+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Top down or bottom up? Volcanic architecture, …dgeist/Chapman/...Top down or bottom up? Volcanic...

Top down or bottom up? Volcanic architecture, …dgeist/Chapman/...Top down or bottom up? Volcanic...

Date post: 25-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 9 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
43
Top down or bottom up? Volcanic architecture, climate, and hydrologic evolution of volcanic landscapes Anne Jefferson University of North Carolina at Charlotte The Galápagos as a Laboratory for the Earth Sciences AGU Chapman Conference- July 2011 Photo by A. Jefferson
Transcript

Top down or bottom up?

Volcanic architecture, climate,

and hydrologic evolution of

volcanic landscapes

Anne JeffersonUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte

The Galápagos as a Laboratory for the Earth Sciences

AGU Chapman Conference- July 2011Photo by A. Jefferson

Recent lava, FernandinaLaguna El Junco, San Cristobal

View from Mauna Loa towards Mauna Kea (USGS photo)

West Maui mountains

Photo by S.O.S.: http://www.panoramio.com/user/541937 http://cbrowninecuador.blogspot.com/2011/04/galapagos.html

http://photos.igougo.com/journal-photos-j20532-Maui-West_Maui_Ocean_Fun_and_Hiking_Adventures.html#75759

Oregon

High

Cascades

~0.18 Ma

~2.2 Ma

~0.02 Ma

Kilauea

(active)

Kohala

(~0.5 Ma)

West Maui

(1.5 Ma)

Kauai

(4.5 Ma)

Hawaii

(images from Porder & Vitousek)

(images by A. Jefferson)

Volcano hydrology

Precipitation Evapotranspiration

Infiltration to Groundwater

Precipitation – Evapotranspiration =

Runoff + Groundwater

Partitioning between runoff and groundwater is

controlled by infiltration capacity or permeability

More runoff greater erosion of landscape

Generalized

model of

groundwater on

volcanic islands

Basal groundwater

Saltwater

High-level groundwater

Join et al. 2005

springs

springs

wells

Shield volcanoes of the world

Shield volcano Other volcanoDatabase: Global Volcanism Program

Hydrogeologically known shield volcanoes

Shield volcano Other volcanoDatabase: Global Volcanism Program

Reunion

Jeju Island

Hawaii

Cascades

Easter Island

AzoresMadeiraCanary

Galapagos

Samoa

Cape

Verde

Time0 >5 Ma

Pre

cip

ita

tion

12 m/a

Complex and

highly altered

Lava

stack

0

Controls on

volcano

hydrology

Image sources:

http://www.unavco.org/community_science/science_highlights/2008/sierra_negra.html

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/File:Bora-Bora.png

http://www.galenfrysinger.com/cape_verde_islands.htm

http://www.madeira-island-holidays.info/

http://prochas.free.fr/reunion/Piton%20des%20neiges.jpg

Tim

e

Pre

cip

ita

tion

Controls on

volcano

hydrology

“Bottom Up”

Processes

“Top Down”

Processes

Things that influence the

hydrology of volcanoes

Bottom Up Processeshttp://www.galapagosvoyage.com/blog/geology/erupting-volcanoes-during-your-galapagos-travels/

1. Eruption style and product

shield volcano stratovolcano

Pe

rme

ab

ility

Cin

der

cones

Tra

chyte

s

Tra

chybasalts

Sedim

enta

ry r

ocks

Ba

sa

lts

Jeju Island (Won et al., 2005)

2. Composition

• Effusive volcanism is

dominated by basalt

• Silicic lavas generally less

permeable, because flows

more massive

Singhal and Gupta, 2010 after Walker, 1973

Andesite, Lascar (P. Francis)

Rhyolite, Newberry (E Klemetti)

Dacite, Chao (S. da Silva)

Basalt, Black Point lava flow (NASA)

(Katz and Cashman, 2003)

Permeability (k)

Dep

th

flow

top

flow

base

3. Flow structure and

stacking

Permeability (k)

Dep

th

(Geshi, 2005)

4. Decreasing permeability with depth

Caused by:

• Compaction

• Hydrothermal

alteration

• Other pore-filling

mechanisms

Permeability (k)

