+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ......

Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ......

Date post: 08-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: dangminh
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
4/27/2015 1 Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Mercy Diabetes Center Janesville, WI Entity Activity Financial Consideration Comments Novo Nordisk Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria Sanofi-Aventis Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria Janssen Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria Lilly Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria
Transcript
Page 1: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

1

Timothy S. Reid, M.D.Mercy Diabetes Center

Janesville, WI

Entity Activity Financial Consideration Comments

Novo Nordisk Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria

Sanofi-Aventis Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria

Janssen Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria

BoehringerIngelheim/Lilly

Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria

Lilly Speaker/Consultant Speaker Fees/Honoraria

Page 2: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

2

Our understanding of diabetes continues to evolve, the number of tools that we have continue to grow and the environment in

which we care for our patients continues to change…..

we have to keep up.

Individualize treatment goals for patients with T2DM that reflect the degree of hyperglycemia, co-morbid conditions, disease duration and responses to therapy

Examine the importance of customizing HgBA1c goals based on individual patient characteristics

Discuss provider-related and patient-related barriers to use of insulin and GLP-1 therapies in the management of T2DM

Analyze the safety and efficacy of current and emerging therapies, including insulin and GLP-1 therapies, for achieving glycemic and HgBA1c target goals in type 2 diabetes

Identify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin therapy according to current guidelines

Summarize

Page 3: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

3

Evolve

http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/national-diabetes-report-web.pdf

Evolve

https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/publications/p4/p43084.pdf

Page 4: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

4

http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/slides/maps_diabetes_trends.pdf

Estimated Diabetes Costs in the United States, 2012

Total (Direct and Indirect$245 Billion

Direct Medical Costs$176 Billion

After adjusting for population age and sex differences, average medical expenditures among people with diagnosed diabetes were 2.3 times higher than people without diabetes.

Indirect Costs$69 Billion

(disability, work loss, premature death)

http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/national-diabetes-report-web.pdf

Cost

Page 5: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

5

Cost

Cost to Patient:• Time• Burden of Therapy• Food Cost• Family Involvement• Emotion/Stress

Cost to Family/Support:• Time• Home Modifications• Meal Quality/Timing• Changes in Activity• Emotion/Stress

Cost to Care Team:• Time• Complexity of Care• Administrative

Burdens

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes - 2015

Patient Centeredness

Diabetes Across The Lifespan

Advocacy for Patients with Diabetes

Page 6: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

6

Individualized Care

Approach to the management of Hyperglycemia

Approach to the management of Hyperglycemia

Patient/Disease FeaturesPatient/Disease FeaturesA1c 7%A1c 7% Less

stringentLess

stringentMore stringentMore stringent

Usually Not ModifiableUsually Not Modifiable

PotentiallyModifiablePotentiallyModifiable

Risks potentially associated with hypoglycemia and other drug adverse events

Risks potentially associated with hypoglycemia and other drug adverse events

Disease DurationDisease Duration

Life ExpectancyLife Expectancy

Important ComorbiditiesImportant Comorbidities

Established Vascular ComplicationsEstablished Vascular Complications

Patient Attitude and expected treatment effortsPatient Attitude and expected treatment efforts

Resources and Support SystemResources and Support System

lowlow highhigh

Newly diagnosedNewly diagnosed long-standinglong-standing

longlong shortshort

absentabsent severeseverefew/mildfew/mild

few/mildfew/mildabsentabsent severesevere

Highly motivated.adherent, excellent self-care capacitiesHighly motivated.adherent, excellent self-care capacities

Less motivated, non-adherent, poor self care capacities

Less motivated, non-adherent, poor self care capacities

Readily availableReadily available

limitedlimited

Approach to the management of Hyperglycemia

Patient/Disease FeaturesA1c 7% Less

stringentMore stringent

Usually Not Modifiable

PotentiallyModifiable

Risks potentially associated with hypoglycemia and other drug adverse events

Disease Duration

Life Expectancy

Important Comorbidities

Established Vascular Complications

Patient Attitude and expected treatment efforts

Resources and Support System

low high

Newly diagnosed long-standing

long short

absent severefew/mild

few/mildabsent severe

Highly motivated.adherent, excellent self-care capacities

Less motivated, non-adherent, poor self care capacities

Readily available

limited

American Diabetes Association. Summary of Revisions. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care 2015;38(suppl.1):S37.

