Thermochronology, geochronology, and upper crustal ... · PDF fileStructural Geology [9] Three...

Thermochronology, geochronology, and upper crustal structure

of the Cordillera Real: Implications for Cenozoic exhumation

of the central Andean plateau

Robert J. Gillis,1,2 Brian K. Horton,1,3 and Marty Grove1

Received 14 July 2005; revised 8 January 2006; accepted 26 July 2006; published 21 December 2006.

[1] Structural mapping, 40Ar/39Ar and fission trackthermochronology, U-Pb geochronology, and basinanalysis reveal rapid cooling during middle Eocene–late Oligocene and late Miocene–Pliocene exhumationin the central Andean plateau of Bolivia. In the 4–6 km high Cordillera Real, numerous granites andSW directed fold-thrust structures define the centralAndean backthrust belt along the Altiplano–EasternCordillera boundary. U-Pb zircon analyses indicatePermo-Triassic granitic magmatism, with less extensivemagmatism of late Oligocene age. Mapping revealslow magnitudes of slip (<2–5 km) for most faults onthe basis of unit thicknesses, stratigraphic separation,and cutoff relationships. These results suggest that adeeper structure was probably involved in exhumationof rocks from >5 km depth. The �26 Ma QuimsaCruz granite postdated most thrust structures,suggesting that upper crustal shortening in theCordillera Real had largely ceased by late Oligocenetime. Results of 40Ar/39Ar and fission track modelinghelp constrain the moderate to low-temperature(<350�C) cooling history, revealing two phases ofrapid cooling from 45–40 Ma to 26 Ma and from�11 Ma onward. Initial cooling coincided withmiddle Eocene–late Oligocene deformation in thebackthrust belt and associated deposition of coarseclastic sediments in the Altiplano basin. Eocene-Oligocene exhumation of �7.5 km of upper crust isestimated on the basis of thermochronologic data.Rapid late Miocene and younger cooling involved anestimated �3.5 km of exhumation and occurred in theapparent absence of upper crustal shortening. Thesefindings suggest that crustal shortening and resultantexhumation of middle Eocene–late Oligocene ageplayed a major role in construction of the central

Andes. However, for late Miocene exhumation, theimportance of alternative, nonshortening mechanismsis difficult to ascertain due to a poor understanding ofsubsurface structures. We speculate that greaterprecipitation on the eastern edge of the centralAndean plateau north of �17.5�S was a key factor indriving rapid, youthful exhumation of the CordilleraReal. Citation: Gillis, R. J., B. K. Horton, and M. Grove

(2006), Thermochronology, geochronology, and upper crustal

structure of the Cordillera Real: Implications for Cenozoic

exhumation of the central Andean plateau, Tectonics, 25,

TC6007, doi:10.1029/2005TC001887.

1. Introduction

[2] The Cordillera Real forms high topography in one ofthe most intensely shortened and thickened region of theAndes [Dorbath et al., 1993; Baby et al., 1997; Beck andZandt, 2002]. At 4–6.4 km altitude, the range marks boththe eastern topographic margin of the central Andeanplateau, defined as the low-relief, generally internallydrained region above 3 km [Isacks, 1988], and the structuralboundary between the Altiplano and Eastern Cordilleraprovinces (Figure 1). As the principal divide separatingthe closed Altiplano basin and Amazon drainage system, theCordillera Real has profoundly influenced orographic pre-cipitation, regional climate, and geomorphic evolution ofthe central Andes [Masek et al., 1994; Horton, 1999;Montgomery et al., 2001]. The range also occupies thetransition from hinterland- to foreland-directed thrust struc-tures [McQuarrie and DeCelles, 2001; McQuarrie, 2002]and coincides with a lithospheric boundary possibly repre-senting an ancient suture zone [Dorbath et al., 1993].Furthermore, uplift of the Cordillera Real presumablyhelped dictate the Cenozoic sedimentation history of theAltiplano [Sempere et al., 1990; Horton et al., 2001, 2002].[3] Despite its fundamental role in construction of the

central Andean plateau, the timing, magnitude, and style ofdeformation, and associated exhumation and basin devel-opment remain poorly understood. Multiple granitic bodiescompose the Cordillera Real, but disagreement persists overemplacement ages and subsequent cooling histories [e.g.,McBride et al., 1983;Miller, 1988;Miller and Harris, 1989;Lamb and Hoke, 1997]. Previous thermochronologicresults, notably the fission track data of Benjamin et al.[1987], have been variably interpreted to suggest an Eocene

TECTONICS, VOL. 25, TC6007, doi:10.1029/2005TC001887, 2006ClickHere

for

FullArticle

1Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, LosAngeles, California, USA.

2Now at the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys,Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.

3Now at the Department of Geological Sciences and Institute forGeophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin,Austin, Texas, USA.

Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.0278-7407/06/2005TC001887$12.00

TC6007 1 of 22

Figure 1

TC6007 GILLIS ET AL.: EXHUMATION OF THE CENTRAL ANDEAN PLATEAU

2 of 22

TC6007

pulse of heating, Eocene pulse of cooling, uniform Eoceneto modern cooling, Miocene linear or stepwise increase incooling, and late Miocene exponential increase in cooling[Benjamin, 1986; Benjamin et al., 1987; Masek et al., 1994;Lamb and Hoke, 1997; Safran, 1998; Moore and England,2001; Anders et al., 2002]. These conflicting interpretationsdemonstrate the large uncertainties in the exhumation his-tory of the Cordillera Real. An accurate record is essentialfor understanding mountain building and plateau evolutionin the central Andes, and the interactions among tectonics,erosion, and climate.[4] The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the exhumation

record of the Cordillera Real along three mapping traverses at16–17�S.Widespread granite exposures afford opportunitiesto assess the range’s cooling history and crosscutting relation-ships with newly identified structures. U-Pb zircon analysesconstrain Permo-Triassic and late Oligocene granite emplace-ment ages, and 40Ar/39Ar, apatite fission track, and applicablemodeling results provide a record of exhumation-inducedcooling. These results indicate rapid cooling during middleEocene to early Miocene time, considerably earlier thangenerally assumed. Exhumation of this age is consistent withsediment provenance data for clastic fill in the northernAltiplano basin dated between 34 and 24 Ma by new40Ar/39Ar results for interbedded tuffs. Collectively, thesefindings require revision of previous estimates for the timingof initial topographic expression and tempo of exhumationalong the eastern margin of the central Andean plateau.

2. Geologic Setting

[5] The Cordillera Real is a 30 � 250 km range along theeastern flank of the central Andean plateau (Figure 1). Thisrugged, glaciated range represents the highest nonvolcanictopography in Bolivia, with average elevations of �5 kmand major peak elevations of 6.1–6.4 km. Although it formsthe NW trending divide between the Amazon drainage andinternally drained Altiplano, the range has been breachedlocally by headward erosion of the Rio La Paz, a tributary ofthe Amazon. The entire range is recognized as the Cordil-lera Real, but high topography southeast of the Rio La Pazis commonly identified separately as the Quimsa Cruz(Figure 1a).[6] The Cordillera Real lies within the Huarina fold-

thrust belt (HFTB) of the westernmost Eastern Cordillera(Figure 1). The HFTB represents part of the W to SWdirected central Andean backthrust belt that extends from 15to 22�S in the hinterland of the central Andes [Newell, 1949;Pareja et al., 1978; Martinez, 1980; Roeder, 1988; Sempereet al., 1990; McQuarrie and DeCelles, 2001]. Ordovicianstrata are the structurally lowest rocks exposed and definean axis between a NE directed thrust system and the SWdirected backthrust belt. Younger rocks in the HFTB include

Upper Devonian with limited Carboniferous and Cretaceousrocks. Frontal thrusts of the HFTB, including the SWdirected Huarina and Coniri faults (Figure 1b), place Paleo-zoic rocks on mainly mid-Cenozoic strata, but are com-monly covered by younger Altiplano fill [Sempere et al.,1990; Marsh et al., 1992].[7] In this study, three NE-SW transects were mapped at

1:50,000 scale to provide shortening estimates and a struc-tural framework for interpreting thermochronologic results.The 20–40 km long transects are orthogonal to structuraltrends and continue northeastward from the Altiplano mar-gin. The northern (Amaguaya), central (Rio Zongo), andsouthern (Quimsa Cruz) traverses contain similar structuresand extensive granites that intrude mainly Ordovician-Silurian rocks (Figures 2 and 3). Low-grade metamorphicconditions affected Paleozoic strata, producing slate, phyl-lite, and minor quartzite [Martinez, 1980]. The main strati-graphic units include: Upper Ordovician Coroico (�2300 m)and Amutara (�800 – 3300 m) formations; SilurianCancaniri (�100–335 m), Uncia (�900–1300 m), andCatavi (480–600 m) formations; Devonian Vila Vila For-mation (�700–850 m); and local occurrences of Carbonif-erous, Permian, and Cretaceous units [Servicio Geologico deBolivia (Geobol), 1993, 1995, 1997; McQuarrie andDeCelles, 2001]. Major decollement horizons are in theCoroico, Uncia, and Cancaniri formations.[8] Granites in the Cordillera Real are of Permo-Triassic

and mid-Cenozoic age. In the north, four Permo-Triassicintrusions occupy the highest parts of the range: the Illampuand Yani plutons in the northern transect and the HuaynaPotosı and Zongo plutons in the central transect (Figure 2).Although not continuously exposed, these mineralogicallysimilar two-mica granites may be genetically related[McBride et al., 1983]. Whereas the Illampu and HuaynaPotosı granites are generally nonfoliated and medium-grained, the Zongo granite is much coarser with a pervasiveNE dipping foliation; foliation in the medium-grained Yanigranite only occurs locally along its NE margin. In the south,the Quimsa Cruz pluton cuts Paleozoic rocks (Figure 3) andis composed of a nonfoliated granodiorite and a porphyriticmonzogranite.

3. Structural Geology

[9] Three mapping transects (Figures 1–3) were selectedto maximize exposure, relief, and accessibility. Most struc-tures fall into three categories: (1) NE dipping faults cuttingPaleozoic strata with hanging wall on footwall thrust cutoffgeometries ranging from ramp on ramp to flat on flat; (2)steeply NE dipping faults cutting granites with possiblehanging wall ramp on footwall ramp thrust relationships;and (3) fault-bend, fault propagation, and buckle folds inPaleozoic strata. Tentative fault slip estimates are made on

Figure 1. (a) Regional topography of the central Andes showing boundaries (dashed lines) between majortectonomorphic zones [after McQuarrie et al., 2005a]. Darker colors define high topography (>4.5 km) of CordilleraReal. (b) Regional geologic map of the Cordillera Real and surrounding regions of the central Andean backthrust belt alongthe Eastern Cordillera–Altiplano boundary. Areas of white shading show extent of three mapping transects. CRFZ,Cordillera Real fault zone.


3 of 22

TC6007

Figure 2


4 of 22

TC6007

the basis of stratigraphic separation, unit thicknesses, faultcutoff relationships, and inferred geometries at depth. Crosssections (Figure 4) are not balanced and are presented onlyas representations compatible with mapped surface struc-tures; alternative interpretations are permissible.

3.1. Northern Transect: Amaguaya Region

[10] Permo-Triassic granites intrude the OrdovicianAmutara Formation (Oam) and are cut by steeply NEdipping thrusts along the northern transect. The moderatelySW dipping Amaguaya thrust marks the northern edge ofthe transect (Figures 2 and 4a). A prominent fault in themiddle of the transect places the Yani pluton over theIllampu pluton; regionally, this fault separates gently dip-ping Oam strata and low-amplitude fold trains in the NEfrom steeply NE dipping Oam strata in the SW (Figure 2).The southern edge of the transect consists of folded andthrusted slates of the Silurian Cancaniri Formation (Scc)along the eastern margin of the Altiplano. The lack ofcutoffs within granites and stratigraphic uncertainties pre-clude shortening estimates for this transect.3.1.1. NE Part: Amaguaya Thrust[11] The principal NE directed thrust in the region cuts

the NE margin of the Yani pluton (AA, Figure 2). This fault,

here named the Amaguaya thrust, is defined by a SWdipping (49–54�) �10–20 cm wide ductile shear zoneenveloped within an �200 m wide brittle shear zone. Inboth hanging wall and footwall, pervasive fractures and awell-developed foliation in the Yani granite dip 20–70�SW.Shear sense indicators and slickenlines (stereonets, Figure 2)indicate top-to-NE transport. In map view, the fault traceprojects to the ESE into shallowly dipping OrdovicianAmutara (Oam) strata that occur in both hanging wall andfootwall, suggesting limited stratigraphic separation. A lackof Oam marker horizons precludes slip estimates.3.1.2. ENE Part: Ordovician Rocks[12] The ENE part of the transect is dominated by

shallowly dipping Oam strata. Oam is in intrusive contactwith the Yani granite (AB, Figure 2) except near the NEedge of the transect where it is in fault contact along a SWdipping thrust fault. The intrusive Oam-Yani contact paral-lels bedding and dips �4�NE over a �10 km distance (ABand AC). Low-amplitude NW trending folds are common inOam strata to the NE (AD). In the SSE, the Yani graniteintruded gently folded Oam strata (AC and AE) consideredto be the roof of the Yani pluton (AF). A potential Yani roofcontact (AB) is truncated by a NE dipping fault (AG) withonly �60 m of throw.

Figure 2. Geologic maps of northern (Amaguaya) and central (Rio Zongo) transects. Location is shown in Figure 1b.Black circles identify granite samples for thermochronologic studies. Lettered rectangles (AA–AM; ZA–ZM) identifylocations discussed in text. Stereonets represent fault orientation and slickenline data.

Figure 3. Geologic map of southern (Quimsa Cruz) transect. Location is shown in Figure 1b. Blackcircles identify granite samples for thermochronologic studies. Lettered rectangles (QA–QE) identifylocations discussed in text. Rose diagram represents joint and fracture orientations.


5 of 22

TC6007

3.1.3. Middle Part: Yani-Illampu Thrust[13] A major NE dipping (�63�) fault juxtaposes the

Yani and Illampu plutons (AH, Figure 2). This structure, theYani-Illampu thrust, continues >170 km to the NW andplaces Ordovician over Devonian rocks [Servicio Nacionalde Geologıa y Tecnico de Minas and YacimientosPetrolıferos Fiscales Bolivianos, 2003], a minimum strati-graphic separation of �5 km. Displacement decreases to theSE, with the Zongo granite and Oam strata thrust onto Oamrocks in a hanging wall flat on footwall ramp cutoffrelationship in the central transect (ZD, Figure 2).3.1.4. SW Margin of Illampu Granite[14] The SW margin of the Illampu pluton is generally in

fault contact with steeply NE dipping Oam strata. A NEdipping (�75�) strand of this fault (AI, Figure 2) is definedby fracture and gouge zones exhibiting slickensides ofvariable orientation. To the NW, the fault has been displaced�1 km by a NE striking left-lateral fault (AJ), consistentwith centimeter-scale left-lateral shear indicators (AK) andNE striking subvertical fractures with gently NE plunginglineations (AL).3.1.5. SW Part: Paleozoic Rocks[15] Steeply NE dipping strata in the SW are potentially

overturned near the Ordovician-Silurian contact (AM,Figure 2), although mud-draped ripple marks in the SilurianCancaniri Formation (Scc) show upright orientations locally.A proposed fault placing overturned, steeply NE dipping

Scc hanging wall rocks over relatively flat-lying Scc strataaccommodated an unknown amount of slip.

3.2. Central Transect: Rio Zongo Region

[16] Mapping of a series of NE dipping thrusts and thePermo-Triassic Zongo and Huayna Potosı granites along thecentral transect helps place thermochronologic data [e.g.,McBride et al., 1983, 1987; Benjamin et al., 1987] into astructural context (Figure 2 and 4b). Ordovician-Silurianstrata and the two plutons are well exposed at high eleva-tion, but mapping in more vegetated areas below �3.5 kmwas performed primarily by roadcut inspection along theZongo valley. Here, faults were identified locally andtentatively projected along strike using measured orienta-tions, topographic features, and satellite imagery.3.2.1. NE Part: Zongo Granite[17] In the NE, the Zongo pluton, Ordovician Coroico

(Ocr), and Amutara (Oam) formations are deformed bySW directed thrusts. Displacement is difficult to con-strain, but unit thicknesses indicate <2.5 km of strati-graphic separation for faults placing Ocr on footwall Ocrand Oam strata (ZA, Figure 2) [Geobol, 1995]. TheZongo granite intruded Oam rocks along its NE andSW margins [Heinrich, 1988] and is bisected by a NEdipping (63�) fault (ZB) that produced minimal offset ofthe SE pluton margin (ZC). Along its SW margin, theZongo granite is cut by a NE dipping fault (ZD) thatcorrelates with the Yani-Illampu thrust to the north (AH,

Figure 4. Schematic cross sections of mapped transects (locations shown in Figures 2 and 3).(a) Northern (Amaguaya) transect. (b) Central (Rio Zongo) transect. (c) Southern (Quimsa Cruz) transect.


6 of 22

TC6007

Figure 2). The SE continuation of this fault is unclear,but probably links with a fault in Oam strata (ZE).3.2.2. Middle Part: Paleozoic Rocks[18] South of the Zongo pluton, a SWdirected thrust places

an Oam hanging wall flat on an Oam footwall ramp (ZE,Figure 2). Hanging wall klippen are preserved�3 kmSSWofthe main fault trace (ZF). Mapped traces of the klippen areestimated on the basis of bedding-parallel fractures andbedding discordances observed from neighboring ridges.Correlation of the main fault trace and klippen suggests aNE to SWchange in the footwall from a 30�Ndipping ramp toan 11�N dipping flat. These relationships reveal a minimumdisplacement of �6.5 km, suggesting that this fault is one ofthe larger magnitude structures of the region.3.2.3. NE Margin of Huayna Potosı Granite[19] The trace of the northern contact of the Huayna

Potosı pluton across the Zongo valley and flanking ridges(ZG, Figure 2) is consistent with a N dipping contact.However, a localized <10 m wide fracture between graniteand Oam strata dips �65�SE with E trending striae,inconsistent with the mapped geometry. Additionally, boththe granite and Oam rocks occur locally on both sides of thefracture. Therefore the N margin of the Huayna Potosıgranite is not considered a major structure and is tentativelyinterpreted to be a modified intrusive contact with limitedthrust or strike-slip displacement.3.2.4. SW Margin of Huayna Potosı Granite[20] Along its SW edge, the Huayna Potosı granite sits in

the hanging wall of a low-angle (13�), NE dipping fault thatcuts NE dipping Oam strata (ZH, Figure 2). NE plungingfault striae indicate transport to the SW. The fault cutsdownsection to the SW across steeply dipping footwallstrata, suggesting out-of-sequence motion. In map view,the fault defines a small salient (ZH), requiring >1 km ofheave. A structural window reveals the NE continuation ofthe thrust (ZI), exposing a transition to a NE dipping (54�)footwall ramp where the Huayna Potosı granite occurs inboth hanging wall and footwall.3.2.5. Ordovician-Silurian Contact[21] Southwest of the Huayna Potosı granite, structures

near the Ordovician-Silurian contact include a SW vergent,thrust-cored anticline with steeply NE dipping Oam strata onthe NE limb. On the SW limb, Oam rocks are locally over-turned (ZJ, Figure 2) with overlying, SW dipping Scc stratacommonly exhibiting hematitic mineralization along thebasal contact (ZK). The anticline dies out along strike to theNW (ZJ). Kinematic indicators below themineralized contactinclude meter-scale, NE directed, ramp and flat fault geom-etries and top-to-NE folds (ZK). Mineralization and defor-mation may be related to bedding-parallel flexural slipassociated with SW vergent folding or tectonic wedging ofcompetent Oam quartzite beneath the Scc shale (ZXA,Figure 4b). The minimum shortening produced by the ex-posed fault propagation fold is 400 m, but wedge emplace-ment may have accommodated several additional kilometers.3.2.6. SW Part: Paleozoic Rocks[22] The dominant structures in the SW include two

faulted synclines containing the Silurian Catavi Formation(Sct) in their cores (ZL and ZM, Figure 2). Because the

Silurian Uncia Formation (Sun) appears to be relatively thin(�870 m) in this area (ZXB, Figure 4b), the Uncia sectionmust have been thickened in the southern syncline (ZM).Because Sun strata are tightly folded in this locality, the Sunwas likely thickened by internal deformation. Net slip in theSilurian section is estimated at >5 km.

3.3. Southern Transect: Quimsa Cruz Region

[23] NW trending structures (Figures 3 and 4c) are con-centrated in Paleozoic strata on the flanks of the mid-Cenozoic Quimsa Cruz pluton. Limited deformation affectedthe granite, which lacks foliation and truncates most NEdipping thrusts and associated folds.3.3.1. NE Part: Paleozoic Rocks[24] NE dipping panels of imbricated Silurian Uncia

(Sun) and Catavi (Sct) strata are exposed near the NEmargin of the Quimsa Cruz pluton (QA, Figure 3). Expo-sure is relatively poor, but a possible repetition of Sct rocksis interpreted on the basis of measured bedding orientationsand an assumed 500 m original stratigraphic thickness. Aprominent fault exposed near the NE margin of the granitedips NE (53�) with NE trending striae, but does notcontinue into the granite. A similar relationship is observed�1 km to the east where the granite apparently cuts a NEdipping fault within the Sct section (QB).3.3.2. Quimsa Cruz Granite[25] Limited deformation of the Quimsa Cruz granite was

recorded by rare, thin, discontinuous brittle shear zones thatin some cases match linear topographic features, rareslickensides, or subvertical joints. One prominent topo-graphic lineament tentatively interpreted as the trace of asteeply NE dipping fault parallels regional structures andextends across the pluton (QC, Figure 3), continuing intoPaleozoic rocks to the SE. Brittle shear indicators in thepluton exhibit steep �45–80� NW dips with N trendingstriae. Reconnaissance mapping of the SE segment of thelineament near the SE pluton margin (near Mina Caracoles)suggests abundant slickensides but little apparent offset ofthe intrusive contact.[26] Although there is a continuum of steeply NW to NE

dipping fractures in the pluton (rose diagram, Figure 3),many fractures strike �125�, similar to regional structuraltrends. Possible joint faces striking �045� and �075� areexpressed by uniform surfaces that form high cliffs and arebetter developed along the NE pluton margin and surround-ing Paleozoic wall rocks.3.3.3. SW Part: Paleozoic Rocks[27] West of the Quimsa Cruz pluton, Ordovician–Devo-

nian strata are deformed by SW directed thrusts that placeolder on successively younger rocks toward the SW. Thegranite cuts Ordovician Amutara (Oam) strata along the NElimb of a NW trending syncline (QD, Figure 3). The SWlimb contains a thrust placing Oam on Sun strata in a hangingwall flat on footwall flat geometry, requiring �3.4 km ofminimum slip. Reported unit thicknesses [Geobol, 1997]suggest structural thickening of the Oam section, and Oamand Sun panels are in turn thrust over the Sct section in a flaton flat relationship that requires �2 km of minimum slip. Inthe SW part of the transect, gently dipping Sun shales are


7 of 22

TC6007

inferred to structurally overlie E dipping Sct and DevonianVila Vila strata in an apparent hanging wall ramp on footwallflat relationship. The minimum estimated slip required toproduce this geometry is �2.7 km.3.4. Summary

[28] Mapping and cross section construction reveal acomplex array of Paleozoic strata and Mesozoic-Cenozoicgranites involved in fold-thrust structures. Shear senseindicators and slickenline data indicate principally dip slipmotion along NW striking, generally NE dipping faults(stereonets and rose diagram, Figures 2 and 3). Stratigraphiccutoff relationships are consistent with ramp and flat geom-etries. Therefore most faults are interpreted as thin-skinned,SW directed thrusts (Figure 4) developed during NE-SWshortening, consistent with previous studies of the centralAndean backthrust belt [Newell, 1949; Pareja et al., 1978;Martinez, 1980; Roeder, 1988; Sempere et al., 1990; Geobol,1993, 1995, 1997; McQuarrie and DeCelles, 2001].[29] Structural relationships reveal low magnitudes of

slip (<2–5 km) for most faults. Fault displacements arepoorly constrained, particularly for granites, which lackcutoffs but were emplaced at 10–15 km depth (3–5 kbar)[McBride et al., 1983; Heinrich, 1988]. Possible larger

magnitude structures potentially accommodated >5 km ofreverse slip, including from NE to SW: (1) the NE directedAmaguaya thrust; (2) the SW directed Yani-Illampu thrust;(3) thrusts bounding the SW margins of the Illampu andHuayna Potosı granites; and (4) thrusts near the Ordovician-Silurian contact along the SW edges of the northern andcentral transects. Despite the uncertainties for individualstructures, an estimation of total displacement suggests�20 km of minimum cumulative slip, or �35% NE-SWshortening. This minimum estimate of local strain is slightlylower than, but compatible with, the �50% net strainsuggested by recent estimates of regional shortening[McQuarrie, 2002; Arriagada et al., 2005].[30] Crosscutting relationships among thrusts and gran-

ites place timing constraints on deformation. The mid-Cenozoic Quimsa Cruz pluton truncates folds and thrustsalong its margins (QB and QD, Figure 3) and is not cut byfaults involving Permo-Triassic granites (Figure 2). Theonly postulated fault that cuts the Quimsa Cruz plutoncontinues into Paleozoic strata to the SE but produceslimited offset of the intrusive contact [Geobol, 1997]. Theseobservations indicate that most NE-SW shortening post-dated Permo-Triassic magmatism and predated mid-Ceno-zoic magmatism, supporting suggestions that the QuimsaCruz granite was emplaced after the bulk of upper crustalshortening in the Eastern Cordillera [Evernden et al., 1977;Lamb and Hoke, 1997].

