ubiquitous• Binds gp130 via trans-signaling on many cells• sIL-6R/IL-6 crosses BBB• pro-inflammatory
gp130
IL6-R
IL6
IL6
SIL6-R
ANTI-INFLAMMATORY
PRO-INFLAMMATORY
SnSAG 6 and SfSAG 6 are almost identical, only the horse and high level sequencing of 33 markers differentiates the organisms.
SF SAG 6 strain does not express SAG 4
Score494 bits(1271) Expect5e-174 MethodCompositional matrix adjust. Identities259/283(92%) Positives267/283(94%) Gaps2/283(0%)
SnSAG6 1
SfSAG6 1
MTRAVLLTILLTLCSARVSLVKAANPRQATCANGQKTATKVENPGALQLVCPQQYQLNPAMTRAVLLT+LLTLCSARVSLVKAA+PRQATC NGQKTATKVENPGALQ+VCPQQYQLNP MTRAVLLTLLLTLCSARVSLVKAAHPRQATCVNGQKTATKVENPGALQVVCPQQYQLNPP
60
60
SnSAG6 61
SfSAG6 61
PANDAAGDMQVFGTEAADNAVALRGVLPAATYINANGATTLTVPQLPPKPVSVFIQCRQA ANDAAG+MQVFGTEAADN VAL+GVLPAATYINA+ A TLTVPQLPPKPVSVFIQCRQAAANDAAGNMQVFGTEAADNPVALQGVLPAATYINADDAVTLTVPQLPPKPVSVFIQCRQA
120
120
SnSAG6 121
SfSAG6 121
AQGAQQAGQCIIEVQVAGSPRLGLGPNTCAAQQSRIDFEIKAANEAAVFSCGAGLALLQQ QGAQQAGQCIIEVQVAGSPRLG PNTCAAQQSRIDFEI A NEAAVFSCGAGLAL+QQRQGAQQAGQCIIEVQVAGSPRLG-- PNTCAAQQSRIDFEITAGNEAAVFSCGAGLALVQQ
180
178
SnSAG6 181
SfSAG6 179
ASDDTCSKDQALPSGVALAAKEAGAVQLAFPQLPQNPLKICYICTPNGQRAEAAQRCEIHA DDTCSK+ QALPSGVA A KE GAVQL FPQLPQNPLKICYICTPNGQRAE AAQRCEIHALDDTCSKE QALPSGVASAQKEGGAVQLGFPQLPQNPLKICYICTPNGQRAEAAQRCEIH
240
238
SnSAG6 241
SfSAG6 239
VTVAGSGDGGNPGPTGAAPVGPAARSASALVLAVVAAGFFHFWVTVAGSGDGGNPGPTGAAPVGPAARSASALVLAVVAAGFFHFWVTVAGSGDGGNPGPTGAAPVGPAARSASALVLAVVAAGFFHFW
283
281
SAG 6
Genetic analysisGrigg showed that the S. molothrusdidelphis (falcatula) isolated from a bird was the Sf SAG 6 strain.
The Cutler experiment used bird intermediate host selectivity to show SF SAG 6 does not infect horses
A classic example of IH host selectivity: An immune deficient mouse selects SN while the budgie select SF. Biological assays are an important adjunct to sequence analysis, this experiment clarified that SN was not SF as suggested by some
sequence data.
*
*Mansfield may have shown cowbird hosts SN and SF
S. molothrusdidelphis (falcatula) did not cause clinical signs or induce antibodies against a 17 kDa protein of S. neurona in horses.
• One horse developed clinical signs due to sarcocystiasis (that was attributed to pre-experiment exposure based on antibody in serum and CSF against S. neurona).
• On WB: The ‘diagnostic’ protein was a 17kDa (low molecular weight) S. neurona antigen. Results suggest SF won’t cross react on SN immunoblots.
S. molothrusdidelphis S. neurona
SAG 1
SAG 5
SAG 4/3
SAG 2 WB
IFAT CSF SAG 4
AG3
Marsh showed that horses with EPM produce antibodies to SF (1), SF strains differ in protein expression (2), and antibody against SF detects
SN 17 kDa antigens by immunoblot (3).
*
*SAG 1 sera
SF Mu1
SAG minus sera
*Mu1 UCD1 Fl
α SN
α SF *
S. falcatula
αSN
α SF
SN
1.
2.
3.
Zhang (2008) determined that S. neurona SnSPR1, a 17 kDa protein can not distinguish SN and SF. Horses aren’t infected with falcatula therefore
anti-SAG 6 antibody is detected in horses are from neurona infections
The asexual stage of Sarcocystis found in the CNS of horses was named S. neurona with no knowledge of the hosts that transmitted the parasite.
Cutler, Marsh, Howe, Zhang demonstrate that it is necessary to distinguish between SF and SN to interpret the role of SAG 6.
SN SAG 6 can be detected in horse sera therefore SnSAG 6 infects horses
Is S. dasydidelphis the true S. neurona?
S. falcatula and S. neurona maybe more accurately understood as a group of closely related species
• Lost to antiquity is the origin of the name S. falcatula and the type specimen that could be used for genotyping.
“Although S. falcatula Stiles, 1893 was named as a parasite maintained through transmission among birds and opossums over 100 years ago, recent molecular evidence indicates that isolates designated as ‘S. falcatula may be more accurately understood as an assemblage of related species” (Dubey 2006).
• Based on the biology of Sarcocystis we can anticipate that S. falcatula strains will • express different, possibly mutually exclusive, surface antigens • relate to intermediate host specificity• S. falcatula avian parasite and won’t infect horses
Howe (2008) showed all SN tested express a 17 kDa, SnSAG2, antigen (1), the 37R strain is a mixed infection (2), and Gautam (2011) showed that SN SAGs show stage related
expression (3).