Page 7: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

7

Resources Life Expectancy

Hypoglycemic Tolerance

Drug:DrugInteractionsPolypharmacy

Health Literacy

Co-morbid Conditions

<7% >8%

vs.vs.Patient

Expectation of Control

Patient Less Willing to Control

Few Co-morbid

Conditions

Many Co-morbid

Conditionsvs.vs.Long Life Short Lifevs.vs.Hypoglycemia Hyperglycemiavs.vs.

Page 8: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

8

Lifestyle Modification Dietary Management Exercise Weight Loss

Page 9: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

9

Healthy eating, wt. control, increased physical activity & diabetes education

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. InStandards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41-S48.

Diabetes Self-Management Education◦ improved diabetes knowledge◦ improved self-care behavior ◦ improved clinical outcomes lower A1C lower self-reported weight improved quality of life healthy coping lower costs

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care 2015;38(Suppl. 1):S20-S21.

Pharmacologic Therapy for Type 2 DM◦ Metformin is preferred if tolerated and not

contraindicated◦ Consider Insulin if symptomatic or blood sugars

high◦ Advance therapy q3 months if not at goal◦ Patient centered approach to therapy◦ T2DM is progressive. Insulin therapy will eventually

be needed in most cases

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care 2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41-S48.

Page 10: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

10

Healthy eating, wt. control, increased physical activity & diabetes educationMetformin

High EfficacyLow Hypoglycemic Risk

Weight NeutralLactic Acidosis/GI intolerance

Low Cost

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of monotherapy, proceed to 2-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease specific factors).

Efficacy……………………Hypo Risk………………..Weight………………..…..Side Effects………….…..Cost…………………….…

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. InStandards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41-S48.

Healthy eating, wt. control, increased physical activity & diabetes educationMetformin

High EfficacyLow Hypoglycemic Risk

Weight NeutralLactic Acidosis/GI intolerance

Low Cost

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of monotherapy, proceed to 2-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease specific factors).

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

Efficacy……………………Hypo Risk………………..Weight………………..…..Side Effects………….…..Cost…………………….…

High….……………….Moderate risk……….gain…………….……..hypoglycemia……….Low.……………………

high………………….low Risk……………..Gain………………….Edema,CHF,Fx’s……Low…………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk.…………….neutral………………..rare……………………high……………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk………………losing…………………GU, dehydration…….high……………………

high…………….…….Low risk………………losing………………..GI………………….….high……………………

HighestHigh riskgainhypoglycemiavariable

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of dual therapy, proceed to 3-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease-specific factors).

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Efficacy…………………Hypo Risk……………..Weight……………..…..Side Effects……….…..Cost………………….…

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. InStandards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41-S48.

Page 11: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

11

Healthy eating, wt. control, increased physical activity & diabetes educationMetformin

High EfficacyLow Hypoglycemic Risk

Weight NeutralLactic Acidosis/GI intolerance

Low Cost

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of monotherapy, proceed to 2-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease specific factors).

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

Efficacy……………………Hypo Risk………………..Weight………………..…..Side Effects………….…..Cost…………………….…

High….……………….Moderate risk……….gain…………….……..hypoglycemia……….Low.……………………

high………………….low Risk……………..Gain………………….Edema,CHF,Fx’s……Cost…………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk.…………….neutral………………..rare……………………high……………………

Efficacy……………….Hypo Risk…………….Weight………………..Side Effects………….Cost……………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk………………losing…………………GU, dehydration…….high……………………

high…………….…….Low risk………………losing………………..GI………………….….high……………………

HighestHigh riskgainhypoglycemiavariable

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of dual therapy, proceed to 3-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease-specific factors).

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

SGLT-2 i

SU

TZD

SGLT-2 i

Insulin

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of triple therapy and patient (1) on oral combination, move to injectables; (2) on GLP- RA, add basal insuin; or (3) on optimally titrated basal insulin, add GLP-1 RA or mealtime insulin. In refractory patients,

consider adding TZD or SGLT-2i:

Insulin

SU

DPP-4 i

SGLT-2 i

GLP-1 RA

SU

TZD

InsulinDPP-4 i

SU

TZD

Insulin

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

Insulin

SGLT-2 i

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. InStandards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41-S48.

