Date post: | 08-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Government & Nonprofit |
Upload: | wri-ross-center-for-sustainable-cities |
View: | 432 times |
Download: | 2 times |
www.TransformingTransportation.org
The Transport Tax - Strasbourg
Roland Ries, Mayor, City of StrasbourgPresented at Transforming Transportation 2016
TRANSFORMING TRANSPORTATION
15th of January 2016
ROLAND RIES Mayor of Strasbourg
The Transport Tax« Versement Transport »
(VT)
=> A tax dedicated to Urban mobility
created :
- in 1971 in the Paris Region
- extended to the whole country in 1973
=> levied on: enterprises and administrations of more than 9
employees (11 employees since January 1st 2016) located in
the urban transport perimeter (PTU)
4
=> Based on the wage bill
=> Created locally by Urban Mobility Authorities
(AOMD) if they wish to do so
=> Rates: urban authorities decide on the rates within
the legal ceiling set by the central Government
=> The VT is the main resource to finance urban
transport in France (investments and operations)
5
The logic beyond the VT:
- Transport networks must be financed by all those who
benefit from them and not only by users
- The VT is a counterpart enterprises pay for their workers to
benefit from good transport network
6
VT proceeds evolution (in M€)
7
The Versement Transport is the main source of
funding for Urban mobility
More 7,1 billion € collected in 2013 :
=> 3,745 billion € in the country outside the Paris region
=> 3,424 billion € in the Paris region
Contributes up to 40% to the financing of Urban Transport outside
Paris and 31% in the Paris region
8
Transport Tax Rates
* Rates applicable on 1st July 2015 in the 4 largest
employment areas in France
Other cities, except Paris (Article L.2333-67 du Code
Général des Collectivités Territoriales)
Régime général + bonus intercommunalité*+ bonus commune
touristique**
Agglomération de plus de 100 000 habitantsTCSP 1,75% 1,80% 2,00%
sans TCSP 1,00% 1,05% 1,25%
Agglomération de 50 à 100 000 habitants
TCSP 0,85% 0,90% 1,10%
Sans TCSP 0,55% 0,60% 0,80%
Agglomération de 10 à 50 000 habitants - 0,55% 0,60% 0,80%
Agglomération de moins de 10 000 habitants
avec au moins une commune touristique- 0,55% - -
Régime général + bonus intercommunalité*+ bonus commune
touristique**
Agglomération de plus de 100 000 habitantsTCSP 1,75% 1,80% 2,00%
sans TCSP 1,00% 1,05% 1,25%
Agglomération de 50 à 100 000 habitants
TCSP 0,85% 0,90% 1,10%
Sans TCSP 0,55% 0,60% 0,80%
Agglomération de 10 à 50 000 habitants - 0,55% 0,60% 0,80%
Agglomération de moins de 10 000 habitants
avec au moins une commune touristique- 0,55% - -
Geografic Area Transport Taxe Rate
Ile de France Transport Union
(Paris & Hauts de Seine)2,85%
Seine Saint Denis, Val de Marne, Seine et
Marne, Yvelines, Essonne, Val d'Oise1,91%
Strasbourg Eurometropole 2,00%
Aix en Provence Metropole 1,70%
Rhône and the Lyon Metropole SMTC
(SYRTAL )1,00%
9
Pros and cons of the VT
1) Pros:
- Enabled the renewal of urban Transport in France
- A tax decided, recovered and used locally
- Gives urban transport authorities some visibility on their
resources
10
Pros and cons of the VT
1) Pros:
- A major resource for urban transport
- Allows to offer lower fares on transport networks
11
Pros and cons of the VT
- 2) Cons:
- An additional burden on companies
- Companies of less than 9 employees do not pay it ( shops in
town center,..)
- Companies just outside the urban transport perimeter do not
pay but benefit from the transport network
12
Pros and cons of the VT
- 2) Cons:
- VT proceeds follow economic activity fluctuations
- Most urban transport authorities have reached the legal
ceiling allowed and are looking for new resources
- The amount of VT collected by cities is very different
between cities according to the number of private companies
and administrations located in the urban transport perimeter
13
The VT: an innovative tax ?
- Counterpart of transport services of high quality
- In line with climate and COP21 objectives
15
Can the VT be implemented in other countries?
- Conditions of success:
- - The tax must be accepted socially
- - The society as a whole must be law abiding
- - The tax does not go well with informal economy
- The tax is local and developing countries tend to be fiscally
centralized
- 16