The Second Amendment (Gun Rights)

8/14/2019 The Second Amendment (Gun Rights)

1/26

The Second Amendment

We Need Government Control Not Gun Control

Tyrants have always loathed an armed people. History shows this from theses sources:

This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Ourstreets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead. (ChancelorsSpeech, 1935 by Adolf Hitler)

The most foolish mistake we could make would be to allow the subject peoples to possessarms. So lets not have any talk about native militas. (Hitlers Secret Conversations, 1941-44,Farrar, Strauss and Young, 1953)

All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all theguns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party. (by Mao Zedong in theProblems of War and Strategy, Nov 6 1938, published in Selected Works of Mao Zedong, 1965)

US Senator, If I could have banned them all- Mr. And Mrs. America turn in your guns I

would have! (Statement on TV program 69 Minutes, Feb 5 1995 by CFR California U.S. SenatorDiane Feinstein)

(US President, has sworn an oath to defend the US Constitution, (not to violate it, criticize it, andbelittle it)) When we got organized as a country, [and] wrote a fairly radical Constitution, with aradical Bill of Rights, giving radical amounts of freedom to Americans, it was assumed thatAmericans who had that freedom would use it responsiblyWhen personal freedom is beingabused, you have to move to limit it. (April 19 1994, on MTV by ex-President Bill Clinton)Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA ordinary citizens dont need


2/26

guns, as their having guns DOESNT SERVE THE STATE. HEINRICH HIMMLER

All military-type firearms are to be handed in immediatelyThe SS, SA and Stahlhelm giveevery respectable German man the opportunity of campaigning with them. Therefore anyone whodoes not belong to one of the above-named organizations and who unjustifiably neverthelessKEEPS his weaponmust be regarded as an ENEMY OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT. SA OBERFUHRER OF BAD TOLZ (3/33)

"The measures adopted to restore public order are: First of all the elimination of the so-calledsubversive elements.... They were elements of disorder and subversion. On the morrow ofeach conflict I gave the categorical order to confiscate the largest possible number ofweapons of every sort and kind. This confiscation, which continues with the utmost energy,has given satisfactory results." (By Italys Fascist ruler, Prime Minister Benito Mussolini, in aspeech delivered at the Italian Senate on June 8, 1923)

Regardless of many peoples denials, there are certain groups in America who want to ban allprivate ownership of firearms, which is grossly unconstitutional. These groups arent liberal orconservative, but extremist since both the left and the right all hold dear the 2nd Amendment withonly different interpretations of it obviously.

Heres one source on it, which involves the CIA on it [the Gestapo plot to ban all handguns]: Aprinciple player in the 1974 foundings of both HCI [then called the Nation al Council to ControlHandguns] and the NCBH [National Coalition to Ban Handguns, now renamed the CoalitionAgainst Gun Violence] was Ed Wells, who was A 25-YEAR VETERAN OF THE COVERTOPERATIONS DIVISION OF THE CIA There was also a fund raiser for NCBH hosted by theman Nixon appointed as CIA Director, William Colby HCI spokesman Greg Risch incredibly admitted that SURE THERE ARE A LOT OF CIA PEOPLE IN IT [HCI], and also stated thatthere are quite a few EX-CIA WHO DONATE TO US. David Emorys Talk Radio (On NAZIs)

Heres Janet Renos take on gun control: Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only astep. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal.

The Bible Issue and Guns:

Many Christians believe over the decades that disarmament (or pacifism. Pacifism means do noresistance whatsoever in response. That means even if your kid or family member is beingassaulted, you do nothing about it. Pacifism would ban the police since the police uses violenceto stop violent situations at time) is biblical. Some even believe that total blind allegiance to thegovernment is great even saying that evil government is of God. The spin stops here and the truthmust be presented. The Bible always supported self-defense. In the OT, the Hebrews not only wentto battle and conquered their enemies, but they did so at the command of God and went with hisblessings as in Deut. Chapter 20. Pacifists use Exodus 20:13 to dispute self-defense and arms use,

but in Ex. 20:13 kill means from the original Hebrew word ratsach meaning premeditatedmurder not self-defense using arms if necessary. The OT like 1 Samuel 13:9-22, etc. outline selfdefense concepts. The Bible supports the self-defense of men and women will defend themselvesagainst someone intent on harming them. Weapons used in the right manner for a just cause arenever evil. There is nothing wrong with pacifism or non-violence per se, but we are not forbidden toprotecting ourselves or families at all.

There are no admonitions not to carry weapons in the Bible. In the OT, men carried swords, bows,and arrows, spears, or whatever freely and without restrictions as long as the nation remained underits own sovereignty. Weapons were utilized to hunt not only for self defense. Only when Israel was


3/26

taken over by enemy nations were the people forced to give up weapons. Now we must go on to theNT to Jesus Christ. Many pacifists think that Christ never used any self-defense and refused to takeany forceful actions on his own? This lie is exposed and refuted. Christ was meek in the NT, butGod who is Christ is a being of Love and Justice. Sometimes justice requires force and Christdrove people breaking Jewish laws from the temple in Jerusalem and risked his life publiclyand vocally where things needed to be changed among corrupt religious and governmental

leaders. During this time, the Roman government banned weapons except for special Jewishpolice groups charged with enforcing the law and an occupying army.

