+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Water Infrastructure Debate

The Water Infrastructure Debate

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: gyula
View: 32 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The Water Infrastructure Debate. 2005 Urban Water Summit Albuquerque, New Mexico September 30 - October 1, 2005. NAWC – Who Are WE?. NAWC represents private and investor owned DW & WW utilities in US We serve 15-20 % of public, 20 million people - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
22
The Water Infrastructure Debate 2005 Urban Water Summit Albuquerque, New Mexico September 30 - October 1, 2005
Transcript
Page 1: The Water Infrastructure Debate

The Water Infrastructure Debate

2005 Urban Water SummitAlbuquerque, New MexicoSeptember 30 - October 1,

2005

Page 2: The Water Infrastructure Debate

NAWC – Who Are WE?NAWC represents private and investor owned DW & WW utilities in USWe serve 15-20 % of public, 20 million peopleNAWC currently has 161 DW utility members in 39 statesGenerally, the largest make up the NAWC’s current membership.

Page 3: The Water Infrastructure Debate

IntroductionI will talk about the infrastructure debate

What is society’s obligation to provide safe water?Who should pay, government or customers?What other issues are being debated?How has existing and proposed legislation addressed these issues?Do we need to change our culture in the water sector?

Page 4: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Society’s ResponsibilityMost would agree that society has a responsibility to assure its citizens have access to the essential prerequisites of life:

Safe waterSanitationFoodShelterClothing

Page 5: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Nothing is FreeProviding prerequisites requires considerable investment of resourcesNo one argues that food, shelter, and clothing should be free or heavily subsidized to all members of societySome argue that safe water and sanitation should be

Page 6: The Water Infrastructure Debate

How should we Pay?What is best way to assure all get the essential prerequisites?

Those who can afford it should pay the market priceThose who cannot afford the market price should get subsidies

Page 7: The Water Infrastructure Debate

The Debate about Who Pays

Should government rather than customers pay?What do other utility models tell us?

Other utilities are economically independentMost customers pay full cost of service ratesOnly targeted subsidies are used

Page 8: The Water Infrastructure Debate

The Debate about Who Pays

What kind of federal/state assistance is appropriate?

For the typical utility with reasonable economies of scale - low interest state revolving loansFor the economically disadvantaged - bill subsidiesFor small remote communities that are very costly to serve - grants

Page 9: The Water Infrastructure Debate

What Else are We Debating?

Need to stimulate comprehensive infrastructure planning and continuous investment Privately owned WW utilities should be made eligible for wastewater SRF loansNeed to stimulate consideration of

ConsolidationPublic-private partnerships

Page 10: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Consolidation often Resisted

Physical or managerial consolidation often fiercely resisted by local interests Where public health is jeopardized, states must step in and force an appropriate solution

Page 11: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Federal Impediments to PPP have been Eliminated

Executive Order 12803 Executive Order 12893 (59 FR 4233) IRS Rule 97-13 EPA Guidance on Privatization of Federally Funded Wastewater Utilities

Page 12: The Water Infrastructure Debate

How Have these Issues under Debate Been

Addressed in Recent Bills?

Page 13: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Water Legislation – Currently in Force

SDWA Amendments (1996)Clean Water Act (1987)

Page 14: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Water Legislation – Historical Bills

S. 1961 (2002)HR 3930/HR 1560 (2002/2003)

S. 2550 (2004)

Page 15: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Water Legislation – Pending Bills

S. 1400 (2005)HR 1708 – Water PABs(2005)

Page 16: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Do we need to Change our Culture?

Some believe DW & WW services should be heavily subsidized through grants

They argue that rates cannot be raised any more Grants subsidize all customers, even those who can afford higher ratesSuch subsidies send the wrong price signals and discourage conservation

Page 17: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Do we need to Change our Culture?

Some are waiting on the government to bail them outDeferring critical rate and infrastructure investment decisionsBudget realities preclude significant federal assistance except for emergencies

Page 18: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Do we need to Change our Culture?

The longer we defer the more the ultimate cost will escalateWe also risk jeopardizing public health & customer service

Page 19: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Do we need to Change our Culture?

Those responsible for water service must not use a federal bailout as an excuse for inactionPrivately owned utilities must go to their PUCs for rate increases to cover the needed investmentsPublicly owned utilities must go to their city councils, mayors, county executives or oversight boards

Page 20: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Do we need to Change our Culture?

Inaction will implicate all parties in the inevitable service failuresAs recent shortcomings in hurricane relief have shown, responsible officials will pay the price for failure

Page 21: The Water Infrastructure Debate

How to Make the Case

AWWA and the WEF developing resources to help utility managers make the case for rate increases to fund the investmentsRecently these organizations have been reaching out directly to mayors and other decision makers

Page 22: The Water Infrastructure Debate

Avoiding a Crisis is in our Hands

If utilities continue to defer, a crisis is inevitable It will be seen as a failure of leadership at the local levelWe know what needs to be done and if we don’t do it, we will not be able to avoid the fallout


Recommended