+ All Categories
Home > Documents > THE THYROID AND LACTATION

THE THYROID AND LACTATION

Date post: 04-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: voquynh
View: 215 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
2
1121 are still some severe septicaemias that defy all attempts at exact diagnosis. And it might be profitable to find out whether V. fetus infection takes any part in the causation of that 25% of all abortions which are said to be unexplained. MEDICAL PATENTS AMONG doctors the habit is to share knowledge freely : what is learnt by one is made known to all. Desire to preserve this open communication and to avoid harmful monopolies underlies the precept that no medical man should take out a patent in respect of a medical invention. In abstract this isa sound, and even a noble, idea ; but in the context of a warmly competitive world market it has proved increasingly detrimental to those whom it is meant to protect-the public. Accordingly, in their annual report 1 the council of the British Medical Associa- tion recommend that, subject to certain conditions, a doctor should be allowed to patent an invention. Patentable discoveries derive from the work not of clinicians but of research-workers, who nowadays are associated with chemists, physicists, engineers, and others. A special committee which the council appointed, with Dr. Robert Forbes as chairman, notes that " there immediately arises the possibility of a moral obligation upon the non-medical specialist to avoid patenting where formerly he would have patented, and it may be incumbent upon the medical profession to make con- cessions in departing from the custom that formerly prevailed." There are further, and perhaps weightier, arguments for a change of attitude. Where an invention is not protected by a patent, a manufacturer would normally refuse to handle it, lest others took the oppor- tunity of profiting freely by his development of the discovery. More important still, observance of the no-patenting rule may tell hard on the whole country, particularly where a " central " patent is vacated : the British consumer now pays royalties to American firms for penicillin manufactured in this country. Some years ago the British Medical Association pro- posed that doctors should be enabled to dedicate patents to the public. There are precedents for such usage. The Dicks patented their scarlet-fever toxin and antitoxin, but delegated their rights to a special committee. The patent for Sir Frederick Banting’s process for preparing insulin was taken out in the name of the University of Toronto, but the British rights were vested in the Medical Research Council. The way to delegation in the public interest has now been opened by the Development of Inventions Act, 1948, under which the National Research Development Corporation was set up as an independent body to which medical patents might be assigned. As regards reward to the inventor, none would be paid by the Corporation to anyone who is another man’s servant -for instance, a Crown servant, who in any event would be precluded by his contract from deriving any benefit from his invention (though he might receive an award from the Departmental Awards Committee). The relationship between the corporation and a sole worker not employed by an organisation who wished to assign a patent and claim an award would be one of buyer and seller ; but, says the B.M.A. report, "in the case of a medical man the Corporation would not take any action that would conflict with a policy laid down by the profession as a whole." When the association’s Representative Body meets next month it will be asked to approve the conclusion that " in the opinion of the Association there is no longer any objection to the patenting of inventions for which members of the medical profession are responsible, provided such patents are assigned to the National Development Corporation with a view to their administration in the best interests of the Dublic as a whftjf " This Hfma a raH).:) enl"tinn. 1. Brit. med. J. suppl. June 10, p. 276. THE THYROID AND LACTATION THE lactation-stimulating (galactopoietic) effect of thyroid-active preparations seems to have been first suggested in 1896 by an experiment of Hertoghe,l who increased the milk yield of a cow by feeding it dried thyroid gland. This effect of dried thyroid was later independently rediscovered -and extended to thyroxine by Graham,2 and soon the results of Folley and White 3 in lactating cows clearly demon- strated the considerable galactopoiesis produced by injections of crystalline thyroxine. Interest in the possible applications of this discovery in dairy farming remained lukewarm for some years, mainly because of the belief that the effectiveness of thyroxine by mouth was so low that it would be uneconomic to give it to milking cows except by injection, which would obviously be impracticable. And dried thyroid gland, though fully active by mouth in cows, was not plentiful or cheap enough to be a practical alternative. At the beginning of the late war, however, Ludwig and von Mutzen- becher 4 discovered that a thyroid-active protein effective by mouth could be prepared by the iodination of casein. Improved methods of cheap large-scale production were soon devised, so that extensive researches could be begun on the various uses of this artificial thyroid-active protein in agriculture, mainly for increasing the milk yield of cattle, but to a less extent for stimulating egg- production in hens and accelerating growth in young pigs. 5 Lately the wheel has come full circle, bringing synthetic thyroxine back into the picture. A new synthesis of l-thyroxine has been worked out 6 which seems capable of large-scale development so as to supply the synthetic hormone in considerable amounts at relatively low cost. Following this, Bailey, Bartlett, and Folley have shown that l-thyroxine by mouth is a good deal more active in stimulating lactation in milking cows than has hitherto been believed. The optimum oral dose of the synthetic hormone for this purpose (about ten times that by the subcutaneous route) is such that, in view of its relatively low cost of production by the new method, it is likely to be at least as cheap to use as iodocasein, and in practice it has some important advantages. Thus, the crystalline l-thyroxine is virtually tasteless, whereas iodocasein preparations are often so unpalatable that a significant proportion of cows will refuse to eat rations containing them. Perhaps its most valuable feature is that, being a pure crystalline substance, it does not need to be standardised by bio-assay, a trouble- some and unsatisfactory procedure which has proved difficult from the very outset of the experiments with iodocasein in this country. Provided the long-term experiments now in progress under the auspices of the Agricultural Research Council show that the repeated administration of thyroid preparations in successive lactations does no harm to the health or reproductive abilities of the cattle, synthetic thyroxine is likely to be chosen for general use. The thyroid treatment of hypogalactia in women also dates back to Hertoghe, but the modern clinical investi- gations can be said to have started with the work of Robinsoii,8 who reported successful though variable results in hypogalactia by feeding either dried thyroid 1. Hertoghe, E. Bull. Acad. Méd. Belg. 1896, ser. 4, 10, 381. See Robertson, J. D. Lancet, 1946, i, 978. 2. Graham, W. R. jun. J. Nutrit. 1934, 7, 407 ; Biochem. J. 1934, 28, 1368. 3. Folley, S. J., White, P. Proc. roy. Soc. B. 1936, 120, 346. 4. Ludwig, V., von Mutzenbecher, P. Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 1939, 258, 195. 5. See Reineke, E. P. Vit. & Horm. 1946, 4, 207. Young, F. G. Brit. med. Bull. 1947, 5, 155. 6. Chalmers, J. R., Dickson, G. T., Elks, J., Hems, B. A. J. chem. Soc. 1949, p. 3424. 7. Bailey, G. L., Bartlett, S., Folley, S. J. Nature, Lond. 1949, 163, 800. 8. Robinson, M. Lancet, 1947, ii, 385.
Transcript
Page 1: THE THYROID AND LACTATION