Depth

Saar &

Manga, 2004

Saar and Manga, 2004

Hydrogeologic conceptual model of

volcanoes with decreasing permeability

Join et al. (2005) suggest that as volcanoes age, the

regional water table becomes progressively higher

and smoother – as permeability of both core and

surface decrease & erosion reduces relief

Join et al. 2005 (Reunion)

modified from Custodio et al. 1988 (Canary Is.)

k = 10-9 m2

k = 10-9 m2

k = 10-11 m2

k = 10-13 m2

Similar to Karthala & Mauritius

5. Dikes and other intrusive bodies

“Conventional conceptual model” because of

early work in Hawaii

Modified from Gingerich and Oki 2000 (Oahu)

Similar to Kilauea (Scholl et al., 1996)

Appropriate for Madeira (Prada et al., 2005)

Lanai (Stearns, 1942)

6. Faulting (& hydrothermal circulation)

Conduits for mixing

Locations of

hydrothermal alteration

Calderas may pond

surface water

Oregon Cascades

Jefferson et al., 2006, Ingebritsen et al., 1992, 1994

Kilauea

Conrad et al., 1997

Alcedo

Goff et al., 2000

7. Magma-water interaction

• Good indicator of

hydrologic environment at

time of eruption:

lake, groundwater, ocean

• High water/magma ratios

produce fine grained

(low k) deposits– Low water/magma ratios

produce coarse (higher k)

deposits

• Faster alteration than

lava flows reduced k

Kilauea, 2008

Kilauea ocean entry, 4 June 2008 (USGS)

http://bigthink.com/ideas/23121

8. Landslides

Consequences:

• Steepen slopes and

hydraulic gradients

• Expose new springs

• Unearth older rocks

• Create knickpoints that

drive stream erosion

and landscape

dissection

10 km

Mitchell, 2003Lamb et al. 2007

NPS map

9. Ash fall • Ash has high

permeability, but

weathers quickly to

Andisols with high

water retention

• Fill pores at lava

surface & clogs

fractures

• Perched water

bodies occur above

weathered ash

layers

Location of valleys

on Hawaii

Location of surface

and near-surface

ash depositsGulick, 2005

Lassen (USGS 1890)

1

2

3

4

5

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

Piton de la

Fournaise

Madeira

Sao

Vicente

Investigating “bottom up” processes

Stacked

lavas

Tephra,

landslide

or dikes

Explosive

eruptions,

Hydro-

thermal

Hydro-

thermal

Approximate volcano age (Myrs)

Co

mp

lexit

y o

f v

olc

an

ic a

rch

itectu

re

Jeju

Kilauea

Alcedo

Sierra

Negra

Santa

Cruz

San

Cristobal

Scott

Mountain

Furnas Faial

Top-down processes

Photo by A. Jefferson

1. Loess and dust inputs• Loess and dust form

fine-grained mantle,

clog pores, fill swales

– smooth topography,

– promote drainage

development0.13 Ma

0.53 Ma 0.82 Ma

1.09 Ma

Drainage on

dust-covered

lava, Lunar

Crater, NV

(Dohrenwend

et al., 1987)

Kohala

Porder et al., 2007

Eppes and Harrison, 1999

Portrillo Volcanic Field, NM

2. Glaciation

• Till has lower permeability than lava

• Glaciers may scour rubble, compact voids, and

erode troughs later used by liquid water

Collier lava flow (1600 years old)

Glacial till (~10,000 years old)

Photos from Hopson, 1946

Recent lava resting on glacially

grooved andesite

3. Mechanical weathering• Rates usually exceed chemical weathering

• May smooth the land surface

• Material removed by surface drainage

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

10 100 1000 10000

Ru

no

ff (

mm

/yr)

Approximate volcano age (kyrs)

Mechanical denudation (mm/kyr)

Data from Louvat and Allegre, 1997, 1998

Piton de la

Fournaise

Piton des

Neiges

Fogo

Furnas/

Povoacao Nordeste

Rivière de l'Est (Réunion)

Thierry Cailleux (on Flickr)

4. Chemical weathering

• Basalts weather quickly relative to other

rocks, creating low k, clay-rich soils

• Promotes near surface lateral flow

• Possibly deep k reduction from groundwater if

high temperatures or long travel time (e.g., Rad et al., 2007, 2011)

