+ All Categories
Home > Documents > TM 661 Engineering Economics

TM 661 Engineering Economics

Date post: 19-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: mavis
View: 26 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
TM 661 Engineering Economics. Replacement Analysis. Replacement / Challenge. Example Car grows older and needs repairs at engine overhaul time should we fix or replace?. Replacement / Challenge. Example Car grows older and needs repairs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
33
ENGM 661 Engineering Economics Replacement Analysis Replacement Analysis
Transcript
Page 1: TM 661  Engineering Economics

ENGM 661 Engineering Economics

Replacement AnalysisReplacement Analysis

Page 2: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement / Challenge

Example Car grows older and needs repairsat engine overhaul time should we fix or replace?

Page 3: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement / Challenge

Example Car grows older and needs repairsat engine overhaul time should we fix or replace?

Note: sunk costs are unrecoverable

Example Just put $800 in car, engine needs overhaul, should we repair or replace?The $800 just invested has no bearing number is not part of analysis.

Page 4: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Example: Replacement

Chemical Plant owns filter press purchased 3 yearsago. Operating expense started at $4,000 per year2 years ago and has increased by $1,000 per year.The press could last 5 more years with an estimated salvage of $2,000 at that time. Current market value of the press is $9,000. A new press can be purchased for $36,000 with an estimated life of 10 years. Annual operating costs are 0 in year 1 growing by $1,000 per year.

Page 5: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Cash Flow Approach

End of Operating and End of Operating and SalvageYear, t Maintenance Costs Year, t Maintenance Costs Value, St

-2 -4,000 -2-1 -5,000 -10 -6,000 0 36,0001 -7,000 1 0 30,0002 -8,000 2 -1,000 24,6003 -9,000 3 -2,000 19,8004 -10,000 4 -3,000 15,6005 -11,000 5 -4,000 12,000

6 -5,000 9,0007 -6,000 6,6008 -7,000 4,8009 -8,000 3,60010 -9,000 3,000

Page 6: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Cash Flow)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

Page 7: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Cash Flow)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

9,000

1,000

Page 8: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Cash Flow)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

NPW = -7,000 (P/A, 15,5) - 1,000 (P/G, 15,

5) + 2,000 (P/F,

15, 5)

= ($28,246)

Page 9: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Cash Flow)

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

9,000

1,000

NPW = 9,000 - 36,000 -1,000 (P/G,

15,5) + 12,000 (P/F,

15, 5)

= ($26,809)

Page 10: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Cash Flow)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

9,000

1,000

NPWK = ($28,246) NPWR = ($26,809)

Page 11: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Cash Flow)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

9,000

1,000

NPWK = ($28,246) NPWR = ($26,809)

Choose Replace

Page 12: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Cash Flow)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

9,000

1,000

NPWK = ($28,246) NPWR = ($26,809)

Note: NPWR - NPWK = $ 1,437

Page 13: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Outsider View)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

9,000

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

1,000

Page 14: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Outsider View)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

9,000

NPW = - 9,000 -7,000 (P/A, 15,5) - 1,000 (P/G, 15, 5) + 2,000 (P/F, 15,

5)

= ($37,246)

Page 15: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Outsider View)

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

1,000

NPW = - 36,000 -1,000 (P/G,

15,5) + 12,000 (P/F,

15, 5)

= ($35,809)

Page 16: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Outsider View)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

9,000

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

1,000

NPWK = ($37,246) NPWR = ($35,809)

Page 17: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Outsider View)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

9,000

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

1,000

NPWK = ($37,246) NPWR = ($35,809)

Choose Replace

Page 18: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Outsider View)

0 1 2 3 4 5

7,000

11,000

2,000

Keep

9,000

0 1 2 3 4 5

4,000

12,000

Replace

36,000

1,000

NPWK = ($37,246) NPWR = ($35,809)

Note: NPWR - NPWK = $ 1,437

Page 19: TM 661  Engineering Economics

With 10 year Horizon

Suppose we now consider a 10 year planninghorizon. We estimate that the old press willstill have a salvage value of $2,000 5 years fromnow but that the new press will only cost$31,000 5 years from now. Further, estimated salvage 5 years hence is $15,000.

Then:

Page 20: TM 661  Engineering Economics

With 10 Year Planning Horizon

0 0 9000 - 36000 = -270001 -7000 02 -8000 -10003 -9000 -20004 -10000 -30005 2000 -31000 -11000= -40000 -40006 0 -50007 -1000 -60008 -2000 -70009 -3000 -800010 15000 - 4000 = 11000 3000 - 9000 = -6000

NPWkeep = ($42,821.85)

NPWrep = ($43,237.92)

Keep old and replace at 5yr. point

Page 21: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Cash Flow)

0 1 2 3 4 5 10

7,00011,000

2,000

Keep

31,000

1,000

4,000

15,000

NPW = -7,000(P/A, 15,5) - 1,000(P/G,15,5) -29,000(P/F,15,5) -1,000(P/A,15,5)(P/F,15,5)

+ 12,000(P/F,15,10)= ($42,821)

Page 22: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Replacement (Cash Flow)

0 1 2 3 4 5 . . . 10

4,000

Replace

36,000

9,000

1,000

9,000

3,000

. . . .

