"The State of the Internet". Primer trimestre de 2011 (Akamai) Ag11

8/4/2019 "The State of the Internet". Primer trimestre de 2011 (Akamai) Ag11

1/40


2/40

Get the most out o theState te Internet with

our new Data Visualizationwww.k./hnn

Vw nd v ky

h h 100 n/n

c nd

n/n

sv & n

zd h


3/40

in nx q , w w k h h vn hd n h inn, w nnn

xnd h nn whn h , y nd y- nd -d .

Dvd bn

l h ed

Wh h n h dn, ak State of the Internet

n h y. ov h h v h y, wv d

nq vn n n h inn nd h nd v d

d y h ak inn inn p k h wh

inn nd inn nnn d nd h wd, nd

dn wh inn k n nd wh h k

n, nd h wn dv h inn.

Wh h nn n h v h q 2011, whn h v n

hhh h v nd nd n v h h y d h v .

in ddn, nd h q , w nhn nw d vzn , v

www.akamai.com/stateotheinternet, whh w , , nd h

n, nd hn n (nd dwnd) h h d d. th ny nd

h 100 n/n y nq ip dd n, nd w n xnd nd -v

d h und s n h .

thh h v h q 2011, v inn-d vn n d

dn h nd q, ndn:

th hdwn inn v n sy,

wn n ey nd ly

n h q;

Wd ipv6 Dy, whh w nndd

fh ipv6 n dn

W ;

apNic nn y

nd h nn ipv4 dd k

dy dwndn v ;

nd n h ry Wddn pn

W nd chn mddn, whh k

d n h W.


4/40

4 2011 ak thn, in. a rh rvd

t cnn

t cnnExEcutivE Summary 5

SEction 1: SEcurity 6

1.1 ak trf, t ornn cnr 6

1.2 ak trf, t pr 7

SEction 2: intErnEt PEnEtration 8

2.1 unq ipv4 addr 8

2.2 ipv4 addr s exhn 9

2.3 ipv6 adn 10

SEction 3: GEoGraPhy Global 11

3.1: g avr cnnn sd 123.2: g avr cnnn sd, cy Vw 13

3.3: g avr pk cnnn sd 15

3.4 g avr pk cnnn sd, cy Vw 16

3.5 g Hh brdnd cnnvy 18

3.6 g brdnd cnnvy 19

3.7 g Nrrwnd cnnvy 20

SEction 4: GEoGraPhy unitEd StatES 21

4.1 a pf avr cnnn sd 21

4.2 a pf avr cnnn sd, cy Vw 22

4.3 a pf avr pk cnnn sd 22

4.4 a pf avr pk cnnn sd, cy Vw 23

4.5 a pf Hh brdnd cnnvy 23

4.6 a pf brdnd cnnvy 24

4.7 a pf Nrrwnd cnnvy 25

SEction 5: mobilE connEctivity 26

5.1 ak trf r m Nwrk, t ornn cnr 26

5.2 ak trf r m Nwrk, t pr 27

5.3 cnnn sd & D cnn on m Nwrk 28

5.4 m trf grwh a orvd y ern 315.5 3g D trf prn m cnnd Dv ty

a orvd y ern 31

SEction 6: nEtwork outaGES and diSruPtionS 34

6.1 ey 34

6.2 ly 35

6.3 Jn 36

6.4 gr/arn 37

SEction 6: aPPEndix 38

SEction 7: EndnotES 39


5/40


ak y dd nwk v w h v n

nn n ny , ndn nnn d, k , nd nwk

nnvy/vy/ny , w n n dn W .eh q, ak h s h inn . th nd

d hd ak inn inn p dn h q

2011 k , dnd dn, nd nnvy, w

nd n n h d v . in ddn, h q nd nh

n h ipv4 xhn, ipv6 dn, nd v hh inn /

dn n n h q.

Attack Trafc

Dn h q 2011, ak vd

k nn 199 nq n

nd h wd. myn w h k

, nn 13% vd k

n . th und s nd twn hd h nd

nd hd vy, nn j

nd 20% vd k nd. ak

nnn w w hn n h h q

2010, wh h 10 n 65% vd

k , ndn k h y hv

n kn x h inn vy tor

n hdn h k.

Internet and Broadband Adoption

ak vd 5.2% n ( h h

q 2010) y n h n nq ipv4

dd nnn ak nwk, wn

v 584 n. nnn d

v, sh K dd h hh v

hh dnd (>5 m) nnvy, wh 60%

nnn ak d v 5 m. sh

K hvd h hh v nnn

d 14.4 m. Hn Kn nnd n

hvn h hh v k nnn d,

wh h -ip dd x nnn d

w vd h ip dd n

h ny. c n Jn nd sh K nnd

hd ny h n h nkn hh

v nd v k nnn d y y.

Mobile Connectivity

rvwn q vd k

knwn nwk, v k nn-

n nd y nn h q, wh

h 10 n nn j nd h-q

h vd k. th d w y

h v , nd p 445 nn

h nny hh n k

d h h n h 10. in h

q 2011, v d nnn d n

knwn vd nd h wd nd j

v 6 m dwn 163 k. av k nnn

d n vd nd h wd nd

22.7 m j v 1 m. lkn nn n-

n , n vn vd nd, n

v, hn n y (1 gb) nn

ak nh, wh n 77 ddn vd

dwndd hn 100 mb nn ak

nh dn h q. in ddn, d n

d d y en, d w 130%

yy wh n h q, nd nw hn

d h d v v .

exv sy


6/40


sectioN 1:sy

1.1 Attack Trafc, Top Originating Countries

Dn h q 2011, ak vd

k nn 199 nq n/

n, dwn 207 h nd 2010. a hwn

n 1, h q w v hn n h

h 10 k , wh mynkn n n h hy h ,

ind n h n h h q

2009, nd Hn Kn n h

n h hd q 2008. an h n/

n qny n n h 10 , h

und s nd twn w n hh

n k d h

q, wh r, chn, bz, rn, nd ind

w h n dn q-v-q.

th ddn n myn n h

k ny n, nd

d k n p 80 vd

y ak n y nd y mh. inny,

myn nd n 13% h

vd k n h q vn hhny 25 nq w d, nd h, v

45% h k d p 80. (cn h wh

h und s, wh 10% h vd k

nd n hnd d vy ny

ndv n nnn vy, d

y d k.) a W h h ip

dd k myn h w vd

nn h k nd n kn

n. nd z. h n

k h ip dd k w.1

an vd k nnn v,

w nd h ny h h vd k

h a p/on n, ny 30%

e, nd j v 20% h a.

ak nn dd n dyd h inn h

n k . bd n h d d y h n, ak

dny h n whh k n, w h d y h k. (p nwk y dn.) th

n vd nh n k , vd nd d y ak,

dn h q 2011.

Figure 1: Attack Trafc, Top Originating Countries/Regions

1 Myanmar 13% N/A

2 United States 10% 7.3%

3 Taiwan 9.1% 7.6%

4 Russia 7.7% 10%5 China 6.4% 7.4%

6 Brazil 5.5% 7.5%

7 India 3.8% 2.1%

8 Hong Kong 3.3% 0.3%

9 Romania 2.5% 2.6%

10 Italy 2.5% 3.6%

Other 36% 45%

Q4 10 %Q1 11 % TrafcCuntry/Regin

32

7

9

4

6

5

10

81


7/40


HTTPS/SSL 4.7%

Telnet 4.1%SSH 3.3%

Microsot SQL Server 1.7%

Microsot RPC 1.5%

STMP 1.6%

Versiera Agent Listener 1.5%

FTP 1.5%

Figure 2: Attack Trafc, Top Ports

445 Microsot-DS 34% 47%

80 WWW (HTTP) 11% 1.5%

443 HTTPS/SSL 4.7% 0.2%

23 Telnet 4.1% 11%

22 SSH 3.3% 6.2%

1433 Microsot SQL Server 1.7% 1.1%

25 SMTP 1.6% 0.4%

9050 Versiera Agent Listener 1.5% < 0.1%

21 FTP 1.5% 0.3%

135 Microsot-RPC 1.5% 1.1%

Various Other 35%

Q4 10 %Q1 11 % TrafcPrt UsePrt

Microsot-DS34%

Other35%

WWW11%

1.2 Attack Trafc, Top Ports

ak nnn n h 10

nnd d h nnn n n h

h q 2010, wh h 10 n

j 65% h vd k (dwn 72% n

h h q). p p 445 (m-

-Ds) dd ny 25% h q, nd

p 23 (tn) nd 22 (ssH) w nn n-

dn. Hwv, p 80 (WWW) w k

v v 7x hh hn h nd 2010, nd h

n k n p 443 (Https/ssl)

w v n v h q. a nd

v, ky h h wh n k n

p 80 nd p 443 d h k vd

nn myn nd Hn Kn. th n-

n dn k n p 445 nn nd

h h h d y h

cnk w, whh nw v h y d. a -

d2 y h cnk Wkn g n Jny

2011 d n y n cnk

nn wh , h vnn

dn n nw nd dn vn, hh

nd h cnk d n nywh

n 13 n h wd.

a hwn n 2, n ddn p 443

n n h , p 21 n h

h h q w. Wh y

nd h tn p (tp), v nn

y 3 n h h d y

n tjn w hddn n y

h n nn h h y. p 9050

n h h n h q,

ny n h nnd p 9415 h

d n h n h h q 2010. Wh

y nd4 V an ln (n n-

nwk nn & nn ),

h inn vy tor y p 9050

socKs xy .5 (th , n xyn

tcp nnn.) in vwn d y h 10

n/n, h ny h vd

k n h h und s, hh ny nd 5.8% h k vd

h und s. a h, y n k d

n h und s kn hd h k y v-

n h nnyy dd y nnn hh tor.

