+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in...

Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in...

Date post: 01-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: douglas-hudson
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
46
Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)
Transcript
Page 1: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Theories of Language Learning

(a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Page 2: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Behavouristic Theory

• It is believed that theory is vital for teachers because it provides insight into why studs respond to instruction in certain ways “How lg is learnt?”

• Allwright “Why don’t lners learn what teachers teach?”

• While lrng theory may not allow us to predict or explain all the variations in lners, it can provide a framework for u/standg commonalities among studs and possible reasons for ind’l variations.

Page 3: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Different Instructional approaches are based on explicit or implicit beliefs abt human lrng – hw lg is learnt.

• Many systems of c/room management / tchg app are based on the behavioural theory that emphasizes the pairing of appropriate stimuli and rewards to desired responses…(what a tchr & trainer needs)

Page 4: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• STIMULUS

• RESPONSE

CORRECT INCORRECT

+ve reinforcement -ve reinforcement

eg. Reward/ eg.Punishment/

compliments correction

(immediately – bad

habit isn’t formed)

Page 5: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Stimulus

Response

Reinforcement

Repetitions(habit formation)

* Lg lrng is a habit formation process

Page 6: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Behaviouristic Theory of Learning

• For decades, behaviouristic & Skinnerian lrng theory had a great impact on foreign & SL tchg methodology (mtdlogy).

• It was believed that:– Human behaviour could be predicted and

controlled– Children come into this world with TABULA

RASA, a clean slate bearing no pre-conceived notions abt the world / lg.

Page 7: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

– They are then shaped by their environment, slowly conditioned through various schedules of reinforcement

– Lg – a form of behaviour– Lg lrng - a habit formation

Page 8: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Learning Model (SRR)

• Stimulus response reinforcement

• Repetitions – habit formation & lrng

• Reinforcement or rewards is :– Very important in the early stages of lrng– Should be given frequently

Page 9: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Each step in the lrng process should be as small as possible so that correct behaviour is reinforced with rewards.

• Mistakes are corrected immediately, eg. Audio-Lingual Method (50’s & 60’s)

• It was claimed that a carefully designed programme of step by step reinforcement could teach virtually any sbjct matter effectively & successfully.

Page 10: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Lg lrng, often in the form of lg stimuli, provided the first input. Lners were expected to adapt to this ‘input’.

• As a result, most rschers concentrated on app or methods of tchg or instruction, which would bring abt effective lg acquisition.

Page 11: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Paradigm Shift

• Now, the change is from:– Teacher to lner

– Teaching to learning

– Tchg methods to lrng methods

Page 12: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Since the early seventies, the focus of foreign and 2nd lg studies has shifted from methods of tchg to:

– Lrng process– Lner characteristics– Their influence on 2nd lg acquisition

Page 13: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Gardner and Lambert (1972). Seminal research on attitude and motivation, pointed to the importance of affective factors.

• Schumann (1976) have found that social factors could determine the extent to which a non-native group may remain socially distant from the culture of the target lg group.

Page 14: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Since then, other personal chrcteristics of the lner such as intelligence, aptitude, personality, innovation and attitude, lrng styles and age, as well as the structures of the native and target lg and interaction opportunities with native speakers have all been found to affect 2nd lg lrng (Light Brown & Spada, 1993).

Page 15: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Besides the factors, cognitive science has offered some answers to how lners learn a 2nd lg and the lrng process.

• Approaches that call for higher level thinking and studs autonomy, such as LHTL model are based on cognitive lrng theory.

Page 16: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Lrng Theories Supporting the Use & Development of

Lrng Strategies

Page 17: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• A) Cognitive lrng models which focus on lners’ mental process

• B) Social – Cognitive models which investigate the roles of interaction between individuals and group processes in lrng

Page 18: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Cognitive Model of Lrng

• So far, linguistic theories have assumed that lg is lrned separately from cognitive skills.

• However, O’Malley & Chamot (1990:16), who are responsible for advancing a cognitive – based theory in 2nd lg acqstn (SLA), have concluded that SLA cannot be u/stood without adressg the interaction btwn lg & cognition.

Page 19: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• According to Steven,

– LEARNING – is the act of obtaining k/ledge in a formal context. (eg. c/room – lrng in class)

– ACQUISITION – is the act of obtaining k/ledge through natural setting.

Page 20: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Cognitive Learning Theories

• Anderson’s Information Processing Theory

K/ledge / Informatn

Static Info Dynamic Info

Declarative K/ledge Procedural K/ledge

(eg. Facts/rules (gmmr) (eg. Lrng strategies)

Page 21: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Anderson’s informtn processg theory of cognition and memory, was reviewed and it is found that this theory could be used for explaining SLA.

• It is also found that cognitive theory could be extended to describe lrng strategies as complex cognitive skills. More over, viewing lg acquisition as a cognitive skills provides how lg is lrnt.

Page 22: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Anderson (1983-1985) in O’ Malley & Chamot (1990:20) distinguishes btwn linguistic informtn stored as – “What we know abt somethg”, or static

informatn in memory know as “Declarative k/ledge”

– “What we know how to do smthg” or dynamic informtn in memory known as “Procedural k/ledge”

Page 23: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• The two types of k/ledge have diff roles in lg lrng:– Declarative K/ledge – consists of internalised

2nd lg (L2) rules and memorised chunks of lg. it is stored in the form of schemata, framework or as meaningful informtn of facts abt lg forms and functions.

– Procedural K/ledge – on the other hand, consists of the strategies and procedures employed by the lner to process L@ data for acquisition and for use. It serves as an informtn and processor to acquire bodies of informtn/ k/ledge in their environment.

