+ All Categories
Home > Documents > To Lead or not to LEED? - Illinois Valley Community College · PDF fileTo Lead or not to LEED?...

To Lead or not to LEED? - Illinois Valley Community College · PDF fileTo Lead or not to LEED?...

Date post: 07-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: truongcong
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
20
To Lead or not to LEED? A No-Nonsense Approach to Sustainability Lourdes Gonzalez Director of Sustainability Adam Stribling Manager of Retro-Commissioning
Transcript

To Lead or not to LEED?

A No-Nonsense Approach to Sustainability

Lourdes Gonzalez Director of Sustainability

Adam Stribling Manager of Retro-Commissioning

What is LEED and LEED EBOM?

Why choose LEED Design

Alternative Design Approaches

How can I save more energy and money?

Retro-commissioning

Agenda

Lower operating costs

Reduce waste sent to landfills

Conserve energy and water

Be healthier and safer for occupants

Reduce harmful greenhouse gas emissions

LEED and LEED EBOM

LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design is a voluntary, consensus-based, market-driven program that provides third-party verification of green buildings. It is designed to:

Source: http://new.usgbc.org/

LEED and LEED EBOM

LEED EBOM LEED for Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance is the tool for ongoing operations and maintenance of existing commercial and institutional buildings.

The intent of LEED EBOM is to certify the operations and maintenance of the building and create a plan for ensuring high performance over time.

Source: http://new.usgbc.org/

The College Report Card surveys have shown dramatic increases on 52 green indicators since the publication of the first edition in 2007. For example, the percentages of schools that now have the following programs are:

LEED Payback

64% - Commitment to carbon emissions reduction (23% in 2006) 70% - Campus farm or garden (9% in 2006) 75% - Trayless dining (0% in 2006) 79% - Green building policy (22% in 2006) 95% - Sustainability committee (40% in 2006)

Energy/Utility savings

Operations

Grants or Matching funds

Student Engagement

Employee Retention

LEED Payback

Where LEED credits provide the most financial payback or impact on student experience

How it applies to campuses and real payback expectations

How it works, best practices, and financial rewards

Best Practices:

1. Build a Diverse Project Team

2. Set Appropriate Credit Goals

3. Perform a Building Audit

4. Pursue Certification Incrementally Beginning with Retro-commissioning

5. Pay For It

Know LEED EBOM

Understand alternative approaches to certification of new or existing buildings

Alternative Design Approaches

Department of Energy – Energy Star program Living Building Challenge State and Municipal Regulations Green Codes

“The systematic discovery, documentation, review, and improvement of energy operations through no/low-cost savings opportunities that match building performance to current functional requirements.”

Retro-Commissioning

Typical Savings Opportunities

Optimizing building systems and schedules through BAS Optimizing chiller and boiler operations to better match building

load conditions Reducing ventilation in over-ventilated areas Fixing ventilation dampers that are open when they should be

closed, or vice versa Decreasing supply air pressure set-point and system rebalancing Reducing supply air temperature and fan speed in air handling

units Aligning zone temperature set-points to match the building’s

actual operating schedule Operating equipment only when building is occupied or when

equipment is needed

Retro-Commissioning Program: Public Sector

Building Requirements

More than 5 years old

Exceeds 150,000 sq. ft.

Functional Building Automation System (BAS)

Minimum of guest access for the Retro- Commissioning Service Provider (RSP)

Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

Demonstrates potential to produce significant energy savings through RCx

Electricity

Natural gas

Retro-Commissioning Program: Public Sector

Client Requirements

Financial commitment for implementing (equipment/internal or external labor) Retro-Commissioning Measures (RCMs)

Decision made post-Planning, Investigation, and Recommendation Phase

18 month or less payback

$10,000 – Public

Commitment to active involvement in the RCx process:

Facility Owner and Staff

Active involvement includes:

Providing access to the facility

Providing time for facility personnel to interface with the RSP

Providing and assisting with the reporting, and collection of data pertaining to the facility RCx

Retro-Commissioning Program: Public Sector

Application Content:

Facility Information

Building Automation System

Equipment Details

Energy Usage Information

Renovation & upgrade projects

Past, current, or planned

Facility Staff availability

Retro-Commissioning Program: Public Sector

As-built drawings

Application available online:

http://smartenergy.arch.uiuc.edu/pdf/SEDAC_PY5_(2012-2013)_RCx_Program_Application-7-31-12-FINAL.pdf

