Collectorate, Wardha
TOWARDS VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT
Prepared by
Rajbhavan Complex, Baner Road, Pune 411 007
YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN ACADEMY OF DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION
WARDHA DEVELOPMENT REPORT
2017
Contributors
� Motivation
Concept
Lead team
Report Writing
Support staff in YASHADA
�
�
�
�
Anand Limaye,
Shailesh Nawal,
Dr. Minal Naravane,
Vinay Kulkarni,
Dr. Atul Naubade,
Dr. Lahu Waware
Director General, YASHADA, Pune
District Collector, Wardha
Director, Center for Human Development, YASHADA
Project Manager, YASHADA, Pune
Project Officer, YASHADA, Pune
Principal (Acting), Smt. Ratnaprabhadevi Patil Womens College, Bawda, Pune
Mohan Thorwat
Sushant Korane
Bramhanand Deshmukh
IAS
IAS,
ii
Message
Devendra FadnavisChief Minister
Maharashtra
Mantralaya
Mumbai - 400 032
Wardha Development Report, 2018 is an effort to assess the developmental scenario in the
district. The report has many salient features. Thematic approach of this report is focused on finding
developmental gaps in that area. Various dimension such as agriculture, irrigation, household
Infrastructure, education, health, livelihood are analysed in the report. Whole report is based on the
household level primary data collected. An index of Grampanchayat Development is formulated.
The awareness of major schemes is examined as well as beneficiaries are identified. Such a report is
of great help for planning at Grampanchayat level. The dashboard will prove an effective medium for
monitoring the development within each parameter for each of the Grampanchayats.
I appreciate the initiative of Shailesh Nawal, District Collector, Wardha. I also congratulate
YASHADAfor preparing such a seminal document and the dashboard.
Chief Minister
Maharashtra
gË`_od O`Vo
iii
Message
Wardha district has its own history and culture. The district has rural character and it is
primarily an agricultural district. The Government is aware that though progress has been made in
various sectors, there is lot to be done in the field. The Government is there for making sincere efforts
to provide basic service of water, sanitation, housing, roads, education and health with the facilities
for banking, digital village and pension to needy and other welfare schemes. The State Government
and the district administration are committed to development of each and every village.
This report provides the direction for interventions in various areas of Wardha. It is the
scientific base on which the district administration can plan further developmental path. I
congratulate district administration for conceptualizing and taking initiative to prepare the report. I
also compliment Mr. Anand Limaye, Director General, YASHADA for preparing this document,
which is one of its kind.
I am sure that this report will help us in great deal for improving developmental status of
villages in Wardha district.
(Sudhir Mungantiwar)
Guardian Minister, Wardha
gË`_od O`Vo
_§Ìr{dÎm Am{U {Z`moOZ, dZo
_hmamï´ emgZ
v
Debashish ChakravartiAdditional Chief Secretary, Planning
Maharashtra
(Debashish Chakravarti)
The fourteenth Finance Commission has recommended assured transfers to the local bodies
at rural and urban level for planning and delivery of basic services smoothly and effectively within
the functions assigned to them under relevant legislations. The present report, which is prepared on
the basis of primary survey of 152 Grampanchayats in Wardha district can serve as a sound base for
deciding interventions and allocating resources for Grampanchayats. The report is useful for
providing basic services to the rural people in Wardha. The dashboard prepared will be of immense
help for monitoring the provision of basic services.
I congratulate Shailesh Nawal, District Collector, Wardha for taking such an initiative.
YASHADA deserves word of appreciation for preparing such an influential document and effective
dashboard.
Additional Chief Secretary, Planning
Message
vii
Message
Anoop Kumar, IAS
Divisional Commissioner,
Nagpur
(Anup Kumar, IAS)
The economic and social development of a district can be achieved by collective efforts of the
Administration, peoples representatives and local self government with good participation with good
participation of the people. Development does not only mean creation of essential physical and social
infrastructure but also improving all the indicators of social and human development of the people of the
district. The approach has to go beyond just implementation of government schemes and achievement of
physical and financial targets thereof but to achieve the desired outcomes of those policies. To map the
impact and outcome, accurate matrix needed to be developed for constant measurement of indices. This
requires evidence based research and studies which could clearly bring out the impact and effectiveness of
current policies and programme. Wardha is a district which is primarily rural and has a rural and great
potential for a agricultural and allied sector development. livelihood development is a major challenge here.
The developmental endeavours require to be focused in the backward villages further deciding the sector for
developmental activities is a prerequisite. The identification of such areas and sector is a tough process for
the divisional and the district administration. This report has achieved this task by applying proper statistical
tools for analysis of the data collected for the study.
I compliment district administration, Wardha for initiating such kind of report. The findings of the
repot will form the basis of future development planning and well designed study which will unleash a new
trend of development planning interventions. I congratulateYASHADAfor preparing such a path breaking.
Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur
ix
Preface
Rural development is a priority agenda of the Government. Different measures are being
taken to address the basic needs in the rural area and to develop its social and physical
infrastructure. There is a need for more systematic and vigorous measures in some districts like
Wardha.And hence this report.
The report has been prepared by YASHADA on the initiative of the District Collector, Wardha.
The report identifies the villages and sectors in Wardha district where interventions are required to
be planned and executed on priority basis.Aprimary survey has been conducted of all households
in 152 Gramapanchayats for obtaining authentic, reliable and updated data for planning of
interventions. The Grampanchayat Development Index is formulated for identification of areas
and sectors. The qualitative data was collected from Self Help Groups and Farmers' Producer
Companies and it has been analysed to provide deeper understanding of the issues. Thus, on the
basis of analysis of both, the quantitative and qualitative data, the report provides
recommendation for future path of development of the villages in the district.
Shri Shailesh Nawal, District Collector, Wardha, deserves congratulations for initiating this study,
which focuses on village development. Dr. Minal Naravane, Director, Centre for Human
Development in YASHADAand her team have taken sincere efforts in bringing out this important
document and their work is highly appreciated. Also to be appreciated are all the contributors and
stakeholders in this pioneering exercise.
Best wishes!
Director General
YASHADA
Anand M. Limaye
xi
Foreword
The development report of any district has to basically address the issue of formulation of
action plan, which will accelerate pace of development. This report is prepared to obtain deeper
understanding of the issues of development in rural areas of Wardha. This report covers major
aspects of development such as agriculture, irrigation, livelihood, education, health, financial
inclusion and household infrastructure. An effort has been made to find the percolation of
Government schemes to the people.
The report is based on data collected through primary survey of 152 Gramapanchayats. In
the first chapter the context of the report, overall methodology of the survey and the methodology
of Gramapanchayat Development Index (GPDI) is explained. The developmental scenario of
Gramapanchayats with the help of GPDI is provided in the second chapter. Further chapters
elaborate findings related to other developmental sectors. The suggestions and recommendations
given in the last chapter are indicative and point towards future actions of the district. The report
apart from quantitative data analysis anslyses issues related Self Help Group and Farmers'
Producers Companies on the basis of qualitative data. The report is prepared in a user friendly
manner which provides clear cut questions and answers for the readers.
In addition to the report reports of each of the Grampanchayats have been prepared
separately which are useful for tracking and monitoring of the village level development. A
dashboard is also prepared on the basis of the data which can prove useful for monitoring the
public service delivery and beneficiaries from time to time.
This report would not have been possible without the efforts of YASHADA and I am
thankful to AanandLimaye, Director General, YASHADA for the same. I also congratulate
Dr.MinalNaravane, Director, Center for Human Development, YASHADA and her team for
putting meticulous efforts in all kinds of the research activities undertaken from planning to
writing the report. I extend my sincere thanks to Hindi Vishwa Vidyalay, Wardha and
Dr. BabsahebAmedakar College, Wardha for sparing their students for data collection activities.
At last, the district administration is committed to put into practice the recommendation in
this report and improve the developmental status of people in Wardha.
District Collector, Wardha
(Shailesh Nawal, )IAS
xiii
ANC - Ante Natal Check Ups
DRDA - District Rural Development Agency
FPO - Farmers' producer Companies
GPDI - Gram Panchayat development Index
GPs - Gram Panchayat
HDR - Human Development Report
HH - Households
LPG - Liquid Petroleum Gas
MAVIM - MahilaAarthikVikasMahamandal
MYS - Mean years of Schooling
SC - Scheduled Caste
SHG - Self Help Group
SLE - School Life Expectancy
ST - Scheduled Tribes
Acronyms
xv
Contents
Message by Devendra Fadnavis, Hon'ble Chief Minister, Maharashtra iii
Message by Sudhir Mungantivar, Hon Guardian Minister of Wardha v
Message by Debashish Chakravarty, ACS Planning Department, GoM vii
Message by Anup Kumar, Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur ix
Preface by Aanand Limaye, Director General, YASHADA xi
Foreword by Shailesh Nawal, District Collector, Wardha xiii
Acronyms xv
Appendix 99
Chapter 1 - Context and Methodology 01
Chapter 2 - Grampanchayat Development Scenario 11
Chapter 3 - Agriculture, Irrigation and Livelihood 22
Chapter 4 - Education and Healthy Living 39
Chapter 5 - Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure 56
Chapter 6 - Percolation of Government Schemes 73
Chapter 7 - Way ahead 82
1. Tables 101
101
2. Tools used for data collection 102
3. List of Coordinator and data investigators 118
4. List of FPOs rom which data was collected 124
5. Gram Panchayat and values of the indicators 125
Table 1: Number of villages block wise
Table 2: Number of villages, block wise (in sample) 101
xvii
Context
and
Methodology
1.
I would say that if the village perishes India will perish too.- Mahatma Gandhi
1. What is the objective of the report?
2 How the report differs from District Human
Development Report?
India is said to be a country of villages. Majority of our
people live in villages. Hence, the development of
villages and welfare of villagers is vital for the progress
of our country. It is said that formerly, village life was
very happy. People had very few needs which could be
met in their own villages. Not only basic needs of food,
shelter and clothes but the needs of recreation,
education, health, and livelihood also were satisfied in
the villages only. The villages were self-sufficient and
the people there lived happy life. With the progress of
industry, towns began to grow up. The urbanization
drew away the landlords and other rich men from the
villages. The workers such as carpenters, smiths,
weavers lost their customers and they had to come over
to towns for living. The result was that the life in the
villages changed and the economy ruined.
The villages in Maharashtra are not an exception.
Maharashtra is highly urbanized and has highest
proportion of urban population in the country. But
around 55 per cent of the population is staying in the
villages. Wardha district comprises of 8 blocks and 973
inhabited villages as per Census data of 2011 (Appendix
1, Table 1). Around 67.5 per cent of the population is
rural in the district. Thus the face of the district is rural.
Realizing that there is no development of district
without the development of villages, the present report
focuses on issues related to village development in the
Wardha district. The main objective of the present report
is to identify the gaps and the areas of interventions at
the Grampanchayat level of Wardha district. The
rational of the objective is that, addressing the gaps in
the major sectors such as health, education,
infrastructure, agriculture, irrigation and livelihood will
lead to development of villages.
There are development paradigms based on economic
growth or social development of people. The
developmental model based on economic growth
emphasizes that the growth in per capita income will
lead to development of that region. The infrastructure
and physical facilities required for economic growth
become crucial in the paradigm. The human
development paradigm goes beyond the economic
growth or increase in per capita income. It underlines the
importance of development in education, health and
standard of living of people. The human development
paradigm is people centric and defines development as
enlarging people's choices. The social infrastructure
such as schools, health care institutions, training and
capacity building institutes as well as freedom and peace
of the people become imperative in the paradigm of
human development.
The district Human Development Reports (HDR),
hence, focuse on analysis of broad themes such as
demography, education, health, governance,
agriculture, irrigation, income, vulnerable groups etc.
The HDRs provide an overview of the status and
progress of developmental areas. The data of various
indicators is analyzed for spatial and regional
comparisons. An indicator is a tool that provides
specific information on the state or condition of the
concerned phenomenon. It is quantifiable or
measurable. The HDRs, in addition to analysis of data
about the indicators also use qualitative data in the form
of case studies or anecdotes. Based on the data analysis
the HDRs make certain recommendations which can
then be used for policy formulation or preparing action
plans. Thus HDRs are the tools for preparing macro
level policies and interventions.
The present report reflects upon similar developmental
themes of education, health, agriculture, irrigation
employment, infrastructure and income as that in
HDRs. However it adopts micro level approach. The
primary data of households and the data collected from
the Grampanchayats is used to find areas of
interventions at household level and village level. A
Grampanchayat Development Index is conceptualized
to provide status of villages. Thus the report provides
specific suggestions and areas of interventions for
villages in Wardha district rather than broad macro level
suggestions.
Main objective of Grampanchayat Report is to highlight
the status of major parameters of development and
specific issues in the concerned Grampanchayats. Also
3 What is the purpose of reports of each
Grampanchayats?
Wardha Development Report
02
Grampanchayat reports will facilitate effective
implementation of schemes. The developmental works
at the village level are often driven by the district
administration through various development schemes.
It is a general experience that identification and reaching
out to beneficiaries of schemes is always an issue for the
district administration. The complexities of village
dynamics do not allow the schemes to reach the needed.
The data and listing of people in the villages who are
eligible but excluded from the schemes will help district
administrators for reaching the un-reached. The
Grampanchayat reports provides same.
The report suggests interventions for improvement in
agriculture, irrigation, infrastructure, education and
health and the related schemes. An index is formulated
for each village. The dimensions considered for
calculating index are agriculture and irrigation,
livelihood, education, health, household infrastructure
and financial inclusion. Specific indicators are used in
each dimension for articulating 'Grampanchayat
Development Index'
There are certain qualities of an ideal index. They are-
An index should be able to capture variations in
different regions
Readily available data on a small area level
A method of amalgamating indicators that can be
performed by anyone with minimum technical
requirements
Interchangeability of indicators without loss of
explanatory power
Aclear distinction between various dimensions
Flexibility to use the index to compare locations
within areas
It is to be noted that a single metric cannot fulfill all these
requirements.
The Grampanchayat Index is an
Underlying hypotheses of Grampanchayat
Development Index:
4 What is the basis of suggested interventions?
�
�
�
�
�
�
effort to meet the requirements of district
administration. The deriving of index is based on
following hypotheses:
1. An index which is locally-derived and constructed
for small areas (such as village) within an
administrative jurisdiction will be of greater value
to administrators than a standardized, global index
(which is used at higher level for decision making).
2. The rank order of small areas (villages) within a
geographic unit (block) will not be sensitive to
weighting of schemes.
Though these hypotheses have no rationale, they are
open to empirical validation. Thus, the prime motivation
for Grampanchayat Development Index was to develop
a tool that had meaning on a local level, and that could be
used to make decisions by the district administrators,
decide interventions and monitor their consequences.
There are three components in the framework of
Grampanchayat Development Index. i) Measurable
Objective ii) Dimension iii) Indicators .
An index requires carefully conceived goal
and objective. The index cannot be formulated for index
sake. Objectives related to the overall goals of an index
and can be assessed with data. They comprise the top-
level of aggregation in the Grampanchayat
Development Index framework. The Grampanchayat
Development is the cumulative effect of many
parameters and hence the measurable objectives related
to each parameter are stated (Figure 1.1). They are as
follows:
1. Improved status of income generation
2. Improved social standard
3. Increased standard of life of individuals
Objectives:
5 Which indicators are used for Grampanchayat
Development Index? Or what is the indicator
framework for Grampanchayat Development
Index?
1
Context and Methodology
03
Source: Building an Indicator framework, in Measuring Progress, A practical Guide form The Developers of Environmental Performance Index, 2013,New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy
Box 1.1.
Principles used for Indicator Selection
Relevance:
Performance orientation:
Data quality:
Spatial availability of the data:
Consistency of data:
Achievement orientation:
Coverage:
Distribution:
The indicator is related to village development
The indicator provides empirical data related to implementation of a Government scheme
The data used for formulating indicator is reliable and valid
The data is available for Grampanchayats in different blocks
The data should be available over a period of time, so that progress in any indicator can be studied. (The data about
Grampanchayats can be collected periodically)
It indicates achievement in the concerned area
The indicator covers whole range of population in the concerned area as far as possible
Any indicator for a set of geographically-associated administrative units will have a distribution. For the areas
containing small area jurisdictions such as Grampanchayats, the exact shape of such a distribution is hard to
predict, but it is likely that the tails are distorted from expectation based on a normal distribution.
Local acceptance: The indicator should have local acceptance
Wardha Development Report
04
Dimensions: Dimensions are the facets of measurable
objectives. Dimensions are the intermediate level
between indicators and objectives. Dimensions help to
summarize the components used to measure the
objectives and meet the objective of the index.
Dimensions also help to organize an indicator
framework, particularly when an index includes many
types of different indicators.
In the context of Grampanchayat Development Index,
the dimensions are the parameters of development of
village. They are -
Agriculture and irrigation
Livelihood
�
�
�
�
�
�
Education
Healthy living
Financial Inclusion and
Household infrastructure.
The third component of the indicator
framework includes the indicators which are
quantitative variables measured from the data. There is
no single way to determine appropriate indicators for an
index. The indicators which are satisfying the
conditions provided in Box 1.1 are selected for
Grampanchayat Development Index.
Indicators:
The indicators' framework is provided in the figure 1.1. The definition of indicators of education are provided at
the end of the chapter in notes.
Percentage of Household with Electricity
Percentage of Household with LPG
Percentage of Owned Household
Percentage of Household with availability ofdrinking water for 12 months
Percentage of Household usingindividual toilets
Percentage of Household with hygienicdrainage facility
Householdinfrastructure
Increased standardof life of individuals
Percentage of Household with hygienicfacility of garbage disposal
Percentage of pacca house
Context and Methodology
05
Figure 1.1: Indicators' Framework for Grampanchayats Development Index
Objectives Dimensions Indicators
Agriculture andirrigation
Percentage of Household with owned land
Percentage of Household with irrigated land
Percentage of farmers' doing supplementaryoccupation
Percentage of working population in theworking age group (18-60 years)
Mean Years of Schooling of the populationof age 25 years and above
School life expectancy of the populationof age 6-18 years of age
Proportion of population (>6 Years)with no addiction
Percentage of Household with at least onewoman as member of SHG
Percentage of persons (> 6 years of age)with bank account
Livelihood
Education
Healthy living
FinancialInclusion
Improved status ofincome generation
Improvedsocial standard
Wardha Development Report
06
6. How Grampanchayat Development Index is
calculated?
Step 1: As Grampanchayat development index is
treated as an achievement indicator, all the indicators are
positive. They are normalized by using following
formula:
Normalised score=
Actual value-Minimum Value
of the indicator Maximum Value-Minimum Value
The ideal values of the indicators were decided as
maximum and minimum values (which are known as
upper and lower goal posts) of each of the indicator. The
maximum and minimum values for various indicators
are given below (Table 1.1).
Table 1.1 : Goalposts for indicators
Indicator Upper goal Lower goal
post post
Agriculture
Livelihood
Education
Percentage of Households with owned land 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Households with irrigated land 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Households (farmers) doing supplementary occupation 100.00 0.00
Percentage of working population in the age group 18-60 years 100.00 0.00
Mean Years of Schooling of the population of age 25 years and above 17.00 0.00
School life expectancy of the population of age 6-18 years of age 12.00 0.00
Health
Financial inclusion
Household infrastructure
Percentage of population (> 6 years of age) who has no addiction 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Households with at least one woman as member of SHG 100.00 0.00
Percentage of persons (> 6 years) with bank account 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Households with Electricity 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Households with LPG 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Owned Households 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Households with availability of drinking water for 12 months 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Householdsusing individual toilets 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Households with hygienic drainage facility 100.00 0.00
Percentage of Households with hygienic facility of garbage disposal 100.00 0.00
Percentage of pacca house 100.00 0.00
7. What functions will the Grampanchayat
Development Index serve?
8. How the data required for calculating index
is collected?
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
It is to be remembered that indicators or index are not
designed to provide the full understanding of the
parameter. Rather they help in the following:
Diagnose problems by depicting trends and
enabling comparisons between various
parameters.
Discover patterns of development in different
Grampanchayat.
E n a b l e c o m p a r i s o n b e t w e e n v a r i o u s
Grampanchayat.
Help in setting measurable goals in future.
Initiate action by helping to navigate to a desired
future.
Hold decision-makers and managers accountable.
Help in deciding Grampanchayats those require
more focus
Grampanchayat Development Index serves above
functions.
It was decided to collect the data from all the households
in the villages so that the district administration can be
provided the list of households in the selected villages,
for whom the specific schemes can be implemented.
Taking into consideration the resources available, it was
decided to collect data of around 55-60 thousand
households. The first step was to select the villages from
which the data needs to be obtained.
For the selection of villages following steps were
adopted:
1. It was decided by the district administration that the
development scenario of the villages covered in
scheme would be found out. The
reason for selecting these villages was that, these
villages were assumed to be backward villages in
the district and the work of was in
process in those. There were in all 552 villages
covered in scheme.
2. Out of 552 villages, the villages with households
more than or equal to 25 as per Census 2011 data
were selected for the study. There were 470 such
villages out of above 552 villages.
3. Out of these 470 villages 10 villages were having
population more than 4000. Out of 10 villages 8
Sampling of villages
Jalyukt Shiwar
Jalyukt Shiwar
Jalyukt Shiwar
Context and Methodology
07
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
Dimension index for each of the Grampanchayat
is then calculated by taking average of normalized
scores of the indicators in the concerned dimension.
Weights are given to different dimension
indices. The weights are intuitively given (Table 1.2).
The Dimension Score is calculated by multiplying
Dimension Index and the weight.
Aggregate Grampanchayats Development Index
is calculated by adding together allDimensionscores.
Table 1.2 : Weights of dimensions
SN Dimension Weight
1 Agriculture and irrigation 20 %
2 Livelihood 20 %
3 Education 20 %
4 Healthy living 20 %
5 Financial inclusion 10 %
6 Household infrastructure 10 %
Figure 1.2: Process of Index Calculation
Normalising the scoreof each indicator by
using formula
Calculating Dimensionindex of each dimensionby taking average of all
normalized scores ofthe indicators in the
concerned dimension
Calculating Dimensionscore by multiplyingdimension index by
concerned weight of thedimension given
in Table 1.1
Adding all DimensionScores to give
GrampanchayatsDevelopment Index
Villages were selected.