Page 24: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Whereas, declarative k/ledge or factual informtn may be acquired quickly, procedural k/ledge such as lg acquisition is acquired gradually and only with extensive opportunities for practise.

• Therefore, to attain procedural k/ledge or complex cognitive skills, lners, need to develop their skills in thinkg and learn how to use strategies specific to lrng.

Page 25: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Lners use lrng strategies when they are involved in mental actvts such as ‘analysing data to form abstractions, concepts, generalisation and theories abt the lg they are lrng.

• Hence, it is logical to assume that lrng cannot take place without procedural k/ledge which plays a vital role in the lrng process. By employing and developing lrng strategies or procedural k/ledge, lners will ultimately “Learn How To Learn”.

• Cognitivism, emphasizes on the lners & their lrng process (How they organise their k/ledge). Lrng is an Active Mental Process.

Page 26: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Cognitive Lrng Theory

• Teaches how lners to analyse problems, how to think for themselves & how to employ and develop lrng strategies to learn.

• Aspects related to this theory:– Lner-centred– Discovery lrng– Inductive & Deductive lrng– Errors as integral part of lrng– Lg awareness– Consciousness-raising– Strategy training

Page 27: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Social – Cognitive Models of Learning

• Lrng does not take place in a vacuum. Factors other than the lner’s thoughts or cognitions can effect lrng.

• Social – cognitive models focus not only on the individual lner, but also on the social nature of lrng and other factors.

Page 28: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory

• Lrng is based on complex, reciprocal interactions among behaviour, environment and personal factors.

• The theory emphasizes on the role of personal motivation – when a lner experiences success at a valued task, he or she develops a sense of self efficacy – a belief that one that one has the capability to succeed at the kind of task.

Page 29: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Motivation

Employing Employ

Lrng Lrng

Strategies Success Strategies

Self-efficacy

Page 30: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Self efficacy can in turn, affect whether the student is willing to try a task, as well as the stud’s persistence at the task, thoughts during the task and eventual performance (Bandura, 1997)

• Using appropriate strategies can help build self-efficacy by creating success experiences and by giving studs the tools for future successes.

Page 31: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Research by Chamot, found that foreign lg studs with high self-efficacy use more lrng strategies than do foreign lg studs with low self-efficacy.

Success, Self-efficacy,

Strategy (to improve performance)

• During strategies instruction, it is critical that tchrs ensure that studs see how each strategy help them experience success. This success will, in turn develop their feelings of self-efficacy.

Page 32: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Humanistic Psychology in Language Learning

Page 33: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Krashen says “Affective Filter Theory”– When lners are happy and like the teachg, the

affective filter goes down.– Affective Theory Factors

Emotions / Feelings– Besides Cognitive lrng theory, Carl Rogers’

Humanistic psychology has a significant impact on our u/stdg of lg lrng, particularly in pedagogical context.

Page 34: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• He focused on the development of an individual’s self-concept and of his or her personal sense of reality, which causes a person to act.

• Given a non-threatening environment, he believed that human beings are able to adapt and grow in the direction that enhances their existence.

Page 35: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• The focus of humanistic psychology is away from “teaching” and towards “learning”.

• According to Rogers, tchrs should only be facilitators of lrng.

• LHTL is more important than being ‘taught’ something from the ‘superior advantage point of a tchr who unilaterally decides what shall be taught’.

Page 36: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Paolo Freira (1970 in Brown,1994:86) an educational theorist also argued that stus shld not be ‘spoon-fed’.

• They shld instead be allowed to ‘negotiate lrng outcomes, to cooperate with tchr and other lners in a process of discovery, to engage in critical thinking and to relate everything they do in school to their reality (outside the c/room).

Page 37: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Our present system of education in prescribing lrng goals and dictating tchg content, actually denies our stus’ both “freedom and dignity” and prevents them from taking responsibility for their own lrng.

Page 38: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Humanistic Tchg Model

• Stus’ attitude must be positive• Tchr’s role – create conducive, non –

threatening environment and develop stus’self-esteem

• materials – take into acc stus’ affective domain• Stus – set own goals and follow own pace• Experiental lrng / lrng by doing• Reasonable involvement / stimulation of feelings

and thinking / self-initiation / self-evaluation

Page 39: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

Language learning

Not knowg how to lrn – Negative behavior Syndromes.

Page 40: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Through LHTL or processing informtn using lrng strategies, man develops abstractions, learns a new skill and acquire a lg.

• If this is the case, according to Ng (1992:4), it is inherent in man to want to be involved in acts that bring the intellectual faculty to play, to use the mind to arrive at conclusion and draw inferences and to perform any mental operation to reason.

Page 41: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Thus it is important to nurture this use of the lrng strategies in human beings otherwise, not knowg HTL will result in -ve behaviour syndrome as identified by Ruth (1967 in Ng:1992:4).

Page 42: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Firstly, claimed Ruth, et all, one of the syndromes caused by a habitual disregard for the applictn of lrng strategies is “implusiveness”.

• Lners who are implusive do not think before acting or deliberate on the tasks at hand, nor do they “consider the problems and their alternatives”.

Page 43: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Secondly, these lners are overdependent on their tchr

– Inability to plan and to execute certain tasks

Page 44: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Another syndrome identified is the inability of lners to concentrate or pay attention to the task at hand and hence meetg failure in their work.

Page 45: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

• Lastly, Dogmatic and assertive behaviour is yet another syndromw which results in the lners making assertions that cannot stand up to critical examine or is not supported by evidence.

Page 46: Theories of Language Learning (a set of proponents –written/rsch done – that are authorised in their own and widely accepted)

The end wt main theories!!!


Recommended