4. U-Pb Geochronology

[31] New ion microprobe U-Pb analyses support previousK-Ar, 40Ar/39Ar, and limited conventional U-Pb measure-ments indicating emplacement of most intrusions in theCordillera Real during Permo-Triassic time [Evernden et al.,1977; McBride et al., 1983, 1987; Farrar et al., 1988;Heinrich, 1988]. These include the Illampu (Sorata), Yani,Huayna Potosı (Chucara), Zongo, and Taquesa (Mururata)granites [Evernden et al., 1977; Martinez, 1980; McBride etal., 1983], which are partially synchronous with Permiangranites along strike �250 km to the NW in southern Peru[Lancelot et al., 1978; Carlier et al., 1982]. Our results alsosupport Cenozoic emplacement ages for at least one granitein the region (Quimsa Cruz granite) [Evernden et al., 1977;McBride et al., 1983;Miller, 1988;Miller and Harris, 1989;Kennan et al., 1995]. For this granite, previous K-Ar and40Ar/39Ar biotite ages of 34.2–22.8 Ma [Evernden et al.,1977; McBride et al., 1983; Kennan et al., 1995] and anunpublished zircon fission track age of 38 Ma [Lamb et al.,1997] were used to infer a crystallization age betweenmiddle Eocene and early Miocene time.[32] Results of U-Pb ion microprobe analyses of 78

zircons from 7 granite samples (6–18 zircons per sample)are summarized in Figure 5 and Table 1. All uncertaintiesare reported as 1s standard errors. Complete methods andtabulated data are presented in Table S1 (available asauxiliary material1). A general issue that impacts U-Pbanalyses of the Permo-Triassic granitoids is that many

Figure 5. U-Pb concordia diagrams for analyzed zircongrains from Cordillera Real granites. Error ellipses areshown at 2s level. (a) Quimsa Cruz (Mina Argentina)granodiorite. (b) Quimsa Cruz (Mina Viloco) porphyriticmonzogranite. (c) Illampu granite. (d) Yani granite. (e)Huayna Potosı granite. (f) Zongo granite.

1Auxiliary material data sets are available at ftp://ftp.agu.org/apend/tc/2005tc001887. Other auxiliary material files are in the HTML.


8 of 22

TC6007

grains have high U contents (>1000 ppm) and low Th/Uvalues (<0.1), signaling high susceptibility to Pb loss and/ormetamorphic recrystallization. This possibility is supportedby the fact that U-Pb analyses obtained from the Permo-Triassic granitoids tend to spread out over an age range of�270–220 Ma (Table S1). For the conditions under whichthe analyses were undertaken, a homogeneous zircon pop-ulation would be expected to exhibit a much smaller spreadin U-Pb age (±2% or ±5 Ma 1s at 250 Ma). Because theobserved age variability is much higher, we regard thepossibility that Pb loss and/or metamorphic recrystallizationinduced the observed age spread as a real concern. Accord-ingly, for these samples we report the measured age rangeand refrain from making precise interpretations regardingcrystallization age.

4.1. Quimsa Cruz Intrusive Complex

[33] The Quimsa Cruz intrusion is composed of twounits. The main phase Mina Argentina (Mina Caracoles)body consists of granodiorite and monzogranite. A secondphase situated to the SW is the Mina Viloco porphyriticmonzogranite with K-feldspar megacrysts [Miller, 1988;Miller and Harris, 1989; Kennan et al., 1995]. Seventeenof 18 zircon 206Pb/238U ages from the Mina Argentinasample (QCG5) and 10 of 11 results from the Mina Vilocosample (QCG7) define distributions of late Oligocenecrystallization ages that are comparable in analytical scatter(±3.5% and ±2.2% 1s) to that expected from homogeneoussamples based upon the reproducibility of standard analysesduring the run (±2%). From these results we calculate

Table 1. Summary of U-Pb, 40Ar/39Ar, and Fission Track Resultsa

Sample Elevation, mU-Pb

Zircon, Ma

40Ar/39Ar Fission Track

Muscovite, Ma Biotite, Ma K-Feldspar, Ma Apatite, Ma Zircon, Ma

Northern (Amaguaya) TransectYani graniteRJG7 3042 42.9 ± 1.1 40.7 ± 0.6 43.7 ± 4.5 8.6 ± 0.7RJG8 3343 267–217 52.4 ± 1.3 44.6 ± 0.8 10.5 ± 0.9RJG9 3414 84.0 ± 2.1 39.4 ± 0.6 42.1 ± 3.1 10.0 ± 0.9RJG1 3805 273–218 55.0 ± 2.0 44.9 ± 0.7 34.6 ± 1.4 16.2 ± 1.303RJG15 3976 109.4 ± 4.9 132.5 ± 3.0 47.6 ± 3.1 15.4 ± 1.5RJG2 4074 99.4 ± 3.8 38.3 ± 0.7 10.3 ± 0.9RJG3 4335 47.5 ± 0.8 17.9 ± 1.8

Illampu granite03RJG16 4612 251–226 161.4 ± 3.9 55.2 ± 2.1 14.3 ± 1.2RJG14 4421 148.3 ± 4.2 43.9 ± 0.8RJG4 4714 191.8 ± 3.8 74.5 ± 2.1 10.4 ± 1.7RJG5 5020 149.2 ± 4.6 130.1 ± 4.7 11.2 ± 3.7RJG6 5363 192.9 ± 3.9 107.2 ± 3.8 18.2 ± 1.1

Central (Rio Zongo) TransectHuayna Potosı graniteRZG19 5400 217.6 ± 3.5 16.3 ± 1.0 151.0 ± 12.0RZG17 4360 241–218

Zongo graniteRZG11 2840 263–227

Southern (Quimsa Cruz) TransectQuimsa Cruz granite (Mina Argentina)QCG8 3559 23.3 ± 0.4QCG7 3900 25.65 ± 0.41 23.4 ± 0.4 6.8 ± 0.6QCG6 4438 23.9 ± 0.8 5.8 ± 0.5

Quimsa Cruz granite (Mina Viloco)QCG5 4830 26.02 ± 0.41 23.9 ± 0.4 15.5 ± 1.3QCG4 5108 24.6 ± 0.4 16.2 ± 2.4

Eastern Altiplano BasinAranjuez Formation tuffs03Taa01 25.48 ± 0.4003Taa02 26.69 ± 0.5403Taa03 25.08 ± 0.5403Taa04 27.40 ± 0.5403Taa05 25.23 ± 0.4203Taa06 33.13 ± 0.80

Salla Formation tuffs03Tsal4 28.00 ± 0.6803Tsal6 24.59 ± 0.39

aErrors reported at the 1s level. Most U-Pb values represent observed age range of noninherited zircon grains (see text); U-Pb ages for QCG7 and QCG5are based on the weighted mean of noninherited zircon grains. The 40Ar/39Ar ages are weighted mean ages. Fission track ages are pooled ages. See theauxiliary material for complete analytical results.


9 of 22

TC6007

weighted mean ages of 26.2 ± 0.2 Ma (QCG5; Figure 5e)and 25.4 ± 0.2 Ma (QCG7; Figure 5f), respectively. Ourresults conflict with less precise data that suggested Eocenecooling for this pluton [Kennan et al., 1995; Lamb et al.,1997]. Moreover, we did not confirm a proposed olderPermo-Triassic heritage [Miller, 1988; Miller and Harris,1989; Lamb and Hoke, 1997]. The Mina Argentina sampleyielded a discordant late Paleozoic grain while the MinaViloco sample produced one discordant zircon with a207Pb/206Pb age of 2656 ± 6 Ma. This Late Archean agematches older provinces of the Amazon craton to the east[e.g., Santos et al., 2000] and could conceivably implyinheritance from cratonic rocks underthrust beneath thecentral Andean plateau [e.g., Beck and Zandt, 2002].

4.2. Illampu Granite

[34] Eight of 10 zircons analyzed from the Illampugranite (03RJG16) yield Late Permian to Late Triassic206Pb/238U ages (251–226 Ma). Uranium concentrationsare in excess of 1000 ppm with the highest U grain(3500 ppm) yielding a Th/U value of 0.004 that is typicalof metamorphic recrystallization. We consider it possiblethat the Illampu granite was emplaced as early as �250 Maand that the younger ages reflect Pb loss and metamorphicrecrystallization. Two Silurian U-Pb ages (�430 Ma) werealso measured (Figure 5a) from low U grains (<500 ppm)with Th/U values typical of magmatic conditions (>0.1).These U-Pb results are similar in age to reset metamorphiccrystalline basement in the Western Cordillera [Worner etal., 2000] and probably represent assimilated wall rock.

4.3. Yani Granite

[35] Results from the Yani granite (RJG1) are similar tothose from the Illampu body in that 10 of 18 zircons definea range of 206Pb/238U ages between 273 and 218 Ma(Figure 5b). Similar to the Illampu Granite, some grainswith high U and low Th/U content are present. However,relatively low U grains (<500 ppm) with magmatic Th/U(>0.1) values also occur in the youngest portion of the agedistribution, at 230–218 Ma. Hence the implications of theresults for determining the emplacement age of the Yanigranite are ambiguous and more detailed work is required.Nevertheless, it seems clear that the granite was likelyintruded during Permo-Triassic time. The remaining8 zircons yield variably discordant U-Pb ages that appearto reflect assimilation of basement of early Paleozoic andLate Proterozoic age, similar to the Altiplano and WesternCordillera [Lehmann, 1978; Worner et al., 2000].

4.4. Huayna Potosı Granite

[36] Ten of 12 zircon 206Pb/238U ages measured from theHuayna Potosı granite (RZG17) define a range from 241 to218 Ma (Figure 5c). Similar to the previous sample, somehigh U, low-Th/U analyses were obtained along with lowerU analyses characterized by magmatic Th/U values. Moredetailed work is required to more rigorously assess theemplacement age of the Huayna Potosı granite. The two

older analyses are slightly discordant and appear to repre-sent assimilated early Paleozoic basement.

4.5. Zongo Granite

[37] Eleven of 15 zircons measured from sample RZG11from theKuticucho phase of the Zongo granite [McBride et al.,1987] define a range of 206Pb/238U ages from 263 to 227 Ma(Figure 5d). The combination of high U concentrations(typically � 1000 ppm) and low Th/U values (generally<0.03) indicate a high probability that Pb loss and/ormetamorphic recrystallization significantly affect the results.The remaining 4 analyses are variably discordant and appearto represent assimilated early Paleozoic and Late Proterozoicbasement rocks.

5. The 40Ar/39Ar Thermochronology

[38] The 40Ar/39Ar step-heating analyses were carried outon 18 granite and 8 tuff samples (Table 1). A more detailedaccounting of the methods employed and results obtained isprovided in Table S2 (see auxiliary material). Uncertaintiesare reported at the 1s level and include analytical errors anduncertainties in J factors.[39] The new 40Ar/39Ar data help constrain cooling

histories for the Cordillera Real granitoids and eruptionages for volcanic tuffs within the Cenozoic succession ofthe eastern Altiplano. Previous investigations of granites inthe Cordillera Real and along strike in southern Peruidentified complex thermal histories believed to haveresulted from Eocene thrust-induced heating and subsequentcooling [Evernden et al., 1977; McBride et al., 1983, 1987;Farrar et al., 1988; Heinrich, 1988; Kontak et al., 1990;Sandeman et al., 1995]. This interpreted tectonothermalepisode of transient heating was considered to have pro-duced anomalous relationships (i.e., biotites yielding olderages than corresponding muscovites [McBride et al., 1987;Farrar et al., 1988; Kontak et al., 1990]). New 40Ar/39Arresults reveal a more straightforward pattern of mica and K-feldspar 40Ar/39Ar ages that can be interpreted as theproduct of exhumation-related cooling. Finally, while pre-vious studies have dated volcanic horizons in the easternAltiplano basin [e.g., MacFadden et al., 1985; Kay et al.,1998], the age of the oldest synorogenic fill remainedpoorly constrained. New 40Ar/39Ar biotite ages presentedhere indicate that the sediments were deposited severalmillion years earlier than previously indicated.

5.1. Northern Transect

[40] The 12 granite samples along the northern transectyield 40Ar/39Ar total gas ages that become progressivelyyounger with decreasing elevation. This overall relationshipis similar to that determined in previous studies [e.g.,Farrar et al., 1988; Kontak et al., 1990]. From SW to NE(5363 to 3042 m), muscovite ages decrease from 193 ± 4 to43 ± 1 Ma. Similarly, biotite ages decrease from 133 ± 3 to39 ± 1 Ma (Figure 6 and Table 1). Unfortunately, featuresexhibited by the age spectra indicate variable contaminationwith excess 40Ar (40ArE) [Roddick et al., 1980; Dallmeyer


10 of 22

TC6007

and Rivers, 1983; Zeitler and Fitz Gerald, 1986; Foster etal., 1990; Baxter et al., 2002] (Figure 7). Results ofisothermal duplicate and quadruplicate experiments in theinitial heating steps for K-feldspar confirm retention ofexcess argon in the lower gas release portions for K-feldspars examined in this study. These materials yieldsaddle-shaped age spectra that indicate 40ArE contaminationaffects both low- and high-temperature gas release (Figure 8)[e.g., Harrison et al., 1994].[41] In general, biotite 40Ar/39Ar age spectra exhibited

less evidence of 40ArE contamination at the lower elevationlocalities in the NE (i.e., below 4400 m elevation). Thesebiotites yielded younger ages and flatter age spectra(Figure 7a) than biotites collected from above 4400 m inthe SW (Figure 7b). Muscovite results exhibited similarpatterns. For example, the youngest NE muscovite (RJG7)yields a flat age spectrum with little evidence of distur-

bance. In contrast, high-elevation muscovites from the SWyield saddle-shaped spectra (Figure 7c).[42] Although 40ArE contamination clearly limits our

ability to carry out detailed interpretation of the 40Ar/39Ardata, several considerations suggest that the overall extentof contamination was not sufficient to preclude meaningfulinterpretation of the overall nature of the results. Forexample, none of the micas are so contaminated with40ArE that 40Ar/39Ar ages exceed corresponding U-Pbcrystallization ages. Also, coexisting muscovite and biotitegenerally yield similar ages. In 10 of 11 cases, the musco-vites were older than coexisting biotite, as expected fromtheir high intrinsic Ar retentivity. This relationship contrastswith that reported for the Zongo-San Gaban region extend-ing from the Cordillera Real �450 km to the NW intosouthern Peru where biotites are apparently so contaminatedwith 40ArE that their K-Ar ages commonly exceed those ofcoexisting muscovite [McBride et al., 1987; Farrar et al.,1988; Kontak et al., 1990]. Finally, the lowest elevationsample along the transect yields highly correlated inverseisochrons for muscovite and biotite consistent with nearlyatmospheric trapped argon (Table S2; see auxiliary material).Hence we believe that at least the topographically lowestsamples yield geologically meaningful ages that constitute arobust record of Cenozoic cooling within the study region.For biotite, the younger ages (8 of 12 samples) fall between38.3 ± 0.7 and 55.2 ± 2.1 Ma. The younger muscovite ages(3 of 11 samples) range from 42.9 ± 1.1 to 55.0 ± 2.0 Ma.As detailed below, the Eocene mica bulk closure ages canbe explained by acceleration of denudation rates in themiddle Eocene with continued high rates persisting into theOligocene.[43] To further quantify Cenozoic cooling for the north-

ern transect, we also measured K-feldspar 40Ar/39Ar agespectra and interpreted the results using the multidiffusiondomain (MDD) model [Lovera et al., 1989, 1997, 2002;Lee, 1995; see also Parsons et al., 1999]. Because the K-feldspar age spectra are seriously affected by 40ArE, welimited our modeling efforts to the least affected portion of

Figure 6. Age-distance plot showing 40Ar/39Ar musco-vite, biotite, and K-feldspar results and apatite fission track(AFT) data for 12 samples along the northern transect. Atthis scale, the individual 1s age errors are contained withinthe various geometric symbols.

Figure 7. The 40Ar/39Ar age spectra for biotite and muscovite grains from granite samples of thenorthern and southern transects. Note variable scale on vertical (age) axes. (a) Northern transect biotite(<4400 m). (b) Northern transect biotite (>4400 m). (c) Northern transect muscovite. (d) Southerntransect biotite.


11 of 22

TC6007

the age spectra (i.e., intermediate release steps [see Zeitlerand Fitz Gerald, 1986; Lovera et al., 2002]). MDD mod-eling of four K-feldspars from the Yani granite at lowerelevations of the northern transect (Figure 8) constrain themid-Cenozoic thermal histories and help link the highertemperature 40Ar/39Ar mica results to the apatite fissiontrack results discussed below. The MDD model results(Figure 8) demonstrate 8–12�C/Ma cooling between about38 and 26 Ma with average cooling rates generally increas-ing with decreasing elevation from SW to NE.

5.2. Southern Transect

[44] Biotite 40Ar/39Ar analyses from five Quimsa Cruzsamples along a vertical interval of �1550 m (Figures 3and 7d) yield late Oligocene–earliest Miocene coolingages ranging from 24.6 ± 0.4 to 23.3 ± 0.4 Ma (Table 1).The samples produce relatively flat age spectra (Figure 7d)and become youngerwith decreasing elevation to theNE. Thefact that the biotite 40Ar/39Ar results are slightly younger thanthe �26 Ma U-Pb zircon crystallization age measured fromthe Quimsa Cruz granite is consistent with a depth ofemplacement of >4 km [see also Miller, 1988; Lamb andHoke, 1997].

5.3. Depositional Age Constraints for the AltiplanoBasin

[45] Biotite 40Ar/39Ar results are reported for 8 volcanictuffs in the Cenozoic succession of the eastern Altiplano(Figure 9 and Table 1). A discontinuous belt of exposed

basin fill occurs between 16 and 17.5�S, including the Penasand Aranjuez formations in the north and the Luribay andSalla formations in the south (Figure 1b) [Martinez, 1980;Geobol, 1993, 1995; Suarez and Diaz, 1996].[46] The deposits are 500–1500 m thick, but only the

upper levels of the southern exposures have been studied indetail, where previous fission track, 40Ar/39Ar, and magne-tostratigraphic studies have revealed Oligocene depositionof the Salla Formation from 29.4 to 25.5 Ma [MacFadden etal., 1985; McRae, 1990; Kay et al., 1998]. New results fortuffs in the lower to intermediate levels include six tuffs ofthe Aranjuez Formation ranging from 33.1 ± 0.8 to 25.2 ±0.4 Ma (Table 1). Two additional tuffs from the SallaFormation yield ages of 28.0 ± 0.7 and 24.6 ± 0.4 Ma.These results demonstrate that sediment accumulation hadalready commenced in the eastern Altiplano by the Eocene-Oligocene boundary, earlier than commonly envisioned[e.g., Sempere et al., 1990].

6. Fission Track Thermochronology

[47] Fission track analysis was employed to furtherevaluate the low-temperature (<120�C) cooling history ofthe Cordillera Real. Apatite fission track (AFT) data helpconstrain the time at which rocks were exhumed above�4 km depth (110–120�C), assuming a steady geothermalgradient. Moreover, their track length distributions can bemodeled to constrain low-temperature (�60–120�C) ther-mal histories [Laslett et al., 1987; Lutz and Omar, 1991;Willett, 1997; Ketcham et al., 2000]. The new results buildupon those of previous studies, notably Benjamin et al.[1987], who presented AFT and zircon fission track (ZFT)results along the central (Rio Zongo) transect. Additionalfission track data have also been presented within thecontext of several other studies [Crough, 1983; Heinrich,1988; Safran, 1998]. The previous results have given rise toconflicting interpretations regarding the onset and rates ofcooling in the region [Benjamin, 1986; Benjamin et al.,1987; Masek et al., 1994; Lamb and Hoke, 1997; Safran,1998; Moore and England, 2001; Anders et al., 2002].[48] Seventeen fission track analyses were performed on

16 granite samples, including 11 AFT results for thenorthern transect, 4 AFT results for the southern transect,

Figure 8. (left) The 40Ar/39Ar age spectra and (right)multidomain diffusion (MDD) modeling results for K-feldspar grains from Yani granite samples of the northerntransect. (a) Sample 03RJG15. (b) Sample RJG1.(c) Sample RJG9. (d) Sample RJG7.

Figure 9. The 40Ar/39Ar age spectra for biotite grains fromvolcanic tuffs of the eastern Altiplano basin. (a) Results forsix tuff samples from the Aranjuez Formation. (b) Resultsfor two tuff samples from the Salla Formation.


12 of 22

TC6007

and AFT and ZFT results for a single sample from thecentral transect. AFT ages range from 18.2 to 5.8 Ma, withsignificant age overlap among the transects (Figure 6 andTable 1). Ages are reported as pooled values with 1s errors.Complete results are reported in Table S3 (see auxiliarymaterial).[49] Modeling of the new AFT data yields results con-

sistent with those obtained from higher-temperature40Ar/39Ar thermal history data (i.e., acceleration of denuda-tion rates in the middle Eocene with continued high ratespersisting into the Oligocene). Similar to 40Ar/39Ar data, thefission track results show progressively younger ages fromSW to NE, from high to low elevation (Figure 6). For thenorthern transect, the oldest and youngest AFT ages of 18.2and 8.6 Ma are from the highest and lowest (5363 and3042 m) samples, respectively. AFT ages for the southerntransect generally correlate with elevation, from 16.2 to5.8 Ma between 5108 and 3900 m. The ZFT age of 151 Mafor the central transect provides a critical data point for theHuayna Potosı granite at 5400 m, clarifying previousinterpretations of Benjamin et al. [1987]. A correlationbetween AFT age and elevation throughout the CordilleraReal suggests a simple record of exhumation-induced cool-ing. However, a few samples depart slightly from this trend,suggestive of locally more complex histories possiblyrelated to a variable thermal structure at shallow depth, asdictated by topographic relief.

