The material presented here is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. EEC-0813570. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, nor of Iowa State University.
Results & Discussion
Base catalyzed glucose/fructose isomerizationThrust 3: Chemical Catalyst DesignSarah Curry, Participant in the 2014 CBiRC RET; Jack Carraher; Chelsea Fleitman; Alex Liu; Jean-Philippe Tessonnier
Iowa State University
Project Rationale & Goals
What: Production of fructose from glucose
Why: Fructose is a feedstock chemical for the production of
biomass-derived commodity chemicals
Current Methods:
In Industry, enzymes are used to catalyze isomerization of glucose to fructose using High Fructose Corn Syrup process
• Expensive catalyst, slow process, sensitive to conditions
Solid acid catalyzed isomerization (Moliner, 2010) utilizing tin-beta zeolite
• Expensive catalyst, difficult to synthesize
Objective:
Develop inexpensive, environmentally friendly, and efficient method for conversion of glucose to fructose
Utilizing triethylamine in base catalyzed reaction
Conclusions
Identified mechanism scheme for glucose isomerization
• Determined optimum conditions for fructose formation
• Identified fructose decomposition pathways
Obtained 33% fructose
• (Enzyme: 41% yield)
• ~ 50 times faster than enzyme method
• More cost effective
Future: Develop heterogeneous catalyst that meets the optimization
criteria for isomerization
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the TessonnierResearch Group for guidance and mentoring, as well as , Adah Leshem, Stacy Renfro, Diana Loutsch, Maureen Griffin, Craig Walter, and Eric Hall for organizing the 2014 CBiRC RET Program.
0
20
40
60
80
100
9 10 11 12
Glucose ConsumptionFructose SelectivityFructose Yield
Pro
gre
ss o
f R
ea
ctio
n
Exp
resse
d a
s %
Initial pH
Extent of reaction as a function of pH
Materials & Methods
Hot Oil Bath Reaction
• Prepare aqueous solution of glucose and control the pH by adding a base• Purge the samples under argon gas to remove any carbon dioxide• Heat samples of the solution in an oil bath for set time intervals• Quench reaction with ice bath, then proceed to the dilution phase for analysis
Running reaction in hot oil bath Post-reaction vials; removed at 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, and 15 minutes.
Sample Analysis
• Dilute samples and analyze with UPLC
Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography unit UPLC chromatogram showing fructose and glucose peaks.
Fru
cto
se
Glu
cose
LS
U
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
Minutes
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
[Glu
cose
] / M
Time / sec
Concentration of Glucose
as a Function of Time (100 oC)
Maximum yields of fructose are obtained in the
pH range of 10 - 12
Consumes more glucose at higher pH
Production of fructose complicated
by simultaneous decomposition
Activation parameters for fructose formation and decay:
Reaction DH‡ / kJ mol-1 DS‡ / J mol-1 K-1 DG‡ / kJ mol-1
@ 100 oC
Formation 84 ± 7 -70 ± 20 110
Unimolecular RXN 153 115 110
Bimolecular RXN 15 -250 109
Kinetic maximum yield of fructose from glucose
DG‡formation / (ΣDG‡) × 100
110 / (110 + 110 + 109) × 100 = 33 %
‡ ‡ ‡
‡
‡
‡
0
2 10-3
4 10-3
6 10-3
8 10-3
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Fructose decay rate constant
vs [Frucotose], 100 oC, pH 11
ko
bs /
s-1
[Fructose] / M
Unimolecular Reaction
Two pathways identified by which fructose
is consumed
* Moliner, M. et al. Tin-containing zeolites are highly active catalysts for the isomerization of glucose in water. PNAS. 2010, 107, 6164-6168.
Time in minutes
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Concentration of Fructose
as a Function of Time (100 oC)
pH 9.5pH 10.2pH 10.5pH 10.7pH 10.9pH 11.0pH 11.1pH 11.3pH 11.5
[Fru
cto
se
] /
M
Time / sec