61
THE SESAR PROGRAMME R&I 2020: FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
THE SESAR PROGRAMME R&I 2020: FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
THE SESAR PARTNERSHIP
3
Change in Air Traffic Management infrastructure is inevitable
•
Implementing the Single European Sky
4
Performance Safety Human factor
Performance scheme
Performance Review Body
Functional Airspace Blocks
Network Manager
National Supervisory Authorities
EASA Crisis coord.
cell
Airport observatory
Specific sectoral dialogue Committee
Consultative expert
group on social dimension
of the SES
Airports
European ATM Master Plan
SESAR Joint Undertaking
Common projects
Technology Technology
5
The Fundamental Changes of ATM
INTEGRATION OF AIRPORTS
THE 4D TRAJECTORY
PRINCIPLE
AUTOMATION
Human operators
concentrate on high value-added tasks
THE SYSTEM WIDE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
COLLABORATIVE NETWORK PLANNING Integrated with airport operations planning and airspace
user flight planning
Integrating airports - time synchronised
operations of surface trajectories and flight
turn-around
Integrating airspace users flight systems to build
predictable time synchronised flight
precision
The Intranet for Air Traffic Management
FAA visit January 22 2014
An EU framework for modernising ATM
SESAR definition
ATM Master plan
Development & validation
Deployment
Common projects
Governance
Incentives
Deployment programme
Eurocontrol
The SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU)
EUR 2.1 bio PPP (European Union, Eurocontrol and Industry)
15 other members
13 associate partners = 110 companies in total 20+ countries
3000 people working on SESAR
300+ projects
Duration: Dec. 2016 Recent position of the EU Transport Ministers:
extension until 2024, subject to….
European Union
2 FOUNDING MEMBERS
FAA visit January 22 2014 7
Unique Public Private Partnership (PPP)
Members
Associate partners
The SJU a unique PPP
2 FOUNDING MEMBERS
SJU Involves All Actors
A Multi-Stakeholder approach at the heart of our way of working
Airports
Ground Industry
Airborne Industry
National Authorities/
Military
R&D community
Staff associations
Air Navigation
Service Providers
Airspace users
THE SESAR PROGRAMME
ATM Master Plan
Single
European Sky
The Innovation and R&D Cycle
Concept development, System development & verification,
Validation, Delivery
SESAR Solutions
Programme Management & Technical process domains to support and monitor the execution of the R&D cycle
Prog1 WP-E
Prog1 WP3-16, B,C
Research-Innovation
Exploratory Research (WPE)
Focussing on:
Business Agility
Decision Support
Environment & Meteorology
CNS/ATM (Automation)
Operating Concepts
The Human Factor
Mastering Complex Systems
Safely
System Architecture
& System Design
Information Management, Uncertainty & Optimisation
Enabling Change in
ATM
Towards Higher Level
of Automation in
ATM
11 Projects 7 PhDs
17 Projects 13 PhDs 3 Projects
3 Projects 6 Projects
13
Overseen by SJU Scientific Committee
Open calls for participation
• Starting point: – Implementation of SES initiatives has so far not met
expectations – Up to now solution seemed to be regulation –
orientated
• Research question: – How to create the right environment to generate a
successful introduction of the new air traffic management technologies?
– Can change come from within the sector?
• Methodology – What can we learn from parallel experiences? – Economic modelling using game theory, concepts
of industrial organisation, regional forerunners, etc.
