SMR Technology: EDF approach
Laurent Amice
Olivier Godon
Rio de Janeiro - Symposium new nuclear technologies
Sept 04, 2017
| 2
EDF GROUP AT GLANCE
EDF produces around 22% of the European Union’s electricity,
primarily from nuclear power:
37.1 million customers
154,845 employees
€650 million invested in
Research & Development 50% for nuclear R&D
Turnover in 2016: €71.2 billion 2016 data
| 3
EDF: THE WORLD'S LARGEST NUCLEAR OPERATOR
2016 data
73
35
25 22 21 20 16 15
11 11 10 9 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
OPERATING ORGANIZATIONS RANKED BY NUMBER OF REACTORS IN OPERATION
(2016)
Source: IAEA Reference Data Series No. 2, 2016 Edition; IAEA PRIS 2017
| 4
Affordable nuclear for power generation
Reduced investment per unit
Reduced Capital cost before generation of first MWh
Multi-unit financing scheme: first units financing the next units
Modular reactor, for simplified construction
Limited number of modules, manufactured in factories
Reduction of risks related to construction on site
Reduction of construction duration on site
Low power enabling simplified design with high level of safety
Simplified and compact architecture, limiting the accident initiators and scenarios
Low level of residual heat, simplified and passive safety systems
Versatility and flexibility
Flexible operation for power generation
Single to multi-SMRs facilities
SMR INTERESTS & EXPECTED BENEFITS
| 5
EDF INTEREST IN SMR
A proper response to high expectation
A relevant and affordable solution for new nuclear uses
New comers in nuclear, carbon free alternative to existing
fossil
Remote sites, isolated network, heat, steam and
desalination
Compatible and complementary with existing large
nuclear
Mid merit operation, complementary to large base nuclear
and intermittent renewable
As a world leader in nuclear technology and operation,
EDF is engaged to develop a valuable and competitive
SMR solution
| 6
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
SZC 1
SZC 2
EDF PORTFOLIO OF GEN III REACTORS
SMR
TSN1
TSN2
OL3
FA3 HPC 1
Feasibility studies and development
SINOP
Commercial Operation
Large size
Mid size
Small size
Feasibility study Project Delivery
Feasibility study Project Delivery
BRADWELL
HUALONG
HPC 2
| 7
SPECIFIC BREAKTHROUGHS TO CONSIDER
Standard design and international
licensing for worldwide deployment
Adapted regulatory requirements
In factory certification
Passive systems qualification
Mutualisation of systems and control room
Economic levers vs Scale effect
Modular design and manufacturing
(construction cost decrease, shortened
construction duration)
Series effect (In series production of
component, standardisation...)
Simplification of design (architecture,
components, regular civil structure, easy and
quick to build)
| 8
DISRUPTIVE SOLUTIONS RELYING ON EDF LARGE
EXPERIENCE
PWR Technology
The most mature, spread and near term technology
Relying on existing capacities (supply chain, fuel cycle industries)
NSSS integrated design Compact primary components located inside the
pressure vessel
Safety features
GEN III+, post FKS requirements
Resistance to hazards
Passive systems with large grace period
Severe accident management
Flexible and versatile
Flexible operation for power generation
Single to multi-SMRs facilities