But, many Jews disobey the government rule by often having short swords or daggers concealed ontheir persons and even the Lord Jesus Christ tells his disciples on one occasion: Then said heunto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he hathno sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. (Luke 22:36) (This is the verse thatpacifists forgotten) Later, in the NT Bible, Jesus told the disciples that they could get a sword ifthey want to. Jesus, who was facing death shortly never, said that having weapons is a sin. Christ inhis 2nd coming will judge, and breaks his enemies with a rod of iron and sword in his mouth. AfterJesus Christs coming, we wouldnt need weapons since it will be filled with peace. The NT inHebrew 13:17 teaches that Christians should obey the laws of the land they are in, provided thelaws arent immoral according to the Biblical principles or compromise your religion beliefs or moralconscience. In other words, if they government says do abortion or murder innocent people,you have a right not to do that. Daniel 3 and 6 outline Daniel and his three friends disobeyedNebuchadnezzars command that everyone should bow and worship the pagan image on the plainof Dura. They refused and were thrown in the furnace for punishment, they trusted themselves toGod and he delivered them. This supports self-defense along with the Constitution. The verse inEphesians saying not to use carnal weapons is true, but it inheritably doesnt condemn self-defenseat all. In other words, we shouldnt fight people preemptively or fight (in the government in arebellious type way) to establish a man made Kingdom of God on Earth. Yet, we have every right toprotect our family and friends if they are in immediate danger. As always, violence is forbidden byany Christian. As Dr. Martin Luther King rightfully said, non-violent-resistance should always be agoal in solving problems, but self-defense is always another option if circumstances lead to that.This doesnt mean you have to own a gun. This does mean that people have a right to own a gun ifthey want to. Also, guns have been used for sport and other uses not just shooting in self defense atall. I do respect Christians who follow non-resistance though.

Basic Historical Precedents to Promote Self-Defense and Gun Rights

The following comes from www.jpfo.org/sixaboutsecond.htm-

1). The Holy Bible in the OT supports self-defense in Exodus 22:2.

2). The Talmud states (I dont agree with Talmud on every issue though) that: If someone comesto kill you, arise quickly and kill him. (Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin. 1994, 2, 72a; The BabylonianTalmud: Tractate Berakoth. 1990, 58a, 62b).

3). Cicero, Romes leading orator, had early argued that the right to self-defense was natural andinborn, and not a creation of the government. The right to use weapons was a necessary part ofthe right to self-defense any view to the contrary was silly nonsense. [Stephen P. Halbrook,That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of A Constitutional Right (1984), p. 17, fn 76-77.]

4). Roman Catholic Doctrine: Christian doctrine has long asserted the right and duty of selfdefense. Someone who defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal hisaggressor a lethal blow. See Catechism of the Catholic Church 1994, sections 2263-65 (citingand quoting Thomas Aquinas). I dont agree with Roman Catholic doctrine. This is an example.


4/26

5). Protestant Doctrine: Individual has personal and unalienable right to self-defense, evenagainst government. Samuel Rutherford, Lex, Rex [1644] 1982, pp. 159-166, 183-185 (SprinklePublications edition.) Jesus advised his disciples to arm themselves in view of likely persecution.Luke 22:36.

6). John Lockes Second Treatise of Government (1690) aimed at reforming Britains monarchyand parliamentary system and limiting the power of government, and profoundly influenced theFounders and all Western Civilization. John Locke explained that civil government properly existsto more effectively protect the rights that all individuals have in the state of nature.

The individuals have the rights to life, liberty, and property. They give civil government the powerover themselves only to the extent that it better protects those rights. Thomas Jefferson, author ofthe Declaration of Independence, specifically declared that the ideas of John Lockes SecondTreatise were generally approved by the citizens of the United States. Jefferson mandated thatLockes Second Treatise be taught in the University of Virginia. (end of website source)

*For any major nation in history especially the 20th century that had gun control and banned allfirearms for the citizen to acquire, extermination, genocide, and bad effects will always proceed.Look at these results.

+In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, approximately 20 milliondissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.+In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable todefend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.+In 1928, Germany established gun control. From 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies,homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves, were roundedup and exterminated.+In 1935, China established gun control. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents wereunable to defend themselves and were rounded up and exterminated.+In 1964, Guatemala established gun control. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians,unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.+In 1970, Uganda established gun control. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable todefend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

+In 1956, Cambodia established gun control. From 1975 to 1977, one million "educated" people,unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.That places total victims who lost their lives at the hands of their own governments because ofgun control at approximately 56 million in the last century.

*Over the last 10 years, law-abiding citizens have been stripped of their right to own someor all types of firearms in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and New Zealand among others.The USA is next on the list, but it will be more harder and with more bloodshed to enforce a banof the private ownership of handguns since the U.S.A. has the 2nd Amendment. This is one of thepure goals of the globalist/occult-influenced United Nations. To prevent one of self-defenseagainst tyrants is always a routine used by these globalists to achieve the plot of the one-worldgovernment. Gun Control doesnt work since constant weapons constraints aimed at law-abidingcitizens or against the 2nd Amendment with no end in sight or definite extent will lead to

confiscation of legal firearms.

This always the case in that scenario without any question. The right of self-defense is a God-givenright. If changes dont occur, within the next 10-20 years in America, all guns might bebanned and that policy will be enforced by the Gestapo U.N./BATF agents utilized in theLand of the Free and the Home of the Brave.


5/26

What did the Founding Fathers Think About Gun Control?

These people werent perfect on all issues, but it seems that they are on pointinvolving this circumstance. There are so many quotes of these people supportinggun rights making proof of the 2nd Amendments principle rights outlined thatonly the desperate, lying individuals will deny these quotes. Here they are:

1). Laws that forbid the carrying of armsdisarm only those who are neitherinclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for theassaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than toprevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." (Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria inOn Crimes and punishment (1764)).

2). "Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserveorder in the world as well as property . . . Horrid mischief would ensue were the

law-abiding deprived of the use of them." Thomas Paine, Thoughts on DefensiveWar (1775).

3). "The right of the people to keep and bear...arms shall not be infringed. A wellregulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the bestand most natural defense of a free country..." (James Madison, I Annals ofCongress 434, 6-8-1789)


6/26

4). "The said Constitution be never construed to prevent the people of theUnited States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." (SamuelAdams, during Massachusetts's Convention to Ratify the Constitution (1788)).

5). "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizensof other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."(James Madison, The Federalist Papers No. 46 at 243-244.)

6). "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are inalmost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforceunjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, andconstitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on anypretense, raised in the United States"(Noah Webster in "An Examination intothe Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed.,

Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888).)

7). "A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves and includeall men capable of bearing arms To preserve liberty it is essential that thewhole body of people always possess arms . . . " Richard Henry Lee, AdditionalLetters From the Federal Farmer 53 (1788).

8). "...a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms,is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of thepeople to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed ... - Constitution of Virginia,Article 1, Bill of Rights, Section 13.