4. Among the remaining 462 villages 30 percent
villages i.e. 144 villages were selected randomly.
5. Thus in all 152 villages were selected (villages
from step 3 and step 4 above)
6. The unit of data collection was decided as
Grampanchayat so that interventions can be
implemented there. Hence, it was decided to
collect data of whole Grampanchayats of the
selected 152 villages. As such data of 152
Grampanchayats, related to 152 selected villages
was collected. Some of the Grampanchayatss were
group Grampanchayats. As such, the data from
other villages than the selected ones was also
collected. Thus at the end of the survey data in 253
villages was collected.
All the households in the selected Grampanchayats
were surveyed.
Selection of Households
9 What is the final sample size?
Table 1.3 : Sample size
Surveyed
Total Number %
against
Total
Final sample size is provided in Table 1.3
Grampanchayats 517 152 30 %
Villages 973 253 26 %
Households (Rural) 212493 56384 26.53 %
as per Census 2011
Numberofpersonsasper 877474 209287 23.85%
Census 2011 (Rural)
The number of Grampanchayats,Villages and households
within each block from which the data was collected is
provided in Appendix 1, Table 2. The spatial distribution
of sampleGrampanchayats is given inFigure1.3.
Figure 1.3: Spatial distribution of surveyed Grampanchayats
Map Source: https://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/maharashtra/districts/wardha.htm
Wardha Development Report
08
10. Which are the Tools used for data collection?
11. How was the data collected?
12. Who collected the field data?
14. When was the data collected?
15. How was the data quality ensured?
2
Following tools were used for data collection:
i. Schedule for household
ii. Schedule for Grampanchayats
iii. Interview schedule for Self Help Groups (SHG)
iv. Interview schedule for Farmers' Producers
Companies (FPO)
Tools are attached inAppendix 2.
By asking questions to the
household head or any senior member in the household
present at the time of the survey
By asking questions to the
Sarpanch or Gramsevak, whoever was present at the
time of survey
By interviewing group of Chairpersons and
minimum 2/3 members. In all 18 FPOs were
interviewed out of 21 FPOs in the district. (The list of 18
FPOs is attached inAppendix 4)
By interviewing group of Chairperson,
minimum 2/3 members and Group Coordinator. The
data from 600 SHGs was collected.
The students from Hindi Vishva Vidyalay, Wardha and
Dr. Babasaheb Aambedkar Social Work College,
Wardha collected the data (The list of data investigators
is provided in Appendix 3). The students were selected
through interviews. They were provided training by
YASHADA. The training was provided in the respective
colleges on 1 and 2 August 2017.
The data was collected from 3 August to 31 August
2017.
First of all, the schedules used for data collection were
pilot tested three times in Nagthana village of Wardha
Block. This ensured the content validity of data. The
data was collected online with the software
'EPICollect' . As data collection in the hard copy of the
From Households:
From Grampanchayats:
FPOs:
SHGs:
st nd
rd st
schedule and online data collection requires different
type of skills, the online data collection was pilot tested
as well.
The data investigates were provided training on the data
collection procedures. The data investigators were made
aware of objectives of the survey, contents of the
schedules, EP collect software and the sample size of
villages as well as households. The training of data
investigators helped collect reliable data. Further as the
data was collected online through mobile phones, the
procedures such as distribution of hard copies of schedule
before survey, collection of filled schedules after survey
and data entry were not required. This helped prevent
errors indataentryand improved thedataquality.
The validation checks were applied to the collected data
and the data was cleaned. The data of the variables, for
which the data was available in the Census, was cross
checked with Census. Proportion of SC, ST population
in Census and proportion of SC, ST population in the
collected data for each village was cross checked with
the Census. Similarly number of children in the age
group 0-6 years, literacy rate of the village was cross
checked with Census data. It was observed that the data
collected and the data in Census was differing maximum
by 2 percentage points. This indicated that the collected
data was of good quality. The cleaned data was
subjected to analysis.
This survey was conducted in 152 Grampanchayats in
Wardha district. All Grampanchayats are not covered.
Hence, the findings for the block are not attempted.
Another limitation of the survey is that though it was
decided to collect the data from all the households in the
sample villages, in practice it was not possible to collect
the data from all the households. This was because some
households were closed when the data investigators
visited the households. Some households denied to
provide the data. Even in one village in the sample
(name kept confidential) all the villagers opposed the
data collection process. The village was substituted by
the next village in the list of villages of that block having
approximately same population.
16. What are the limitations of the study?
2EPcollect software can be used on android mobiles. The backup data becomes available in excel form after the data is entered online in the software.
Available on www.five.epicollect.net
Context and Methodology
09
Further while calculating Grampanchayat Development
Index, it was seen that the data about mother and child
health was in one digit numbers. For example, in a village
with 150 households, the number of pregnant women in
the last year was maximum 8. Such a small number could
not be subjected to analysis for finding indicators such as
full Ante Natal Check Ups (ANC). Hence mother and
child indicators were not used in health dimension. The
data about number of addicted people was collected and
hence the only indicator used in health was the percentage
ofnon-addicted population.
First of all a cyclic process will be followed to examine
current status of the Grampanchayats, planning the
interventions, implementation the interventions and
evaluating them (Figure 1.4). The Grampanchayats will
be surveyed in a phased manner. In the first phase the
current survey of 152 Grampanchayats is conducted.
This will be followed by further phases of surveys of
other Grampanchayats. During the consequent surveys,
the data would be collected to formulate health
indicators encompassing all the population. The data
about more variables such as farmers' suicide,
functionality of Government institutions will be
collected so that major issues can be addressed.
1 School Life Expectancy (SLE): Number of years a
person of school entrance age can expect to spend
17. What is the plan to overcome the limitations of
the study?
Notes
Figure 1.4: Cyclic Process of Gramapanchayat
Development
Wardha Development Report
10
within the specified level of education. For a child
of a certain age a, the school life expectancy is
calculated as the sum of the age specific enrolment
rates for the levels of education specified. The part
of the enrolment that is not distributed by age is
divided by the school-age population for the level
of education they are enrolled in, and multiplied by
the duration of that level of education. The result is
then added to the sum of the age-specific enrolment
rates. A relatively high SLE indicates greater
probability for children to spend more years in
education and higher overall retention within the
education system. It must be noted that the
expected number of years does not necessarily
coincide with the expected number of grades of
education completed, because of repetition. Since
school life expectancy is an average based on
participation in different levels of education, the
expected number of years of schooling may be
pulled down by the magnitude of children who
never go to school. Those children who are in
school may benefit from many more years of
education than the average.
2 Mean Years of Schooling (MYS): It is the average
number of completed years of education of a
country's population aged 25 years and older. For
each level of education, the proportion that attained
that level of education is multiplied by the official
duration of that level. The sum of the resulting
values yields the MYS for the population under
investigation.
(Source: UNESCO Institute of Statistics)Examining status
of GPs in thephased manner
Examining statusof GPs in the
phased manner
Examining statusof GPs in the
phased manner
Examining statusof GPs in the
phased manner
2.
Grampanchayat
Development
Scenario
The future of India lies in its villages.
- Mahatma Gandhi
As stated in Chapter 1, the Grampanchayat
Development Index (GPDI) is used as an index to draw
conclusions about development of Grampanchayats in
Wardha. The GPDI of 152 Grampanchayats was found
out on the basis of following dimensions:
Agriculture and irrigation
Livelihood
Educational Status
Healthy living
Financial inclusion
Household infrastructure
The dimension index of each of the above dimension
was found out which was aggregated to form GPDI. The
Grampanchayats were classified on the basis of GPDI.
The present chapter provides the findings related to
GPDI.
The first step is organization of all Grampanchayats on
the basis of descending GPDI (Gram panchayat with
highest GPDI at the top and least GPDI in the bottom).
�
�
�
�
�
�
1 How the Grampanchayats are categorized on
the basis of GPDI?
Then the four quartiles (Categories) of villages are
formed by using standard statistical method. The details
of each category are as follows:
1 Quartile 1 Top 38
Grampanchayats High
2 Quartile 2 Middle 38
Grampanchayats High
3 Quartile 3 Lower Middle 38
Grampanchayats Medium
4 Quartile 4 Lowest 38
Grampanchayats Poor
The above classification will provide a clear guideline to
the d i s t r i c t admin i s t ra to r s regard ing the
Grampanchayats, where they need to focus more for
improving developmental status of the people.
All the Grampanchayats with their GPDI and dimension
wise index are given in Annexure 2.1 at the end of this
chapter.
Very
Category Details Category
No. name
Quartile
Table 2.1 : Grampanchayats are at the top and bottom for all indicators
Indicator GP at the top GP at the bottom
Block Name Value Block Name Value
Percentage of HH with owned Samudrapur Waigaon 71.65% Wardha Satoda 17.67%
Percentage of HH with irrigated Karanja Kajali 53.03% Devoli Amboda 0.00 %
Percentage of Hh (farmers) Arvi Bhadod 46.12% Devoli Chikhali 0.00%
Percentage of working population Samudrapur Faridpur 86.43% Ashti Navin Ashti 49.62%
Mean years of schooling of the Ashti Navin Ashti 9.5 Years Arvi Saldara 4.45 Years
School life expectancy of the Samudrapur Faridpur 12* Karnaja Boregaon 11.19
Percentage of population Samudrapur Karda 97.12% Hinganghat Satefal 68.44%
Land (Gond)
land
doing supplementary occupation
in the age group 18-60 Years
population of age 25 Years and
above
population of age 6-18 Years of (Dhole)
Age
(=> 6 years of age) who has no
Addiction
Wardha Development Report
12
2. Which Grampanchayats are at the top and bottom for all indicators used for finding GPDI?
Indicator GP at the Top GP at the Bottom
Block Name Value Block Name Value
Percentage of HH with at least Devoli Hiwra 97.48% Ashti Pilapur 3.13%
Percentage of persons (> 6 years) Karanja Kharas 92.07% Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 61.17%
Percentage of HH with electricity Wardha Inzapur 98.84% Arvi Kawadi 74.64%
Percentage of HH with LPG Wardha Satoda 89.14% Arvi Saldara 18.89 %
Percentage of Owned HH Ashti Drugwada 100 % Ashti Navinashti 79.87 %
Percentage of HH With Karanja Jasapur 100% Karanja Kharas 25.79%
Percentage of HH using Karanja Kajali 97.49% Hinganghat Jangona 11.93%
Percentage of HH with hygienic Devoli Yesgaon 95.28% Samudrapur Sewa 9.32%
drainage facility
Percentage of HH with hygienic Samudrapur Faridpur 95.74% Karanja Umari 13.47%
Percentage of Pacca House Wardha Satoda 77.96% Ashti Pilapur 20.63%
one woman as member of SHG Kaware
with bank account Khanda
Availability of drinking water Khanda
for 12 Months
individual toilets
facility of garbage disposal
*103 GPs have the value of SLE as 12.
Values of indicators of all Gram panchayat is given in Appendix 5.
3. Which Gram Panchayat is highest in terms of
GPDI and which is lowest?
The Grampanchayat with highest GPDI is Karada in
Samudrapur (GDPI: 0.672) and lowest is Kawadi
(GDPI:0.558) in Arvi.
Karada is in very high category of livelihood index,
healthy living, financial inclusion index and in the high
category of agriculture index.
Karada Grampanchayat has 82.31 % population in the
age group 18-60 years is as working. 97.1 % of
population is not addicted to any of the addiction.
Around 70 % HH have at least one member of SHG and
88.5 % population of above 6 years have bank account.
43.40 % of farmers in Karada have own land, 23.33 %
farmers have irrigated land and 6.67 % of framers are
engaged in supplementary occupation.These factors put
Karada at the top of GPDI.
While Kawadi is poor in all indices except livelihood index.
In livelihoodindexit is inveryhighcategory.Kawadihas34
% of HH with own land, 20 % of the farmers have irrigated
land and around 6.76 % of farmers are engaged in
supplementaryoccupation.Thepercentageofnon-addicted
persons is lower.Only30%HHhaveSHGmembersand65
% persons have bank account. These factor put Kawadi at
thebottomofGPDIrank.
The top 10 Grampanchayats in terms of GPDI are as
follows:
1 Samudrapur Karda 0.672
2 Karanja Jasapur 0.652
3 Devoli Palasgaon 0.643
4 Devoli Fattepur 0.641
5 Wardha Kelapur 0.640
6 Karanja Kinhala 0.639
7 Samudrapur Lasanpur 0.637
8 Ashti LahanArvi 0.637
9 Karanja Ekarjun 0.636
10 Karanja Kajali 0.636
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of GPDI
4. Which are the top 10 Grampanchayats in
GDPI?
SN Block Gramapanchayat GPDI
13
Grampanchayat Development Scenario
5. Which are the lowest 10 Grampanchayats in
terms of GPDI?
SN Block Gram panchayat GPDI
6. Which are the middle 10 Grampanchayats in
terms of GPDI?
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of GDPI
The lowest 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Hinganghat Satefal 0.573
2 Wardha Inzapur 0.572
3 Arvi Saldara 0.572
4 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.572
5 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.572
6 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 0.571
7 Seloo Akoli 0.565
8 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.563
9 Arvi Sawangi 0.562
10 Arvi Kawadi 0.558
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of GDPI
Middle 10 Grampanchayats are decided on the basis of
median. Five Grampanchayats above median value, the
Gram Panchayat of median value and four
Grampanchayats below median value are treated as
middle Gram Panchayat. The middle 10
Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Samudrapur Sawangi(zade) 0.268
2 Seloo Sukali(station) 0.198
3 Arvi Parsodi(tembhari) 0.229
4 Karanja Selgaon (umate) 0.291
5 Arvi Dahegaon (gondi) 0.228
6 Devoli Babulgaon 0.175
7 Ashti Pilapur 0.204
8 Devoli Hiwra kaware 0.190
9 Seloo Juwadi 0.170
10 Wardha Lonsawali 0.224
Figure 2.1 provides the number of Grampanchayats in
each category in different blocks.
SN Block Grampanchayat GPDI
7. How many Grampanchayats are in very high,
high, middle and poor category in different
blocks?
Figure 2.1 : GPDI: Number of GPs in each category, block wise
2
12
26 8
3 557
5
7 3
655
4
4
9
32 5
69
172
23
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very High High Medium Low
The block Devoli has highest number of
Grampanchayats in very high category and block Ashti
and Hinganghat have two Grampanchayats with very
high GDPI. The Ashti and Devoli block has no
Grampanchayat in poor category. Further, maximum
number of Grampanchayats in the poor category are in
Hinganghat block while minimum in Samudrapur,
Karanja, Seloo. It is to be remembered that on the basis
of this number, the implications about overall
development of the block cannot be drawn as this
Wardha Development Report
14
Agriculture
and
Irrigation
Index
Livelihood Education Healthy Financial Household
Index Index living Inclusion Infrastruc- GPDI
SN Block GP Index Index cture Index
14 Samudrapur Wadgaon 0.335 0.810 0.580 0.719 0.748 0.715 0.625
15 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.143 0.771 0.566 0.734 0.745 0.668 0.624
16 Ashti Bhishnur 0.245 0.747 0.528 0.874 0.444 0.713 0.624
17 Devoli Bopapur 0.184 0.795 0.577 0.748 0.780 0.845 0.623
18 Wardha Nimgaon 0.289 0.712 0.576 0.797 0.700 0.778 0.623
19 Devoli Chikhali 0.217 0.831 0.578 0.719 0.697 0.821 0.621
20 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.278 0.864 0.531 0.703 0.748 0.713 0.621
21 Devoli Nagzari 0.293 0.731 0.593 0.730 0.704 0.794 0.619
Very High High Medium Low
� There are Grampanchayats, which are in poor
category in education, health, financial inclusion
and household infrastructure index but in very high
category in livelihood index. There is a possibility
that people in these Grampanchayat are either not
earning enough through livelihood or not spending
on education or household infrastructure, but
spending on addiction.