6.1. Northern Transect

[50] AFT analyses were performed on 11 of 12 samplesfrom the northern transect. The AFT results (Table 1) showMiocene cooling, with ages ranging from 18.2 ± 1.1 Ma forthe highest SW sample to 8.6 ± 0.7 Ma for the lowest NEsample (Figure 6). Mean track lengths vary from 11.83 ±0.28 to 14.06 ± 0.20 mm, with standard deviations ofgenerally 1.5–2.7 mm. AFT ages are generally older athigher elevation although a few exceptions to this trend areinterspersed along the transect (Table 1). The youngersamples generally have longer mean track lengths andoverall more restricted length distributions (Table 1) indi-cating more rapid cooling [Green, 1986; Fitzgerald, 1994].

6.2. Southern Transect

[51] AFT analyses of the four Quimsa Cruz samples yieldages ranging from 16.2 ± 2.4 to 5.8 ± 0.5 Ma (Table 1). Theyounger samples are located at lower elevations in the NEwhile the older ages are generally from the highest part ofthe transect in the SW. Relative to the northern transect, themean track lengths tend to be slightly longer, ranging from13.19 ± 0.24 to 13.75 ± 0.26 mm (Table 1). However,average track length distributions are comparable to slightlybroader, with standard deviations of 2.19–2.66 mm, sug-gesting potentially more complex thermal histories [e.g.,Fitzgerald and Gleadow, 1988]. When considered togetherwith the 40Ar/39Ar biotite results, the fission track dataclearly support late Oligocene through late Miocene slowexhumation of the Quimsa Cruz granite. Although the dataset is limited, the younger AFT ages are consistent with aphase of accelerated denudation beginning at �6 Ma.

6.3. Modeling of AFT Results

[52] Permissible AFT cooling histories were constrainedby the measured track length distributions and kineticparameters derived from etched track pit diameters (Dpar

values) [Carleson et al., 1999; Donelick et al., 1999;Ketcham et al., 1999, 2000]. Measured track lengths havebeen corrected using a C axis projection [Donelick et al.,1999] and each sample was modeled assuming a singlekinetic population, consistent with the observed narrowrange in Dpar values (1.51–1.64 mm). Confidence limitsof the cooling paths were produced using a Monte Carlosearch algorithm, yielding an ‘‘acceptable fit’’ envelope(statistical probability value = 0.05), and a ‘‘good fit’’envelope (statistical probability value = 0.5) [Ketcham etal., 2000].[53] AFTmodeling for the northern transect reveals nearly

linear, <120�C time-temperature paths indicative of uniformrapid cooling from late Miocene onward (Figure 10a).In contrast, older samples display variable cooling histories.Several older samples (notably 03RJG16 and RJG3) sug-gest slower cooling during the early to middle Miocenefollowed by rapid late Miocene cooling (Figure 10b). Theremaining older samples (RJG6, 03RJG15, and RJG1)exhibit approximately linear trends suggesting uniformcooling from late Oligocene–early Miocene to Pliocenetime.[54] Approximate cooling rates were estimated for mod-

eled ‘‘good fit’’ cooling envelopes between 110 and 60�C.The younger, 8.6–11.9 Ma samples (Figure 10a) yieldcooling of 7–12�C/Myr between �10 and �6 Ma. Theolder samples (Figure 10b) exhibit cooling of generally<5�C/Myr between �23 and �8 Ma. For the southerntransect, AFT thermal models indicate cooling of <5–11�C/Myr from �19 to �9 Ma, with more rapid lateMiocene cooling of <5–20�C/Myr. Overall, the AFT agesand model results (Figure 10) indicate rapid cooling <120�Cduring late Miocene to Pliocene time, with some samplessuggesting earlier slower cooling during early to middleMiocene time. Moreover, the results are quite consistentwith the K-feldspar 40Ar/39Ar results in that they indicatecontinued rapid cooling during Eocene-Oligocene time.

7. Cenozoic Exhumation of the Cordillera Real

7.1. Integrated Thermal Histories

[55] Thermochronologic results help constrain the cool-ing history of the Cordillera Real. Composite thermalhistories were constructed using 40Ar/39Ar results andrelevant closure temperatures for muscovite (400–345�C)and biotite (325–280�C) [McDougall and Harrison, 1999],MDD modeling of K-feldspar 40Ar/39Ar results (250–150�C) [Lovera et al., 1989], and modeling of apatitefission track length distributions (120–60�C) [Ketcham etal., 2000].[56] Four samples from the northern transect (03RJG15,

RJG1, RJG9, and RJG7) were targeted on the basis of (1)lower excess argon retention, suggesting more reliable,longer duration MDD histories, (2) lower uncertainties for


13 of 22

TC6007

AFT modeling results, and (3) the internal consistencyafforded by samples from the same rock unit, the Yanigranite. The MDD and AFT cooling histories are plotted intime-temperature space, along with the 40Ar/39Ar mica ages(Figure 11). High-temperature portions of the AFT modelswere constrained by requiring the composite thermal histo-ries to fit the lowest, well-defined temperature envelope ofthe MDD models.[57] Higher elevation samples in the SW (03RJG15 and

RJG1) exhibit protracted histories that extend back toCretaceous–early Cenozoic time. Their cooling paths showpronounced slope breaks in time-temperature space indica-tive of an onset of rapid cooling during the middle to lateEocene (40–35 Ma; Figures 11a–11b). The highest sampleshows uniform cooling since �37 Ma at 6�C/Myr while theother suggests a slight reduction in cooling rate at �26 Ma,from 10 to 5�C/Myr.

[58] The topographically lower NE samples (RJG9 andRJG7) record more abbreviated histories that commenced at45–40 Ma. Steeper segments of the cooling paths indicatetwo phases of rapid cooling: an initial middle Eocene–Oligocene phase that was underway by �40 Ma andpersisted until �26 Ma and a second phase from lateMiocene onward (Figures 11c–11d). The cooling pathsreveal initial rapid cooling between about 43 and 26 Maat 11�C/Myr and later rapid cooling at 9–16�C/Myr from�11 Ma onward. A period of nearly isothermal conditionsappears to separate the two phases of rapid cooling. Thisepisode of diminished cooling is further supported byAFT model results for additional samples, notably RJG3(Figure 10b), which indicates <1.0–2.0�C/Myr coolingfrom 22 to 8 Ma.[59] In summary, the integrated cooling histories uni-

formly identify a middle Eocene inception of rapid cooling.

Figure 10. Apatite fission track (AFT) (left) thermal modeling results and (right) track length data for(a) younger samples and (b) older samples. Each AFT model shows the calculated time-temperature path,pooled age, and modeled age (in parentheses). Each track length plot shows the track length distribution(histogram), modeled distribution (curve), observed mean track length, and modeled mean track length(in parentheses). All reported track lengths represent corrected values using a C axis projection [Donelicket al., 1999].


14 of 22

TC6007

This phase of rapid cooling (11�C/Myr) persisted from45–40 to �26 Ma. Lower-elevation samples further con-strain a period of reduced cooling from �26 to �11 Ma(0–2�C/Myr) followed by rapid cooling (9–16�C/Myr)from �11 Ma onward.

7.2. Age-Elevation Relationships

[60] Examination of the variation of mica 40Ar/39Ar agesas a function of elevation further constrains the highertemperature cooling history of the Cordillera Real. Providedan increase in cooling rate, samples will define a broad agerange at high elevation that narrows with decreasing eleva-tion. These age patterns are produced by the intersection ofpresent-day topography and paleodepth as manifested bythe exhumed partial retention zone for Ar in the micas.When not obscured by 40ArE contamination, the onset ofrapid cooling will be marked as an abrupt inflection in a plotof age vs. elevation that defines the lower limit of the partialretention zone (Figure 12a) [Fitzgerald et al., 1995].[61] This predicted relationship is observed within the

Cordillera Real in spite of complications related to 40ArEcontamination at high elevation. The 40Ar/39Ar age differ-ences for 11 muscovite-biotite pairs along the northern

transect become systematically smaller (from �86 to�2 Myr) from high to low elevations. This relationshipsuggests the low-elevation micas were sufficiently deep thatthey were completely open with respect to Ar retention andclosed only as a result of initial rapid cooling during themiddle Eocene (Figure 6). We interpret the transition fromdistributed biotite ages (130.1–55.2 Ma) to clustered ages(47.5–38.3 Ma) below �4500 m elevation as indicating theonset of rapid cooling at 45–40 Ma (Figure 12b). Assuminga steady 30�C/km geothermal gradient [Benjamin et al.,1987; Henry and Pollack, 1988], the biotite results indicatethat the average cooling rate increased at 45–40 Ma from<5 to 10�C/Myr. 40Ar/39Ar weighted mean ages for biotite,muscovite, and K-feldspar from the lowest sample (RJG7)are nearly identical at 44–40 Ma (Figure 6 and Table 1),further supporting rapid cooling at this time.[62] On an age-elevation plot, the broad distribution of

muscovite cooling ages (Figure 12b) reflects relatively slowcooling at <5�C/Myr prior to middle Eocene time. Aninflection in the trend of the data suggests that samplesabove �3300 m resided in the muscovite partial retentionzone prior to �45 Ma. A similar inflection in the biotite datasuggests that an exhumed partial retention zone for biotite isrepresented by samples above �4400 m (Figure 12b). Thesedata require that the samples resided in a narrow zone at 9–11.5 km depth prior to �45 Ma, given the assumptions ofclosure temperature and geothermal gradient (Figure 11a).This estimate is in agreement with the reported �10–15 kmgranite emplacement depth (3–5 kbar) [McBride et al.,1983; Heinrich, 1988].[63] A middle Eocene inception of rapid cooling is

consistent with ZFT data for the central transect [Benjaminet al., 1987] (Figure 12c). Benjamin et al. [1987] speculatedthat their oldest (176.9–62.8 Ma), highest elevation (5100–3900 m) samples cooled within the ZFT partial annealingzone prior to more rapid cooling at �45 Ma. A new ZFTanalysis of a sample from 5400 m elevation (Table 1),�300 m above their highest sample, supports this interpre-tation. The data define a trend from widely distributed ZFTages (roughly 177–63 Ma) at higher elevations to a narrowdistribution of ages (mostly 45–32 Ma) below �3900 m(Figure 12c). In addition, the younger ZFT ages of 36.0–31.9 Ma [Benjamin et al., 1987] are similar to the youngestK-feldspar 40Ar/39Ar age of 34.6 ± 1.4 Ma for the northerntransect (Table 1). These comparable ages, despite thedisparity in closure temperatures, suggest that rapid coolingcontinued during late Eocene to Oligocene time. Moreover,the ZFT and 40Ar/39Ar mica data support the MDD andcomposite modeling results (Figures 8 and 11) indicatinginitial rapid cooling at 45–40 Ma.[64] On an age-elevation plot, AFT data for the northern

transect define a steep, nearly linear trend suggestinguniform rapid cooling was underway by about 10 Ma(Figure 12b). The absence of more broadly distributed dataat higher elevations suggests that the partial annealing zonehas been removed by erosion. Modest AFT age variationsreveal that some anomalous older samples locally contradictthe trend of increasing age at higher elevations (Figure 12b),as evidenced in a NE-SW profile (Figure 6). Several

Figure 11. Composite thermal modeling results (com-bined 40Ar/39Ar MDD modeling and AFT thermal model-ing) for four granite samples from the northern transect.(a) Sample 03RJG15. (b) Sample RJG1. (c) Sample RJG9.(d) Sample RJG7.


15 of 22

TC6007

mechanisms may explain older samples interspersed withyounger samples. First, postcooling displacement alongfaults could account for the age contradictions. However,the older ages generally occur in hanging wall settings,inconsistent with regional thrust faulting [Pareja et al.,1978; Martinez, 1980; McQuarrie, 2002]. Second, becausethe 110–120�C isotherm is sensitive to topography at smallwavelengths [e.g., Stuwe et al., 1994], particularly in thehigh-relief regions such as the Cordillera Real [Safran,1998], topographic effects on the former geothermal gradi-ent may produce the necessary age variations. Third, the agediscrepancies may be explained by compositional differ-ences in apatite, as reflected by Dpar (etch pit diameter)values, which affect the closure temperature of individualsamples [Carleson et al., 1999]. Despite the narrow range ofDpar values (1.51–1.64 mm), there is a positive relationshipbetween higher Dpar values (>1.60 mm) and older ages(Figure 10). We tentatively attribute the anomalous olderAFT ages to the combined effects of topography andcompositional variations.[65] For the southern transect, the cooling history is

constrained by limited 40Ar/39Ar biotite and AFT results.On an age-elevation plot, the biotite ages reveal a steep,nearly linear trend at about 25–23 Ma (Figure 12d).Because U-Pb zircon ages reveal a �26 Ma crystallizationage for the Quimsa Cruz granite, the biotite suggest thatmodest rates of erosional denudation from >4 km depthaccompanied pluton emplacement. AFT age data from fourQuimsa Cruz samples define a stair step curve with aninflection suggestive of an increase in cooling rate at �6 Ma(Figure 12d).

7.3. Eastern Altiplano Sedimentation

[66] The thermal record of exhumation is compatible withthe sedimentation record of the eastern Altiplano. 40Ar/39Arages of 8 tuffs (Figure 9 and Table 1) within the Cenozoicsuccession help define the age of basin fill at 16–17.5�S,including the Penas, Aranjuez, Luribay, and Salla forma-tions (Figure 1b) [Martinez, 1980; MacFadden et al., 1985;McRae, 1990; Sempere et al., 1990; Geobol, 1993, 1995;Suarez and Diaz, 1996; Lamb and Hoke, 1997; Kay et al.,1998; McQuarrie and DeCelles, 2001]. The age data revealdeposition spanning the Oligocene, from 33.1 to 24.6 Ma.[67] Provenance data (Figure 13) for these deposits reveal

the composition of source areas and the sediment transportpathways. Sandstone petrographic analyses consisted ofpoint counts (450 grains per thin section) of 11 samples

Figure 12. (a) Schematic age-elevation plot of idealizeddistribution of ages associated with an exhumed partialretention/annealing zone (PRZ/PAZ) [after Fitzgerald et al.,1995]. Thermochronometer sample age-elevation plots of40Ar/39Ar muscovite, biotite, and K-feldspar weighted meanages, apatite fission track (AFT) pooled ages, and zirconfission track (ZFT) pooled ages for the (b) northern transect,(c) central transect, and (d) southern transect. The shadedlines represent the approximate age-elevation trends for thevarious thermochronometers.


16 of 22

TC6007

from a �200 m stratigraphic interval in the Luribay For-mation to middle Salla Formation. A modified Gazzi-Dickinson method of point counting was employed[Ingersoll et al., 1984] and complete results are presentedin Table S4 (see auxiliary material). Recalculated detritalmodes are plotted in ternary diagrams depicting proportionsof Q-F-L (quartz-feldspar-lithic fragments; Figure 13a) andLv-Lm-Ls (lithic volcanic-metamorphic-sedimentary frag-ments; Figure 13b). Both diagrams show upsection varia-tions in detrital composition. The Q-F-L plot displays aminor decrease followed by a dramatic increase in lithic frag-ments (Figure 13a). The Lv-Lm-Ls plot depicts an upsectionshift from sedimentary to metamorphic fragments followedby a huge increase in the proportion of volcanic fragments(Figure 13b). Quartz, sedimentary, and metamorphic frag-ments are consistent with derivation from Paleozoic clasticsedimentary and metasedimentary rocks of the EasternCordillera. The Luribay-Salla sandstones generally containa greater proportion of lithic fragments, particularly volcanicfragments, relative to previous Altiplano studies [Hortonet al., 2002], possibly related to closer proximity to sedi-ment sources. In any case, the increased proportion ofvolcanic detritus is considered a record of increasing vol-canism in the Cordillera Real, likely associated with em-placement of the Quimsa Cruz granite.[68] Over 330 paleocurrent indicators were measured,

including trough axes and trough limbs. Paleocurrent datafor the Aranjuez and Luribay-Salla localities indicate trans-

port to the SSWand NW, respectively (Figures 13c and 13d).Similar to the compositional data, these dispersal patterns arecompatible with derivation from the neighboring CordilleraReal.[69] Structural relationships shed further light on Ceno-

zoic basin evolution. Discontinuous exposures of the Penas,Aranjuez, and Luribay-Salla formations aligned parallel tothe Cordillera Real (Figure 1b) share similar ages, prove-nance, facies, and unconformable basal contacts on steeplydipping Silurian-Devonian strata. Growth strata within theLuribay Formation and lower levels of the 29.4–25.5 MaSalla Formation indicate syndepositional activity along SWdirected fold-thrust structures prior to �28 Ma [Gillis etal., 2004]. Growth geometries are not observed in thesubhorizontal strata of the upper succession, indicating lateOligocene cessation of upper crustal deformation in theregion.[70] The compositional and paleocurrent analyses dem-

onstrate that the Cordillera Real was an active sedimentsource during early evolution of the eastern Altiplano basin.40Ar/39Ar age data and structural relationships indicate thatdeposition was occurring from about 33 to 25 Ma, largelycoeval with SW directed thrusting, in agreement with rapidOligocene exhumation identified by thermochronologicdata. These relationships indicate that crustal shortening,unroofing and rapid cooling were synchronous along theeastern margin of the central Andean plateau, suggestingthat crustal shortening was a principal cause of exhumationin the early orogenic history.

8. Discussion

[71] Thermochronologic data help determine the historyof exhumation-related cooling in the Cordillera Real, but asignificant challenge lies in interpretation of the deforma-tion history associated with this thermal record. In consid-ering alternative tectonics models for the eastern flank of thecentral Andean plateau, several observations must beaddressed.

8.1. Kinematics

[72] Structural data and crosscutting relationships restrictthe magnitude and timing of shortening on upper crustalstructures. Most notable is the limited displacement (<2–5 km) accommodated by most thrusts, suggesting 20 km ofminimum NE-SW shortening (�35% net strain) across theCordillera Real (Figure 4). No evidence exists for near-surface large-magnitude thrusts. Nevertheless, the rangeexposes some of the deepest structural levels in Bolivia,implying a larger structure at depth near the EasternCordillera–Altiplano boundary [e.g., Dorbath et al., 1993;McQuarrie, 2002].[73] In terms of kinematics, upper crustal deformation

postdated Permo-Triassic magmatism and early Paleocenedeposition of the El Molino Formation (Figure 1b) [Lamband Hoke, 1997; DeCelles and Horton, 2003; Horton,2005]. Tighter age constraints are provided by growth strataindicating SW directed thrusting synchronous with Oligo-cene, and possibly late Eocene, sedimentation [Gillis et al.,

Figure 13. Provenance data for basin fill of the easternAltiplano basin. (a) Quartz-feldspar-lithic fragments (Q-F-L) and (b) lithic volcanic-metamorphic-sedimentary frag-ments (Lv-Lm-Ls) ternary diagrams showing data andupsection trends (dashed arrows) for the Luribay-Sallasuccession. Paleocurrent rose diagrams and vector meansfor the (c) Aranjuez Formation and (d) Luribay-Sallasuccession.


17 of 22

TC6007

2004]. 40Ar/39Ar tuff ages (Figure 9 and Table 1) andsediment provenance information (Figure 13) suggest thatdeformation and surface uplift were in progress along theeastern flank of the central Andean plateau between 33 and25 Ma. For younger age constraints, crosscutting relation-ships and U-Pb ages (Figures 3 and 5 and Table 1) showthat fold-thrust deformation predated �26 Ma emplacementof the Quimsa Cruz granite [Evernden et al., 1977; Lamband Hoke, 1997]. Although it is widely accepted that uppercrustal shortening in the Eastern Cordillera had ceased by�10 Ma, on the basis of the extensive San Juan del Orosurface [Gubbels et al., 1993; Kennan et al., 1997], inter-montane basins throughout the Eastern Cordillera suggestthat major upper crustal shortening was complete by latestOligocene to earliest Miocene time [Horton, 2005]. Withthe emergence of improved timing constraints for theCordillera Real and broader Eastern Cordillera of Bolivia,it is clear that Paleogene deformation is integral to theevolution of the central Andean plateau [e.g., Horton et al.,2001;DeCelles andHorton, 2003;Horton, 2005;McQuarrieet al., 2005a], in contrast to many studies that considershortening to be younger than �25 Ma [Isacks, 1988;Gubbels et al., 1993; Allmendinger et al., 1997; Kley andMonaldi, 1998;Gregory-Wodzicki, 2000]. The observed maprelationships suggest limited upper crustal deformation after�25 Ma, but do not rule out the possibility of Neogenepassive transport of upper crustal material above deeperstructures.

8.2. Cooling History

[74] In addition to structural constraints, a viable modelmust also explain thermochronologic results. 40Ar/39Armica ages and multidomain diffusion (MDD) modeling ofK-feldspar results demonstrate a middle Eocene initiation of

rapid cooling at 45–40 Ma, consistent with the previouszircon fission track (ZFT) results of Benjamin et al. [1987],as supplemented by a single new ZFT analysis (Figure 12c).Thermal modeling of 40Ar/39Ar and AFT results suggestthat initial rapid cooling continued through the Oligocene to�26 Ma, followed by a period of slower cooling, thenrenewed rapid cooling commencing at �11 Ma (Figure 11).The 40Ar/39Ar data display a pronounced and systematicdecrease in muscovite and biotite ages from SW to NE(Figure 6), consistent with a northeastward progression ofexhumation. 40Ar/39Ar data suggest that all but the lowest-elevation sample cooled within the muscovite partial reten-tion zone, and the 4 highest samples cooled within thebiotite partial retention zone, requiring residence at �280–345�C prior to �45 Ma (Figure 12b). Given the assump-tions of closure temperature and steady geothermal gradient,an estimated 9–11.5 km of total exhumation has occurredsince 45–40 Ma, with �3.5 km of that since �11 Ma.These values are consistent with inferred �10–15 kmgranite emplacement depths [McBride et al., 1983; Heinrich,1988; Miller, 1988]) and further suggest that the middleEocene–late Oligocene phase of rapid cooling accounts formost of the exhumation.

8.3. Tectonic Exhumation Models

[75] Several kinematic scenarios are capable of linkingthe histories of deformation and early exhumation along theeastern flank of the central Andean plateau. One possibilityinvolves large-scale, southwestward tilting of the CordilleraReal in the backlimb of a belt of NE directed (10–30�SWdipping), crustal-scale thrusts (Figure 14a) [e.g., Heinrich,1988; Sheffels, 1990; Baby et al., 1997]. This tilting wouldproduce the observed systematic decrease in cooling agesfrom SW to NE, and satisfy the observed low magnitudes of

Figure 14. Alternative schematic models for the tectonic evolution of the Cordillera Real, depicting theEocene-Oligocene history of the 11 samples (circles) of the northern transect at three stages: pre-44 Ma;44 Ma; and 25 Ma. (a) Large-scale, down-to-SW tilting of the Cordillera Real due to motion along NEdirected thrust structures. (b) SW directed thrusting linked to an in-sequence duplex system defined byfour thrust sheets (1–4). (c) SW directed transport of a thick thrust sheet over a NE dipping ramp duringtectonic wedging. Hatchures represent zone of possible duplexing.