9). "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people isthe best and most effectual way to enslave them." (George Mason, duringVirginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution (1788).)

10). The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword,because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior toany band of regular troops." (Noah Webster, An Examination into the LeadingPrinciples of the Federal Constitution Proposed BV the Late Convention (1787).)

11). "To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion,except in private self-defense or by partial orders of towns...is a dissolution of thegovernment." (John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of theUnited States of America (1787-1788).)

More quotes can be found at www.thejackal.freeservers.com/about.html


7/26

and www.vtgunsmiths.com/arms/ffquote.html

*The Constitution and many founding fathers supported the militias ascomposed of men and women voluntarily holding arms. Holding any arms

therefore is very legal and anyone advocating the ban of them is not onlyunconstitutional, but also morally wrong. The Founding Fathers classified theserights as individual rights not collective or rights only for a few militias. Onesupporter of gun control was Adolph Hitler who banned all arms in his ThirdReich (except for a chosen few). George W. Bush once supported a ban on all semi-automatic shotguns. It didnt occur thankfully. The liar Nixon and Reagan wereardent gun-control people as well. Dictators Mao Tse Tung and Joseph Stalin alsoenforced gun bans. Today in 2009, Barack Obama has anti-gun tendencies despitehim talking about the Second Amendment being about an individual right ofcitizens to own a firearm.

Real Gun Statistics

Doctors vs. Guns U.S. Statistics:

Number of physicians in the US = 700,000

Accidental deaths caused by physician s per year =120,000

Accidental deaths per physician = 0.171 (U.S. Dept. of Health &

Human Services)

Number of gun owners in the US = 80,000,000

Number of accidental gun deaths per year (all age groups) =1,500

Accidental deaths per gun owner = 0.0000188 (U.S. Bureau ofAlcohol, Tobacco & Firearms)

Therefore, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous

than gun owners.

ACCIDENTAL DEATHS

Fact: Firearm misuse causes only a small number of accidental deaths in the U.S. (107)

For

example, compared to accidental death from firearms, you are:

Twice as likely to suffocate on a swallowed object

Seven times more likely to be poisoned

10 times more likely to die falling And 31 times more likely to die in an automobile accident

Fact: In 1996, there were only 21 accidental gun deaths for children under age 15. About

twice as many children under the age of ten die from drowning in bathtubs. (108)

Fact: In 1993, there were 1,334 drownings and 528 firearm-related accidental deaths from

ages 0-19. Firearms outnumber pools by a factor of over 30:1. Thus, the risk of drowning

in a pool is nearly 100 times higher than from a firearm-related accident for everyone,

and nearly 500 times for ages 0-5. (109)


8/26

Sources:

107 National Safety Council's 1997 Accident Fact Book

108 Centers for Disease Control

109 National Center for Health Statistics, and the National Spa and Pool Institute.

Behold these quick facts:

1). Assault Weapons arent a serious problem in America since according to Gary

Kluecks Targeting Guns in 1997, a complication of 48 metropolitan police department

from 1980-1994, shown that assault weapons were used in less than 2% of crimes

involving in firearms and 0.25% of all violent crime. (All before the enactment of any

national or state assault weapons ban). In 1998, at LA, out of the 538 documented gun

incidents, only (0.2%) involved an assault weapon. In SF at 1998, only 2.2% ofconfiscated weapons were assault weapons.

2). Gun banning even in the UK increased crime. According to the British Home Office,

reported by the BBC News, July 12, 2002 presented that street robberies soared 28% in

2001. Violent crime is up 11%, murders up 4%, and rapes up 14%. Even homicide rates

are on an all time high in 2000 after a virtual ban on private handgun ownership.

According to statistics by the British Home Office, 3,000 crimes involving handguns were


9/26

recorded in 1999-2000, including the 42 homicides, 310 cases of attempted murder, 2561

robberies, and 204 burglaries as a result of the gun ban.

3). A Zogby/SA survey of 1,015 likely voters in June 2002 concluded that 75% of

Americans believe the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right proven in

http://www.exodusnews.com/NATIONAL/national090.htm

[Exodus On Line] plus the Second Amendment Foundations site of

http://www.saf.org/pub/rkba/press-releases/Zogby1.htm

ABC News determined the rate to be 77% according to ABC News on May 14, 2002.

4). The FBI Uniform Crime Statistics in 1994 mentioned that 2/3 of the people who die

each year from gun fire are criminals being shot by other criminals.

5). Dr. Gary Kleck, and University of Florida man using FBI Uniform Crime Statistics from

1997, shown that among the 15 states with the highest homicide rates, 10 have

restrictive or very restrictive gun control laws. Maryland has the toughest gun control

laws in the nation and ranks #1 in robberies, and #3 in both in violent crime and murder.

In the FBI Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) for 2000, p. 79, Table 5 Index of Crime by State

presented that 20% of U.S. homicides occur in just 4 cities with just 6% of the population

of the U.S.A. (in NYC, Chicago, Detriot, and D.C.) and each has a virtual prohibition on

private handguns.

6). After passing their concealed carry law, Florida's homicide rate fell from 36%

above the national average to 4% below, and remains below the national average (as of

the last reporting period, 2005). This is proven by the stats from Shall issue: the newwave of concealed handgun permit laws, from Cramer C and Kopel D. (in Golden CO:

Independence Institute Issue Paper from October 17, 1994). According to the FBI,

Uniform Crime Reports, 2004 (this excludes Hawaii and Rhode Island as they are small

populations and geographic isolation create other determinants to violent crime), states

that disallow concealed carry have violent crime rates 11% higher than national averages.

