Thomas Caggiano Published under Freedom of the Press7086 Arcadia Glen Court http://thomascaggiano.com/140727hansbury.pdfNorth Las Vegas, NV 89084Pro SeJul 27, 2014

Morris County Superior CourtCopy for Hon. Stephen C. Hansbury Chambers and Clerk for filingP.O. Box 910Morristown, N.J. 07963-0910

Mc Connell, Lenard and Campbell (MLC)Office of Sussex County Counsel

4 Waterloo RoadP.O. Box 887Newton, N.J 07860

Kelly, Ward LLC93 Spring St.P.O. Box 887Newton, N.J., 07860

____________________________________________________________________SUSSEX COUNTY | SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEYBOARD of CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, | CHANCERY DIVISION: GENERAL EQUITYSUSSEX COUNTY COUNSEL MC CONNELL | PART - SUSSEX COUNTYSUSSEX COUNTY SHERIFF STRADA, |BOARD of CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS’ CLERK | Consolidated Docket No. SSX-C-43-13ELAINE MORGAN | No. SSX-C-01-13

Plaintiffs |vs. | Civil Action

|THOMAS CAGGIANO, | Disqualify Hon. S. Hansbury, P.J.Ch

Defendant. | per R. 1-12:1(g)||||

TOWNSHIP OF GREEN ||

vs. ||

THOMAS CAGGIANO, ||

Defendant. |_________________________________________|_____________________________________

1. Please accept this letter brief in lieu of a more formal brief.

TAKE NOTICE OF LAW, ADJUDICATIVE FACTS AND LEGISLATIVE INTENT

2. Prolog:

As stated by President Harry Truman as published on thomascaggiano.com and filed in Courts:

Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice ofopposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of in-creasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to allits citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.Harry S Truman, August 8, 1950 33rd president of US (1884 - 1972)

3. Previous NOTICE of this proposed motion WAS provided the court and plaintiffs. I adopt my filed 7page Notice published on http://thomascaggiano.com/140706noticedisqualify.pdf as part of this re-cord and my complaint for violation of Codes of Ethics against Judges Weisenbeck, A.J.S.C. ads Hans-bury, P.J.Ch filed to the State of New Jersey’s Supreme Court’s ACJC published on http://thomascag-giano.com/acjchansbury.pdf to also support this request for disqualification and others filed with theACJC published on http://thomascaggiano.com/corruptjudges.pdf thereon. This letter brief and pro-posed motion motion for the disqualification of Hon. S. Hansbury, P.J.Ch have been served the plain-tiffs attorneys by certified mail return receipt ads provided the ACJC fro reconsideration by the ACJCto conduct an investigations ads contact witnesses noted herein as the ACJC in a repeated pattern ofconduct designed to aide attorneys and judges has in my opinion violated Rules of Professional Con-duct 8.3.a, 8.3.b and file deceptive filings with the ACJC court. system.

4. Foe similar reasons as great discredit the integrity of the judiciary has occurred for after Judge E.Gannon. J.S.C. found NO harm and issued NO temporary restraints against Thomas Caggiano a hear-ing was conduct before Judge Thomas Weisenbeck. A.J.S.C. and said video is published on http://tho-mascaggiano.com/videoweisenbeck.asf. In addition, audio recordings of prior Open Public Meeting inthe Sussex County Board of Chosen Freeholders and note that over 21 pounds of relevant materialswere provided to the Board, that proves beyond any reasonable doubt a criminal conspiracy in fact con-tinues with nor threats by a law firm NOT the Office of Sussex County Council that is filled with false-hoods and statement that emails will be destroyed. As the plaintiff are Government officials such de-struction is a stated destruction of government records which per U.S. Constitution and NJ Constitu-tional ow grievances to be provided its County officials. The audio recording and other audio record-ings have been provided the court as well as CDS of evidence.

5. Whereas based upon my own knowledge Superior Court Sussex County staff, Municipal Court ad-ministrators and deputy municipal court administrators have reported the apparently corruption withinthe vicinage to the FBI, State Police and Township Administer and Municipal clerk have reported thecorruption within Sussex County to the FBI and State Police Official Corruption Bureau and FieldCDR-2 under oath field by Thomas Caggiano and Kathryn Caggiano who have been retaliated againstfor over 10 years with others have reported Mayors, Government Attorneys, and other state and munic-ipal officials and employees to the FBI, State Police and other agencies. The conduct of the Morris

County Superior Court has also as directed to Thomas Caggiano by the FBI in Newark, NJ has been re-ported to the local Morristown Bureau of Police and Morris County Prosecutor and Department of Lawand Public Safety of Law and Public Safety per NJSA 2:2-1 and 18 USC § 4 requirements.

6. The evidence disc is shown below and the audio recordings is published as known to the court in pri-or filings.

7. Despite multiple attempts via motions to remove unconstitutional court orders to the court, they re-main. The State of NJ Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (ACJC) which in my opinion whichprotects judges through out New Jersey has as its corrupt executive director Glenn Grant, J.A.D. whoalso ignored complaints against the Township of Green’s’ court administrator as well as a series of Vi-cinage trial court administrators who violated her own Codes of Ethics by writing me a letter NO de-

fendant per State Law has a right to obtain copies of their own court records. As noted in the court vid-eo of Apr 4, 2013 I requested a conference to discuss relevant issues and other oral argument for over15 months in papers NO such conference or argument has been held despite repeated requests.

8. The court has accepted filings by the attorney for the Township of Green to me as such emails areNOT accepted as proof of service and recently the court has stated they refuse to accepted emails fromattorneys. The Office of Sussex County Counsel uses a private email domain for receipt of “the firm”and for the Office of Council and stated the “firm” will destroy emails sent to this address using by theBoard of Chosen Freeholders ass a Government email address thereby violating record retention laws,due process, et. al. and not permitting discovery of such govt records by OPRA nor Common Lawrights of access violating of case Laws noted below as requests for sanctions have been requested by vi-olations of Rules of Professional Conduct to the court and referrals to the Morris County / Sussexcounty District Ethics Committee, the OAE and Supreme Court documented in hundreds of court re-cords and on the published letter to the Supreme Court and Department of Justice Public CorruptionUnit published on http://thomascaggiano.com/acjcglenngrant.pdf and to the State of NJ Department ofAgriculture’s Sussex County Soil Conservation District, Dolan and Dolan PA, FBI in Las Vegas, NV,Newark, NJ,Woodland Park, NJ and Trenton field office, Hamilton, NJ and DOJ Office of InspectorGeneral dated Feb 13, 2014 has resulted in only additional corruption and prevention of my reportingof federal crimes to the FBI Las Vegas and the West Va operators. On Jul 23, 2014, I reported the im-proper actions of operator 9104 to the FBI Public Access Line operator 7009 and has had a very longdiscussion of improper conduct of the DOJ and FBI referring her to the U.S. Attorney General Counciland the Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ Department of Justice. FOIA requests have now beensent to the CIGIE and FBI and the federal government agencies per Federal law have requested addi-tional time to obtain these records for years of witnesses referrals to them and note requests were madeby three federal senators and two members of congress and court staff in Sussex County ? MorrisCounty vicinage to the FBI as have others. AS the Code of Ethics has brought into question the integ-rity of the judiciary branch by actions that have continued for in act years by the township of Green,Borough of Stanhope’, Hopatcong, Wantage, Stillwater municipal courts and where as several SuperiorCourt Judges in Sussex County have recused themselves as have other municipal Judges in many mu-nicipalities, I request the recusal of Hon. S. Hansbury, P.J.Ch from Docket SSX-C-1-13 and SSX-C-43-13 and Judge Thomas Manahan, P.J.S.C. who has issued directives to the Court staff willfully prevent-ing me by even denying the civil right of contacting its court staff for any reason on procedure, filingfees, transcript fees fees, et. al. as Judge Thomas Manahan, P.J.S.C. issued court orders against bothThomas Caggiano and Kathryn Caggiano ( which he misspelled Katherine Caggiano) in violation of R7:2-1 ordering all municipal Judges in the Morris County / Sussex County Vicinage none could haveany Probable Cause hearing on any Probable Cause submittal under oath by either of us as he also didunder his own court order under IND 08-09-316-I State of N v. Thomas Caggiano which was even dis-missed with prejudice against the State of NJ and even that was done by fraud by the court for after Isubmitted such a motion Pro Se the court wrote a false court order with false findings that a motionwas made by the corrupt Sussex County prosecutors’ office but per a response to my OPRA request tothe Sussex County Prosecutor David Weaver his office confirmed NO such motion by the Prosecutors’Office was made.

9. The statements and conclusions made herein are my opinion and published under the Freedom ofthe Press to expose government fraud, violations of Codes of Ethics, rules governing courts at all levelsin a continuing repeated pattern in structure enterprise in agreed upon criminal conduct is a conspiracywith violation of RICO laws with tort act violations of outrage, breech of duty and causing emotionaldistress and physical bodily harm numerous times requiring hospitalization from the Borough of Stan-hope’s Police Station by ambulance, the Sussex County jail in police cars to Newton Memorial Hospi-