18 of 22

TC6007

slip along mapped faults. However, restoration of thesample transect to its predeformational state, by untiltingthe samples 10–30�, would require the samples to havebeen originally arrayed over a 6–13 km vertical extent(Figure 14a). Such a configuration is at odds with the pairedmuscovite-biotite 40Ar/39Ar ages requiring that most sam-ples originally resided within a narrow temperature windowat 9–11.5 km depth.[76] A second possibility is that mapped SW directed

thrusts in the Altiplano at the SW front of the centralAndean backthrust belt (Figure 1b) represent a system ofhigh-magnitude thrusts that merge at depth to the NE into aregional decollement horizon (Figure 14b). If this large-magnitude structural system involved a duplex in Ordovi-cian and older rocks [e.g.,McQuarrie et al., 2005b], it couldproduce substantial exhumation. In this model, rocks orig-inally at 5–11 km depth are carried up a system of ramps atdifferent stages during in-sequence thrusting from NE toSW. Although this scenario satisfies the estimated totalexhumation for some samples, it is not consistent with thenortheastward decrease in 40Ar/39Ar cooling ages and therequirement that all samples originated at 9–11.5 km depth.[77] A third model similarly involves transport of a thick

thrust sheet over a large NE dipping ramp (Figure 14c). Thisgeometry is consistent with limited slip along most faults,but invokes a single large-magnitude, SW directed structurethat has not been identified. Nevertheless, several candi-dates exist, including a seismically imaged crustal-scaleboundary between the Altiplano and Eastern Cordillera[Dorbath et al., 1993] that may correspond to the CordilleraReal Fault Zone [Martinez, 1980], a poorly defined struc-ture apparently marking the SW margin of the granite belt(Figure 1b). Because of the lack of cutoffs, it is conceivablethat a structure along the SW flank of the granite beltaccommodated significant displacement. Alternatively, alarge-magnitude structure may be covered by young basinfill or may have fed slip into the Coniri and Huarina faults(Figure 1b) at the SW front of the central Andean backthrustbelt [Martinez, 1980; Sempere et al., 1990]. These faultsplace Devonian on Cenozoic rocks, but their total displace-ment is uncertain.[78] We tentatively favor the third model (Figure 14c),

which is congruent with the structural and thermochrono-logic records. In considering these models, it is important tonote that the proposed large-magnitude structures may link atdepth with a deeper, NE directed decollement (Figure 14c),creating a crustal wedge geometry [e.g., Roeder, 1988;Sempere et al., 1990; McQuarrie and DeCelles, 2001;McQuarrie, 2002; McQuarrie et al., 2005a, 2005b].

8.4. Postshortening Exhumation

[79] On the basis of crosscutting relationships, mostupper crustal shortening in the Cordillera Real (this study)and broader Eastern Cordillera of Bolivia [e.g., Horton,2005] had ceased by �25 Ma. It is difficult to reconcile thisrecord with substantially increased cooling from late Mio-cene onward, raising the possibility that processes otherthan upper crustal shortening played a significant role inyouthful exhumation of the central Andean plateau. Poten-

tial mechanisms include (1) lower crustal thickening byeither thrust stacking [Sheffels, 1990; McQuarrie andDeCelles, 2001; McQuarrie, 2002], ductile deformation[Isacks, 1988], or underplating [Baby et al., 1997] coevalwith upper crustal shortening in the eastern foreland, (2)lithospheric delamination beneath the Altiplano–EasternCordillera boundary [Lamb and Hoke, 1997; Beck andZandt, 2002; Garzione et al., 2006], and (3) coupled ero-sional denudation and rock uplift along the eastern plateaumargin [Masek et al., 1994; Horton, 1999; Montgomeryet al., 2001].[80] Although thermochronologic and structural results

from this study are insufficient to distinguish between thesemodels, regional considerations suggest important differ-ences between the northern and southern parts of the centralAndean plateau. Similar to our findings, AFT results acrossthe Eastern Cordillera 600 km to the south at �21�Sindicate predominantly Eocene–Oligocene cooling relatedto crustal shortening [Ege et al., 2003; Ege, 2004]. Thesedata, however, lack signatures of the late Miocene andyounger exhumation recorded in the Cordillera Real at15.5–17.5�S.[81] Climate is similarly variable along strike, with mark-

edly higher precipitation, erosional denudation, and topo-graphic relief north of �17.5�S contrasting with the arid,low-relief region to the south [e.g., Masek et al., 1994;Horton, 1999; Montgomery et al., 2001]. First-order con-trols on precipitation include zonal atmospheric circulationand orographic effects that focus precipitation along theeastern flank of the Andes north of �17.5�S. This enhancedprecipitation has promoted localized rock uplift, high relief,and headward retreat of the plateau margin [Masek et al.,1994]. We propose that a pronounced north-south gradientin precipitation and erosion may explain rapid late Mioceneand younger exhumation of the Cordillera Real in theabsence of upper crustal shortening. The reason for a lateMiocene inception of amplified exhumation is unknown,but may relate to climate change or deeper crustal/litho-spheric tectonics.

9. Conclusions

[82] Integration of structure, geochronology, thermochro-nology, and sediment provenance demonstrates phases ofrapid exhumation-induced cooling along the eastern marginof the central Andean plateau in Bolivia.[83] 1. Mapping along three transects in the Cordillera

Real reveals principally SW directed thrusts of the centralAndean backthrust belt involving Paleozoic strata andMesozoic-Cenozoic granites. Individual faults exhibit lowmagnitudes of displacement (<2–5 km). An estimatedminimum cumulative slip of �20 km, or �35% NE-SWstrain, is compatible with regional shortening estimates.Nevertheless, exposure of deep levels along the easternflank of the central Andean plateau appears to require adeeper structure that may be linked to either SW or NEdirected thrusts of the middle to lower crust.[84] 2. Deformation timing is constrained by crosscutting

relationships among granites, fold-thrust structures, and


19 of 22

TC6007

basin fill. U-Pb analyses indicate Permo-Triassic and lateOligocene (�26 Ma) ages of granite crystallization. Permo-Triassic granites and lower Paleocene strata predate defor-mation, but the �26 Ma Quimsa Cruz granite postdatesmost upper crustal shortening. Growth strata in the Luribay-Salla succession further indicate SW directed thrustingsynchronous with pre-28 Ma sedimentation. Most fold-thrust deformation is therefore considered to be of Eo-cene-Oligocene age, in contrast to many previous studiessuggesting strictly Neogene age deformation in the centralAndes. The observed map relationships suggest no signif-icant upper crustal deformation after �25 Ma, but do notrule out the possibility of Neogene passive transport ofupper crustal material above deeper structures.[85] 3. As a measure of Cenozoic exhumation, the

moderate-temperature (120–350�C) cooling history is de-termined by a combination of fission track, 40Ar/39Ar, andMDD modeling results for 18 granite samples. The40Ar/39Ar results for muscovite, biotite, and K-feldsparreveal a 45–40 Ma inception of rapid cooling, consistentwith new and previous ZFT data [Benjamin et al., 1987].Modeling of K-feldspar and AFT results indicate that rapidcooling continued throughout the late Eocene and Oligocene,with a reduction in cooling rates at �26 Ma. These resultsagree with the structural record, in which most shorteningpreceded the Neogene. The erosional record of Eocene–Oligocene exhumation is preserved in the eastern Altiplano

basin, where 8 40Ar/39Ar tuff ages and sediment provenancedata reveal sedimentation between �33 and 25 Ma.[86] 4. AFT thermochronology and thermal modeling for

16 granite samples constrain the low-temperature (60–120�C) cooling history. Following an early to middle Mio-cene period of isothermal or slow cooling conditions, a phaseof rapid cooling commenced at�11 Ma. This young coolingepisode postdated the dominantly pre-Neogene upper crustalshortening of the region, suggesting the potential role ofexhumation mechanisms other than upper crustal deforma-tion. Although there are several possibilities, the absence ofrapid late Miocene cooling in the low-precipitation, low-erosion segment of the Eastern Cordillera in southern Boliviaat 21�S [Ege et al., 2003; Ege, 2004] suggests that the moreerosive, high-precipitation climate north of 17.5�S may havedriven youthful exhumation in the Cordillera Real.

[87] Acknowledgments. This research was supported by grants fromthe Geological Society of America and Sigma Xi (awarded to Gillis), andNational Science Foundation grant EAR-0510441 (awarded to Horton).The 40Ar/39Ar analyses were performed with assistance from Ana Vucic.Fission track analyses were conducted by Raymond Donelick. We appre-ciate helpful discussions with Alan Clark, Nadine McQuarrie, DanielStockli, Sohrab Tawackoli, Carmala Garzione, Gary Axen, An Yin, HollyCaprio, and Alexander Robinson. Field logistical support was provided bySohrab Tawackoli, Pedro Churata, and Jaime Tito of Sergeotecmin (LaPaz). Reviews by Jason Barnes, Barbara Carrapa, and Associate EditorTodd Ehlers improved the manuscript.


20 of 22

TC6007

ReferencesAllmendinger, R. W., T. E. Jordan, S. M. Kay, and B. L.

Isacks (1997), The evolution of the Altiplano-Punaplateau of the central Andes, Annu. Rev. Earth Pla-net. Sci., 25, 139–174.

Anders, M. H., K. M. Gregory-Wodzicki, andM. Spiegelman (2002), A critical evaluation of lateTertiary accelerated uplift rates for the EasternCordillera, central Andes of Bolivia, J. Geol.,110, 89–100.

Arriagada, C., P. Roperch, P. R. Cobbold, andC. Mpodozis (2005), Numerical plan view restora-tion of the Bolivian orocline, paper presented at In-ternational Symposium on Andean Geodynamics,ORSTOM, Paris.

Baby, P., P. Rochat, G. Mascle, and G. Herail (1997),Neogene shortening contribution to crustal thicken-ing in the back arc of the central Andes, Geology,25, 883–886.

Baxter, E. F., D. J. DePaolo, and P. R. Renne (2002),Spatially correlated anomalous 40Ar/39Ar ‘‘age’’variations in biotites about a lithologic contact nearSimplon Pass, Switzerland: A mechanistic explana-tion for excess Ar, Geochim. Cosmchim. Acta, 66,1067–1083.

Beck, S. L., and G. Zandt (2002), The nature of orogeniccrust in the central Andes, J. Geophys. Res.,107(B10), 2230, doi:10.1029/2000JB000124.

Benjamin, M. T. (1986), Fission-track ages on someBolivian plutonic rocks: Implications for the Ter-tiary uplift and erosion history of the Altiplano-Cor-dillera Real, M.S. thesis, 58 pp., Dartmouth Coll.,Hanover, N. H.

Benjamin, M. T., N. M. Johnson, and C. W. Naeser(1987), Recent rapid uplift in the Bolivian Andes:Evidence from fission-track dating, Geology, 15,680–683.

Carleson, W. D., R. A. Donelick, and R. A. Ketcham(1999), Variability of apatite fission-track annealingkinetics: I. Experimental results, Am. Mineral., 84,1213–1223.

Carlier, G., G. Grandin, G. Laubacher, R. Marocco, andF. Megard (1982), Present knowledge of the mag-matic evolution of the Eastern Cordillera, Peru,Earth Sci. Rev., 18, 253 –283.

Crough, S. T. (1983), Apatite fission-track dating oferosion in the eastern Andes, Bolivia, Earth Planet.Sci. Lett., 64, 396–397.

Dallmeyer, R. D., and T. Rivers (1983), Recognition ofextraneous argon components through incremental-release 40Ar/39Ar analysis of biotite and hornblendeacross the Grenvillian metamorphic gradient insouthwestern Labrador, Geochim. Cosmchim. Acta,47, 413–428.

DeCelles, P. G., and B. K. Horton (2003), Early tomiddle Tertiary foreland basin development andthe history of Andean crustal shortening in Bolivia,Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 115, 58–77.

Donelick, R. A., R. A. Ketcham, and W. D. Carleson(1999), Variability of apatite fission-track annealingkinetics: II. Crystallographic orientation effects,Am. Mineral., 84, 1224–1234.

Dorbath, C., M. Granet, G. Poupinet, and C. Martinez(1993), A teleseismic study of the Altiplano andEastern Cordillera in northern Bolivia: New con-straints on a lithospheric model, J. Geophys. Res.,98, 9825–9844.

Ege, H. (2004), Exhumations- und Hebungs-geschichte der zentralen Anden in Sudbolivien(21�S) durch Spaltspur-Thermochronologie enApatit, Ph.D. thesis, 173 pp., Freie Univ.,Berlin.

Ege, H., E. Sobel, V. Jacobshagen, E. Scheuber, andD. Mertmann (2003), Exhumation history of thecentral Andes of southern Bolivia by apatite fissiontrack dating, Rev. Tec. Yacimientos Petrol. Fis.Bolivianos, 21, 165–172.

Evernden, J. F., S. J. Kriz, and C. Cherroni (1977),Potassium-argon ages of some Bolivian rocks,Econ. Geol., 72, 1042–1061.

Farrar, E., A. H. Clark, D. J. Kontak, and D. A. Archibald(1988), Zongo –San Gaban zone: Eocene foreland

boundary of the central Andean orogen, northwestBolivia and southeast Peru, Geology, 16, 55–58.

Fitzgerald, P. G. (1994), Thermochronologic constraintson post-Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the centralTransantarctic Mountains, Antarctica, Tectonics, 13,818 –836.

Fitzgerald, P. G., and A. J. W. Gleadow (1988), Fission-track geochronology, tectonics and structure of theTransantarctic Mountains in northern Victoria Land,Antarctica, Chem. Geol., 73, 169–198.

Fitzgerald, P. G., R. B. Sorkhabi, T. F. Redfield, andE. Stump (1995), Uplift and denudation of theAlaska Range: A case study in the use of apatitefission track thermochronology to determine abso-lute uplift parameters, J. Geophys. Res., 100,20,175–20,191.

Foster, D. A., T. M. Harrison, P. Copeland, and M. T.Heizler (1990), Effects of excess argon within largediffusion domains on K-feldspar age spectra, Geo-chim. Cosmchim. Acta, 54, 1699–1708.

Garzione, C. N., P. Molnar, J. C. Libarkin, and B. J.MacFadden (2006), Rapid late Miocene rise of theBolivian Altiplano: Evidence for removal of mantlelithosphere, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 241, 543–556,doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.11.026.

Gillis, R. J., B. K. Horton, and M. Grove (2004), Ex-humation history and basin development along theeastern margin of the central Andean plateau, Boli-via, Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs, 36, 433.

Gregory-Wodzicki, K. M. (2000), Uplift history of thecentral and northern Andes: A review, Geol. Soc.Am. Bull., 112, 1091–1105.

Green, P. F. (1986), On the thermo-tectonic evolution ofnorthern England: Evidence from fission track ana-lysis, Geol. Mag., 153, 493 –506.

Gubbels, T. L., B. L. Isacks, and E. Farrar (1993),High-level surfaces, plateau uplift, and foreland de-velopment, Bolivian central Andes, Geology, 21,695 –698.

Harrison, T. M., M. T. Heitzler, O. M. Lovera,W. Chen, and M. Grove (1994), A chlorine disin-


21 of 22

TC6007

fectant for excess argon released from K-feldsparduring step heating, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 123,95– 104.

Heinrich, S. M. (1988), Geology and geochronology ofthe Zongo river valley, Cordillera Oriental, NWBolivia, M.S. thesis, 185 pp., Queen’s Univ., King-ston, Ont., Canada.

Henry, S. G., and H. N. Pollack (1988), Terrestrialheat flow above the Andean subduction zone inBolivia and Peru, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 15,153–15,162.

Horton, B. K. (1999), Erosional control on the geome-try and kinematics of thrust belt development in thecentral Andes, Tectonics, 18, 1292–1304.

Horton, B. K. (2005), Revised deformation history ofthe central Andes: Inferences from Cenozoic fore-deep and intermontane basins of the Eastern Cordil-lera, Bolivia, Tectonics, 24, TC3011, doi:10.1029/2003TC001619.

Horton, B. K., B. A. Hampton, and G. L. Waanders(2001), Paleogene synorogenic sedimentation inthe Altiplano plateau and implications for initialmountain building in the central Andes, Geol.Soc. Am. Bull., 113, 1387–1400.

Horton, B. K., B. A. Hampton, B. N. LaReau, andE. Baldellon (2002), Tertiary provenance history ofthe northern and central Altiplano (central Andes,Bolivia): A detrital record of plateau-margin tec-tonics, J. Sediment. Res., 72, 711 –726.

Ingersoll, R. V., T. F. Bullard, R. L. Ford, J. P. Grimm,J. D. Pickle, and S. W. Sares (1984), The effect ofgrain size on detrital modes: A test of the Gazzi-Dickinson point-counting method, J. Sediment. Pet-rol., 54, 103–116.

Isacks, B. L. (1988), Uplift of the central Andean pla-teau and bending of the Bolivian orocline, J. Geo-phys. Res., 93, 3211–3231.

Kay, R. F., B. J.MacFadden, R. H.Madden,H. Sandeman,and F. Anaya (1998), Revised age of the Salla beds,Bolivia, and its bearing on the age of the DeseadanSouth American land mammal ‘‘age’’, J. VertebratePaleontol., 18, 189–199.

Kennan, L., S. Lamb, and C. Rundle (1995), K-Ar datesfrom the Altiplano and Cordillera Oriental of Boli-via: Implications for Cenozoic stratigraphy and tec-tonics, J. S. Am. Earth Sci., 8, 163–186.

Kennan, L., S. H. Lamb, and L. Hoke (1997), High-altitude palaeosurfaces in the Bolivian Andes: Evi-dence for late Cenozoic surface uplift, in Palaeo-

surfaces: Recognition, Reconstruction andPalaeoenvironmental Interpretation, edited byM. Widdowson,Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 120, 307–323.

Ketcham, R. A., R. A. Donelick, and W. D. Carleson(1999), Variability of apatite fission-track annealingkinetics: III. Extrapolation to geological time scales,Am. Mineral., 84, 1235–1255.

Ketcham, R. A., R. A. Donelick, and M. B. Donelick(2000), AFTSolve: A program for multi-kineticmodeling of apatite fission-track data, Geol. Mater.Res., 2, 1 –32.

Kley, J., and C. R. Monaldi (1998), Tectonic shorteningand crustal thickness in the central Andes: Howgood is the correlation?, Geology, 26, 723 –726.

Kontak, D. J., E. Farrar, A. H. Clark, and D. A.Arachibald (1990), Eocene tectono-thermal rejuve-nation of an upper Paleozoic-lowerMesozoic terranein the Cordillera de Carabaya, Puno, southeasternPeru, revealed by K-Ar and 40Ar/39Ar dating, J. S.Am. Earth Sci., 3, 231–246.

Lamb, S., and L. Hoke (1997), Origin of the high pla-teau in the central Andes, Bolivia, South America,Tectonics, 16, 623–649.

Lamb, S., L. Hoke, L. Kennan, and J. F. Dewey (1997),Cenozoic evolution of the Central Andes in Boliviaand northern Chile, in Orogeny Through Time, edi-ted by J. P. Burg, and M. Ford, Geol. Soc. Spec.Publ., 121, 237–264.

Lancelot, J. R., G. Laubacher, R. Marocco, andU. Renaud (1978), U/Pb radiochronology of twogranite plutons from the Eastern Cordillera (Peru):Extent of Permian magmatic activity and conse-quences, Geol. Rundsch., 67, 236–243.

Laslett, G. M., P. F. Green, I. R. Duddy, and A. J. W.Gleadow (1987), Thermal annealing of fissiontracks in apatite 2. A quantitative analysis, Chem.Geol., 65, 1 –13.

Lee, J. K. W. (1995), Multipath diffusion in geochro-nology, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 120, 60–82.

Lehmann, B. (1978), A Precambrian core sample fromthe Altiplano/Bolivia, Geol. Rundsch., 67, 270 –278.

Lovera, O. M., F. M. Richter, and T. M. Harrison(1989), The 40Ar/39Ar thermochronometry forslowly cooled samples having a distribution of dif-fusion domain sizes, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 17,917–17,935.

Lovera, O. M., M. Grove, T. M. Harrison, and K. I.Mahon (1997), Systematic analysis of K-feldspar40Ar/39Ar step heating results: I. Significance ofactivation energy determinations, Geochim. Cosm-chim. Acta, 61, 3171–3192.

Lovera, O. M., M. Grove, T. M. Harrison, and K. I.Mahon (2002), Systematic analysis of K-feldspar40Ar/39Ar step heating results: II. Relevance of la-boratory argon diffusion properties to nature, Geo-chim. Cosmchim. Acta, 66, 1237–1255.

Lutz, T. M., and G. Omar (1991), An inverse method ofmodeling thermal histories from apatite fission-track, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 104, 181–195.

MacFadden, B. J., K. E. Campbell, R. L. Cifelli,O. Siles, N. M. Johnson, C. W. Naeser, and P. K.Zeitler (1985), Magnetic polarity stratigraphy andmammalian fauna of the Deseadan (late Oligo-cene – early Miocene) Salla Beds of northern Boli-via, J. Geol., 93, 223–250.

Marsh, S. P., D. H. Richter, S. Ludington, E. Soria-Escalante, and A. Escobar-Diaz (1992), Geologicmap of the Altiplano and Cordillera Occidental,Bolivia, in Geology and mineral resources of theAltiplano and Cordillera Occidental, Bolivia:U.S.G.S. and Servicio Geologico de Bolivia, U.S.Geol. Surv. Bull., 1975, plate 1.

Martinez, C. (1980), Structure et evolution de lachaıne hercynienne et da la chacirc;ne andine dansle nord de la Cordillere des Andes de Bolivie, Trav.Doc. ORSTOM, 119, 352 pp.

Masek, J. G., B. L. Isacks, T. L. Gubbels, and E. J.Fielding (1994), Erosion and tectonics at the mar-gins of continental plateaus, J. Geophys. Res., 99,13,941–13,956.

McBride, S. L., R. C. R. Robertson, A. H. Clark, andE. Farrar (1983), Magmatic and metallogeneticepisodes in the northern tin belt, Cordillera Real,Bolivia, Geol. Rundsch., 72, 685–713.

McBride, S. L., A. H. Clark, E. Farrar, and D. A.Archibald (1987), Delimitation of a cryptic Eocenetectono-thermal domain in the Eastern Cordilleraof the Bolivian Andes through K-Ar dating and40Ar-39Ar step-heating, J. Geol. Soc. London,144, 243–255.

McDougall, I., and T. M. Harrison (1999), Geochronol-ogy andThermochronology by the 40Ar/39ArMethod,2nd ed., 269 pp., Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

McQuarrie, N. (2002), The kinematic history of thecentral Andean fold-thrust belt, Bolivia: Implica-tions for building a high plateau, Geol. Soc. Am.Bull., 114, 950 –963.

McQuarrie, N., and P. G. DeCelles (2001), Geometryand structural evolution of the central Andean back-thrust belt, Bolivia, Tectonics, 20, 669–692.

McQuarrie,N., B.K.Horton,G. Zandt, S. Beck, and P.G.DeCelles (2005a), Lithospheric evolution of the An-dean fold-thrust belt, Bolivia, and the origin of thecentral Andean plateau, Tectonophysics, 399, 15 –37.