Wardha Development Report
16
SN Block GP
Agriculture& Irrigation
Index
LivelihoodIndex
EducationIndex
HealthylivingIndex
FinancialInclusion
Index
HouseholdInfrastru-
ctureIndex
GPDI
1 Samudrapur Karda 0.245 0.823 0.576 0.971 0.782 0.707 0.672
2 Karanja Jasapur 0.416 0.742 0.587 0.883 0.532 0.732 0.652
3 Devoli Palasgaon 0.293 0.700 0.622 0.796 0.740 0.864 0.643
4 Devoli Fattepur 0.234 0.779 0.591 0.800 0.798 0.800 0.641
5 Wardha Kelapur 0.309 0.718 0.584 0.802 0.778 0.796 0.640
6 Karanja Kinhala 0.337 0.741 0.604 0.798 0.682 0.745 0.639
7 Samudrapur Lasanpur 0.306 0.806 0.575 0.806 0.691 0.692 0.637
8 Ashti Lahan arvi 0.342 0.649 0.627 0.889 0.568 0.784 0.637
9 Karanja Ekarjun 0.347 0.784 0.576 0.828 0.627 0.664 0.636
10 Karanja Kajali 0.337 0.774 0.587 0.810 0.654 0.686 0.636
11 Devoli Amboda 0.236 0.848 0.580 0.836 0.613 0.738 0.635
12 Devoli Wabgaon 0.228 0.746 0.592 0.804 0.781 0.817 0.634
13 Samudrapur Waigaon (Gond) 0.313 0.803 0.571 0.791 0.670 0.717 0.634
14 Seloo Wadgaon (Jangli) 0.268 0.773 0.595 0.798 0.745 0.723 0.634
15 Wardha Bhivapur 0.345 0.693 0.589 0.745 0.725 0.842 0.631
16 Karanja Parsodi 0.324 0.816 0.584 0.806 0.617 0.623 0.630
17 Devoli Kajalsara 0.217 0.737 0.581 0.747 0.803 0.810 0.629
18 Devoli Loni 0.304 0.754 0.565 0.727 0.803 0.788 0.629
19 Hinganghat Kajalsara 0.200 0.756 0.586 0.739 0.803 0.757 0.629
20 Samudrapur Tas 0.320 0.817 0.569 0.738 0.717 0.685 0.629
21 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.311 0.766 0.614 0.879 0.567 0.573 0.628
22 Seloo Wadgaon khurd 0.298 0.727 0.587 0.808 0.656 0.779 0.628
23 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.305 0.771 0.559 0.710 0.767 0.815 0.627
24 Devoli Agargaon 0.234 0.763 0.596 0.805 0.703 0.752 0.625
25 Samudrapur Wadgaon 0.335 0.810 0.580 0.719 0.748 0.715 0.625
26 Devoli Pimpalgaon 0.235 0.732 0.595 0.783 0.745 0.804 0.624
27 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.143 0.771 0.566 0.734 0.745 0.668 0.624
28 Ashti Bhishnur 0.245 0.747 0.528 0.874 0.444 0.713 0.624
29 Devoli Bopapur 0.184 0.795 0.577 0.748 0.780 0.845 0.623
30 Wardha Nimgaon 0.289 0.712 0.576 0.797 0.700 0.778 0.623
31 Wardha Dahegaon miskin 0.290 0.742 0.570 0.760 0.748 0.747 0.622
32 Devoli Chikhali 0.217 0.831 0.578 0.719 0.697 0.821 0.621
33 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.278 0.864 0.531 0.703 0.748 0.713 0.621
Annexure 2.1: GPDI and dimension indices
17
Grampanchayat Development Scenario
SN Block GP
Agriculture& Irrigation
Index
LivelihoodIndex
EducationIndex
HealthylivingIndex
FinancialInclusion
Index
HouseholdInfrastru-
ctureIndex
GPDI
34 Wardha Talegaon(Ta) 0.335 0.728 0.593 0.758 0.600 0.774 0.620
35 Devoli Nagzari 0.293 0.731 0.593 0.730 0.704 0.794 0.619
36 Seloo Zadshi 0.238 0.786 0.579 0.774 0.708 0.724 0.619
37 Samudrapur Ubda 0.263 0.802 0.571 0.773 0.644 0.721 0.618
38 Samudrapur Washi 0.240 0.806 0.572 0.755 0.682 0.756 0.618
39 Karanja Bondar Thana 0.350 0.793 0.555 0.817 0.559 0.578 0.617
40 Seloo Waghala 0.255 0.765 0.585 0.762 0.725 0.711 0.617
41 Wardha Peth 0.265 0.697 0.601 0.771 0.671 0.838 0.617
42 Seloo Takali(Kite) 0.187 0.816 0.559 0.801 0.783 0.649 0.616
43 Karanja Sawal 0.355 0.798 0.553 0.782 0.590 0.593 0.616
44 Ashti Ranwadi 0.246 0.717 0.587 0.853 0.636 0.711 0.615
45 Arvi Sorta 0.180 0.701 0.611 0.814 0.728 0.795 0.614
46 Karanja Sawli Kh 0.329 0.761 0.596 0.783 0.593 0.608 0.614
47 Ashti Tarasawanga 0.323 0.712 0.579 0.823 0.589 0.674 0.614
48 Devoli Yesgaon 0.264 0.689 0.587 0.694 0.772 0.879 0.612
49 Seloo Salai(Kala) 0.188 0.820 0.564 0.807 0.707 0.655 0.612
50 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 0.247 0.734 0.589 0.783 0.662 0.757 0.612
51 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 0.179 0.779 0.576 0.801 0.679 0.763 0.611
52 Karanja Bihadi 0.291 0.750 0.587 0.861 0.545 0.584 0.611
53 Karanja Selgaon lawane 0.326 0.752 0.582 0.759 0.620 0.652 0.611
54 Seloo Helodi 0.220 0.803 0.576 0.774 0.651 0.708 0.611
55 Wardha Tigaon 0.227 0.756 0.557 0.754 0.717 0.803 0.611
56 Ashti Wadala 0.306 0.730 0.545 0.814 0.582 0.738 0.611
57 Ashti Navin Ashti 0.248 0.496 0.692 0.917 0.553 0.842 0.610
58 Devoli Chinchala 0.201 0.763 0.576 0.736 0.723 0.823 0.610
59 Samudrapur Nirgudi 0.270 0.740 0.522 0.834 0.704 0.659 0.610
60 Wardha Dhotra(Ste) 0.292 0.683 0.559 0.772 0.717 0.768 0.610
61 Karanja Dhawasa 0.352 0.774 0.576 0.796 0.560 0.539 0.610
62 Devoli Borgaon Aloda 0.193 0.755 0.587 0.761 0.741 0.756 0.609
63 Ashti Parsoda 0.224 0.671 0.598 0.849 0.609 0.788 0.608
64 Ashti Sahur 0.246 0.712 0.593 0.822 0.574 0.758 0.608
65 Arvi Belhara 0.324 0.787 0.573 0.781 0.484 0.659 0.607
66 Devoli Sendari 0.201 0.789 0.583 0.774 0.577 0.796 0.607
Wardha Development Report
18
SN Block GP
Agriculture& Irrigation
Index
LivelihoodIndex
EducationIndex
HealthylivingIndex
FinancialInclusion
Index
HouseholdInfrastru-
ctureIndex
GPDI
67 Ashti Drugwada 0.221 0.732 0.571 0.811 0.585 0.796 0.605
68 Samudrapur Dhondgaon 0.252 0.786 0.554 0.740 0.683 0.707 0.605
69 Seloo Dindoda 0.242 0.766 0.561 0.772 0.712 0.652 0.605
70 Wardha Paloti 0.243 0.716 0.596 0.754 0.631 0.802 0.605
71 Arvi Borgaon 0.220 0.738 0.582 0.826 0.647 0.664 0.604
72 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 0.268 0.800 0.571 0.694 0.660 0.712 0.604
73 Seloo Sukali(Station) 0.198 0.787 0.574 0.798 0.620 0.711 0.604
74 Arvi Parsodi(Tembhari) 0.229 0.717 0.578 0.812 0.666 0.693 0.603
75 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 0.291 0.808 0.537 0.777 0.620 0.581 0.603
76 Arvi Dahegaon (Gondi) 0.228 0.740 0.576 0.809 0.584 0.729 0.602
77 Devoli Babulgaon 0.175 0.765 0.544 0.793 0.764 0.705 0.602
78 Ashti Pilapur 0.204 0.798 0.528 0.922 0.413 0.683 0.600
79 Devoli Hiwra Kaware 0.190 0.753 0.539 0.718 0.891 0.714 0.600
80 Seloo Juwadi 0.170 0.773 0.567 0.817 0.684 0.657 0.600
81 Wardha Lonsawali 0.224 0.789 0.542 0.696 0.712 0.785 0.600
82 Devoli Vijaygopal 0.175 0.705 0.578 0.796 0.721 0.764 0.599
83 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 0.290 0.808 0.553 0.780 0.564 0.567 0.599
84 Karanja Kundi 0.302 0.701 0.613 0.784 0.602 0.591 0.599
85 Karanja Pardi 0.279 0.745 0.589 0.808 0.550 0.600 0.599
86 Samudrapur Khandala 0.271 0.648 0.579 0.832 0.544 0.774 0.598
87 Wardha ANJI(Moti) 0.251 0.644 0.611 0.782 0.608 0.800 0.598
88 Arvi Bedhona 0.313 0.713 0.554 0.802 0.558 0.640 0.597
89 Arvi Dahegaon Mustafa 0.258 0.759 0.507 0.794 0.498 0.653 0.597
90 Arvi Panjara Bothali 0.189 0.822 0.593 0.797 0.532 0.641 0.597
91 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.176 0.826 0.555 0.785 0.634 0.649 0.597
92 Hinganghat Allipur 0.265 0.725 0.597 0.799 0.413 0.777 0.596
93 Samudrapur Nandori 0.199 0.783 0.581 0.741 0.625 0.723 0.596
94 Wardha Selukate 0.226 0.708 0.573 0.763 0.634 0.781 0.596
95 Hinganghat Fukata 0.241 0.756 0.581 0.788 0.535 0.684 0.595
96 Hinganghat Veni 0.218 0.767 0.580 0.791 0.524 0.711 0.595
97 Wardha Ganeshpur 0.283 0.759 0.531 0.728 0.652 0.691 0.595
98 Ashti Thar 0.235 0.759 0.535 0.810 0.631 0.641 0.595
99 Arvi Deurwada 0.192 0.680 0.609 0.849 0.516 0.767 0.594
19
Grampanchayat Development Scenario
SN Block GP
Agriculture& Irrigation
Index
LivelihoodIndex
EducationIndex
HealthylivingIndex
FinancialInclusion
Index
HouseholdInfrastru-
ctureIndex
GPDI
100 Hinganghat Dhamangaon 0.288 0.784 0.538 0.783 0.466 0.684 0.594
101 Hinganghat Jamani 0.250 0.788 0.572 0.761 0.543 0.652 0.594
102 Hinganghat Yenora 0.209 0.749 0.602 0.729 0.657 0.710 0.594
103 Wardha Dhamangaon 0.313 0.731 0.559 0.782 0.466 0.776 0.594
104 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 0.260 0.693 0.601 0.715 0.670 0.737 0.594
105 Arvi Bhadod 0.253 0.573 0.573 0.748 0.451 0.685 0.593
106 Devoli Talni (Khanderao) 0.194 0.759 0.548 0.719 0.711 0.774 0.593
107 Ashti Pandhurna 0.222 0.799 0.524 0.796 0.648 0.595 0.592
108 Seloo Deulgaon 0.212 0.815 0.537 0.768 0.624 0.635 0.592
109 Seloo Jaypur 0.169 0.763 0.573 0.763 0.686 0.702 0.592
110 Ashti Bambarda 0.267 0.738 0.528 0.809 0.568 0.658 0.591
111 Hinganghat Pohana 0.191 0.776 0.591 0.811 0.495 0.691 0.590
112 Hinganghat Shekapur(Mo) 0.219 0.769 0.581 0.765 0.591 0.642 0.590
113 Hinganghat Wela 0.236 0.700 0.601 0.777 0.570 0.699 0.590
114 Seloo Khadaki 0.156 0.813 0.540 0.766 0.635 0.714 0.590
115 Wardha Satoda 0.188 0.624 0.627 0.793 0.650 0.764 0.588
116 Arvi Bodad 0.187 0.754 0.589 0.779 0.571 0.680 0.587
117 Arvi Umari (Sukali) 0.255 0.802 0.546 0.739 0.516 0.668 0.587
118 Hinganghat Sawli Wagh 0.220 0.764 0.586 0.753 0.496 0.724 0.587
119 Wardha Bodad 0.292 0.682 0.599 0.833 0.571 0.826 0.587
120 Seloo Saldoh 0.183 0.702 0.576 0.787 0.642 0.723 0.586
121 Arvi Salfal 0.196 0.772 0.560 0.791 0.579 0.628 0.585
122 Samudrapur Sewa 0.241 0.829 0.527 0.695 0.616 0.647 0.585
123 Arvi Malegaon Theka 0.230 0.722 0.586 0.779 0.485 0.723 0.584
124 Arvi Rohana 0.173 0.678 0.606 0.827 0.553 0.715 0.584
125 Hinganghat Khangaon 0.249 0.746 0.594 0.747 0.552 0.615 0.584
126 Hinganghat Warud 0.256 0.765 0.565 0.791 0.434 0.650 0.584
127 Wardha Wadadh 0.275 0.724 0.570 0.732 0.445 0.794 0.584
128 Seloo Kopara 0.182 0.764 0.576 0.753 0.591 0.685 0.583
129 Hinganghat Jangona 0.273 0.758 0.576 0.803 0.392 0.608 0.582
130 Hinganghat Donduda 0.244 0.783 0.561 0.742 0.532 0.614 0.581
131 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.250 0.779 0.568 0.773 0.442 0.629 0.581
132 Hinganghat Gadegaon 0.249 0.747 0.574 0.762 0.490 0.641 0.580
Wardha Development Report
20
SN Block GP
Agriculture& Irrigation
Index
LivelihoodIndex
EducationIndex
HealthylivingIndex
FinancialInclusion
Index
HouseholdInfrastru-
ctureIndex
GPDI
133 Hinganghat Kapshi 0.224 0.742 0.582 0.801 0.444 0.655 0.580
134 Hinganghat Rohankheda 0.195 0.745 0.604 0.741 0.552 0.680 0.580
135 Arvi Morangana 0.174 0.727 0.577 0.807 0.524 0.683 0.578
136 Hinganghat Wadner 0.195 0.717 0.601 0.785 0.468 0.712 0.578
137 Hinganghat Wani 0.182 0.766 0.583 0.723 0.587 0.673 0.577
138 Hinganghat Yerla 0.208 0.769 0.579 0.748 0.408 0.740 0.576
139 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 0.188 0.610 0.625 0.789 0.586 0.737 0.575
140 Karanja Kannamwar Gram 0.147 0.807 0.558 0.819 0.525 0.559 0.574
141 Hinganghat Satefal 0.245 0.779 0.590 0.684 0.446 0.689 0.573
142 Hinganghat Umari 0.210 0.764 0.545 0.718 0.600 0.661 0.573
143 Karanja Umari 0.305 0.758 0.576 0.828 0.600 0.508 0.573
144 Arvi Saldara 0.207 0.832 0.508 0.790 0.461 0.582 0.572
145 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.226 0.787 0.564 0.763 0.391 0.648 0.572
146 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.339 0.770 0.575 0.775 0.391 0.749 0.572
147 Wardha Inzapur 0.204 0.686 0.574 0.728 0.583 0.751 0.572
148 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 0.216 0.772 0.568 0.723 0.485 0.666 0.571
149 Seloo Akoli 0.255 0.812 0.501 0.716 0.496 0.581 0.565
150 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.219 0.784 0.542 0.799 0.345 0.596 0.563
151 Arvi Sawangi 0.200 0.784 0.520 0.766 0.482 0.595 0.562
152 Arvi Kawadi 0.203 0.802 0.533 0.726 0.482 0.571 0.558
21
Grampanchayat Development Scenario
Agriculture,
irrigation and
livelihood
3.
Agriculture is the backbone of the livelihood security system of nearly 700 million people in the country andwe need to build our food security on the foundation of home grown food.
- "Agri Quotes".Zeenews India.
Agriculture is the backbone of development of villages
in India. The present chapter provides the findings
related to Agriculture and irrigation index as well as
Livelihood index.
The dimension wise indices gave causal analysis of for
the development of status of Grampanchayat. For
example, a Grampanchayat might be in 'high' category
of GPDI but might be in 'poor' category as far as
dimension of agricultural and irrigation index is
considered. The district administration, in this case, is
required to provide irrigation facility and pay more
attention to developing awareness about supplementary
occupation among the farmers. Thus the dimension wise
indices provide the sectors where the district
administration need to focus.
The first step is organization of all Grampanchayat on
the basis of descending dimension wise index
(Grampanchayats with highest index at the top and with
least index in the bottom). Then the four quartiles
(Categories) of villages are formed by using standard
statistical method. The details of each category are as
follows:
1 Quartile 1 Top 38 Very High
2 Quartile 2 Middle 38 High
3 Quartile 3 Lower Middle 38
Grampanchayats
4 Quartile 4 Lowest 38
Grampanchayats
The above classification will provide a clear guideline to
the district administrators regarding the sectors in the
Grampanchayat where they need to intervene.
Grampanchayats
Grampanchayats
Medium
Poor
1 What was the use of dimension wise index?
2 How the Grampanchayats are categorised on
the basis of Dimension wise index?
Category Quartile Details Category
NameNumber
3.Which indicators are used to find Agricultural and
irrigation index?
4. Which Grampanchayat is highest in terms of
Agriculture and irrigation index and which is
lowest?
5 Which are the top 10 Grampanchayats in
Agriculture and irrigation index?
Agriculture
SN and irrigation
index
Block Gramapanchayat
Following indicators are used to find the agricultural
and irrigation index:
1. Percentage of households with own land
2. Percentageof farmers' households with irrigated land
3. Percentage of farmers doing supplementary
occupation
The Grampanchayats with their Agriculture and
irrigation index are given in Annexure 3.1 at the end of
this chapter.
The Grampanchayat with highest Agriculture and
Irrigation index is Jasapur in Karanja Block
(Agriculture and Irrigation Index: 0.416) and lowest is
Pimpalgaon in Hinganghat block (Agriculture and
Irrigation Index: 0.143).
The top 10 Grampanchayats in terms of Agriculture and
Irrigation index are as follows:
1 Karanja Jasapur 0.416
2 Karanja Sawal 0.355
3 Karanja Dhawasa 0.352
4 Karanja Bondar thana 0.350
5 Karanja Ekarjun 0.347
6 Wardha Bhivapur 0.345
7 Ashti Lahan arvi 0.342
8 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.339
9 Karanja Kajali 0.337
10 Karanja Kinhala 0.337
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
23
Agriculture, irrigation and livelihood
7 Which are the middle 10 Grampanchayatsin
Agriculture and irrigation index?
SN Block Grampanchayats Agricultureand
irrigationindex
The middle 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
See Pge No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
1 Ashti Bhishnur 0.245
2 Hinganghat Satefal 0.245
3 Samudrapur Karda 0.245
4 Hinganghat Donduda 0.244
5 Wardha Paloti 0.243
6 Seloo Dindoda 0.242
7 Hinganghat Fukata 0.241
8 Samudrapur Sewa 0.241
9 Samudrapur Washi 0.240
10 Seloo Zadshi 0.238
6 Which are the lowest 10 Grampanchayats in
Agriculture and irrigation index?
SN Block Grampanchayats Agricultureand
irrigationindex
See Pge No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
The lowest 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.176
2 Devoli Babulgaon 0.175
3 Devoli Vijaygopal 0.175
4 Arvi Morangana 0.174
5 Arvi Rohana 0.173
6 Seloo Juwadi 0.170
7 Seloo Jaypur 0.169
8 Seloo Khadaki 0.156
9 Karanja Kannamwar gram 0.147
10 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.143
2 3 4
16
51
735 1 10
1
7
3
8
54
7
12
2
4
49
1
9
6
1
19
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very High High Medium Low
8. How many Grampanchayats in different block are in very high, high, middle and poor category in terms
ofAgricultural and irrigation index?
Figure 3.1 : Number of Grampanchayats in each category of Agriculture and irrigation index, block wise
Figure 3.1 provides the picture of block wise status of Grampanchayats
Wardha Development Report
24
Thus Karnaja block has maximum number of
Grampanchayat with very high Agricultural and
irrigation index and Seloo block have only one
Grampanchayat with very high index. The data in
District Socio Economic Abstract 2014 indicates that
there are 12 small irrigation projects, 13 percolation
tanks, 34 Kolhapur bandhare, 19 other bandhare, 4409
are irrigation wells in Karanaja block, which are
comparatively more than any other blocks.
The correlation coefficient of agricultural index and
irrigated land is high (0.76) indicating the fact that
wherever irrigated land is more the development in
agriculture is more.
All the blocks except Hinganaghat have
Grampanchayats in the category of very high.
Following are the concerns emerging from Agriculture
and irrigation index:
Hinganghat block has no Gramapanchayat with
very high index
The maximum value of Agriculture and irrigation
index is 0.416 indicating a large scope for
improvement in this sector.
The range of Agriculture and irrigation index
(difference between maximum and minimum
Agriculture and irrigation index) is 0.273, which is
moderate, indicating the heterogeneity among the
Gramapanchayats.
141 (92.7 %) Gram Panchayats have less than 20 %
of farmers engaged in supplementary occupation.
The farmers doing supplementary occupation is the
major factor that is responsible for low index.
There are 34 Grampanchayats with less than 10%
of land is irrigated.
9. What is the correlation of agricultural index
and irrigated land?
10. What are the encouraging factors as seen from
Agriculture and irrigation index?
11. What are the concerns emerging from
Agriculture and irrigation index?
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
12. What are FPOs? How many farmers are
members of FPOs and what is the benefit to the
members?
13. What are the issues in Farmers' Producers
Companies (FPOs)?
�
Collectivization of producers, especially small and
marginal farmers, into producer organisations has
emerged as one of the most effective pathways to
address the many challenges of agriculture but most
importantly, improved access to investments,
technology and inputs and markets. Department of
Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture,
Govt. of India has identified farmer producer
organisation registered under the special provisions of
the Companies Act, 1956 as the most appropriate
institutional form around which to mobilize farmers and
build their capacity to collectively leverage their
production and marketing strength.
The purpose of the project is to collectivise farmers,
especially small producers, at various levels across
several states, so as to foster technology penetration,
improve productivity, enable improved access to inputs
and services and increase farmer incomes, thereby
strengthening their sustainable agriculture based
livelihoods
To build a prosperous and sustainable agriculture sector
by promoting and supporting member-owned producer
Organisations, that enable farmers to enhance
productivity through efficient, cost-effective and
sustainable resource use and realize higher returns for
their produce, through collective action supported by
the government, and fruitful collaboration with
academia, research agencies, civil society and the
private sector.
There are 985 farmers in the surveyed villages who are
members of FPOs.
Astruggle for obtaining license under Company act
and opening bank accounts, not getting enough
number of members due to unawareness among the
farmers about FPOs, unawareness about FPOs
among farmers
Vision :
Issues related to forming a group:
25
Agriculture, irrigation and livelihood
�
�
14. Which indicators are used to find Livelihood
index?
15. Which Grampanchayat is highest in terms of
Livelihood index and which is lowest?
16. Which are the top 10 Grampanchayatsin
Livelihood index?
Lack of knowledge about marketing strategies and
obtaining capital for agro processed units, delay in
funds for office/unit construction, unable to sell the
produce, inadequate warehouses
The groups are in infancy stage and unaware about
the working procedures. If the members feel that
the membership of FPO is beneficial to them then
only the group can continue. However lack of
knowledge about income producing activities is
evident.
The indicator used for finding livelihood index is the
percentage of working population in the age group 18 to
60 years. This age group is treated as working age and
hence considered for finding the index of livelihood. It
needs to be mentioned that in rural area there is a
possibility of people working beyond 60 years of age in
agriculture. However the upper working age limit could
not be decided due to lack of any such research. Hence
the acceptable working age limit of 18 to 60 years is
considered. The persons engaged in farming, job, self-
employment as well as agricultural labour and other
labour are considered to be working.
The Grampanchayats with their Livelihood index are
given inAnnexure 3.2 at the end of this chapter.
The Grampanchayat with highest Agriculture and
Irrigation index is Faridpur in Samudrapur Block
(Livelihood index: 0.864) and lowest is Navin Ashti in
Ashti block (Livelihood Index: 0.496).
The top 10 Grampanchayats in terms of livelihood index
are as follows:
Issues related to working:
Issues related to sustenance of the group:
SeePgeNo.6 &7forMethodologyof livelohood Index
SN Block Grampanchayat Livelihood
index
SN Block Gramapanchayat Livelihood
Index
18. Which are the middle 10 Grampanchayats in
Livelihood index?
17. Which are the lowest 10 Grampanchayats in
Livelihood index?
1 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.864
2 Devoli Amboda 0.848
3 Arvi Saldara 0.832
4 Devoli Chikhali 0.831
5 Samudrapur Sewa 0.829
6 Seloo Salai (Pevath) 0.826
7 Samudrapur Karda 0.823
8 Arvi Panjara bothali 0.822
9 Seloo Salai (Kala) 0.820
10 Samudrapur Tas 0.817
1 Arvi Deulgaon 0.680
2 Arvi Rohana 0.678
3 Ashti Parsoda 0.671
4 Ashti Lahan arvi 0.649
5 Samudrapur Khandala 0.648
6 Wardha ANJI (Moti) 0.644
7 Wardha Satoda 0.624
8 Wardha Umari (Meghe) 0.610
9 Arvi Bhadod 0.573
10 Ashti NavinAshti 0.496
The middle 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
See Pge No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of livelohood Index
The lowest 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
See Pge No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of livelohood Index
Wardha Development Report
26
19. How many Grampanchayats in different block
are in very high, high, middle and poor category in
terms of Livelihood index?
Thus Samudrapur block has maximum number of
Grampanchayats with very high Livelihood index and
Ashti, Hinganaghat and Wardha blocks have two or one
Grampanchayat with very high index. It is to be
remembered that on the basis of this number, the
implications about overall livelihood of the block
cannot be drawn as this analysis is based on sampled
Grampanchayat and not all Grampanchayatsin each
block.
Figure 3.2 provides the picture of block wise status of
Grampanchayats.
SN Block Grampanchayats Livelihood
Index
1 Seloo Kopara 0.764
2 Devoli Chinchala 0.763
3 Devoli Agargaon 0.763
4 Seloo Jaypur 0.763
5 Karanja Sawli kh 0.761
6 Wardha Ganeshpur 0.759
7 Arvi Dahegaon Mustafa 0.759
8 Ashti Thar 0.759
9 Devoli Talni (Khanderao) 0.759
10 Hinganghat Jangona 0.758
Figure 3.2 : Number of Grampanchayats in each category of Livelihood index, block wise
52
42
6
10 9
1
26
155
3 6
1
4
5
8
8
6 1
5
8
6
3
3
1
12
14
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Arvi Ashti Devoli Hinganghat Karanja Samudrapur Seloo Wardha
Very High High Medium Low
20. What is the occupational status of population in
all blocks?
� Maximum population in the surveyed villages is
engaged in labour work (43.8 %) followed by
farming (14.7 %). Maximum population in farming
is found in GPs of Samudrapur and minimum in
GPs ofArvi.
�
�
Agricultural labour are more in GPs of
Samudrapur.
Around 2-6 percent of the population is engaged in
job. (Table 3.1)
27
Agriculture, irrigation and livelihood
21. What are the encouraging factors as seen from
Livelihood index?
�
�
�
All the blocks have Grampanchayats in the
category of very high.
27 out of 152 Grampanchayats have more than 80
% of population engaged in one or the other form of
livelihood activity which is a welcome sign.
The index of livelihood have higher values than
education index. This is obvious as livelihood is the
question of survival.
22. What are the concerns emerging from
Livelihood index?
�
�
Following are the concerns emerging from Livelihood
index:
The range of Livelihood index (difference between
maximum and minimumAgriculture and irrigation
index) is 0.368, which is slightly to higher side,
indicating the heterogeneity among the
Grampanchayats in terms of proportion of working
population.