tal and chained to its beds with IVs caused by the Sheriff’s Office not providing me access to my asth-ma rescue inhaler and other prescribed drugs for 80 days of an illegal imprisonment by the Township ofGreen’s corrupt office of municipal prosecutor and court magistrate in violation of court rules as quasi-criminal charges field by more then a dozen officials and employees in the Borough of Stanhope leadby its perjurer Mayor Diana Kuncken, Borough and Office of Municipal prosecutor Richard A. Stein,Esq. of Laddey, Clark and Ryan, LLC with court magistrate John Mulhern, J.M.C who with Stein’s lawpartner Andrew Fraizer, Esq. in the Joint municipal court of Stilwlater and Hampton with the same Bor-ough of Stanhope magistrate John Mulhern, J.M.C. and the attorney for the Sussex County Soil Conser-vation District Brian Smith, Esq. retaliated against Mary Pawar, 12 East Drive, Stanhope, NJ 07874 asshe submitted an OPRA request in writing to the OPRA custodian for the District which is fundedunder the judiciary responsibility of the Board of Chosen Freeholders Andrew Fraizer, Esq. and withthe aide of Clifford Lundin, Esq. the former Mayor of Hopatcong wherein Clifford Lundin, Esq. filed amalicious quasi-crimimal charge only against Thomas Caggiano for being one of three signatories on aletter to the Office of Attorney General’s Director of Law and Public Safety along with Kathryn Cag-giano and Mary Pawar all whom signed petitions and letters to the Borough of Stanhope to complywith the federal, county and municipal codes and remove violations to the site plan and safety and envi-ronmental laws as noted on the site plan approved for the Project Block 10902 Lots 10 and 12, 2 and 6Oak Drive, Stanhope Sussex County, New Jersey noted in exhibit #!1 the site plan approved by theBoard of Adjustment with variances including critical slope variances. me permanent injury and beenconduct by dozens of persons with police by fraud, trickery, tax fraud, perjury, bribery, giving aide toothers in criminal activty, submit false fiiings to the government Recod Council, Annual Financial Re-prots adn fianncial audiete drefprts federal agneies ad State agenices. willful deception in signed veri-fied affidavits, in notices published in the Press to foster a continuing agreed upon repeated pattern ofconduct with accomplices an complicity as published on http://thomascaggiano.com and the digital di-gest forwarded thereto under http://FreedomNewsDigest.com for a noted by the State of Nevada Attor-ney general in her letter entered into the above court record the federal crimes rise to life or death set-nences noted on the filed letter from the State of Nevada Attorney General published on http://thomas-caggiano.com/NVattorneygeneral.pdf and in act causing permanent injury, repeated mental torment forover 10 years which is considered worse the water boarding the crime of N.J.S.A. 2C:30-6 because ofthe terrorism and bodily harm to many persons rises to the 1st degree.

10. This is a verified certified affidavit based upon my own knowledge if any event documents pre-pared by me if willfully false I am aware I am subject to perjury and filing false reports to authorities.noted herein is false then I am aware I have committed perjury. To my knowledge every statement here-in can be verified and be found to be true. The discussion itself is so unbelievable unless one realizesthe senior FBI officials in Newark have stated The Sate of New Jersey is the Most corrupt in the unitedState of America.

11. Before noting the many factors in this submittal of a motion to disqualify Judge Hansbury, P.J. Chone must evaluate the totality of the circumstances for the last 44 years. In exhibit 1, is the Tax MapBorough of Stanhope for Block 10908 for SH#44 Application which was submitted as a tampered withSoil Erosion ads Sediment Control plan by the Developer ENF Development Co. LLC, owner FrankDawalt Jr, which erased the tile block on the origiantal approved Minor Subdsion approved by theBoard of Adjustument ads erased other aprts of the ddawng to cnceal the willful destructuin of sheadetrees rather then save the and over fill the site as noted by the alelged Borough Enginerer for Stanhopewho did NOT ahve any contract for over a deade per the Lcoal ulc C?ontractss, was note the municpalengieern as reeported by the Mayor ads /governing biddoy and allowed the incimetetn Borough attor-ney nd hs employee who aslo falsely respresetned herself as the Town Palnner as the Boroguh wasengged in fraud for over 30 years with false audited financial reports filed with the State, Federal gov-

ernment and Sussex County Board of Chosen Freeholders, Deparmtent fo Community Affaris, Depart-ment fo aw ads Pubic Safety, official newspaper NJ Herald and thousands of persons. When I stated theBorough of Stanhope to teh wannen cunty attorney refreal service they immedaitely said: We know. asknown by the State’s Treasury, Office of Attorney General and Governor fo Nj under the Jon Coine ad-minis tratin ads dururign the enite tenure fo Chsi Christie as Governor of nj and the US Attorney Dis-trict fo New Jersey Paul Fishman and the DOJ. dated Aug 24, 1970 which shows Valley Road, EastDrive and Oak Drive and the Locations of Lots 2and 6 Oak Drive, Stanhope, NJ and the location of the14 property owners surrounding the two lot minor sub-division as shown in the public deeds publishedon http://thomascaggiano.com/deeds.pdf. The lots on Block 10902 Lots 10, 11 and 12 were note devel-oped while all surrounding lots were. The reason was the topography of the land as 2 Oak drive has avery large gorge within it caused by erosion of perhaps thousands of years caused water flows fromlarge marshlands and underground stream which came out in the gorge located on 2 Oak drive Block10902 Lot 10, 2Oak Drive, Stanhope, N.J. 07874 with a wetland permit issued that required allchanges to the plan that was approved by the Board of Adjustment and placed into the deeds with theresolution required DEP approval of all changes to the plan and compliance with all federal, countyand municipal codes.

12. I was naive to believe the the State of New Jersey most corrupt State in U.S. A. according to FBiagents sttatements to newspaoers would comply with the mandatory safety and health laws, deeds andother laws or even the Constitution of NJ and US and Supreme Court case law noted below which havebeen violated by court orders issued by Thomas Weisenbeck. A.J.S.C. and retained by Judge S. Hans-bury and 5 corrupt attorneys, 3 from the Office of Sussex County Counsel and two for the Township ofGreen with of course the Borough of Stanhope’s corrupt municipal attorney Richard Stein, Esq. gettingcopies of the letters prepared by these attorneys. . . but after 13 years the totally of the corruptionacross the United States of America, the various Departments for the federal government being DOJ,HHS, USPS would protect our safety and health but I was wrong. Retaliation, false imprisonment as-sault by the State trooper, defamation of character, and denial of all civil rights under color has reachednew heights under the infested courts in the Morristown Morns County Superior Court under DocketsSSX-L-847-07, SSX-C-1-13 and SSX-C-43-13 including those in more then a dozen quasi-crimimalconvictions by Judge Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. in the Joint municipal court in Green a now the Mayor hasbeen arrested as noted in the newspapers and the corrupt Shared municipal court of Stanhope and Ho-patcong and Joint municipal court in Wantage, Stillwater and Borough of Sussex under Judges Mul-hern, J.M.C., Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. and others and the infested State of NJ’s Supreme Court’s ACJC,OAE and OAC Glenn Grant, J.A.D. protected by Chief Justice Stuart Rabner and the State of NJ Sen-ate Judiciary Committee and U.S. Attorney District of N.J Paul Fishman, Esq. as terrorism, fraud withmalice is how the government works especially with the bully in charge former U.S. Attorney for theDistrict of NJ the GOP possible candidate for President of the United State of America. Chris Christieand his gang of former U.S. Attorneys brought to control the Branches of Government of the State ofNew Jersey in bastion arrogant hubris conduct. Protected by the U.S. Attorney Eric Holder and Dis-trict of NJ U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman, the U.S.. Courts at the highest levels, the National, Democraticand Republican Governors Association and State of NJ State Bar Association. my naivete has been re-moved by the corruption in the State of Nevada as noted on http://thomascaggiano.com/northlasvegas.I was not aware how totally corrupt the U.S. OCE Court was in California. Nevada and New Jersey andhow utterly criminal activity is forested.

13. To prove beyond any reasonable doubt a photograph taken of Thomas Caggiano by Mr Fleming inthe rear of 5 Valley Road shows a rock wall that does NOT exist on either certified Soil and Erosionand Sediment Control Plan signed by the Department of Agriculture’s Sussex County Soil Conserva-tion District and the deck shown is on the side of the house to the north not the south as shown on the

drawing certified by Lundin, Esq. AFTER the house was sold with a full certificate of occupancy asthis photo was shown in an Open Public meeting in the Borough of Stanhope’s Town Council with Ri-chard A. Stein, Esq. present and filed in the Township of Greens’ municipal court on quasi-criminalcharges by Dana and Hinkes in a court without jurisdiction as noted sin front of the corrupt AssignmentJudge Weisenbeck, A.J.S.C. To add evidence a second Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan exhibit#4 was signed by Clifford Lunden. Esq. and entered as evidence by John Cilo Jr. in his won formalcompliant response 05-13, 05-13.a and 05-13.b as well as two others retaliated for years being MaryPawar and Iqbal Pawar as all on the deck outside their own house when John Cilo Jr after lying severaltimes admitted the development and topography did NOT comply with the drawings he himself signedcalled the site plan. Only in U.S.A. apparently from coast to coast is the federal Judiciary branch abranch of government on of political agenda with 5-4 decision the norm and both parties attacking eachother resulting in a President who uses executive orders to change laws such as Obama care that hiswon party passed in Both parts of Congress. of rights in a conspiracy against one rights to protect thepower structure.

14. With that over view sumary some additional exhibits focus on the level of corruption using Block10902 Lot 10 and 12 only as an example for offcial corruption was rampant and those honest employ-ees that requested investigations were severely retaliated against with firings or having to retire on dis-ality or move such a my wife and myself to what we considerr safer havens North Las Vegas, NV butno U.S. Marshall were sent to our home AFTER I filed a complaint against the corrupt U.S. DistrictCourt Judge and U.S. Magistrate George Folely in the 9th District noted in http://thomascaggia-no.com/foley.pdf and other court filings against Eric Holder, DOJ, Executive Office of U.S. Attorneysand Pual Fishman the U.S. Attorney for District of New Jersey, filed 50 Affdaivs of Praoble Cause andNONE had a single probale cause hearing nor in fact was any testimony taken on more then 60 denialsof access I filed as the GRC is a well known haven of corrupt officials who are Chris Christie’s Cabientofficials and a corrupt attorney from Morristown as the corrupt Chair has recused herself for years andthe Attorneys therein are infested with not only lack of Ethics but retaliation under color with manycorrupt Judges at all levels. water that at tiems filled all the proerpoty behidn with wter over flowingbetwen th ltos. Do the very step slope and essentially imposible terraine to cost effectively build uponas it was essentially impossible to fill the gorge with compressed eath in any stable manner with andunderground stream that came under Oak Drive which appeared in the middle of the gorge shown onthe site plan approved by theBoard of Adjsutment.. As I have live adajcent t oteh lot adfor 30 yeras,and had hiked in the large marshland areas I was very familair with the extreme difficulty it would beto protect the lower level property owners at 1, 3 and 5 Valley Raod as a concerned neighbor. . Myknowldge and fears came to apss wehn a developer sought o build on the three small sub-sized lotswith large houses not in conformance with the community standarss and would require extense com-press fill, and extreme care to prventa adverse impacts to the lower propoerties. After one year of con-stant meetings with many property owners objecting to the proposed the three lots plan was rejected bythe Board of Adjustment. Thereafter a two lot plan with elimination of the middle lot with multiple var-iances and a wetland permit was approved and requiring retention of many trees was approved by theBoard of Adjustment without any public comment rejecting the site plan was approved at Exhibit #1but never certifeid by the State of New Jersey as a chronolgy of prior events as of Apr 5, 2006 wasfiled with the courts and plaintiffs and others such published onhttp://thomascaggiano.com/oldchronology.pdf