14
Accelerating Change of Air Traffic Management by Regional Forerunners - ACCHANGE
Time based separation
Enhanced situational awareness
Ground safety nets
Dynamic vortex separation
Brake to vacate
Low Visibility procedures using satellite GBAS
Point Merge
Approach Procedures with Vertical Guidance
Continuous Climb & Descent
Business & Mission trajectory
Trajectory authorisation & revision using datalink
Cruise climb
Free routing
System interoperability with air & ground data sharing
Trajectory Management Framework
Surface planning & routing
Integrated Departure & Arrival Manager
AMAN & Point Merge
Arrival & Departure Management
Complexity Assessment & Resolution
Airport Operations Planning
Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace
Cruise climb
User Driven Prioritisation Process
Integrated Controller Working Position
Remote Tower
Network Operations Planning
Surveillance Ground System Enhancement
Enhanced situational awareness
Integrated Controller Working Position Conflict Detection & Resolution
Sector Team Operations
Performance Based Navigation
Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert
Collision Avoidance Monitoring
Airborne Spacing & Separation
Pilot Enhanced Vision
Optimised RNP
Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace
Satellite based Communication & Navigation
Enhanced Decision Support Tools
Enhanced ATFCM Process
Extended AMAN
Scope of Core Programme
How SESAR R&D Delivers
FAA visit January 22 2014 16
R&
D P
RO
JE
CT
S
MA
ST
ER
PL
AN
P
RO
GR
AM
ME
Time Based Operations
Trajectory Based Operations
2014
2017
Performance 2020+
RELEASE 1 SESAR Solutions
17
1. Precision Navigation (PRNAV) in a complex TMA 2. Validation of LPV approach as fallback for ILS 3. En Route Traffic Organizer for ATC controller 4. Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert for TMA specific
operations 5. Altitude capture laws improving compatibility with
ACAS & Automatic Responses to ACAS RA 6. DMAN Baseline to be used for Integration of AMAN-
DMAN 7. Low cost Departure data entry panel
TA
New ALT Capture law
no more nuisance RA
FL100
FL110
3400 feet/min 30 s = 1700 ft
Adjust vertical
speed
FL100
FL110
3400 feet/min
RA
RELEASE 2 SESAR Solutions
18
1. Point Merge in CDG 2. Towards User Preferred Routing 3. Automated support for Dynamic Sectorization 4. Single Airport Remote Tower 5. Time Based Separations for traffic in approach phase 6. Point Merge in complex TMA 7. AOC Data Increasing Trajectory Prediction Accuracy 8. Multi-Sector Planning
WHAT Digitally enhanced pre-flight briefing services (ePIB)
using Digital NOTAM data coming through SWIM
services from Digital NOTAM encoding applications
(prototypes) and digital MET data sources.
Aim
Improve the quality and the efficiency of information
transferred by reducing the noise caused by flight
irrelevant notifications
Reduce the time needed for information transfer, by
pinpoint filtering of information
Reduce the risk of misinterpretation (by pilots) of
information
Make the experience of retrieving and browsing the ePIB
information more enjoyable for users
Validation method Real Time Simulation
Validation : December 2014
Digitally Enhanced Briefing Services Validation (ePIB)
Page 19
Flight Trajectory
Management
System
(WP 13.2.1)
Digital Briefing
Application
(WP 13.2.2)
SWIM
Data Pool
Get data
AI/MET/Flow/etc.
Get data
AI/MET/Flow/etc.
Get flight data
trajectory/FPLProvide flight data
trajectory/FPL
Integrated Briefing Portal
Flight planning
functionality
PIB
functionality
PilotDispatcher/ARO
ATM Operator
On-board
briefing device
Demonstration Activities
• WHY :
– Apply SESAR Solution in other operational environment
– Generate further confidence to support buy-in from main stakeholders including regulators for future deployments
– Accompany SESAR pioneers all the way to pre-deployment
• WHAT
– 18 demonstration projects and 09 RPAS demonstrations
– Involving over 5000 commercial flights and 20 air operators
– Demonstrating significant performance gains can be achieved on flights within Europe and between Europe and North America, Latin America and Africa
– Final results of these projects will be gradually communicated in the course of 2014 and 2015
20
09 “RPAS Demonstration Projects”, which include integrated
pre-operational flight trials activities, have been selected:
RPAS “Demonstration Projects”…
Airports
RPAS Flight
Operator
Industry ANSP
21
A large number of stakeholders in key location in Europe
22
Coordinator
Air Operator
ANSP
RPAS.04 - Mediterranean ATM Live Exercise
MAIN OBJECTIVE: Demonstrate the validity and limits of the ad-hoc operational procedures and airworthiness rules as well as of the existing technologies and systems focusing on a gap analysis between existing RPAS capabilities and the required for RPAS insertion into non-segregated airspace.
VALIDATION APPROACH: Real-time simulations and flight trials on Alenia Aermacchi Sky-Y aircraft.
TYPE OF RPAS: MALE remotely piloted
PROJECT ENDS: October 2015
PARTNERS:
LOCATION: Italy
23
Global Cooperation & Interoperability
•Standards built on SESAR and NextGen developments will support harmonised Implementation and Regulation
•Programme level coordination enhanced by interoperability and wider industry buy-in.
EC/FAA Coordination
EUROCAE
RTCA etc.