Whn vwn h d y k

nn n chn, nn n h h

h d (1433, 3389, 445) nd j

v 20% h q k vd nn

h ny, nd d y m w/

. p 22 (ssH) nd p 3306 (ysQl) nd

h 5 whn chn, y ndn h k

n h w hn y wh

wk wd h n xd h nn

w, n.


8/40


sectioN 2:inn pnn

2.1 Unique IPv4 Addresses

thh y-dyd v nwk, nd

y v h xy n n q

W nn h v n dy , ak

h nq vy n v inn nn

nd h wd. in h q 2011, v 584

n nq ip dd, 237 n/n,

nnd h ak nwk 5.2% ip d-

d hn n h h q 2010, nd 20%

hn n h q 2009. ahh w

hn h n nq ip dd, ak

v h w w v n n W .

th , n , ndvd y

nd y n ip dd ( n

ip dd), hy h W hh

w xy v. cnvy, ndvd

n hv ip dd d wh h,

d h nnd dv.

a hwn n 3, nn h 10 n -

nd nn wh h q, wh

cnd dn n h iy. a h

n n h w qy wh, wh iy

11% n dn h wy (nd n cnd

0.6% n, whh dd 11h y).

Yy wh h 10 n w n

w, wh d d n n n n

h n x n, whh nd n

n ny 7%. a hwn y-

v-y wh v 30% h q dn

2010, chn wh hv wd n

h q 2011, dn hy 27%.

cnnn n h 10 nnd

nn wh q, wh h n

nn ny 70% h vd ip dd.

in kn h n , h w 186 n/

n wh w hn n n nq ip dd

nnn ak n h q 2011, 134

wh w hn 100,000 nq ip dd, nd 31 wh

w hn 1,000 nq ip dd. th n

h hhd w hy q-v-q.

Figure 3: Unique IPv4 Addresses Seen By Akamai

Global 584,821,069 5.2% 20%

1 United States 142,605,731 3.9% 10%

2 China 73,587,347 9.4% 27%

3 Japan 41,233,145 4.3% 24%

4 Germany 34,785,032 2.8% 12%

5 France 24,010,722 3.9% 6.8%

6 South Korea 22,538,305 2.3% 35%

7 United Kingdom 22,333,025 0.7% 11%

8 Brazil 14,153,991 4.6% 24%

9 Italy 13,632,661 11% 28%

10 Spain 12,915,356 3.7% 15%

YY

Cange

QQ

Cange

Q1 11 Unique

IP Addresses

Cuntry/Regin

4

8

2

3

610

5

7

1

9

The number o unique IPv4 addresses seen by Akamai grew

rom 323 million in Q1 2008 to 584 million in Q1 2011

up 80% over the three year period.

DID YOU

KNOW?


9/40


2.2 IPv4 Address Space Exhaustion

on Jny 31, h inn and N

ahy (iaNa) dd w h nn

vn /8 k (n 16.8 n ip dd

k) ipv4 dd apNic, h rn

inn ry (rir) h a-p n.6 th

dn y d n vn h k n

y 3, whh h v nn /8 k ipv4

dd w dd nv h v

rir n k h. th n xhn h

n ipv4 dd hd n nd

q nd ndd nn

n h inn. Wh h xhn, h

rir nw h n ipv4 dd h n

nwk v vd nd whn

n. eh rir w y xhn

dd nd dn

nd q nw dd nd n

xn ipv4 dd . on h n d h

nw h nd mh, whn m w qd

y h an ry inn N

(ariN) n v h dd

d y nk vnd N

666,624 y ipv4 dd $7.5 n usD.7

Hwv, Jhn cn, ceo ariN, nd h a

n n h n--dn , w

-v q nd

ipv6 dd hn y y dd, nd h

w qky h ipv4 k.8

on a 15, apNic d n nn h

hd hd n /8 ipv4 dd k, nn

h nzn wh d s th ipv4

xhn n h a-p n.9 in h , h

nw xn apNic n hd ny

q nd v dn n x

1024 dd ( /22) h apNic ipv4 dd

, n .10 4 w

ndd n y 2011 11 y g Hn,

ch sn apNic, nd hw dd xh-

n d ( h d) h h rir. in -

12 h Nh an Nwk o g

(NaNog) n , Hn xnd h

h h hw h dd nh whn

h rir w dwn /8 y (whv h

y y ), nd h v y h h vn

w n h nh. (N h h h

h n n dd, nd n vn n

nd http://ipv4.potaroo.net.)

Figure 4: Projected RIR IPv4 Exhaustion Dates (source: https://reader009.{domain}/reader009/html5/0514/5af9645c39614/5af9646a8a9f2.jpg)

iaNa

Pro

bability(%)

apNic ripeNcc ariN lacNic ariNic

100...

60

50

40

30

20

10

0Jn 11 Jn 13Jn 12 Jn 14 Jn 15 Jn 16J 11 J 13J 12 J 14 J 15


10/40


2.3 IPv6 Adoption

5 hw ipv6 dn dn h q

n h n n13 W nkd y

ax. th h hw h n h

v v h ipv4 nd ipv6 d y

n n c nwk, n n wh

j n y p rh gn h unvy

pnnyvn.14 ipv6 hy h

d n y nn xy

0.25% hh h h h q jd

ddny h 3% n n d-y. in n -

xhn, p gn nd h h n n

hy w d g wh-n c

ipv6 nnvy , h c n

w h ny . h v ipv6.

(. h dn n d y b,

n wnd y g.) gn h nd

h h . hn w vd

h , hn ipv6 hy h nd h

q wd xy 0.3%, v

h n y n nnn h unvy

pnnyvn. th j n hy d wh-

n nwk vd hhh h

nd nnnvy h ipv6 inn

n g , h n qn h

nwk vd hy n

g v v ipv6.15

inn y a Nwk h dd ipv6

dn nd d v. lvn atlas, a

dd n nwk h v wh v

100 v vd dd 17 n, a h

xnd ipv6 wh nd v nd dy

h 16 xnn ndn. 6 d

n h hd y a h n ipv6 n x

atlas n nwk vd h n xn nv

ipv6 . th h hw ipv6 n v n

n-dn n h x vd, nd hh

ny hh h h h q, hw h

ipv6 v ny nd wn 0.1

nd 0.2 n inn . a n h h n

nd wh vn d y g17 nd ams-iX

(h ad inn exhn). Hwv, h dn

h vd hv n n hd, n whh-

h vd ipv6 v dy nv

h vd h n d h v ipv6

hh n vd h vy kn ipv6 v

nd h kn n v n ipv6 .

sectioN 2:inn pnn (nnd)

Figure 5: IPv6 Reachability Among Top 1 Million Web Sites

(source: http://v6monitor.kangaroo.comcast.net:8180/monitor/)

Jn11

feb11

mr11

apr11

s v h ipv4 nd ipv6

3.50

3.25

3.00

2.75

2.50

2.25

2.00

1.75

1.50

1.25

1.000.75

0.50

0.25

0.00

Reachability(%)

Figure 6: IPv6 Trafc as a Percentage o All Trafc in Six Selected

Carriers (Source: http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2011/04/six-months-

six-providers-and-ipv6/)

Traic(%)

0.35

0.30

0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

1/2/11

1/16/11

1/30/11

1/9/11

1/23/11

2/6/11

2/13/11


11/40


th d nd whn h n w d

dn h q 2011 hh ak -

y dyd v nwk nd nd n/

n h hd hn 25,000 nq ip dd

k q ak nwk dn h

q. (N h h 25,000 nq ip dd hhd

nn hn h 1,000 nq ip dd

hhd h w d n h w v h h

nw, hh hhd w n dd h

n n xy n wh h

n.) n n h ,

h dnd d ndd w nnn

hn 2 m, nd hh dnd nn-

n 5 m . in n h hh d-

nd nd dnd n, h nwnd

d ndd w nnn ak h

w hn 256 k. N h h n hn

fd w v h q(). (th

, Q4 v 50% nd Q1 v 51% wd

fd h 2% n.) a q-v-q

hn hwn whn h n v n w

n n hhh n nd, nd y-v-y

hn hwn n- nd.

a nd n v dn h State of the Internet

, n Jy 2010, h und s d cn-

n cn (cc) vd wkn dnn

dnd nd dwnd d 4 m.

W hv ndd nn h dnn dnd

whn h wh h cc. Hwv, ddn

h h hwn h h dnd h vyn

dnn h cndn -

n 5 m dwnd d,19 wh h en

cn v zn nd dwnd 30

m,20 wh k d 12 m h

a Nn bdnd Nwk.21 a h, w

v h dnn h dnn dnd whn

h 4 m wd und s-n,

nd w w n dn h .

a h qny HD-qy d n v ,

nd h nn h d n, nd

ky q v-nn n ndwdh.a nnn d 2 m y n

ndd-dnn tV-qy nn, nd 5 m

ndd-dnn DVD qy vd nn, wh b-

ry (1080) vd nn h x vd

40 m, dn h b-ry aQ.22 in ddn

vdn d n v nnn d, w nn

v k nnn d23 nd h

wd, ny/n, , nd y v.

th n vd nh n h k d h

n ky x h inn nnn.

ny, knwn nwk vd w

nyzd nd vwd n n h -

; nwk d h n vd h

d d h n h n n.

sectioN 3:ghy g

by v h xy n n q W nn h v

n dy hh y-dyd v nwk, ak h nq

v vy n h nnn d nd- y nd, nqny,n dnd dn nd h . b ak h nd

dd nwk d, dyn v whn d nwk, n dv

nn y nd nny h d, n n nzd

h y n w dyn n d n. n-

n n why h , ak How Will The Internet Scale? wh

18 h vd xnn www.akamai.com/whytheedge.