There is one Grampanchayat in which less than 60
% of the working age population is involved in
livelihood activities.
Table 3.1 Population (18-60 years) engaged in different occupations/activities
BlockPersons in
OccupationFarming
Salgadi/Agriculture
labour
JobSelf
employedLabourwork
StudentHousewife
NoneRowTotal
Number 1033 804 276 346 6437 1137 1664 294 11991
Percentage 8.6% 6.7% 2.3% 2.9% 53.7% 9.5% 13.9% 2.5% 100.0%
Number 1831 275 296 186 4788 1006 1623 378 10383
Percentage 17.6% 2.6% 2.9% 1.8% 46.1% 9.7% 15.6% 3.6% 100.0%
Number 2109 1097 262 300 6143 1394 1601 296 13202
Percentage 16.1% 8.3% 2.0% 2.3% 46.5% 10.6% 12.1% 2.2% 100.0%
Number 5558 1156 727 749 12657 2876 3413 597 27733
Percentage 20.0% 4.2% 2.6% 2.7% 45.6% 10.4% 12.3% 2.2% 100.0%
Number 2227 255 320 273 6436 1442 1184 271 12408
Percentage 17.9% 2.1% 2.6% 2.2% 51.9% 11.6% 9.5% 2.2% 100.0%
Number 2605 1984 331 291 4717 1145 928 282 12283
Percentage 21.2% 16.2% 2.7% 2.4% 38.4% 9.3% 7.6% 2.3% 100.0%
Number 1948 1220 339 260 5423 1050 1172 340 11752
Percentage 16.6% 10.4% 2.9% 2.2% 46.1% 8.9% 10.0% 2.9% 100%
Number 2917 2434 1284 1373 9769 2631 4439 1108 25955
Percentage 11.2% 9.4% 4.9% 5.3% 37.6% 10.1% 17.1% 4.3% 100.0%
Number 16706 7378 4512 3908 49739 11724 16088 3600 113655
Percentage 14.7 % 6.5 % 4.0 % 3.4 % 43.8 % 10.3 % 10.4 % 3.2% 100%
Arvi
Ashti
Devoli
Hinganghat
Karanja
Samudrapur
Seloo
Wardha
ColumnTotal
Source: Survey by YASHADA, 2017
Wardha Development Report
28
Annexure 3.1: Grampanchayat with Agriculture and irrigation index
29
Agriculture, irrigation and livelihood
SN. Block GP
Agricultureand
IrrigationIndex
% ofHH withown land
% ofHH withirrigated
land
% of HH doingsupplementary
occupation
% ofworking
population
1 Karanja Jasapur 0.416 65.17% 50.38% 9.16% 74.20%
2 Karanja Sawal 0.355 59.16% 42.31% 5.13% 79.84%
3 Karanja Dhawasa 0.352 58.46% 42.14% 5.03% 77.37%
4 Karanja Bondar Thana 0.350 62.76% 36.41% 5.98% 79.29%
5 Karanja Ekarjun 0.347 70.70% 31.08% 2.39% 78.40%
6 Wardha Bhivapur 0.345 56.83% 35.78% 11.01% 69.27%
7 Ashti Lahan Arvi 0.342 60.99% 32.70% 8.81% 64.89%
8 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.339 67.01% 20.00% 14.63% 76.98%
9 Karanja Kajali 0.337 37.61% 53.03% 10.61% 77.40%
10 Karanja Kinhala 0.337 57.84% 41.53% 1.69% 74.15%
11 Wardha Talegaon(Ta) 0.335 48.19% 40.12% 12.18% 72.75%
12 Samudrapur Wadgaon 0.335 59.02% 32.37% 8.97% 81.00%
13 Karanja Sawli Kh 0.329 48.69% 40.78% 9.22% 76.09%
14 Karanja Selgaon Lawane 0.326 56.30% 34.52% 7.10% 75.22%
15 Karanja Parsodi 0.324 42.86% 44.66% 9.71% 81.61%
16 Arvi Belhara 0.324 57.14% 27.27% 12.64% 78.00%
17 Ashti Tarasawanga 0.323 63.06% 31.45% 2.37% 71.24%
18 Samudrapur Tas 0.320 56.85% 28.36% 10.95% 81.70%
19 Samudrapur Waigaon (Gond) 0.313 71.65% 16.00% 6.40% 80.27%
20 Arvi Bedhona 0.313 55.00% 7.70% 29.20% 71.31%
21 Wardha Dhamangaon 0.313 45.42% 24.62% 23.85% 73.14%
22 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.311 57.86% 30.11% 5.38% 76.60%
23 Wardha Kelapur 0.309 55.36% 19.38% 17.83% 71.77%
24 Ashti Wadala 0.306 50.15% 31.11% 10.56% 72.96%
25 Samudrapur Lasanpur 0.306 59.45% 20.45% 11.90% 80.56%
26 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.305 65.97% 14.73% 10.85% 77.05%
27 Karanja Umari 0.305 59.07% 29.39% 3.07% 75.77%
28 Devoli Loni 0.304 56.87% 16.78% 17.45% 75.36%
29 Karanja Kundi 0.302 47.18% 35.82% 7.46% 70.07%
30 Seloo Wadgaon Khurd 0.298 52.13% 24.67% 12.67% 72.71%
31 Devoli Palasgaon 0.293 56.45% 19.82% 11.71% 70.02%
32 Devoli Nagzari 0.293 60.52% 15.28% 12.04% 73.05%
Wardha Development Report
30
SN. Block GP
Agricultureand
IrrigationIndex
% ofHH withown land
% ofHH withirrigated
land
% of HH doingsupplementary
occupation
% ofworking
population
33 Wardha Dhotra(Ste) 0.292 46.35% 27.17% 14.13% 68.31%
34 Wardha Bodad 0.292 36.28% 35.71% 15.48% 68.23%
35 Karanja Bihadi 0.291 57.85% 24.84% 4.58% 75.00%
36 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 0.291 40.65% 38.76% 7.75% 80.84%
37 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 0.290 47.87% 34.07% 5.19% 80.77%
38 Wardha Dahegaon Miskin 0.290 51.27% 20.27% 15.51% 74.20%
39 Wardha Nimgaon 0.289 46.59% 21.18% 18.82% 71.23%
40 Hinganghat Dhamangaon 0.288 44.05% 22.02% 20.18% 78.37%
41 Wardha Ganeshpur 0.283 41.48% 23.23% 20.20% 75.94%
42 Karanja Pardi 0.279 50.90% 27.06% 5.88% 74.53%
43 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.278 51.55% 16.20% 15.54% 86.43%
44 Wardha Wadadh 0.275 52.10% 20.65% 9.68% 72.42%
45 Hinganghat Jangona 0.273 57.04% 18.88% 6.02% 75.80%
46 Samudrapur Khandala 0.271 52.76% 21.55% 6.90% 64.84%
47 Samudrapur Nirgudi 0.270 50.51% 18.63% 11.76% 74.02%
48 Seloo Wadgaon(Jangli) 0.268 54.35% 14.29% 11.90% 77.32%
49 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 0.268 48.12% 24.10% 8.21% 79.95%
50 Ashti Bambarda 0.267 48.97% 5.30% 25.76% 73.82%
51 Hinganghat Allipur 0.265 47.85% 19.89% 11.76% 72.45%
52 Wardha Peth 0.265 49.76% 13.89% 15.74% 69.66%
53 Devoli Yesgaon 0.264 59.84% 12.82% 6.41% 68.93%
54 Samudrapur Ubda 0.263 33.70% 28.85% 16.35% 80.18%
55 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 0.260 33.66% 28.20% 16.16% 69.34%
56 Arvi Dahegaon Mustafa 0.258 47.61% 19.12% 10.78% 75.91%
57 Hinganghat Warud 0.256 57.91% 13.09% 5.76% 76.49%
58 Seloo Akoli 0.255 38.69% 16.38% 21.55% 81.23%
59 Arvi Umari(Sukali) 0.255 48.00% 18.87% 9.62% 80.16%
60 Seloo Waghala 0.255 51.90% 8.77% 15.79% 76.51%
61 Arvi Bhadod 0.253 56.92% 15.00% 46.12% 82.53%
62 Samudrapur Dhondgaon 0.252 49.33% 14.85% 11.39% 78.56%
63 Wardha Anji(Moti) 0.251 24.13% 30.47% 20.57% 64.40%
64 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.250 41.59% 22.96% 10.37% 77.90%
65 Hinganghat Jamani 0.250 43.77% 23.18% 7.95% 78.80%
31
Agriculture, irrigation and livelihood
% ofworking
population
66 Hinganghat Khangaon 0.249 47.68% 12.76% 14.40% 74.62%
67 Hinganghat Gadegaon 0.249 50.60% 18.39% 5.75% 74.70%
68 Ashti Navin Ashti 0.248 42.45% 23.19% 8.70% 49.62%
69 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 0.247 31.57% 19.74% 22.75% 73.37%
70 Ashti Sahur 0.246 41.20% 18.60% 14.05% 71.19%
71 Ashti Ranwadi 0.246 46.56% 16.33% 10.88% 71.72%
72 Ashti Bhishnur 0.245 61.67% 2.08% 9.90% 74.65%
73 Hinganghat Satefal 0.245 47.62% 15.85% 10.16% 77.91%
74 Samudrapur Karda 0.245 43.40% 23.33% 6.67% 82.31%
75 Hinganghat Donduda 0.244 47.14% 18.26% 7.83% 78.32%
76 Wardha Paloti 0.243 30.56% 26.52% 15.91% 71.57%
77 Seloo Dindoda 0.242 56.75% 1.38% 14.48% 76.59%
78 Hinganghat Fukata 0.241 52.09% 14.19% 6.13% 75.60%
79 Samudrapur Sewa 0.241 53.42% 9.90% 8.91% 82.93%
80 Samudrapur Washi 0.240 47.36% 19.35% 5.38% 80.65%
81 Seloo Zadshi 0.238 42.20% 13.81% 15.24% 78.59%
82 Hinganghat Wela 0.236 39.68% 17.59% 13.43% 70.01%
83 Devoli Amboda 0.236 63.33% 0.00% 7.32% 84.78%
84 Devoli Pimpalgaon 0.235 55.13% 9.74% 5.64% 73.25%
85 Ashti Thar 0.235 43.73% 13.00% 13.62% 75.88%
86 Devoli Agargaon 0.234 52.74% 7.53% 10.04% 76.31%
87 Devoli Fattepur 0.234 55.66% 8.47% 5.93% 77.94%
88 Arvi Malegaon Theka 0.230 36.76% 7.59% 24.68% 72.20%
89 Arvi Parsodi(Tembhari) 0.229 45.26% 11.49% 11.90% 71.70%
90 Devoli Wabgaon 0.228 52.31% 10.55% 5.50% 74.62%
91 Arvi Dahegaon (Gondi) 0.228 35.42% 21.48% 11.45% 74.01%
92 Wardha Tigaon 0.227 41.26% 7.22% 19.59% 75.60%
93 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.226 41.57% 17.65% 8.50% 78.70%
94 Wardha Selukate 0.226 32.82% 21.05% 13.82% 70.76%
95 Wardha Lonsawali 0.224 46.50% 18.34% 2.37% 78.93%
96 Hinganghat Kapshi 0.224 42.37% 10.95% 13.87% 75.96%
97 Ashti Parsoda 0.224 51.56% 11.48% 4.10% 67.06%
98 Ashti Pandhurna 0.222 53.29% 7.57% 5.59% 79.85%
SN. Block GP
Agricultureand
IrrigationIndex
% ofHH withown land
% ofHH withirrigated
land
% of HH doingsupplementary
occupation
Wardha Development Report
32
SN. Block GP
Agricultureand
IrrigationIndex
% ofHH withown land
% ofHH withirrigated
land
% of HH doingsupplementary
occupation
% ofworking
population
99 Ashti Drugwada 0.221 38.13% 16.50% 11.65% 73.24%
100 Hinganghat Sawli Wagh 0.220 43.14% 14.44% 8.45% 76.40%
101 Seloo Helodi 0.220 43.44% 11.27% 11.27% 80.29%
102 Arvi Borgaon 0.220 44.12% 11.96% 6.52% 73.80%
103 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.219 47.25% 13.50% 4.91% 78.40%
104 Hinganghat Shekapur (Mo) 0.219 44.63% 10.51% 10.51% 76.90%
105 Hinganghat Veni 0.218 45.80% 16.39% 3.28% 76.70%
106 Devoli Chikhali 0.217 58.42% 6.78% 0.00% 83.08%
107 Devoli Kajalsara 0.217 46.56% 11.76% 6.72% 73.69%
108 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 0.216 47.16% 10.88% 6.76% 77.22%
109 Seloo Deulgaon 0.212 43.41% 8.59% 11.66% 81.46%
110 Hinganghat Umari 0.210 39.24% 12.09% 11.54% 76.40%
111 Hinganghat Yenora 0.209 42.97% 16.38% 3.45% 74.86%
112 Hinganghat Yerla 0.208 46.37% 9.23% 6.67% 76.94%
113 Arvi Saldara 0.207 33.75% 14.55% 13.76% 83.18%
114 Wardha Inzapur 0.204 18.79% 31.51% 10.96% 68.58%
115 Ashti Pilapur 0.204 31.25% 22.00% 8.00% 79.82%
116 Arvi Kawadi 0.203 33.97% 20.27% 6.76% 80.15%
117 Devoli Chinchala 0.201 53.90% 3.90% 2.60% 76.32%
118 Devoli Sendari 0.201 48.54% 3.53% 8.24% 78.89%
119 Hinganghat Kajalsara 0.200 43.30% 3.74% 13.08% 75.60%
120 Arvi Sawangi 0.200 38.14% 8.70% 13.04% 78.39%
121 Samudrapur Nandori 0.199 28.75% 16.88% 13.92% 78.29%
122 Seloo Sukali (Station) 0.198 38.42% 5.97% 14.93% 78.68%
123 Arvi Salfal 0.196 32.27% 13.70% 12.86% 77.21%
124 Hinganghat Rohankheda 0.195 44.15% 10.81% 3.60% 74.50%
125 Hinganghat Wadner 0.195 34.77% 15.07% 8.55% 71.70%
126 Devoli Talni (Khanderao) 0.194 43.27% 11.83% 3.23% 75.88%
127 Devoli Borgaon Aloda 0.193 48.70% 5.19% 3.90% 75.48%
128 Arvi Deurwada 0.192 37.75% 12.32% 7.46% 67.99%
129 Hinganghat Pohana 0.191 37.04% 10.79% 9.54% 76.70%
130 Devoli Hiwra Kaware 0.190 51.44% 2.05% 3.42% 75.33%
131 Arvi Panjara Bothali 0.189 31.88% 14.49% 10.37% 82.24%
33
Agriculture, irrigation and livelihood
SN. Block GP
Agricultureand
IrrigationIndex
% ofHH withown land
% ofHH withirrigated
land
% of HH doingsupplementary
occupation
% ofworking
population
132 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 0.188 18.90% 20.13% 17.45% 60.98%
133 Seloo Salai(Kala) 0.188 48.97% 1.05% 6.32% 81.99%
134 Wardha Satoda 0.188 17.67% 23.68% 14.91% 62.42%
135 Arvi Bodad 0.187 39.73% 14.75% 1.64% 75.38%
136 Seloo Takali(Kite) 0.187 45.45% 4.55% 6.06% 81.61%
137 Devoli Bopapur 0.184 48.31% 5.83% 0.97% 79.46%
138 Seloo Saldoh 0.183 33.86% 12.03% 9.02% 70.25%
139 Seloo Kopara 0.182 46.42% 3.01% 5.26% 76.38%
140 Hinganghat Wani 0.182 32.24% 11.11% 11.11% 76.60%
141 Arvi Sorta 0.180 32.11% 11.71% 10.28% 70.13%
142 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 0.179 41.18% 5.84% 6.57% 77.86%
143 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.176 45.83% 3.03% 4.08% 82.59%
144 Devoli Babulgaon 0.175 44.23% 5.21% 3.13% 76.50%
145 Devoli Vijaygopal 0.175 39.61% 3.85% 9.09% 70.45%
146 Arvi Morangana 0.174 20.75% 11.02% 20.33% 72.68%
147 Arvi Rohana 0.173 28.74% 13.53% 9.58% 67.83%
148 Seloo Juwadi 0.170 42.91% 3.28% 4.92% 77.29%
149 Seloo Jaypur 0.169 37.69% 4.95% 7.92% 76.29%
150 Seloo Khadaki 0.156 33.33% 7.63% 5.93% 81.26%
151 Karanja Kannamwar Gram 0.147 25.61% 14.43% 4.12% 80.66%
152 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.143 20.45% 15.38% 6.92% 77.10%
Annexure 3.2 : Gramapanchayats with Livelihood Index
S.No. Block GPLivelihood
Index% of working
population
1 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.864 86.43%
2 Devoli Amboda 0.848 84.78%
3 Arvi Saldara 0.832 83.18%
4 Devoli Chikhali 0.831 83.08%
5 Samudrapur Sewa 0.829 82.93%
6 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.826 82.59%
7 Samudrapur Karda 0.823 82.31%
8 Arvi Panjara Bothali 0.822 82.24%
9 Seloo Salai(Kala) 0.820 81.99%
10 Samudrapur Tas 0.817 81.70%
11 Seloo Takali(Kite) 0.816 81.61%
12 Karanja Parsodi 0.816 81.61%
13 Seloo Deulgaon 0.815 81.46%
14 Seloo Khadaki 0.813 81.26%
15 Seloo Akoli 0.812 81.23%
16 Samudrapur Wadgaon 0.810 81.00%
17 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 0.808 80.84%
18 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 0.808 80.77%
19 Karanja Kannamwar Gram 0.807 80.66%
20 Samudrapur Washi 0.806 80.65%
21 Samudrapur Lasanpur 0.806 80.56%
22 Seloo Helodi 0.803 80.29%
23 Samudrapur Waigaon (Gond) 0.803 80.27%
24 Samudrapur Ubda 0.802 80.18%
25 Arvi Umari(Sukali) 0.802 80.16%
26 Arvi Kawadi 0.802 80.15%
27 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 0.800 79.95%
28 Ashti Pandhurna 0.799 79.85%
29 Karanja Sawal 0.798 79.84%
30 Ashti Pilapur 0.798 79.82%
31 Devoli Bopapur 0.795 79.46%
32 Karanja Bondar Thana 0.793 79.29%
Wardha Development Report
34
S.No. Block GPLivelihood
Index% of working
population
33 Wardha Lonsawali 0.789 78.93%
34 Devoli Sendari 0.789 78.89%
35 Hinganghat Jamani 0.788 78.80%
36 Arvi Belhara 0.787 78.00%
37 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.787 78.70%
38 Seloo Sukali(Station) 0.787 78.68%
39 Seloo Zadshi 0.786 78.59%
40 Samudrapur Dhondgaon 0.786 78.56%
41 Karanja Ekarjun 0.784 78.40%
42 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.784 78.40%
43 Arvi Sawangi 0.784 78.39%
44 Hinganghat Dhamangaon 0.784 78.37%
45 Hinganghat Donduda 0.783 78.32%
46 Samudrapur Nandori 0.783 78.29%
47 Devoli Fattepur 0.779 77.94%
48 Hinganghat Satefal 0.779 77.91%
49 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.779 77.90%
50 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 0.779 77.86%
51 Hinganghat Pohana 0.776 76.70%
52 Karanja Kajali 0.774 77.40%
53 Karanja Dhawasa 0.774 77.37%
54 Seloo Wadgaon(Jangli) 0.773 77.32%
55 Seloo Juwadi 0.773 77.29%
56 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 0.772 77.22%
57 Arvi Salfal 0.772 77.21%
58 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.771 77.10%
59 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.771 77.05%
60 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.770 76.98%
61 Hinganghat Yerla 0.769 76.94%
62 Hinganghat Shekapur(Mo) 0.769 76.90%
63 Hinganghat Veni 0.767 76.70%
64 Hinganghat Wani 0.766 76.60%
65 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.766 76.60%
66 Seloo Dindoda 0.766 76.59%
35
Agriculture, irrigation and livelihood
S.No. Block GP LivelihoodIndex
% of workingpopulation
67 Seloo Waghala 0.765 76.51%
68 Devoli Babulgaon 0.765 76.50%
69 Hinganghat Warud 0.765 76.49%
70 Hinganghat Sawli Wagh 0.764 76.40%
71 Hinganghat Umari 0.764 76.40%
72 Seloo Kopara 0.764 76.38%
73 Devoli Chinchala 0.763 76.32%
74 Devoli Agargaon 0.763 76.31%
75 Seloo Jaypur 0.763 76.29%
76 Karanja Sawli Kh 0.761 76.09%
77 Wardha Ganeshpur 0.759 75.94%
78 Arvi Dahegaon Mustafa 0.759 75.91%
79 Ashti Thar 0.759 75.88%
80 Devoli Talni (Khanderao) 0.759 75.88%
81 Hinganghat Jangona 0.758 75.80%
82 Karanja Umari 0.758 75.77%
83 Wardha Tigaon 0.756 75.60%
84 Hinganghat Fukata 0.756 75.60%
85 Hinganghat Kajalsara 0.756 75.60%
86 Devoli Borgaon Aloda 0.755 75.48%
87 Arvi Bodad 0.754 75.38%
88 Devoli Loni 0.754 75.36%
89 Devoli Hiwra Kaware 0.753 75.33%
90 Karanja Selgaon Lawane 0.752 75.22%
91 Karanja Bihadi 0.750 75.00%
92 Hinganghat Yenora 0.749 74.86%
93 Hinganghat Gadegaon 0.747 74.70%
94 Ashti Bhishnur 0.747 74.65%
95 Devoli Wabgaon 0.746 74.62%
96 Hinganghat Khangaon 0.746 74.62%
97 Karanja Pardi 0.745 74.53%
98 Hinganghat Rohankheda 0.745 74.50%
99 Hinganghat Kapshi 0.742 75.96%
100 Karanja Jasapur 0.742 74.20%
Wardha Development Report
36
S.No. Block GP LivelihoodIndex
% of workingpopulation
101 Wardha Dahegaon Miskin 0.742 74.20%
102 Karanja Kinhala 0.741 74.15%
103 Samudrapur Nirgudi 0.740 74.02%
104 Arvi Dahegaon (Gondi) 0.740 74.01%
105 Ashti Bambarda 0.738 73.82%
106 Arvi Borgaon 0.738 73.80%
107 Devoli Kajalsara 0.737 73.69%
108 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 0.734 73.37%
109 Devoli Pimpalgaon 0.732 73.25%
110 Ashti Drugwada 0.732 73.24%
111 Wardha Dhamangaon 0.731 73.14%
112 Devoli Nagzari 0.731 73.05%
113 Ashti Wadala 0.730 72.96%
114 Wardha Talegaon(Ta) 0.728 72.75%
115 Seloo Wadgaon Khurd 0.727 72.71%
116 Arvi Morangana 0.727 72.68%
117 Hinganghat Allipur 0.725 72.45%
118 Wardha Wadadh 0.724 72.42%
119 Arvi Malegaon Theka 0.722 72.20%
120 Wardha Kelapur 0.718 71.77%
121 Ashti Ranwadi 0.717 71.72%
122 Hinganghat Wadner 0.717 71.70%
123 Arvi Parsodi(Tembhari) 0.717 71.70%
124 Wardha Paloti 0.716 71.57%
125 Arvi Bedhona 0.713 71.31%
126 Ashti Tarasawanga 0.712 71.24%
127 Wardha Nimgaon 0.712 71.23%
128 Ashti Sahur 0.712 71.19%
129 Wardha Selukate 0.708 70.76%
130 Devoli Vijaygopal 0.705 70.45%
131 Seloo Saldoh 0.702 70.25%
132 Arvi Sorta 0.701 70.13%
133 Karanja Kundi 0.701 70.07%
134 Devoli Palasgaon 0.700 70.02%
37
Agriculture, irrigation and livelihood
S.No. Block GPLivelihood
Index
% of workingpopulation
135 Hinganghat Wela 0.700 70.01%
136 Wardha Peth 0.697 69.66%
137 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 0.693 69.34%
138 Wardha Bhivapur 0.693 69.27%
139 Devoli Yesgaon 0.689 68.93%
140 Wardha Inzapur 0.686 68.58%
141 Wardha Dhotra(Ste) 0.683 68.31%
142 Wardha Bodad 0.682 68.23%
143 Arvi Deurwada 0.680 67.99%
144 Arvi Rohana 0.678 67.83%
145 Ashti Parsoda 0.671 67.06%
146 Ashti Lahan Arvi 0.649 64.89%
147 Samudrapur Khandala 0.648 64.84%
148 Wardha ANJI(Moti) 0.644 64.40%
149 Wardha Satoda 0.624 62.42%
150 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 0.610 60.98%
151 Arvi Bhadod 0.573 82.53%
152 Ashti Navin Ashti 0.496 49.62%
Wardha Development Report
38
4.