Healthy eating, wt. control, increased physical activity & diabetes educationMetformin

High EfficacyLow Hypoglycemic Risk

Weight NeutralLactic Acidosis/GI intolerance

Low Cost

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of monotherapy, proceed to 2-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease specific factors).

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

Efficacy……………………Hypo Risk………………..Weight………………..…..Side Effects………….…..Cost…………………….…

High….……………….Moderate risk……….gain…………….……..hypoglycemia……….Low.……………………

high………………….low Risk……………..Gain………………….Edema,CHF,Fx’s……Cost…………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk.…………….neutral………………..rare……………………high……………………

Efficacy……………….Hypo Risk…………….Weight………………..Side Effects………….Cost……………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk………………losing…………………GU, dehydration…….high……………………

high…………….…….Low risk………………losing………………..GI………………….….high……………………

HighestHigh riskgainhypoglycemiavariable

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of dual therapy, proceed to 3-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease-specific factors).

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

SGLT-2 i

SU

TZD

SGLT-2 i

Insulin

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of triple therapy and patient (1) on oral combination, move to injectables; (2) on GLP- RA, add basal insuin; or (3) on optimally titrated basal insulin, add GLP-1 RA or mealtime insulin. In refractory patients,

consider adding TZD or SGLT-2i:

Insulin

SU

DPP-4 i

SGLT-2 i

GLP-1 RA

SU

TZD

InsulinDPP-4 i

SU

TZD

Insulin

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

Insulin

SGLT-2 i

Insulin (basal) + or GLP-1 RAMealtime Insulin

Metformin+

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. InStandards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41-S48.

Page 12: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

12

The Good:◦ Structured way to think about the therapy available

for glucose control The Bad: ◦ They do not adequately address patient population

with significant co-morbid conditions The Ugly:◦ They give no direction regarding when to

discontinue medication ◦ Potentially promote poly-pharmacy

With apologies to Clint Eastwood…….

9 classes of oral medication 4 classes of subcutaneous medications New classes coming…..

Page 13: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

13

HTN and Diabetes Drug Classes in the US over the past 90 Years

Num

ber

of M

edic

atio

n C

lass

es

1

2

3

4

7

6

5

8

10

9

12

11

1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s

Insulin Sulfonylureas

(Phenformin)Withdrawn

1978Biguanides

-glucosidase Inhibitors

Thiazolidinediones

Meglitinides

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Amylinomimetics

DPP-4 Receptor Antagonists

Bile Acid Sequestrants

Dopamine Agonists

SGLT-2 InhibitorsRenin Inhibitors

Calcium Channel Blockers

ACE Inhibitors

Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers

Peripheral -1 Blockers

-blockers

Central -2 Agonists

DiureticsAdrenergic

neuronal blockers

Vasodialators

metformin

glimepiride

glyburide pioglitazone

acarbose

miglitol

colesevelamlinagliptin

rosiglitazone

sitagliptin

saxagliptin

nateglinide

bromocriptine

Oral Antihyperglycemic Agents

repaglinide

glipizide

canagliflozin

alogliptindapagliflozin

empagliflozin

Page 14: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

14

Acarbose Miglitol Bromocriptine Colesevelam Glimepiride Glipizide Glybruide Metformin

Nateglinide Repaglinide Pioglitazone Rosiglitazone Alogliptin Linagliptin Saxagliptin Sitagliptin Canagliflozin Dapagliflozin Emapgliflozin

DeFronzo RA. Diabetes. 2009. 58 (4): 773-795.

GLP-1

GLP-1

GLP-1

GLP-1

GLP-1

InsulinInsulin

Insulin

Insulin

Insulin

Insulin

Insulin

Page 15: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

15

asdf

Class Generic Name Trade Nameα-glucosidase Inhibitor acarobose, miglitol Precose, Glyset

amylinomimetics amylin Symlin

biguanides metformin Glucophage, Riomet

Bile Acid Sequestrants colesevelam WelChol

Dopamine Agonists bromocriptine Cycloset

DPP-4i alogliptin, linagliptinsaxagliptin, sitagliptin

Nesina, TradjentaOnglyza, Januvia

GLP-1 Agonists albiglutide, dulaglutideexenatide, liraglutide

Tanzeum, Trulicity, ByettaVictoza

Glucagon glucagon Glucagon

Insulin insulin (various) Humulin, Novolin, Humalog, Novolog, Apidra, Lantus, Levemir

meglitinides nateglinide, repaglinide Starlix, Prandin

SGLT-2i canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin Invokana, Farxiga, Jardiance

