of 23
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
1/23
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
1
Although managerial economics is not concerned solely with the
management of business firms, this is its principal field of application. Toapply managerial economics to business management, we need a theory of
the firm, a theory indicating how firms behave and what their goals are.
The concept of the firm plays a central role in the theory and practice of
managerial economics. An understanding of the reason for the existence of
firms, their specific role in the economy, and their objective provides a
background for that theory.
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
2/23
Reasons for the Existence of Firms and Their Functions
2
Firm exist because it would be very inefficient and costly for entrepreneurs to
enter into and enforce contracts with workers and owners of capital, land,
and other resources for each separate step of the production and distribution
process.
Firms often hire labour for long periods of time under agreements that
specify only that a wage rate per hour or day will be paid for the workers
doing what they are asked. The two parties do not have to negotiate a new
contract every time the worker is given a new assignment.
The saving of the transactions costs associated with such negotiations is
advantageous to both parties.
A firm is an organization that combines and organizes resources for thepurpose of producing goods and/or services for sale.
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
3/23
3
A second explanation for the existence of firms is that some governmentinterference in the market-place applies to transactions among firms rather
than within firms.
For example, sales taxes usually apply only to transactions between one firm
and another.
By internalizing some transactions within the firm that would otherwise be
subject to those interferences, production costs are reduced.
Because this is a secondary factor, firms would exist in the absence of such
interference, but it probably contributes to the existence of more and larger
firms.
Given that production costs are reduced by organizing production factors
into firms, why wont this process continue until there is one large firm?
Reasons for the Existence of Firms and Their Functions
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
4/23
4
There are at least two reasons: why wont the process continue until thereis one large firm?
First, the cost of organizing transactions within the firms tends to rise as the
firm gets larger. At some point, these internal transactions costs will equal
the cost of transacting in the market. At that point, the firm will cease to
grow.
A second factor constraining firm size is the limitation of an managements
ability to effectively control and direct the operation of the firm as it
becomes larger and larger.
Both of these reasons for a limit on the size of the firm fall under the
heading of what economists have termed diminishing returns to
management. Stated another way, production costs per unit of output will
tend to rise as firms grow larger, because of limited managerial ability.
Reasons for the Existence of Firms and Their Functions
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
5/23
5
The Objective of the Firm
To be able to discuss efficient or optimal decision making requires that a
goal or objective be established. That is, a management decision can only
be evaluated against the goal that the firm is attempting to achieve.
Originally, the theory of the firm was based on the assumption that thegoal of the firm was to maximize current or short-run profits. Firms,
however, are often observed to sacrifice short-term profits for the sake of
increasing future or long-term profits.
Since both short-term as well as long-term profits are clearly important,
the theory of the firm now suggests that the primary goal of the firm is to
maximize the wealth or value of the firm.
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
6/23
6
The Objective of the Firm (contd.)
Put briefly, a firms value will be defined here as the present value of its
expected future cash follows. For present purpose, we can regard a firms
cash flow as being the same as its profit.
Thus, expressed as an equation, the value of the firm equals
=
= + ... +
(1)
Present value of
expected profits
Where is the expected profit in the year t, iis the appropriate discount
rate used to find the present value of future profits, and t goes from 1
(next year) to n (the last year in the planning horizon).
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
7/23
7
The Objective of the Firm (contd.)
Because profit equals total revenue (TR) minus total cost (TC), this
equation can also be expressed as
Present value of
expected profits= (2)
Where is the firms total revenue in year t, and
is its total cost in year t.
To repeat, managerial economists generally assume that firms want to
maximize their value, as defined in equations (1) and (2).
However, this does not mean that a firm has complete control over its
value, and that it can set it at any level it chooses. On the contrary, firms
must cope with the fact that there are many constraints on what they can
achieve.
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
8/238
The Objective of the Firm (contd.)
The constraints that limit the extent to which a firms value can be
increased are of various kinds as given below:
i. Input Constraints: - The amount of certain types of inputs may be
limited. In the relevant period of time, the firm may be unable to obtain
more than a particular amount of specialized equipment, skilled labour,
essential materials, or other inputs.
ii. Legal Constraints: - Another important type of constraint that limits
what firms can do is legal in nature. A wide variety of laws (ranging from
environmental laws to antitrust laws to tax laws) limit what firms can do,
and the contracts and other legal agreement made by firms further
constrain their actions.
As indicated in figure given below, these constraints limit how much
profit a firm can make, as well as the value of the firm itself.
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
9/239
The Objective of the Firm (contd.)