Howe 2008, Figure 3 left, and Table 1 footnote below, indicated that Sn-37R is a mixed infection
o 37R SN138 is a SAG 1 minus strain (sporocyst)o 37R SN744 is a SAG 1 strain (merozoite from a horse)
1. 2.
3.Strain Stage
A functional WBC is needed for clinical signs of EPM, shown by SN 37R strain infections in SCID (1) vs immunocompetent (2) foals.
Only the SAG 1 merozoites invaded the CNS (2) indicating the horse may show a parasite bias
Sporocyst SN 37-R 138* (SAG minus) Parasitemia and no clinical signs
Merozoite SN 37-R 744 (SAG 1) Parasitemia and no clinical signs
Sporocyst SN 37-R 138* (SAG minus) No parasites in CNS, Clinical signs
Merozoite SN 37-R 744 (SAG 1) Short lived parasitemia, Neuroinvasion, clinical signs
1.
2.
Strain Stage WBC
37 R strain infections, the Trojan Horse model, and levamisole HCl implicate the functional leukocyte in EPM
• 37R experiments show that WBC needs to be functional for clinical signs and neuro-invasion by the SAG 1 strain. The SAG 1-minus strain didn’t invade the CNS.
• Trojan horse model depends on functional leukocytes• S. neurona (SAG 1) infected leukocytes can deliver parasites into CNS• S. neurona (SAG 1) infected leukocytes produce clinical signs (neuroinflammation)
• Levamisole alleviates inflammation associated with clinical signs • Levamisole can block signs due to challenge (Ellison, unpublished)• Levamisole receptors are present on WBC and on Sarcocystis neurona• In humans and mice levamisole affects cytokine pathways: IL6 is down regulated
• Is there a relationship between virulent S. neurona strains and IL 6?• Equine virulent strains are SAG 1 and SAG 5
Strain Stage WBC
EPM is a biphasic disease. Acutely, strain specific down regulation of IFNγ may allow neuroinvasion. Antibody mediated,
proinflammatory pathways may characterize chronic disease
SN SAG 6 SF SAG 6 SN SAG 1, 5Immunoconversion in horses No immunoconversion in horses Immunoconversion in horses
No neuroinvasion No neuroinvasion NeuroinvasionClinical signs No clinical signs Clinical signs
0 DPC
3 DPC
4 DPC 12 DPC
17 DPC
0
50
100
150
Titer
3
4
5
6
9
10
PMA/I suppression
A mechanism for S. neurona strain virulence was identified by low homology between IL6-IL6r-gp130 and S. neurona SAG’s
SnSAG’s suggest neurovirulence in horses by SAG 1 and 5 strains but not SAG 6 via species specific IL6
SAG 1 and SAG 5, proteins or antibodies that bind them, may interact with equine IL6 pathways. S. neurona SAG 1 and 5 do not have cytokine structure.
* IL6 is species specific therefore this proposed mechanism would confer host cell selectivity by Sarcocystis
Levamisole and its effects on IL6 are well studied. Levamisole receptors on protozoa have been identified.
SnSAG1 SnSAG5 SnSAG2 SnSAG3 SnSAG4 SnSAG6 Microneme enolase
NCBI # ABW82530.1 ABD47681.1 AAO38736.1 AAO38737.1 AAO38738.1 ADG26773.1 AAM95973 AAV80211
Equine IL6 AAB62246.1 44% 35% -- -- -- -- 38%Opossum protein -- -- 100% -- 100% 100%gp130 AEB61458.1 -- -- -- 25% -- --
Eq IL6R XP_005610133 -- 63%
Clinically and experimentally parasites are not always found in the CNS. Dose is related to signs, not parasites.
Intermediate host specificity suggested in CNS disease
IL6 is species specific while gp 130 is not.
Acute (neuroinvasion) disease may require homologs that bind host IL6 receptors. Chronic (neuroinflammation) disease may involve antibody binding of non-species specific gp 130, via IL6 trans-signaling pathways at the blood/CSF barrier.
gp130
IL6-R
IL6
IL6
SIL6-R
ANTI-INFLAMMATORY
PRO-INFLAMMATORY
SAG 6The SAG 6 phenotype may be used implicate virulence factor’s for an IH:• SAG 1 and 5 show homology with equine specific IL6• SAG 1/5 merozoites may down regulate protective IFNɣ
SAG 6 may be the exception that proves the rule:• CNS invasion may require IL6 similarity • Clinical signs of EPM involves anti-SAG 1,5,6 to gp 130
Propose that pathogenesis of disease in a horse • Acute EPM involves stage related SAG’s 1 and 5• Chronic disease involves anti-SAG 1,5,6 • Other stimuli of neurotropic cytokines also show single protein IL6
homology: Borellia and EHV• Look for genetic predisposition to EPM by heredity of IL6r proteins
Possibly, host cytokines are managed by stage related, expressed proteins (SAG’s) that favor infection. Inflammation is induced by antibodies produced against immunodominant SAG’s that, in turn, react with host proteins.
Loop Trail 20 years
Pathogenes PathInflammation
QUESTIONS?
For further discussions meet Siobhan tonight at the clam bar!
SAG 6 has homology with human IL6
First 72 hours Antibody production day 17
gp130
IL6-R
IL6
sIL6-R
C-reactive protein
gp130
IL6
sIL6-R
IL6
Acute Disease Chronic DiseaseSN microneme
SN SAG 1, 5SN enolase
IFNγ
SN SAG 3
IL6
Parasite invasion α SAG 1, 5, 6
Parasite clearance
IL6