Sulfonylureas glimepiride, glipizide glyburide Amaryl, Glucotrol, Diabeta, Micronase

Thiazolidinediones pioglitazone, rosiglitazone Actos, Avandia

Insulin Secretion

HepaticGlucose

Production

Pancreatic Glucagon Secretion

Peripheral

Glucose Uptake

GI CHO Absorption

Renal Reabsorp-tion

of Glucose

β-cell Function

-Glucosidase Inhibitor ✔

Biguanide ✔ ✔

Bromocriptine UnknownColesevelam Unknown

DPP-4 Inhibitor ✔ ✔

Improve*

Glinide✔

SGLT-2 Inhibitor ✔

SU✔ ✔

TZD✔ ✔ Improve

National Diabetes Education Program. Available at: http://www.ndep.nih.gov/media/Drug_tables_supplement.pdf Accessed August 10, 2010 . Nathan DM, et al. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:193-203. Rodbard HW, et al. Endocr Pract. 2009;15(6):540-559. Januvia [prescribing information]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc.; 2010. Onglyza [prescribing information]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.; 2009. Welchol [prescribing information]. Parsippany, NJ: Daiichi Sankyo Inc.; 2011.. Cycloset [prescribinginformation]. San Diego, CA: Santarus, Inc.; 2010.

* In vitro and rodent data; preliminary human data

Page 16: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

16

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Insulins◦ Human Regular NPH Mix

◦ Analogue Rapid Long Acting Mix

Pramlintide(Amylin analogue)

Page 17: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

17

Robust blood sugar reduction◦ A1c reductions 1.5-3.5%

Few toxicities◦ Hypersensitivities – typically related to excipients◦ Hypoglycemia – requires monitoring and management◦ Antibodies – clinical significance ?◦ Lipodystrophy◦ Edema

Few Drug:Drug Interactions◦ Most are changes in blood sugars, high or low

Delivery◦ Vial/Syringe◦ Pens◦ Pumps◦ Inhalation

Type GenericName

Brand Name Onset Peak Duration

Rapidaspart Novolog

10-30 minutes

30 min to 3 hours 3-5 hoursglulisine Apidra

lispro Humalog

Short regular various 30-60minutes

2-5 hours Up to 12 Hours

Intermediate NPH 1.5 to 4 Hours

4-12 Hours

Up to 24 Hours

Longdetemir Levemir 0.8 to 4

hoursMinimal

peakUp to 24

hoursglargine Lantus

http://www.joslin.org/info/insulin_a_to_z_a_guide_on_different_types_of_insulin.html (Accessed 3.20.2015)

Page 18: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

18

Healthy eating, wt. control, increased physical activity & diabetes educationMetformin

High EfficacyLow Hypoglycemic Risk

Weight NeutralLactic Acidosis/GI intolerance

Low Cost

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of monotherapy, proceed to 2-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease specific factors).

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

Efficacy……………………Hypo Risk………………..Weight………………..…..Side Effects………….…..Cost…………………….…

High….……………….Moderate risk……….gain…………….……..hypoglycemia……….Low.……………………

high………………….low Risk……………..Gain………………….Edema,CHF,Fx’s……Cost…………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk.…………….neutral………………..rare……………………high……………………

Efficacy……………….Hypo Risk…………….Weight………………..Side Effects………….Cost……………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk………………losing…………………GU, dehydration…….high……………………

high…………….…….Low risk………………losing………………..GI………………….….high……………………

HighestHigh riskgainhypoglycemiavariable

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of dual therapy, proceed to 3-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease-specific factors).

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

SGLT-2 i

SU

TZD

SGLT-2 i

Insulin

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of triple therapy and patient (1) on oral combination, move to injectables; (2) on GLP- RA, add basal insuin; or (3) on optimally titrated basal insulin, add GLP-1 RA or mealtime insulin. In refractory patients,

consider adding TZD or SGLT-2i:

Insulin

SU

DPP-4 i

SGLT-2 i

GLP-1 RA

SU

TZD

InsulinDPP-4 i

SU

TZD

Insulin

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

Insulin

SGLT-2 i

Insulin (basal) + or GLP-1 RAMealtime Insulin

Metformin+

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. InStandards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41-S48.