McQuarrie, N., J. B. Barnes, and T. A. Ehlers (2005b),The relationship between deformation and exhuma-tion in the central Andean plateau, Bolivia, Geol.Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs, 37, 271.

McRae, L. E. (1990), Paleomagnetic isochrons, un-steadiness, and uniformity of sedimentation inMiocene intermontane basin sediments at Salla,eastern Andean Cordillera, Bolivia, J. Geol., 98,479–500.

Miller, J. F. (1988), Granite petrogenesis in the Cordil-lera Real, Bolivia and crustal evolution in the cen-tral Andes, Ph.D. thesis, 316 pp., Open Univ.,London.

Miller, J. F., and N. J. Harris (1989), Evolution ofcontinental crust in the central Andes: Constraintsfrom Nd isotope systematics, Geology, 17, 615–617.

Montgomery, D. R., G. Balco, and S. D. Willett (2001),Climate, tectonics, and the morphology of the An-des, Geology, 29, 579–582.

Moore, M. A., and P. C. England (2001), On theinference of denudation rates from cooling agesof minerals, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 185, 265–284.

Newell, N. D. (1949), Geology of the Lake Titicacaregion, Peru and Bolivia, Mem. Geol. Soc. Am.,36, 111 pp.

Pareja, J., C. Vargas, R. Suarez, R. Ballon, R. Carrasco,and C. Villaroel (1978), Mapa geologico de Boliviay memoria explicative, scale 1:1,000,000, 27 pp.,Yacimientos Petrol. Fis. Bolivianos and Serv. Geol.de Bolivia, La Paz.

Parsons, I., W. L. Brown, and J. V. Smith (1999),40Ar/39Ar thermochronology using alkali feldspars:Real thermal history or mathematical mirage of mi-crotexture?, Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 136, 92 –110.

Roddick, J. C. (1978), The application of isochron dia-grams in 40Ar-39Ar dating: A discussion, Earth Pla-net. Sci. Lett., 41, 233–244.

Roddick, J. C., R. A. Cliff, and D. C. Rex (1980), Theevolution of excess argon in Alpine biotites - An40Ar-39Ar analysis, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 48,185 –208.

Roeder, D. (1988), Andean-age structure of Eastern Cor-dillera (province of La Paz, Bolivia), Tectonics, 7,23–39.

Safran, E. B. (1998), Channel network incision andpatterns of mountain geomorphology, Ph.D. thesis,326 pp., Univ. of Calif., Santa Barbara.

Sandeman, H. A., A. H. Clark, and E. Farrar (1995),An integrated tectono-magmatic model for theevolution of the southern Peruvian Andes (13–20�S) since 55 Ma, Int. Geol. Rev., 37, 1039–1073.

Santos, J. O. S., L. A. Hartmann, H. E. Gaudette, D. I.Groves, N. J. Mcnaughton, and I. R. Fletcher(2000), A new understanding of the provinces ofthe Amazon craton based on integration of fieldmapping and U-Pb and Sm-Nd geochronology,Gondwana Res., 3, 453–488.

Sempere, T., G. Herail, J. Oller, and M. G. Bonhomme(1990), Late Oligocene– early Miocene major tec-tonic crisis and related basins in Bolivia, Geology,18, 946–949.

Servicio Geologico de Bolivia (Geobol) (1993), Cartageologica de Bolivia, Ichoca (Hoja 6142), scale1:100000, La Paz.

Servicio Geologico de Bolivia (Geobol) (1995), Cartageologica de Bolivia, Milluni (Hoja 5945), scale1:100000, La Paz.

Servicio Geologico de Bolivia (Geobol) (1997), Cartageologica de Bolivia, Inquisivi (Hoja 6143), scale1:100000, La Paz.

Servicio Nacional de Geologıa y Tecnico de Minas andYacimientos Petrolıferos Fiscales Bolivianos(2003), Mapa geologico de Bolivia, scale1:100,000, La Paz.

Sheffels, B. M. (1990), Lower bound on the amount ofcrustal shortening in the central Bolivian Andes,Geology, 18, 812–815.

Stuwe, K., L. White, and R. Brown (1994), The influ-ence of eroding topography on steady state iso-therms: Application to fission track analysis,Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 124, 63–74.

Suarez, R., and E. Diaz (1996), Lexico estratigrafico deBolivia, Rev. Tec. Yacimientos Petrol. Fis. Bolivia-nos, 17(1 –2), 7 –227.

Willett, S. D. (1997), Inverse modeling of annealing offission tracks in apatite. 1: A controlled randomsearch method, Am. J. Sci., 297, 939–969.


22 of 22

TC6007

Worner, G., J. Lezaun, A. Beck, V. Heber, F. Lucassen,E. Zinngrebe, R. Rossling, and H. G. Wilke (2000),Precambrian and Early Paleozoic evolution of theAndean basement at Belen (northern Chile) andCerro Uyarani (western Bolivia Altiplano), J. S.Am. Earth Sci., 13, 717–737.

Zeitler, P. K., and J. D. Fitz Gerald (1986), Saddle-shaped 40Ar/39Ar spectra from young, microstruc-

turally complex potassium feldspars, Geochim.Cosmchim. Acta, 50, 1185–1199.

��R. J. Gillis, Division of Geological and Geophysical

Surveys, State of Alaska Department of NaturalResources, 3354 College Road, Fairbanks, AK 99709-3707, USA. ([email protected])

M. Grove, Department of Earth and Space Sciences,University of California, 595 Charles Young Drive East,3806 Geology Building, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567,USA.

B. K. Horton, Department of Geological Sciences,Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, 1University Station C1100, Austin, TX 78712-0254,USA.

1

U-Pb Results

Table A1. U-Pb isotopic dataa

03RJG16 (Illampu) 206Pb/238U* ± 1� 207Pb/235U* ± 1� 207Pb/206Pb*±1� 206Pb/238U

± 1� (Ma

207Pb/235U ± 1� (Ma)

207Pb/206Pb ± 1� (Ma)

% Rad. 206Pb (x 10-2) (x 10-4) (x 10-1) (x 10-3) (x 10-2) (x 10-4)

226.1 1.84 226.9 2.29 234.5 20.9 100 3.57 2.96 2.504 2.82 5.086 4.6 237.8 6.14 242.5 5.09 287.6 35.4 100 3.758 9.88 2.697 6.36 5.205 8.07 238.8 2.39 241.7 3.48 270.5 25.7 100 3.773 3.85 2.688 4.35 5.166 5.8 241.9 2.67 240.6 3.17 228 18 100 3.823 4.3 2.673 3.95 5.072 3.95 244.3 3.44 242.5 2.71 225.5 18.9 100 3.862 5.55 2.698 3.39 5.066 4.14 245.7 1.84 240.7 2.17 192 11.9 100 3.885 2.96 2.675 2.7 4.994 2.55 248 4.74 250 4.82 268.5 23.5 100 3.922 7.63 2.791 6.07 5.162 5.28 250 3.33 246.3 3.31 210.8 18.7 100 3.954 5.37 2.745 4.15 5.034 4.06

252.5 2.3 251 3.24 236.6 18.9 100 3.994 3.71 2.804 4.08 5.091 4.17 421.2 6.81 423.4 8.94 435.9 43 99.6 6.751 11.3 5.174 13.4 5.559 10.7 435.1 7.81 441.2 13.3 473.5 61 99.65 6.982 13 5.443 20.3 5.654 15.6 Crystallization age: 226.1 ± 1.8 Ma (youngest analysis, in bold)

RJG1 (Yani) 206Pb/238U* ± 1� 207Pb/235U* ± 1� 207Pb/206Pb*±1� 206Pb/238U

± 1� (Ma

207Pb/235U ± 1� (Ma)

207Pb/206Pb ± 1� (Ma)

% Rad. 206Pb (x 10-2) (x 10-4) (x 10-1) (x 10-3) (x 10-2) (x 10-4)

221.5 4.69 238.6 11.3 410.8 91.1 100 3.496 7.53 2.649 14.1 5.496 22.4 222.1 5.24 232.6 6.18 340 44.9 100 3.506 8.41 2.574 7.66 5.326 10.6 224.9 2.07 215.7 5.12 116.9 54.3 99.65 3.55 3.32 2.367 6.24 4.836 11.1 226.3 4 231.3 6.08 281.6 61 100 3.573 6.43 2.558 7.52 5.191 13.8 228.6 1.33 222.9 2.36 163 24.8 99.84 3.609 2.13 2.454 2.89 4.932 5.23 231.4 6.24 241.6 9.3 341.7 44.9 100 3.655 10 2.686 11.6 5.33 10.6 233.6 4.93 253.1 8.08 438.4 77.3 100 3.69 7.93 2.831 10.2 5.565 19.3 234.4 3.11 238.6 5.5 280.6 44.8 100 3.703 5 2.649 6.86 5.189 10.2 256.6 2.05 258.8 4.96 278.4 42.6 99.84 4.061 3.3 2.903 6.3 5.184 9.65 274.4 3.99 275.3 7.83 283.3 65.7 99.76 4.348 6.45 3.115 10.1 5.195 14.9 325.8 10.9 410.2 19.2 917.9 70.3 99.76 5.184 17.8 4.978 28.4 6.965 23.8 379.6 3.23 440.6 4.3 773.3 16.5 99.87 6.065 5.32 5.433 6.54 6.497 5.09 444.9 7.86 441.6 11.4 424.5 58.1 99.72 7.146 13.1 5.449 17.4 5.53 14.4 453.6 11.1 461.8 14 503 57.2 99.62 7.29 18.5 5.759 21.7 5.73 14.9 473.5 19.3 543.5 21.1 849 39.6 100 7.622 32.2 7.079 35.4 6.736 12.8 483.8 8.29 499.6 8.04 572.8 23.9 99.91 7.794 13.9 6.357 13 5.916 6.49 531.1 7.06 544.3 8.01 599.7 28.6 99.83 8.588 11.9 7.092 13.5 5.989 7.92 593.9 8.13 596.1 5.89 604.5 27.1 99.84 9.65 13.8 7.987 10.4 6.003 7.52 612.5 5.3 605.9 7.41 581.3 33.6 99.96 9.968 9.04 8.162 13.3 5.939 9.18 Crystallization age: 227.9 ± 3.5 Ma (weighted mean of 8 analyses, in bold)

RJG8 (Yani)

206Pb/238U* ± 1� 207Pb/235U* ± 1� 207Pb/206Pb*±1� 206Pb/238U ± 1� (Ma

207Pb/235U ± 1� (Ma)

207Pb/206Pb ± 1� (Ma)

% Rad. 206Pb (x 10-2) (x 10-4) (x 10-1) (x 10-3) (x 10-2) (x 10-4)

216.9 8.49 246.8 14.6 542.1 125 100 3.422 13.6 2.752 18.3 5.833 33.5 230.9 3.48 238.8 5.01 317.6 34.4 100 3.646 5.59 2.652 6.24 5.274 7.98 231.7 3.97 236.8 5.37 287.9 40.4 100 3.659 6.38 2.626 6.67 5.206 9.2 232.3 4.63 243.3 7.8 351.7 84.8 100 3.669 7.44 2.708 9.76 5.354 20.1

2

257.8 5.34 255.1 6.07 230.5 27.1 100 4.081 8.62 2.857 7.68 5.077 5.97 267 7.62 282 11.3 407.7 61.1 100 4.229 12.3 3.201 14.6 5.489 15

Crystallization age: 230.5 ± 4.4 Ma (weighted mean of 4 analyses, in bold) RZG17 (Huayna Potosí)

206Pb/238U* ± 1� 207Pb/235U* ± 1� 207Pb/206Pb*±1� 206Pb/238U ± 1� (Ma

207Pb/235U ± 1� (Ma)

207Pb/206Pb ± 1� (Ma)

% Rad. 206Pb (x 10-2) (x 10-4) (x 10-1) (x 10-3) (x 10-2) (x 10-4)

221.5 4.37 234.2 5.27 363 47 100 3.496 7.02 2.594 6.54 5.381 11.2 223.6 3.07 225.8 4.35 248.5 38.3 100 3.529 4.93 2.49 5.36 5.117 8.52 224.7 2.39 218.2 3.29 148.7 34.9 100 3.547 3.84 2.397 4.02 4.902 7.29 231.6 2.13 232.7 2.85 244.6 18.8 100 3.657 3.43 2.576 3.53 5.108 4.16 233.2 1.99 233.1 2.8 231.8 31.5 100 3.684 3.2 2.581 3.47 5.08 6.94 234.4 2.13 235.1 2.67 241.6 17.8 100 3.704 3.42 2.605 3.32 5.102 3.95 234.9 3.17 233.4 2.75 217.9 20.5 100 3.711 5.1 2.584 3.4 5.05 4.48 237.4 3.21 226.9 14.3 118.6 156 93.77 3.752 5.16 2.503 17.6 4.84 32 238.7 2.87 239.9 3.43 251.5 24.9 100 3.772 4.62 2.665 4.27 5.124 5.55 244.4 3.04 251.1 3.99 313.7 38 100 3.864 4.89 2.805 5.03 5.265 8.79 325.4 6.8 344.5 8.43 475.5 38.1 99.87 5.177 11.1 4.039 11.7 5.659 9.74 382 3.21 384.7 5.62 400.5 35.7 99.74 6.106 5.29 4.606 8.09 5.471 8.71

Crystallization age: 229.6 ± 4.8 Ma (weighted mean of 7 analyses, in bold)

RZG11 (Zongo)206Pb/238U* ± 1� 207Pb/235U* ± 1� 207Pb/206Pb*±1� 206Pb/238U

± 1� (Ma

207Pb/235U ± 1� (Ma)

207Pb/206Pb ± 1� (Ma)

% Rad. 206Pb (x 10-2) (x 10-4) (x 10-1) (x 10-3) (x 10-2) (x 10-4)

229 4.33 230.2 3.45 242.1 17.6 100 3.616 6.96 2.544 4.26 5.103 3.89 234.1 2.36 234.9 2.07 242.9 10.8 100 3.698 3.79 2.602 2.57 5.105 2.38 237.2 2.57 238.6 2.66 252.9 9.56 100 3.748 4.14 2.649 3.32 5.127 2.13 244.4 2.66 242.5 2.84 223.5 18.3 100 3.865 4.29 2.697 3.55 5.062 4.01 247.4 2.37 243.3 2.31 203.9 13.6 100 3.912 3.82 2.707 2.89 5.019 2.95 255.3 2.78 253.4 2.55 235.5 9.14 100 4.04 4.48 2.835 3.23 5.088 2.02 256.1 3.57 259.5 3.34 290.7 9.4 100 4.053 5.76 2.913 4.24 5.212 2.14 260.9 4.8 259.5 4.9 246.9 18.2 100 4.13 7.75 2.912 6.24 5.114 4.04 262.6 3.08 260.1 3.68 237.6 18.1 100 4.158 4.98 2.92 4.68 5.093 3.99 265.5 2.97 263 2.76 240.4 10.1 100 4.205 4.8 2.956 3.52 5.099 2.24 266.4 2.55 290.9 2.88 493 11.7 100 4.219 4.12 3.318 3.77 5.704 3.04 307.6 2.36 380.1 14.4 849.1 88.6 97.04 4.888 3.85 4.54 20.6 6.736 28.7 322.1 10.1 351.6 10.2 551.7 35 100 5.123 16.5 4.138 14.1 5.858 9.4 329.8 6.8 457.5 8.5 1164 13.8 99.91 5.248 11.1 5.692 13.1 7.866 5.46 343.9 5.02 451.3 7.79 1044 27.6 99.63 5.479 8.21 5.597 12 7.409 10.1 Crystallization age: 236.6 ± 9.3 Ma (weighted mean of 4 analyses, in bold)

QCG5 (Quimsa Cruz – Mina Argentina granodiorite)206Pb/238U* ± 1� 207Pb/235U* ± 1� 207Pb/206Pb*±1� 206Pb/238U

± 1� (Ma

207Pb/235U ± 1� (Ma)

207Pb/206Pb ± 1� (Ma)

% Rad. 206Pb (x 10-2) (x 10-4) (x 10-1) (x 10-3) (x 10-2) (x 10-4)

24.58 0.571 27.51 1.21 291.6 96.7 100 0.3821 0.889 0.2747 1.22 5.214 22.1 25.66 0.369 25.69 2.05 28.67 191 99.56 0.3988 0.575 0.2562 2.07 4.66 37.1 25.84 0.238 26.81 1.42 115.3 130 100 0.4016 0.371 0.2676 1.43 4.833 26.6 26.08 0.297 25.98 1.05 17.44 98.7 100 0.4053 0.462 0.2592 1.07 4.638 19 26.21 0.277 26.78 1.17 77.94 91.1 100 0.4074 0.432 0.2672 1.19 4.757 18.3 26.24 0.627 26.92 0.928 87.65 54.5 99.95 0.4079 0.976 0.2686 0.938 4.777 11 26.41 0.348 26.43 0.999 28.17 91.6 100 0.4106 0.543 0.2637 1.01 4.659 17.8

3

26.52 0.276 26.53 0.674 27.28 51.1 100 0.4122 0.43 0.2647 0.682 4.657 9.92 27.93 0.355 27.52 2.79 -1 0.0045 99.23 0.4343 0.553 0.2747 2.82 4.588 45 28.75 0.315 28.5 0.924 8.104 81.5 100 0.4469 0.492 0.2847 0.936 4.62 15.6 Crystallization age: 26.02 ± 0.41 Ma (weighted mean of 8 analyses, in bold)

QCG7 (Quimsa Cruz – Mina Viloco monzogranite)206Pb/238U* ± 1� 207Pb/235U* ± 1� 207Pb/206Pb*±1� 206Pb/238U

± 1� (Ma

207Pb/235U ± 1� (Ma)

207Pb/206Pb ± 1� (Ma)

% Rad. 206Pb (x 10-2) (x 10-4) (x 10-1) (x 10-3) (x 10-2) (x 10-4)

24.82 0.307 24.71 1.54 14.37 146 99.43 0.3858 0.478 0.2464 1.55 4.632 28.1 24.93 0.307 25.32 0.913 63.07 82.1 99.94 0.3875 0.477 0.2525 0.922 4.727 16.3 24.94 0.528 27.83 2.17 285.6 180 100 0.3876 0.823 0.2779 2.19 5.2 40.8 25.17 0.423 25.87 1.71 91.66 148 99.79 0.3912 0.659 0.2581 1.73 4.785 29.9 25.51 0.267 26.06 0.964 77.1 93.5 100 0.3966 0.415 0.26 0.974 4.755 18.7 25.85 0.156 25.77 0.586 18.34 53.8 100 0.4018 0.243 0.257 0.592 4.64 10.4 25.91 0.211 25.68 0.778 4.075 66 100 0.4027 0.329 0.2561 0.786 4.612 12.6 26.09 0.244 26.43 0.614 57.79 53.9 100 0.4056 0.379 0.2638 0.62 4.717 10.7 26.24 0.2 26.86 0.479 82.21 38.9 100 0.4079 0.312 0.268 0.484 4.766 7.81 26.42 0.279 26.84 0.536 64.74 44.1 100 0.4107 0.434 0.2679 0.542 4.731 8.77 1678 18.8 2160 11.8 2656 5.6 100 29.73 37.8 73.93 97.7 18.04 6.09 Crystallization age: 25.65 ± 0.41 Ma (weighted mean of 10 analyses, in bold)

4

40Ar/

39Ar Results

Table A2. 40Ar/39Ar step-heating analytical resultsa

RJG7 Biotite (5.6 mg; J = 0.003574)

T (°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar

%40Ar* 40Ar*/39ArK ±σ40/39 Age (Ma) ±σAge

500 311.544 0.2376 24.658 1037.73 2.851 0.51 1.56 4.86 21.78 31.09 169.3 700 8.998 0.0199 1.267 8.783 195.039 35.10 70.77 6.37 0.04 40.60 0.68 770 6.765 0.0183 1.175 1.126 157.284 63.01 94.56 6.40 0.02 40.79 0.63 840 7.295 0.0186 4.185 3.005 52.669 72.35 87.33 6.37 0.05 40.63 0.69 900 8.386 0.0196 5.083 6.639 43.575 80.08 76.17 6.39 0.06 40.73 0.74 960 7.603 0.0189 2.678 3.999 63.410 91.33 83.98 6.39 0.04 40.72 0.68

1020 7.416 0.0186 4.950 3.354 34.385 97.43 86.13 6.39 0.06 40.74 0.75 1080 9.997 0.0195 24.128 11.912 7.878 98.82 64.35 6.44 0.27 41.08 2.16 1150 17.691 0.0267 516.695 37.220 2.763 99.31 37.73 6.70 1.23 42.66 9.64 500 30.598 0.0286 135.435 60.892 3.868 99.99 41.06 12.58 1.40 79.34 11.17

Total gas age: 40.92 ± 1.23 Ma Weighted mean age: 40.74 ± 0.65 Ma RJG7 Muscovite (4.4 mg; J = 0.003572)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 922.931 0.8118 18.602 3076.14 1.124 0.20 1.51 13.90 21.18 87.41 157.9 600 34.252 0.0301 13.711 99.911 1.756 0.52 13.67 4.70 1.02 30.01 6.90 700 17.316 0.0186 7.660 38.015 6.409 1.67 34.89 6.05 0.28 38.56 1.91 770 14.733 0.0169 3.571 28.134 14.890 4.35 43.31 6.39 0.15 40.68 1.17 840 8.281 0.0131 0.370 4.858 161.411 33.38 82.24 6.81 0.03 43.36 0.70 880 7.421 0.0126 0.315 2.978 101.204 51.58 87.66 6.51 0.03 41.45 0.64 920 8.208 0.0132 0.328 5.552 42.880 59.30 79.56 6.53 0.05 41.61 0.71 960 9.413 0.0136 0.653 9.643 24.932 63.78 69.32 6.53 0.08 41.59 0.83

1000 9.999 0.0143 0.608 11.432 22.120 67.76 65.83 6.59 0.08 41.95 0.82 1070 8.869 0.0134 0.713 7.353 38.144 74.62 75.08 6.66 0.05 42.43 0.73 1150 7.584 0.0128 0.516 3.490 91.939 91.15 85.93 6.52 0.03 41.52 0.66 500 10.243 0.0133 1.962 6.903 49.182 99.99 79.73 8.17 0.05 51.89 0.83

Total gas age: 43.05 ± 0.89 Ma Weighted mean age: 42.87 ± 1.13 Ma RJG8 Biotite (4.5 mg; J = 0.003575)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 145.551 0.1205 34.044 476.806 8.446 2.08 3.18 4.62 1.45 29.57 10.91 700 16.283 0.0271 7.062 32.801 80.170 21.82 40.26 6.56 0.09 41.80 0.89 770 8.605 0.0215 4.800 4.973 91.381 44.32 82.50 7.10 0.03 45.23 0.71 840 9.324 0.0215 7.163 7.618 39.633 54.08 75.45 7.04 0.07 44.83 0.84 900 10.025 0.0223 8.029 10.642 55.388 67.72 68.27 6.85 0.06 43.62 0.76 960 9.784 0.0224 6.974 9.883 79.253 87.23 69.78 6.83 0.05 43.52 0.73

1020 9.479 0.0217 10.203 7.861 32.209 95.16 75.09 7.12 0.08 45.36 0.85 1080 10.523 0.0216 29.959 10.177 9.984 97.62 70.97 7.48 0.16 47.63 1.25 1150 14.590 0.0244 674.594 22.079 3.856 98.57 55.16 8.08 0.47 51.38 3.10 500 14.430 0.0199 214.342 21.383 5.798 99.99 55.94 8.09 0.34 51.45 2.31