Education
and Healthy
living
Health and education are always issues.
The present chapter provides the findings related to
Education and Healthy living index.
The first step is organization of all Grampanchayat on
the basis of descending index (Grampanchayat with
highest index at the top and with least index in the
bottom). Then the four quartiles (Categories) of villages
are formed by using standard statistical method. The
details of each category are as follows:
1 Quartile 1 Top 38
Grampanchayats
2 Quartile 2 Middle 38
Grampanchayats
3 Quartile 3 Lower Middle 38
Grampanchayats
4 Quartile 4 Lowest
38Grampanchayats
The above classification will provide a clear guideline to
the district administrators regarding the Grampanchayat
where they need to intervene.
The two indicators used to find the Education index are
Mean Years of Schooling (MYS) and School Life
Expectancy (SLE). They are the standard indicators
used by UNDPin finding Human Development Index.
It is the average
number of completed years of education of a region's
population aged 25 years and older. For each level of
education, the proportion that attained that level of
education is multiplied by the official duration of that
level. The sum of the resulting values yields the MYS
for the population under investigation.
The official years of duration are as follows:
Very
High
High
Medium
Poor
Mean Years of Schooling (MYS):
1. How the Grampanchayats are categorised on
the basis of Education and Healthy living index?
Category
Number name
2. Which indicators are used to find Education
index?
Quartile Details Category
Educational Level Official years
of duration
Never attended school 0
Attended school but not 2.5
Passed 5th 5
Passed 8th 8
Passed 10th 10
Passed 12th 12
Passed Diploma 14
Graduate 15
Post Graduate 17
Number of years a
person of school entrance age can expect to spend within
the specified level of education. For a child of a certain
age a, the school life expectancy is calculated as the sum
of the age specific enrolment rates for the levels of
education specified. The part of the enrolment that is not
distributed by age is divided by the school-age
population for the level of education they are enrolled in,
and multiplied by the duration of that level of education.
The result is then added to the sum of the age-specific
enrolment rates. A relatively high SLE indicates greater
probability for children to spend more years in
education and higher overall retention within the
education system. It must be noted that the expected
number of years does not necessarily coincide with the
expected number of grades of education completed,
because of repetition. Since school life expectancy is an
average based on participation in different levels of
education, the expected number of years of schooling
may be pulled down by the magnitude of children who
never go to school. Those children who are in school
may benefit from many more years of education than the
average.
The Education index is found out by using following
formula:
Education Index=(MYS*2/3)+(SLE*1/3)
Grampanchayats with their Education index are given in
Annexure 4.1 at the end of this chapter.
passed 5th standard
School Life Expectancy (SLE):
Wardha Development Report
40
3. Which Grampanchayat is highest in terms of
Education index and which is lowest?
2 Which Gramapanchayat has maximum MYS
and SLE and which has least?
5. How many out of school children are there is
surveyed Grampanchayats?
6. Which are the top 10 Grampanchayats in
Education index?
SN Block Grampanchayat Educationindex
The Grampanchayat with highest Education index is Navin
Ashti inAshti Block (Education Index: 0.692) and lowest is
Akoli in Seloo block (Education Index: 0.501).The
interestingthingisNavinAshti inAshtihasleastAgriculture
and irrigation index. Navin Ashti has MYS of 9.5 while
Akoli has MYS as 4.67 years. While both have SLE near to
12. Thus MYS seems to be main contributing factor in
education index. This implies the education of adults is
contributingmoreineducationindex.
Maximum MYS: NavinAshti in Devoli (9.5 years)
Minimum MYS: Saldara inArvi (4.45Years)
Maximum SLE: 103 Gramapanchayats have SLE 12
years (Indicating all children in school)
Minimum SLE: Borgaon (Dhole) in Karanja (SLE:
11.19 years)
There are 116 children (6-18 Years) who are out of school
as against total 39713 children. Thus only 0.29 % children
are out of school. Maximum out of school children (25,
0.3 %) are in Grampanchayats ofWardhaBlock.
The top 10 Grampanchayats in terms of Education index
are as follows:
1 Ashti Navin ashti 0.692
2 Ashti Lahan arvi 0.627
3 Wardha Satoda 0.627
4 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 0.625
5 Devoli Palasgaon 0.622
6 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.614
7 Karanja Kundi 0.613
8 Wardha ANJI(Moti) 0.611
9 Arvi Sorta 0.611
10 Arvi Deurwada 0.609
See Pge No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
7. Which are the lowest 10 Grampanchayats in
Education index?
SN Block Gramapanchayat Education index
8. Which are the middle 10 Grampanchayats in
Education index?
SN Block Grampanchayat Education index
9. How many Grampanchayats in different block
are in very high, high, middle and poor category
in terms of Education index?
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
The lowest 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Ashti Pilapur 0.528
2 Ashti Bhishnur 0.528
3 Ashti Bambarda 0.528
4 Samudrapur Sewa 0.527
5 Ashti Pandhurna 0.524
6 Samudrapur Nirgudi 0.522
7 Arvi Sawangi 0.520
8 Arvi Saldara 0.508
9 Arvi DahegaonMustafa 0.507
10 Seloo Akoli 0.501
The middle 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Devoli Bopapur 0.577
2 Arvi Morangana 0.577
3 Hinganghat Jangona 0.576
4 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 0.576
5 Seloo Helodi 0.576
6 Devoli Chinchala 0.576
7 Karanja Dhawasa 0.576
8 Arvi Dahegaon (Gondi) 0.576
9 Karanja Umari 0.576
10 Wardha Nimgaon 0.576
Figure 4.1 provides the picture of block wise status of
Grampanchayat.
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
41
Education and Healthy living
5 4 6 84
1
104
2
99
6
34
14
1
2
8
3
87
56
6
4
3
54
5
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very high High Medium Low
Figure 4.1 : Number of Grampanchayats in each category of Education index, block wise
Wa r d h a b l o c k h a s m a x i m u m n u m b e r o f
Grampanchayats with very high Education index and
Samudrapur block have no Grampanchayats with very
high index. It is to be remembered that on the basis of
this number, the implications about overall situation of
Education of the block cannot be drawn as this analysis
is based on sampled Grampanchayat and not all
Grampanchayats in each block.
The data about SLE indicates that the number of out
of school children is one or two in all
Grampanchayats. There are 103 (68%)
Grampanchayats out of 152 Grampanchayats with
all children in school.
Following are the concerns emerging from Education
index:
All blocks have few Grampanchayats with low
Education index.
The MYS, which indicates number of years spent
in schools by the persons of age 25 years and above,
10. What are the encouraging factors as seen from
Education index?
11. What are the concerns emerging from
Education index?
�
�
�
is maximum of 9.5 years in Navin Ashti in Ashti
block, which is also less as compared to ideal value
of 17 years. This creates scope for adult education
in all Grampanchayats.
There are 9 Grampanchayats with MYS less than 5
years (Annexure 4.1).
Health is a significant aspect of human life and without
any health indicator the overall development of village
would be inadequate or misleading. Instead of health,
the term healthy living is used as the indicator used for
finding this index is the percentage of population (above
6 years of age) with no addiction. The data about
addiction to tobacco, khara, cigarette and alcohol was
collected and used to find proportion of population not
addicted to any of these addiction.
It is to be noted that this indicator provides limited
information about health of the population. As
Grampanchayat is a small unit, the number of
pregnant/delivered women or the number of children of
less than one year of age is in single digit. Hence
common mother and child health indicators such as
proportion of fullANCs, institutional deliveries, low birth
weight children etc cannot be used. Data was collected
�
12. Which indicators are used to find Healthy living
index?
Wardha Development Report
42
The lowest 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Hinganghat Umari 0.718
2 Seloo Akoli 0.716
3 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 0.715
4 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.710
5 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.703
6 Wardha Lonsawali 0.696
7 Samudrapur Sewa 0.695
8 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 0.694
9 Devoli Yesgaon 0.694
10 Hinganghat Satefal 0.684
The middle 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.785
2 Karanja Kundi 0.784
3 Karanja Sawli kh 0.783
4 Hinganghat Dhamangaon 0.783
5 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 0.783
6 Devoli Pimpalgaon 0.783
7 Wardha Dhamangaon 0.782
8 Wardha ANJI(Moti) 0.782
9 Karanja Sawal 0.782
10 Arvi Belhara 0.781
Figure 4.2 provides the picture of block wise status of
Grampanchayat.
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
SN Block Gramapanchayat Healthyliving
index
16. Which are the middle 10 Grampanchayats in
Healthy living index?
SN Block Gramapanchayat Healthyliving
index
17. How many Grampanchayats in different block
are in very high, high, middle and poor category
in terms of Healthy living index?
about number of immunized children. However it is
observed that almost 100 % children in the age group 1-2
years are immunized and hence that indicator could not be
considered. The data about birth registration was also
collected for the children in age group 0-6 years. However
discrepancies were found in the data and hence that data
was notusedfor anyhealth indicator.
The Grampanchayats with their Health index are given
inAnnexure 4.2 at the end of this chapter.
The Gramapanchayat with highest healthy living index
is Karda in Samudrapur Block (Healthy living index:
0.971) and lowest is Satefal in Hinganghatblock
(Healthy living Index: 0.684).
The top 10 Grampanchayats in terms of Healthy living
index are as follows:
1 Samudrapur Karda 0.971
2 Ashti Pilapur 0.922
3 Ashti NavinAshti 0.917
4 Ashti LahanArvi 0.889
5 Karanja Jasapur 0.883
6 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.879
7 Ashti Bhishnur 0.874
8 Karanja Bihadi 0.861
9 Ashti Ranwadi 0.853
10 Arvi Deurwada 0.849
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
13. Which Grampanchayat is highest in terms of
Healthy living and which is lowest?
14. Which are the top 10 Grampanchayats in
Healthy living index?
SN Block Gramapanchayat Healthy living
index
15. Which are the lowest 10 Grampanchayats in
Healthy livingindex?
43
Education and Healthy living
Figure 4.2 : Number of Grampanchayats in each category of Healthy living index, block wise
712
1 1
103 3 1
51
7 9
4
25
5
4
3
74
3
89
310
11
7
16
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very High High Medium Low
Thus Ashti block has maximum number of
Grampanchayats with very high Healthy living and
Hinganaghat, Devoliand Wardha blocks have one or two
Grampanchayat respectively with very high index. It is
to be remembered that on the basis of this number, the
implications about overall addiction scenario of the
block cannot be drawn as this analysis is based on
sampled Grampanchayat and not all Grampanchayats in
each block.
The status of mother and child health in all surveyed
Grampanchayat was found to be very good as can be
seen from the data (Table 4.1)
18. What is the status of mother and child health in
all Grampanchayats?
Table 4.1: Mother and child indicators of all 152 Grampanchayats
SN Indicator Number Total Percentage
1. Registered pregnant women 1174 1303 90.09 %
2. Consumption of iron tablet 1259 1303 88.94 %
3. Institutional Deliveries 2284 2303 99.17 %
4. Safe deliveries 2288 2303 99.35 %
5. Low Birth Weight Children 842 2303 36.56 %
6. Malnourished children 309 11827 2.61 %
7. Malnourished children getting supplementary food 171 309 55.34 %
Thus the mother and child health scenario of surveyed
Grampanchayats appear to be very good. The only
indicator of concern is the proportion of low birth
weight children, which is 36.56 %. The nutritional status
of mother during pregnancy require intensive
monitoring.
19. What are the encouraging factors as seen from
Healthy living index?
�
�
All the blocks have Grampanchayats in the
category of very high index
48 out of 152 Grampanchayats have more than 80
% of population which is not addicted to any of the
Wardha Development Report
44
addiction and 147 Grampanchayats have more than
70 % of population for the same. If maximum
values of all indicators are considered, the index of
healthy living is highest among them.
Almost 100 % children are immunized.
Almost all are institutional deliveries.
Following are the concerns emerging from Healthy
living index:
Devoli and Hinganghat blocks have more number
of Grampanchayats in poor Healthy living index
c a t e g o r y. M o r e p o p u l a t i o n i n t h e s e
Grampanchayats is addicted to one or the other
form of substance.
�
�
2 What are the concerns emerging from Healthy
living index?
�
�
�
�
�
There are five Grampanchayats in which more than
30 % of the population is addicted to some
substance (Annexure 4.2).
Around 3 % population (66409 persons) in the
surveyed Grampanchayats was found to consume
liquor, which might be under reported figure.
The correlation coefficient between education
index and healthy living is 0.24. Thus it is positive
but weak. This implies the weak relationship
among level of education and percentage of non-
addicted people. Thus addiction is evident among
all population.
Percentage of Low Birth Weight children is more in
the surveyed Grampanchayat.
45
Education and Healthy living
Annexure 4.1: Grampanchayat with Education index
Sn Block Grampanchayat Education Index MYS SLE
1 Ashti Navin Ashti 0.692 9.5 12.00
2 Ashti Lahan Arvi 0.627 7.52 11.96
3 Wardha Satoda 0.627 7.50 11.98
4 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 0.625 7.55 11.84
5 Devoli Palasgaon 0.622 7.36 12.00
6 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.614 7.15 12.00
7 Karanja Kundi 0.613 7.14 12.00
8 Wardha Anji(Moti) 0.611 7.11 11.97
9 Arvi Sorta 0.611 7.08 12.00
10 Arvi Deurwada 0.609 7.09 11.91
11 Arvi Rohana 0.606 7.00 11.95
12 Hinganghat Rohankheda 0.604 6.90 12.00
13 Karanja Kinhala 0.604 6.89 12.00
14 Hinganghat Yenora 0.602 6.84 12.00
15 Hinganghat Wadner 0.601 6.84 11.99
16 Hinganghat Wela 0.601 6.83 12.00
17 Wardha Peth 0.601 6.82 12.00
18 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 0.601 6.83 11.98
19 Wardha Bodad 0.599 6.77 12.00
20 Ashti Parsoda 0.598 6.74 12.00
21 Hinganghat Allipur 0.597 6.77 11.95
22 Karanja Sawli Kh 0.596 6.70 12.00
23 Wardha Paloti 0.596 6.70 12.00
24 Devoli Agargaon 0.596 6.77 11.90
25 Seloo Wadgaon(Jangli) 0.595 6.68 12.00
26 Devoli Pimpalgaon 0.595 6.77 11.85
27 Hinganghat Khangaon 0.594 6.64 12.00
28 Wardha Talegaon(Ta) 0.593 6.67 11.94
29 Devoli Nagzari 0.593 6.62 12.00
30 Ashti Sahur 0.593 6.64 11.96
31 Arvi Panjara Bothali 0.593 6.68 11.90
Wardha Development Report
46
Sn Block Grampanchayat Education Index MYS SLE
32 Devoli Wabgaon 0.592 6.60 12.00
33 Devoli Fattepur 0.591 6.57 12.00
34 Hinganghat Pohana 0.591 6.57 12.00
35 Hinganghat Satefal 0.590 6.55 12.00
36 Wardha Bhivapur 0.589 6.53 12.00
37 Arvi Bodad 0.589 6.53 12.00
38 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 0.589 6.56 11.95
39 Karanja Pardi 0.589 6.57 11.92
40 Karanja Jasapur 0.587 6.47 12.00
41 Karanja Kajali 0.587 6.47 12.00
42 Devoli Yesgaon 0.587 6.47 12.00
43 Karanja Bihadi 0.587 6.47 12.00
44 Seloo Wadgaon Khurd 0.587 6.51 11.94
45 Ashti Ranwadi 0.587 6.46 12.00
46 Devoli Borgaon Aloda 0.587 6.46 12.00
47 Hinganghat Kajalsara 0.586 6.45 12.00
48 Hinganghat Sawli Wagh 0.586 6.49 11.94
49 Arvi Malegaon Theka 0.586 6.44 12.00
50 Seloo Waghala 0.585 6.42 12.00
51 Wardha Kelapur 0.584 6.40 12.00
52 Karanja Parsodi 0.584 6.40 12.00
53 Hinganghat Wani 0.583 6.47 11.87
54 Devoli Sendari 0.583 6.36 12.00
55 Karanja Selgaon Lawane 0.582 6.35 12.00
56 Hinganghat Kapshi 0.582 6.35 12.00
57 Arvi Borgaon 0.582 6.34 12.00
58 Samudrapur Nandori 0.581 6.32 12.00
59 Devoli Kajalsara 0.581 6.32 12.00
60 Hinganghat Shekapur(Mo) 0.581 6.32 12.00
61 Hinganghat Fukata 0.581 6.34 11.95
62 Hinganghat Veni 0.580 6.29 12.00
63 Samudrapur Wadgaon 0.580 6.28 12.00
47
Education and Healthy living
Sn Block Grampanchayat Education Index MYS SLE
64 Devoli Amboda 0.580 6.28 12.00
65 Hinganghat Yerla 0.579 6.31 11.95
66 Samudrapur Khandala 0.579 6.34 11.90
67 Seloo Zadshi 0.579 6.26 12.00
68 Ashti Tarasawanga 0.579 6.26 12.00
69 Devoli Chikhali 0.578 6.28 11.96
70 Arvi Parsodi(Tembhari) 0.578 6.25 12.00
71 Devoli Vijaygopal 0.578 6.23 12.00
72 Devoli Bopapur 0.577 6.22 12.00
73 Arvi Morangana 0.577 6.22 12.00
74 Hinganghat Jangona 0.576 6.25 11.93
75 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 0.576 6.20 12.00
76 Seloo Helodi 0.576 6.20 12.00
77 Devoli Chinchala 0.576 6.20 12.00
78 Karanja Dhawasa 0.576 6.20 12.00
79 Arvi Dahegaon (Gondi) 0.576 6.20 12.00
80 Karanja Umari 0.576 6.23 11.95
81 Wardha Nimgaon 0.576 6.19 12.00
82 Seloo Saldoh 0.576 6.21 11.97
83 Seloo Kopara 0.576 6.27 11.88
84 Karanja Ekarjun 0.576 6.18 12.00
85 Samudrapur Karda 0.576 6.18 12.00
86 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.575 6.16 12.00
87 Samudrapur Lasanpur 0.575 6.18 11.97
88 Wardha Inzapur 0.574 6.14 12.00
89 Seloo Sukali(Station) 0.574 6.13 12.00
90 Hinganghat Gadegaon 0.574 6.13 12.00
91 Wardha Selukate 0.573 6.12 12.00
92 Arvi Belhara 0.573 6.10 12.00
93 Arvi Bhadod 0.573 6.10 12.00
94 Seloo Jaypur 0.573 6.10 12.00
95 Hinganghat Jamani 0.572 6.09 12.00
Wardha Development Report
48
Sn Block Grampanchayat Education Index MYS SLE
96 Samudrapur Washi 0.572 6.08 12.00
97 Ashti Drugwada 0.571 6.1 11.94
98 Samudrapur Waigaon (Gond) 0.571 6.07 12.00
99 Samudrapur Ubda 0.571 6.11 11.93
100 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 0.571 6.05 12.00
101 Wardha Dahegaon Miskin 0.570 6.03 12.00
102 Wardha Wadadh 0.570 6.03 12.00
103 Samudrapur Tas 0.569 6.01 12.00
104 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.568 5.99 12.00
105 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 0.568 5.98 12.00
106 Seloo Juwadi 0.567 5.95 12.00
107 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.566 5.96 11.96
108 Devoli Loni 0.565 5.94 11.97
109 Hinganghat Warud 0.565 6.07 11.78
110 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.564 5.93 11.95
111 Seloo Salai(Kala) 0.564 5.88 12.00
112 Seloo Dindoda 0.561 5.81 12.00
113 Hinganghat Donduda 0.561 5.80 12.00
114 Arvi Salfal 0.560 5.78 12.00
115 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.559 5.76 12.00
116 Wardha Dhamangaon 0.559 5.76 12.00
117 Seloo Takali(Kite) 0.559 5.75 12.00
118 Wardha Dhotra(Ste) 0.559 5.75 12.00
119 Karanja Kannamwar Gram 0.558 5.76 11.95
120 Wardha Tigaon 0.557 5.77 11.92
121 Karanja Bondar Thana 0.555 5.65 12.00
122 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.555 5.65 12.00