15. The property owners surrounding the site were unaware that the local municipal codes demandedeven more stringent safety criteria for erosion control for Critical Slope Areas and Wall constructionheights as we expected the Borough to have a competent professional engineer and planner. It was not

until the development had started that our concerns on over filling of the lots and not using any stabl-ized access became clear when after the property was developed with both lots filled in with uncom-pressed fill and the trees to be saved on 2 Oak Drive wee started to be willfully destroyed as no protec-tion for tree roots was ever made violating the protection codes as using a very large back hoe devicefor days on end Frank Dawalt Jr slashed at the large shade trees to be saved smashing them to pieces.Upon the transfer of the deed, Mary Pawar, Iqbal Pawar and I assisted the new homeowner a friend tomove items stored on our property such as a trampoline as their children played in our back yards.Upon moving the equipment to the 6 Oak Drive property, I for the first time looked at the rear stonewall that was dropped in place from above using totally unsafe operations and saw a 150 ft. long rockwall that was 10 feet high NOT shown on the site plan. I went to the Borough to see a copy of whathad been approved. The site was a disaster in total violation of safety codes, and plans as 14 propertyowners shown on Exhibit #2 all petitions the borough to comply wit the site plan as many propertyowners complaint at numerous meetings. I obtained from the Sussex County Clerk who I informed herand the Sussex County Administrator the deeds submitted by ENF Develpment were fraudulant. Thedeputy Sussex County Clerk was the former corrupt Borough of Stanhope Mayor Brian Mc Neilly whohas returned to the Borough of Stanhope as its town administrator after the Borough of Stanhope hadTeri Massood run away without any severance pay in a cover-up of treachery by George F. Grahamthen a member of the Governing Body now a member of the totally infested Board of Chosen Freehold-ers and three corrupt Sussex County Office of Counsel attorneys in my opinion. Exhibit #3 is the falsetampered with certified Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan certified by the corrupt Sussex CountySoil Conservation district over the objections of my self and wife Kathryn when I met the Board at aformal hearing. It was invalid upon my appeal to the corrupt Department of Agriculture executive sec-retary James Sadley and his corrupt assistant Frank Minch who attended a meeting with the AssistantCommissioner Lisa Jackson, her DEP staff and an attorney from the Department of Law and PublicSafety’s division of law as they were all aware of the cover-up and violation of Safety and health lawsand fraudulent reports. Lisa Jackson then became the Chief of Staff for Gov Jon Corzine and then theEPA administrator to President Obama and resigned when it was learned she using her dog’s name asan email account so that people could not submit FOIA requests with correct data needs. Ms Jacksonand her follow=on DEP commissioner has known of the fraud under Gov Chris Christie’s entire tenureas has his Secretary of Agriculture, the State Ethics Commission and the Comptroller Matt Boxer andregalement as shown in the letter published on http://thomascaggiano.com/vaz.pdf. filed in NJ courts.The title block was erased as well as lot data on one of the lots but the Deck on the rear is shown on thecorrect location as it was not erased and Exhibit #4 noted as My defendant’s exhibit D-5 in the corruptJoint municipal court of Green, Fredon, Hampton and Borough of Andover with William Hinkes, Esq.the attorney, Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. and known to the corrupt perjurer for over a decade Richard A.Stein, Esq. as they all defamed me in blistering statements allowing no character witnesses in my de-fense on a dozen false charges filed by Borough of Stanhope officials and employees in Stanhope ofwhich all were transferred to the Township of Green without approval of any Assignment Judge andwherein William Hinkes portrayed himself before all defendants Va the municipal prosecutor but wasNOT as he was bribed for per the Joint resolution NO agreement was done as required for him to bethe municipal prosecutor. which was a court exhibit in courts and other fillings proves beyond any rea-sonable doubt the deck was built on the wring side of the house, stairway going in the wrong direction,and a large stone wall that does NO T exist on the drawing. This photograph was held up in front of theMayor Diana Kuncken face after I showed it to the public that attended the meeting. as well as the cor-rupt Governing Body, Borough Attorney Richard A. Stein, Esq. and Teri Massood at a public towncouncil meeting in a room full of property owners but the corruption continues for a decade more.

16. The corrupt Township Committee of the Township of Green including its corrupt Borough AttorneyWilliam Hinkes, Esq., magistrate Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. and municipal court clerk is Maria SpeiglerTake notice: The Township of Green’s Mayor was arrested on Jul 17, 2014

17. The recently elected District Senator, members of the Assembly and Board of Chosen Freeholdersare all corrupt Republicans protected by the Republican Governor Chris Christie the chair person forthe Republican Governor’s Association. See http;//thomascaggiano.com/corrorption.pdf as they havebeen aware for months of the corruption throughout Morris County and Sussex County Vicinages ashas the Lt Gov and Secretary of State and the New Jersey attorney generals appointed by Chris Chris-tie. and were approved by the Democratically controlled Senate judiciary Committee.

18. Block 10902 Lots 10 and 12 as Lot 11 was realigned to split lot 11 so the development had twohouses on 2 and 6 Oak Drive with an under ground water collection system, a relocated storm sewerline through the property, a conservatory easement to protect the rear 18 feet of property, retaining 4very large shade trees mark on the drawings, have both lots accessible during development ONLY fromOak Drive with stabilized rock clearing entrance ways to prevent sediment from entering the watersewer system which leads to the Musconetcong River downhill and cover river plants with sedimentadversely impacting the clarity and ecology of the natural river which contains is stock with fish. Thetopography shown before development and after development, locations of deck, staircase direction,door entry from deck t other house, tree locations and size of trees marked t be saved, location of thestabilized access are all marked with added notes shown on the Nov 7, 2001 exhibit 2 plan approved bthe Borough of Stanhope Board of Adjustment and by John Cilo Jr by fraud as per the Map Filing Lawand Borough of Stanhope municipal codes the Borough engineer must sign the drawing but as reportedby the Municipal Clerk Mr Robin Kline, RMC, to 10 agencies and the Mayor of Stanhope, Borough At-torney Richard Stein and Teri Massood who threatened Ms Robin Kline for two years as do to the trau-

ma she was gravely mentally injured from sustained prolong harassment, threats worse the water board-ing. as known by hundreds of persons as the Office of Gov data base published on http://thomascaggia-no.com/deeds.pdf 071029GovCorzineOPRAdata.pdf sent to the NJ Attorney General Department ofLaw and Public Safety and other reports have been published for years and entered as exhibits in feder-al courts, the N.J. Supreme Court Clerk and the OAC, ACJC and DRB with over 100 witnesses listed.

19. As shown in the Town administrator they had NO valid contact and both the Code enforcement of-ficial Arlene Fisher and the Stanhope environmental commission all requested investigations as did theproperty owners surrounding the site, Fraud was constant, false inspection reports were constant, brib-ery is constant, perjury as many departments of the federal govt, State government and County officialsand numerous municipal governments have and continue to commit federal felonies of 18 U.S.C. Sec-tion §4, N.J.S.A. 2C:2-1 as the cover-up has now encompassed the U.S. District Courts which protectthe U.S. Attorney Holder, DOJ, FBI, IRS , U.S.P.S. , Office of Gov Chief of Staff , former U.S. Districtof New Jersey attorneys such as Stuart Rabner now Chief Justice of NJ Suprme Court, Lt Gov Gua-dagno. The deceit, criminal abuse of court processes under Judge Hansbury, P.J.Ch continues with ram-pant deceit by the Borough of Stanhope Conspirators as now federal investigations of the DOJ, IRS andlocation of houses and rear decks. This plan was NEVER certified by the State as required by State lawand Stanhope’s municipal codes nor has any Project drawing existed showing locations of these struc-tures after Lot 12 or 6 Oak Drive was sold and no as-built drawing were ever approved for either houseas required by the Board of Adjustment resolution with the developer. For since the Plan was approvedby the Broad of Adjustment and inserted into the deeds for the propertiesas noted in http://thomascaggiano.com/deeds.pdf as corruption, fraud, bribery, retaliation and terrorizeshas come to many that dared file complaints or even know but were too afraid to report the corruptionand suffered great bodily harm such as William Fitzgibbons, Esq. who after agreeing with others re-cused himself and told me to proceed to the FBI but in fact the FBI has no jurisdiction on Title 2Ccrimes. After telling me to proceed to the FBI, he suffered a stroke from the stress and retired there-after. The audio recording of the meeting was also provided the court and the State of NJ Attorney Gen-eral and is published on http://thomascaggiano.com/060614fitzgibbonsscpo.mp3 . The Netcong courtadministrator Ann Sheridan a friend could not handle the corruption of her own municipality being theBorough of Netcong, its municipal Judge and Chief of Police, cried and retired on disability for it wasshe who told me that Thomas Manahan P.J.S. C issued an order to all municipal courts in the MorrisCounty and Sussex County Vicinages against my wife Katherine Caggiano as he spelled her namewrong and never met either of us nor informed us of this undocumented unconstitutional court order.and myself that no municipal judge could even conduct any probable cause hearing after I did same inthe corrupt City of Newton and the corrupt municipal judge was John Mulhern, J.M.C., as the thendeputy municipal court administrator Ms Tania Ell feared reporting the corruption to the State PoliceOfficial Corruption Bureau as retaliation was known by dozens as Ian Brennan of the Office of Gov re-quested an investigation and when it became known to either the Department of Community Affairs orGov office he was fired. Richard Stewart the former Mayor of the Township of Andover was anotherretaliated witness ads the Borough of Stanhope fired him Richard Stewart became Town administratorof Stanhope after Teri Massood ran away from Stanhope and was selected by Stanhope as an excellentTown Administrator. In his fist week in Office in the central hall entrance way he posted the C.E.P.A.notice which Teri Massood refused to post. He was fired. The new municipal clerk Ms Robin Kline,RMC after the prior municipal clerk also fled as she has been found guilty of violating four OPRA lawsthereafter. I was banned from Stanhope and repeatedly threatened by its own letter and no court orderbanning me from attending open Public Meetings and contacting officials and employee as that is howRichard Stein has coordinated such a wide spread action of tyranny in so many Superior Courts andmunicipal courts and had the GRC not find the, a wetland permit with requirements, steep slope varian-ces and a lot size variance. Despite the lies by Richard Stein, Esq. the attorney for Stanhope I nor any-

