Date post: | 17-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | edgar-robinson |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 2 times |
The View from NSF
Very Wide Field Surveysin the Light of Astro2010
Space Telescope Science InstituteJune 13 2011Nigel Sharp
1
MPS FY 2012 Budget Request Highlights
MPS Budget Request Reflects NSF Priorities
Support innovation in healthy core programs Invest in research addressing national priorities
– OneNSF Activities: SEES, CIF21 Advance a strong scientific and technical workforce
– CAREER, postdocs, GRF, REU Support multidisciplinary research
– Centers, institutes, and networks
Invest in facilities critical for fundamental research– New Era of Observation; ties into CIF21
MPS Request: $1.43B +$80.89M (+ 6.0% )
2
Realitiesof FY 2011 and 2012 Budgets
3
NSF R&RA %/FY10 AST %/FY10
FY10 Omnibus $5.62B 0.0% $245.7M 0.0%
FY11 Request $6.02B (+8.0%) $251.8M (+2.5%)
FY11 Approp. $5.56B -0.9% ??? -xx%
FY12 Request $6.25B (+12.4%) $249.1M (+1.4%)
FY12 Approp. ??? ??? ??? ???
Percentages for the FY11 Request are quoted relative to initial FY10 estimates, while percentages for the FY12 Request are quoted relative to FY10 enacted/FY11 CR estimates. FY11 appropriation number includes a 0.2% rescission.
3
Sample BudgetSuggestions for Astro2010
1: FY11=0.95*FY10, then 2.5%/yr
2: FY11&12=request, then flat
3: FY11&12=request, then 2.5%/yr
4: FY11&12=request, then 4.5%/yr
5: FY11&12=request, then 6.5%/yr
4
Astro2010 Ramp + Budget Scenarios
5
4
3
5
Current Astro2010 Plans
Continuing LSST D&D funding, with efforts to move toward PDR and MREFC start (FY14?)
No funding wedge available for mid-scale Seeking ways to create budget space
No GSMT commitment in FY12 request No current budget envelope for initiating the
recommended “small” increases, but protecting AAG & ATI near current levels
Pursuing Gemini governance & OIR issues Planning overall strategic review soon
6
7
Strategic Review Plan
Assess the proper strategic balance within the division in 2015, 2020, and 2025, including all of the program Based on science program recommended by Astro2010 Specific realizable budget scenarios to be addressed Evolution of program also must be realizable Any facility decommissioning may require application of
significant funding before savings can be achieved AST working group settling the exact charge and
management plan for this strategic review Goal of receiving report by mid-2012
ALMA Status
8
9
Improvements over current state of the art:
• Resolution – ~3X improvement• Light grasp – ~8X improvement (solar physics is
actually photon starved in some experiments)
Technical Specifications:• 4-m, off-axis Gregorian (all reflective), alt-az mount.• Integrated adaptive optics.• Hybrid enclosure with thermal control and dust
mitigation.• Wavelength sensitivity from 0.3-28 microns (near-
UV through thermal infrared).• Field of view: 3 arcminutes.• Angular resolution < 0.03 arcsecond.• Polarization accuracy < 0.01%.
ATST will be the world’s flagship facility for ground-based solar physics observation and the first large US public-access solar telescope constructed in the past 30 years.
ATST—Completion 2018
10
Expanded Very Large Array
• VLA upgraded through the Expanded Very Large Array (EVLA) project– $94M: NSF, Canada, Mexico– NSF funding 2001 -> 2011– Scheduled for completion in
2012, on time and on budget– Same number of antennas.– All-new telescope
electronics.• Continuous frequency
coverage from 1–50 GHz • Exceedingly capable
Canadian correlator– Array data transmission via
fiber optics.• Shared-risk science now
Antarctic Astrophysics
• South Pole Telescope operations funded into 2012• Various smaller-scale astronomy projects• Operation of IceCube Neutrino Observatory 11
Move beyond the very successful NVO (international standards, software, data mining support, user interfaces, etc.) to a real astronomical observatory
NSF/NASA - Virtual Astronomical Observatory
“Just another observatory” where a wealth of detail is covered (hidden?) by the word “just”
VAO, LLC preliminary certification to receive federal funding agreed by NSF business office; NSF award made, May 2010; NASA contribution funded through existing centers
Strong link with Microsoft Research, World Wide Telescope product Research is being enabled – notable publications at
http://www.us-vo.org/pubs/notablepubs.cfm
Problem of marketing, branding12
The Dark Energy Survey Study Dark Energy using four
complementary* techniques: I. Cluster Counts II. Weak Lensing III. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations IV. Supernovae
Two multiband surveys: 5000 deg2 g, r, i, Z,Y to i~24 9 deg2 repeat (SNe)
Build new 3 deg2 cameraand Data Management system
DES 30% of 5 years of telescope Response to NOAO AO
DES Forecast: FoM up by 4.6
Blanco 4-meter at CTIO
*in systematics & in cosmological parameter degeneracies*geometric+structure growth: test Dark Energy vs. Gravity
13
LSST - four main science goals
Dark Energy and Dark Matter
The structure of our Galaxy
An inventory of the Solar System
Transient events
40Tb = 10-year Sloan, every night
10-year prime mission
50,000-200,000 transients per night – many per second
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Year
Total $563M in as-spent, then-year dollars (FY14 start: NSF $392M, DOE $132M, private $39M)
10 years at $40.5M (FY11), ~$600M in then-year dollars 14
Citizen Science• Exploit Human Computation
− It takes a person to interpreta complex image
• Novel data collection: – Citizen Science = Volunteer Science– e.g., Volunteer Geographic Information– e.g., Galaxy Zoo @ http://www.galaxyzoo.org/
• Citizen science: the involvement of volunteer non-professionals in the research enterprise. The experience must be engaging, must work with real scientific data and information, must address authentic science research questions that are beyond the capacity of science teams and enterprises, and must involve the scientists.
15
Concluding Remarks
Astronomy funding in the U.S. is healthy, and will support a robust program
In the context of a budget that does not increase, any new initiatives will require decommissioning, or creative use, of existing facilities
It will be essential that we make the most effective scientific use of public, private, and international facilities
16