5


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 413.540 0.3050 41.844 1370.74 1.819 0.30 2.04 8.46 6.42 53.69 47.22 600 28.271 0.0293 55.351 74.094 3.020 0.80 22.40 6.35 0.69 40.44 4.62 700 14.792 0.0171 7.757 25.157 9.908 2.43 49.45 7.32 0.22 46.60 1.58 770 13.045 0.0153 3.889 16.145 20.391 5.79 63.13 8.24 0.13 52.34 1.16 840 11.039 0.0129 0.486 4.282 165.012 32.96 88.21 9.74 0.04 61.70 0.98 880 8.996 0.0125 0.508 2.139 97.436 49.00 92.57 8.33 0.03 52.90 0.81 920 9.086 0.0128 0.859 3.333 43.165 56.11 88.74 8.07 0.04 51.26 0.81 960 9.337 0.0131 1.083 4.653 27.194 60.58 84.85 7.93 0.06 50.38 0.83

1000 9.444 0.0130 1.272 4.909 25.074 64.71 84.21 7.96 0.06 50.58 0.86 1070 9.021 0.0130 1.358 3.608 45.168 72.15 87.76 7.92 0.05 50.34 0.81 1150 8.505 0.0126 1.431 1.890 116.297 91.30 93.01 7.91 0.03 50.29 0.78 500 9.464 0.0128 7.009 3.931 52.845 99.99 87.34 8.27 0.05 52.52 0.85


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 63.618 0.1025 164.796 214.714 5.115 0.79 0.24 0.15 10.76 0.94 82.30 600 16.552 0.0385 37.910 40.685 16.123 3.26 27.11 4.50 0.76 27.90 5.95 700 7.679 0.0313 4.598 4.348 118.554 21.47 82.78 6.36 0.05 39.32 0.70 770 6.598 0.0310 1.257 0.714 199.124 52.05 96.22 6.35 0.04 39.27 0.65 840 6.923 0.0306 5.048 2.024 38.071 57.90 90.62 6.29 0.11 38.89 1.11 900 7.294 0.0301 7.513 3.050 31.926 62.80 86.90 6.36 0.15 39.31 1.34 960 7.007 0.0308 4.456 1.682 82.236 75.43 92.32 6.48 0.05 40.03 0.75

1050 6.686 0.0308 3.459 0.891 135.863 96.29 95.49 6.39 0.03 39.49 0.65 1150 7.336 0.0312 33.847 3.370 14.020 98.45 85.35 6.31 0.32 39.00 2.74 1350 8.479 0.0306 390.269 3.649 10.121 99.99 86.47 7.40 0.51 45.66 4.34 Total gas age: 38.92 ± 1.18 Ma Weighted mean age: 39.44 ± 0.63 Ma RJG9 Muscovite (6.0 mg; J = 0.003453)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 118.787 0.1014 15.401 376.015 1.224 0.21 6.40 7.64 2.06 47.00 13.40 600 30.171 0.0281 43.399 73.255 2.129 0.56 27.83 8.50 0.70 52.16 4.46 700 16.750 0.0167 1.532 22.069 7.126 1.76 60.49 10.20 0.21 62.42 1.62 770 14.750 0.0137 0.549 8.872 19.889 5.11 81.80 12.10 0.10 73.82 1.28 840 15.887 0.0130 0.085 3.107 124.551 26.05 93.96 14.94 0.05 90.73 1.39 880 14.179 0.0126 -0.173 0.539 87.661 40.78 98.55 13.99 0.04 85.09 1.29 920 13.056 0.0128 0.415 1.484 33.533 46.42 96.23 12.59 0.04 76.74 1.16 960 13.641 0.0125 -0.593 1.290 30.228 51.50 96.79 13.23 0.03 80.57 1.20

1000 14.250 0.0126 0.341 0.991 37.847 57.87 97.58 13.92 0.05 84.72 1.30 1070 15.284 0.0125 0.069 0.622 109.011 76.19 98.52 15.07 0.05 91.51 1.39 1150 14.688 0.0125 0.827 0.353 104.556 93.77 98.99 14.55 0.04 88.44 1.34

6

1350 15.008 0.0123 21.086 0.809 37.049 99.99 98.07 14.74 0.06 89.55 1.38 Total gas age: 86.76 ± 1.37 Ma Weighted mean age: 84.04 ± 2.05 Ma RJG1 Biotite (5.2 mg; J = 0.003469)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 68.121 0.1009 154.265 224.269 3.240 0.58 2.68 1.83 3.03 11.41 22.83 600 16.942 0.0471 48.816 37.733 9.449 2.28 33.85 5.76 0.26 35.71 1.73 700 9.081 0.0500 7.096 6.354 74.240 15.60 78.88 7.17 0.04 44.32 0.71 770 7.472 0.0490 2.468 0.965 187.822 49.31 95.67 7.15 0.02 44.22 0.68 840 7.647 0.0482 15.194 1.569 34.581 55.52 93.26 7.15 0.04 44.21 0.72 900 8.097 0.0472 28.267 3.183 17.876 58.72 87.54 7.13 0.08 44.05 0.85 960 8.002 0.0490 15.214 1.868 46.365 67.04 92.52 7.42 0.04 45.83 0.72

1050 7.593 0.0485 7.252 1.000 105.655 86.01 95.59 7.27 0.01 44.90 0.67 1150 7.663 0.0478 24.651 0.987 61.109 96.97 95.63 7.34 0.03 45.36 0.70 1350 8.695 0.0372 487.081 2.224 16.866 99.99 92.04 8.05 0.08 49.67 0.90 Total gas age: 44.45 ± 0.76 Ma Weighted mean age: 44.89 ± 0.74 Ma RJG1 Muscovite (6.7 mg; J = 0.003458)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 83.860 0.1006 163.821 249.798 2.471 0.36 11.92 10.03 1.91 61.50 13.40 600 13.241 0.0261 89.145 23.950 5.941 1.22 45.98 6.14 0.32 37.90 2.05 700 9.250 0.0197 74.580 10.357 17.044 3.69 66.35 6.16 0.11 38.05 0.88 770 7.752 0.0168 69.427 3.458 24.407 7.22 86.18 6.70 0.07 41.35 0.75 840 8.637 0.0146 60.823 3.779 40.051 13.03 86.59 7.49 0.04 46.15 0.74 880 11.319 0.0132 19.766 2.583 86.122 25.50 92.92 10.52 0.04 64.50 0.99 920 9.527 0.0128 13.176 0.839 99.491 39.91 97.00 9.25 0.03 56.79 0.87 960 8.507 0.0133 17.738 1.015 55.389 47.94 95.97 8.18 0.03 50.30 0.78

1000 8.412 0.0142 18.113 1.200 44.204 54.34 95.25 8.03 0.04 49.39 0.78 1070 8.921 0.0147 16.983 1.050 62.762 63.43 96.06 8.58 0.03 52.75 0.81 1150 9.999 0.0136 16.324 0.860 89.122 76.34 97.07 9.71 0.03 59.61 0.90 1350 9.758 0.0133 37.386 0.658 163.296 99.99 97.64 9.53 0.03 58.53 0.90 Total gas age: 55.40 ± 0.90 Ma Weighted mean age: 55.03 ± 1.98 Ma 03RJG15 Biotite (5.6 mg; J = 0.003462)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 72.894 0.1127 63.172 199.374 1.612 0.31 19.02 13.95 1.56 85.10 10.07 600 26.130 0.1140 26.568 41.678 4.586 1.18 52.43 13.78 0.35 84.10 2.56 700 22.930 0.1140 3.377 4.332 57.221 12.03 94.20 21.62 0.07 130.21 1.97 770 23.130 0.1115 1.317 0.757 131.083 36.90 98.80 22.87 0.08 137.50 2.07 840 23.497 0.1113 1.752 0.702 59.883 48.27 98.90 23.26 0.07 139.71 2.08 900 23.116 0.1102 3.733 1.316 26.218 53.24 98.06 22.70 0.08 136.46 2.07 960 21.894 0.1117 6.271 1.263 37.763 60.40 98.06 21.49 0.07 129.46 1.95

1050 21.704 0.1117 2.064 0.733 129.368 84.95 98.76 21.45 0.06 129.26 1.92 1150 22.658 0.1089 85.884 0.625 66.117 97.49 99.00 22.45 0.06 135.03 2.02 1350 19.879 0.0508 171.035 2.519 13.205 99.99 95.90 19.12 0.11 115.63 1.84

7

Total gas age: 132.84 ± 2.06 Ma Weighted mean age: 132.53 ± 2.98 Ma 03RJG15 Muscovite (6.0 mg; J = 0.003451)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 105.820 0.0875 90.115 250.925 1.646 0.29 29.79 31.65 1.28 187.02 8.60 600 12.920 0.0256 70.509 13.520 6.060 1.35 68.26 8.90 0.20 54.57 1.49 700 9.881 0.0274 32.540 4.292 16.502 4.23 86.49 8.58 0.08 52.67 0.95 770 11.355 0.0309 33.576 2.940 21.872 8.06 91.83 10.46 0.07 63.96 1.05 840 16.241 0.0199 34.315 4.418 35.549 14.27 91.67 14.91 0.03 90.51 1.34 880 20.066 0.0142 6.616 0.492 114.854 34.35 99.07 19.89 0.01 119.78 1.74 920 14.867 0.0151 9.154 0.788 38.011 40.99 98.10 14.60 0.05 88.71 1.34 960 15.170 0.0182 7.743 1.076 25.628 45.47 97.52 14.82 0.06 90.00 1.40

1000 16.981 0.0253 6.555 1.289 22.973 49.49 97.39 16.57 0.07 100.32 1.54 1070 18.804 0.0228 5.649 0.786 45.905 57.51 98.51 18.54 0.06 111.90 1.68 1150 18.062 0.0144 11.340 0.389 119.795 78.46 99.14 17.92 0.07 108.24 1.68 1350 16.164 0.0128 9.655 0.416 122.284 99.83 98.99 16.01 0.05 97.03 1.48 500 23.338 0.0191 8.366 19.495 0.954 99.99 72.90 17.54 1.12 106.07 6.89


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 290.601 0.2125 41.936 955.007 7.830 1.54 2.88 8.36 3.53 53.12 26.30 700 8.167 0.0291 1.481 7.108 259.616 52.55 73.85 6.03 0.04 38.46 0.63 770 6.874 0.0278 1.570 3.164 72.489 66.79 85.86 5.90 0.03 37.66 0.60 840 8.159 0.0267 4.388 6.932 26.451 71.99 74.39 6.08 0.08 38.74 0.79 900 7.636 0.0264 5.739 5.023 65.785 84.91 80.08 6.12 0.04 39.00 0.64 960 7.050 0.0254 7.056 3.477 45.723 93.89 84.88 5.99 0.05 38.19 0.65

1020 8.769 0.0214 22.696 8.649 12.374 96.33 70.33 6.18 0.13 39.40 1.03 1080 9.719 0.0263 97.936 11.908 10.168 98.32 63.36 6.17 0.18 39.35 1.29 1150 13.660 0.0248 457.742 24.092 5.107 99.33 47.69 6.54 0.34 41.66 2.29 500 33.663 0.0330 88.941 75.909 3.424 99.99 33.21 11.20 0.78 70.80 5.08


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 362.728 0.2724 37.926 1173.14 1.579 0.27 4.42 16.03 5.19 100.35 36.80 600 26.679 0.0210 30.643 62.471 2.701 0.75 30.60 8.19 0.75 51.94 4.91 700 20.213 0.0173 6.100 31.869 8.450 2.22 53.18 10.76 0.29 67.97 2.14 770 17.419 0.0140 2.027 10.300 20.186 5.73 82.28 14.34 0.11 90.02 1.51 840 19.321 0.0128 0.482 3.452 84.416 20.43 94.52 18.27 0.06 113.90 1.73 880 17.435 0.0123 0.354 1.607 95.966 37.15 97.06 16.93 0.06 105.78 1.60 920 14.794 0.0126 0.841 3.314 41.005 44.29 93.12 13.78 0.06 86.58 1.34 960 14.143 0.0126 0.836 3.038 40.870 51.41 93.38 13.21 0.06 83.09 1.29

1000 15.708 0.0127 1.176 2.748 46.361 59.48 94.58 14.86 0.06 93.20 1.44 1070 17.710 0.0123 0.607 1.506 101.056 77.08 97.28 17.23 0.06 107.63 1.65

8

1150 18.106 0.0121 1.510 1.237 112.588 96.69 97.78 17.71 0.06 110.51 1.69 1350 21.129 0.0149 14.146 13.249 19.003 99.99 81.27 17.18 0.14 107.32 1.83 Total gas age: 102.93 ± 1.66 Ma Weighted mean age: 99.43 ± 3.78 Ma RJG3 Biotite (4.6 mg; J = 0.003572)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 306.926 0.2872 139.687 1021.42 2.578 0.46 1.65 5.07 4.52 32.40 33.94 700 11.966 0.0575 8.274 15.943 86.689 15.86 60.33 7.22 0.07 45.94 0.84 770 8.138 0.0558 3.214 1.883 147.278 42.03 92.72 7.55 0.03 47.99 0.75 840 8.397 0.0558 6.625 2.743 50.671 51.03 89.89 7.55 0.04 48.03 0.77 900 8.628 0.0558 11.683 3.715 47.821 59.53 86.84 7.50 0.05 47.67 0.77 960 8.248 0.0545 12.508 2.978 66.248 71.30 88.89 7.33 0.03 46.66 0.73

1020 8.125 0.0551 18.180 2.671 59.480 81.87 89.83 7.30 0.04 46.46 0.73 1080 8.326 0.0552 40.221 2.886 52.544 91.21 89.33 7.44 0.04 47.33 0.75 1150 8.674 0.0571 629.830 3.473 37.606 97.89 88.20 7.66 0.04 48.70 0.78 1350 12.141 0.0386 205.181 12.906 11.869 99.99 68.31 8.31 0.17 52.76 1.36 Total gas age: 47.35 ± 0.84 Ma Weighted mean age: 47.47 ± 0.79 Ma 03RJG16 Biotite (5.7 mg; J = 0.003460)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 60.882 0.0402 19.712 113.790 14.322 3.45 44.68 27.23 0.41 162.42 3.49 600 13.357 0.0177 10.591 6.730 33.871 11.60 84.74 11.34 0.07 69.41 1.11 700 9.304 0.0162 0.971 0.850 169.617 52.41 96.88 9.02 0.03 55.45 0.85 770 9.153 0.0164 2.491 1.393 44.168 63.04 94.98 8.71 0.03 53.56 0.83 840 10.065 0.0166 4.384 2.931 33.699 71.15 90.88 9.17 0.05 56.34 0.89 900 8.913 0.0161 5.358 2.457 52.562 83.80 91.35 8.15 0.04 50.20 0.79 960 9.245 0.0160 6.449 0.751 53.988 96.79 97.11 8.99 0.03 55.27 0.85

1050 8.654 0.0163 158.198 3.720 5.198 98.04 85.71 7.54 0.23 46.44 1.57 1150 10.036 0.0173 653.354 3.441 5.574 99.39 88.94 9.04 0.21 55.59 1.55 1350 18.301 0.0164 512.098 7.288 2.552 99.99 86.95 16.16 0.43 98.18 3.08 Total gas age: 59.72 ± 0.98 Ma Weighted mean age: 55.18 ± 2.09 Ma 03RJG16 Muscovite (5.3 mg; J = 0.003450)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 323.519 0.2424 107.343 1041.40 0.331 0.08 4.84 15.76 13.36 95.54 93.75 600 36.367 0.0297 79.949 73.947 2.670 0.68 39.55 14.49 0.72 88.01 4.75 700 28.097 0.0168 14.327 22.557 9.243 2.77 75.95 21.40 0.21 128.51 2.30 770 26.989 0.0130 3.115 4.491 26.338 8.74 94.87 25.63 0.08 152.86 2.27 840 29.591 0.0127 0.904 1.366 115.285 34.87 98.45 29.15 0.09 172.90 2.57 880 27.798 0.0125 2.088 0.731 56.325 47.63 99.04 27.55 0.08 163.80 2.42 920 26.101 0.0126 4.136 1.256 27.979 53.97 98.36 25.70 0.09 153.24 2.32 960 25.952 0.0127 4.807 1.110 28.605 60.45 98.52 25.59 0.08 152.64 2.27

1000 27.364 0.0128 4.177 0.868 37.424 68.93 98.87 27.08 0.08 161.10 2.40 1070 29.492 0.0124 2.944 0.659 101.291 91.89 99.14 29.26 0.09 173.52 2.56 1150 29.499 0.0127 6.333 0.506 26.570 97.91 99.29 29.32 0.11 173.82 2.61

9

1350 28.473 0.0128 348.205 2.493 9.238 99.99 97.13 27.74 0.16 164.88 2.59 Total gas age: 165.55 ± 2.56 Ma Weighted mean age: 161.39 ± 3.86 Ma RJG4 Biotite (4.3 mg; J = 0.003573)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 227.887 0.1629 67.704 730.487 7.089 1.29 5.26 12.00 2.86 75.73 21.28 700 14.881 0.0225 2.857 7.845 251.142 46.85 84.18 12.53 0.06 79.01 1.24 770 13.244 0.0214 2.320 2.286 74.581 60.38 94.62 12.53 0.05 79.04 1.21 840 13.451 0.0217 4.058 4.263 33.951 66.54 90.35 12.16 0.06 76.71 1.20 900 12.519 0.0216 7.324 4.175 62.024 77.79 89.85 11.25 0.04 71.10 1.10 960 11.381 0.0210 6.771 2.277 79.400 92.20 93.77 10.67 0.04 67.53 1.04

1020 14.007 0.0215 14.921 3.010 34.049 98.38 93.38 13.08 0.06 82.43 1.29 1080 20.132 0.0257 160.870 26.660 3.581 99.03 60.60 12.23 0.50 77.17 3.38 1150 23.514 0.0289 323.443 37.918 2.727 99.52 52.15 12.30 0.61 77.59 4.06 500 41.044 0.0359 39.537 95.119 2.637 99.99 31.39 12.91 0.80 81.33 5.29


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 566.935 0.4817 127.865 1848.89 0.989 0.25 3.63 20.57 13.37 127.80 97.28 600 59.056 0.0387 136.559 138.685 1.802 0.70 30.51 18.05 1.39 112.65 9.64 700 39.819 0.0217 19.510 54.651 5.469 2.07 59.31 23.64 0.49 146.12 3.69 770 35.888 0.0169 9.569 26.389 11.928 5.06 78.14 28.06 0.24 172.18 2.94 840 34.242 0.0130 0.930 5.676 38.600 14.75 94.99 32.53 0.13 198.17 2.98 880 33.478 0.0128 0.524 4.478 76.406 33.91 95.93 32.12 0.13 195.81 2.97 920 33.367 0.0138 1.378 10.343 26.280 40.50 90.72 30.28 0.14 185.13 2.84 960 34.409 0.0144 1.661 14.769 18.074 45.03 87.19 30.01 0.17 183.58 2.89

1000 34.936 0.0146 1.338 14.147 18.971 49.79 87.91 30.72 0.15 187.71 2.87 1070 33.673 0.0135 1.734 7.201 42.510 60.45 93.57 31.51 0.12 192.28 2.90 1150 33.456 0.0125 2.407 2.643 126.639 92.22 97.55 32.64 0.11 198.82 2.95 1350 35.628 0.0147 20.351 12.390 31.027 99.99 89.62 31.93 0.15 194.73 2.99 Total gas age: 192.99 ± 3.05 Ma Weighted mean age: 191.85 ± 3.78 Ma RJG5 Biotite (5.6 mg; J = 0.003464)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 52.292 0.0864 123.310 157.026 5.048 0.80 11.18 5.87 2.46 36.31 18.43 600 26.119 0.0424 33.813 27.875 12.436 2.77 68.16 17.85 0.09 108.26 1.67 700 24.706 0.0399 4.099 5.679 43.898 9.72 93.00 23.00 0.09 138.28 2.11 770 24.752 0.0392 1.225 0.856 190.561 39.90 98.78 24.47 0.08 146.77 2.20 840 21.676 0.0383 4.519 1.240 33.032 45.13 98.04 21.28 0.06 128.30 1.92 900 19.104 0.0370 8.756 1.670 26.082 49.26 97.07 18.58 0.07 112.53 1.70 960 20.268 0.0387 5.412 0.871 79.498 61.85 98.49 19.98 0.07 120.73 1.82

1050 23.133 0.0394 4.819 0.710 177.729 89.99 98.87 22.89 0.07 137.67 2.06 1150 23.810 0.0393 65.024 0.963 40.117 96.35 98.60 23.50 0.07 141.19 2.11 1350 24.721 0.0398 346.302 1.415 23.064 99.99 98.14 24.30 0.11 145.84 2.25

10

Total gas age: 135.98 ± 2.13 Ma Weighted mean age: 130.15 ± 4.65 Ma

RJG5 Muscovite (5.4 mg; J = 0.003456)

T (°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 71.862 0.0777 91.646 197.837 3.192 0.53 18.56 13.38 3.67 81.54 27.29 600 29.740 0.0272 86.940 53.504 4.446 1.28 46.51 13.90 0.44 84.69 3.04 700 23.777 0.0213 40.602 26.545 11.891 3.27 66.72 15.90 0.23 96.54 1.98 770 23.145 0.0173 22.070 12.503 19.223 6.48 83.77 19.42 0.12 117.20 1.86 840 27.167 0.0143 9.985 6.239 50.590 14.95 93.03 25.29 0.10 151.20 2.29 880 27.993 0.0134 4.866 2.343 30.523 20.06 97.33 27.27 0.09 162.49 2.43 920 26.545 0.0131 4.918 1.467 34.609 25.85 98.17 26.08 0.09 155.71 2.33 960 24.540 0.0131 7.137 1.416 62.015 36.23 98.10 24.09 0.08 144.29 2.17

1000 24.043 0.0132 9.241 1.464 51.133 44.78 97.98 23.58 0.09 141.34 2.15 1070 24.915 0.0133 11.548 1.327 67.393 56.06 98.24 24.49 0.08 146.60 2.19 1150 26.781 0.0133 11.286 1.240 116.027 75.48 98.43 26.38 0.07 157.44 2.32 1350 27.715 0.0131 31.083 0.798 146.550 99.99 98.98 27.45 0.10 163.53 2.46 Total gas age: 151.21 ± 2.37 Ma Weighted mean age: 149.24 ± 4.63 Ma RJG6 Biotite (4.5 mg; J = 0.003574)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 225.912 0.1500 36.635 577.106 6.643 1.12 24.49 55.35 2.27 325.62 15.56 700 21.923 0.0324 1.666 6.287 289.016 49.78 91.36 20.03 0.10 124.74 1.96 770 18.673 0.0310 1.328 1.823 100.350 66.67 96.91 18.10 0.06 113.08 1.71 840 18.872 0.0312 2.695 4.000 35.459 72.64 93.53 17.66 0.07 110.39 1.69 900 17.441 0.0305 6.051 4.649 42.730 79.83 91.90 16.03 0.07 100.52 1.57 960 15.807 0.0307 5.699 3.370 55.147 89.12 93.46 14.78 0.05 92.85 1.42