one to my knowledge of the adjacent property owners ever disagreed wit the plan approved by theBoard of Adjustment, other then myself later after I read Stanhope Land Development Code Chapter100 and noted Walls required special approval if constructed higher then 4 ft. and that in addition to slitfences to control soil and sediment run-off hay ales were also required which is NOT required in theSoil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and the Wetland Permit required approval of drawings and anychanges to drawings and the Project itself was a minor sub-division therefore requiring certification bythe State of NJ Department of Agriculture prior to moving any dirt . The corrupt Mayor of StanhopeDiana Kuncken who was at times a Town Council President and member of its Governing Body with aFinance Board composed of two members of the Governing Body that had to approve all payments forthe Borough and the Town Administrator was Teri Massood who later ran away from Stanhope, theBorough Attorney and municipal Prosecutor were the same persons for over 30 years being the corruptlaw firm of Laddey, Clark and Ryan LLC with its corporate attorney Richard A. Stein, Esq. a ring lead-er and coordinator that continues under SSX-C-1-13 Township of Green v. Thomas Caggiano as Ri-chard Stein, Esq. has lead the corruption with the New Jersey Attorney General’s Department of Lawand Public Safety’s Division of Law’s DAG for the Department of Community Affairs’ Debra Allen,Esq. and the corrupt attorneys and voting members on the Government Record Council which has a ser-ies of corrupt executive directors being Catherine Starghill, Esq. who filled a malicious petty disordercharge against me for harassment in the corrupt City of Trenton municipal court with its corrupt munic-ipal Judge Sancinito, J.M.C. its corrupt Office of Municipal Prosecutor and series of Record custodianswho were reported to the City of Trenton’s Police and because they refused to identify themselves andhung up the telephone as I was recently directed by the FBI in Newark to contact the local police as hasbeen done in Morristown, Newton, with reports of their improper actions to the IAD for Police in theCity of Trenton, US Attorney for District of NJ Trenton field office, FBI Trenton filed office andothers. As stated by Prescient Harry Truman the following has occurred through the for after a year.The Stanhope mayor is agaisnt a member of Stanhope’s corrupt governing body and prtected by toomany ageneis to count. lives at 8 Valley Road marked with an X and can see the development from herfront window, a part of a wall then built a 50 ft. long and 10 ft. high made of rocks, the rear deck on 6Oak Drive, Stanhope, N.J. 0874 and her neighbors that all wrote a petition to the Borough of Stanhopeto comply with the site plan that was approved for the Project. The actions of the government to sup-press by dozens of denials of actions by the Borough of Stanhope officials and retaliation imposed bthe unconstitutional restraining order that per the State of Nevada letter that has to life or death senten-ces does NOT come lightly. As noted in the official newspaper of northern New Jersey 14 propertyowners surrounding a development that has hazards of such nature and terror that all property ownerssurrounding the illegal development signed a petition to the Borough of Stanhope and each propertyowner of every house surrounding the two lot minor sub-division on Block 10902 Lots 10 and 12, 2and 6 Oak Drive, Stanhope, NJ 07874 wrote individual letters to the Borough of Stanhope of fear, andafraid to even bring their grandchildren into their back yards. In fact for 1 year before the two lot mi-nor subdivision was approved by the Board of Adjustment, the proposed three separate large home de-velopment which would remove all the large shade trees on the three small subsides lots 2, 4 and 6 OakDrive, Stanhope, NJ hat no longer met zoning requirements and would denude the largely shaded lotswould also require extensive sleep slope variances. A raging battle engaged between the adjacent prop-erty owners to have a safe development. The Borough of Stanhope has additional safety constraints forany developer as the homes on 1, 3 and 5 Valley Road downhill of the lots could NOT even be builtprobably as they were all on slabs with water tables hat in heavy rains had the lawns covered withwater as the property behind their hoses was fed by an underground spring that ran from a very largemarshland.. To protect the property owners a sever severe controlled site plan was approved for twohouses with an underground interconnected water collection system and critical slope variances re-quired per Stanhope municipal code not only slit fences to control sediment run-off but hay bales andNO high walls were on the property which had its entire topography contour changes with the rear

deck on 6 Oak Dive to the south of the property and the staircase leading south so that the propertyowners below would NOT have a deck looking over their heads for privacy and large shade trees over80 ft. tall were marked to be saved. The lots were approved as a minor sub-division and with wetlandpermit was issued that required any changes in the plans to be approved by the accomplices in the DEPand that all federal, state and local laws has to be approved. The development was a disaster as bould-ers rolled down steep hills pushed by the developers machines. The property was completely so overfilled and boulders went not only into a protective conservation area of 18 feet but onto property own-ers property being 3 and 5 Valley Road. Many property owners complaints in fact for years of the cov-er-up same contractor developing another site with an underground stream that lead from the marshlandto the gorge going under Oak Dive and at times being a waterfall with waves in the lake formed behind3 and 5 Valley Road That initial approved Soil Erosion and sediment control plan was never submittedto the State of New Jersey to be approved and the wetland was already buried without the under groundwater collection system and the illegally developed property violating the site plan on 6 Oak Drive,Stanhope, NJ was sold on Jul 12, 2002 with a full certificate of occupancy having been issued. In fact,upon inspection, the Borough engineer who did NOT even have a valid contract with the Boroughwrote the Construction Code Official Thomas Pershouse to stop all work on the development and thatthe site was not in compliance with the topography of the site plan approved by the Board for Adjust-ment. in addition, because a proper transformer was not instilled by the power company, the lightswould dim on properties across the street on Oak Drive when the air conditioners went on at 6 OakDrive.

20. Thomas Caggiano having retired after a 30 year care noted on his background page http://thomas-caggiano.com highly skilled in engineering and other fields assisted the 6 Oak Drive property ownersmove a large trampoline they has placed in his own back yard on 10 East Drive allowing the children toplay on his property and both the homeowners of 10 and 12 East Drive, Stanhope, NJ being Mary Pa-war and Iqbal Pawar were also good friends of the new homeowners as both property owners storedsome of the home furnishings in their own homes as the new property owners lived down the street be-fore locating to the larger house. Upon taking the trampoline over to the 6 Oak Drive and other goodsis the first time Thomas Caggiano ever saw what was actually built. A disaster as a ten foot high wallmade of rocks was built with too much earth between the rocks which were dropped by the construc-tion equipment and no bottom with a angle for forces to hold the wall existed nor was two over oneconstruction sued for as soon as it rained, the pressure blew out portions of the bottom like a dam andlarge gaping holes existed in the walls call “Bear Dens” b the children. Granmothers with the childrenwere totally terroized for I visited the site again and the grandmother was sreaming at the Governingbody member standing in her back yard with boulders and mud all around. A cover-up has existed for12 years of umlimited fraud, tampered with drawings being certified by the State and fraud in courts asThomas Caggiamo briefed the corrupt Land Use Board twice a month on the violations of the Soil Ero-sion and Sediment Control Act, the wetland permit, the shade tree commisison’s Chaper 53 regulationsand even the power systems. I have submitted numerous motions properly several per court rules tohave a conference for scheduling and other purposes after requesting same at the Apr 4, 2014 hearingand obtained a copy of the court video which has been published on http://thomascaggiano.com/video-weisenbeck.asf and have filed under affirmation in lieu of an other other court video such as the pub-lished on http:/thomascaggiano.com/videobozonelis.asf wherein the same false statements regardingmy character and facts which are instantly disproven by the Government Record Council’s own pub-lished data base that the Borough of Stanhope dozens of times violated the Open Public Record Actand even obtaining statements under oath from the township of Green’s Borough Attorney WilliamHinkes, Esq. and the town administrator they they either destroyed or no longer retained copies of itsmunicipal prosecutor records in violation of State law being M170000 has accepted emails from KevinKelly, Esq. which have never been sent by mail violating court service rules. Furthermore, the plaintiffs

have implied they are employed by the plaintiffs as Government officials and as apparently contractedlaw firms but no discussion of hiring any attorneys nor official minutes even exist by the Board ofChosen Freeholders even consider authorizing the financial officer that such a lawsuit was even discusseven even in closed session.

21. The court has none by staff and filings the other Judges within the Vicinage have repeatedly evenwithout formally recusing themselves apparently have although several have followed court rules andfiled refusals such as Judge Mc Govern III,J.S.C. who noted the court records were incorrect. The courtchambers and plaintiffs have been made are in numerous communications that the Sussex County Supe-rior Court staff have told the defendant that Judge Thomas Manahan, P.J.S.C. has issued some ordersthat the Pro Se defendant even living across the county and is frequently not in internet nor mailingability for weeks or months has refused to allowed Thomas Caggiano to make a telephone call usingship satellite communications and has refused to respond to any question not identifying themselves,nor providing any specifics on a court order or instruction denying thomas Caggiano due process rightswhich has been constant in the Joint Municipal court of Green, Hampton, Stillwater and Borough ofAndover which both is Office of municipal prosecutor, its court magistrate and its court administratorhave all refused to provide Thomas Caggiano a copy of any requested government Record on the qua-si-criminal charges transferred to the Joint municipal court without any request or motion made by theproper court of jurisdiction being the Borough of Stanhope and the municipal court without fear hasconstantly violated also court rules by denying twice by Judge Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. with the knowl-edge of the Vicinage Trial Court administrators for years, the Administrator of the Courts per courtrules Glenn Grant, J.A.D. and the State of N.J. Supreme Court and other patties as noted in the filedcourt filings and letter t the Department of Justice Public Corruption Unit as directed by the Public in-tegrity Section filed in the court and published on http://thomascaggiano.com/acjcglenngrant.pdf.