7). More information on this topic can be found at: http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-

facts/5.1/gun-facts-5.1-print.pdf


10/26

Surprisingly of many Republicans support strict Gun Control Policies:

Republicans are just as guilty as Democrats in terms of seeking strict gun control laws. Atleast the Democrats are blatant in their rhetoric of disarming the populace, but Republicans aremore in a deceptive way to convey that exact message. Thats one more sign of this 2-partysystem of being nothing more than a real show [It has been controlled by the CFR since 1921].Heres some facts:

a). In 1969, journalist William Safire asked Richard Nixon what he thought about gun control."Guns are an abomination," Nixon replied. According to Safire, Nixon went on to confess that,"Free from fear of gun owners' retaliation at the polls, he favored making handguns illegal andrequiring licenses for hunting rifles." (from http://www.reformed-theology.org/html/issue11/dont_blame_liberals.htm)

b). It was President George Bush, Sr. who banned the import of "assault weapons" in 1989, andpromoted the view that Americans should only be allowed to own weapons suitable for "sportingpurposes."


11/26

c). It was Governor Ronald Reagan of California who signed the Mulford Act in 1967,"prohibiting the carrying of firearms on one's person or in a vehicle, in any public place or on anypublic street." The law was aimed at stopping the Black Panthers, but affected all gun owners.Twenty-four years later, Reagan was still pushing gun control. "I support the Brady Bill," he saidin a March 28, 1991 speech, "and I urge the Congress to enact it without further delay."

d). One of the most aggressive gun control advocates today is Republican mayor Rudolph Giulianiof New York City, whose administration sued 26 gun manufacturers in June 2000, and whosepolice commissioner, Howard Safir, proposed a nationwide plan for gun licensing, complete withyearly "safety" inspections.

e). Another Republican, New York State Governor George Pataki, on August 10, 2000, signed intolaw what The New York Times called "the nations strictest gun controls," a radical programmandating trigger locks, background checks at gun shows and "ballistic fingerprinting" of guns soldin the state. It also raised the legal age to buy a handgun to 21 and banned "assault weapons," thesale or possession of which would now be punishable by seven years in prison.

f). President George W. Bush continues to support the ban of assault weapons by Title IX of theFederal Violent Crime Control Act of 1994. Clinton passed this priority with high support byRepublicans [at September 13, 1994].

g). The Hatch-Craig Gun Control Amendment (May 14, 1999) was passed and headed byRepublican Senator Orrin Hatch (from Utah) and Republican Senator Larry Craig [Idaho]by a 48-47 vote. It called for more restrictions on gun ownership by background checks for anyprivate gun shows and assign a U.S. attorney to every district for the purpose of harassing gunowners. 47 out of 55 Republican senators voted for this legislation. At July 18, 2001, 164 HouseRepublicans dropped the No U.N. Gun control policy and it was proposed by Ron Paul [TheRepublican Senator from Texas]. This bill was to boycott the U.N.s illegal gun control policies takingaway guns from civilians and there are many other examples of this.


12/26

*The GOP, on the other hand, uses treachery and deception to mislead the citizenry into thinkingthat they will protect the right to keep and bear arms. Yet, it is clearly evident that they areenemies of liberty as well as the some of the Democrats. That is why Im an independent. I dont

trust the Republicans or the Democrats unconditionally at all. The Democratic PresidentJohn F. Kennedy believed in the Second Amendment wholeheartedlyinstead. This is evident in his 2 quotes:

"I am pleased to accept Life Membership in the National Rifle Association and extend to

your organization every good wish for continued success."-John F. Kennedy, March 20, 1961

"By calling attention to 'a well regulated militia', the 'security' of the nation, and the

right of each citizen 'to keep and bear arms', our founding fathers recognized the

essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the

fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to the Second Amendment will ever be a

major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains an important declaration of

our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to

participate in the defense of his country. For that reason, I believe the Second

Amendment will always be important."

-John F. Kennedy, April 1960 (Guns, "Know Your Lawmakers", April 1960, Page 4)


13/26

Senator Hubert H. Humphrey agreed with gun rights as well:

Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter howpopular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that

firearms should not be very carefully used, and that definite safety rules of precautionshould not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to keep and bear arms is justone more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against a tyrannywhich now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved always to bealways possible."-Sen. Hubert H. Humphrey

"Know Your Lawmakers", Guns Magazine, p. 4, February 1960

The Nazi Connection to Gun Control

It is a known historical fact that Hitler supported gun control. On of the laws passed by the Naziswas called the Weapons Law passed at March 18, 1938. That law only had firearms ownership tothe Nazi party members and other reliable people. This Nazi Law barred Jews from businessesinvolving firearms being racist obviously. Another Nazi who signed the law was Minister WilhelmFrick. These laws are recorded at Reichsgestezblatt (equivalent of the U.S. Federal Register) at1943-1944 recorded a t the U.S. Library of Congress. Dr. Solynom Fekete translated the Nazi law


14/26

into English. The guns restricted on the Jewish people was one of the many reasons for theextremely high numbers of Jewish deaths along with other people. Again, a people thats armed andforeright in their resistance and opposition to tyranny will overcome the tactics of a tyrannical force.The Gestapo of Germany enforced these gun control measures. What does this have do with theU.S.? Plenty. The Nazi Law is found to be completely similar to the USAs Gun Control Act of1968. This illegal law was proposed as early as August 1963. Later in the decade in 1968, astronger debate raged over gun control proceeded over urban riots, etc. Senator D. Tydings (D-MD)was the militant who wanted the trash bill passed, yet U.S. Representative John Dingell (D-MI) whotestified at those Senator hearings on gun expressed legitimate concerns over the issue. Dingellclaimed that it might lead to the confiscation of firearms as happened in Nazi Germany and Tydingsangrily accused Dingell of using scare tactics, but he really didnt. Also the late Roman CatholicSenator Thomas J. Dodd of Connecticut was involved in the bill. By after WWII during theNuremburg trials, Thomas was an assistant to the chief prosecutor at the Nuremburg war crimetrials. He must have had access to the German text of the Nazi Weapons Law along with otherdocuments which he in fact did. Dodd tried to show that the Nazi law wasnt similar to the 1968 Gunlaw [which is a lie], but it silenced Dingells criticisms. Dodd isnt a Nazi, but supported the Naziprecept of gun control which invalidates the Constitution and moral rights.