123 Arvi Bedhona 0.554 5.70 11.91
124 Samudrapur Dhondgaon 0.554 5.65 11.96
125 Karanja Sawal 0.553 5.60 12.00
126 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 0.553 6.17 11.19
127 Devoli Talni (Khanderao) 0.548 5.48 12.00
49
Education and Healthy living
Sn Block Grampanchayat Education Index MYS SLE
128 Arvi Umari(Sukali) 0.546 5.52 11.88
129 Ashti Wadala 0.545 5.39 12.00
130 Hinganghat Umari 0.545 5.39 12.00
131 Devoli Babulgaon 0.544 5.38 12.00
132 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.542 5.36 11.94
133 Wardha Lonsawali 0.542 5.34 11.96
134 Seloo Khadaki 0.540 5.27 12.00
135 Devoli Hiwra Kaware 0.539 5.24 12.00
136 Hinganghat Dhamangaon 0.538 5.27 11.94
137 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 0.537 5.20 12.00
138 Seloo Deulgaon 0.537 5.23 11.95
139 Ashti Thar 0.535 5.22 11.90
140 Arvi Kawadi 0.533 5.20 11.85
141 Wardha Ganeshpur 0.531 5.09 11.93
142 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.531 5.03 12.00
143 Ashti Pilapur 0.528 4.97 12.00
144 Ashti Bhishnur 0.528 6.22 12.00
145 Ashti Bambarda 0.528 4.95 12.00
146 Samudrapur Sewa 0.527 4.95 12.00
147 Ashti Pandhurna 0.524 4.86 12.00
148 Samudrapur Nirgudi 0.522 4.82 12.00
149 Arvi Sawangi 0.520 4.77 12.00
150 Arvi Saldara 0.508 4.45 12.00
151 Arvi Dahegaon Mustafa 0.507 4.46 11.96
152 Seloo Akoli 0.501 4.67 11.46
Wardha Development Report
50
Annexure 4.2: Grampanchayats with Healthy living Index
SN Block Grampanchayat Healthy Living % of
Non-addictedIndex
1 Samudrapur Karda 0.971 97.1%
2 Ashti Pilapur 0.922 92.2%
3 Ashti Navin Ashti 0.917 91.7%
4 Ashti Lahan Arvi 0.889 88.9%
5 Karanja Jasapur 0.883 88.3%
6 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.879 87.9%
7 Ashti Bhishnur 0.874 87.4%
8 Karanja Bihadi 0.861 86.1%
9 Ashti Ranwadi 0.853 85.3%
10 Arvi Deurwada 0.849 84.9%
11 Ashti Parsoda 0.849 84.9%
12 Devoli Amboda 0.836 83.6%
13 Samudrapur Nirgudi 0.834 83.4%
14 Wardha Bodad 0.833 83.3%
15 Samudrapur Khandala 0.832 83.2%
16 Karanja Umari 0.828 82.8%
17 Karanja Ekarjun 0.828 82.8%
18 Arvi Rohana 0.827 82.7%
19 Arvi Borgaon 0.826 82.6%
20 Ashti Tarasawanga 0.823 82.3%
21 Ashti Sahur 0.822 82.2%
22 Karanja Kannamwar Gram 0.819 81.9%
23 Seloo Juwadi 0.817 81.7%
24 Karanja Bondar Thana 0.817 81.7%
25 Ashti Wadala 0.814 81.4%
26 Arvi Sorta 0.814 81.4%
27 Arvi Parsodi(Tembhari) 0.812 81.2%
28 Hinganghat Pohana 0.811 81.1%
29 Ashti Drugwada 0.811 81.1%
30 Karanja Kajali 0.810 81.0%
31 Ashti Thar 0.810 81.0%
32 Ashti Bambarda 0.809 80.9%
51
Education and Healthy living
SN Block Grampanchayat Healthy Living % of
Index Non-addicted
33 Arvi Dahegaon (Gondi) 0.809 80.9%
34 Seloo Wadgaon Khurd 0.808 80.8%
35 Karanja Pardi 0.808 80.8%
36 Arvi Morangana 0.807 80.7%
37 Seloo Salai(Kala) 0.807 80.7%
38 Karanja Parsodi 0.806 80.6%
39 Samudrapur Lasanpur 0.806 80.6%
40 Devoli Agargaon 0.805 80.5%
41 Devoli Wabgaon 0.804 80.4%
42 Hinganghat Jangona 0.803 80.3%
43 Wardha Kelapur 0.802 80.2%
44 Arvi Bedhona 0.802 80.2%
45 Hinganghat Kapshi 0.801 80.1%
46 Seloo Takali(Kite) 0.801 80.1%
47 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 0.801 80.1%
48 Devoli Fattepur 0.800 80.0%
49 Hinganghat Allipur 0.799 79.9%
50 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.799 79.9%
51 Seloo Sukali(Station) 0.798 79.8%
52 Seloo Wadgaon(Jangli) 0.798 79.8%
53 Karanja Kinhala 0.798 79.8%
54 Wardha Nimgaon 0.797 79.7%
55 Arvi Panjara Bothali 0.797 79.7%
56 Karanja Dhawasa 0.796 79.6%
57 Devoli Palasgaon 0.796 79.6%
58 Ashti Pandhurna 0.796 79.6%
59 Devoli Vijaygopal 0.796 79.6%
60 Arvi Dahegaon Mustafa 0.794 79.4%
61 Devoli Babulgaon 0.793 79.3%
62 Wardha Satoda 0.793 79.3%
63 Hinganghat Warud 0.791 79.1%
64 Arvi Salfal 0.791 79.1%
65 Samudrapur Waigaon (Gond) 0.791 79.1%
Wardha Development Report
52
SN Block Grampanchayat Healthy Living % of
Index Non-addicted
66 Hinganghat Veni 0.791 79.1%
67 Arvi Saldara 0.790 79.0%
68 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 0.789 78.9%
69 Hinganghat Fukata 0.788 78.8%
70 Seloo Saldoh 0.787 78.7%
71 Hinganghat Wadner 0.785 78.5%
72 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.785 78.5%
73 Karanja Kundi 0.784 78.4%
74 Karanja Sawli Kh 0.783 78.3%
75 Hinganghat Dhamangaon 0.783 78.3%
76 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 0.783 78.3%
77 Devoli Pimpalgaon 0.783 78.3%
78 Wardha Dhamangaon 0.782 78.2%
79 Wardha Anji(Moti) 0.782 78.2%
80 Karanja Sawal 0.782 78.2%
81 Arvi Belhara 0.781 78.0%
82 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 0.780 78.0%
83 Arvi Bodad 0.779 77.9%
84 Arvi Malegaon Theka 0.779 77.9%
85 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 0.777 77.7%
86 Hinganghat Wela 0.777 77.7%
87 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.775 77.5%
88 Devoli Sendari 0.774 77.4%
89 Seloo Zadshi 0.774 77.4%
90 Seloo Helodi 0.774 77.4%
91 Samudrapur Ubda 0.773 77.3%
92 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.773 77.3%
93 Wardha Dhotra(Ste) 0.772 77.2%
94 Seloo Dindoda 0.772 77.2%
95 Wardha Peth 0.771 77.1%
96 Seloo Deulgaon 0.768 76.8%
97 Arvi Sawangi 0.766 76.6%
98 Seloo Khadaki 0.766 76.6%
53
Education and Healthy living
SN Block Grampanchayat Healthy Living % of
Index Non-addicted
99 Hinganghat Shekapur(Mo) 0.765 76.5%
100 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.763 76.3%
101 Wardha Selukate 0.763 76.3%
102 Seloo Jaypur 0.763 76.3%
103 Hinganghat Gadegaon 0.762 76.2%
104 Seloo Waghala 0.762 76.2%
105 Hinganghat Jamani 0.761 76.1%
106 Devoli Borgaon Aloda 0.761 76.1%
107 Wardha Dahegaon Miskin 0.760 76.0%
108 Karanja Selgaon Lawane 0.759 75.9%
109 Wardha Talegaon(Ta) 0.758 75.8%
110 Samudrapur Washi 0.755 75.5%
111 Wardha Tigaon 0.754 75.4%
112 Wardha Paloti 0.754 75.4%
113 Hinganghat Sawli Wagh 0.753 75.3%
114 Seloo Kopara 0.753 75.3%
115 Hinganghat Yerla 0.748 74.8%
117 Arvi Bhadod 0.748 74.5%
116 Devoli Bopapur 0.748 74.8%
118 Hinganghat Khangaon 0.747 74.7%
119 Devoli Kajalsara 0.747 74.7%
120 Wardha Bhivapur 0.745 74.5%
121 Hinganghat Donduda 0.742 74.2%
122 Samudrapur Nandori 0.741 74.1%
123 Hinganghat Rohankheda 0.741 74.1%
124 Samudrapur Dhondgaon 0.740 74.0%
125 Hinganghat Kajalsara 0.739 73.9%
126 Arvi Umari(Sukali) 0.739 73.9%
127 Samudrapur Tas 0.738 73.8%
128 Devoli Chinchala 0.736 73.6%
129 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.734 73.4%
130 Wardha Wadadh 0.732 73.2%
131 Devoli Nagzari 0.730 73.0%
Wardha Development Report
54
SN Block Grampanchayat Healthy Living % of
Index Non-addicted
132 Hinganghat Yenora 0.729 72.9%
133 Wardha Ganeshpur 0.728 72.8%
134 Wardha Inzapur 0.728 72.8%
135 Devoli Loni 0.727 72.7%
136 Arvi Kawadi 0.726 72.6%
137 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 0.723 72.3%
138 Hinganghat Wani 0.723 72.3%
139 Devoli Talni (Khanderao) 0.719 71.9%
140 Devoli Chikhali 0.719 71.2%
141 Samudrapur Wadgaon 0.719 71.9%
142 Devoli Hiwra Kaware 0.718 71.8%
143 Hinganghat Umari 0.718 71.8%
144 Seloo Akoli 0.716 71.6%
145 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 0.715 71.5%
146 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.710 71.0%
147 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.703 70.3%
148 Wardha Lonsawali 0.696 69.6%
149 Samudrapur Sewa 0.695 69.5%
150 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 0.694 69.4%
151 Devoli Yesgaon 0.694 69.4%
152 Hinganghat Satefal 0.684 68.4%
55
Education and Healthy living
5.
Financial
Inclusion and
Household
infrastructure
Participation in SHGs means a step towards women empowerment.
The present chapter provides the findings related to
Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure index.
The first step is organization of all Grampanchayats on
the basis of descending index (Grampanchayat with
highest index at the top and with least index in the
bottom). Then the four quartiles (Categories) of villages
are formed by using standard statistical method. The
details of each category are as follows:
1 Quartile 1 Top 38 Very High
2 Quartile 2 Middle 38
Grampanchayats
3 Quartile 3 Lower Middle 38
Grampanchayats
4 Quartile 4 Lowest 38
Grampanchayats
The above classification will provide a clear guideline to
the district administrators regarding the Grampanchayat
where they need to intervene.
The two indicators used to find the Financial Inclusion
index are percentage of households with at least one
female member as the member of Self Help Group
(SHG) and the percentage of persons (=>6 years of age)
with bank account.
Grampanchayats with their Financial Inclusion index
are given inAnnexure 5.1 at the end of this chapter.
The Grampanchayat with highest Financial Inclusion
index is Hiwara Kaware in Devoli Block (0.891) and
lowest is Selu Bai in Hinganaghat block (0.345).Hiwara
Kaware Grampanchayat have 97.48 % households with
at least one female as SHG member and around 80.72%
persons have bank account. However in Selu Bai only
Grampanchayats
High
Medium
Poor
1 How the Grampanchayats are categorised on
the basis of Financial Inclusion and Household
Infrastructure index?
Category Quartile Details Category
name
2. Which indicators are used to find Financial
Inclusion index?
3. Which Grampanchayat is highest in terms of
Financial Inclusion index and which is lowest?
Number
7.77 % households have SHG members and 61.17 %
persons have bank account.
The top 10 Grampanchayats in terms of Financial
Inclusion index are as follows:
1 Devoli Hiwra kaware 0.891
2 Devoli Kajalsara 0.803
3 Devoli Loni 0.803
4 Hinganghat Kajalsara 0.803
5 Devoli Fattepur 0.798
6 Seloo Takali(Kite) 0.783
7 Samudrapur Karda 0.782
8 Devoli Wabgaon 0.781
9 Devoli Bopapur 0.780
10 Wardha Kelapur 0.778
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
The lowest 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Hinganghat Kapshi 0.444
2 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.442
3 Hinganghat Warud 0.434
4 Ashti Pilapur 0.413
5 Hinganghat Allipur 0.413
6 Hinganghat Yerla 0.408
7 Hinganghat Jangona 0.392
8 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.391
9 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.391
10 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.345
4. Which are the top 10 Grampanchayats in
Financial Inclusion index?
SN Block Grampanchayat Financial
Inclusion index
5. Which are the lowest 10 Grampanchayats in
Financial Inclusion index?
SN Block Grampanchayat Financial
Inclusionindex
57
Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure
7. How many Grampanchayats in different block
are in very high, high, middle and poor category
in terms of Financial Inclusion index?
Figure 5.1 provides the picture of block wise status of
Grampanchayat.
Devo l i b lock have maximum number of
Grampanchayats with very high Financial Inclusion
index. Karnja and Ashti block have no Grampanchayat
with very high index of Financial Inclusion. Hinganghat
block have maximum Grampanchayats with low index.
It is to be remembered that on the basis of this number,
the implications about overall situation of SHG
participation or banking of the block cannot be drawn as
this analysis is based on sampled Grampanchayat and
not all Grampanchayats in each block.
6. Which are the middle 10 Grampanchayats in
Financial Inclusion index?
SN Block Gramapanchayat Financial
Inclusionindex
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
The middle 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Karanja Selgaon (umate) 0.620
2 Karanja Selgaon lawane 0.620
3 Seloo Sukali(station) 0.620
4 Karanja Parsodi 0.617
5 Samudrapur Sewa 0.616
6 Devoli Amboda 0.613
7 Ashti Parsoda 0.609
8 Wardha ANJI(moti) 0.608
9 Karanja Kundi 0.602
10 Hinganghat Umari 0.600
Figure 5.1: Number of Grampanchayats in each category of Financial Inclusion index, block wise
1
17
25 6 7
2 3
2
1 6
89 7
58
2
6
101
1 511
2
192
11
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very High High Medium Low
Wardha Development Report
58
8. Females in how many households are members of SHGs in surveyed villages?
Block
Number of females asSHG members
TotalHouseholdwith SHGmembers1 2 3 4
Arvi 1469 45 2 0 1516
Ashti 1677 43 3 0 1723
Devoli 5075 255 19 2 5351
Hinganghat 2974 67 2 0 3043
Karanja 1782 33 1 0 1816
Samudrapur 2731 178 10 1 2920
Seloo 430 87 4 0 2521
Wardha 5359 313 21 1 5694
Devoli and Wardha block have maximum households
with SHG members, while Arvi has least number of
households.
SHGs receive periodic training by DRDA or
MAVIM
They also receive funds through bank after
submission of proposals
The revolving funds are mainly utilized for non-
productive activities such as expenditure in
marriages, construction of homes, for admission of
children, buying seeds or for health reasons by
majority of the members
The incidences of occupations such as bangle
selling, grocery shops, fall pico machine, tailoring,
flour mills, preparing Patravali, milk production,
goat farming by SHGs are also observed.
The members are benefitted as they develop habit
of saving
Delay in obtaining honorarium of Cluster Resource
Persons was reported
Lack of knowledge about marketing strategies and
hence lack of initiative for starting any
9. What are the issues related to SHGs?
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
manufacturing units was observed among SHG
members during interviews
Certain SHGs limit their programme to collecting
deposits and giving loans. Such SHGs have to be
motivated to involve in group activities
Inadequacy of efficient and skilled coordinators
was also reported by SHG members
The income of members who are engaged in
agriculture is irregular and seasonal. They fail to
repay loan during off seasons and find it difficult to
attend the group meetings during agricultural
seasons
Around 80 % persons of 6 years and above age in
Wardha have bank accounts.
Around 43 % households in which at least one
female is member of SHGs.
Following are the concerns emerging from Financial
Inclusion index:
�
�
�
�
�
10. What are the encouraging factors as seen from
Financial Inclusionindex?
11. What are the concerns those are emerging from
Financial Inclusion index?
Table 5.1: Number of households with number of SHG members
# Figure indicate number of households
59
Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure
13. Which Grampanchayat is highest in terms of
Household Infrastructure index and which is
lowest?
14. Which are the top 10 Grampanchayats in
Household Infrastructure index?
The Grampanchayat with highest Household
Infrastructure index is Yesgaon in Devoli Block (index:
0.879) and lowest is Umari in Karnaja block (Index:
0.508). Yeasgaon Grampanchayat has almost all
indicators have value above 80 %. But in Umari two
indicatorshave value above 90 %.
The top 10 Grampanchayats in terms of Household
Infrastructure index are as follows:
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
SN Indicator Description
1. Percentage of households with Electricity -
2. Percentage of households with LPG The availability of LPG was considered rather than
its use.
3. Percentage of Owned households -
4. Percentage of households with availability of Water available from any source was considered
5. Percentage of households using individual The percentage of households having individual
toilets and using them was calculated against the
total number of households surveyed in that
Grampanchayat
6. Percentage of households with hygienic Hygienic drainage facility included the Waste water
outlet to: drainage, kitchen garden, farm and
shoshkhadda
7. Percentage of households with hygienic facility Hygienic facility of garbage disposal included:
waste bin, farm, wormy compost, ghanta gadi
8. Percentage of pacca house Pacca house was the house with all roof, floor and
wall material was cement or stone
drinking water for 12 months
drainage facility
of garbage disposal
SN Block Grampanchayat HouseholdInfra-
structureindex
1 Devoli Yesgaon 0.879
2 Devoli Palasgaon 0.864
3 Devoli Bopapur 0.845
4 Ashti NavinAshti 0.842
5 Wardha Bhivapur 0.842
6 Wardha Peth 0.838
7 Devoli Nachangaon 0.833
8 Wardha Bodad 0.826
9 Devoli Chinchala 0.823
10 Devoli Chikhali 0.821
�
12. Which indicators are used to find Household
Infrastructure index?
Financial Inclusion index is low in Gram-
panchayats ofAshti and Hiangnghat blocks.
Household infrastructure is one of the ways of assessing
standard of living of people. Following indicators were
used to find Household Infrastructure index (Table 5.2).
The Grampanchayats with their Household
Infrastructure are given in Annexure 5.2 at the end of
this chapter.
Table 5.2 : Household infrastructure index : Indicators and description
Wardha Development Report
60
15. Which are the lowest 10 Grampanchayats in
Household Infrastructure index?
SN Block Grampanchayat HouseholdInfra-
structureindex
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
The lowest 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Arvi Saldara 0.582
2 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 0.581
3 Seloo Akoli 0.581
4 Karanja Bondar Thana 0.578
5 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.573
6 Arvi Kawadi 0.571
7 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 0.567
8 Karanja Kannamwar gram 0.559
9 Karanja Dhawasa 0.539
10 Karanja Umari 0.508
2 4
14
1 1 1
15
33
6
52
8 6
5
8 4
1
12
2
55
1
6
2
10
14
1 5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Arvi Ashti Devoli Hinganghat Karanja Samudrapur Seloo Wardha
Very High High Medium Low
Figure 5.2: Number of Grampanchayats in each category of Healthy living index, block wise
16. Which are the middle 10 Grampanchayats in
Household Infrastructure index?
SN Block Grampanchayat Household Infra-
structureindex
See Page No. 6 & 7 for Methodology of Index
The middle 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
1 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 0.712
2 Hinganghat Wadner 0.712
3 Seloo Waghala 0.711
4 Hinganghat Veni 0.711
5 Seloo Sukali(Station) 0.711
6 Ashti Ranwadi 0.711
7 Hinganghat Yenora 0.710
8 Seloo Helodi 0.708
9 Samudrapur Dhondgaon 0.707
10 Samudrapur Karda 0.707
17. How many Grampanchayats in different block
are in very high, high, middle and poor category
in terms of Household Infrastructure index?
Figure 5.2 provides the picture of block wise status of
Grampanchayat.
Devoli and Wardha block have maximum number of
Grampanchayats with very high Household
Infrastructure index. Karanaja has no Grampanchayat
with very high Household Infrastructure index. It is to
be remembered that on the basis of this number, the
implications about overall Household Infrastructure
scenario of the block cannot be drawn as this analysis is
based on sampled Grampanchayat and not all
Grampanchayats in each block.
61
Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure
18. Is there any relation between financial inclusion
and household infrastructure?
19. What are the encouraging factors as seen from
Household Infrastructure index?
�
�
�
�
The correlation coefficient of financial inclusion and
household infrastructure index is 0.42 indicating
financial inclusion has positive effect on households
infrastructure.
133 Grampanchayats have electricity in more than
90 % of households.
34 Grampanchayats have LPG in more than 80 %
of households
135 Grampanchayats have more than 90 % of
households as own houses.
137 Grampanchayats have households with
drinking water facility available in more than 50%
of households
�
�
�
20. What are the concerns those are emerging from
Household Infrastructure living index?