12/40


sectioN 3:ghy g(nnd)

3.1 Global Average Connection Speeds

a nn f n h h q 2010, h

v nnn d w hhy qy

wh n h q 2011, nn ny

10% j v 2 m, hwn n 7. in ddn

h n wh, n whn h

10 w qy wh 10% , wh ind

n h n, 16%. (ind n

wd d cnd h 10 n h

q, n dwn wh .) gy, v

40 n/n w v nnn d

n y 10% n h q. ony h

n/n whn h 10 w qy dn,

whh w y d. a h n/-

n n h 10, w h und s (n

nh), nnd nn v nnn

d h xdd h hh dnd hhd

5 m.

th v nnn d w vy hhy wh

y-v-y w, nn 23%. Yy wh 20%

w n n h h n (sh K,

h Nhnd, nd b), nd wh n x 10%

w n n nh h n n h 10

(czh r, swznd, nd ind), w n h

und s. gy, y-v-y n w vd

n v 110 n/n, wh ny 100 n

d-d n n, wh dzn w nn

wh n x 100%. Hwv, h dzn,

h und a e hd h hh v nnn

d 3.9 m, vn nn n n v n-

nn d n q nn n hn.

Dn h q, 36 n/n hd v

nnn d 1 m . th w h

w ly, 328 K. N h h h qn

25,000 nq ip dd qy nn n sn

3 h hd h v h, dn xy 40

ddn n ndn, nd xdn n-

n nnn d d h c nd my.

Figure 7: Average Measured Connection Speed by Country/Region

Global 2.1 9.7% 23%1 South Korea 14.4 5.0% 20%

2 Hong Kong 9.2 -1.7% 2.1%

3 Japan 8.1 -2.7% 2.7%

4 Netherlands 7.5 7.6% 25%

5 Romania 6.6 -4.9% 4.9%

6 Czech Republic 6.5 14% 19%

7 Latvia 6.3 6.7% 0.4%

8 Switzerland 6.2 10% 17%

9 Belgium 6.1 11% 29%

10 Ireland 5.6 16% 14%

14 United States 5.3 4.7% 14%

YY CangeQQ CangeQ111 Avg. MbpsCuntry/Regin

14

7

5

3

2

1

6

8

10

9 4


13/40


3.2 Global Average Connection Speeds,

City View

a w hv dn n v dn h State of

the Internet, n xnn v d

nnn d y v, w hv d

nq ip dd n (50,000 n y

ak n h q 2011) nd d n-

n (vn d knwn d nwk).

in ddn, wh h h d d n sn

3 h , knwn nwk

h n vd w.

a hwn n 8, Jn tk, sh,

nd Knw d h n h q, wh v nnn d 13.2 m,

12.9 m, nd 12.2 m vy. indn h

h, 13 hvd v nnn d n

x 10 m. th y n e w ly,

Nwy, 8.1 m, nd rvd, cn hd h

hh v nnn d n Nh a,

7.8 m.

cnnn h nd n n h v y,

n a nnd dn h 100 n h

q, hdn w-hd h n h . th

ndd 61 n Jn, v n sh K, nd Hn

Kn. twny-n Nh a d h ,

ndn 18 h und s nd 3 cnd.

e n n nd dzn n

n (rn w h ny en ny wh

hn n n h nd h.)

in vwn h hn 800

h qd nn n h n, h

n h h ndd p, sh a (a),

wh n v nnn d 1.5 m; rvwd,

Nw sh W, a (on) wh n v n-

nn d 5.9 m; nd mn, ann (sh

a) wh n v nnn d 3.4 m.

In Europe, the largest increase in average connection speed

was seen in Georgia, which more than tripled over the lastthree years.

Chinas average connection speed has grown by nearly hal

since Q1 2008, and exceeded 1 Mbps or the frst time in

Q1 2011.

Canadas average connection speed grew over the last three

years by nearly 70%, double the growth rate o 35% seen

in the United States. Average connection speeds in Chile, Colombia, and Paraguay

more than doubled rom Q1 2008 to Q1 2011.

DID YOU

KNOW?


14/40



Figure 8: Average Connection Speed, Top Global Cities

1 Japan Tokai 13.2

2 Japan Shimotsuma 12.93 Japan Kanagawa 12.2

4 South Korea Seocho 12.1

5 Japan Asahi 11.9

6 Japan Yokohama 11.7

7 Japan Urawa 11.4

8 South Korea Ilsan 11.3

9 Japan Nagano 11.2

10 Japan Hiroshima 11.2

11 Japan Tochigi 10.9

12 Japan Shizuoka 10.7

13 Japan Nagoya 10.4

14 Japan Ibaraki 9.9

15 Japan Toyonaka 9.9

16 Japan Chiba 9.7

17 Japan Giu 9.6

18 Japan Marunouchi 9.6

19 Japan Kyoto 9.5

20 Japan Kobe 9.5

21 Japan Hyogo 9.3

22 Japan Nara 9.3

23 Japan Sendai 9.1

24 Japan Wakayama 9.0

25 South Korea Seoul 8.8

26 Japan Osaka 8.7

27 Japan Yokkaichi 8.6

28 Japan Fukuoka 8.6

29 Hong Kong Hong Kong 8.6

30 Japan Otsu 8.6

31 Japan Fukui 8.3

32 Japan Hakodate 8.2

33 Norway Lyse 8.1

34 Japan Fukushima 8.1

35 Japan Niigata 8.1

36 Japan Niho 8.0

37 Japan Matsuyama 8.0

38 Japan Tokushima 7.9

39 United States Riverside, CA 7.8

40 United States Staten Island, NY 7.841 South Korea Yongsan 7.8

42 United States San Jose, CA 7.8

43 Romania Constanta 7.7

44 Japan Tokyo 7.7

45 Japan Kochi 7.7

46 Japan Hamamatsu 7.7

47 Japan Kanazawa 7.6

48 Japan Hodogaya 7.6

49 Canada Oakville, ON 7.6

50 Japan Soka 7.6

51 Japan Yosida 7.5

52 Japan Okayama 7.553 Japan Mito 7.5

54 Japan Kumamoto 7.4

55 Japan Yamagata 7.4

56 Japan Yamaguchi 7.4

57 United States Fremont, CA 7.4

58 Czech Republic Brno 7.4

59 Netherlands Amsterdam 7.3

60 Japan Utsunomiya 7.2

61 Japan Saga 7.2

62 United States Boston Metro, MA 7.1

63 Japan Miyazaki 7.1

64 Japan Kou 7.1

65 Portugal Porto 7.0

66 Romania Timisoara 7.0

67 Japan Kokuryo 7.0

68 Japan Tottori 7.0

69 Japan Kagoshima 6.9

70 Romania Iasi 6.9

71 Canada Victoria, BC 6.9

72 Spain Valencia 6.8

73 United States Jersey City, NJ 6.8

74 Belgium Antwerp 6.7

75 United States Marietta, GA 6.7

76 United States Anaheim, CA 6.7

77 Japan Toyama 6.7

78 United States Traverse City, MI 6.6

79 Japan Nagasaki 6.6

80 United States Hollywood, FL 6.6

81 United States Spartanburg, SC 6.6

82 United States Santa Barbara, CA 6.6

83 United States Hayward, CA 6.5

84 United States San Mateo, CA 6.5

85 Japan Oita 6.5

86 Japan Iwaki 6.5

87 United States Oakland, CA 6.5

88 Canada Mississauga, ON 6.4

89 United States Fond Du Lac, WI 6.4

90 United States Union, NJ 6.491 Japan Okidate 6.3

92 Japan Naha 6.3

93 Latvia Riga 6.3

94 Japan Akita 6.3

95 Austria Salzburg 6.3

96 South Korea Taegu 6.3

97 Switzerland Zurich 6.3

98 Japan Kagawa 6.3

99 United States Trenton, NJ 6.3

100 Japan Sapporo 6.2

Q1 11 Avg. Mbps Q1 11 Avg. MbpsCity CityCuntry/Regin Cuntry/Regin


15/40


3.3 Global Average Peak Connection Speeds

th v k nnn d n

n v h x d nnn d

h nq ip dd n y ak

hy. th v d n d

h nnv x

d nnn d. in n h v

d nnn d, h v k nnn

d nv inn nnn

y. (th nd h n -d d

n hn h y nd whn

h nwk y vd, n d dv dwn-

d d .) N h d

knwn nwk h n vd

h d h .

a hwn n 9, h v k nnn

d jd v 10 m h , wn

n v 20% h nd 2010, nd n vn

v 65% h nnn 2010. md-

wh w n h h 10 n/

n, nd h und s, whh d hnh.

sh K, lv, nd b ddd hn

10% q-v-q. Jn nd h und a

e w h ny w n h w qy

dn, hh nh nn n. lkn

y-v-y hn, h ny 4x wh n

n h und a e w y h nn,

hh h en n w 50% . Hn

Kn, rn, nd h und s w v k

nnn d hn 30% hh hn n h

q y .

Hn Kn nd h ny/n wh h

hh v k nnn d, ndn j hy

40 m. sh K nd rn hd v

k nnn d v 30 m. th nn

n n h 10, w h und s, w

k d v 20 m n h q. in ddn

h d, v h n ( n e cn-

d) hd v k nnn d v 20 m,

wh n ddn 44 xdd 10 m. und h nw

qn dn, h ny wh h w v-

k nnn d w ly, j 1226 k.