Later it passed. A book was created by Jewish pro-gun rights heroes by Jay Simkin and AaronZelman [ex-Vietnam vet and the founder of Jews for Preservation of Firearms Ownership. Their

logo is a Hexagram being pagan though which they dont know.] called Gun Control: Gateway toTyranny outlines this 100% fully. GET THE BOOK. It shows hard evidence when looking at theNazi law and the 1968 U.S. law, its the same like law-abiding firearm owners in Illinois,Massachusetts, and even in New Jersey people must carry identification cards based on formatsfrom directly the Nazi Weapons Law. The 1938 Nazi Weapons Law therefore disarmed, enslaved,and murdered the many innocent victims of the Holocaust and in the United States with its GunControl Act of 1968 and is enforced by the modern day Gestapo, known as the Bureau ofAlcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms (BATF). John Ashcroft, George W. Bush, Charles Schumer, DianeFeinstein, and other have dealt with 2nd Amendment issues. Numerous folks want this new worldorder as well. That is why many foreign troops (including the U.S. military) have conductedexercises throughout America. Some researchers believe that a foreign invasion is a possibility inAmerica. Always remember friends, that Adolf Hitler, Mussolini, Himmler, V.I. Lenin, JosephStalin, Moa Zedong, and other mass murderers or dictators supported gun bans against innocent

citizens.

This will occur by UN/NA TO/foreign troops through martial law and under martial law. Theseforeign troops are trained even here to accomplish that goal by the possible Sino-Muslim-Russian-Mexican-Cuban-German-EU-NATO-UN invasion coming unto our soil in the years tocome. There are over 600,000 U.N. troops here now!!!


15/26

The NRA has lost its salt

The National Rifle Association has indeed lost its original salt and is part ofthe establishment basically. The NRA was once an authentic, fruitful, and truthfulorganization. The NRA was founded in 1871 by an act of the New York Legislatureat the request of Union officers. In fact, 8 out of the first 10 Presidents of the NRAwere Union veterans. President Ulysses S. Grant (who lineage relates to theIlluminati Collins bloodline) was elected the 8th President of the NRA and theNRA elected General Phillip Sheridan after Grant finished his term. Phillip

Sheridan removed the governors of Texas and Louisiana for failure to suppressthe KKK. During the 1950's-1960's, groups of blacks organized a NRA chapter inorder to obtain surplus military rifles to fight off Klansmen. The NRAsupported the Gun Control Act of 1968 (and the U.S. gun ban in 1933), whichsuppressed a lot of citizens from owning weapons.

The NRA for more than a century had committed some moral actions in guntraining, education, and programs (they are many honorable people in the NRAtoday), but the ILA (Institute for Legislature Action) and PVF (Political VictorFund) existed within the NRA. Both the ILA and PVF are nothing more thancompromisers to preserve their jobs rather than our freedoms. NRA ExecutiveVice President Wayne LaPierre supported Project Exile, a program letting thefederal government instead of rightfully allowing the state to prosecute guncrimes. This is solely the state's responsibility. LaPierre commented on ProjectExile that no guns should be in schools period except for the police. Hey, thatwould exclude the ROTC gun displays so they can go to jail now if they have agun.


16/26

LaPierre contends that there ought to be no unsupervised youth with guns. Thiswould even strongly punish innocent accidents or youth shooting cans. Gunsused by youth in the right way is nothing immoral and it should be encouraged.LaPierre also seeks background checks, gun cases, and tests to own a gun. Wow,So much for the 2nd Amendment wherefore we are entitled to self-defense or

the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. I dont agree with Ron Paul onevery issue, but even he was heavily pro-Second Amendment (but the NRAgave him a B rating in a false way). The smoking gun outlining treasonby theNRA is on October 8, 2003 court case between the NRA. The NRA attorneyStephen Halbrook said these following words to the D.C. federal court in oralarguments:

The court: The government can put restrictions on the right to bear arms.Mr. Halbrook: Your honor, we are here wanting to register handguns. We arenot here wanted unrestricted access. We're not here asking to carry them, other

than in the house.The court: You're saying that the government can impose reasonablerestrictions?Mr. Halbrook: Yes, your honor, Yes, your honor.(From http://keepandbeararms.com/Silveira/Halbrook.asp)

THIS IS WRONG BY THE NRA since they explicitly believe in theregistration of firearms. Halbrook and others needs to realize that the NaziAdolph Hitler, through his Gun Control Act of 1938, in the 1930's-1940's,Communist Mao Zedong, Fascist Mussolini, Stalin, and others all believed inthe registration and eventually banning of all firearms. These acts contributed

to the genocide of innocent people in the nations that dictators resided in.

History will repeat itself if we don't learn about it. The Nazi laws are exactlysimilar to the USA's Gun Control Act of 1968. Also, wasn't extreme gun controlracist for African Americans in the U.S.A. not only the Jewish people inside NaziGermany? Yes, since even a 1792 federal law restricted black men from even toserve in state militias. Even free blacks were banned to have guns before theCivil War in several states. Alabama banned all guns in 1866 and disarmedblack people was one of the many reasons why the Masonic Ku Klux Klanterrorized black families who couldn't shoot back leading to 3,446 deaths from

the end of the Civil War to the end of the Civil Rights Movement. Let's notforget the racist nation of India having Hindus restricting 300 million Dalits toown weapons, live a great life, and have basic liberty and human rights asexplained by Velu Annamalai and others. Gandhi is turning in his grave atIndia now (Gandhi called the Untouchables "Children of God") and if Indiaseeks to become a real Republic fulfilling its full potential, which I want, theymust give the Dalits full rights.


17/26

Peaceful American people now of all races are treated as slaves in some cases bythe violations of our liberties going on. History seems to repeat itself now sinceunending laws continually restricting the right to bear arms always leading toconfiscation and extermination. That's a fact. The NRA attorney said that weshouldn't carry guns except in the house, which is lunacy. We can carry guns in

or out of our house if we seek to and that's very legal.