Value of Firm
Input, legal and
other constraints
The value ofidepends on:
1 Riskiness of firm
2 Conditions in capital
market
The value of depends on:
1 Demand and forecasting
2 Pricing
3 New product development
The value of depends on:
1 Production Techniques
2 Cost of Production
3 Process Development
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
10/23
10
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
Limitations of the Theory of the Firm
The theory of the firm, which postulates that the goal or objective of
the firm is to maximize wealth or the value of the firm, has been
criticized as being much narrow and unrealistic.
In its place, broader theories of the firm have been proposed. The
most prominent among these are models that postulate that the
primary objective of the firm is the maximization of sales, the
maximization of management utility, and satisficing behaviour.
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
11/23
11
Sales Maximization Model
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
According to the sales-maximization model introduced by William Baumol
and others, managers of modern corporations seek to maximize sales after
an adequate rate of profit has been earned to satisfy stockholders.
Baumol argued that a larger firm may feel more secure, may be able to getbetter deals in the purchase of inputs and lower rates in borrowing money,
and may have a better image with consumers, employees, and suppliers.
Indeed, some early empirical studies found a strong correlation betweenexecutives salaries and sales, but not between salaries and profits. More
recent studies, however, found the opposite.
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
12/23
12
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
Williamsons Model of Managerial Discretion
The managerial theory of firm developed by Oliver E. Williamson states that
managers apply discretion in making and implementing policies to
maximize their own utility rather than trying for the maximization of profit
which ultimately maximizes the utility of owner shareholders. This is known
as the management utility maximization.
It postulates that with the advent of the modern corporation and the
resulting separation of management from ownership, managers are more
interested in maximizing their utility, measured in terms their compensation
(salaries, fringe benefits, stock options, etc.), the size of their staff, the
extent of control over the corporation, lavish offices, etc., than in
maximizing corporate profits.
This is referred to as the principal-agent problem. That is, the agent
(manager) may be more interested in maximizing his or her benefits than
maximizing the principals (the owners) interest.
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
13/23
13
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
Theory of Satisficing
The advocates of satisficing theory say that firms goal should be satisficing
rather than optimizing. Satisficing means acceptance of less than the best.
They argue that the behavior of real-world managers is not always
consistent with the profit-maximization goal.
Because of the great complexity of running the large modern corporation a
task often complicated by uncertainty and a lack of adequate data
managers are not able to maximize profits but can only strive for some
satisfactory goal in terms of sales, profits, growth, market share, and so on.
Simon called this satisficing behaviour. That is, the large corporation is a
satisficing, rather than a maximizing organization.
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
14/23
Cyert and Marchs Behavioral Theory
Cyert and March opined that a large-scale corporate type of firm exists these
days. Hence, entrepreneur cannot alone be a decision maker. The decision-
making involves a complex group or organization. It consists of various
individuals whose interest may conflict with each other.
The group is called organizational coalition and includes managers,
stockholders, workers, consumers and so on. All of these individuals participate
in setting the goals of an organization.
Unlike conventional theory of single goal, behavioral theory states that an
organization has multiple goals. The real world firm generally possesses the
following five goals:
14
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
15/23
15
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
Cyert and Marchs Behavioral Theory (contd.)
1. Production Goal: According to this goal, production should notfluctuate too much nor fall below an acceptable level. Because this
ensures stable employment, maintenance of adequate cost performance
and growth, the workers and those in production department have this
goal.
2. Inventory Goal: This goal originates mainly from the inventory
department, or from the sales and production departments. The sales
department needs enough stock of output for the customers, while the
production department requires adequate stocks of raw materials and
other items necessary for a uniform flow of the output.
3. Sales Goal: The sales goal is simply an aspirations with respect to the
level of sales. Particularly, this goal arises from salesmen, since their
success depends on their ability to maintain or expand the sales.
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
16/23
16
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
Cyert and Marchs Behavioral Theory (contd.)
4. Market-share Goal: This goal is an alternative to the sales goal andarises from the sales department. This department decides on the
advertising campaigns, the market research programmes, and so on.
5. Profit Goal: This goal is set by the top management in order to satisfy
the demands of shareholders and the expectations of bankers; and alsoto generate funds with which they can achieve their own goals and
projects, or satisfy the other goals of the firm.
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
17/23
17
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
Cyert and Marchs Behavioral Theory (contd.)
While making decisions, firms are guided by these five goals. The conflictamong different goals may come up. For example, sales goal may require
a lower price whereas the profit goal a higher price. Sales and production
goal may require high inventories whereas profit goal may require low
inventories. Such conflicts among coalition members are resolved within
the firm as a result of persuasion and accommodation of each others
viewpoint.
