+ All Categories
Home > Health & Medicine > Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

Date post: 19-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: changezkn
View: 824 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
Popular Tags:
68
Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success Vinay Vaidya, MD -Assistant Professor Pediatrics -Director, Pediatric Critical Care Fellowship Program University of Maryland School of Medicine
Transcript
Page 1: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

Vinay Vaidya, MD-Assistant Professor Pediatrics

-Director, Pediatric Critical Care Fellowship Program University of Maryland School of Medicine

Page 2: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

2

Some questions

• How common is Diabetes / Hyperglycemia in hospitalized patient ?

• Is Hyperglycemia Bad? • Is Normoglycemia Good? • What’s the pathophysiologic basis?• How is Tight Glycemic Control (TGC) achieved ?• What’s going on in ICU’s at UMMS? • Challenges in implementing TGC?• What’s going on in the PICU? • Anesthesia implications ?• Future directions?

Page 3: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

3

Diabetes is common in Hospitals

• 9.5% of all hospital discharges, fourth most common co-morbid diagnosis in all discharges.

• 29% of cardiac surgery patients • 2-4 fold increase in rates of hospitalizations• Increases length of stay by 1-3 days

Page 4: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

4

Incidence of Hyperglycemia in ICU’s

• More than 80 to 90% of ICU patients will have a blood sugar > 126 mg/dl and approximately 60% will NOT BE KNOW DIABETICS

• 98.7% of 1548 patients BS > 110 mg/dl (Van den Berghe study, 2001)

Page 5: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

5

Is Hyperglycemia bad?

Page 6: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

6

Not really! by Conventional logic …

• Physiologically stress = Hyperglycemia

• Hyperglycemia = Marker of illness severity

• Not implicated in directly contributing to morbidity & mortality

• Largely ignored & untreated unless BS > ? 200 mg/dl

Page 7: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

7

Let’s look at the evidence ..

Page 8: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

8

Hyperglycemia in hospitalized pts

Umpierrez et al J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002

• 2030 patients on general floor

• Prevalence: 38%

• 10 fold increased mortality (16% vs 1.7%) if BS > 126 mg/dl

• 2 fold Length of Stay

• Higher admission to ICU

• Increased infection risk

Page 9: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

9

Hyperglycemia & Acute MI Capes et al. Lancet. 2000

• Meta-analysis of 15 studies (BG >110 mg/dL with or without a prior diagnosis of diabetes

• increased in-hospital mortality

• Increased CHF

Page 10: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

10

Hyperglycemia in Cardiac Surgery Patients

Furnary, Circulation 1999 Zerr, Ann Thorac Surg 1997

• Hyperglycemia associated with increased– mortality – deep wound infections– overall infection

• Hyperglycemia, on postop day 1 & 2 = single most important predictor of serious infectious complications.

Page 11: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

11

Hyperglycemia & Stroke Capes et al, Stroke 2001Kiers et al, J Neuro Neurosurg Psych 1992

• Meta-analysis of 26 studies on stroke: Increased mortality levels in non-diabetics with hyperglycemia

• Stroke survivors: BS range 120-145 mg/dl: Worse functional recovery.

• Patients with known diabetes and/or newly-discovered hyperglycemia (>140 mg/dl) more severe strokes with greater mortality

Page 12: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

12

High BS is Bad, Is Higher Bader?Krinsley, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2003

• 1,826 ICU patients

• direct and proportional correlation with BS

• BS range from < 100 to > 300: Mortality 10% to 43%

• Even modest hyperglycemia associated with a substantial increase in mortality in patients with a wide range of medical and surgical diagnoses

Page 13: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

13

Pregnancy & Hyperglycemia

• It is well-known that pregnancy complicated by uncontrolled diabetes results in poor fetal outcomes

Page 14: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

14

Pediatric evidence …1

• 50% of 353 critically ill children had initial glucose >120 mg/dL ()– Ruiz Magro P, et al [Metabolic changes in critically ill children]. An Esp

Pediatr 1999;51:143-8

Page 15: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

15

Pediatric evidence …2 Hyperglycemia (>126 mg/dl)

Very Common:

86%

MORTALITYHigher peak &

longer duration of

Hyperglycemia in Non-survivors

Page 16: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

16

Pediatric evidence …35.7 times

more likely to DIE

for highest BS > 120 mg/dl in first

10 days

Hyperglycemia (>120 mg/dl)

Very Common:

75%

Page 17: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

17

Yes, Hyperglycemia =

Page 18: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

18

If HYPERGLYCEMIA is bad …

Is NORMOGLYCEMIA good?