The NRA once supported Senator Arlen Specter in Pennslyvania. Spector isknown for being anti-gun, pro-war on terror, and pro-abortion. In 2008, the NRAsupport the anti-gun bill of HR 2640 (which can deprive hunters their rights toown a gun under certain circumstances). HR 2640 or the Veterans DisarmamentAct -- which has already passed the House -- would place any veteran who hasever been diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) on the federalgun ban list. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy of New York, a chief sponsor of the bill,loved the bill. This was done in response to the events of the massacre in Virginia

Tech. McCarthy admitted that this is a first step toward a National database. Thisis exactly what President Bill Clinton did over seven years ago when hisadministration illegitimately added some 83,000 veterans into the NationalCriminal Information System (NICS system) -- prohibiting them from purchasingfirearms, simply because of afflictions like PTSD. The Military Order of thePurple Heart is opposed to this legislation. It doesnt even offer a trial by a juryto define who is a heavily mentally ill (Its defined by a committee or a doctor).Many NRA leaders love to protect the gun rights of hunters, but they dontfully want to protect the 2nd Amendment rights of all American citizens.

A group like Gun Owners of America is a real organization supporting gun

rights. The establishments plan is to allow the federal government to control everycitizens actions with guns even if they innocent of no crime. This has beenpromoted by he new Attorney General of the Barack Obama administrationnamed Eric Holder.

Isn't it surprising that one of the men who infiltrated the National RifleAssociation was John M. Snyder, and according to Eric John Phelps: "a formerJesuit seminarian who is a member of the People's Order of St. Michael theArchangel and presently leading the effort to make 'St. Gabriel o f theSorrowful Mother' the patron saint of gun owners? In the light of the Jesuit

Conference seeking to ban all privately owned firearms, HOW RIDICULOUSCAN HE BE!!!!!!!" (Vatican Assassins: Wounded in the House of My Friends byEric Jon Phelps, pgs. 134, 2001).

The Jesuits have been anti-gun for decades in the United States of America. Onesuch Jesuit is named Rev. M. Pfleger. Hes a friend of Freemason Jesse Jacksonand Louis Farrakhan. The Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA) accuses Pflegerof calling for the death of a gun shop owner. An article form the ISRA says that:


18/26

During an address at an anti-gun rally in front of Chuck's, Rev. MichaelPfleger, pastor of St. Sabina's Church, exhorted the crowd to "drag" shop owner,John Riggio, from his shop "like a rat" and "snuff" him Of course, this Jesuit isan extremist and someone we should keep our eye on. Certain people believethat there aren't folks who want to ban all guns, but they are sadly mistaken.

Here's just some words by a few of these gun-grabbing extremists:

Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe. (DianeFeinstein, Associated Press, November 18, 1993)

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outrightban, picking up every one of them; "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in," Iwould have done it. (Diane Feinstein, CBS-TV's "60 Minutes," February 5, 1995) "Ifa bill to ban handguns came to the house floor, I would vote for it. (Pete Stark,Town Hall Meeting, June 1999, Fremont California)

"My staff and I right now are working on a comprehensive gun-control bill. Wedon't have all the details, but for instance, regulating the sale and purchase ofbullets. Ultimately, I would like to see the manufacture and possession ofhandguns banned except for military and police use. But that's the endgame.And in the meantime, there are some specific things that we can do withlegislation." (Chicago Tribune, December 5, 1999)

"We in Europe do not consider the freedom to buy weapons a human right."(Gisela Kallenbach. She is the German member of the European Parliament, EUlegislattors push together gun controls, International Herald Tribune, November

29, 2007).

"My staff and I right now are working on a comprehensive gun-control bill. Wedon't have all the details, but for instance, regulating the sale and purchase ofbullets. Ultimately, I would like to see the manufacture and possession ofhandguns banned except for military and police use. But that's the endgame. Andin the meantime, there are some specific things that we can do with legislation."(BOBBY RUSH, U.S. REPRESENTATIVE FROM ILLINOIS, Chicago Tribune, December 5,1999). This is wild since Rush is an ex-Black Panther. Black Panthers back thensupported gun rights and now Rush opposes it.

"I want to see people disarmed. I want people disarmed in our major cities. How's that for aplan? I don't think we should all be armed, and I don't think more guns is the answer. I

think it's wacky to say that the solution to armed robbery and killing in our streets in big

cities is to put more arms in the streets."

-Chris Matthews from MSNBC


19/26

Radical Gun Control and Racism

Radical gun control in America have always been used to discriminate and disenfranchise black

people, immigrants, and other minorities. As Justice Buford of the Florida Supreme Courtnoted in his concurring opinion narrowly construing a Florida gun control statute, the

original Act of 1893 and the Act in 1901 in Florida was used to disarm black Americans.

The South even in the 17th century were known to disarm black people. In 1640, the first

recorded restrictive legislation passed concerning blacks in Virginia excluded them from

owning a gun. In early America, the French Black Code in 1751 required Louisiana colonist toprevents blacks to own guns and if they refuse they were required that "any black carryingany potential weapon, such as a cane." If a black refused to stop on demand, and was onhorseback, the colonist was authorized to "shoot to kill." (Thomas N. Ingersoll, "Free Blacks ina Slave Society: New Orleans, 1718-1812", _William and Marry Quarterly_, 48:2 [April, 199 1], 178-79.)

There were many laws in French Louisiana and early America that prevents many AfricanAmericans to bear any arms even freed blacks. It existed in Virginia, North Carolina, and otherplaces around the country. A North Carolina Supreme Court statue gave the ruling that:

That if any free negro, mulatto, or free person of color, shall wear or carry about his or herperson, or keep in his or her house, any shot gun, musket, rifle, pistol, sword, dagger orbowie-knife, unless he or she shall have obtained a license therefore from the Court ofPleas and Quarter Sessions of his or her county, within one year preceding the wearing,keeping or carrying thereof, he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be


20/26

indicted thereof. (State v. Newsom, 5 Iredell 181, 27 N.C. 250 (1844).