Healthy eating, wt. control, increased physical activity & diabetes educationMetformin

High EfficacyLow Hypoglycemic Risk

Weight NeutralLactic Acidosis/GI intolerance

Low Cost

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of monotherapy, proceed to 2-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease specific factors).

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

Efficacy……………………Hypo Risk………………..Weight………………..…..Side Effects………….…..Cost…………………….…

High….……………….Moderate risk……….gain…………….……..hypoglycemia……….Low.……………………

high………………….low Risk……………..Gain………………….Edema,CHF,Fx’s……Cost…………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk.…………….neutral………………..rare……………………high……………………

Efficacy……………….Hypo Risk…………….Weight………………..Side Effects………….Cost……………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk………………losing…………………GU, dehydration…….high……………………

high…………….…….Low risk………………losing………………..GI………………….….high……………………

HighestHigh riskgainhypoglycemiavariable

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of dual therapy, proceed to 3-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease-specific factors).

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

SGLT-2 i

SU

TZD

SGLT-2 i

Insulin

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of triple therapy and patient (1) on oral combination, move to injectables; (2) on GLP- RA, add basal insuin; or (3) on optimally titrated basal insulin, add GLP-1 RA or mealtime insulin. In refractory patients,

consider adding TZD or SGLT-2i:

Insulin

SU

DPP-4 i

SGLT-2 i

GLP-1 RA

SU

TZD

InsulinDPP-4 i

SU

TZD

Insulin

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

Insulin

SGLT-2 i

Insulin (basal) + or GLP-1 RAMealtime Insulin

Metformin+

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. InStandards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41-S48.

Page 19: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

19

CNS: Promotes satiety and reduction of appetite

cell: Stimulates glucose-dependent insulin secretion; Increases cell mass

cell: Inhibits glucagon secretion in a glucose- dependent fashion

Liver: Reduces hepatic glucose output by inhibiting glucagon release

Stomach: Slows gastric emptying times

Page 20: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

20

GLP-1Inactive

GLP-1 Actions

Mixed meal

GLPGLP-1Active

Plasma

IntestinalGLP-1release DPP-4

Excreted by kidneys

Rapid inactivation(>80% of pool)

DPP-4 = Dipeptidyl peptidase-4GLP-1 = Glucagon-like Peptide-1

Deacon CF, et al. Diabetes. 1995;44:1126-1131.

GLP-1Inactive

GLP-1 Actions

Mixed meal

GLPGLP-1Active

Plasma

IntestinalGLP-1release DPP-4

Excreted by kidneys

Rapid inactivation(>80% of pool)

DPP-4 = Dipeptidyl peptidase-4GLP-1 = Glucagon-like Peptide-1

Deacon CF, et al. Diabetes. 1995;44:1126-1131.