22. Whereas the court orders of Judge Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. in the Township of Green obviously vio-late even the unconstitutional court orders issued under SSX-C-1-13, SSX-C-43-13 and others in thatthe court orders issued by the Township of Green state Pay your taxes, water bill and sewer bill andyou can ONLY make 911 calls is an outrage known to the court and as noted b the State of Nevada At-torney General the court orders violate numerous federal laws with very serious penalties.

23. Whereas the Plaintiffs attorney does Not use any apparently approved email box has apparentlybeen using a private email NOT an official email address owned by the Board of Chosen Freeholdersof which no retaining is made by the county and the attorneys who represent themselves as County offi-cials at times have now stated the LAW firm will delete all emails received thus violating all Record re-tention laws as the County would have no way of having knowledge of what the i=their own officialsare doing and could NOT fulfill their judiciary duties.Whereas the Counsel has stated I have violated the court orders it has not filed any criminal nor anyquasi-crimimal charge for harassment as the county brought the civil suite and such communications i scivil Suite can obvious be with great zeal but a County Official can NOT threatened to destroy Officialgovt records and stated they intend such official misconduct. Nor has the court despite extensive mo-tions with Adopted Referenced exhibits submitted under affirmation which is considered evidence incourts and without any evidence to the contrary or argument supported the plaintiffs in al decision dis-missing requests for oral argument or any confrontation. nor request by the court to the plaintiff to sub-stantive any of its claims. and just generalized false statements such as I have stated all persons are cor-rupt when having read any of the documents confirmatory government records, physical structuresshown in photographs and audio recodings of themselves are willfully ignored. and contradicted in let-ters t other court by deceit which is obvious to the court if a perceived bias was not obvious. has de-nied the due process right to obtain copies by OPRA or Common law right of access while in a civil

suite which violates Court prescient noted below and it is the opinion as the threats have not resulted inconduct but being officials of the government such threats are criminal coercion and have retaliatedagainst Thomas Caggiano and buy joint ownership of a mortgage in foreclosure also denies her own in-dividual rights by denying access to county codes, Open Public meetings by the Planning Board andcommunications with the Sheriff so that Thomas Caggiano can not have immediate access to his ownmedical records and other records by the sheriff for documents to be provided the Dept. of justice andFBI as directed by the Department of Justice Public Corruption Unit, the DOJcivil division Criminal Unit and FBI Special agents in Nevada and New Jersey.

24. I submitted motion to the court to change venue to the Mercer County Superior Court per R 4:3-3(c) or other court and provided numerous other motions to remove part or all of the Court restraintsimposed by Judge Weisenbeck, A.J.S.C. AFTER Judge Edward Gannon, J.S.C. imposed NO temporaryrestraints and stated contrary to the plaintiffs there was no harm. The court orders prevent even writtengrievances be provided to the Sussex County Board of Chosen Freeholders or its officials and doesNOT permit submission of required documents to the Planing Board, engineering department on futureinvestments in private property and deny access to my won inmate records and medical records whilebeing falsely imprisoned in the Sussex County jail wherein as stated on the court Record I was deniedprescribed drugs and taken in handcuffs and shakes to the Newton memorial hospital and there is noRecord of my assaulting or physically harming any persons nor any complaint submitted by any per-son other then the corrupt State, County and municipal government officials and their employees whileother have been retaliated whistle blowers and fear prevents the continued reporting by Kathryn Cag-giano as she has received former death threats, been threatened by Judge Dana, J.M.C., had undocu-mented court orders issued against her by Thomas Manahan, P.J.S.C. and one’s actually filed in courtswit the wrong spelling of her name without any due process. for the right of submitting grievances inperson at essentially Open Public meeting even those of federal or charity events held in SussexCounty facilities and those of the township Green are denied. The Plaintiffs even requested I be deniedaccess to the Sussex County Park and all Open Public meetings as such is blatant abuses of court proc-ess and in my view a criminal abuse of tax payers funds to criminally coercion me and other retaliatedwitnesses

25. The Sussex County Prosecutor’s office has known of the corruption I reported as deceptive re-sponses were proved by Government officials I adopted the recording in the Sussex County Prosecu-tor’s Grand jury room wherein I met the first assistant prosecutor William Fitzgibbons which shows thelarge amount of evidence provided the prosecutor who with the detective recused themselves instruct-ing me in agreement with others in the Department of Law and Public Safety to proceed to the FBIwhich has thousands of records, audio recordings ,movies, documents I have provided them as directedby DOJ numerous agencies and the FBI in Newark, NJ

26. The audio recording provided the the Morris County Superior Court which has kept the unconstitu-tional court orders issued by Judges Weisenbeck, A.J.S.C. and Township of Green’s magistrate CraigU. Dana, J.M.C. is published on http://thomascaggiano.com/060614fitzgibbonsscpo.mp3

27. You must pay taxes, water bill, sewer bill and can make 911 calls only to the Borough of Stan-hope. I have no civil rights denied me under color 18 U.S.C. §241, §242 and §2. I can not write, email,fax, telephone, apply for a cats license, read its municipal codes, submit any OPRA or Common lawright of access, can not file a greviances, can not report violations of municipal codes to the Code En-forcement Official nor Chief of Police or any officer or patrolman, can not file any Probable Cause affi-davits per R. 7:2-1, nor contact any official nor employee nor attend any open public meeting that isheld in the Borough of Stanhope facilities by any organization be it Stanhope, a charity, religiousgroup, count or stat e Open Public Meetings. nor can I even pay the fees to have a certificate of habilitydone on a home we were selling and is now in foreclosure as I can not communicate with the tax asses-sor, the code enforcement officials, its Land Use Board nor Sheriff nor court. , et. al. constraints to giveaide to those filing SSX-C-1-13 and SSX-C-43-13 is provided herein.

28. TAKE NOTICE: This story prined in the Star edger using inforamtion in the offcilla newspaperthe NJ Herals that repeatly wrote misleading stories which I wrote the newspaper to correct adn didNOT. The newsppaer stated the last two Townsadministrators of the Borough of Stanhope were fired.that is false sa Teri Massood was NOT fired she ran away without severance pay when the GovernmentRecord Council found the OPRA custodian has violated four OPRA laws and referred both the formermunicipal clerk ad Ms Teri Massood to the corrupt Office of Administrative Law.

29. Whereas the court staff has advised me on April 15, 2014 that the Court has NOT as on Apr 15,2014 issue its court order with a decision which was to be made Apr 10, 2014 but stated his staff doesno believe such approval of a Change of Venue will be made despite clear and convincing evidencethat by wide spread prior adverse publicly by the plaintiff’s attorney Kevin Kelly giving false informa-tion to the official newspaper in Sussex County which was published.

30. Judges Weisenbeck, A.J.S.C. and Hansbury joined in by the other municipal judges referred t theACJC in the compliant published on http://thomascaggiano.com/acjchansbury.pdf violated in my opin-ion their Administrative responsibilities as the Judge should require staff, court officials and others sub-ject this direction and those within the Vicinage control to observe the standards of fidelity and dili-gence and to refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice in their officials duties. AS I am not allowed topreform rights of due process and the staff has even refused to respond to any question on proceduresuch as filing for transcripts and other court records and receives information of a substantial likelihoodthat another judge has committed a violation of the Codes of ethics or has and receives information thatan attorney has a high like hood of a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct and the judge hasfailed to disqualify himself in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned should disqualifyhimself. Whereas the court Record and the reporting by others known by the defendant to other author-

ities to requests reviews and criminal investigations of the conduct within the court and by the plaintiffsattorneys gives a basis for refusals as well as the other adjudicative facts noticed in this letter brief andadopted referenced exhibits.

31. Whereas misconduct of the numerous attorneys has not been reported by the court to the the Stateof NJ Attorney Generals, violations of Title 2C:2-1 crime of omission is apparent by numerous partiesincluding Judges and attorneys and the township of Green and the Board of Chosen Freeholders evethrough provided as court records tampered with and erased State filings by the Sussex County SoilConservation District repeatedly as the Board of Chosen Freeholders as stated by the Department ofCommunity Affairs Local Government Services Deputy Mr. Vaz has a fiduciary responsibility to assureSussex County tax papery dollars are properly spent. Whereas the Department of Community Affairsfound the Borough of Stanhope has violated the Uniform Construction Code in the development of theminor sub-division, Block 10902 Lots 10 and 12, in the the Department of Agriculture State Soil Con-servation Committee had determined that the Sussex County Soil Conservation District certified adrawing tat was NOT even for the Project and that a full certificate of occupancy was issued even with-out the knowledge of the State as I brought the development to the attention directly but also uponreading the 2,7000 pages within its application file SH#44 the State agencies discovered it was awareby numerous newspaper that more then a dozen property owners objected to the safety and health andviolation of safety and health laws allowed by the Borough of Stanhope in fact has engaged in submit-ting verified certified affidavits by numerous parties that by its own records and statements publishedin official records were done in violation of numerous safety and health laws already found and thatdozens of denial of access decisions were made by the GRC.

32. Whereas the Codes of Ethics by the court in my opinion have been violated constantly and with fullknowledge other court staff have reported the alleged criminal conduct noted by the State of Nevadaand others to the FBI and State Police the court appears to be prejudicial at best by allowing such con-duct by the attorneys without filing per Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4 and N.J.S.A. 2C:2- 1 using its owncourt orders to vacate hidden ones by Judge Thomas Manahan, P.J.S.C. stated to exist by the court staffor take actions itself to have court staff comply with the own Codes of Ethics and reporting the attor-neys to the Morristown Bureau of Police which if willfully false would have had me charged wit filinga false police reports as I have done and to the Corrupt Morris County Prosecutor as known by the 150page report published on http://thomacaggiano.com/index.pdf and filed with chambers and court clerkwith other court videos and audio recordings already filed with the plaintiffs .