1121

are still some severe septicaemias that defy all attemptsat exact diagnosis. And it might be profitable to findout whether V. fetus infection takes any part in thecausation of that 25% of all abortions which are said tobe unexplained.

MEDICAL PATENTS

AMONG doctors the habit is to share knowledge freely :what is learnt by one is made known to all. Desire to

preserve this open communication and to avoid harmfulmonopolies underlies the precept that no medical manshould take out a patent in respect of a medical invention.In abstract this isa sound, and even a noble, idea ; butin the context of a warmly competitive world marketit has proved increasingly detrimental to those whom itis meant to protect-the public. Accordingly, in theirannual report 1 the council of the British Medical Associa-tion recommend that, subject to certain conditions, adoctor should be allowed to patent an invention.Patentable discoveries derive from the work not of

clinicians but of research-workers, who nowadays areassociated with chemists, physicists, engineers, andothers. A special committee which the council appointed,with Dr. Robert Forbes as chairman, notes that " thereimmediately arises the possibility of a moral obligationupon the non-medical specialist to avoid patentingwhere formerly he would have patented, and it may beincumbent upon the medical profession to make con-cessions in departing from the custom that formerlyprevailed." There are further, and perhaps weightier,arguments for a change of attitude. Where an inventionis not protected by a patent, a manufacturer wouldnormally refuse to handle it, lest others took the oppor-tunity of profiting freely by his development of the