GLP-1 Agonists

DPP-4 Inhibitors

Page 21: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

21

Generic TradeDosing

ScheduleMixing

Required

Pre-injection waiting

time

DosingSmallest Needle

Size

Needles included

Use with basal

insulin

Auto Injector

AlbiglutideTanzeum

QW YesYes 15-30 minutes

30mg, 50mg

29-gauge, 5mm thin-

walled needle

Yes Yes No

Dulaglutide Trulicity QW No None0.75mg, 1.5mg

Built in to device

29g, 5 mm needle

Yes part of device

NoCurrently

studies are evaluating

Yes

Exenatide Byetta BID No None5mcg, 10mcg

32 gauge, 4mm

needleNo Yes No

Exenatideextended release

BydureonKit

QW Yes None 2mg23-gauge,

8mm needle

Yes

NoCurrently

studies are evaluating

No

Exenatideextended release

BydureonPen

QW Yes None 2mg23-gauge,

7mm needle

Yes

NoCurrently

studies are evaluating

No

Liraglutide Victoza QD No None.6, 1.2, 1.8mg

32 gauge, 4mm

needleYes Yes No

Generic TradeDosing

ScheduleMixing

Required

Pre-injection waiting

time

DosingSmallest Needle

Size

Needles included

Use with basal

insulin

Auto Injector

AlbiglutideTanzeum

QW YesYes 15-30 minutes

30mg, 50mg

29-gauge, 5mm thin-

walled needle

Yes Yes No

Dulaglutide Trulicity QW No None0.75mg, 1.5mg

Built in to device

29g, 5 mm needle

Yes part of device

NoCurrently

studies are evaluating

Yes

Exenatide Byetta BID No None5mcg, 10mcg

32 gauge, 4mm

needleNo Yes No

Exenatideextended release

BydureonKit

QW Yes None 2mg23-gauge,

8mm needle

Yes

NoCurrently

studies are evaluating

No

Exenatideextended release

BydureonPen

QW Yes None 2mg23-gauge,

7mm needle

Yes

NoCurrently

studies are evaluating

No

Liraglutide Victoza QD No None.6, 1.2, 1.8mg

32 gauge, 4mm

needleYes Yes No

Page 22: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

22

Generic TradeDosing

ScheduleMixing

Required

Pre-injection waiting

time

DosingSmallest Needle

Size

Needles included

Use with basal

insulin

Auto Injector

AlbiglutideTanzeum

QW YesYes 15-30 minutes

30mg, 50mg

29-gauge, 5mm thin-

walled needle

Yes Yes No

Dulaglutide Trulicity QW No None0.75mg, 1.5mg

Built in to device

29g, 5 mm needle

Yes part of device

NoCurrently

studies are evaluating

Yes

Exenatide Byetta BID No None5mcg, 10mcg

32 gauge, 4mm

needleNo Yes No

Exenatideextended release

BydureonKit

QW Yes None 2mg23-gauge,

8mm needle

Yes

NoCurrently

studies are evaluating

No

Exenatideextended release

BydureonPen

QW Yes None 2mg23-gauge,

7mm needle

Yes

NoCurrently

studies are evaluating

No

Liraglutide Victoza QD No None.6, 1.2, 1.8mg

32 gauge, 4mm

needleYes Yes No

Generic TradeDosing

ScheduleWeeks of

StudyA1c Reduction (Monotherapy) Fasting Blood Sugar Reduction

AlbiglutideTanzeum

QW 5230 mg = -0.7%50 mg = -0.9%

30 mg = -16 mg/dl50 mg = -25 mg/dl

Dulaglutide Trulicity QW 260.75mg = -0.7%1.5mg = -0.8%

0.75mg = -26mg/dl1.5mg = -29mg/dl

Exenatide Byetta BID 245 mcg = -0.7%10 mcg = -0.9%

5 mcg = -17mg/dl10 mcg = -19mg/dl

Exenatideextended release

BydureonKit

QW 24 2mg = -1.6% 2mg = -25 mg/dl

Exenatideextended release

BydureonPen

QW

Liraglutide Victoza QD 521.2 mg = -0.8%1.8 mg = -1.1%

1.2 mg = -15 mg/dl1.8 mg = -26 mg/dl

Page 23: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

23

Nausea and diarrhea are possible (early) Hypoglycemia more likely if used with

secretogogues Injection site reactions Pregnancy Category C Pancreatitis risk (low but identifiable) Risk of Thyroid C-cell Tumors Renal Precautions

Contraindications:◦ Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma◦ Hypersensitivity◦ Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (Type 2) Thyroid Parathyroid Adrenal

Page 24: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

24

More medications◦ Lixisenatide – once-daily injectable ◦ Oral GLP-1 – Eligen Technology using low molecular

weight compounds – increase lipophilicity1.◦ Combinations with Insulin – number of companies

working on this◦ Very Long Acting GLP-1’s - on the order of 3,6, and

12 months

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16305420 (Accessed 1/24/2015

Healthy eating, wt. control, increased physical activity & diabetes educationMetformin

High EfficacyLow Hypoglycemic Risk

Weight NeutralLactic Acidosis/GI intolerance

Low Cost

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of monotherapy, proceed to 2-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease specific factors).

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

Efficacy……………………Hypo Risk………………..Weight………………..…..Side Effects………….…..Cost…………………….…

High….……………….Moderate risk……….gain…………….……..hypoglycemia……….Low.……………………

high………………….low Risk……………..Gain………………….Edema,CHF,Fx’s……Cost…………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk.…………….neutral………………..rare……………………high……………………

Efficacy……………….Hypo Risk…………….Weight………………..Side Effects………….Cost……………………

Intermediate.……….Low risk………………losing…………………GU, dehydration…….high……………………

high…………….…….Low risk………………losing………………..GI………………….….high……………………

HighestHigh riskgainhypoglycemiavariable

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of dual therapy, proceed to 3-drug combination (order not meant to denote any specific preference – choice dependent on a variety of patient and disease-specific factors).

