+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Date post: 24-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: elvin-watts
View: 215 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
45
Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?
Transcript
Page 1: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease:

Where are we in 2012?

Page 2: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Classic management of CD is sequential

Page 3: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

A competing treatment concept!

Page 4: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Most Crohn’s disease patients will require surgery

Page 5: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Mortality in Crohn’s disease

Page 6: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Case presentation: Active CD

Page 7: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Endoscopy shows both TI and cecal involvement

Page 8: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Endoscopic image showing deep ulcerations

Page 9: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study (NCCDS): Induction of remission in Crohn's disease

Page 10: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Mesalamine (5-ASA): Induction of remission in Crohn's disease

Page 11: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

5-ASA for induction of remission in Crohn's disease: A meta-analysis

Page 12: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Corticosteroids in IBD

Page 13: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Budesonide absorption and metabolism

Page 14: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Budesonide vs mesalamine: Induction of remission

Page 15: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Azathioprine (AZA) maintenance therapy after corticosteroid-induction in Crohn's disease

Page 16: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Combination induction therapy 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) + prednisone

Page 17: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Rates of surgery for CD and the use of immunosuppressives over 3 decades

Page 18: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Methotrexate: Widely used to treat severe arthritis in the past

Page 19: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Methotrexate results: Remission

Page 20: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Results: Time to relapse

Page 21: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Anti-TNFα-inhibitors

Page 22: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease

Page 23: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Adalimumab + methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: PREMIER study

Page 24: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Remission rate at Week 52 in CHARMby immunosuppressive use

Page 25: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Azathioprine monotherapy vs infliximab + azathioprine in steroid-dependent CD

Page 26: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Early combination therapy vs conventional management of Crohn’s disease

Page 27: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Use of drug with conventional or early aggressive therapy

Page 28: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Early aggressive therapy vs conventional management of Crohn’s disease

Page 29: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Early combination therapy vs conventional management of Crohn’s disease:

Complete disappearance of ulceration

Page 30: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

SONIC: Clinical remission without corticosteroids at Week 26

Page 31: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Optimum efficacy by treatment of patientswith objective measures of inflammation

Page 32: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Schematic overview of COMMITT trial design

Page 33: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

COMMITT: Proportion of patients with treatment success

Page 34: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

OK, so we just treat everyone with combination therapy forever!!??

Page 35: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Predictors of rapid progressionto surgery

Page 36: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Prognosis of CD patients with severe colonic ulceration

Page 37: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Positive serology and risk of progression

Page 38: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

High risk patients should be considered for early treatment with combined therapy

Page 39: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Back to our CD case

Page 40: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Kaplan-Meier CD-related hospitalization: CHARM

Page 41: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Safety data from the TREAT registry

Page 42: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Lymphoma risk and IBD

Lymphoma risk is well established

Special case of HTCL

Non-melanoma skin cancer similarly elevated

Highly concerning to patients

Page 43: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Methotrexate and lymphoma risk

“The hypothesis that disease-modifying drugs, and in particular methotrexate, would increase the lymphoma risk receives little support.”

Baecklund et al, Current Opinion Rheumatology 2004; 16(3): 254–61

“Insufficient data are available to fully assess the risk of lymphoma and malignancies, although there is no strong evidence of increased risk.”

Salliot & van der Heijde, Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 1100–4

“Recent work suggests that it is the disease itself, not its treatment, that is associated with increased risk of lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.”

Kaiser, Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma 2008; 8(2): 87–93

Page 44: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?
Page 45: Therapeutic algorithms for Crohn’s disease: Where are we in 2012?

Four emerging concepts in CD

Objective evidence of the presence of inflammation should drive clinical decision making, not the presenceof symptoms in isolation

The pharmacokinetics of TNFα-inhibitors are complex and therapy should be optimized for individual patients

Combining antimetabolite therapy and a TNFα-inhibitor results in optimal efficacy and protects the latter against sensitization

Step-care is obsolete (CD vs UC?)


Recommended