When the first U. S. official arrived in New Orleans in 1803 to take charge of this new

American possession, the planters sought to have the existing free black militia disarmed,

and otherwise exclude "free blacks from positions in which they were required to bear

arms," including such non-military functions as slave-catching crews. The New Orleans

city government also stopped whites from teaching fencing to free blacks, and then, when

free blacks sought to teach fencing, similarly prohibited their efforts as well. Elijah Newson[A free African American] was indicted in Cumberland County in June of 1843 for carrying a shotgunwithout a license an d the North Carolina Supreme Court still kept up with the status quo ofrestricting him his 2nd Amendment rights by virtue of a license issue. The Westernstates with concerns over Native American tension gave blacks [free or slave] the right to beararms only with a license like in the 1798 Kentucky Comprehensive Act to use it on frontierplantations, etc. Whites didnt have to use a license. After the civil war and the immoral slaverywas abolished, the Black Codes [a new form of slavery] rose up. The Black Codes were thebeginning of Jim Crow. In the Black Codes required licenses for blacks to carry gun or a simple

Bowie knife. The Special Report of the Antislavery Conference of 1867 noted withparticular emphasis that under these Black Codes blacks were "forbidden to own or

bear firearms, and thus were rendered defenseless against assaults." (Reprinted in H.HYMAN, THE RADICAL REPUBLICANS AND RECONSTRUCTION 219 [1967]).TheBlack Codes tried to restrict African Americans the right to bear arms. This issomething that many neo-Confederates dont mention. The fight for liberty and thebattle against the Black Codes were strong in the late 1800s. The Civil Rights Act of1866 is a federal law that made anyone born in America a citizen of America. Theextremist Freemason Andrew Johnson vetoed the law, but the Republicans to theircredit override the Republicans veto. The creators of this act wanted the freed slavesto keep and bear arms. Representative Henry J. Raymond (R., N.Y.) explained thatthe rights of citizenship entitled the freedmen to all the rights of United Statescitizens: "He has a defined status: he has a country and a home; a right to defend

himself and his wife and children; a right to bear arms ...." Senator WilliamSalisbury (D., Del.) added that " [i] n most of the southern States, there has existed alaw of the State based upon and founded in its police power, which declares thatfree Negroes shall not have the possession of firearms or ammunition. This billproposes to take away from the States this police power." I congratulate Salisburyand Raymond for their common sense approach on this issue. Many Republicanswanted black people to defend themselves against the terrorist KKK in the late 1800s.Im not a Republican or a Democrat, but you have to give credit when credit is due.The Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment were passed with heavyRepublican assistance. So, racists in South tried to disarm blacks by banning cheaphandguns, so many freedmen couldnt afford weapons for self defense. The MasonicKKK came and killed thousands of blacks for many reasons, but one reason was that theKlan wanted to enforce illegal disarmament (against black Americans). Many blacks desiredguns for expressing their self-defense rights against blood-thirsty racists. For decades, "guncontrol" helped keep black people defenseless against lynching. Between 1882 and 1968,3,446 blacks were murdered in the U.S. by lynching.


21/26

According to www.jpfo.org/gpj4.htm:

People should know that American "gun control" laws were first created to make sureBlack people could not revolt or escape from slavery. After the Civil War, former slave-states devised more "gun control" laws. Disarmed by these laws, free Black people were

defenseless against repressive police and racist attacks. Over 3,700 Black people werelynched, and thousands of others were assaulted, intimidated and terrorized by the KuKlux Klan and racist mobs. Today's "gun control" laws are just like those which theslaveholders and Klansmen supported. Here is a sampling: Gun bans in slave states(Virginia, Maryland, Georgia, Mississippi) and after the Civil War (Alabama, SouthCarolina). License and registration requirements before the Civil War (Florida,Delaware) and after (Mississippi, Louisiana). Post-Civil War bans on inexpensiveguns (Tennessee, Arkansas), and special high taxes and fees on guns (Alabama,Texas). Warrantless searches of Black people's homes to look for firearms (pre-CivilWar Florida) (end of website source).

In 1941, Florida Supreme Court Justice Buford admitted that Florida's gun control laws (even the

original Act of 1893) were passed for the purpose of disarming black American laborers, and werenever intended to be applied to the white population. The Black Codes were legally abolished withthe Civil Rights Act of 1965 and other laws. At 1968, the Gun Control Act was past to curb rioting,but it was also used to prevent law-abiding blacks in urban areas to defend themselves against

criminals therefore creating more government control over the populace. In his bookThe

Saturday Night Special, anti-gun journalist Robert Sherrill frankly admitted that the Gun

Control Act of 1968 was "passed not to control guns but to control Blacks." (R.

SHERRILL, THE SATURDAY NIGHT SPECIAL 280 [1972]). The government makingillegal laws in order to get more control is the oldest play in the book. For years, this has all occurredfor the control of the black and the world population to create the New World Order. Thats theirplan. Evil radical gun control isnt limited to the South. In the Northeast, gun control was fueled byxenophobic rhetoric against Eastern and Southern European immigrants. So, the AmericanProtective Association and the Immigration Restriction League called for a ban on the right ofimmigrants to own handguns. New York passed the Sullivan law. It banned people from owning a

gun without a police permit. The New York City Police Department thereby acquired the

official and wholly arbitrary authority to deny or permit the possession of handguns. The

department in NYC used in its effort to disarm the city's Italian population. This caused

similar laws to spread across America. Even today, owning a legal gun in New York City is

difficult unless youre wealthy, you have political power, and apart of the social elite.

Firearm restrictions occurred against Native Americans as well. The Army stole all of the

weapons and horses from the Sioux. During Reconstruction, the sale of firearms to Native

Americans were banned. Federal law banned the sale of arms and munitions to so-called

hostile Native Americans. Idaho once prohibited the sale of firearms and ammunition to

Native Americans too.