Page 19: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

19

The Case for Normglycemia / Tight Glyemic control (TGC)

Page 20: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

20

1921–Face of Insulin

Millions of diabetic lives saved ..

Page 21: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

21

Face of Insulin: today

? Millions of Non-diabetic lives too ?

Page 22: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

22

DIGAMI trialDiabetes and Insulin-Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Malmberg et al Circulation. 1999

• 620 diabetic patients with acute MI

• 306 randomly assigned patients to intensive insulin therapy &

• 314 to routine antidiabetic

• 3.5 year follow-up

• significantly reduced long-term mortality (33% vs. 44%)

Page 23: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

23

2001

Page 24: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

24

• 1548 Surgical ICU pts• TREATMENT GROUP:

– target 80 to 110 mg/dl • CONTROL group:

– target 180 to 200 mg/dL. • Stopped because of

significant reduction in mortality

Page 25: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

25

42% reduced Mortalit

y

Page 26: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

26

IIT Reductions in Morbidity

41%

46%

44%

25%

35%

35%

Transfusions: 50%

Page 27: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

27

Portland Diabetic ProjectFurnary et al. 2004, Endocr Pract

• 17-year prospective, NON randomized 4864 patients with diabetes + open-heart surgery

• Increasing BS levels directly associated with– death, – deep sternal wound infections (DSWI), – length of hospital stay (LOS), and – hospital cost.

• Continuous INSULIN, target BS < 150 mg/dL for 3- post op days, reduced …– death by 57% – DSWI by 66%, – (P<0.0001 for both)

Page 28: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

28

Connecticut StudyKrinsley JS: Mayo Clin Proc, 2004

• 800 patients from a medical surgical ICU• Target BS < 140 mg/dl• Mortality decreased 29% • LOS in ICU decreased 11%• Renal insufficiency diminished by 75%• Transfusions patients decreased by 19%• No increase in nurse staffing• No significant increase in hypoglycemia

occurred (0.35 vs. 0.34%).

Page 29: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

29

Is it really true?

Page 30: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

30

Pathophysiologic Basis

Page 31: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

31

Detrimental effects of Hyperglycemia

• impairs immune function– neutrophil function is reduced, – complement binding is attenuated,– monocyte phagocytic function is

disrupted PMN defect

• proinflammatory & prothrombotic• cells membranes are altered

Page 32: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

32

Pathophysiologic basis for benefitsInsulin ..

• regulates vasomotor function and contractility of the myocardium

• stimulates nitric oxide production,

• improves endothelial function

• lowers cytokines

• improves protein balance and fat metabolism

Page 33: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

33

• complementary or synergistic

• overall improvements in immune, hemodynamic, and metabolic functions

InfusingInsulin

Lowering BS

Page 34: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

34

So What’s the catch?

How tight is too tight?

Page 35: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

35

Hypoglycemia

Page 36: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

36

Hypoglycemia

• Incidence– Van den Berghe 0.05% vs 0.007%– Krinsley: 0.35 vs. 0.34%

• Prevention– abrupt interruption of Dextrose or continuous

feeds– monitoring

• Treatment• Risk-benefit ratio

Page 37: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

37

Implementing (TGC)

Page 38: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

38

TGC: Principles

• Insulin: Intravenous & continuous

• BS monitoring: hourly at least initially

• Essentially Nurse-led

• Adjustment protocol based not prn

• … and then, no two protocols are like

Page 39: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

39

Page 40: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

40

Complexity & variability of Published Protocol

• Nine protocols reviewed • From 27 to 800 patients. • Target: 80-110 mg/dL, to 126-207 mg/dL• Titration: based only on current BS level, OR

current & previous BS, insulin sensitivity and concurrent nutrition.

• Insulin adjustments: Units or % of previous dose• BS checks: hourly, but varied in subsequent

frequency • Mean time to achieve target 2 to 15 hours. • Hypoglycemia threshold: from 40 to 70 mg/dl

Page 41: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

41

Insulin Protocols: Bottom line

Page 42: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

42So what’s happening at UMMS?

SICU 19 beds

Neuro ICU 10 beds

CT ICU 12 beds

Multitrauma ICU 12 beds

Neurotrauma ICU 12 beds

MICU 10 to 29 beds

CCU 15 beds

PICU 10

8 ICU’s

100 ICU beds!

Page 43: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

43

UMMS: Tight Glycemic Control

• Multidisciplinary team

• UMMS protocol: couple of years

• Implementation attempted …….

