+ All Categories
Home > Documents > THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in...

THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in...

Date post: 31-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: tia-wiler
View: 220 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
19
THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan
Transcript
Page 1: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

THEO FARRELLDEPT OF WAR STUDIES

KING’S COLLEGE LONDON

The British military campaign in Afghanistan

Page 2: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

ISAF takes over

Page 3: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.
Page 4: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

British task forces, 2006-2006

16 bde: May–Oct 2006

3 cdo: Oct 2006–April 07

12 Mech: April–Oct 2007

52 bde: Oct 2007–April 2008

16 bde: April–Oct 2008

Page 5: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

British brigades in Helmand

16 bde: ‘inkspot’ to platoon house

3 cdo: offensive using MOGs

12 Mech: big sweeps to clear green zone

52 bde: ‘clear, hold, build’

16 bde: protecting population and developing GIROA

Page 6: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

16x: break-in battle

Force cap (3,150 + 1500)Losing momentum: parcel deliveryPressure to deploy NorthPOR: “undoubtedly contributed to attrition of

Taliban forces”But fixed and kinetic

Page 7: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.
Page 8: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

16x: break-in battle

Force cap (3,150 + 1500)Losing momentum: parcel deliveryPressure to deploy NorthPOR: “undoubtedly contributed to attrition of

Taliban forces”But fixed and kinetic

Page 9: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

3x: advance to ambush

Main effort = reconstruction of ADZMain LOO = securitySecurity LOO = “dynamic unpredictability”“Tread softly”: 537 to 821 engagementsKeeping the Taliban at bay: 45% reduction in

attacks

Page 10: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

12x: mowing the lawn

Return to original plan: inkspot strategyClearing the green zone: 5 TF opsFailure to holdEscalation: 821 to 1,096 engagements

Page 11: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

The Green Zone

Page 12: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

12x: mowing the lawn

Return to original plan: inkspot strategyClearing the green zone: 5 TF opsFailure to holdEscalation: 821 to 1,096 engagements

Page 13: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

52x: people are the prize

CONOPs = clear, hold, buildCOG = local population (not EF)Persistent presence: committing FOBsResourcing influence: NKETs and TCAFApproach to battle: taking MSQ

Page 14: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

Tactical Conflict Assessment Framework

1. Have there been changes in the village population, and why?

2. What are the most important problems facing the village?

3. Who do you believe can solve your problems?

4. What should be done first?

Page 15: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

16x: go deep not broad

CONOPS: protect the population, promote GIROA, undermine Taliban influence

Creating CMMHKajaki Damn op

Page 16: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

More favourable context

New Taliban tacticsGrowing ANA capabilitiesIncreased resources

Page 17: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

Better resourced campaign

16 bde (mid 2006): 3,150

3 cdo (2006-07): 5,200

12 Mech (mid 2007): 6,500

52 bde (2007-08): 7,750

16 bde (mid 2008): 8,530

Page 18: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

Characteristics of British approach

Slow learnerCracking-on: make do attitudeDiscontinuity of command

Page 19: THEO FARRELL DEPT OF WAR STUDIES KING’S COLLEGE LONDON The British military campaign in Afghanistan.

The long haul

Natural cycle: wearing down the Taliban

Building up GIROA capacityLearning to be ComprehensiveSustainable victory


Recommended