discovery. More important still, observance of the

no-patenting rule may tell hard on the whole country,particularly where a " central " patent is vacated : theBritish consumer now pays royalties to American firmsfor penicillin manufactured in this country.Some years ago the British Medical Association pro-

posed that doctors should be enabled to dedicate patentsto the public. There are precedents for such usage. TheDicks patented their scarlet-fever toxin and antitoxin,but delegated their rights to a special committee. The

patent for Sir Frederick Banting’s process for preparinginsulin was taken out in the name of the University ofToronto, but the British rights were vested in the MedicalResearch Council. The way to delegation in the publicinterest has now been opened by the Development ofInventions Act, 1948, under which the National ResearchDevelopment Corporation was set up as an independentbody to which medical patents might be assigned. As

regards reward to the inventor, none would be paid bythe Corporation to anyone who is another man’s servant-for instance, a Crown servant, who in any eventwould be precluded by his contract from deriving anybenefit from his invention (though he might receive anaward from the Departmental Awards Committee). Therelationship between the corporation and a sole workernot employed by an organisation who wished to assigna patent and claim an award would be one of buyerand seller ; but, says the B.M.A. report, "in the caseof a medical man the Corporation would not take anyaction that would conflict with a policy laid down bythe profession as a whole." When the association’sRepresentative Body meets next month it will be askedto approve the conclusion that " in the opinion of theAssociation there is no longer any objection to the

patenting of inventions for which members of the medicalprofession are responsible, provided such patents are

assigned to the National Development Corporation with aview to their administration in the best interests of theDublic as a whftjf " This Hfma a raH).:) enl"tinn.

1. Brit. med. J. suppl. June 10, p. 276.

THE THYROID AND LACTATION

THE lactation-stimulating (galactopoietic) effect of

thyroid-active preparations seems to have been first

suggested in 1896 by an experiment of Hertoghe,lwho increased the milk yield of a cow by feedingit dried thyroid gland. This effect of dried thyroidwas later independently rediscovered -and extendedto thyroxine by Graham,2 and soon the results of

Folley and White 3 in lactating cows clearly demon-strated the considerable galactopoiesis produced byinjections of crystalline thyroxine. Interest in the

possible applications of this discovery in dairy farmingremained lukewarm for some years, mainly because ofthe belief that the effectiveness of thyroxine by mouthwas so low that it would be uneconomic to give it to

milking cows except by injection, which would obviouslybe impracticable. And dried thyroid gland, though fullyactive by mouth in cows, was not plentiful or cheapenough to be a practical alternative. At the beginningof the late war, however, Ludwig and von Mutzen-becher 4 discovered that a thyroid-active protein effectiveby mouth could be prepared by the iodination of casein.Improved methods of cheap large-scale production weresoon devised, so that extensive researches could bebegun on the various uses of this artificial thyroid-activeprotein in agriculture, mainly for increasing the milkyield of cattle, but to a less extent for stimulating egg-production in hens and accelerating growth in youngpigs. 5

Lately the wheel has come full circle, bringing syntheticthyroxine back into the picture. A new synthesis ofl-thyroxine has been worked out 6 which seems capableof large-scale development so as to supply the synthetichormone in considerable amounts at relatively low cost.Following this, Bailey, Bartlett, and Folley have shownthat l-thyroxine by mouth is a good deal more activein stimulating lactation in milking cows than hashitherto been believed. The optimum oral dose of thesynthetic hormone for this purpose (about ten times thatby the subcutaneous route) is such that, in view of itsrelatively low cost of production by the new method, itis likely to be at least as cheap to use as iodocasein, andin practice it has some important advantages. Thus,the crystalline l-thyroxine is virtually tasteless, whereasiodocasein preparations are often so unpalatable thata significant proportion of cows will refuse to eatrations containing them. Perhaps its most valuablefeature is that, being a pure crystalline substance, itdoes not need to be standardised by bio-assay, a trouble-some and unsatisfactory procedure which has proveddifficult from the very outset of the experiments withiodocasein in this country. Provided the long-termexperiments now in progress under the auspices of theAgricultural Research Council show that the repeatedadministration of thyroid preparations in successivelactations does no harm to the health or reproductiveabilities of the cattle, synthetic thyroxine is likely to bechosen for general use.The thyroid treatment of hypogalactia in women also

dates back to Hertoghe, but the modern clinical investi-gations can be said to have started with the work ofRobinsoii,8 who reported successful though variableresults in hypogalactia by feeding either dried thyroid1. Hertoghe, E. Bull. Acad. Méd. Belg. 1896, ser. 4, 10, 381.