43 Grampanchayats have more than 80 % of
households which use toilets
Following are the concerns emerging from Household
Infrastructure index:
The drainage and garbage disposal are continued to
be issues in villages. Only 7 Grampanchayats have
more than 90% households with hygienic drainage
facility. Only 6 Grampanchayats have more than
90% households with hygienic facility of garbage
disposal.
Maximum percentage of pacca houses is 78 % and
minimum is 20%. This indicates requirement to
improve housing conditions.
Wardha Development Report
62
Sr.No.
Block GPFinancialInclusion
Index
% of HHwith SHGmember
% ofbank
accounts
1 Devoli Hiwra Kaware 0.891 97.5% 80.7%
4 Devoli Kajalsara 0.803 57.1% 82.1%
3 Devoli Loni 0.803 72.9% 87.7%
2 Hinganghat Kajalsara 0.803 9.4% 81.4%
5 Devoli Fattepur 0.798 74.5% 85.0%
6 Seloo Takali(Kite) 0.783 69.9% 86.7%
7 Samudrapur Karda 0.782 67.9% 88.5%
8 Devoli Wabgaon 0.781 72.3% 83.9%
9 Devoli Bopapur 0.780 69.6% 86.4%
10 Wardha Kelapur 0.778 74.1% 81.4%
11 Devoli Yesgaon 0.772 68.5% 85.9%
12 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.767 74.3% 79.1%
13 Devoli Babulgaon 0.764 66.8% 86.0%
14 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.748 69.0% 80.6%
15 Samudrapur Wadgaon 0.748 64.8% 84.8%
16 Wardha Dahegaon Miskin 0.748 71.8% 77.8%
19 Devoli Pimpalgaon 0.745 68.6% 80.5%
18 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.745 44.0% 77.9%
17 Seloo Wadgaon(Jangli) 0.745 58.7% 90.4%
20 Devoli Borgaon Aloda 0.741 65.2% 83.1%
21 Devoli Palasgaon 0.740 62.9% 85.1%
22 Arvi Sorta 0.728 56.9% 88.8%
23 Seloo Waghala 0.725 57.9% 87.0%
24 Wardha Bhivapur 0.725 65.0% 79.9%
25 Devoli Chinchala 0.723 62.4% 82.2%
26 Devoli Vijaygopal 0.721 57.0% 87.1%
27 Samudrapur Tas 0.717 58.0% 85.3%
29 Wardha Dhotra(Ste) 0.717 63.5% 79.9%
28 Wardha Tigaon 0.717 60.1% 83.4%
Annexure 5.1: Grampanchayat with Financial Inclusion index
63
Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure
Sr.No.
Block GPFinancialInclusion
Index
% of HHwith SHGmember
% ofbank
accounts
31 Seloo Dindoda 0.712 61.1% 81.4%
30 Wardha Lonsawali 0.712 57.1% 85.3%
32 Devoli Talni (Khanderao) 0.711 59.6% 82.6%
33 Seloo Zadshi 0.708 50.7% 91.0%
34 Seloo Salai(Kala) 0.707 55.2% 86.3%
36 Devoli Nagzari 0.704 62.0% 78.9%
35 Samudrapur Nirgudi 0.704 65.8% 75.1%
37 Devoli Agargaon 0.703 62.3% 78.3%
38 Wardha Nimgaon 0.700 56.8% 83.2%
39 Devoli Chikhali 0.697 61.4% 78.0%
40 Samudrapur Lasanpur 0.691 65.7% 72.5%
41 Seloo Jaypur 0.686 52.3% 84.9%
42 Seloo Juwadi 0.684 56.7% 80.2%
43 Samudrapur Dhondgaon 0.683 58.5% 78.1%
45 Karanja Kinhala 0.682 50.0% 86.4%
44 Samudrapur Washi 0.682 51.7% 84.7%
46 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 0.679 59.8% 76.1%
47 Wardha Peth 0.671 47.3% 86.9%
48 Samudrapur Waigaon (Gond) 0.670 57.6% 76.3%
49 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 0.670 51.9% 82.1%
50 Arvi Parsodi(Tembhari) 0.666 46.8% 86.3%
51 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 0.662 54.7% 77.7%
52 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 0.660 55.6% 76.3%
53 Hinganghat Yenora 0.657 50.2% 81.3%
54 Seloo Wadgaon Khurd 0.656 57.8% 73.4%
55 Karanja Kajali 0.654 39.6% 91.1%
56 Wardha Ganeshpur 0.652 51.5% 78.8%
57 Seloo Helodi 0.651 46.6% 83.6%
58 Wardha Satoda 0.650 50.6% 79.5%
59 Ashti Pandhurna 0.648 50.9% 78.7%
60 Arvi Borgaon 0.647 48.0% 81.3%
Wardha Development Report
64
Sr.No.
Block GPFinancialInclusion
Index
% of HHwith SHGmember
% ofbank
accounts
61 Samudrapur Ubda 0.644 50.4% 78.4%
62 Seloo Saldoh 0.642 48.6% 79.9%
63 Ashti Ranwadi 0.636 48.9% 78.4%
64 Seloo Khadaki 0.635 50.8% 76.2%
65 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.634 43.1% 83.7%
66 Wardha Selukate 0.634 53.5% 73.3%
67 Ashti Thar 0.631 41.3% 85.0%
68 Wardha Paloti 0.631 47.7% 78.5%
69 Karanja Ekarjun 0.627 40.6% 84.8%
70 Samudrapur Nandori 0.625 53.0% 72.1%
71 Seloo Deulgaon 0.624 46.4% 78.3%
72 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 0.620 33.5% 90.5%
74 Karanja Selgaon Lawane 0.620 34.9% 89.1%
73 Seloo Sukali(Station) 0.620 40.5% 83.5%
75 Karanja Parsodi 0.617 34.5% 89.0%
76 Samudrapur Sewa 0.616 44.1% 79.1%
77 Devoli Amboda 0.613 58.3% 64.2%
78 Ashti Parsoda 0.609 44.9% 77.0%
79 Wardha Anji(Moti) 0.608 41.7% 80.0%
80 Karanja Kundi 0.602 32.9% 87.6%
81 Hinganghat Umari 0.600 44.4% 75.6%
82 Karanja Umari 0.600 21.0% 87.6%
83 Wardha Talegaon(Ta) 0.600 40.7% 79.4%
84 Karanja Sawli Kh 0.593 21.5% 85.6%
85 Hinganghat Shekapur(Mo) 0.591 41.3% 76.9%
86 Seloo Kopara 0.591 32.8% 85.4%
87 Karanja Sawal 0.590 29.0% 87.1%
88 Ashti Tarasawanga 0.589 38.2% 79.6%
89 Hinganghat Wani 0.587 42.4% 74.9%
90 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 0.586 45.3% 71.8%
91 Ashti Drugwada 0.585 41.2% 75.7%
65
Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure
Sr.No.
Block GPFinancialInclusion
Index
% of HHwith SHGmember
% ofbank
accounts
92 Arvi Dahegaon (Gondi) 0.584 30.8% 86.0%
93 Wardha Inzapur 0.583 44.5% 72.2%
94 Ashti Wadala 0.582 29.1% 87.3%
95 Arvi Salfal 0.579 31.4% 84.5%
96 Devoli Sendari 0.577 40.4% 75.0%
97 Ashti Sahur 0.574 31.5% 83.4%
98 Arvi Bodad 0.571 24.7% 89.5%
99 Wardha Bodad 0.571 60.2% 78.4%
100 Hinganghat Wela 0.570 40.7% 73.4%
101 Ashti Bambarda 0.568 32.9% 80.7%
102 Ashti Lahan Arvi 0.568 34.7% 78.9%
103 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.567 21.4% 92.1%
104 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 0.564 27.3% 85.4%
105 Karanja Dhawasa 0.560 41.5% 87.6%
106 Karanja Bondar Thana 0.559 32.1% 79.7%
107 Arvi Bedhona 0.558 31.0% 80.6%
108 Arvi Rohana 0.553 23.6% 87.0%
109 Ashti Navin Ashti 0.553 32.4% 78.2%
110 Hinganghat Khangaon 0.552 32.7% 77.6%
111 Hinganghat Rohankheda 0.552 30.9% 79.5%
112 Karanja Pardi 0.550 25.9% 84.2%
113 Karanja Bihadi 0.545 26.4% 82.6%
114 Samudrapur Khandala 0.544 36.2% 72.6%
115 Hinganghat Jamani 0.543 35.9% 72.7%
116 Hinganghat Fukata 0.535 31.6% 75.4%
117 Arvi Panjara Bothali 0.532 30.9% 75.4%
118 Hinganghat Donduda 0.532 26.2% 80.2%
119 Karanja Jasapur 0.532 23.9% 82.5%
120 Karanja Kannamwar Gram 0.525 15.4% 89.6%
122 Arvi Morangana 0.524 24.2% 80.6%
121 Hinganghat Veni 0.524 24.8% 80.0%
Wardha Development Report
66
Sr.No.
Block GPFinancialInclusion
Index
% of HHwith SHGmember
% ofbank
accounts
124 Arvi Deurwada 0.516 23.9% 79.4%
123 Arvi Umari(Sukali) 0.516 22.0% 81.3%
125 Arvi Dahegaon Mustafa 0.498 21.3% 78.3%
127 Hinganghat Sawli Wagh 0.496 26.7% 72.5%
126 Seloo Akoli 0.496 25.7% 73.5%
128 Hinganghat Pohana 0.495 26.8% 72.1%
129 Hinganghat Gadegaon 0.490 21.4% 76.6%
131 Arvi Malegaon Theka 0.485 17.2% 79.8%
130 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 0.485 20.7% 76.4%
132 Arvi Belhara 0.484 19.5% 77.3%
133 Arvi Kawadi 0.482 30.6% 65.7%
134 Arvi Sawangi 0.482 21.2% 75.2%
135 Hinganghat Wadner 0.468 16.4% 77.3%
136 Hinganghat Dhamangaon 0.466 22.9% 70.3%
137 Wardha Dhamangaon 0.466 65.3% 82.2%
138 Arvi Saldara 0.461 13.6% 78.7%
139 Arvi Bhadod 0.451 72.0% 83.1%
140 Hinganghat Satefal 0.446 9.3% 80.0%
141 Wardha Wadadh 0.445 8.4% 80.6%
142 Ashti Bhishnur 0.444 15.0% 73.8%
143 Hinganghat Kapshi 0.444 13.6% 75.3%
144 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.442 22.7% 65.6%
145 Hinganghat Warud 0.434 18.7% 68.1%
146 Ashti Pilapur 0.413 3.1% 79.5%
147 Hinganghat Allipur 0.413 11.4% 71.2%
148 Hinganghat Yerla 0.408 7.8% 73.7%
149 Hinganghat Jangona 0.392 7.4% 71.0%
150 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.391 7.5% 70.7%
151 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.391 59.1% 82.1%
152 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.345 7.8% 61.2%
67
Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure
Annexure 5.2: Gramapanchayats with Household Infrastructure Index
SN
Blo
ck
GP
Hou
seh
old
Infr
ast
ruct
ure
In
dex
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
s w
ith
elec
tric
ity
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
s w
ith
LP
G
Per
cen
tage
of
Ow
ned
hou
ses
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
sd
rin
kin
g w
ate
rfa
cili
ty
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
s u
sin
g t
oil
ets
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
sw
ith
hygie
nic
Dra
inage
faci
lity
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
sw
ith
hygie
nic
faci
lity
of
garb
age
dis
posa
l
Pare
nta
ge
of
Pacc
a h
ou
se
1 Devoli Yesgaon 0.879 98.43% 80.31% 97.64% 92.13% 89.76% 95.28% 88.19% 61.42%
2 Devoli Palasgaon 0.864 96.77% 81.18% 94.62% 97.31% 84.95% 87.10% 85.48% 63.44%
3 Devoli Bopapur 0.845 96.62% 82.61% 98.07% 88.41% 82.13% 73.43% 78.26% 76.33%
4 Ashti Navin Ashti 0.842 97.80% 83.96% 79.87% 83.02% 86.79% 94.03% 75.16% 73.27%
5 Wardha Bhivapur 0.842 98.36% 73.22% 94.54% 81.97% 73.22% 92.35% 85.79% 73.77%
6 Wardha Peth 0.838 96.14% 77.78% 94.69% 94.69% 85.99% 86.96% 73.43% 60.39%
7 Wardha Bodad 0.826 97.35% 81.42% 91.59% 81.86% 84.07% 82.30% 68.14% 73.89%
8 Devoli Chinchala 0.823 97.87% 77.30% 98.58% 91.49% 90.78% 70.21% 78.01% 53.90%
9 Devoli Chikhali 0.821 97.03% 72.77% 97.03% 82.18% 75.25% 82.18% 87.13% 63.37%
10 Devoli Wabgaon 0.817 93.67% 68.13% 98.05% 88.81% 81.75% 85.40% 82.00% 55.72%
11 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.815 92.67% 58.64% 96.34% 92.15% 84.82% 85.34% 86.39% 56.02%
12 Devoli Kajalsara 0.810 95.55% 74.09% 96.76% 79.76% 85.02% 78.14% 72.47% 65.99%
13 Devoli Pimpalgaon 0.804 92.08% 75.37% 95.01% 86.51% 90.62% 68.91% 74.78% 59.82%
14 Wardha Tigaon 0.803 93.72% 69.96% 91.93% 89.24% 76.68% 80.27% 83.41% 56.95%
15 Wardha Paloti 0.802 93.89% 78.73% 94.87% 81.66% 83.37% 81.66% 66.01% 61.37%
16 Wardha Anji(Moti) 0.800 96.74% 83.04% 91.09% 85.00% 77.25% 82.25% 62.68% 62.25%
17 Devoli Fattepur 0.800 92.45% 75.47% 96.70% 84.43% 81.13% 77.36% 60.38% 72.17%
18 Devoli Sendari 0.796 97.08% 61.40% 95.32% 78.36% 64.91% 88.30% 89.47% 61.99%
19 Ashti Drugwada 0.796 95.15% 69.90% 100.00% 94.94% 66.00% 75.10% 70.04% 66.00%
20 Wardha Kelapur 0.796 93.30% 79.46% 92.41% 95.98% 80.36% 60.71% 67.41% 66.96%
21 Arvi Sorta 0.795 93.58% 69.72% 96.02% 70.34% 74.31% 92.97% 80.43% 58.41%
22 Wardha Wadadh 0.794 96.15% 67.83% 97.20% 64.34% 76.57% 78.32% 86.36% 68.18%
23 Devoli Nagzari 0.794 91.35% 68.88% 96.83% 98.85% 78.39% 87.61% 70.32% 42.65%
24 Ashti Parsoda 0.788 97.78% 72.00% 98.22% 84.89% 83.56% 88.00% 67.11% 38.67%
25 Devoli Loni 0.788 94.27% 71.76% 96.18% 95.04% 66.03% 82.06% 70.99% 53.82%
26 Wardha Lonsawali 0.785 94.53% 69.00% 97.26% 89.36% 73.56% 55.93% 92.71% 55.93%
27 Ashti Lahan Arvi 0.784 95.45% 67.72% 94.85% 81.78% 80.40% 93.07% 78.61% 35.45%
28 Wardha Selukate 0.781 93.61% 75.55% 89.87% 79.74% 85.46% 76.65% 62.56% 61.67%
29 Seloo Wadgaon Khurd 0.779 97.16% 86.17% 97.87% 90.07% 90.07% 49.65% 54.61% 57.80%
Wardha Development Report
68
SN
Blo
ck
GP
Hou
seh
old
Infr
ast
ruct
ure
In
dex
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
s w
ith
elec
tric
ity
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
s w
ith
LP
G
Per
cen
tage
of
Ow
ned
hou
ses
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
sd
rin
kin
g w
ate
rfa
cili
ty
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
s u
sin
g t
oil
ets
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
sw
ith
hygie
nic
Dra
inage
faci
lity
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
sw
ith
hygie
nic
faci
lity
of
garb
age
dis
posa
l
Pare
nta
ge
of
Pacc
a h
ou
se
30 Wardha Nimgaon 0.778 94.89% 71.59% 95.45% 82.95% 78.98% 69.89% 62.50% 66.48%
31 Allipur 0.777 94.79% 86.55% 90.15% 78.19% 84.09% 68.20% 58.39% 61.53%
32 Wardha Dhamangaon 0.776 88.55% 66.03% 94.66% 77.10% 77.86% 80.53% 74.05% 61.83%
33 Khandala 0.774 95.98% 82.91% 96.48% 94.47% 91.96% 43.72% 67.34% 46.73%
34 Devoli Talni 0.774 86.54% 66.83% 99.04% 88.46% 81.25% 71.63% 72.60% 52.88%
35 Wardha Talegaon(Ta) 0.774 97.63% 88.13% 93.19% 37.87% 73.68% 81.22% 73.89% 73.58%
36 Wardha Dhotra(Ste) 0.768 94.27% 75.00% 95.31% 73.96% 70.83% 71.35% 73.44% 60.42%
37 Arvi Deurwada 0.767 95.68% 62.82% 97.12% 92.22% 79.54% 74.64% 59.94% 51.59%
38 Wardha Satoda 0.764 97.24% 89.14% 87.52% 65.32% 87.20% 63.37% 43.60% 77.96%
39 Devoli Vijaygopal 0.764 93.12% 72.19% 93.12% 71.63% 67.28% 84.55% 72.89% 56.04%
40 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 0.763 91.33% 69.66% 94.43% 81.73% 76.78% 80.19% 64.71% 51.70%
41 Ashti Sahur 0.758 93.81% 64.60% 93.81% 77.76% 63.44% 94.39% 79.69% 38.68%
42 Kajalsara 0.757 93.75% 67.86% 93.30% 86.61% 64.29% 70.09% 88.39% 41.52%
43 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 0.757 96.64% 86.71% 93.93% 44.64% 83.79% 73.50% 61.21% 65.29%
44 Devoli Borgaon Aloda 0.756 94.57% 83.48% 95.00% 85.43% 81.09% 38.26% 68.91% 58.26%
45 Washi 0.756 96.48% 87.28% 92.17% 79.06% 60.86% 55.38% 88.06% 45.40%
46 Devoli Agargaon 0.752 92.69% 67.12% 96.35% 71.00% 83.56% 74.20% 74.89% 42.01%
47 Wardha Inzapur 0.751 98.84% 83.24% 86.99% 54.62% 82.08% 58.96% 62.72% 73.70%
48 Hiwara 0.749 97.08% 78.71% 96.45% 95.62% 78.71% 25.26% 79.96% 47.39%
49 Wardha 0.747 94.37% 72.68% 92.11% 56.34% 76.62% 63.38% 80.00% 62.25%
50 Karanja Kinhala 0.745 96.08% 61.76% 95.59% 98.53% 85.29% 80.39% 49.02% 29.41%
51 Yerla 0.740 94.69% 76.54% 94.13% 74.30% 77.65% 60.89% 58.38% 55.31%
52 Ashti Wadala 0.738 93.99% 45.65% 96.70% 81.38% 66.37% 92.49% 85.59% 28.53%
53 Devoli Amboda 0.738 93.33% 83.33% 100.00% 83.33% 78.33% 31.67% 75.00% 45.00%
54 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 0.737 93.70% 82.98% 94.37% 80.83% 72.39% 58.98% 38.74% 67.83%
55 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 0.737 95.74% 85.85% 90.27% 47.81% 72.40% 70.55% 52.84% 74.15%
56 Karanja Jasapur 0.732 95.52% 64.68% 97.01% 100.00% 97.39% 71.14% 36.32% 23.66%
57 Arvi 0.729 95.10% 60.49% 97.00% 79.84% 65.12% 76.84% 69.48% 38.96%
58 Seloo Zadshi 0.724 94.18% 83.58% 93.35% 86.90% 80.04% 51.77% 37.01% 52.18%
59 Sawli Wagh 0.724 91.41% 80.62% 89.76% 72.21% 71.30% 53.93% 63.80% 55.94%
Hinganghat
Samudrapur
(Khanderao)
Hinganghat
Samudrapur
Samudrapur
Hinganghat
Hinganghat
Dahegaon Miskin
Dahegaon (Gondi)
69
Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure
SN
Blo
ck
GP
Hou
seh
old
Infr
ast
ruct
ure
In
dex
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
s w
ith
elec
tric
ity
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
s w
ith
LP
G
Per
cen
tage
of
Ow
ned
hou
ses
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
sd
rin
kin
g w
ate
rfa
cili
ty
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
s u
sin
g t
oil
ets
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
sw
ith
hygie
nic
Dra
inage
faci
lity
Per
cen
tage
of
Hou
seh
old
sw
ith
hygie
nic
faci
lity
of
garb
age
dis
posa
l
Pare
nta
ge
of
Pacc
a h
ou
se
61 Arvi Malegaon Theka 0.723 92.16% 87.75% 98.53% 79.90% 73.53% 60.78% 59.31% 26.47%
62 Seloo Wadgaon(Jangli) 0.723 94.78% 84.78% 96.52% 85.65% 80.87% 47.39% 38.70% 49.57%
63 Seloo Saldoh 0.723 94.49% 78.22% 93.18% 82.68% 80.31% 59.06% 37.27% 53.02%
64 Ubda 0.721 94.20% 76.81% 90.58% 79.35% 59.78% 60.87% 66.37% 48.91%
65 Waigaon (Gond) 0.717 94.21% 80.18% 96.04% 86.28% 83.84% 17.99% 75.61% 39.63%
66 Arvi Rohana 0.715 92.82% 70.68% 95.13% 69.29% 69.41% 75.32% 45.19% 54.23%
67 Wadgaon 0.715 93.84% 77.07% 94.69% 56.90% 73.46% 36.52% 88.75% 50.53%
68 Seloo Khadaki 0.714 93.39% 81.68% 92.49% 81.98% 84.08% 43.24% 40.54% 53.45%
69 Devoli Hiwra Kaware 0.714 88.85% 47.12% 97.48% 84.53% 58.27% 65.11% 76.62% 52.88%
70 Ashti Bhishnur 0.713 95.33% 46.00% 97.67% 79.00% 59.67% 88.33% 80.33% 24.33%
71 Faridpur 0.713 95.35% 82.56% 93.80% 29.84% 61.24% 70.16% 95.74% 41.47%
72 Sawangi(Zade) 0.712 89.52% 76.61% 91.13% 50.54% 69.09% 54.03% 94.09% 44.89%
73 Wadner 0.712 95.70% 85.55% 88.36% 74.22% 73.36% 56.95% 33.05% 62.66%
74 Seloo Waghala 0.711 94.94% 80.38% 95.89% 89.56% 77.22% 43.04% 38.92% 49.05%
75 Veni 0.711 96.64% 69.75% 94.12% 85.29% 60.50% 53.78% 54.20% 54.62%
76 Seloo Sukali(Station) 0.711 95.31% 78.59% 95.60% 89.15% 78.30% 46.63% 33.14% 51.91%
77 Ashti Ranwadi 0.711 95.74% 52.79% 97.05% 84.92% 60.98% 76.39% 69.84% 30.82%
78 Yenora 0.710 92.37% 76.71% 93.57% 79.92% 66.67% 50.60% 46.99% 61.45%
79 Seloo Helodi 0.708 91.25% 75.94% 95.00% 88.75% 82.50% 44.38% 41.25% 47.19%