• Let’s look at the protocol

Page 44: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

44

UMMS Challenges

• Badia Faddoul, RN, Dept of Clinical Effectiveness

Page 45: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

45

What’s going on in the PICU?

• Before July 11, 2005• NOTHING!

• After July 8, 2005• A LOT!• Approached to

develop a computer version

• July 8: Multidisciplinary team

• July 9, 10: Movie tickets

• July 11th prototype & first patient

Page 46: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

46

Page 47: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

47

PICU: Glucose Optimizer pilot ..

• First patient experience – Over 60 days, – over 1500 Protocol manipulations– More than 15 nurses– Minimal orientation of first few nurses– Cruise control– Even travelling nurses, relatively new nurses– Demo program– In actual use

Page 48: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

48

Anesthesia & TGC

Anestheisa Implications

Page 49: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

49

Intraoperative Glycemia

• Paucity of published studies– Hyperinsulinemic clamp

• 2004, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists: inpatient & peri-operative guidelines, ASA input

• 110 mg/dl as the upper limit during the perioperative period.

• American College of Endocrinology Position Statement on Inpatient Diabetes and Metabolic Control. Endocrine Practice. 2004; 10(1):77-82.

Page 50: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

50

Future

• Address hyperglycemia research on many fronts

• National online survey

• Comparative study: Paper vs computerized

• Hospital wide implementation: Intranet

• Extremely rapid implementation cycle in other hospitals, locally, nationally

Page 51: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

51

Future directions

• Palm pilot based program

• Integrating program with Glucometer

• Web-based nursing in-service & competancy

• Will intra-op TGC improve outcomes

• Randomized study in PICU

Page 52: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

52

This ICU has not yet implemented tight glucose control!

Until then, please pardon the inconvenience of our 40% increased Mortality Rate!

Page 53: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

53

We have come a long way !

Best & Banting, 1921

… Gluc. Optimizer

2005

Berghe 2001

Page 54: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

54

• A spoonful of sugar makes the ….– mortality go up– infections go up– ICU stay go up– transfusions go up– polyneuropathy– dialysis go up– ventilators go up– costs go up– ……..

Page 55: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

55

Some answers

•Hyperglycemia is v. common•Hyperglycemia IS Bad•Normoglycemia IS Good •Tight Glycemic Control can be achieved •We will take the challenge of implementation at UMMS •Lot’s going on in the PICU•Future is exciting

Page 56: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

56

Thank you !

Page 57: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

57

References

• Finney, SJ, et al. Glucose control & mortality in critically ill patients. JAMA 290:15, 2003.

• McGowen, KC, et al. Stress induced hyperglycemia. Critical Care Clinics 17:1, 2001.

• Montori, VM, et al. Hyperglycemia in acutely ill patients. JAMA 288:17, 2002.

• Van den Berghe, G. Insulin therapy for the critically ill patient. Clinical Cornerstone 5:2, 2003.

• Van den Berghe, G, et al. Outcome benefit of intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill: Insulin dose vs. glycemic control. Critical Care Medicine 31:2, 2003.

Page 58: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

58

Page 59: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

59

Page 60: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

60

1921 to 2001

Page 61: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

61

Page 62: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

62

Page 63: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

63

C254H377N65O76S6

Page 64: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

64

• 3,500 diabetic patients, CABG, – 57% decrease in mortality – significant decrease in major infectious

complications • Furnary AP et al. Continuous insulin infusion reduces mortality in

patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003

Page 65: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

65

Page 66: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

66

Perioperative outcomes in cardiac surgery patients

• Intraoperative hyperglycemia is an independent risk factor for complications, including death, after cardiac surgery

• Gandhi et al, Mayo Clin Proc. 2005

Page 67: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

67

Hyperglycemia in ICU

• Metabolic changes in response to stress of illness

insulin secretion stress hormones (cortisol,

catecholamines, GH, glucagon) cytokines (TNFα , IL-1)• Results in gluconeogenesis,

glycogenolysis, lipolysis, proteolysis

Page 68: Tight Glycemic Control: Implementation, the key to success

68

Causes of…

INSULINRESISTANCE• Pressors• Corticosteroids• Sepsis• Uremia• Cirrhosis• Obesity• Bed rest

INSULINDEFICIENCY• Advanced age• Hypothermia• Hypoxemia• DM• Pancreatitis


Recommended