1020 18.967 0.0312 6.936 2.403 50.749 97.66 96.06 18.22 0.06 113.82 1.73 1080 21.462 0.0329 73.257 11.149 8.109 99.03 84.41 18.14 0.23 113.32 2.24 1150 26.978 0.0340 304.508 28.109 3.473 99.61 69.00 18.66 0.51 116.49 3.67 500 50.371 0.0446 28.699 105.741 2.306 99.99 37.83 19.09 1.00 119.08 6.88


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 411.808 0.3776 10.559 1351.51 1.079 0.24 3.01 12.40 9.21 78.16 67.07 600 74.631 0.0513 10.616 194.898 2.294 0.76 22.76 17.00 1.32 106.33 9.02 700 44.673 0.0269 5.364 75.133 7.702 2.48 50.20 22.44 0.48 139.01 3.74 770 38.095 0.0186 1.661 32.349 21.537 7.30 74.80 28.50 0.22 174.82 2.94 840 34.997 0.0144 0.295 9.805 102.741 30.32 91.61 32.06 0.13 195.53 2.93 880 34.325 0.0136 0.461 6.890 41.523 39.62 93.96 32.25 0.13 196.62 2.96 920 33.552 0.0142 1.263 9.534 40.551 48.70 91.49 30.70 0.13 187.62 2.85 960 34.111 0.0148 1.036 12.273 28.309 55.04 89.25 30.45 0.13 186.17 2.84

1000 34.762 0.0146 1.116 11.238 29.583 61.67 90.33 31.41 0.15 191.72 2.94 1070 34.070 0.0134 1.079 5.781 62.125 75.58 94.87 32.33 0.14 197.05 3.01 1150 33.848 0.0130 1.824 4.296 39.451 84.42 96.14 32.54 0.13 198.30 3.01

11

1350 35.376 0.0137 6.730 6.621 69.568 99.99 94.36 33.39 0.15 203.15 3.11 Total gas age: 193.04 ± 3.05 Ma Weighted mean age: 192.91 ± 3.89 Ma RZG19 Biotite (4.8 mg; J = 0.003576)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 1177.79 0.9258 513.714 3938.03 0.903 0.21 1.20 14.11 51.46 88.80 387.06 700 37.916 0.1427 21.639 13.571 63.893 14.78 89.32 33.87 0.25 206.24 3.53 770 36.115 0.1482 3.655 1.285 131.952 44.88 98.83 35.70 0.15 216.73 3.27 840 36.439 0.1484 4.401 1.275 57.021 57.89 98.85 36.03 0.38 218.60 4.37 900 36.988 0.1462 26.719 2.802 27.421 64.15 97.65 36.13 0.13 219.18 3.26 960 37.229 0.1477 31.125 2.086 38.859 73.01 98.24 36.58 0.15 221.76 3.35

1020 36.857 0.1466 42.790 2.005 37.554 81.58 98.29 36.23 0.13 219.78 3.28 1080 36.602 0.1465 34.236 1.791 48.215 92.58 98.44 36.04 0.15 218.68 3.31 1150 36.073 0.1556 186.291 2.794 28.003 98.97 97.63 35.23 0.15 214.04 3.23 500 40.193 0.1580 463.763 27.176 4.519 99.99 79.90 32.17 0.52 196.43 4.38

Total gas age: 215.89 ± 3.64 Ma Weighted mean age: 217.57 ± 3.51 Ma QCG8 Biotite (4.5 mg; J = 0.003576)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 494.275 0.4794 146.254 1640.12 1.328 0.22 1.94 9.60 11.84 60.87 89.65 700 5.608 0.1459 3.412 6.582 150.289 25.69 64.70 3.63 0.03 23.26 0.40 770 3.874 0.1474 1.406 0.780 211.026 61.45 93.15 3.61 0.01 23.13 0.36 840 4.573 0.1465 10.747 3.113 31.854 66.85 79.07 3.62 0.05 23.20 0.48 900 4.694 0.1462 15.477 3.266 33.240 72.48 78.66 3.70 0.05 23.69 0.48 960 4.873 0.1422 18.039 3.560 32.470 77.98 77.66 3.79 0.05 24.27 0.49

1020 4.315 0.1478 9.452 2.135 63.055 88.66 84.55 3.65 0.03 23.39 0.40 1080 4.568 0.1465 22.459 3.004 43.137 95.97 79.79 3.65 0.05 23.38 0.47 1150 7.088 0.1511 293.860 10.099 13.192 98.21 57.61 4.09 0.12 26.19 0.87 500 13.395 0.1441 64.702 27.091 10.576 99.99 39.97 5.36 0.19 34.24 1.36


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 138.487 0.2476 266.398 454.142 0.867 0.19 3.07 4.28 4.19 26.41 28.26 600 19.347 0.1802 140.277 57.620 3.646 0.98 11.79 2.30 0.59 14.24 3.69 700 6.534 0.2782 10.384 9.043 39.484 9.57 58.49 3.83 0.06 23.66 0.52 770 4.098 0.2863 2.917 0.952 131.321 38.14 92.25 3.78 0.02 23.38 0.38 840 3.990 0.2874 9.623 0.617 47.163 48.41 94.34 3.78 0.03 23.33 0.40 900 4.161 0.2794 24.364 1.090 20.835 52.94 90.93 3.81 0.06 23.53 0.54 960 4.196 0.2814 30.208 1.031 30.219 59.51 91.62 3.86 0.04 23.86 0.45

1050 4.145 0.2884 9.526 1.054 107.681 82.94 91.60 3.80 0.02 23.49 0.37 1150 3.988 0.2898 119.141 0.630 72.099 98.63 94.57 3.78 0.02 23.35 0.38 1350 5.164 0.2601 203.113 3.843 6.298 99.99 76.38 4.01 0.23 24.79 1.46

12


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 729.167 0.6787 80.685 2424.06 1.214 0.26 1.76 12.83 15.54 80.91 116.12 700 7.447 0.2931 2.498 12.472 93.624 20.31 50.04 3.73 0.04 23.89 0.46 770 4.050 0.2961 0.706 1.080 174.053 57.60 91.25 3.70 0.01 23.69 0.37 840 4.852 0.2927 2.433 3.617 30.934 64.22 77.18 3.75 0.06 24.02 0.53 900 4.891 0.2939 2.694 3.713 31.931 71.06 76.79 3.76 0.05 24.09 0.47 960 4.908 0.2917 4.177 3.737 35.470 78.66 76.73 3.77 0.05 24.16 0.50

1020 4.862 0.2915 5.821 3.411 44.525 88.20 78.50 3.82 0.04 24.47 0.46 1080 5.432 0.2939 30.224 5.350 26.795 93.94 70.22 3.82 0.07 24.47 0.56 1150 6.455 0.3100 310.239 8.039 19.435 98.10 62.91 4.07 0.09 26.05 0.70 500 23.612 0.2147 347.516 35.679 8.877 99.99 55.26 13.06 0.30 82.35 2.31


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 112.172 0.2232 263.903 359.531 0.266 0.05 5.18 5.92 7.32 36.46 48.15 600 27.974 0.1691 210.030 85.219 2.138 0.46 9.83 2.78 1.06 17.20 6.80 700 7.330 0.2400 7.210 11.787 32.452 6.63 51.92 3.82 0.08 23.58 0.60 770 4.127 0.2459 1.439 0.841 168.388 38.67 93.11 3.85 0.02 23.77 0.37 840 4.026 0.2430 4.337 0.465 52.977 48.75 95.53 3.86 0.03 23.83 0.40 900 4.124 0.2411 14.755 0.593 26.911 53.87 94.50 3.92 0.06 24.21 0.50 960 4.078 0.2415 11.718 0.530 40.759 61.63 95.06 3.89 0.04 24.04 0.42

1050 4.042 0.2454 11.533 0.467 99.052 80.47 95.66 3.87 0.02 23.93 0.38 1150 4.047 0.2606 84.263 0.508 96.955 98.92 95.51 3.87 0.02 23.92 0.38 1350 5.491 0.3424 517.318 5.007 5.677 99.99 71.92 4.02 0.23 24.86 1.48 Total gas age: 23.86 ± 0.43 Ma Weighted mean age: 23.88 ± 0.38 Ma QCG4 Biotite (4.7 mg; J = 0.003576)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 559.533 0.5329 142.823 1864.04 1.240 0.21 1.55 8.69 10.10 55.18 75.80 700 13.493 0.2084 22.112 32.768 25.310 4.44 27.98 3.78 0.16 24.20 1.09 770 4.773 0.2168 1.860 3.162 136.901 27.33 79.68 3.80 0.02 24.38 0.39 840 4.170 0.2177 1.504 1.093 123.634 48.00 91.39 3.81 0.02 24.43 0.38 900 4.770 0.2160 6.178 2.882 37.847 54.33 81.35 3.88 0.05 24.88 0.48 960 5.108 0.2155 11.688 3.987 29.422 59.25 76.18 3.90 0.06 24.96 0.52

1020 4.712 0.2158 10.957 2.526 46.914 67.09 83.37 3.93 0.04 25.19 0.46 1080 4.428 0.2176 12.489 1.894 69.270 78.68 86.55 3.84 0.02 24.57 0.40 1150 4.311 0.2199 30.662 1.425 113.702 97.69 89.45 3.86 0.02 24.71 0.39 1350 11.225 0.2110 72.230 20.389 13.826 99.99 46.01 5.17 0.16 33.05 1.13

13

Total gas age: 24.86 ± 0.52 Ma Weighted mean age: 24.61 ± 0.42 Ma

03Taa01 Biotite (6.2 mg; J = 0.003446)

T (°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 209.586 0.2388 131.639 695.913 0.661 0.13 1.86 3.92 7.01 24.22 43.01600 16.758 0.1168 284.465 40.828 6.140 1.37 27.70 4.69 0.33 28.89 2.02700 4.937 0.1197 14.391 2.347 45.487 10.50 84.96 4.21 0.03 25.99 0.19770 4.469 0.1193 5.091 0.980 45.418 19.62 92.38 4.15 0.03 25.60 0.18840 4.667 0.1177 6.037 1.758 16.392 22.91 87.13 4.12 0.08 25.40 0.47900 4.798 0.1194 7.805 2.204 12.225 25.37 84.44 4.12 0.07 25.40 0.41960 4.594 0.1203 13.476 1.271 19.391 29.26 90.21 4.19 0.06 25.84 0.37

1050 4.335 0.1189 11.395 0.618 92.685 47.87 94.84 4.12 0.02 25.43 0.101150 4.214 0.1209 23.208 0.239 247.473 97.56 97.51 4.11 0.01 25.39 0.071350 5.010 0.1077 6.889 2.607 12.129 99.99 82.73 4.21 0.10 25.97 0.61Total gas age: 25.55 ± 0.46 Ma Weighted mean age: 25.48 ± 0.40 Ma Inverse isochron age: 25.42 ± 0.40 Ma 03Taa02 Biotite (5.5 mg; J = 0.003444)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 27.740 0.0817 55.992 86.119 3.816 0.58 8.12 2.26 0.61 14.01 3.75600 7.497 0.0375 329.017 16.279 6.954 1.64 35.39 2.68 0.21 16.58 1.32700 4.880 0.0497 58.406 5.488 14.197 3.80 65.68 3.23 0.10 19.96 0.62770 5.096 0.1446 15.272 3.606 11.232 5.51 77.73 4.00 0.14 24.67 0.87840 5.094 0.2584 13.428 3.004 17.232 8.14 81.45 4.17 0.07 25.75 0.41900 4.824 0.2862 7.668 1.495 24.839 11.92 89.77 4.35 0.06 26.83 0.34960 4.638 0.2943 8.029 1.169 28.643 16.29 91.49 4.26 0.05 26.28 0.28


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 30.488 0.1593 32.231 83.544 7.356 1.33 18.88 5.77 0.41 35.50 2.47600 14.134 0.1977 34.465 27.041 14.517 3.95 43.13 6.11 0.17 37.58 1.05700 6.954 0.2039 7.876 8.225 58.096 14.44 64.49 4.49 0.05 27.68 0.30770 4.920 0.2013 3.348 2.487 71.534 27.36 84.26 4.15 0.03 25.61 0.19840 4.622 0.1955 2.948 1.476 24.140 31.72 89.40 4.15 0.05 25.62 0.34900 4.827 0.1980 4.495 2.267 15.848 34.58 84.81 4.12 0.10 25.44 0.60960 4.811 0.1991 10.921 2.298 16.325 37.53 84.60 4.10 0.08 25.29 0.51

1050 4.664 0.1978 4.827 1.951 105.050 56.51 86.84 4.05 0.02 25.01 0.131150 4.191 0.1973 14.488 0.501 231.484 98.31 95.66 4.01 0.01 24.74 0.081350 5.088 0.1968 25.743 3.722 9.332 99.99 76.85 3.96 0.15 24.42 0.91

14

Total gas age: 25.76 ± 0.47 Ma Weighted mean age: 25.08 ± 0.50 Ma Inverse isochron age: 24.62 ± 0.42 Ma 03Taa04 Biotite (5.8 mg; J = 0.003442)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 30.224 0.1272 39.104 80.947 7.878 1.18 20.71 6.27 0.37 38.55 2.22600 13.662 0.1911 171.728 23.035 11.694 2.93 49.86 6.84 0.19 41.97 1.16700 8.042 0.2269 48.515 9.818 29.615 7.36 63.42 5.11 0.08 31.47 0.47770 5.694 0.2513 3.490 3.642 56.791 15.86 80.39 4.59 0.04 28.26 0.23840 4.846 0.2627 2.300 1.162 64.978 25.58 92.07 4.47 0.03 27.55 0.16900 4.718 0.2659 2.020 0.898 55.314 33.86 93.48 4.42 0.02 27.24 0.15960 4.831 0.2624 2.135 1.308 63.699 43.39 91.16 4.41 0.03 27.19 0.16


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 37.686 0.0959 71.071 112.432 2.864 0.42 11.72 4.44 5.82 27.33 35.58600 9.521 0.1090 220.149 12.357 6.057 1.31 61.00 5.86 0.60 36.00 3.66700 2.163 0.1713 119.338 0.425 96.688 15.51 92.92 2.01 0.35 12.46 2.15770 4.296 0.1155 3.153 0.475 109.364 31.58 95.88 4.12 0.02 25.42 0.13840 4.418 0.1193 6.733 0.974 31.841 36.25 92.45 4.10 0.07 25.26 0.42900 4.525 0.1194 13.592 1.440 16.773 38.72 89.34 4.07 0.13 25.08 0.77960 4.503 0.1209 25.516 1.375 17.558 41.30 89.76 4.07 0.12 25.07 0.72


T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 54.951 0.0844 82.689 170.726 4.176 0.54 8.11 4.48 13.93 27.57 85.15600 20.559 0.0559 103.046 51.942 6.661 1.41 25.05 5.19 3.00 31.91 18.27700 10.880 0.0510 81.593 21.375 21.875 4.24 41.54 4.54 0.45 27.95 2.77770 6.630 0.0500 6.268 7.597 42.436 9.75 65.43 4.35 0.14 26.82 0.88840 5.390 0.0487 4.574 3.257 42.289 15.23 81.20 4.40 0.11 27.08 0.67900 5.458 0.0477 4.760 2.787 30.121 19.14 83.83 4.60 0.16 28.34 0.95960 6.525 0.0460 4.563 3.723 25.251 22.42 82.17 5.39 0.21 33.17 1.30

1050 6.071 0.0468 3.612 3.086 65.025 30.85 84.24 5.13 0.08 31.55 0.491150 6.376 0.0465 3.198 3.451 100.863 43.94 83.37 5.32 0.06 32.75 0.351350 5.778 0.0452 9.893 0.742 432.191 99.99 95.60 5.53 0.02 33.99 0.15

15

Total gas age: 32.38 ± 1.15 Ma Weighted mean age: 33.13 ± 0.80 Ma Inverse isochron age: 34.10 ± 0.78 Ma 03Tsal4 Biotite (4.8 mg; J = 0.003441)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 47.634 0.1679 294.480 137.027 7.915 2.11 14.95 7.14 0.45 43.75 2.73600 22.141 0.1896 1332.32

651.243 14.254 5.91 31.90 7.08 0.26 43.43 1.55

700 11.464 0.2073 990.768 20.286 27.746 13.30 48.05 5.52 0.12 33.95 0.71770 6.893 0.2195 125.934 6.784 29.755 21.22 70.39 4.87 0.07 29.95 0.41840 6.129 0.2160 58.739 4.851 23.629 27.52 75.85 4.67 0.08 28.74 0.46900 6.658 0.2161 50.651 6.910 19.538 32.72 68.60 4.59 0.09 28.26 0.55960 6.839 0.2145 52.647 7.457 27.686 40.10 67.16 4.61 0.07 28.38 0.44

1050 7.297 0.2138 50.799 9.110 85.081 62.77 62.66 4.58 0.05 28.18 0.281150 5.168 0.2271 22.455 2.324 133.409 98.31 86.04 4.45 0.02 27.42 0.121350 6.195 0.2238 17.287 5.562 6.355 99.99 71.91 4.52 0.20 27.84 1.21Total gas age: 29.44 ± 0.62 Ma Weighted mean age: 28.00 ± 0.68 Ma Inverse isochron age: 27.01 ± 0.55 Ma 03Tsal6 Biotite (5.8 mg; J = 0.003439)

T

(°C)

40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar 37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol) (x 10-15)

Σ39Ar


500 55.657 0.1191 152.952 179.899 3.662 0.89 4.44 2.48 1.09 15.30 6.71600 19.329 0.0984 953.813 53.174 9.141 3.11 18.89 3.66 0.31 22.59 1.88700 9.037 0.0931 465.239 17.421 28.002 9.90 43.01 3.90 0.08 24.01 0.50770 5.467 0.0876 16.891 4.631 34.429 18.26 74.19 4.07 0.05 25.06 0.31840 5.240 0.0843 8.536 4.054 35.575 26.89 76.32 4.01 0.05 24.71 0.31900 5.791 0.0850 6.621 5.982 27.270 33.51 68.70 3.99 0.06 24.59 0.37960 5.880 0.0863 12.868 6.290 37.467 42.60 67.69 3.99 0.06 24.58 0.35

1050 6.934 0.0885 14.751 9.879 64.904 58.35 57.38 3.98 0.04 24.54 0.271150 4.444 0.0940 63.109 1.458 164.790 98.34 89.62 3.99 0.02 24.56 0.111350 5.120 0.0884 31.527 4.065 6.851 99.99 74.86 3.89 0.18 23.96 1.13Total gas age: 24.44 ± 0.52 Ma Weighted mean age: 24.59 ± 0.39 Ma Inverse isochron age: 24.69 ± 0.40 Ma

RJG7 K-feldspar (14.6 mg; J = 0.003478)

T (°C)

t (min) 40Ar/39Ar 38Ar/39Ar

37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol)

(x 10-15)Σ39Ar

%40Ar*

40Ar*/ 39ArK

±σ

(40/39)

Age (Ma)

±σ

(Age)

400 15 568.085 0.1940 36.933 612.700 0.595 0.04 67.98 387.01 9.39 1538.41 36.94 400 22 288.379 0.1532 27.496 575.604 0.248 0.06 40.61 118.26 8.45 621.55 46.56 450 15 736.184 0.0907 98.758 96.759 1.006 0.13 96.02 707.62 7.79 2239.96 27.60 450 22 62.972 0.0370 -21.437 109.795 0.885 0.19 47.83 30.49 1.69 181.85 10.77 500 15 120.107 0.0270 23.790 27.205 2.839 0.39 93.09 112.04 1.07 593.68 10.02 500 22 17.616 0.0187 12.126 26.261 3.477 0.63 55.14 9.82 0.34 60.61 2.35 550 15 49.446 0.0176 15.142 8.212 9.167 1.27 94.88 46.99 0.23 273.09 4.15 550 22 8.580 0.0152 14.936 11.143 8.063 1.84 60.65 5.26 0.16 32.68 1.11 600 15 22.901 0.0147 21.500 4.203 18.340 3.12 94.29 21.63 0.10 130.85 2.03

16

600 22 6.224 0.0137 19.788 5.132 17.091 4.32 74.64 4.68 0.08 29.10 0.66 650 15 11.478 0.0133 23.148 2.264 33.397 6.65 93.73 10.78 0.04 66.40 1.03 650 22 5.392 0.0135 21.978 3.800 23.215 8.28 78.17 4.24 0.05 26.40 0.51 700 15 6.613 0.0129 32.231 1.515 43.866 11.35 92.55 6.14 0.03 38.10 0.61 700 22 4.980 0.0132 33.712 2.286 38.656 14.05 85.53 4.28 0.04 26.63 0.47 750 15 6.056 0.0128 40.400 1.385 44.432 17.16 92.52 5.62 0.03 34.91 0.57 750 22 5.024 0.0129 38.465 1.891 43.712 20.22 88.01 4.44 0.03 27.62 0.45 800 15 5.515 0.0128 49.370 1.364 49.793 23.71 91.94 5.08 0.03 31.62 0.52 800 22 4.997 0.0127 51.806 1.743 47.319 27.02 88.86 4.45 0.03 27.73 0.47 825 16 5.060 0.0128 62.405 1.684 38.387 29.70 89.30 4.54 0.03 28.23 0.47 850 15 5.093 0.0129 70.706 1.507 40.288 32.52 90.42 4.62 0.03 28.76 0.49 875 15 5.215 0.0127 87.718 1.506 43.357 35.56 90.70 4.75 0.03 29.53 0.48 900 16 5.348 0.0128 95.692 1.501 47.112 38.85 90.99 4.88 0.03 30.36 0.49 925 15 5.512 0.0130 99.057 1.654 38.687 41.56 90.39 5.00 0.03 31.10 0.50 950 15 5.837 0.0127 91.431 1.621 42.006 44.50 91.10 5.33 0.03 33.16 0.54 975 16 6.315 0.0129 72.292 1.790 43.518 47.54 90.97 5.76 0.03 35.78 0.57

1000 15 7.014 0.0130 52.218 2.167 33.907 49.92 90.20 6.34 0.04 39.38 0.65 1025 15 8.416 0.0129 39.952 1.881 42.798 52.91 92.86 7.83 0.03 48.48 0.76 1050 16 10.084 0.0130 31.440 2.261 36.192 55.44 92.90 9.39 0.05 57.96 0.92 1075 15 11.766 0.0132 29.477 2.194 40.268 58.26 94.09 11.09 0.04 68.26 1.05 1100 16 12.744 0.0135 25.477 2.243 41.805 61.19 94.44 12.05 0.05 74.08 1.14 1100 25 14.816 0.0134 23.121 2.811 45.749 64.39 94.09 13.95 0.06 85.50 1.33 1100 45 16.591 0.0139 22.136 4.061 52.580 68.07 92.51 15.36 0.05 93.90 1.43 1100 90 17.768 0.0141 19.016 5.296 72.454 73.14 90.94 16.17 0.05 98.72 1.49 1100 180 20.520 0.0151 16.795 9.620 79.589 78.70 85.94 17.65 0.07 107.46 1.66 1200 16 20.792 0.0137 9.938 1.943 167.825 90.45 97.01 20.19 0.07 122.41 1.86 1240 15 22.882 0.0141 7.257 1.932 49.803 93.93 97.31 22.28 0.08 134.64 2.05 1280 15 23.264 0.0144 21.650 4.708 83.729 99.79 93.84 21.84 0.07 132.10 2.00 1350 17 114.948 0.0619 649.187 235.084 2.864 99.99 39.50 45.52 1.21 265.17 8.28 1550 15 7191.44 4.5702 5158.98 23469.7 0.119 99.99 3.56 257.51 674 1153.82 2745 Total gas age: 76.99 ± 1.40 Ma Weighted mean age: 43.68 ± 4.52 Ma RJG9 K-feldspar (14.0 mg; J = 0.003473)