33. Whereas the Board of Chosen Freeholders has been aware of years of filed court documents in mydefense in the infested Township of Green attached with Court exhibit numbers thereon and the follow-ing filed and certified filing certified by the State is obvious the State have violated the following U.S.Supreme Court case law with impunity breeding a wide public perception of the duty to hear all pro-ceedings fairly for the restraining orders imposed by Judge Weisenbeck, A.J.S.C. and supported byJudge Hansbury P.J.Ch in my opinion and dozens of others has shown a constant bias and a Judge is re-quired to read all documents and referenced adopted exhibits which if done would NOT have resultingin the retention of restraints preventing due process itself or filing with other Government Agencies inthe Executive Branch OPRA Denial of Access for which the court has dozens on actions that denialsoccurred and common law rights of access were denied for which the court orders do NOT en allow theother courts to consider such actions on an individual case as directed in court findings.In addition, pretrial publicity with false statements by the attorneys to newspapers is provided as a rea-son for venue change per State v. Harris, 156 N.J. 122, 147-148 (1998) and State v. Bey, 96 N.J. 625(1984) but like other motions denied

34. Notice is given that a subsequent motion shall be submitted as a federal question to move thecourt to a U.S. District Court for which NO appeal is allowed by the plaintiffs per 28 U.S. Code § 1441- Removal of civil actions and other issues such as federal courts to hear disputes between citizens ofdifferent states per 28 U.S.C. § 1332, yet the attorneys for the Plaintiffs Mr. Kevin Kelly, Esq. who liedto the official newspaper the New Jersey Herald and such publicity also adverse jury trails in the vicin-age and violated the Codes of Ethics by violating the Rules of Professional Conduct by informing thirdparties which was then published in the Official Newspaper as have also false reports that the formerTown Administrator Teri Massood was fired from the Borough of Stanhope also published in the StarLedger which was also false as she ran away from the Borough of Stanhope as George Graham whowas then a member of the Governing Body of Stanhope and filed a false petty disorder charge as heagreed m letter to him and Mike Depew another corrupt Governing /body member when I wrote themboth as Governing Body members fro the Borough of Stanhope after the GRC made findings that theBorough of Stanhope had been found to have violated 4 OPRA laws and against the recommendationof the GRC own general council Vince Maltese, Esq. transferred cases to the corrupt State of NJ’s Of-fice of Administrative Law for burial on more then another dozen denials of access complaints. A statepolice witnesses are SGT Eric Fowlkes Badge 4792 and Maj L. Littles Floyd Badge 5375.. I note, thecorrupt Executive director Catherine Starghill, Esq. and follow-on GRC executive director has all con-spired in a continue repeated pattern with Voting members as the chair has now recused herself foryears and the GRC issued a request for denial of access to the Office of Gov which was respondedunder oath by the Acting NJ Attorney General’s Department of Law and Public Safety’s Division ofLaw which conspired with the Superior Court judges in Mercer County under Docket MER-C-102-07GRC v. Thomas Caggiano and with the Morris County Superior Court under SSX-C-847-07 Boroughof Stanhope v. Thomas Caggiano and Government Record Council and thereafter with Judge Rand,P.J.Ch which also issued unconstitutional court orders.

35. In a repeated pattern of official misconduct and giving aide to others in a pattern of criminal con-duct continues as racketeering is apparent t in my option and others reporting the courts’ conduct. ASsuch it is obvious that a perceived violation of loss in the integrity of the court exists under Judge Hans-bury who issued court orders without jurisdiction between entities in different states NOT under its ju-risdiction and issues court orders violating the many Case studies noted herein.

TAKE NOTICE OF LAW AND ADJUDICATIVE FACTS:

36. Whereas the following case law per rules of Evidence relevant material generally accepted to sup-port the disqualifying of Judge Hansbury, P.J.Ch regarding the improper perceived unconstitutional re-straining orders retained despite numerous motions and such objections by Kevin Kelly, Esq. that nomatter what motion I may prepare he objects beforehand shows a callous irresponsible conduct of acorrupt attorney who willfully and knowingly deceives newspapers an third parties with merit lessclaims and untruthfulness like the attorneys representing the plaintiffs in SSX-C-43-13. restraining or-ders that is quoted below and adopted as relevant material reading the actions of the Township ofGreen, Hampton, Fredon and Borough of Andover, its Office of Municipal prosecutor and known tothe Joint Court Committee and other municipalities therein including the lack of jurisdiction by theState of New Jersey to void the U.S. Constitutional rights.

Void judgments are those rendered by a court which lacked jurisdiction, either of the subject matter orthe parties, Wahl v. Round Valley Bank 38 Ariz. 411, 300 P. 955 (1931); Tube City Mining & MillingCo. v. Otterson, 16 Ariz. 305, 146 P. 203 (1914); and Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85

L.Ed. 2d 278 (1940). A void judgment which includes judgment entered by a court which lacks jurisdic-tion over the parties or the subject matter, or lacks inherent power to enter the particular judgment, oran order procured by fraud, can be attacked at any time, in any court, either directly or collaterally,provided that the party is properly before the court, Long v. Shorebank Development Corp., 182 F.3d548 ( C.A. 7 Ill. 1999). A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity andwithout legal effect, Lubben v. Selevtive Service System Local Bd. No. 27, 453 F.2d 645, 14 A.L.R. Fed.298 (C.A. 1 Mass. 1972). A void judgment is one which from the beginning was complete nullity andwithout any legal effect, Hobbs v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 485 F.Supp. 456 (M.D. Fla.1980). Void judgment is one that, from its inception, is complete nullity and without legal effect, Hol-stein v. City of Chicago, 803 F.Supp. 205, reconsideration denied 149 F.R.D. 147, affirmed 29 F.3d1145 (N.D. Ill 1992). Void judgment is one where court lacked personal or subject matter jurisdictionor entry of order violated due process, U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5 – Triad Energy Corp. v. McNell 110F.R.D. 382 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). Judgment is a void judgment if court that rendered judgment lacked juris-diction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process, Fed.Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28 U.S.C.A.; U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 5 – Klugh v. U.S., 620 F.Supp.892 (D.S.C. 1985). A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was, was a complete nullity andwithout legal effect, Rubin v. Johns, 109 F.R.D. 174 (D. Virgin Islands 1985). A void judgment is onewhich, from its inception, is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffec-tual to bind the parties or to support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of en-forcement in any manner or to any degree – Loyd v. Director, Dept. of Public Safety, 480 So. 2d 577(Ala. Civ. App. 1985). A judgment shown by evidence to be invalid for want of jurisdiction is a voidjudgment or at all events has all attributes of a void judgment, City of Los Angeles v. Morgan, 234P.2d 319 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 1951). Void judgment which is subject to collateral attack, is simulated judg-ment devoid of any potency because of jurisdictional defects, Ward v. Terriere, 386 P.2d 352 (Colo.1963). A void judgment is a simulated judgment devoid of any potency because of jurisdictional defectsonly, in the court rendering it and defect of jurisdiction may relate to a party or parties, the subjectmatter, the cause of action, the question to be determined, or relief to be granted, Davidson Chevrolet,Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 330 P.2d 1116, certiorari denied 79 S.Ct. 609, 359 U.S. 926, 3 L.Ed.2d 629 (Colo. 1958). Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdiction of parties or subjectmatter or that lacks inherent power to make or enter particular order involved and such a judgmentmay be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally, People v. Wade, 506 N.W.2d 954 (Ill.1987). Void judgment may be defined as one in which rendering court lacked subject matter jurisdic-tion, lacked personal jurisdiction or acted in manner inconsistent with due process of law Eckel v. Mac-Neal, 628 N.E. 2d 741 (Ill. App. Dist. 1993). Void judgment is one entered by court without jurisdictionof parties or subject matter or that lacks inherent power to make or enter particular order involved;such judgment may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally People v. Sales, 551 N.E.2d1359 (Ill.App. 2 Dist. 1990). Res judicata consequences will not be applied to a void judgment which isone which, from its inception, is a complete nullity and without legal effect, Allcock v. Allcock 437 N.E.2d 392 (Ill. App. 3 Dist. 1982). Void judgment is one which, from its inception is complete nullity andwithout legal effect In re Marriage of Parks, 630 N.E. 2d 509 (Ill.App. 5 Dist. 1994). Void judgment isone entered by court that lacks the inherent power to make or enter the particular order involved, andit may be attacked at any time, either directly or collaterally; such a judgment would be a nullity Peo-ple v. Rolland 581 N.E.2d 907, (Ill.App. 4 Dist. 1991). Void judgment under federal law is one in whichrendering court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over dispute or jurisdiction over parties, or acted inmanner inconsistent with due process of law or otherwise acted unconstitutionally in entering judg-ment, U.S.C.A. Const. Amed. 5, Hays v. Louisiana Dock Co., 452 n.e.2D 1383 (Ill. App. 5 Dist. 1983).A void judgment has no effect whatsoever and is incapable of confirmation or ratification, Lucas v. Es-tate of Stavos, 609 N. E. 2d 1114, rehearing denied, and transfer denied (IND. App. 1 dist. 1993). Voidjudgment is one that from its inception is a complete nullity and without legal effect Stidham V. Whel-

chel, 698 N.E.2d 1152 (Ind. 1998). Relief form void judgment is available when trial court lacked ei-ther personal or subject matter jurisdiction, Dusenberry v. Dusenberry, 625 N.E. 2d 458 (Ind.App. 1Dist. 1993). Void judgment is one rendered by court which lacked personal or subject matter jurisdic-tion or acted in manner inconsistent with due process, U.S.C.A. Const. Amends. 5, 14 Matter of Mar-riage of Hampshire, 869 P.2d 58 ( Kan. 1997).

37. The following Case law will also support the proper jurisdiction is a U.S. District court as intestateactions and rights under the Constitution are NOT within the jurisdiction of the Morris County Superi-or Court.

Bart v. City of Passaic (Passaic), GRC Complaint No. 2007-162 (April 2008). The Council held thatthe Custodian’s denial of the Complainant’s OPRA request, on the grounds that the Complainant couldonly obtain the requested records through discovery, is not a lawful basis for a denial of access.