Global 10.6 20% 65%

1 Hong Kong 39.5 4.2% 34%

2 South Korea 36.3 12% 11%

3 Romania 32.7 3.3% 31%

4 Japan 29.9 -1.8% 16%

5 United Arab Emirates 25.9 -4.8% 394%

6 Portugal 24.9 8.7% 56%

7 Belgium 24.7 8.1% 50%

8 Latvia 24.4 11% 29%

9 Bulgaria 22.4 18% 45%

10 Netherlands 22.0 7.1% 52%

13 United States 21.2 4.3% 31%

YY CangeQQ CangeQ1 11 Peak MbpsCuntry/Regin

13

8

3

4

1

2

7

6

9 5

Figure 9: Average Peak Connection Speed by Country/Region

10


16/40



3.4 Global Average Peak Connection

Speeds, City View

a w hv dn n v dn h State

of the Internet, n xnn v d

nnn d y v, w hv d

nq ip dd n (50,000 n y

ak n h q 2011) nd d n-

n (vn d knwn d nwk).

in ddn, wh h h d d n sn

3 h , knwn nwk

h n vd w.

a hwn n 10, nn h 10 wh h

hh v nnn d w n Jn.sh, Jn w h ny y wh n v

k nnn d n x 50 m, hh

tk, Jn h y j 130 k. indn sh-

, 16 hd v k nnn d

v 40 m. an ddn 37 hd v

k nnn d n x 30 m, wh

h nn 47 w v 20 m.

c n a n n dnd h , wh

h 100 ndn Hn Kn, D, 54

n Jn, nd 10 n sh K. th en y

nd cnn, rn (whh ndd h

10), nd w jnd y x h en ,

ndn n ddn h rn, w

n h p, Nwy, nd h czh r.

in Nh a, 27 d h 100 , ndn

25 h und s nd w cnd.

in kn h v 800 h

qd nn, h n n h -

h ndd cn, m (a) wh n

v k nnn d 10.4 m; cn,

a (on) wh n v k nnn d

22.5 m; nd mn, ann (sh a)

wh n v k nnn d 20.6 m.

In Europe, the largest increase (over 300%) in average

peak connection speeds rom Q1 2008 to Q 2011was

seen in Bulgaria and Moldova.

Average peak connection speeds in Australia and New

Zealand have more than doubled over the last three years.

While the average peak connection speed in the United

States increased 95% rom Q1 2008 to Q1 2011, Mexicos

average peak connection speed grew 166% over the

same period. Average peak connection speeds in Argentina, Brazil,

Chile, Colombia, Paraguay, and Uruguay more than

doubled rom Q1 2008 to Q1 2011.

DID YOU

KNOW?


17/40


Figure 10: Average Peak Connection Speed, Top Global Cities

1 Japan Shimotsuma 50.2

2 Japan Tokai 49.93 Japan Kanagawa 48.5



6 Japan Urawa 47.1



9 Japan Nagano 43.7

10 Romania Constanta 43.0

11 Japan Soka 42.4

12 Japan Chiba 42.4

13 Japan Asahi 41.9

14 Japan Shizuoka 40.2

15 Romania Iasi 40.0

16 United States North Bergen, NJ 40.0

17 South Korea Taejon 39.5


19 Romania Timisoara 38.7

20 Japan Kokuryo 38.3


22 Japan Ibaraki 37.6

23 Hong Kong Hong Kong 37.5

24 Japan Nagoya 37.4

25 Japan Utsunomiya 37.0


27 Japan Mito 35.2

28 United States Staten Island, NY 35.0

29 Japan Fukuoka 34.8

30 Japan Sendai 34.8

31 Japan Kyoto 34.5

32 South Korea Taegu 34.4

33 Japan Kobe 34.3

34 Japan Giu 34.2

35 Japan Niigata 32.9

36 Japan Yosida 32.8

37 South Korea Kimchon 32.5

38 Japan Yokkaichi 32.4

39 Japan Kou 32.3

40 United States Van Nuys, CA 32.141 Japan Nara 32.0

42 Japan Hakodate 31.9

43 South Korea Seoul 31.6

44 Japan Niho 31.5

45 Japan Otsu 31.3

46 Japan Fukui 31.1

47 Portugal Porto 31.1

48 Japan Osaka 30.9

49 Japan Wakayama 30.6

50 Japan Fukushima 30.4

51 United States Riverside, CA 30.4

52 Japan Yamagata 30.353 Japan Hamamatsu 30.1

54 South Korea Suwon 29.9

55 Romania Bucharest 29.8

56 South Korea Yongsan 29.6

57 Japan Kanazawa 29.6

58 Japan Okidate 29.5

59 Norway Lyse 29.4

60 United States Hayward, CA 29.3

61 South Korea Sangamdong 29.1

62 Japan Matsuyama 29.1

63 Japan Iwaki 28.8

64 United States San Mateo, CA 28.8

65 United States Hollywood, FL 28.6

66 South Korea Anyang 28.3

67 United States Arvada, CO 28.2

68 Japan Okayama 28.1

69 Japan Yamaguchi 28.0

70 Japan Tokushima 27.7

71 Japan Tokyo 27.7

72 United States Jersey City, NJ 27.7

73 United States Waco, TX 27.6

74 United States Boston Metro, MA 27.6

75 Czech Republic Brno 27.5

76 United States Tallahassee, FL 27.4

77 United States Fremont, CA 27.4

78 United States Marietta, GA 27.4

79 Japan Sapporo 27.4

80 United States Ogden, UT 27.3

81 Japan Akita 27.1

82 Japan Hyogo 27.0

83 United States Canton, OH 27.0

84 Japan Toyonaka 27.0

85 United States Oakland, CA 26.8

86 Japan Kochi 26.8

87 Japan Kumamoto 26.7

88 United States Bellevue, WA 26.6

89 United States Santa Barbara, CA 26.5

90 United States Federal Way, WA 26.491 United States Spartanburg, SC 26.3

92 United States Mishawaka, IN 26.2

93 Japan Morioka 26.2

94 Canada Mississauga, ON 26.1

95 UAE Dubai 26.0

96 United States Vancouver, WA 26.0

97 United States Saint Paul, MN 25.7

98 United States Union, NJ 25.7

99 Canada Kelowna, BC 25.6

100 Japan Toyama 25.4

Q1 11 Peak Mbps Q1 11 Peak MbpsCity CityCuntry/Regin Cuntry/Regin


18/40


3.5 Global High Broadband Connectivity

in h q 2011, hh dnd

dn nd x n q-v-q-

, wh 25% nnn ak n

d 5 m . a hwn n 11, sh

K nd h , n 2011 wh hh

dnd dn v 60% -- hh h

h q, dwn 10% h

2010. Qy wh n h n/n

n h 10 nd n 26% wh n h

czh r -1% n n h h Nh-

nd nd lv. an h 10 n/n,

ny Hn Kn, Jn, nd rn w q-v-

q dn, hh nnd hh dnd

dn v v 50%. th und s, nkd

wh y, w d n 9%

h q, ndn h q 2011

hh dnd dn 39%.

on y-v-y , hh dnd

dn jd 15%, nd yy wh w n

n h h 10 n/n, w n

h und s. ony sh K nd Jn dnd

y-v-y, wh wh n h h h

n h 10 nd nn 44% n

n b, dwn 5.4% n

n Dnk. a h h wd, 13 n

w hh dnd dn hn d

y-v-y, wh h und a e wn

900% ( 26% dn), nd ann nn v

500% ( nn 3.6% dn ).

lkn hh dnd dn n ,

h q w x n/n wh hn

h h nnn ak d hn

5 m h n/n n h

q. bynd h, h w n ddn 19 n-

/n (nn wh h h q 2010)

wh hn q h nnn w hh

dnd , nd 17 (dwn 21 n h h

q 2010) wh n n n nnn w

hn 5 m. o h 55 h h qd

nn n h n, chn nd ind w h ny

w wh hh dnd dn w 1%

hy hvd 0.5% nd 0.4% dn vy.

exnn h n nnn ak

d v 10 m, w nd h 6.7% nn-

n y xdd h . sh K, Jn, nd

Hn Kn w h ny h n/n wh

hn q h nnn n x 10 m,

wh dn 31%, 26%, nd 26% vy.

v h n, n e, hd hn 10% nnn ak d v 10 m. o

h n h qd nn, tky (0.6%),

mx (0.3%), nd chn (0.1%) w h ny h

wh dn 10 m nnvy w 1%.


Figure 11: High Broadband Connectivity, Fastest Countries/Regions

Global 25% 5.9% 15%

1 South Korea 60% 17% -10%

2 Netherlands 56% 0.6% 29%

3 Hong Kong 55% -1.4% 18%

4 Japan 55% -4.9% -7.7%

5 Belgium 52% 11% 44%

6 Romania 51% -1.6% 6.5%

7 Czech Republic 48% 26% 38%

8 Latvia 44% 0.5% 7.3%

9 Canada 44% 5.2% 29%

10 Denmark 43% 7.2% 5.4%

12 United States 39% 8.8% 22%

YY CangeQQ Cange% Abve 5 MbpsCuntry/Regin

12

9

8

6

4

3

1

2

5

10

7


19/40


Figure 12: Broadband Connectivity, Fast Countries/Regions

Global 62% 2.0% 9.5%

1 Bulgaria 95% 4.7% 6.6%

2 Czech Republic 94% 3.3% 9.5%

3 Switzerland 93% 1.1% 1.8%

4 Romania 93% 0.7% 9.9%

5 Luxembourg 92% 7.0% 33%

6 Hong Kong 92% -1.6% -0.1%

7 Hungary 91% 3.6% 16%

8 Germany 91% 3.7% 12%

9 Netherlands 91% 1.0% 8.1%

10 Belgium 90% 0.1% -1.1%

32 United States 77% 2.9% 8.2%

YY CangeQQ Cange% Abve 2 MbpsCuntry/Regin

32

4

16

5

10

73

89 2

3.6 Global Broadband Connectivity

in h q 2011, dnd dn

nnd n hy, nn 2% h nd

2010, h 62%. a hwn n 12, h

n/n n h 10 hd 90% h

nnn ak n d 2

m n h q. inny, e xy

w nd n h n wh h hh

v dnd dn, hdn nn h 10

nn nnvy nhd sh K nd

Jn nk hnh (87%) nd wny-nnh (79%) -

y, ky ndn h wh hy hv y n v

hh dnd dn (nnn v 5 m),

h n n nnn w

2 m h d h h 10 h .