See Robertson, J. D. Lancet, 1946, i, 978.2. Graham, W. R. jun. J. Nutrit. 1934, 7, 407 ; Biochem. J. 1934,

28, 1368.3. Folley, S. J., White, P. Proc. roy. Soc. B. 1936, 120, 346.4. Ludwig, V., von Mutzenbecher, P. Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 1939, 258,

195.5. See Reineke, E. P. Vit. & Horm. 1946, 4, 207. Young, F. G.

Brit. med. Bull. 1947, 5, 155.6. Chalmers, J. R., Dickson, G. T., Elks, J., Hems, B. A. J.

chem. Soc. 1949, p. 3424.7. Bailey, G. L., Bartlett, S., Folley, S. J. Nature, Lond. 1949,

163, 800.8. Robinson, M. Lancet, 1947, ii, 385.

Page 2: THE THYROID AND LACTATION

1122

gland or thyroxine. The value of thyroid treatment hasrecently been demonstrated in France by Romani et a1.9,who confirmed the effectiveness of crystalline thyroxineby mouth in women, and by Roche et al.1o with iodo-casein. These successful results will no doubt be followedup, but in view of the advantages of synthetic thyroxineenumerated by Bailey et al. there does not seem to bemuch point in further studies with iodinated casein oreven dried thyroid gland. Robinson 11 implied that inthe cases she investigated the hypogalactia was due tounder-production of thyroxine stemming from a latentiodine deficiency becoming manifest under the stress oflactation. On this basis she treated hypogalactia withLugol’s iodine solution, but her favourable results havenot been confirmed 12 ; in any case, what is known aboutthe relation of the thyroid gland to lactation 13 lends littlesupport to the iodine-deficiency view.

THE BIRTHDAY HONOURS

WITH eight new knighthoods the list of doctors in theBirthday Honours is longer than it seemed at first sight,and it contains many notable names. Mr. Arthur Porritt,who as chairman of the Empire Games Federation is

appointed K.c.M.G., is well known as an athlete, a surgeon,and a soldier, and very well liked in all capacities. AsE.B.B. the heads of the medical departments of the

Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force, Vice-AdmiralGreeson and Air Marshal Livingston, are joined withProf. Hamilton Fairley, F.R.s., one of the most respectedfigures in tropical medicine, who served the Services sofaithfully during the war. Of the four knights bachelor,one, Dr. W. S. Newton, belongs, like Professor Fairley,to Australia, where he is physician to the Alfred Hospital,Melbourne. Dr. A. N. Drury, F.R.s., whose administrativetalents were discovered only by the war, has provedhimself a most happy choice for the directorship of theLister Institute in its time of growing activity. Prof.Geoffrey Jefferson F.R.S., besides the specialised know-ledge that has earned him his new facilities forneurological surgery at Manchester, has a strength andwisdom that give him wide influence. And finallyProfessor Spence, of Newcastle and the UniversityGrants Committee, has a flow of ideas-always arrestingand often strangely right-which makes him one of themost valuable members of our profession. The other

appointments to orders are for equally various services-important and often unobtrusive-which it is goodto see occasionally recognised in a formal way.

SERVICE DOCTORS’ PAY

To explain the Army’s difficulties in finding enoughdoctors one need go no further than the Government’sstatement on defence,u which says : " a high level ofrecruitment cannot be expected unless Service conditions.compete in attractiveness with those of civilian life."