38. Whereas Superior Court Staff and Municipal court administrators have to my personal knowledgefiled complaints to the FBI about the conduct of the Vicinage Judges at all levels and municipal offi-cials the court in the opinion of myself and other retaliated witnesses as repeatedly NOT acted in amanner that promotes public confidence i the integrity of the judiciary violating Canon 1 as PublicConfidence is obviously eroded when federal Senators and members of Congress in the State of Nv re-quest reviews of the U.S. Entities apparently protecting criminal acts or unethical conduct a the least bypublic officials through the Vicinage including requests for investigations by over two dozen officialsand private citizens in the Vicinage. The duty is to hear all proceedings but requests for a schedulingconference of witness, a;lowing due process as the court orders in violation of laws denies access viaOPRA o common law and even denies the filing of Complaints to the GRC on denials of access priorto the fling of the CIS. whereas no common law right of balancing can be denied in such actions by acourt before the common law right of access is even submitted as per NJ Case Law every common lawright of access MUST be evaluated on its own merits as of dozens no such Record of the balancing ofprongs have ever been performed. By order one can not even submit a request for copies of county co-des nor submit a requests per HIPPA for a copy of a prescription form submitted by Dr. Nielson, MDwhich Kevin Kelly, Esq. in a false letter violating Rules of Professional Conduct to Robert Mattia, Esq.stated did NOT even exist which is a false statement to a third party and typical violation of Codes ofEthics conducted by the Government attorneys as the unlimited responses of using tax payer funds toprevent due process itself is within the many court orders filed AFTER Judge Edward Gannon, J.S.C.found NO harm and did NOT expose any of the unconstitutional restraints requested by the attorneysand those granted by the Morris County Superior Court judges thereafter and other conspirators basedupon the hundreds of pages of court exhibits which include CDs with thousands of relevant materialsand must be read by the court prior to setting any trail date and such evidence has prevented my civilrights in proceeding before Judge Thomas Weisenbeck, A.J.S.C. and other Superior court Judges thatthemselves issued court orders which were reviewed by the State of Nevada’s Attorney General notedon the published letter on http://thomascaggiano.com/NVattorneygenreal.pdf filed wit the FBI, the NJcourts, the various county prosecutors and courts.

39. Morris County and Sussex County District Ethics Committee by Codes of Ethics R 1:14 did not as-sign Docket numbers to numerous complaints and upon discussions wit the State of New Jersey’s DRBChief Counsel as the Vicinage Trial Court administrators have for years as known by Judge ThomasWeisenbeck, A.J.S.C., Thomas Manahan, P.J.S.C, and S. Hansbury, P.J.Ch and court staff that have re-ported the alleged federal crimes to the FBI as I have and the State Police Official Corruption Bureauand or State of New Jersey Attorney General, Sussex County and Morris County State Prosecutor,State Ethics Commission, Department of Law and Public Safety, Division of Consumer Affairs, Stateof NJ Comptroller/ Inspector General. Commissioner of DEP for violation of wetland permit, Secretaryof Agriculture for violation of Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Act, Stanhope Environmental andShade Tree Commissioner, Mayor of Stanhope and Governing Body members, members for the Bor-ough of Stanhope, Land Use Board, Board of Adjustment, Stanhope Code Enforcement Officials,Town Administrator and the Joint municipal Court Committee as known to the Mayors of the other mu-nicipalities and their town municipal clerks by documents and complaints submitted to all these per-sons and their Borough Attorneys are in fact the same attorney William Hinkes, Esq. the former lawpartner of the Sussex County Prosecutor who protects them from indictment charges as CDR-2 wecompleted under oath and never had any Probable Cause hearing per Rule 7:2-1 by any municipalcourt magistrate nor did the court administrator as required by court rules submit the signed complaintsand evidence to the Sussex County Prosecutor as required for an investigation of the official complaintssigned under oath by Thomas Caggiano and his threatened and retaliated sole witness allowed KathrynCaggiano. filed dozens of Criminal Tip lines Reports an filings with the U.S.P.S. Inspection Service, NJTreasurer and US Treasury an IRS as dozens of persons have requested investigative reviews and in-

vestigations at all levels of Government provided in Verified Certified Affidavits and court filings withover 20,000 such pages alone. State Commission on Investigation, Select Committee on Investigationand Sussex County Board of Chosen Freeholders and Sussex County Prosecutor, State Police at Augus-ta Barracks and others. as I have and others have been severely retaliated or suffered grave injury hav-ing Stokers and other also retiring on disability for the Netcong municipal court as I was retaliatedagainst b the court judge and its Chief of Police as well a by the Police sent to our home in StanhopeNew Jersey and pounding on our door waking us up, with assault by State troopers against me in theCity of Trenton State Capital building in Trenton and by others in the State Department of CommunityAffairs all of which was reported useless to the State of NJ Attorney General many agencies and fiveCDs of relevant materials were recently provided me b the State Ethics Commission of dozens of viola-tions of ethics, bribery which was also reported as shown in the CD of evidence the Comptroller andInspector General recently provided me as well as 176 megs of material from the OIG U.S. Treasuryand additional unredacted pages by the Chief Counsel for the U.S. Treasury proves beyond any reason-able doubt the concerns of dozens of citizens, State employees, county employees have been ignoredby the Executive Branch and Judiciary Branches of the State, the County and many municipalities en-gaged in per my opinion racketeering by a pattern of bribery, deceit, trickery and a corrupt Vicinage

40. Whereas while his court orders the court has never held in over 1 year any conference to discussnumerous issues of discovery and other unconstitutional of the court orders that violate my U.S. and NJConstitutional rights nor rights under Common Law rights of access, Open public meting act, open pub-lic Record act, public duty under N.J.S.A. 2C:2-1 crime of omission, protection of property rights asmy wife Kathryn Caggiano and I are in the foreclosure process as noted on Apr 4, 2013 told to thecourt in the Apr 4, 213 hearing now proceeding under Docket do NOT allow service of court docu-ments to employees of the courts wherein in fact the attorneys themselves representing the SussexCounty Counsel Office are employees of the Board of Chosen Freeholders and have retuned letters un-opened, Whereas the court orders state I nor any representative can contact the Sussex County sheriffin any manner and no representative of Thomas Caggiano can contact the sheriff serve of court docu-ments and submittal of OPRA requests by case law can not be ordered to stop such civil rights withinthe Open Public Record Act, and whereas the Department of Community Affairs’ Government RecordCouncil with independent public voting members and members of the Cabinet can take testimony, issueinterim orders, refer matters to the independent Office of Administrative Law for a determination of awillful denial of access has occurred the court orders issued by the court even prevent retroactively theviolation of this civil right for denials that occurred even before the civil suite was filed

41. Whereas as the Mercer County Prosecutor upon obtaining records from the City of Trenton munici-pal court notified the Mercer County Superior Court upon my municipal appeal to over turn my pettyorder conviction at the and of the City of City Municipal court Judge and municipal prosecutor. In addi-tion, I met the Mercer County Prosecutor’s staff three times providing evidence of both federal andState of NJ title 2C crimes by dozens of officials within their jurisdiction and I am my related wife Ka-thryn both provided evidence of the corrupt Mercer County Superior Court Civil Part and its unconsti-tutional court orders. The letter from the Mercer County Prosecutor Office to the FBI Trenton field of-fice was provided the court and the plaintiffs on the published report on http://thomascaggiano.com/in-dex.pdf. This report by continued criminal and unethical conduct by dozens of government attorneysviolating the Codes of Ethics and by this court violation Codes of Ethics by orders given by Judge Tho-mas Manahan, P.J.S.C,. to the Morris county Superior Court staff prevent all verbal communication onfiling fees, questions of procedure and Judge Thomas Manahan, P.J.S.C. has issued court orders with-out Docket numbers, without hearings as known by the Morristown Municipal court that prevents anymunicipal Judge in Morris County or Sussex County from even having a Probable Cause hearing on ei-ther of us filing a Probable Cause for a Petty Disorder Affidavits of Probable Cause clearly not even in

the jurisdiction of the Superior Court as the court administrator would file a CDR-1 NOT allowed perJudge Thomas Manahan’s court order which he did NOT even notify us nor any court by letter andupon being notified by the excellent former court administrator in Borough of Netcong Ann Sheridanthat such a court order was issued and upon inspection the court order did NO even spell her name cor-rectly but spelled the court order as Katherine. Furthermore as known to Judge Thomas Manahan,P.J.S.C. and Judge Frank Zinna, P.,J.M.C. Judge Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. in the joint municipal court inWantage has for over 1 year to review my motions and also refused as stated in his letter to the abovecourts requested they review my motions and have not. Furthermore the municipal prosecutor in theJoint municipal court in Wantage has twice written the court as known by the municipality that he, Wil-liam Haggerty, Esq. of Dolan and Dolan PA in Newton, NJ recused himself and then Township ofWantage has refused to assign an alternative municipal prosecutor. The case actions were transferredupon my motion for a new trial date as the court orders are unconstitutional and the State witnessesconspired to hide the fact that NO Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan fro the minor subdivision onBlock 10902 Lots 10 and 12 was ever approved by the Sussex County Soil Conservation District forthe Minor Subdivision on 2 and 6 Oak drive directly across the street from my former home on 10 EastDrive for 30 years and unfortunately which we are foreclosing on as stated to the court before JudgeThomas Weisenbeck, A.J.S.C. who after Judge Edward Gannon, J.S.C. found contrary to that stated bythe plaintiffs found no irreparable harm and no reason for any temporary restraints. These unconstitu-tional restraints have now existed for 1 year issued on Apr 4, 2013 which are clearly unconstitutionalon their face and are requested to be removed but such request was denied by Judge S Hansbury, P.J.Ch violating my U.S. and State of NJ Constitutional rights which NO despite is made nor have theplaintiffs provided any Proof of Service to the court as required by court rules on submissions to thecourt and not had any specifics other then provide fraudulent verified certified affidavits which are ob-vious based upon the over 6,00 pages of curt records being mailed to my by the Morris County/ SussexCounty Superior Court in addition t the 1,740 pages under Docket SSX-L-847-07 Borough of Stanhopev. Thomas Caggiano and Government /record Council of Court records already provided me by theMorris County Superior Court and the court videos already available to the court as its the MorrisCounty Superior court itself.