The firm in the behavioral theories seeks to satisficeoverall performance,
rather than maximize profits, sales or other magnitudes. The firm is a
satisficing organization rather than a maximizing entrepreneur. The top
management, accountable for the coordination of the activities of the
various members of the firm, want:
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
18/23
to attain a satisfactory level of production,
to attain a satisfactoryshare of the market,
to earn a satisfactory level of profit
to divert a satisfactory percentage of their total receipts to research
and development or to advertising,
to acquire a satisfactory public image, and so on.
But, it is not clear in the behavioral theories what is a satisfactory and
what an unsatisfactory attainment is.
18
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
Cyert and Marchs Behavioral Theory (contd.)
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
19/23
Means for the Resolution of Conflicts:
The top management uses different methods to resolve the
conflicts within the firm. The means for the resolution of conflicts are:
delegation of authority,
budget determination, monetary payments like wages, salary and dividend,
side payment given to the scientist of research department in addition to
regular salary,
slack payments it is defined as payments to the various groups of thecoalition above than the payments required for efficient working of the
firm.
fulfilling demand according priority,
decentralization of decision-making.
19
THE THEORY OF THE FIRM
Cyert and Marchs Behavioral Theory (contd.)
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
20/23
20
THE CONCEPT OF ECONOMIC PROFIT
Practically all published profit figures are based on the accountants
definition of profits. This notion of profit is relatively straightforward: Profit
is defined as total revenue minus explicit costs. This is known as accounting
profit.
When economists speak of profit, they mean profit after taking account
foregone incomes - interest, salary and rent of the resources owned and
used by entrepreneur of which there is no direct payment. They are
included in implicit cost. The implicit cost means opportunity cost.
The profit arrived at by deducting imputed costs from accounting profit can
be called as economic profit.
Economic profit = Accounting profit Imputed cost (Implicit cost).
Following example makes clear the underlying difference between these
two concepts accounting and economic profit.
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
21/23
21
Robin Singh, a SMC graduate, has planned to invest Rs 2, 00, 000, which he has
kept in a bank at 5% interest rate, in a poultry firm in Gitanagar in own land. The
accountant prepares such income statement for one year:
THE CONCEPT OF ECONOMIC PROFIT
The use of this concept may lead to wrong decision. The firm making profit from
accounting viewpoint may have been incurring loss from economic viewpoint.
Hence, only the concept of economic profit is relevant in decision-making.
The implicit cost considered by the economist is related to the opportunities
foregone. Hence such costs should be included for rational decision-making. Three
important implicit costs in above example are:
Sales Rs. 50,000
Less: Cost of goods sold Rs. 20,000
Gross profit Rs. 30,000
Less: Advertising Rs. 1,000
Depreciation Rs. 1,000Utilities Rs. 1,000Miscellaneous expenses Rs. 2,000 Rs. 5,000
Net accounting profit Rs. 25,000
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
22/23
22
a. The investment of Rs. 2, 00,000 investment would return Rs. 10,000
annually @ 5% interest rate. Thus, Rs. 10, 000 should be considered as theimplicit or opportunity cost of having the Rs. 2, 00,000 invested in the
poultry firm.
THE CONCEPT OF ECONOMIC PROFIT
b. Second implicit cost is the management's time and talent. If the annual
wage return of Robin is Rs 90, 000. This is the implicit cost of managing
this business rather than working for someone else.
c. Forgone annual rent is Rs. 24, 000 of the house owned and used by
Robin.
Hence, the above income statement should be amended in the following
way in order to determine economic profit:
7/30/2019 Theory of the Firm 2003
23/23
23
THE CONCEPT OF ECONOMIC PROFIT
Net economicprofit Rs. (-) 99, 000
Sales Rs. 50,000
Less: Cost of goods sold Rs. 20,000
Gross profit Rs. 30,000
Less: Advertising Rs. 1,000
Depreciation Rs. 1,000
Utilities Rs. 1,000
Miscellaneous expenses Rs. 2,000 Rs. 5,000Net accounting profit Rs. 25,000
Return on invested capital Rs. 10, 000
Foregone wages Rs. 90, 000
Foregone rent Rs. 24, 000 Rs. 1, 24,000
Less: Implicit costs:
From this broader prospective, the business is projected to lose Rs. 99, 000 in
the first year. The Rs. 25, 000 accounting profit disappears when all relevant
costs are included.