T (°C)


37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol)

(x 10-15)Σ39Ar

%40Ar*

40Ar*/ 39ArK

±σ

(40/39)

Age (Ma)

±σ

(Age)

400 15 159.498 0.1094 75.657 344.849 4.973 0.64 36.07 57.57 1.56 328.86 10.77 400 20 50.053 0.0640 213.729 117.259 0.531 0.70 30.18 15.39 1.95 93.94 12.52 400 30 41.847 0.0497 65.030 98.916 0.560 0.77 29.46 12.59 1.97 77.21 12.45 400 45 34.552 0.0461 140.946 85.963 0.655 0.86 25.85 9.13 1.76 56.32 11.22 450 15 56.231 0.0384 100.826 31.336 1.364 1.03 82.95 46.95 0.93 272.52 6.93 450 20 12.795 0.0206 20.436 18.098 1.784 1.26 56.72 7.42 0.47 45.88 3.06 450 30 10.379 0.0200 49.259 14.140 2.092 1.53 58.13 6.17 0.47 38.26 2.97 450 45 8.620 0.0179 55.198 12.906 2.543 1.85 54.20 4.78 0.34 29.69 2.20 500 15 31.337 0.0238 37.524 8.688 4.878 2.47 91.41 28.74 0.26 171.65 3.02 500 20 5.415 0.0145 35.338 3.554 6.087 3.25 78.86 4.33 0.14 26.96 0.94 500 30 5.014 0.0141 26.903 2.856 7.008 4.15 81.41 4.14 0.14 25.75 0.97 500 45 4.838 0.0141 34.129 2.925 7.951 5.16 80.47 3.94 0.12 24.54 0.87 550 15 13.742 0.0171 44.051 4.228 11.008 6.57 90.40 12.46 0.10 76.46 1.32 550 20 4.624 0.0136 45.454 1.469 12.022 8.10 89.18 4.16 0.07 25.89 0.59 550 30 4.544 0.0127 39.851 1.031 12.579 9.71 91.84 4.21 0.07 26.19 0.60 550 45 4.575 0.0132 46.231 1.252 13.104 11.38 90.53 4.18 0.07 25.98 0.61

17

600 15 8.628 0.0155 67.503 2.167 14.480 13.23 91.90 7.96 0.07 49.20 0.87 600 20 4.662 0.0134 61.614 0.765 14.827 15.12 93.88 4.41 0.07 27.41 0.62 600 30 4.616 0.0129 66.119 0.844 15.157 17.06 93.34 4.34 0.06 26.99 0.57 600 45 4.734 0.0133 70.838 0.901 15.592 19.05 93.18 4.44 0.04 27.61 0.51 650 15 6.771 0.0141 105.762 1.472 15.558 21.04 92.78 6.31 0.07 39.13 0.73 650 20 4.713 0.0131 112.689 0.818 15.627 23.03 93.74 4.45 0.04 27.66 0.51 650 30 4.727 0.0130 112.375 0.571 16.392 25.13 95.32 4.54 0.07 28.20 0.62 650 45 4.812 0.0127 117.976 0.813 16.850 27.28 93.95 4.55 0.05 28.28 0.52 700 15 5.720 0.0138 162.002 1.129 14.524 29.13 93.27 5.37 0.05 33.32 0.58 700 22 4.819 0.0131 161.520 0.489 15.435 31.10 95.95 4.66 0.05 28.94 0.55 750 15 5.768 0.0135 201.454 1.223 21.084 33.80 93.07 5.39 0.04 33.47 0.56 750 22 4.977 0.0129 186.418 0.710 17.510 36.03 94.89 4.75 0.05 29.52 0.55 800 15 5.847 0.0134 227.667 1.255 19.397 38.51 93.01 5.46 0.05 33.91 0.61 800 22 5.183 0.0132 222.175 0.843 15.376 40.47 94.32 4.92 0.05 30.57 0.57 825 16 5.903 0.0142 239.363 1.452 11.785 41.98 91.85 5.46 0.08 33.90 0.69 850 15 6.291 0.0136 255.739 1.646 12.481 43.57 91.50 5.79 0.07 35.95 0.69 875 15 6.513 0.0138 244.757 1.750 14.010 45.36 91.37 5.98 0.07 37.11 0.73 900 16 6.534 0.0136 205.384 1.123 16.530 47.47 94.24 6.19 0.06 38.36 0.69 925 15 6.671 0.0133 155.368 0.933 18.726 49.86 95.19 6.38 0.04 39.52 0.65 950 15 6.861 0.0135 108.390 0.939 21.889 52.66 95.29 6.56 0.05 40.65 0.69 975 16 7.243 0.0140 92.584 1.028 21.915 55.46 95.16 6.91 0.05 42.81 0.71

1000 15 8.309 0.0140 74.822 1.044 18.821 57.86 95.66 7.97 0.06 49.28 0.83 1025 15 9.454 0.0146 69.876 1.405 17.964 60.15 95.04 9.01 0.07 55.60 0.94 1050 16 10.603 0.0155 65.228 1.595 18.423 62.50 95.05 10.11 0.07 62.23 1.05 1075 15 11.425 0.0156 69.963 1.868 17.180 64.70 94.69 10.85 0.07 66.71 1.10 1100 16 12.244 0.0156 69.475 2.049 18.660 67.08 94.63 11.61 0.08 71.33 1.18 1100 25 12.607 0.0161 77.110 2.319 19.751 69.60 94.17 11.90 0.08 73.04 1.20 1100 45 13.324 0.0162 80.588 2.550 23.554 72.61 94.00 12.54 0.06 76.94 1.20 1100 90 14.598 0.0172 81.580 3.339 29.448 76.37 92.95 13.59 0.09 83.18 1.42 1200 16 23.140 0.0210 74.209 4.686 62.300 84.33 93.87 21.73 0.10 131.27 2.05 1240 15 21.051 0.0203 59.739 5.052 46.286 90.24 92.73 19.53 0.10 118.40 1.89 1280 15 18.980 0.0196 82.371 6.282 48.548 96.44 90.03 17.10 0.09 104.08 1.67 1350 16 31.470 0.0398 361.533 35.312 9.285 97.62 66.72 21.04 0.34 127.23 3.00 1550 15 21.955 0.0245 132.351 31.884 18.619 99.99 56.92 12.51 0.20 76.75 1.78 Total gas age: 64.29 ± 1.15 Ma Weighted mean age: 42.14 ± 3.13 Ma RJG1 K-feldspar (15.1 mg; J = 0.003481)

T (°C)


37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol)

(x 10-15)Σ39Ar

%40Ar*

40Ar*/ 39ArK

±σ

(40/39)

Age (Ma)

±σ

(Age)

400 15 151.052 0.1094 130.832 364.206 1.325 0.08 28.64 43.41 1.95 253.87 14.20 400 20 48.520 0.0401 53.920 122.150 0.701 0.12 25.06 12.40 0.67 76.21 4.29 400 30 36.660 0.0245 34.749 89.684 0.492 0.15 26.65 10.13 0.49 62.51 3.33 400 45 29.622 0.0296 79.404 68.867 0.513 0.18 29.91 9.25 0.91 57.14 5.69 450 15 36.470 0.0270 64.686 19.045 1.049 0.24 83.06 30.82 0.29 183.82 3.37 450 20 9.058 0.0146 51.667 10.906 1.479 0.33 61.09 5.81 0.23 36.10 1.59 450 30 7.968 0.0137 10.162 9.607 1.818 0.44 61.18 5.10 0.23 31.72 1.53 450 45 7.717 0.0135 5.053 8.874 2.310 0.58 63.26 5.06 0.17 31.51 1.26 500 15 11.025 0.0150 15.030 3.318 4.503 0.85 89.63 10.01 0.06 61.80 1.00

500 20 4.398 0.1854 1776.96 89.754 5.921 1.20 -

488.14 -22.04 8.54 0.00 0.00 500 30 4.825 0.0121 11.388 2.026 7.187 1.63 85.31 4.19 0.08 26.15 0.64 500 45 4.990 0.0132 16.959 2.359 8.417 2.14 84.08 4.26 0.03 26.57 0.45

18

550 15 6.401 0.0130 19.772 1.285 11.963 2.85 92.78 5.99 0.02 37.23 0.57 550 20 4.766 0.0127 20.040 1.004 13.797 3.68 92.20 4.44 0.02 27.66 0.44 550 30 4.835 0.0125 18.781 0.829 15.291 4.59 93.45 4.56 0.02 28.40 0.45 550 45 4.946 0.0130 17.944 0.995 17.270 5.62 92.70 4.62 0.02 28.78 0.46 600 15 5.620 0.0125 21.238 0.681 20.839 6.87 95.33 5.39 0.02 33.52 0.52 600 20 4.802 0.0125 18.118 0.582 23.206 8.26 95.20 4.60 0.02 28.65 0.45 600 30 4.856 0.0123 17.432 0.676 26.036 9.81 94.74 4.62 0.02 28.81 0.45 600 45 4.895 0.0124 13.345 0.697 29.575 11.58 94.71 4.66 0.02 29.01 0.48 650 15 5.122 0.0125 19.271 0.579 31.444 13.46 95.66 4.92 0.03 30.63 0.49 650 20 4.915 0.0124 18.702 0.413 33.769 15.48 96.49 4.76 0.02 29.65 0.46 650 30 4.982 0.0123 17.982 0.457 36.724 17.68 96.31 4.82 0.03 29.99 0.51 650 45 5.039 0.0124 17.891 0.547 39.786 20.06 95.86 4.85 0.02 30.18 0.49 700 15 5.122 0.0123 21.804 0.370 35.729 22.19 96.91 4.98 0.02 31.01 0.49 700 22 5.031 0.0125 21.767 0.323 40.380 24.61 97.17 4.90 0.02 30.54 0.47 750 15 5.205 0.0124 27.793 0.329 57.006 28.02 97.33 5.08 0.02 31.61 0.49 750 22 5.169 0.0125 25.964 0.352 51.921 31.12 97.16 5.03 0.02 31.34 0.49 800 15 5.248 0.0123 34.599 0.342 58.563 34.62 97.29 5.12 0.02 31.85 0.50 800 22 5.310 0.0122 32.312 0.318 49.780 37.60 97.42 5.19 0.02 32.27 0.50 825 15 5.407 0.0124 32.023 0.383 37.704 39.85 97.04 5.26 0.02 32.75 0.51 850 15 5.535 0.0123 34.635 0.433 38.798 42.17 96.85 5.38 0.03 33.45 0.54 875 15 5.619 0.0125 30.433 0.405 41.296 44.64 97.06 5.47 0.02 34.02 0.52 900 15 5.714 0.0122 25.121 0.404 45.031 47.34 97.12 5.56 0.02 34.61 0.55 925 15 5.835 0.0124 21.182 0.400 42.423 49.87 97.18 5.69 0.02 35.35 0.56 950 15 5.966 0.0124 18.280 0.325 40.468 52.29 97.60 5.84 0.02 36.30 0.57 975 15 6.136 0.0124 15.473 0.384 38.222 54.58 97.36 5.99 0.02 37.23 0.58

1000 15 6.702 0.0127 13.277 0.422 32.412 56.52 97.37 6.55 0.03 40.64 0.65 1025 15 6.828 0.0130 17.454 0.646 29.911 58.31 96.43 6.61 0.03 41.01 0.66 1050 15 7.008 0.0127 17.277 0.646 31.282 60.18 96.54 6.79 0.03 42.11 0.66 1075 15 7.765 0.0130 16.926 0.657 31.223 62.04 96.83 7.54 0.03 46.73 0.75 1100 15 7.802 0.0130 18.939 0.555 36.054 64.20 97.27 7.61 0.03 47.15 0.75 1100 25 7.879 0.0129 16.607 0.554 39.430 66.56 97.32 7.68 0.02 47.62 0.73 1100 45 8.350 0.0131 17.445 0.636 53.011 69.73 97.23 8.13 0.03 50.35 0.79 1100 90 8.796 0.0131 16.300 0.703 67.634 73.77 97.17 8.56 0.04 52.95 0.85 1200 15 9.310 0.0134 33.879 0.483 39.535 76.13 97.97 9.14 0.04 56.48 0.90 1240 15 7.556 0.0130 9.286 0.309 115.659 83.05 98.29 7.43 0.02 46.08 0.70 1280 15 6.920 0.0127 3.365 0.310 116.130 90.00 98.12 6.80 0.02 42.18 0.65 1350 15 8.069 0.0125 4.212 0.376 150.412 98.99 98.17 7.93 0.03 49.09 0.78 1550 15 82.264 0.0173 5.910 12.000 16.904 99.99 95.58 78.69 0.28 436.71 6.12 Total gas age: 43.09 ± 0.76 Ma Weighted mean age: 34.56 ± 1.44 Ma 03RJG15 K-feldspar (16.1 mg; J = 0.003471)

T (°C)


37Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

36Ar/39Ar (x 10-3)

39Ar (mol)

(x 10-15)Σ39Ar

%40Ar*

40Ar*/ 39ArK

±σ

(40/39)

Age (Ma)

±σ

(Age)

400 15 385.884 0.1858 95.839 740.016 1.054 0.06 43.26 167.20 2.28 825.58 14.86 400 22 117.551 0.0701 16.254 238.568 0.674 0.10 39.70 47.02 2.72 272.74 16.54 450 15 58.161 0.0257 12.480 42.820 1.621 0.19 77.69 45.48 0.72 264.40 6.00 450 22 21.681 0.0217 18.650 31.464 2.171 0.31 56.24 12.35 0.25 75.73 1.90 500 15 13.106 0.0161 9.083 13.426 6.923 0.69 69.02 9.11 0.09 56.14 1.06 500 22 8.736 0.0155 7.150 10.671 8.022 1.14 62.99 5.55 0.19 34.42 1.27 550 15 7.760 0.0133 10.224 2.801 18.472 2.16 88.55 6.90 0.07 42.70 0.77 550 22 6.027 0.0134 14.819 3.291 17.761 3.15 82.87 5.02 0.07 31.18 0.63

19

600 15 7.004 0.0134 18.037 1.877 32.272 4.94 91.39 6.42 0.04 39.75 0.64 600 22 5.666 0.0130 12.370 1.934 29.547 6.58 89.03 5.06 0.04 31.43 0.54 650 15 7.178 0.0129 11.164 1.200 47.078 9.20 94.45 6.79 0.03 42.03 0.66 650 22 5.643 0.0127 8.762 1.403 41.076 11.48 91.84 5.20 0.03 32.25 0.52 700 15 5.982 0.0126 11.822 0.858 57.450 14.67 95.06 5.70 0.03 35.33 0.56 700 22 5.736 0.0128 12.181 1.140 49.247 17.41 93.37 5.37 0.03 33.30 0.53 750 15 6.041 0.0126 17.222 0.879 58.513 20.66 95.02 5.75 0.02 35.65 0.56 750 22 6.086 0.0127 18.510 1.226 47.922 23.32 93.34 5.69 0.03 35.29 0.57 800 15 6.263 0.0128 29.870 0.972 51.719 26.20 94.75 5.95 0.03 36.85 0.58 800 22 6.233 0.0125 31.697 1.384 41.697 28.51 92.74 5.79 0.01 35.92 0.54 825 15 6.704 0.0125 37.918 1.464 29.304 30.14 92.82 6.24 0.04 38.67 0.64 850 15 6.699 0.0129 43.898 1.275 32.105 31.92 93.68 6.29 0.03 38.98 0.63 875 15 7.067 0.0127 47.854 1.250 35.750 33.91 94.14 6.67 0.04 41.28 0.67 900 16 8.075 0.0128 50.595 1.026 47.692 36.56 95.74 7.74 0.03 47.84 0.74 925 15 9.338 0.0128 43.926 0.959 47.802 39.21 96.52 9.03 0.04 55.65 0.89 950 15 9.583 0.0126 34.760 0.905 49.919 41.99 96.77 9.29 0.03 57.22 0.89 975 16 10.200 0.0128 25.239 0.988 50.360 44.79 96.72 9.88 0.04 60.81 0.95

1000 15 11.594 0.0130 15.098 1.051 43.445 47.20 96.93 11.25 0.04 69.12 1.07 1025 15 13.287 0.0129 9.667 1.252 40.530 49.45 96.86 12.89 0.05 78.93 1.22 1050 16 13.556 0.0132 9.256 1.131 44.021 51.90 97.20 13.19 0.04 80.75 1.24 1075 15 13.736 0.0131 10.437 1.131 45.898 54.45 97.24 13.37 0.05 81.83 1.26 1100 16 13.269 0.0128 11.607 1.550 35.385 56.41 96.18 12.78 0.05 78.29 1.21 1100 25 13.358 0.0132 13.863 2.080 39.739 58.62 95.05 12.71 0.05 77.89 1.20 1100 45 13.030 0.0132 13.969 2.873 49.158 61.35 93.15 12.15 0.04 74.51 1.14 1100 90 13.042 0.0134 14.994 3.969 63.525 64.88 90.70 11.84 0.04 72.64 1.11 1100 180 13.972 0.0139 14.048 6.232 72.751 68.92 86.54 12.10 0.05 74.21 1.15 1200 16 20.235 0.0132 24.738 1.458 46.126 71.48 97.65 19.77 0.06 119.75 1.81 1240 15 15.838 0.0129 9.721 1.001 59.673 74.80 97.87 15.51 0.05 94.60 1.44 1280 15 13.124 0.0126 4.537 0.790 285.754 90.67 97.91 12.86 0.04 78.77 1.19 1350 18 10.488 0.0126 6.303 1.446 161.571 99.65 95.57 10.03 0.03 61.73 0.95 1550 15 58.979 0.0405 47.907 118.899 6.304 99.99 40.31 23.82 0.47 143.28 3.64 Total gas age: 62.67 ± 1.00 Ma Weighted mean age: 47.60 ± 3.08 Ma

aSamples were irradiated for 15 hours in the Ford nuclear reactor at the University of Michigan. J factors have been calculated using Fish Canyon sanidine (27.8 Ma) [Renne et al., 1994] as a flux monitor. Isotopic ratios have been corrected for mass spectrometer backgrounds (mean values in mol: m/e 40 = 1.7 x 10-16 to 3.5 x 10-16; m/e 39 = 2.4 x 10-17 to 4.6 x 10-17; m/e 38 = 6.1 x 10-18 to 1.5 x 10-17; m/e 37 = 1.8 x 10-17 to 3.5 x 10-17; m/e 36 = 9.9 x 10-18 to 2.4 x 10-17), static line blank, mass discrimination (measured 40Ar/36Ar = 295.3 ± 0.5), abundance sensitivity (5 ppm), and radioactive decay. Age calculations include corrections for atmospheric argon and nucleogenic interferences (40Ar/39ArK = 0.0328; 36Ar/37ArCa = 0.00028; 39Ar/37ArCa = 0.00073). Whereas the age uncertainties for individual analyses (far right column) include analytical errors only, the weighted-mean age uncertainties for each sample (reported here and in the text) include these errors and additional errors in J factors and irradiation parameters.

20

Fission Track Results Table A3. Fission track data

Sample Elev.

(m) Number

of Grains

Std. Track

Density x

106/cm2

Track Count

Fossil Track

Density x

106/cm2

Track Count

Induced Track

Density x

106/cm2

Track Count

Fission Track Age

Mean Track Length (μm)

Standard Deviation

(μm)

Illampu RJG6 5363 25 3.608 4131 0.512 372 5.781 4199 18.2 ± 1.1 13.77 ± 0.23 2.1 RJG5 5020 8 2.813 4081 0.078 10 1.112 143 11.2 ± 3.7 12.71 ± 0.08 0.08 RJG4 4714 21 2.831 4081 0.165 42 2.570 653 10.4 ± 1.7 13.09 ± 0.51 1.71 03RJG16 4612 25 2.758 4081 0.350 186 3.824 2034 14.3 ± 1.2 12.52 ± 0.16 1.79 Yani RJG3 4335 25 3.597 4131 0.233 117 2.663 1336 17.9 ± 1.8 11.83 ± 0.28 2.12 RJG2 4074 25 2.850 4081 0.244 150 3.822 2353 10.3 ± 0.9 13.75 ± 0.16 1.51 03RJG15 3976 24 2.776 4081 0.230 132 2.353 1351 15.4 ± 1.5 13.34 ± 0.19 2.06 RJG1 3805 25 3.587 4131 0.222 183 2.801 2305 16.2 ± 1.3 13.00 ± 0.23 2.05 RJG9 3414 24 2.795 4081 0.121 157 1.925 2490 10.0 ± 0.9 13.38 ± 0.17 1.76 RJG8 3343 23 3.569 4117 0.172 146 3.312 2811 10.5 ± 0.9 13.20 ± 0.28 1.95 RJG7 3042 25 3.618 4131 0.149 181 3.569 4345 8.6 ± 0.7 14.06 ± 0.20 1.72 Huayna Potosí RZG19 (apatite) 5400 25 3.422 4075 0.598 433 7.126 5163 16.3 ± 1.0 13.90 ± 0.19 2.11 RZG19 (zircon) 5400 13 0.768 4065 11.959 597 4.868 243 151.0 ± 12.0 Quimsa Cruz QCG4 5108 6 3.628 4131 0.831 50 10.588 637 16.2 ± 2.4 13.35 ± 0.22 2.19 QCG5 4830 14 2.740 4081 0.752 169 7.537 1693 15.5 ± 1.3 13.61 ± 0.23 2.59 QCG6 4438 25 2.721 4081 0.234 161 6.259 4314 5.8 ± 0.5 13.19 ± 0.24 2.66 QCG7 3900 24 2.703 4081 0.267 166 6.052 3769 6.8 ± 0.6 13.75 ± 0.26 2.29

21

Sandstone Compositional Data Table A4. Recalculated modal point-count data for sandstones Q-F-L % Qm-F-Lt % Lv-Lm-Ls %

Sample m levela Q F L Qm F Lt Lv Lm Ls

Luribay Formation 1 LBY1-1 22.3 82 7 11 74 7 19 24 10 66 2 LBY1-2 28.0 87 6 7 75 7 18 20 13 67 3 LBY1-3 36.8 84 11 5 80 8 12 55 15 30 4 LBY1-4 43.5 87 11 2 73 11 16 22 67 11 5 LBY1-5 55.3 89 9 2 76 9 15 71 29 0 6 LBY1-6 74.9 87 10 3 74 10 16 29 57 14

Average 86 9 5 75 9 16 37 32 31 Standard Deviation 3 2 4 2 2 3 21 24 29

Salla Formation 1 SAL1-1 83.9 86 12 2 77 12 11 14 72 14 2 SAL1-2 93.8 86 13 1 73 13 14 0 75 25 3 SAL1-3 116.0 78 12 10 72 12 16 62 32 6 4 SAL1-4 165.3 37 22 41 34 22 44 94 3 3 5 SAL1-5 179.5 27 28 45 21 29 50 85 11 4

Average 63 17 20 56 17 27 51 38 11 Standard Deviation 28 7 21 26 7 19 42 34 9

aStratigraphic levels are relative to the base of measured section (base of Luribay Formation). Section base: UTM N0646257, W8103643. Section top: UTM N0645051, W8103784.

Date post:	06-Mar-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	trankiet
View:	212 times
Download:	0 times

Thermochronology, geochronology, and upper crustal ... · PDF fileStructural Geology [9] Three...

Documents