42. These videos are published on

a) http://thomascaggiano.com/videobozonelis.asf

b) http://thomascaggiano.com/videoweisenbeck.asf

43. The court states:

“The motion papers are very very difficult to understand. This can be resolved by the requested confer-ence call requested at the Apr 4, 2014 hearing and in motions therein NEVER address by he court. Thecourt video is published on http://thomascaggiano.com/videoweisenbeck.asf and in motions and re-quests thereafter and oral argument all denied.

44. In addition, the audio recording of my appearance at an OPEN PUBLIC MEETING before the cor-rupt Sussex County Board of Chosen Freeholders with Dennis Mc Connell and the Board of ChosenFreeholders Clerk E. Morgan who are both separate pa=plaintiffs under Docket SSX-C-43-13 alongwith the Sheriff of Sussex County is published on http://thomascaggiano.com/081105SussexCounty-FreeholdersMtg.mp3 was previously submitted to the court and both plaintiffs but all referenced pub-lished documents, audio recordings, court videos noted an in the CDs Record attached as exhibits.

Sussex County Superior Court Ms. Kay Mack, has assembled over 6,000 pages of court records avail-able in the Sussex County Superior Court on cases filed in the Borough of Stanhope all of which mu-nicipal trial cases were transferred to other municipal courts within the Vicinage X Morris County andSussex County Vicinage in violation from the jurisdiction of the Borough of Stanhope to other jurisdic-tions in violation of rules governing the courts as noted in the hearing before Assignment Judge Tho-mas Weisenbeck, A.J.S.C. on Apr 4, 2013 published on http://thomascaggiano.com/videoweisen-beck.asf as temporary restraining court orders which as noted in prior filings with the court to removethe restraints which prevent the Sheriff from serving court documents, prevent me from hiring an attor-ney or any other person for firm to represent me, deny me access to numerous facilities of the Countyand Townships preventing me directly interfering with my efforts to foreclose on a property in the Bor-ough of Stanhope or learn of any new municipal codes therein and prevent common law rights of ac-cess, proven OPRA and rights as a publisher under the U.S. Constitution as noted in U.S. SupremeCourt Case known widely as Press Enterprise II to obtain information.

45. Adoption by reference: I adopt by reference all filings with the Sussex County Superior Court andMorris County Superior Court, the Township of Green and Boroughs of Hopatcong, and Stanhope andWantage municipal court wherein Judge Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. continues his corrupt was in a struc-tured enterprise in a repeated pattern of official misconduct by denying me my civil rights in a con-spiracy with the Township of Wantage and the municipal Prosecutor of Dolan and Dolan PA which alsorepresents the Borough of Stanhope’s corrupt Land Use Board and the firm Laddey, Clark and RyanLLC the municipal Prosecutor in Stanhope and the Joint municipal court of Stillwater and Hamptonand the infested Netcong municipal court with the exception of its Deputy court administrator Tania Ellwho have reported the criminal conduct both in Wantage and Netcong municipal courts to the State ofNJ and the FBI as has similarly Superior Courts and municipal courts and prosecutors by Kay MackSuperior Court Criminal Part as she informed Judge Conforti, J.S.C. that the Borough of StanhopeChief of Police who conspired with Borough officials to violate my Miranda rights and wrote falsefiled Probable Cause filings directly into the court’s reporting system and has refused with Judge CraigU. Dana and William Hinkes, Esq. court orders issued in the Township of Green denied me access toany Borough of Stanhope Record as Richard Stein even threatened my wife Kathryn and his municipalclerk as she signed an OPRA request in her own hand wile she was with the OPRA custodian and at-tempted to reduce her federal taxes by paying her Borough of Stanhope taxes in advance but was re-fused and retaliated against her and myself.

46. As questioned by Judge Dana, J.M.C. in a question the court gave the corrupt attorney RichardStein, Esq. in the township of Green’s municipal court on cases transferred from the Borough of Stan-hope to the jurisdiction of the township of Green in violation of State of NJ court rules and violation ofmy due process rights stated on the court Record of Apr 4, 2103 for subject docket as the court orderswere: Pay your taxes, water bill and sear bill and you can make 911 calls only. QUESTION: Can any-one pay their taxes in advance? Response: Richard Stein, Esq. the municipal Prosecutor and BoroughAttorney for Stanhope for over 30 years: Yes except Mr Caggiano defying even Judge Dana’s court or-der to his face.

47. Kay Mack a witness who has reported the corruption of court and Prosecutor officials was in-formed and told Judge N. Peter Conforti, J.S.C. in chambers with another representative of the Sussexcounty prosecutor’s office that the Chief of Police fro the Borough of Stanhope threatened me with im-mediate jailing as I had returned to Stanhope from our new home in North Las Vegas, NV to review myown court records and complaints field against me in the Borough of Stanhope’s jurisdiction and wasthreatened with immediate jailing as I was now an out-of-state citizen. As a result of the continuous re-taliation against my family and others for over 12 years my wife who suffers from the years of mentaltorment refuses to even allow me to enter the infested corrupt State of New Jersey for as stated by alead person in the FBI in Newark previously New Jersey was the most corrupt State in the nation. I

confirm with 10 years of continuous in your face tyranny.

48. The Chief of Police in Stanhope as known to the Sussex Count Superior Court and a Sussex CountyProsecutor member and informed by the Criminal part scheduler Kay Mack as she was called immedi-ately and told Judge Conforti, J.S.C. that the Borough threatened me with being Jailed if I entered tothe Borough of Stanhope municipal court after the town administrator Richard Stewart attempted to getme access an thereafter he was fired in retribution with severance pay from his $106,000 job.

49. As I have been confronted in my Feb 13, 2014 letter to the FBI and other parties which is attachedat exhibit #1 and d with more corruption now in Las Vegas, NV reported to the staff of the Director ofthe Nevada Real Estate Division and published on http://thomascaggiano.com/nevada.

50. I have already filed a detailed request for adjournment based upon usual special circumstances con-sidering the totality of the circumstances as published on http://thomascaggiano.com.Based upon the foregoing and adopted referenced exhibits I request Judge Hansbury recuse himself asstated in the proposed court order.

51. Certification in lieu of oath

I certify the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any of the foregoing state-ments made by me are willfully false that I am subject to punishment.

Based upon this certification and factors above, I request Judge Hansbury, P.J.Ch recuse himself fromDockets SSX-C-1-13 and SSX-C-43-13.

Sincerely,

Thomas Caggiano Jul 26, 20144 enclosures as stated and

5 encl. Feb 13, 2014 letter to FBI, Department of Justice OIG, Department of Agriculture’s SussexCounty Soil Conservation District and Dolan and Dolan PA attorney for the State of NJ, Borough ofStanhope Land Use Board and municipal prosecutor Joint municipal court of Wantage, Stillwater andBorough of Sussex with the corrupt magistrate Craig U. Dana, J.M.C. and excellent court administratorTania Ell who has preformed her public duty under 18 U.S.C. § 4 and reported apparent federal crimesto the FBI and State of NJ crimes to the State of NJ’s Office of Attorney General’s State Police OfficialCorruption Bureau for years and complied with the Codes of Ethics for judicial employees and herC.E.P.A. agreement with the State of New Jersey and oath of office.

6 encl. USPS Confirmation of complaint: mail fraud, money laundering, harassment

7. DOJ Sep 28, 2012 directive to report violations of 18 USC § 241, 242, 1513 et al to FBI Las Ve-gas, Nevada

Thomas CaggianoPro Se7086 Arcadia Glen CourtNorth Las Vegas, Nv 8984web: thomascaggaino.comemail:thomascaggiano@gmail.comPh 702-586-668Cell 973-945-0486___________________________________________SUSSEX COUNTY | SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEYBOARD of CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, | CHANCERY DIVISION: GENERAL EQUITYSUSSEX COUNTY COUNSEL MC CONNELL | PART - SUSSEX COUNTYSUSSEX COUNTY SHERIFF STRADA, |BOARD of CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS’ CLERK | Consolidated Docket No. SSX-C-43-13ELAINE MORGAN | No. SSX-C-01-13

Plaintiffs |vs. | Civil Action

| Disqualify Hon. S. Hansbury, P.J.ChTHOMAS CAGGIANO, | Proof of Service

Defendant. || R. 1:5-4. Service by Mail

|||

TOWNSHIP OF GREEN ||

vs. ||

THOMAS CAGGIANO, ||

Defendant. |_________________________________________|_____________________________________

I, Thomas Caggiano, do hereby certify on Jul 27, 2014, I mailed by certified mail receipt with return re-ceipt with tracking numbers 7014-0510-0001-8455-8728 Kevin Kelly, Esq. and 70140051-0001-8455-8735 Denise Lenard, Esq. the letter brief with enclosures and proposed court order to have Hon. S.Hansbury, P.J.Ch disqualify himself per my motion per Court rule R. R. 1-12:1(g) were mailed Jul 27,2014

Notice of subject filing was previously provided.

Thomas Caggiano Jul 27, 2014

___________________________________________SUSSEX COUNTY | SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEYBOARD of CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, | CHANCERY DIVISION: GENERAL EQUITYSUSSEX COUNTY COUNSEL MC CONNELL | PART - SUSSEX COUNTYSUSSEX COUNTY SHERIFF STRADA, |BOARD of CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS’ CLERK | Consolidated Docket No. SSX-C-43-13ELAINE MORGAN | No. SSX-C-01-13

Plaintiffs |vs. | Civil Action

|THOMAS CAGGIANO, | ORDER

Defendant. || Recusal

|||

TOWNSHIP OF GREEN ||

vs. ||

THOMAS CAGGIANO, ||

Defendant. |_________________________________________|_____________________________________

Upon motion by the defendant for the recusal of Hon. Stephen Hansbury, P.J. Ch and for good causehaving been shown, I hereby recuse myself.

________________________________Stephan Hasnbury, P.J. Ch