NPW = -27,000 - 1,000(P/G,15,10) + 3,000(P/F,15,10)

= ($43,237)

Page 23: TM 661  Engineering Economics

10-Year Horizon

0 1 2 3 4 5 . . . 10

4,000

Replace

36,000

9,000

1,000

9,000

3,000

. . . .

0 1 2 3 4 5 10

7,00011,000

2,000

Keep

31,000

1,000

4,000

15,000

NPWK = (42,821) NPWR = (43,237)

Choose Keep, trade in 5 years

Page 24: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Multiple Alternatives

Suppose Dealer offers a $10,000 trade-in. In addition, we identify 2 new alternatives:

3. New press for $40,000 with salvage after 5 years of $13,000. Trade-in on this machine is $12,000.

4. Lease a press for $7,500 per year during the 5 year horizon. Existing press will be sold on the open market.

Page 25: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Trade - In / Lease Options

TRADE - IN / LEASE OPTIONS

Keep Replace A Replace B LeaseEnd of Net Cash Flows Net Cash Flows Net Cash Flows Net Cash FlowsYear, t A1t A2t A3t A4t

0 0 10000-36000= -26,000 12000-40000= -28,000 9000-7500= 1,5001 -7,000 0 -500 -7,5002 -8,000 -1,000 -1,000 -8,3003 -9,000 -2,000 -1,500 -9,1004 -10,000 -3,000 -2,000 -9,9005 2000-11000= -9,000 12000-4000= 8,000 13000-2500= 10,500 -3,200

NPWK = (28,246) NPWRA = (25,809) NPWRB = (26,100) NPWL = (24,532)

Page 26: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Outsider Viewpoint Approach

Cash Flows for Several Replacement Alternatives - Outsider's Viewpoint Approach

End of Net Cash Flows Net Cash Flows Net Cash Flows Net Cash FlowsYear, t A1t A2t A3t A4t

0 -9,000 -35,000 -37,000 -7,5001 -7,000 0 -500 -7,5002 -8,000 -1,000 -1,000 (-7500-800)= -8,3003 -9,000 -2,000 -1,500 (-7500-1600)= -9,1004 -10,000 -3,000 -2,000 (-7500-2400)= -9,9005 2000-11000= -9000 12000-4000= 8000 13000-2500= 10500 -3,200

NPWK = (37,246) NPWRA = (34,809) NPWRB = (35,100) NPWL = (33,532)

Page 27: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Optimal Replacement

Suppose we have a compressor which costs $2,000 and has annual maintenance costs of $500 increasing by $100 per year. MARR=20%.

Then:

Page 28: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Optimal ReplacementOptimal Replacement

t 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Yr0 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,0001 500 500 500 500 500 500 5002 600 600 600 600 600 600 6003 700 700 700 700 700 700 7004 800 800 800 800 800 800 8005 900 900 900 900 900 9006 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,0007 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,1008 1,200 1,200 1,2009 1,300 1,30010 1,400

NPV = 3,624 3,986 4,321 4,628 4,907 5,159 5,385

Page 29: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Optimal ReplacementOptimal Replacement

t 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Yr0 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,0001 500 500 500 500 500 500 5002 600 600 600 600 600 600 6003 700 700 700 700 700 700 7004 800 800 800 800 800 800 8005 900 900 900 900 900 9006 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,0007 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,1008 1,200 1,200 1,2009 1,300 1,30010 1,400

NPV = 3,624 3,986 4,321 4,628 4,907 5,159 5,385EUAC = ($1,400) ($1,333) ($1,299) ($1,284) ($1,279) ($1,280) ($1,336)

=NPV(.2,C5:C13)+C4 = PMT(.2,4,C14)

Page 30: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Class Problem

The new president of Angstrom Technologies feels the company must use the newest and finest equipment in its labs. He has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. Besides, he feels it can be shown that his proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per-year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis for a 5-year period.

Page 31: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Check Out Replacement Excel File

Page 32: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Class Problem

Current ProposedOriginal purchase price $30,000 $40,000Current market value 15,000 ...Estimated useful life, years 5 15Estimated value, 5 years $7,000 $10,000Salvage after 15 years ... 5,000Annual operating cost 5,000 3,000

Page 33: TM 661  Engineering Economics

Solution

7,000

5,000

0 1 2 3 4 5

40,000

15,00010,000

3,000

0 1 2 3 4 5

Keep Replace

EUAW = -5,000 + 7,000(A/F,15,5)

= ($3,962)

EUAW = -25,000(A/P,15,5) -3,000 + 10,000(A/F,15,5)

= ($8,975)


Recommended