Nn h 10 n/n, w h und

s, w nd dnd dn q-

v-q Hn Kn w h ny hy n

h 10 qy dn. th n w

vy d, wh lx 7% wh h -

h . gy, h n (ed, tky,

nd s) hn dd h v dnd

dn h h q 2010.

on y-v-y , dnd dn

w 9.5%, wh v h n n h

czh r nd rn. lx hd, nd

wy, h yy n h 10 n/

n, wn 33%. a j nd 2%, swznd

hd h w yy n n h 10.

s h qy hn, Hn Kn dnd

vy hy (dwn 0.1%), nd b jnd w,

n n 1.1%. gy, 17 n hn

dd h v dnd dn d

h 2010, v 2000% n n

on 113% wh n h ukn. (Hwv, j v

30,000 dnd ip dd w n y ak

on n h q, d j v 2 n

h ukn, h v wh v

ndd dny.)

in h q 2011, 11 n/n (

nn n h h q 2010) w dnd d-

n v 90% . anh 42 n/n

(dwn 53 n h q) hd h h

nnn ak 2 m , 14 ddn

n/n hd dnd dn 25%,

nd nh 12 n/n hd n n n

nnn ak 2 m . (th n

w hn n n q d h nw nq

ip dd n hhd nn.) o h n/

n h qd nn, Vnz hd h w-

v dnd dn, 1.7%.


20/40



Figure 13: Narrowband Connectivity, Slowest Countries/Regions

Global 3.3% -15% -36%

1 Lebanon 61% -7.7% -11%

2 Uzbekistan 54% -19% -36%

3 Libya 52% 252% -37%

4 Bolivia 51% -14% -25%

5 Nigeria 40% -8.1% -23%

6 Iran 38% -2.4% -17%

7 Indonesia 38% -13% 69%

8 Nepal 36% -40% -36%

9 India 35% 0.1% 32%

10 Syria 20% -22% -5.1%

28 United States 2.0% -20% -25%

YYCange

QQCange

% Bew256 kbps

Cuntry/Regin

28

1

3

5 6

74

102

8

9

3.7 Global Narrowband Connectivity

th h hn n h hhd nn

h n nd n h n, h

h hn vdn h nw-

nd , h n h hv n n

n h 10 h h y, n n,

n n qy nn. rd w n h

h n n h 10 dn hn hv n

n vy, nd h h und s nk

nny hh, d w n/n

n n h v .

a hwn n 13, h v nwnd

dn dnd ny n h q 2011,wh 3.3% nnn ak d w

256 k. th dn v 15% w hn h

nd 2010 nd 36% w hn h h

y. an h n n n h 10

n h q 2011, w w qy

dn. Wh ind 0.1% n n nwnd

dn n, n nn, h 252%

n n ly n h q ny

nn. Hwv, w v h h j d

ny d x nn d yh vnn-d -dy inn hdwn,

dn whh n nd h ny w

vy d. (th vd n d n

sn 6.2 h .)

y-v-y v, ny indn nd ind

w nd v nwnd dn, nd h v

wh y nn h n. thh

nwnd dn v w 69% y-v-y n

indn, h h vnn h kn

vy v h nnvy n whn h ny,

nn h Jk Dn mnn bdnd

n a 14, 2011.24 th dn k n h n-

dnd-nd v dy nd nny

30% indnn y y 2014 hh nw

w nwk hn, d dnd-

nnd dv, h n nn -

kn n, nd /v nh. ind

nnn k v v d-

nd nnvy hh h ny, wh h d

nn usD $13 n nn dnd n-

wk,25 nndd nn , wn nd v wh

n hn 500 n w h d

n y 2012 nd 2013. phd 26 nd

h h nwk wd n nnn

d 10 m n 63 h ny n

nd y 2014, wh d 4 m

wd d n 352 ddn .

o h n/n h qd nn,

18 dd nwnd dn v w h

3.3% n h q 2011. H h w

nwnd dn w 1%, wh n dn h

w v, 0.3%.


21/40


th nd h h a p n d n h

d d sn 3 nd j h hhd nd dd

whn h n. (th d h n nd nnndnd n nwk n h a p n, d n n

y ak eds27 n .)

sectioN 4:ghy a p rn

4.1 Asia Pacifc Average Connection Speeds

in h a p n, sh K nnd hv

h hh v nnn d, wd n

y Hn Kn nd Jn. a hwn n 14, h

q 2011 w vy d n h

n/n d, nn h w q-v-

q vn n v nnn d, wh h n d-d n n.

Hn Kn nd Jn w y nn qy

dn, hh twn 13% nn.

Y-v-y nd w ny v, wh n

h wv d n xnn yy wh

n v nnn d. th n n

h d n w n n sn, 53%,

hh h 46% n n n my nd chn

w v w. thnd v nnn

d y vd h q 2010, wh

twn nd ind h w n dn n h v

nnn d.

in h q 2011, h n/n

hd v nnn d h xdd h hh

dnd (5 m) hhd, wh n ddn v

hd v nnn d h xdd h d-

nd (2 m) hhd. chn nd ind nn

h w h d n, wh ind n

h 1 m.

Figure 14: Average Measured Connection Speed by Country/Region

3842

100

109

3

1

28

9147

2773

1 South Korea 14.4 5.0% 20%

2 Hong Kong 9.2 -1.7% 2.1%

3 Japan 8.1 -2.7% 2.7%

27 Singapore 4.2 35% 53%

28 Taiwan 4.1 -13% -4.3%

38 New Zealand 3.5 1.5% 20%

42 Australia 3.4 14% 29%

47 Thailand 2.9 5.7% 0.1%

73 Malaysia 1.6 18% 46%

91 Philippines 1.1 15% 28%

100 China 1.0 6.3% 46%

109 India 0.8 0.7% -1.1%

YYCange

QQCange

Q1 11Avg. Mbps

Cuntry/ReginGbaRank

2


22/40


sectioN 4:ghy a p rn(nnd)

4.2 Asia Pacifc Average Connection Speeds,

City View

a wh h g av cnnn sd, cy

Vw nd n sn 3.2, nnn knwn

d nd nwk w vd h

ndyn d h , nd h 50,000 nq

ip dd w d h vw w.

in vwn h 10 n h a p n

wh h hh v nnn d, hwn

n 15, w h n Jn dn h ,

kn h h 10 . th w sh Kn

n h , sh nd in, h w w v-

nnn d hn n h h q 2010, dd h h sh Kn n h 10

q, whh d h d h h

q. thh tk, Jn w q-v-q

n j 1 m, vn n ,

h h Jn n h 10 w nn

qy dn.

v, h jy h

w n h a p n, wh h 100

ndn 61 n Jn, v n sh K, nd Hn

Kn. addny, h v 800 h q-d nn n h ndd n a,

sn, twn, Nw Znd, thnd, my,

chn, ind, nd h phn.

4.3 Asia Pacifc Average Peak Connection Speeds

cnn wh h h q 2010, Hn Kn

nnd hv h hh v k nnn d

h a p n, n j hy 40 m,

hwn n 16. sh K ndd h qy

n q, wn 12% j v 36 m n

h q. o h wv n/n vyd

h , nn w q-v-q n n v

k nnn d, 2.4% wh n ind d

25% n n sn. o h h n/n h

w qy dn, w y d, h n

twn j nd 5%.

Yy hn h wv vyd n/nw vy v, wh n y-v-y wh. th

n w n n sn, wh h v

nnn d w 73% hh hn n h d

y . Yy wh 40% w n n

a, my, h phn, nd chn. th

y-v-y hn w n n thnd, whh w

6.3% h q 2010.

Wh h qy wh n h vyd

n/n, nd h d yy wh n

h, h nd wd nd h, h , inn nnvy n h a p n

nn v. th h d y nd

vd h n whn h a p

n w.

1 Japan Tokai 13.2


3 Japan Kanagawa 12.2


5 Japan Asahi 11.9


7 Japan Urawa 11.4


9 Japan Nagano 11.2


City YY CangeCuntry/ReginGbaRank

Figure 15: Average Measured Connection Speed

by Country/Region


23/40


4.4 Asia Pacifc Average Peak Connection

Speeds, City View

in h q 2011, h 10 a p

wh h hh v k nnn d w

d n Jn, hwn n 17.

y sh ddd v 3 m q-v-q-

dv n v k d v 50 m,

wh h h n h 10 ddd n

w m h q w, nd nd

n v k d n x 40 m. th sh

Kn y wh h hh v k nnn

d w tjn, 39.5 m, wh Hn Kn

n 37.5 m.

v, h jy h

w n h a p n, wh h 100

ndn 54 n Jn, n n sh K, nd

Hn Kn. addny, h v 800

h qd nn n h ndd

n a, sn, twn, Nw Znd, thnd,

my, chn, ind, nd h phn.

4.5 Asia Pacifc High Broadband Connectivity

in h q 2011, h h wv ap n/n vyd w hh v hh

dnd dn hn n h h q 2010,

hwn n 18. t-nkn sh K hvd

hh dnd dn 60%, hh 17%

q-v-q wh d n n h

62% n n n sn, nd h wh 30%

n n a, my, nd chn. Hwv,

vn wh h 49% n, hh dnd dn n

chn xy w, xy 0.5%. (D

h hhd nn n hnd 25,000nq ip dd vn , h phn dd

n qy nkd y. W nkd, hwv,

wd d hd h ind nd chn.)