NextGen SESAR
ICAO
MOVING FROM DEVELOPMENT TO DEPLOYMENT
Ensuring the deployment of SESAR R&D results
ATM Master Plan Outlines the essential operational and technological changes as well as standardisation and regulatory activities
PCP Cover a first package of essential changes identified in the MP with the sufficient maturity and justification to be deployed at European level
Updated in 2012
Proposal submitted by the SJU to the EC in May 2013. Formal consultation launched 02/12
PLA
NN
ING
VIE
W
BU
SIN
ESS
VIE
W
EC mandate received August 2012
27
6 PACKAGES IDENTIFIED FOR NEAR TERM IMPLEMENTATION (Relates to ICAO Block 1)
Building the infrastructure of the future
Key functional improvements addressing critical network performance deficiencies
1. Extended AMAN and PBN in high density TMAs
2. Airport Integration and Throughput Functionalities
3. Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route
4. Network Collaborative Management
5. iSWIM: ground-ground integration and aeronautical data management & sharing
6. Initial Trajectory Information Sharing: air-ground integration towards i4D
How much? The Investor’s View
Main influence factors for PCP
benefits
ANSP Productivity
Gains (+3,4%)
Airspace Capacity (+12,6%
TMA, +8,7 En-Route)
Airport Capacity (+3,9%)
Delayed flights
(-9,8%)
Delay length (-12,2%)
Fuel Burn (85,8
Kg/flight -2,1%)
Overall PCP Benefits
2014 - 2030; bn €; undiscounted (discounted)
Delay Cost Savings
CO2 Credit Savings
ANS Productivity gains
Fuel Cost Savings
Total Benefit
8,0 (3,3)
2,8 (1,1)
0,8 (0,3)
0,6 (0,2)
12,1 (4,9)
• Global framework ICAO based on input
• SESAR, NextGen (US), CARATS (Japan), others
• European input to ICAO based on SES/SESAR
• ATM Master Plan aligned with ASBU
• Global cooperation is essential
• EU – US for SESAR-NextGen
• Europe – other regions
• Europe – ICAO
Aviation = Global
SESAR RESEARCH & INNVOVATION 2020
Programme 2020 Key Features
32
Maturity Life Cycle
33
High Performing Airport Operations
• Flight deck automation (optimise speed ajustement, engine-off taxi)
• Brake to vacate via datalink
• Full integration of AMAN-DMAN –ASMGCS
• Total Airport management including passenger flow
• Remote tower for multiple airports
34
Optimised ATM Network Services
• User Driven Priority Process
• Rolling Network Operation Plan integrating Airport Operation Plan
• Dynamic Airspace configuration (e.g. sectoristaion)
• Dynamic Mobile Areas
35
Advanced Air Traffic Services
• Increased automation for conflict detection and resolution (4D Trajectory)
• Sectorless operations
• Multi sectors planning
• Full free routing accross borders (e.g. FAB) in high/very high traffic complexity
• Airborne Separation procedures and tooling (e.g. safety nets – STCA, ACAS)
36
Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure
• CNS
• SWIM : Airborne to Ground
• Civil RPAS; GA & Rotorcraft integration
• 4D Trajectory Management
37
POTENTIAL AREAS OF INTEREST
Areas of Interest
• Civil RPAS integration in ATM
• Cyber Security
• 4D Trajectory Management
• Advanced Airspace Management
• Airport Management integrated in the Network
• Very Large Scale Demonstration
39
40
Civil RPAS Requirements & Challenges
Requirements for RPAS integration are linked to the European ATM Master Plan and the ICAO Global Plan/ASBU timeline
RPAS will have to fit into the ATM system (and not the reverse), with required adaptations to enable the safe integration of unmanned systems
RPAS will have to prove to be as safe as current manned vehicle operations and, their behaviour in operations, to be equivalent to manned aviation, in particular for air traffic control
Refine the essential R&D activities for the integration in the EU Aviation System in the context of the SES initiative, as of 2016 and beyond
Identify globally interoperable and harmonised ATM requirements and enablers to meet the performance requirements
Produce a R&D and Validation programme - including planning, costs and priorities, as required by the different identified ATM requirements and enablers
Establish a high level implementation timeline, including costs and priorities
Provide material supporting the alignment of the legislative, financial and regulatory frameworks required for the deployment, including incentive mechanisms
Civil RPAS Definition Phase(1/2)
41
The Civil RPAS Definition Phase has to result in the following tree of activities:
Deliverable D.1: Regulatory and Business Framework
Deliverable D.2: Performance Requirements and Assessment
Deliverable D.3: Operational Changes in ATM
Deliverable D.4: Enabling Systems
Deliverable D.5: Validation Needs
Deliverable D.6: SESAR Civil RPAS R&D Progr. requirements and outline
Deliverable D.7: Input to the EU ATM Master Plan
Evaluation in progress - Kick-off end of July - End in March 2015
Civil RPAS Definition Phase(2/2)
42
The ATM System has to be trusted by the general public and by Governmental Authorities: sufficiently secure, resilient and trustworthy
As ATM System relies on SWIM: effective protection is essential to guarantee the effectiveness, efficiency and economy
Not only a technological change but also a cultural change due to its existing architecture, components and reliance on human operators
A systemic approach to cyber-security for SWIM, considering in particular best practices implemented in other sectors
An opportunity with regard to operational and cross-border interoperability (needs for international cooperation to ensure interoperability, standards definition...)
