+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Date post: 10-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: vesta
View: 50 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. W hat makes an open place (e.g., plaza, mall, park, etc.) pleasant? How do we measure/assess the pleasant qualities of these spaces? What view of city life is put forward in this film? What was the societal impact (in New York City) of Whyte’s work?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
24
The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces What makes an open place (e.g., plaza, mall, park, etc.) pleasant? How do we measure/assess the pleasant qualities of these spaces? What view of city life is put forward in this film? What was the societal impact (in New York City) of Whyte’s work?
Transcript
Page 1: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

• What makes an open place (e.g., plaza, mall, park, etc.) pleasant?

• How do we measure/assess the pleasant qualities of these spaces?

• What view of city life is put forward in this film?• What was the societal impact (in New York City) of

Whyte’s work?

Page 2: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

• What ethical issues arise from Whyte’s filming behaviour occuring in the street? What does the current Canadian Tri-Council Ethics Code state about the filming of behaviour in public?

Page 3: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Characteristics of best used plazas:• higher proportion of groups rather than solitary

individuals• Greater proportion of female users• Variablility over day, week, season

*”People are most likely to sit where there are places to sit”

Page 4: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Design Criteria for Plazas• Movable chairs (benches are less desirable)• Seating area should be approximately 10% of the

total open space• Protection from sun, wind and noise (use trees and

water)• Availablility of food (snack bars, vendors, tables &

chairs)• Related to the street, near the action

Page 5: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Seagram Building, 375 Park Avenue (52nd to 53rd Streets, designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and Phillip Johnson (1958), who won an architectural competition arranged by Phyllis Lambert, architect and daughter of Sam Bronfman.

What building in Toronto did Mies van der Rohe design that is quite similar to Seagram’s?

Page 6: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

Page 7: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Seagram Building

Architects:Ludwig Mies van

der Rohe & Phillip Johnson

Built in 1958

Page 8: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Toronto-Dominion Centre

• Mies van der Rohe’s only Canadian building

Page 9: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Paley Park

• Designed by Zion & Breen on the site of the former Stork Club (just off 5th Avenue at 53rd Street

Page 10: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Paley Park

Page 11: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces
Page 12: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Design Criteria for Plazas:• “Triangulation: presence of

people or things that induce strangers to talk with each other

• Surveillance comes from vendors, newsstands, building employees.

• Dealing with “undesirables”: make the area appeal to anyone

Page 13: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Bryant Park Renovations

Movies, ice skating, & a cafe draw people into the park

Page 14: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Bryant Park Renovations

Movable chairs permit many sitting opportunities to facilitate differing activities

Page 15: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Bryant Park Renovations

Note the high density of users on a warm summer day

Page 16: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Bryant Park Renovations

A hawk visits the park!

Page 17: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Film: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Design Criteria for Indoor Spaces(e.g., atria, galleries, courtyards, arcades, concourses,

indoor plazas)

• Seating• Food• Retail stores• Public toilets• Presence

Page 18: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Underhill, P. (1999). Why we buy: The science of shopping. New York: Simon & Schuster.

• A fascinating description of Underhill’s company’s (Envirosell) research into consumer behaviour.

• % buying jeans after trying them on:– Females: 25%– Males: 65%

Page 19: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces
Page 20: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Underhill, P. (1999). Why we buy: The science of shopping. New York: Simon & Schuster.

A fascinating description of Underhill’s company’s (Envirosell) research into consumer behaviour.

% buying jeans after trying them on:

Females: 25%Males: 65%

Page 21: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Making Sense of Supermarket Shelf Displays

Page 22: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Envirosell at work

Page 23: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Examing price tags:Females: 86%Males: 72%

“Butt-brush” stops female purchasers

Importance of adjacenciesDetection of shopliftersImportance of shopping basket distributionRight turn bias of North American shoppers

Page 24: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces

Mean shopping times in a national housewares chain store (USA):

Women with women 8 min. 15 secs.Women with children 7 min. 19 secs.Women alone 5 min. 2 secs.Women with men 4 min. 41 secs.

How could you increase women’s shopping times for women accompanied by males?


Recommended