Figure 16: Average Peak Connection Speed by Country/Region

1 Hong Kong 39.5 4.2% 34%2 South Korea 36.3 12% 11%

4 Japan 29.9 -1.8% 16%

17 Singapore 19.3 25% 73%

22 Taiwan 18.3 -4.8% 31%

37 Australia 14.7 17% 51%

41 Thailand 14.0 6.5% 6.3%

45 New Zealand 13.7 -2.6% 28%

68 Malaysia 8.9 10% 47%

74 Philippines 8.1 15% 41%

108 India 5.2 2.4% 11%

119 China 4.1 9.9% 49%

YYCange

QQCange

Q1 11Peak Mbps

Cuntry/ReginGbaRank

4537

119

108

4

2

1

22

41

1768

74

Figure 17: Average Peak Connection Speed, Top

Asia Pacifc Cities by Speed


2 Japan Tokai 49.9

3 Japan Kanagawa 48.5


5 Japan Yokohama 47.86 Japan Urawa 47.1



9 Japan Nagano 43.7

10 Japan Soka 42.4

Q1 11 Peak MbpsCuntry/Regin City


24/40


sectioN 4:ghy a p rn(nnd)

Wh Hn Kn nd Jn w hh dnd d-

n dn q-v-q, h dn

h n, nd h hn

n nh nn. Hwv, twn

15% qy nxd (y vn nn

wh n h q), nd ind h dn

nn w wh j 0.4% hh dnd d-

n, h n h nd h n h.

Hwv, hhhd n sn 3.7, h indn vn-

n h nzd h vy h n, nd w

wkn dd .

on y-v-y , h h wv a p

n/n vyd w hh v dnd

dn hn n h d y . sn

w hh dnd dn v 142% y-v-

y, wh my nd chn h nd hn

200%. th v yy wh n n h h n-

/n, wh n q , w vy n.

an h n/n h w dnn v

hh dnd dn, h w n

n ind, whh dd 29% y-v-y. a nd

v, h nn, hh dnd dn

whn h ny n vn h n.

4.6 Asia Pacifc Broadband Connectivity

a 19 , dnd dn v

h vyd a p n/n nnd

y n n h q 2011, wh h

h n/n n hn h h n-

nn ak d 2 m . o h

nn n, ny chn nd ind w d-

nd dn w 10% -- h n vn

h q, whn n w h

v. Qy hn w xd, hwv, wh ny

vn h n/n n qy v-

n. th ndd ind, whh j h hn

5% dnd dn, d qy n j

v 8%. inny, sh K dnd dn

nd f d h nd 2010.

oh hn h y-v-y n n Hn Kn,

sh K, nd Jn, yy wh n dnd d-

n w q n h h a p n/

n. adn v n my ny d n h

nnn 2010, wh chn w n v 178%

w. th nn n/n nd n d-

d n n, wh h w wh n

n twn, 13%.

Figure 18: High Broadband Connectivity, Fastest Asia Pacifc Countries/Regions

1 South Korea 60 17% -10%

3 Hong Kong 55 -1.4% 18%

4 Japan 55 -4.9% -7.7%

19 Singapore 28 62% 142%

26 Taiwan 24 -15% 17%

35 Australia 16 30% 52%

37 New Zealand 15 12% 85%

45 Thailand 4.0 0.6% -8.0%

49 Malaysia 2.4 31% 259%

54 China 0.5 49% 212%

55 India 0.4 -2.2% -29%

Philippines 0.5 19% 11%

YYCange

QQCange

% Abve5 Mbps

Cuntry/ReginGbaRank

3735

54

55

4

1

3

26

45

1949


25/40


Figure 19: Broadband Connectivity, Fast Asia Pacifc Countries/Regions

6 Hong Kong 92 -1.6% -0.1%

18 South Korea 87 -5.1%

29 Japan 79 -2.2% -10%

34 Taiwan 75 -4.5% 13%

35 New Zealand 74 -3.4% 14%

39 Singapore 69 27% 33%

50 Thailand 62 15% 14%

52 Australia 57 9.7% 20%

74 Malaysia 15 51% 292%

79 Philippines 10 30% 80%

80 China 9.3 15% 178%

82 India 4.9 8.2% 18%

YYCange

QQCange

% Abve2 Mbps

Cuntry/ReginGbaRank

3552

80

82

29

18

6

34

7950

3974

Figure 20: Narrowband Connectivity, Slowest Asia Pacifc Countries/Regions

9 India 35 0.1% 32%

17 China 7.9 -18% -55%21 New Zealand 4.5 -13% -30%

24 Philippines 3.4 -44% -55%

25 Malaysia 2.7 -43% -63%

27 Australia 2.2 -45% -60%

29 Thailand 1.9 -55% -69%

33 Japan 1.1 -21% -26%

39 South Korea 0.5 44% 95%

50 Taiwan 0.3 -50% -77%

81 Hong Kong 0.3 -26% -37%

85 Singapore 0.5 -96% -85%

YYCange

QQCange

% Bew256 Kbps

Cuntry/ReginGbaRank

2127

17

9

33

39

81

50

2429

8525

4.7 Asia Pacifc Narrowband Connectivity

20 h, y nd , h n n

n h h q 2010 nwnd dn

n a p n/n hv n vd,

wh n h wv a p n/n d-

n h n nnn ak d

w 256 k n h q 2011. ind n

h a p ny wh h hh v nw-

nd dn, 35%, whh nd y nh

n n h q. sh K 44% n

n, hh wh n dn v ny 0.5%, nd

w hn 100,000 nq ip dd n h -

( d h n n v h

h vyd n), hn n nnn

d ip dd n n y nd

n hn. i h sn

xnn nn fn, nn

160% n h h q 2010, nd hn hddn

ny nwnd nnn n h q.

s h qy hn, ind nd sh K

w h ny w a p n yy

wh w. Wh h n nnn

ak sh K hv ny dd

v h y, h v ny w hh hn n nn nn. Hwv, wh

ind y hd y-v-y, h vy

nnd nn dnd nwk nv y

ndd, nd w hy dv nwnd dn

v dwn v h n y.


26/40


27/40


28/40


sectioN 5:m cnnvy (nnd)

5.3 Connection Speeds and Data Consumption

on Mobile Networks

in h q 2011, vd n pnd

(pl-4) w h vd wh h hh v nn-

n d, j v 6.1 m, n h

vd n h h q 2010 (gr-1) dwn

nd . rd w n h vd n b

(be-3) d hvn n v nnn d

v 15 m, whh hd n .

Hwv, w v h h vd y vn

hn wy h h wd y

nfn h ; w w nd vn h -

vd h ndyn d n dn h

. in vwn h v nnn d h

105 vd d n 23, xdn h n-

nd bn vd, w nd h pl-4 w h ny

vd wh n v nnn d n h hh

dnd (>5 m) n, wh 24 vd

hd v nnn d n h dnd (>2

m) n. an ddn 45 vd hd v-

nnn d 1 m . th

vd wh h w v nnn d n

h q nnd sK-1, hh v

nnn d w 163 k, 134 kn h q.

in vwn qy hn, h nn

h d vd w dn v nn-

n d, hh gr-2 , wn v-

nnn d ny 97%. ony h d

vd (gr-2, es-1, iD-1, uY-1) nd h v

nnn d y 50% q-v-q.

v vd dd v nnn d wh

nd 1%, wh w h nd nhnd

h h q 2010. in kn yy nd,

h vd w y-v-y v nnn

d n hn 400%, wh uknn

vd ua-1 481% n h . inny,

h h d vd w n hn h

d y.

in vwn h v k nnn d d

h q 2011, w nd h vd n

h und Knd (uK-3) n n hd h hh v-

k nnn d, 22.7 m (n, xn

vd be-3 ndn). o h d vd-

, 26 hd v k nnn d n x 10

m, wh n ddn 44 hd v k nnn

d v 5 m; dvd v k nnn

d 1 m . th q, vd n

sh a (Za-1) hd h w v k nnn

d, vd j v 1 m. in vwn q-

y hn, ny n vd (cl-3) w v

k nnn d d q-v-q. Hwv,

vd pt-1 n p, dd , hh, wn95%. th qy v k nnn d

dn w n n vd Nc-1 n Nw cdn, whh

j v 52%. Yy hn w ny n,

wh v k nnn d hn dn

ny 50 vd. th y-v-y dn

w n n vd uK-3 n h und Knd nd

cN-1 n chn, whh 34% nd ny 40% vy.

h q 2011, w nd h, n n,

vn vd nd, n v,

hn n y (1 gb) nn ak nh.

(exn vd ca-1, whh h n nd

n xy h.) u n n ddn 77 vd-

nd h wd dwndd hn 100 mb n-

n ak nh dn h q, wh

n 20 h vd dwndd w hn 100 mb.

(i nn n h vd be-3 n h

20 wh nnn d wd nd h

n xy, dwnd v d n

n d xy, hh y hn nn, whh

d h xn h dny.) cnn w

hn 100% q-v-q n ny n vd (pt-

1), wh h qy dn w n n svnn

vd si-1, whh ny 65%. Hn Kn HK-1 w

h y-v-y n n nn nn,

nn v 840%, wh vd pt-1 h ny h n

nn dwnd v hn 500% n h

q 2010.