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Metformin+

Sulfonylurea Thiazolidinedione DPP-4 Inhibitor SGLT-2 Inhibitor GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

Insulin (basal)

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

SGLT-2 i

SU

TZD

SGLT-2 i

Insulin

If A1c target not achieved after ~3 months of triple therapy and patient (1) on oral combination, move to injectables; (2) on GLP- RA, add basal insuin; or (3) on optimally titrated basal insulin, add GLP-1 RA or mealtime insulin. In refractory patients,

consider adding TZD or SGLT-2i:

Insulin

SU

DPP-4 i

SGLT-2 i

GLP-1 RA

SU

TZD

InsulinDPP-4 i

SU

TZD

Insulin

TZD

DPP-4 i

GLP-1 RA

Insulin

SGLT-2 i

Insulin (basal) + or GLP-1 RAMealtime Insulin

Metformin+

American Diabetes Association. Approaches to glycemic treatment . Sec. 7. InStandards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care2015;38(Suppl. 1):S41-S48.

Page 25: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

25

Why?

The failure to initiate or intensify therapy in a defined time among patients who have not attained clinical goals and who would likely

benefit from intensification

Beckley ET. Doc News. 2006;3:4.

Page 26: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

26

Khunti K, et.al. Clinical Inertia in People with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013; 36:3411-3417..Khunti K, et.al. Clinical Inertia in People with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013; 36:3411-3417..

Intensification to Insulin

Years Mean A1c at Intensification

1 OAD 7.1y 8.7%

2 OADs 6.1y 9.1%

3 OADs 6.0y 9.7%

Retrospective cohort Study based on 81,573 people with T2DM between Jan 2004-Dec 2006

The failure to initiate or intensify therapy in a defined time among patients who have not attained clinical goals and who would likely

benefit from intensification

Beckley ET. Doc News. 2006;3:4.

Page 27: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

27

Physician Time Hypoglycemia Weight Inadequacy Futility

Patient Perceptions Aversions Physical Cultural

Koerbel G, Korytkowski M. Insulin-Therapy Resistance Practical Diabetology. June 2003:36-40.Magwire ML. Am J Ther. 2011;18:392-402.Koerbel G, Korytkowski M. Insulin-Therapy Resistance Practical Diabetology. June 2003:36-40.Magwire ML. Am J Ther. 2011;18:392-402.

Identify Personal Obstacles Restore Sense of Personal Control Enhance Self-Efficacy Address Emotional Issues Discuss the Risks of Hypoglycemia Discuss Injection Fears Reinforce the positive aspects of insulin use Refer patient for Diabetes Self Management

Education Provide Ongoing Support

Polonsky WH, et al. Clin Diabetes. 2004;22:147-50.Funnell MM. Clin Diabetes. 2007;25:36-8.

Funnell MM, et al. Diabetes Care. 2012;Suppl 1:S97-104.

Page 28: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

28

The Future

Now:◦ Inhaled Insulin◦ Concentrated Insulins

Future:◦ Glucokinase Activators◦ Ultra-Long Acting Insulins◦ Ultra-Rapid Acting Insulins◦ Biosimilar Insulins

Page 29: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

29

Garber AJ et al. Endocr Pract. 2013;19(Suppl 2):1-48.

Clinical Practice Guidelines can give us important insights into the management of our patients with T2DM

It is important to consider patient specific factors when choosing therapy for our patients

There are many newer classes of medication for T2DM, including GLP-1’s that need to be considered

There are important patient and provider barriers to identify when choosing subcutaneous/injection therapy for our patients

Page 30: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

30

Our understanding of diabetes continues to evolve, the number of tools that we have continue to grow and the environment in

which we care for our patients continues to change…..

we have to keep up.

Questions?

Page 31: Timothy S. Reid, M.D. Diabetes.pdfIdentify patients who are good candidates for GLP-1 or insulin ... The Ugly: They give no ... 1920’s 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s

4/27/2015

31

Timothy S. Reid, M.D.Mercy Diabetes Center

Janesville WI

[email protected]


Recommended