Dessert et al., 2003

Basalt terrains

Porder et al., 2007

Hawaii

5. Vegetation and soil development

• Plant roots initially

increase porosity

• Organic matter can

be a large fraction

of young lava soils

& has high water

retention

• Pahoehoe develops

plants & soils faster

than aa lava

High Cascades: Vegetation

density and soil depth

increase toward the edge of

lava flows

Intertwined

soil and

hydrologic

evolution

As soils develop, k values decrease,

reducing vertical water movement,

and promoting near-surface lateral flow

Adelinet et al. 2008

San Cristobal

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

An

nu

al

Pre

cip

ita

tio

n (

m)

Age range of volcanic activity (Ma)

Reunion-Mauritius

Society

Samoa

Hawaii

MadeiraComoros

High CascadesAzores & Jeju

Austral & CookMarquesas

GalapagosEaster Island

Cape VerdeCanary

Investigating “top down” evolution

Hydrologic

evolution of the

High Cascades

Tim

ePre

cip

itation

Limited

Faulting,

Dike injection,

hydrothermal alteration

Glaciation,

mechanical weathering,

chemical weathering,

vegetation & soil development

Photos by A. Jefferson

Chronosequence

• 9 High Cascades

watersheds

(0.017 Ma to 2.2 Ma)

•Area: 6 – 238 km2

• Elevation: 432-3075 m

(mean: 974-1603 m)

• Precip: 1.9 to 2.7 m/yr

• 2 glacial troughs

Jefferson et al., 2010

Hydrographs

evolve toward

greater seasonal

and event

response.

Jefferson et al., 2006, 2010

As hydrographs

become

flashier…

r² = 0.40

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.01 0.1 1 10

the drainage

network

expands

Watershed Age (millions of years)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0.01 0.1 1 10

Watershed Age (millions of years)

Inte

gra

ted D

rain

age

Density (

km

/km

2)

Perc

ent baseflo

w(%

)

r2 = 0.66

Jefferson et al., 2010

y = 0.0317Ln(x) + 0.4209

R2 = 0.77

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

Basalt age (millions of years)

Dra

inage d

ensity (

km

/km

2)

Springs are persistent…

with constructional morphology.Jefferson et al., 2010

Spring-fed streams are

geomorphically ineffective.

• 1.55 m3/s

• 5 - 18 m wide

• 10 - 30 m deep valley

• 2.4 m3/s

• 3 m wide

• no valley

2 spring channels on same lava

Jefferson et al., 2010

Flashy streams

move sediment.

• Step-pool morphology

• Debris flows on slopes >0.2

Jefferson et al., 2010

Watershed topography is a

function of age.

Spring-fed (0.084 Ma)

Flashy (0.18 Ma)

Slo

pe

Dissected (2.2 Ma)

Constructional (0.017 Ma)

High Cascades

Jefferson et al., 2010

Conditions for landscape dissectionKnown:

• Channel network

• Flashy hydrograph

that moves sediment

• > 0.2 Myrs

Inferred:

• Low permeability (k) soil

lateral water flow

• Low k bedrock

keep water in streams

Extrapolated chemical weathering

rate: 0.011 to 0.018 mm/yrJefferson et al., 2010

Tephra soil, Santa Negra

Proxy Falls, High Cascades

High k,

GW drainage

Low k

mantle

develops

Weathering

lowers

bedrock k

Channel

development

begins

GW flow

is blocked

Flashy

streams

incise

through

bedrock,

landscape

dissected

Coevolutionary sequence

Time

.01 – 0.1 Myr

0.2 – 0.8 Myr

1-2 Myr

Based on Jefferson et al., 2010

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0.001 0.1 10 Tim

e

Pre

cip

ita

tion

Hydrologic

evolution is a

function of

“top down” &

“bottom up”

processes.

• Hydrologic evolution is

quantifiable by surface and

subsurface hydrologic and

topographic parameters.

• Partitioning of water

between the surface and

subsurface has implications

for water resources

available to island

populations and for volcanic

hazards.

Bedrock channel, Santa Cruz

1979 or 2005 tephra, Santa Negra

Photos by A. Jefferson

Open Questions

• What controls the relative importance of bottom

up versus top down processes?

• How do the trajectories and rates of hydrologic

evolution proceed in arid climates?

• What happens to submarine groundwater

discharge over time?

• How do we account for past climate variability?

• How do we move forward in data-sparse

environments?


Recommended