Need to understand the economic implications of any proposed investments in this area, for an accepted level of risk
Why a Cyber-Security Study?
43
Introduce a holistic approach to cyber-security which complement the SESAR ATM security approach
Provide a scalable approach and applicable across different stakeholders in different Member States at different levels of security maturity
Support the SESAR next developments, in particular SWIM
Be the grounds of a cyber-security strategy to participate to the effective deployment of the new ATM systems and to their interoperability
Consider the interoperability dimension, the definition of standards agreed at international level
Provide:
Deliverable D.1: an ATM Cyber-Security Threat and Vulnerability Assessment
Deliverable D.2: a SESAR Target ATM Cyber-Security Framework
Deliverable D.3: a SESAR Cyber-Security Maturity Assessment
Deliverable D.4: a SESAR Cyber-Security Strategy
Study kick-off in May 2014 – foreseen end March 2015
Objective and Scope of the Study
44
How can SESAR’s 4D trajectory management help?
45
Aircraft downlink their intended trajectory
(EPP)
Ground Trajectory Prediction becomes
more accurate
On request aircraft downlink min/max time over a point
And can precisely (+/- 10 seconds) be at a
point at the time we want them to (RTA)
Ground-ground IOP ensures trajectory
view is the same for all actors
SESAR: matching 2D air and ground trajectories
46
Ground Trajectory Prediction (TP)
Lateral discrepancy to be resolved by controllers
Route discrepancy indicator (2D)
EPP downlink (FMS trajectory) - Estimates according to FMS
horizontal speed schedule - Altitudes / flight levels according
to FMS vertical speed schedule Source: 04.03 D64 draft (MUAC RTS)
Top of Descent
Advanced flexible use of Airspace
Squadron Squadron
Squadron
Squadron
• Airspace Booking System linking the squadrons to Network Manager via National Management Cell
Dynamic Mobile Area (DMA) Type 1
• Defined by NM according to agreed plan, with times
DMA Type 2
• Defined along aircraft trajectory only where needed
Airport Integration in ATM – Problem Statement
50
ANSP ANSP
Approach Departure En-route En-route
Departure
Fix
Runway
Entry Point
Network
Operations
Plan
(NOP) Black Hole
Network
Operations
Plan
(NOP)
Entry Fix
TMA
Runway
Threshold
Airport Operations Plan (AOP)
• En-route-to-en-route-conversion of the Network Operations Plan (NOP), enriched by airport-specific data
• Single, common and collaboratively agreed rolling plan available to all airport stakeholders
• Purpose
– Provide common situational awareness
– Form the basis upon which stakeholder decisions relating to process optimisation can be made
51
Network & Airport Operations Plan
Rolling Network Operations Plan integrating Airport Operations Plan
Airport Operations Centre (APOC)
• Platform/operational structure which pro-actively manages the performance of present and short-term airport operations
• Gives a common operational overview of the airport to the airport stakeholders
• Supports information sharing, coordination and collaborative decision making
• Unique interface between the airport and the NM
53
CDG PMI
PARTICIPATIONS OPTIONS IN SESAR 2020
Building SESAR 2020
55
Call for expression of interest
56
Principles and Definitions
– “… the closer to the market the supported activity is, the larger the additional funding from other sources should be …”
– “innovation action' means an action primarily consisting of activities directly aimed at producing plans and arrangements or designs for new, altered or improved products, processes or services. For this purpose they may include prototyping, testing, demonstrating, piloting, large-scale product validation and market replication”
57
Co-financing rates
• Exploratory Research
– for research actions: up to 100% of the eligible costs
– for innovation actions, if some beneficiaries or linked third parties are non-profit legal entities and some are profit legal entities:
• Up to 100% of the eligible costs of the beneficiaries and linked third parties that are non-profit legal entities, and
• Up to 70% of the eligible costs of the other beneficiaries
58
Co-financing rates
• Core Programme and VLSD
– innovation actions
– if some beneficiaries or linked third parties are non-profit legal entities and some are profit legal entities:
• 100% of the eligible costs of the beneficiaries and linked third parties that are non-profit legal entities, and
• 70% of the eligible costs of the other beneficiaries
59
Eligible Costs
• Direct Costs: actual costs or unit costs in certain cases
• Indirect Costs: flat rate of 25% on the direct costs (minus subcontracting, costs incurred by third parties not used in the beneficiaries’ premises and costs of providing financial support to third parties
60
61
Thank you for your attention
www.sesarju.eu