Professionally the conditions are far more attractivethan is often supposed. As General Cantlie told theWest London Medico-Chirurgical Society the other day,the Army in peace-time is responsible for the medicalcare of 400,000 men, women, and children. Its hospitalsnow admit civilians when they have room, and last year7000 operations were performed in them, not to mention5000 deliveries of soldiers’ wives in Army family hospitals.The service offers opportunities not only of working, butalso of training, in a specialty, and of 90 officers studying9. Romani, J. D., Plocq, G., Recht, P. Rev. Sci. méd., Paris,

1949, 2, 16.10. Roche, J., Giraud, P., Lelong, M., Liardet, J., Coignet, J.

Bull. Acad. Méd., Paris, 1950, 134, 190.11. Robinson, M. Brit. med. J. 1947, ii, 126.12. Nicholson, D. P. Ibid, 1948, i, 1029. Dean, R. F. A. Lancet,

1950, i, 762.13. Folley, S. J., Malpress, F. The Hormones, edited by G. Pincus

and K. V. Thimann. New York, 1948; chap. xvi.14. Statement on Defence. Cmd. 7895. 1950. H.M. Stationery Office.

at Millbank since the war no fewer than 74 have obtained

higher diplomas. Professionally, indeed, the prospectsin a Service career are probably better than ever before;and, now that the post-war revulsion of feeling againstmilitary life is diminishing, the Army would no doubtenlist many young doctors, provided it could also offerthem adequate pay. But that is just what it cannotdo.

So long as the Treasury refuses to let Service remunera-tion " compete in attractiveness

" with that of civiliandoctors, the Army is forced to rely more on compulsionthan attraction. As the establishment of regular andshort-service R.A.M.C. officers is 37% below strength,15it depends for general-duty officers on conscription, whichapplies to doctors up to the age of thirty. This, however,is only a partial and temporary solution of the problem,for an increasing proportion of newly qualified doctorshave already performed their National Service, and in1952, Lord Webb-Johnson says, there will be a shortageof about 500 medical officers in the Army alone." Ifthat seems a distant difficulty, the lack of specialists,on the other hand, is very present and pressing. TheArmy has only about two-thirds of the number itrequires, and, since conscription of doctors up to thirtyyears of age does little to bring in experienced specialists,it has been obliged to advertise for civilians to fill themore serious gaps. Meanwhile it has continued-fordoctors and dentists only-the war-time ban on theretirement of officers.

This situation is thoroughly unsatisfactory. For wellover a year the British Medical Association has beenmaking representations,17 and at one time it seemedalmost certain that action would be taken ; but thediscussions held with the Defence departments in

January and April proved fruitless because the Chancellorof the Exchequer is frankly less concerned with theefficiency of the Government services than with main-taining the wage-freeze. As in the case of Civil Servicedoctors, what is really needed is not a concession here orthere by the Treasury, but an unprejudiced examinationof the facts, in the light of which the Government candecide its policy. When a similar situation arose in theR.A.M.C. after the war of 1914-18, a Cabinet committeewas eventually set up, in 1925, to inquire into medicalremuneration in the Services; and ’such an investigationshould be made again now. Unfortunately in 1925 thisprocedure was not adopted until the B.M.A., allegingbreach of faith by the Government, announced that itwould no longer publish in its journal any reference tothe terms and conditions of service in the R.A.M.C.Doubtless having this precedent in mind, the B.M.A. hasformally stated that it will accept no more advertisementsfor civilian specialists for the Army at higher ratesof pay than those of the corresponding regularofficers.15

.

Though the practice of reinforcing the Army medicalservices by employing civilian specialists is not in itselfunreasonable, and though the payment of rather higherrates for such temporary appointments can also bedefended, the combination of underpayment in the

service, a ban on retirement, and the importation ofcivilians at- considerably higher remuneration seems tous intolerable. The ban on retirement puts this affairin a different category from that of the Civil Servicedoctors ; and though, as an independent journal, weare, for reasons stated,18 averse from refusing advertise-ments for Government appointments, we shall feelobliged to refuse those of the Army unless the banis lifted in the near future or a proper inquiry isinstituted.

15. Brit. med. J. May 20, p. 1184.16. See Lancet, April 22, p. 777.17. Brit. med. J. May 20, suppl. p. 223.18. Lancet, May 20, p. 959.


Recommended