29/40


Austria AT-2 2649 15464 756

Belgium BE-1 2623 10229 482

Belgium BE-3 15366 43141 19

Belgium BE-2 1744 4358 20

Czech Republic CZ-1 1639 7925 80



Estonia EE-1 1058 5279 311

France FR-2 1988 7084 1420

Germany DE-1 843 3516 78

Germany DE-2 3988 11735 1970

Germany DE-3 1520 6468 141

Greece GR-1 4560 17794 390Greece GR-2 798 4823 155

Hungary HU-2 2307 11935 126

Hungary HU-1 1651 11835 193

Ireland IE-1 2685 12531 489

Ireland IE-2 1732 12925 632

Ireland IE-3 1734 12816 788

Italy IT-3 2913 12304 568

Italy IT-2 3565 17303 437

Italy IT-4 1030 6720 215

Lithuania LT-2 1543 9684 378

Lithuania LT-1 2248 12395 525

Moldova MD-1 1484 6437 129

Netherlands NL-2 2212 5749 30Netherlands NL-1 1529 4016 31

Norway NO-2 1717 5988 61

Q1 11Avg.kbps

IDQ1 11Peakkbps

Q1 11Avg. MB/mnt

Cuntry/Regin

AFRICA

Egypt EG-1 482 3001 245

Morocco MA-1 1118 9815 414

Nigeria NG-1 267 4174 391

South Arica ZA-1 364 1024 176

ASIA

China CN-1 1135 2870 162

Hong Kong HK-2 1325 7251 492

Hong Kong HK-1 2618 16358 3744

Indonesia ID-1 459 8070 2966

Israel IL-1 1873 7945 79

Japan JP-1 1613 8240 168

Kuwait KW-1 1857 8428 276Malaysia MY-1 590 3861 152

Malaysia MY-3 879 6387 366

Pakistan PK-1 876 5644 572

Qatar QA-1 2061 8697 209

Saudi Arabia SA-1 2021 8768 310

Singapore SG-3 1382 7341 672

Singapore SG-4 1858 8804 309

Singapore SG-5 650 5772 467

South Korea KR-1 1176 4134 101

Sri Lanka LK-1 701 5311 307

Taiwan TW-1 1280 6187 136

Taiwan TW-2 742 3308 154

Thailand TH-1 453 4154 90EUROPE

Austria AT-1 3392 14619 195

Q1 11Avg.kbps

IDQ1 11Peakkbps

Q1 11Avg. MB/mnt

Cuntry/Regin

ASIA

EURoPE

AFRICA

Figure 23: Average and Average Peak Connection Speed, Average Megabytes Downloaded per Month by Mobile Provider

During the frst quarter o 2011:

In the United States, or the frst time, 51% o the devices

sold were smartphones. Globally, the average is 26%.

One-third o all smartphones sold were sold in the United States.

Smartphones now account or 80% o the revenue o all

phones sold in the United States.

[Source: http://www.chetansharma.com/blog/2011/05/09/us-mobile-data-market-update-q1-2011/]

DID YOU

KNOW?


30/40


sectioN 5:m cnnvy(nnd)

Figure 23 (Cntinued)

Norway NO-1 1127 4900 65

Poland PL-1 3742 11952 141

Poland PL-2 1456 7323 77

Poland PL-4 6151 14893 141

Portugal PT-1 711 4311 217

Romania RO-1 674 3947 85

Russia RU-3 1452 5235 125

Russia RU-4 2571 10058 333

Russia RU-2 857 3777 92

Slovakia SK-1 163 1301 36

Slovakia SK-2 2133 9340 1825

Slovenia SI-1 1825 6474 35Spain ES-1 3385 19654 417

Spain ES-3 950 5327 134

Spain ES-2 958 3235 804

Turkey TR-1 1934 9098 217

Ukraine UA-1 1045 3101 69

Ukraine UA-2 1619 6709 128

United Kingdom UK-3 4206 22703 105



NORTH AMERICA

Canada CA-2 1051 2738 614

Canada CA-1 3174 20058 23404

Curacao CW-1 564 3551 295

El Salvador SV-2 1601 8870 655

El Salvador SV-1 1044 5627 300

Q1 11Avg.

kbps

IDQ1 11Peak

kbps

Q1 11Avg. MB/

mnt

Cuntry/Regin

NoRTh AMERICA

EURoPE (CoNTINUED El Salvador SV-3 622 3237 348

Guatemala GT-2 1059 6791 686

Guatemala GT-1 893 5434 188

Nicaragua NI-1 1278 7426 608

Puerto Rico PR-1 2230 9478 2249

United States US-2 1092 3930 39



OCEANIA

Australia AU-3 1601 8109 243

Australia AU-1 1201 10149 1640

Guam GU-1 538 2595 80

New Caledonia NC-1 674 2074 515New Zealand NZ-2 1445 8131 544

SOUTH AMERICA

Argentina AR-1 638 4066 94

Argentina AR-2 752 4629 152

Bolivia BO-1 214 3004 191

Brazil BR-1 741 4163 156

Brazil BR-2 792 4678 174

Chile CL-4 960 6766 467

Chile CL-3 1502 14242 203

Colombia CO-1 1000 6893 283

Paraguay PY-2 307 3312 314

Paraguay PY-1 564 5441 172

Uruguay UY-1 1842 15788 279

Uruguay UY-2 456 3879 67

Venezuela VE-1 752 5094 171

Q1 11Avg.

kbps

IDQ1 11Peak

kbps

Q1 11Avg. MB/

mnt

Cuntry/Regin

SoUTh AMERICA

oCEANIA


31/40


5.4 Mobile Trafc Growth As Observed

by Ericsson

in nwk, h d () n hd y dn n h . i

n ndnd v nd

n n d n d xn.

en n n hn 180 n, nd

nn hn 1,000 nwk

n en v nd d v-

. th nv n

wd n 2g, 3g, nd 4g nwk

(n ndn DVb-H, W, nd m Wmx).

th n hv n d v y,

nn nd wh. Hwv, h

n d nd v n h nwk

(2g, 3g, 4g/lte) nd h wd hw dn

n v wn k nd n, nd -

wn d h dn .

a d n 24, d d v

n n Q4 2009. th ndn d n

en n v nwk vn

n h wd. th wh n d -

Q1 2010 Q1 2011 w 130%.

5.5 3G Data Trafc Patterns o Multiple Connect-

ed Device Types As Observed by Ericsson

a nn inn nd

v 3g nwk. 25 hw h

v (v v nwk wh h nd

h hh ) nhy d

dvd v 3g nwk , nd -

hn dv (ndn andd-d hn nd a

phn). a h hw, h v nhy

v n v 3g nddy

h hh n (1 7 gb) wd y

(250 800 mb) nd hn (80 600 mb).

Figure 24: Total Monthly Mobile Voice and Data as Measured by Ericsson

V

D

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Q1

07

Q2

07

Q3

07

Q4

07

Q1

08

Q2

08

Q3

08

Q4

08

Q1

09

Q2

09

Q3

09

Q4

09

Q1

10

Q1

11

Q2

10

Q3

10

Q4

10

Total(UL+DL)monthlytra

ic(Exabyte/month)

Figure 25: Monthly Trafc Volumes in 3G Mobile Broadband Networks

per Subscriber

l t shn

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

GB/month/subscriber


32/40


sectioN 5:m cnnvy(nnd)

un 3g d n d y

en j n h wd, 26

hw hw h wdy d nn n n-

v inn v, nd hw

h nn vy y h y nnd dv,

d n d wdwd v v

d nwk. N h W fd

n ndd n ndyn d 25 26.

rd dv y, nn vd (30 40%) h

n v, wd y W

wn (20 30%). on -y dv, h n

hn n nn. on

nd hn dv, nn d, -, w

dwnd, nd nwkn n

n 3g d .

i nn xn h dn n

d n nd y , nd

hn. 27 hw nwk

24-h d (n dy), wh h hzn n

nd n , nd hdn n h

n n d v 3g h

n h n.

a d y h , hv w nn ny dn dy nd h vnn,

dwn, nd . an xnn h

ndyn d d v-n d hw

h v n -y dv h-

zd y n nnv nv

n (h nn vd nd W wn) nd

h w ndwdh d nn knd

n (h nn n). in n,

nd hn dv y hv qn nd h

n yy dn h wh dy, hwn d n. a hwn n 28, n xnn

h n hw h hy n w ndwdh

knd d nn (h n

d nd d hkn), nd wh

w nnv nv .

Figure 26: Average Application Volume Shares in Mobile

Broadband Networks or Dierent Device Types

l t shn

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

GB/month/subscriber

onn ad

onn Vd

W bwn

s Nwkn

e

shn

sw Dwnd

oh

Figure 27: Mobile Broadband Trafc Patterns Visualized

EachLine=TrafcoOne

RandomlySelectedSubscriber


33/40


i nn n h n v

3g nwk h hn

n hn n. x-

, n , n d x nn vd

hn hn . th -

n d ny d v

dn :

3g n d h n

vn inn (n wd nn-

n), wh nd hn n d

ndy dv.

s n nd hn

fdd 3g W.

mnhy d n n nd hn hn

th n n hn nd

( d ) y n

d vd nd W wn xn

Time (min.)

< 1 kbps > 1 Mbps100 kbps 1 Mbps10 100 kbps1 10 kbps

1 2 3 4 5

Eachline=trafficofone

randomlyselectedsubscriber

Laptop

T

ablet

Smartphone

Figure 28: Data transmission patterns rom laptops, tablets, and smartphones as examined over a fve-minute period


34/40


sectioN 6:Nwk o nd Dn

6.1 Egypt

adn hd , n Jny, h

eyn vnn k h ndnd

n ny h ny inn

n n wdd .29 th ny v-

nn dd h h j inn sv

pvd whn h ny h dwn nnn- nnn h inn n Jny 28. th h-

dwn w nn, n n d 20 n

eyn inn ; inn

nn rny nd, evy eyn vd,

vy n, nk, inn , w, h, -

y, nd vnn h d n h

eyn isp h inn nnvy nw

h h wd.30 th eyn vnn

ndd h hdwn v dy , n y 2.

a hwn n 29, h v n

dvd y ak n ey dd -

y nn wh h vd n h dwn,

nd nd n-z v h dn h

. inny, n n inn ,

kd v hy hh hn h n

dy h hdwn, ky d

n- dnd nw, nwkn, nd

h y nn eyn .