Application Phase (Approx. 1 Month)

Planning, Investigation and Recommendation Phase (Approx. 3-5 Months) Evaluate function, sequencing, and scheduling of major systems

Interview with facility operation staff Set up BAS trends Spot check equipment on BAS Review as-built drawings

Identify RCMs Quantify energy savings

BAS trend data Spot measurements Data logging

RSP Deliverable/Scope of Work document Detailed RCM information and calculations Summary of data acquisition plans and results Energy and cost savings calculations for each RCM Implementation details including project cost Verification plans

Retro-Commissioning Program: Public Sector

Implementation Phase (Approx. 2-10 Months)

As the customer approves RCMs, the implementation team will perform the scope of work associated with the relevant measures

Implementation of the RCMs is the responsibility of the customer

The RSP will provide technical support as needed during this phase for the customer to implement the RCMs

The implementation team:

Facility engineers

Operational staff

Controls, mechanical, and/or electrical contractors

Retro-Commissioning Program: Public Sector

Verification Phase (Approx. 2 Months)

Inspect RCMs for installed equipment and controls modifications

Set up/collect trends depending on RCM

Conduct functional test depending on RCM

Perform spot measurements

Revise energy savings calculations as necessary

Final Verification Report

Final documentation of RCx process for implemented RCMs

Summary of completed RCMs

Final energy and cost savings

Final project cost and simple payback

Retro-Commissioning Program: Public Sector

How does LEED and LEED EBOM position you to save money?

Key elements to focus on when looking at LEED Design – and the important benefits

What are some Alternative Design Approaches to can help you reach similar goals

How to leverage state funded programs to save more energy and money?

Key Takeaways

Questions

Lourdes Gonzalez 312.242.6364

[email protected]

Adam Stribling 312.242.6394

[email protected]

www.primerachicago.com

L O U R D E S M . G O N Z A L E Z , A I A , L E E D A P B D + C , N D

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT & SUSTAINABILITY DIVISION MANAGER

Architecture & Construction Services Group

Ms. Gonzalez is a Licensed Architect and LEED Accredited Professional.

With over 25 years’ experience in the building industry, Ms. Gonzalez is a

Licensed Architect and as the firm’s Director of Sustainability she

managed the firms Sustainability, Architecture and Construction

Management Group for the last ten years.

Ms. Gonzalez has played an instrumental role in Primera’s growth over

the past decade. She leads the firm’s sustainability efforts and helped

position Primera as an innovator in the green building movement. Ms.

Gonzalez’s background includes architectural design, program

management, historic preservation and LEED consulting for varied sectors including Higher

Ed, K-12 Schools, Municipal, Industrial and Transportation facilities. She has a Bachelor of

Science in Architectural Studies and a Masters of Architecture, with a Historic Preservation

specialty from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

E D U C A T I O N & R E G I S T R A T I O N

Master of Architecture in Historic Preservation, University of Illinois at Champaign-

Urbana, 1988

Bachelor of Science in Architectural Studies, University of Illinois at Champaign-

Urbana, 1986

Licensed Architect, State of Illinois 001.013663, Utah

LEED Accredited Professional, BD+C, ND

Project Manager, Capital Development Board

Self-Certified Architect, City of Chicago,

Registered Energy Professional, City of Chicago

Chicago Chapter, Past President, Construction Management Association of America

(CMAA)

Committee Member, ACEC Illinois, MWRDGC

Member, Zero Energy Commercial Buildings Consortium, Building Envelope Working

Group

A D A M D . S T R I B L I N G , L E E D G R E E N A S S O C I A T E

Manager of Retro-Commissioning

Mr. Stribling is the Commissioning Project Manager at Primera. Mr.

Stribling has extensive experience managing the commissioning process

for renovation and new construction projects. He has a strong

understanding of the LEED rating system and commissioning applicable

requirements. Additionally, Mr. Stribling manages all of Primera’s retro-

commissioning projects through ComEd’s Smart Ideas Program.

E D U C A T I O N & R E G I S T R A T I O N

Bachelor of Arts in Communication Studies, The University of Iowa

LEED Green Associate, United States Green Building Council (USGBC)


Recommended