22/26

There were the Deacons of Defense back in the 1960s that protected civil rights activists

from the Klan in Louisiana plus throughout the South. In Jonesboro, Louisiana, the

Deacons made history when they compelled Louisiana governor John McKeithen tointervene in the citys civil rights crisis. John made a compromise with city leaders. This

was the first capitulation to the civil rights movement by a Deep South governor. Stokely

Carmichael points out that Here is a group [Deacons] which realized that the law and

law enforcement agencies would not protect people, so they had to do it themselves

the Deacons and all other blacks who resort to self-defense represent a simple answer to

a simple question: what man would not defend his family and home from attack? Civil

rights attorney Don B. Kates (I disagree with Don Kates that the Civil Rights Movement

would of stopped if more immoral, strict gun control rules were in the South. The reason is

that even in tyranny, strong people of many races would of still fought for true God-given

liberties like equality) noted about the Civil Rights era in the 1950s-1960s that:

As a civil rights worker in a Southern state during the early 1960's, I found that thepossession of firearms for self-defense was almost universally endorsed by theblack community, for it could not depend on police protection from the KKK . . . .The black lawyer for whom I principally worked . . . attributed the relativequiescence of the Klan to the fact that the black community was so heavilyarmed . . . .What might have happened to civil rights workers if there had been strict gun control inthe South is exemplified in the 1969 machine gunning of several hundred marchers byright wing extremists in Mexico City. Both the possession of automatic weapons andthe act of murder are as strictly forbidden by law in Mexico as they are in the U.S.Nevertheless, the police made no arrests - either on the scene or when the attackers

later invaded the hospitals to finish off the wounded . . . .

During the civil rights turmoil in the South, Klan violence was bad enough; it wouldhave been worse with gun control. It was only because black neighborhoods were fullof people who had guns and could fight back that the Klan didn't shoot up civil rightsmeetings or terrorize blacks by shooting at random from cars. Moreover, civil rightsworkers' access to firearms for self-defense often caused Southern police to preservethe peace as they would not have done if only the Ku Kluxers had been armed . . . .In the 1950's and early 1960's . . . over a hundred civil rights workers were murdered


23/26


24/26

other minorities. Its very hypocritical for some of these limousine liberals tohave guns in their homes (or allow their bodyguards to protect them withguns), but they wont allow law abiding citizens to own firearms in anefficient manner. These people include Rosie ODonnell and Arthur OchsSulzberger. Arthur had a gun permit even the husband of Dr. Joyce Brothers.

Dr. Brothers promoted the lie that firearms ownership is indicative of malesexual inadequacy. Gun prohibition advocates Nelson Rockefeller and JohnLindsey had such gun permits. Many of these anti-gun radicals are from thesuburbs or are upper class knowing little to nothing about firearms or theiruses. Some of them know little to nothing about what really occurs in poorerneighborhoods. These people talk about the police, but even the SupremeCourt says that there is no constitutional right to be protected by the stateagainst being murdered by criminals. Furthermore, the courts have ruled that thepolice have no duty to protect the individual citizen, absent facts establishing a special

relationship between the authority and the person assaulted. Fact is that anyone regardlessof race, class, socioeconomic stats, or any background should a right to own a weapon if

they choose to regardless of what area they live. I reject racism. Therefore, the right to beararms is a true tenet that ought to be preserved. This is why Im for the 2 nd Amendment.These extremists for centuries banned the right of my people to own guns for self defense.These radicals hated the right of all of the people to protect their persons, property, andfamilies. Even today, the ideological descendants of these extremists like the neo-cons wantthe bad policy of cutting services, war mongering (especially in Iran during 2010), andgetting rid of major governmental protections in our society. So, Im an independent.Everything is coming full circle in my mind about various issues.


25/26

Do the Iraqis have the right to Bear Arms?

Iraqis do have the right to keep and bear arms. There was the U.S. atrocity capturedon video. This atrocity was carried out against people in Iraq on the basis that theyhad guns. Some of the Iraqis there didnt have the weapons that they were alleged to

have. So, people even if they have weapons legitimately in Iraq are fair game forkilling by remote control. The U.S. establishment says that they have "liberated" theIraqi people. This is a fake kind of liberation when the Iraqi people can't even keepand bear arms. They need it even more than Americans do, because of the chaoticviolence unleashed by the war. The truth is that Saddam Hussein was a violent andrepressive dictator. Saddam Husseins evil deed can never be justified or excused. Thevery few freedoms that he allowed was the right of the people was to right to beararms. In Baghdad, personal gun ownership was common before the war. The mediaeven reported gun sales increasing in anticipation of the U.S. invasion. This allchanged with the Iraqi people were liberated from Saddam. The American militaryassisted the new U.S.-friendly regime in going door to door to round up all of the

personal weapons in Baghdad. There is an income tax over in Iraq, the rise ofSharia law, and the ratification of a Soviet-style Constitution. There is persecution ofwomen, Christian and Jewish even after the fall of Saddam. This gun control is one ofthe fake "freedoms" in Iraq (this reality is bounded financially by the U.S. taxpayer).

So, the new Iraqi Constitution promotes a theocracy since Article 2 of itsConstitution says that Islam is the official religion of the state and its a fundamentalsource of legislation. No law that contradicts the established provisions of Islam may beestablished. So, the Pentagon wanted a theocratic Sharia law to exist in Iraq that negates true

religious freedom. Thats wrong since all humans have the right to believe in whatever creed

they wish. Others believe that this immoral disarmament of innocent people wasnecessary for the function of the war. This is another reason to question the war. Now,Iraqis are scared to be blown away if they are carrying personal weapons. The truth isthat gun rights is universal. No military occupation can claim that a nation isexperiencing "liberation" if that liberation involves massive weapons confiscation(aimed against the people supposedly being liberated). It's a fact that when wasmartial law was imposed in New Orleans during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina,something evil occurred. U.S. military personnel back from Iraq were brought in toassist the local and state authorities. Later, these forced themselves went door to doorconfiscating the weapons of peaceful Americans. This is even these citizens mostneeded them. The war on Iraq was always an act of gun control, which was an act toenforce UN resolutions regarding "weapons of mass destruction." It's impossible tobe free and safe when the government has the tyrannical policy to deny the humanright to keep and bear arms. Without this right, America wouldn't of existed after

defeating the British Empire during the Revolutionary War. It's as simple as that. Not

to mention that prohibiting firearm ownership among law-abiding citizenswill do nothing to reduce violent crime, because criminals by definition willdisregard any law.

By Timothy


26/26

Ever since I was teenager, Ive supported the Second

Amendment. My support hasnt waned then and it wontdecrease now.

Date post:	30-May-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	timothy
View:	217 times
Download:	0 times

The Second Amendment (Gun Rights)

Documents