Figure 29: Multiday Internet Outage in Egypt lasted rom January 27 through February 2

1/27

/201

1

1/31

/201

1

1/29

/201

1

2/2/20

11

1/28

/201

1

2/1/20

11

1/30

/201

1

in h q 2011, inn dn n d n

v n nd h wd d vnn n n n ,

n d, ddy nh, y vnn . in h nw, w vw n n y nd n dvd y

ak n h n.


35/40


addny, n mh 3d, hwn n 31,

ak dvd n ly n-z v,

nd nd h wy v wk. a

inn nn rny nd h, dn h

d, ny vy h nd ly hd n-

nv. rny nd, Y d n h,

nd n h h h, y v

, y k dn n ... n ny vy

, h w n n. 32 s wh d

n ey, h lyn vnn ny dd ly

t & thny h h fw h

n n, h hn nn ny33

h wd ky xn why ak n h n-

y dd n d y z dn h d.

6.2 Libya

wn h inn n ey h d

n n wdd , n n

ly dv w dn n inn nnvy

n ly n h hd wk y, wd y

n dn h d n y mh. ad-

n hd , w d

dn h y 18-20 d, whh inn

nd v 60-80% h n

h dn.31 th h ak dvd

n ly dn h w wk y 14-28 d,

hwn n 30, h w y dn

d dn h 18h-20h, nd h k v

h w n h n n h

dy .

2/14

/201

1

2/15

/201

1

2/16

/201

1

2/17

/201

1

2/18

/201

1

2/19

/201

1

2/20

/201

1

2/21

/201

1

2/22

/201

1

2/23

/201

1

2/24

/201

1

2/25

/201

1

2/26

/201

1

2/27

/201

1

2/28

/201

1

3/1/20

11

Figure 30: Two brie disruptions in Internet connectivity in Libya occurred during the third week o February

Figure 31: A longer disruption in Libyas Internet connectivity occurred in early March

3/1/20

11

3/2/20

11

3/3/20

11

3/4/20

11

3/5/20

11

3/6/20

11

3/7/20

11

3/8/20

11

3/9/20

11


36/40


sectioN 5:Nwk o nd Dn(nnd)

6.3 Japan

on mh 11, nd 8.9 hqk k

nh Jn nd wnd n wh wv h

hd x nnd.34 D dn nd-

nn nn vd KDDi,

h n d dd n hw wdd

n- inn whn Jn. a hwn n

32, ak dvd Jn dd -

xy 27% dy h hqk

d n v hy h. Wh

n hwn n h , ak nn ndd

h n h dy h hqk, h k v

dvd Jn w hh hn h n

h hqk, ky d Jn zn

nn h inn dd nw nd nn

n h d, w n nd nd n-

wh nd nd y.

Figure 32: The earthquake occurred at 05:46 UTC, and resulted in a 27% drop in trafc

3/

10/201

115

:50

3/10

/201

118

:14

3/10

/201

120

:38

3/10

/201

123

:02

3/10

/201

11:26

3/10

/201

13:50

3/10

/201

16:14

3/10

/201

18:38

3/10

/201

111

:02

In January 2008, a pair o cut submarine telecom cables in

the Mediterranean just north o Egypt caused severe Internetoutages and disruptions in the Middle East, Pakistan and India.

In September 2008, Hurricane Ike caused extensive Internet

outages across the United States.

In December 2008, three key submarine cables in the

Mediterranean were severed, which impacted Internet

trafc in the Middle East and Indian subcontinent.

DID YOU

KNOW?


37/40


6.4 Georgia/Armenia

Wh h n inn nd dn

n h q w d n d

vnn n, hd nd h

dn n n mh n h n en

n g nd an hd

n . th 35 h 75-y

d gn wn hn

- nn gn rwy t,

whh d 90 n v nd

nn n nhn an

ny 12 h wh hn gn nn

v vd. 33 n n

h ak dvd g nd an wn

mh 26h nd 31. a n n n h hhhd

, hw y n h n w

nhy dn n mh 28, ky

d h dn n inn d y

h vd , W w wddn

h h v h h ny n

nn vd w vnd yn

h n v.36

Figure 33: Note the uncharacteristically large dips in Akamai trafc delivered to Georgia (L) and Armenia (R) on March 28

28. m26. m 30. m28. m26. m 30. m

Georgia Armenia

In June 2009, Internet connectivity in Iran experienced

disruptions related to unrest around controversial electionswithin the country.

In July 2009, damage to the undersea SAT-3 cable caused

Internet connectivity problems in West Arica.

In 2010, damage to submarine cables caused Internet

outages in Haiti (January), Taiwan (March), the Middle

East (April), and Malaysia (April).

DID YOU

KNOW?


38/40


sectioN 6:andx

*Countrieslistedwithhadewerthan25,0

00uniqueIPaddressesconnectingtoAkamaidurin

gthefrstquarteratthisspeed.

Basedontherevised

thresholdorinclusion,

theywerenotincludedintheglobalranking.

Unique IPAddresses

Avg. CnnectinSpeed (Mbps)

Peak CnnectinSpeed (Mbps)

% AttackTrafc

% Abve5 Mbps*

% Abve2 Mbps*

% Bew256 kbps*

Cuntry/Regin

EURoPE

Austria 0.1% 2,861,052 4.4 15.7 24% 71%

Belgium 0.1% 3,920,493 6.1 24.7 52% 90%

Czech Republic 0.2% 2,054,599 6.5 20.7 48% 94% Denmark 0.1% 2,463,216 5.6 17.4 43% 87%

Finland 0.1% 2,660,860 4.9 16.5 31% 68%

France 1.2% 24,010,722 3.6 14.2 13% 79% 0.3%

Germany 2.1% 34,785,032 4.7 18.3 27% 91% 0.6%

Greece 0.2% 2,459,685 3.5 17.0 9.1% 80%

Hungary 1.8% 2,111,588 5.1 21.4 35% 91%

Iceland


39/40


1 h://.y/jJe5v

2 h://www.nkwkn./wk/d/

cnk_Wkn_g_ln_lnd_17_Jn_

2010_n.d

3 h://www../_21.h, h://.n./

.h?=21, h://www../ip_p21.h

4 h://www.n./nn/-n

5 h://www.j./d/-d-wndw.h.n

6 h://nw.n./8301-30685_3-20030105-264.h

7 h://www.nwkwd./ny//

-y-n-75-n-v4-dd

8 h://n./a/2011/03/04/ipv4-k-

-d-dd-.x?=1

9 h://www.n.n/n/nw/2011/n-8

10 h://www.n.n/y/dd-n-y#9.10

11 h://www..n//2011-02/n-1.h

12 h://n.nn.//nn/2011--

y/031788.h

13 h://3.znw./x-/-1.v.z

14 h://n-v6..nn.d/n/ndx.h

15

h://www../n/n/v6/

16 h://.nwk./y/v6/

17 h://www../n/n/v6// [gh

nwd Jny 1, 2011 mh 31, 2011]

18 h://www.k./d/wh/Hw_w_h_

nn_.d

19 h://www.../n/100/2011/110503.h

20 h://../nn_y/nw//.

?_d=46

21 h://www.nn.v./qny-kd-qn/#558

sectioN 7:endn

22 h://www.-y./q/

23 th v k nnn d n

n v h x d nnn d

h nq ip dd n y ak

hy. th v d n d h nnv x d nn-

n d. in n h v d nnn

d, h v k nnn d

nv wh ny nd- inn nnn

. (th nd h n -d

d n hn h y nd whn

h nwk y vd, n d dv dwnd

d .)

24 h://www.ddvd./w-nn/d/2011/04/

bdnd_dn_n_vn__nh_nd1.d

25 h://www.hy./d/d/

/2010/12/09/--nn-dnd-n/

26 id.

27 h://www.k./h/hny/d/

d.h

28 h://www.k./n/ndx1.h

29 h://www.yzn./a/2781237/

ey--nn-n---n-.h

30 h://www.ny.//2011/01/y-v-h-

nn.h

31 h://nw.n./8301-31921_3-20035079-281.h

32 h://www.ny.//2011/03/wh-y-nd-

-y.h

33 id.

34 h://.nn./2011-03-11/wd/jn.qk_1_

hkkd-n--jn-wy?_=pm:WorlD

35 h://www.h..k/nw/wdnw//-

/8442056/Wn-wh--nn--g-nd-

an-hd-nv-hd--w.h

36 h://www.dn..k/wd/2011//06/n-

wn--w-


40/40

th ak Dnak k h inn wk h -knwn n n h wd wh n d n,

, w, HD vd nd w---v. Dvn nhd n, nd y, ak

n n h ak inn inn p, nq n h ndy d h nny nd nn

nd y dd 650 , n 72 n nd nd n 1,000 h inn

n nwk. t n v www.k. w n tw @k.

aknwdnEDITOR: Dvd bn

CONTRIBUTOR: Jn thn

CONTRIBUTOR: pk g

CONTRIBUTOR:ay gdn

EXECUTIVE EDITOR: bd rnkn

EXECUTIVE EDITOR:t lhn

Please send comments, questions, and corrections to [email protected]

Follow @akamai and @akamai_soti on

2011 ak thn, in. a rh rvd. rdn n

wh n n ny d wh x wn n

hd. ak nd h ak wv d dk

International Ofces

unhn,

gny

p, n

bn, ind

sydny, a

bjn, chn

Akamai Technologies, Inc.

U.S. Headquarters

8 cd cn

cd, ma 02142

t 617.444.3000

Date post:	07-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	retelur
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

"The State of the Internet". Primer trimestre de 2011 (Akamai) Ag11

Documents