80 Dhondgaon 0.707 94.61% 66.58% 93.26% 58.22% 69.54% 62.80% 84.91% 35.85%
81 Karda 0.707 92.45% 66.04% 86.79% 97.73% 81.13% 47.17% 67.92% 26.42%
82 Devoli Babulgaon 0.705 89.42% 46.63% 93.27% 94.71% 68.27% 51.92% 74.52% 45.19%
83 Seloo Jaypur 0.702 96.54% 78.85% 94.23% 93.08% 84.62% 37.69% 29.23% 47.69%
84 Wela 0.699 93.85% 80.36% 87.70% 65.67% 73.61% 53.77% 41.67% 62.70%
85 Arvi Parsodi 0.693 92.11% 60.53% 97.37% 77.89% 71.58% 57.89% 61.58% 35.79%
86 Lasanpur 0.692 90.43% 82.62% 96.45% 50.13% 70.03% 21.41% 90.43% 52.14%
87 Wardha Ganeshpur 0.691 89.52% 66.81% 89.96% 52.40% 75.11% 52.84% 63.32% 62.88%
88 Pohana 0.691 92.09% 83.33% 90.07% 75.42% 72.56% 67.00% 34.51% 37.54%
89 Satefal 0.689 92.86% 79.05% 93.81% 62.86% 70.71% 49.76% 45.48% 56.67%
90 Karanja Kajali 0.686 95.73% 70.66% 90.88% 58.12% 97.49% 67.81% 27.64% 40.17%
Samudrapur
Samudrapur
Samudrapur
Samudrapur
Samudrapur
Hinganghat
Hinganghat
Hinganghat
Samudrapur
Samudrapur
Hinganghat
(Tembhari)
Samudrapur
Hinganghat
Hinganghat
Wardha Development Report
70
SN
Blo
ck
GP
Ho
use
ho
ldIn
fra
stru
ctu
re I
nd
ex
Per
cen
tag
e o
fH
ou
seh
old
s w
ith
elec
tric
ity
Per
cen
tag
e o
fH
ou
seh
old
s w
ith
LP
G
Per
cen
tag
e o
fO
wn
ed h
ou
ses
Per
cen
tag
e o
f H
ou
seh
old
sd
rin
kin
g w
ate
rfa
cili
ty
Per
cen
tag
e o
fH
ou
seh
old
s u
sin
g t
oil
ets
Per
cen
tag
e o
f H
ou
seh
old
sw
ith
hy
gie
nic
Dra
ina
ge
faci
lity
Per
cen
tag
e o
f H
ou
seh
old
sw
ith
hy
gie
nic
fa
cili
ty o
fg
arb
ag
e d
isp
osa
l
Pa
ren
tag
e o
f P
acc
a h
ou
se
91 Seloo Kopara 0.685 92.83% 79.25% 94.72% 88.68% 77.74% 42.64% 31.32% 41.13%
92 Arvi Bhadod 0.685 94.76% 35.41% 99.64% 83.65% 97.41% 71.54% 27.10% 39.00%
93 Tas 0.685 90.18% 75.60% 93.15% 67.56% 74.11% 39.58% 66.37% 41.37%
94 Dhamangaon 0.684 90.31% 74.89% 94.27% 71.81% 67.84% 42.29% 46.70% 59.47%
95 Hinganghat Fukata 0.684 93.10% 74.41% 91.83% 66.42% 68.06% 46.64% 51.72% 54.99%
96 Arvi Morangana 0.683 93.14% 58.83% 93.48% 77.70% 60.03% 77.70% 53.34% 32.25%
97 Ashti Pilapur 0.683 93.75% 28.13% 97.50% 90.63% 71.25% 50.63% 93.75% 20.63%
98 Arvi Bodad 0.680 93.84% 52.74% 96.58% 53.42% 64.38% 71.23% 53.42% 58.22%
99 Hinganghat Rohankheda 0.680 96.81% 75.00% 93.09% 76.06% 64.36% 50.53% 30.32% 57.45%
100 Ashti Tarasawanga 0.674 89.59% 50.00% 94.90% 70.82% 77.76% 79.18% 45.31% 31.63%
101 Hinganghat Wani 0.673 93.27% 81.43% 91.02% 60.61% 67.35% 57.55% 35.92% 51.63%
102 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.668 95.04% 77.27% 90.70% 73.55% 55.99% 41.12% 46.90% 53.93%
103 Arvi Umari(Sukali) 0.668 90.00% 50.00% 95.00% 72.00% 85.00% 74.00% 26.00% 42.00%
104 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 0.666 91.64% 69.90% 91.97% 66.56% 62.21% 41.80% 53.50% 54.85%
105 Karanja Ekarjun 0.664 96.90% 58.03% 91.83% 67.89% 72.39% 78.03% 28.73% 37.18%
106 Arvi Borgaon 0.664 90.69% 44.61% 96.08% 44.12% 60.29% 70.10% 54.90% 70.10%
107 Hinganghat Umari 0.661 89.92% 73.30% 93.73% 61.85% 66.21% 41.69% 43.60% 58.86%
108 Arvi Belhara 0.659 96.10% 38.96% 96.75% 66.88% 96.58% 70.78% 22.73% 38.76%
109 Samudrapur Nirgudi 0.659 94.90% 58.67% 97.96% 71.94% 67.35% 28.06% 76.02% 32.14%
110 Ashti Bambarda 0.658 95.47% 41.15% 96.71% 53.09% 53.50% 74.49% 88.48% 23.87%
111 Seloo Juwadi 0.657 93.26% 68.44% 96.10% 89.72% 63.12% 35.11% 41.49% 38.30%
112 Hinganghat Kapshi 0.655 90.51% 76.61% 93.22% 68.47% 51.53% 44.75% 40.34% 58.31%
113 Seloo Salai(Kala) 0.655 91.75% 85.57% 92.78% 82.47% 71.65% 27.32% 26.29% 45.88%
114 Arvi 0.653 95.22% 51.20% 97.85% 70.10% 67.94% 66.99% 31.58% 41.15%
115 Karanja Selgaon Lawane 0.652 95.01% 50.73% 95.31% 55.43% 67.74% 73.31% 48.09% 36.36%
116 Seloo Dindoda 0.652 94.44% 74.21% 98.02% 85.32% 73.81% 27.78% 31.35% 36.51%
117 Hinganghat Jamani 0.652 89.67% 69.00% 90.27% 61.70% 62.61% 48.33% 48.33% 51.37%
118 Hinganghat Warud 0.650 92.09% 64.87% 91.14% 66.77% 68.99% 37.34% 42.09% 56.65%
119 Seloo Takali(Kite) 0.649 94.41% 68.53% 91.61% 82.52% 80.42% 40.56% 25.17% 36.36%
120 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.649 97.22% 80.09% 95.83% 82.41% 76.39% 27.31% 21.76% 38.43%
Samudrapur
Hinganghat
Dahegaon Mustafa
121 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.648 89.76% 69.88% 88.86% 78.61% 69.58% 59.64% 14.46% 47.29%
71
Financial Inclusion and Household infrastructure
SN
Blo
ck
GP
Ho
use
ho
ldIn
fra
stru
ctu
re I
nd
ex
Per
cen
tag
e o
fH
ou
seh
old
s w
ith
elec
tric
ity
Per
cen
tag
e o
fH
ou
seh
old
s w
ith
LP
G
Per
cen
tag
e o
fO
wn
ed h
ou
ses
Per
cen
tag
e o
f H
ou
seh
old
sd
rin
kin
g w
ate
rfa
cili
ty
Per
cen
tag
e o
fH
ou
seh
old
s u
sin
g t
oil
ets
Per
cen
tag
e o
f H
ou
seh
old
sw
ith
hy
gie
nic
Dra
ina
ge
faci
lity
Per
cen
tag
e o
f H
ou
seh
old
sw
ith
hy
gie
nic
fa
cili
ty o
fg
arb
ag
e d
isp
osa
l
Pa
ren
tag
e o
f P
acc
a h
ou
se
122 Samudrapur Sewa 0.647 90.68% 67.70% 96.89% 84.47% 78.26% 9.32% 62.11% 27.95%
123 Hinganghat Shekapur(Mo) 0.642 91.53% 71.90% 92.56% 61.36% 67.36% 44.83% 40.29% 43.60%
124 Hinganghat Gadegaon 0.641 91.67% 68.45% 87.50% 73.81% 61.31% 39.29% 45.24% 45.83%
125 Arvi Panjara Bothali 0.641 83.33% 50.97% 96.14% 76.57% 66.67% 61.59% 44.93% 32.85%
126 Ashti Thar 0.641 89.39% 34.24% 94.69% 41.80% 67.85% 80.23% 79.10% 25.72%
127 Arvi Bedhona 0.640 94.30% 39.87% 97.47% 60.76% 96.46% 51.90% 28.50% 43.00%
128 Seloo Deulgaon 0.635 91.48% 76.37% 95.88% 81.87% 71.43% 15.11% 31.59% 44.51%
129 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.629 90.12% 77.12% 89.60% 60.66% 72.62% 32.06% 30.68% 50.26%
130 Arvi Salfal 0.628 91.82% 55.00% 95.91% 58.64% 55.00% 53.64% 50.45% 42.27%
131 Karanja Parsodi 0.623 95.38% 50.42% 94.96% 60.10% 75.21% 57.56% 36.97% 28.57%
132 Hinganghat Khangaon 0.615 94.26% 70.42% 89.18% 62.25% 67.99% 37.31% 27.15% 43.71%
133 Hinganghat Donduda 0.614 94.29% 70.70% 91.00% 63.33% 62.14% 36.19% 22.62% 50.71%
134 Hinganghat Jangona 0.608 89.02% 68.26% 91.89% 65.16% 11.93% 45.58% 55.13% 59.67%
135 Karanja Sawli Kh 0.608 94.07% 54.80% 90.23% 58.99% 57.89% 54.28% 34.21% 41.71%
136 Karanja Pardi 0.600 94.83% 52.35% 92.90% 51.50% 65.46% 70.04% 24.31% 28.76%
137 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.596 87.70% 59.55% 96.44% 67.31% 69.90% 22.65% 34.63% 38.51%
138 Arvi Sawangi 0.595 88.14% 31.36% 97.46% 68.64% 63.56% 58.47% 27.12% 41.53%
139 Ashti Pandhurna 0.595 88.42% 33.73% 94.41% 53.09% 51.50% 72.26% 60.88% 22.00%
140 Karanja Sawal 0.593 95.04% 30.53% 96.18% 59.16% 97.20% 20.99% 44.27% 30.92%
141 Karanja Kundi 0.591 94.13% 50.47% 94.60% 29.58% 76.06% 49.30% 40.61% 37.79%
142 Karanja Bihadi 0.584 92.72% 52.11% 88.51% 40.23% 61.69% 69.35% 34.87% 27.97%
143 Arvi Saldara 0.582 85.45% 18.89% 96.59% 48.92% 53.87% 58.20% 77.09% 26.63%
144 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 0.581 95.16% 45.81% 88.39% 47.74% 70.65% 44.84% 43.23% 28.71%
145 Seloo Akoli 0.581 84.46% 55.44% 95.16% 70.12% 48.36% 33.68% 40.93% 36.27%
146 Karanja Bondar Thana 0.578 94.14% 23.10% 90.69% 59.31% 68.62% 58.62% 40.00% 27.59%
147 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.573 94.97% 52.20% 92.45% 25.79% 66.04% 57.86% 30.19% 38.99%
148 Arvi Kawadi 0.571 74.64% 34.45% 97.13% 76.56% 57.89% 52.63% 32.54% 30.62%
149 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 0.567 93.62% 55.32% 92.55% 47.52% 67.38% 33.69% 29.08% 34.40%
150 Karanja 0.559 93.80% 41.24% 91.91% 64.69% 59.84% 44.47% 30.19% 20.75%
151 Karanja Dhawasa 0.539 93.38% 39.71% 88.60% 36.76% 63.97% 53.31% 29.78% 25.37%
152 Karanja Umari 0.508 95.60% 38.34% 91.71% 35.75% 65.80% 39.38% 13.47% 26.42%
Kannamwar Gram
Wardha Development Report
72
6.
Percolation of
Government
Schemes
In this life we cannot do great things. We can only do small things with great love.
- Mother Teresa
4. Percentage of eligible HH who have taken benefit of
Student Scholarship
5. Percentage of eligible HH who have taken benefit of
MGNREGA
6. Percentage of eligible HH who have taken benefit of
ShravanbalYojana
7. Percentage of eligible HH who have taken benefit of
Magel tyala shetatale
8. Percentage of eligible HH who have taken benefit of
Irrigation wellYojana
9. Percentage of HH in which at least one member is
taking benefit of Maha-e-service Kendra
10. Percentage of HH in which at least one member is
taking benefit ofAaple Sarakar Portal
Eligible population is the population eligible for that
scheme. For example population eligible for students'
free bus pass included those households who have
students learning in schools. For calculating awareness
percolation index both the percentage of eligible
households who are aware of the scheme as well as those
who have taken benefit of the scheme were considered.
Grampanchayats with their Awareness percolation
index are given in Annexure 6.1 at the end of this
chapter.
The Gram panchayat with highest Awareness
percolationindex isYeasgaon in Devoli Block (0.795)
and lowest is Bedhona in Arvi block (Index: 0.164).It is
interesting to note that Yesgaon in Devoli is at the top as
far as Financial Inclusion, Household infrastructure and
Awareness percolation index are considered. This is the
indication that the people have taken benefits of the
schemes to improve their housing conditions.
The top 10 Gram panchayats in terms of Financial
Inclusion index are as follows:
4. Which Gram panchayat is highest in terms of
Awareness percolation index and which is
lowest?
5. Which are the top 10 Gram panchayats in
Awareness percolation index?
In addition to GDPI and dimension wise indices
awareness percolation index of various schemes was
calculated. The methodology of index calculation was
same as described in Chapter 1.
The schemes were decided on the basis of discussion
with district authorities.
The first step is organization of all Grampanchayat on
the basis of descending index (Grampanchayat with
highest index at the top and with least index in the
bottom). Then the four quartiles (Categories) of villages
are formed by using standard statistical method. The
details of each category are as follows:
1 Quartile 1 Top 38 Very High
2 Quartile 2 Middle 38 High
3 Quartile 3 Lower Middle 38 Medium
4 Quartile 4 Lowest 38 Poor
Grampanchayats
Gram panchayats
Gram panchayats
Gram panchayats
The above classification will provide a clear guideline to
the district administrators regarding the Grampanchayat
where they need to intervene.
The indicators used for finding Awareness percolation
index of schemes are as follows:
1. Percentage of eligible HH who have taken benefit of
Indira Gandhi PensionYojana
2. Percentage of eligible HH who have taken benefit of
GharkulYojana
3. Percentage of eligible HH who have taken benefit of
Student monthly bus pass
1. Which schemes were selected for study?
2. How the Grampanchayats are categorized on
the basis ofAwareness percolation index?
Category Quartile Details Category
nameNumber
3. Which indicators are used to find Awareness
percolation index?
Wardha Development Report
74
Block Gram panchayat Awareness
percolation index
6. Which are the lowest 10 Gram panchayats in
Awareness percolation index?
Block Gram panchayat Awareness
Percolation Index
Devoli Yesgaon 0.795
Ashti Sahur 0.784
Ashti Thar 0.759
Ashti Wadala 0.750
Ashti Bambarda 0.745
Ashti Tarasawanga 0.744
Arvi Sorta 0.730
Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.716
Ashti Parsoda 0.708
Ashti Pandhurna 0.700
The lowest 10 Gram panchayats are as follows:
Devoli Sendari 0.373
Samudrapur Tas 0.369
Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.357
Hinganghat Allipur 0.347
Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.342
Samudrapur Sewa 0.340
Arvi Kawadi 0.336
Arvi Saldara 0.318
Arvi Belhara 0.240
Arvi Bedhona 0.164
7. Which are the middle 10 Gram panchayats in
Awareness percolation index?
Block Grampanchayat Awareness
Percolation Index
8. How many Gram panchayats in different block
are in very high, high, middle and poor category
in terms ofAwareness percolation index?
9. What are the encouraging factors as seen from
Awareness percolation index?
�
The middle 10 Grampanchayats are as follows:
Wardha Bodad 0.518
Wardha Satoda 0.514
Devoli Hiwra Kaware 0.514
Samudrapur Dhondgaon 0.512
Wardha Dahegaon Miskin 0.506
Arvi Deurwada 0.504
Samudrapur Ubda 0.503
Hinganghat Jamani 0.501
Hinganghat Yenora 0.501
Samudrapur Washi 0.501
Figure 5.1 provides the picture of block wise status of
Grampanchayat.
Ashti and Karanaja block have maximum number of
Grampanchayats with very high Awareness percolation
index. Seloo has no Grampanchayat with very high
index
There is good awareness about the schemes as the
Figure 5.1 : Number of Gram panchayats in each category of Awareness percolation index, block wise
411
3 3
11
15
2
1
63
7
27
1065 9
97
271
7
13
33
4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Very High High Medium Low
75
Percolation of Government Schemes
median in 0.505 indicating more than half of the
population is aware of the schemes.
The correlation among GPDI and awareness
percolation index is positive implying generating
awareness of schemes and providing benefits to
eligible can lead to improved development of
GramPanchayats
Following are the concerns emerging from
Financial Inclusion index:
�
10. What are the concerns those are emerging from
Awareness percolation index?
�
�
�
The awareness about Aapale Sarkar Portal is very
less (Maximum 20 % households are aware of that
portal.)
Awareness about MGNREGA seems to be
moderate.
The block of Hiangnaghat has highest number of
Grampanchayats with less awareness of schemes.
Wardha Development Report
76
77
Percolation of Government Schemes
Sr.
No.
Blo
ck
GP
Aw
aren
ess
Percola
tion
In
dex
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Ind
ira
Gan
dh
i P
en
sion
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
Hw
ho h
ave t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Gh
ark
ulY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tm
on
thly
bu
s p
ass
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tS
ch
ola
rsh
ip
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
MG
NR
EG
A
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Sh
ravan
balY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Magel
tyala
sh
eta
tale
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Irrig
ati
on
well
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing
ben
efi
t of
Mah
a-e
-servic
e K
en
dra
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing b
en
efi
tof
Aap
le S
arak
ar
Porta
l
1 Devoli Yesgaon 0.795 72.73% 100.00% 96.97% 98.48% 97.64% 90.91% 89.47% 81.58% 65.35% 2.36%
2 Ashti Sahur 0.784 83.75% 93.82% 97.33% 96.69% 95.94% 78.75% 97.18% 96.24% 34.43% 9.86%
3 Ashti Thar 0.759 79.27% 95.96% 91.37% 91.06% 94.53% 91.46% 90.44% 89.34% 27.97% 7.88%
4 Ashti Wadala 0.750 88.46% 97.41% 92.80% 91.06% 89.19% 82.69% 83.83% 83.23% 38.44% 3.00%
5 Ashti Bambarda 0.745 100.00% 98.25% 97.78% 55.17% 95.06% 90.48% 84.03% 83.19% 36.21% 4.94%
6 Ashti Tarasawanga 0.744 68.42% 96.70% 90.80% 94.53% 96.53% 94.74% 92.88% 95.47% 11.22% 2.65%
7 Arvi Sorta 0.730 57.14% 79.82% 93.33% 98.63% 85.02% 80.95% 68.57% 60.95% 86.24% 18.96%
8 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 0.716 76.00% 98.15% 92.39% 93.33% 85.86% 76.00% 72.22% 75.40% 43.98% 2.62%
9 Ashti Parsoda 0.708 82.61% 88.37% 69.57% 88.66% 76.00% 86.17% 87.07% 87.07% 35.56% 6.67%
10 Ashti Pandhurna 0.700 77.08% 89.36% 89.20% 90.51% 90.22% 75.00% 86.52% 84.27% 15.77% 2.20%
11 Ashti Navin Ashti 0.688 81.25% 86.11% 84.97% 90.18% 78.62% 75.00% 69.63% 68.89% 34.91% 18.24%
12 Devoli Babulgaon 0.684 48.15% 95.65% 94.57% 94.05% 82.21% 81.48% 69.57% 76.09% 35.58% 6.25%
13 Wardha Lonsawali 0.676 43.90% 97.96% 85.09% 95.45% 80.85% 85.37% 77.12% 64.71% 39.51% 5.78%
14 Wardha Bhivapur 0.667 55.17% 100.00% 75.26% 93.75% 73.77% 75.86% 79.81% 73.08% 34.97% 5.46%
15 Karanja Selgaon Lawane 0.665 80.00% 95.12% 79.58% 78.87% 85.34% 72.00% 41.67% 58.85% 68.91% 4.69%
16 Arvi Parsodi(Tembhari) 0.661 80.00% 90.57% 65.00% 81.08% 72.11% 100.00% 46.51% 44.19% 64.21% 17.37%
17 Karanja Kundi 0.657 83.33% 93.59% 73.80% 75.94% 80.28% 83.33% 50.75% 56.22% 56.34% 3.76%
18 Arvi Dahegaon (Gondi) 0.650 76.92% 78.90% 66.87% 76.54% 77.66% 76.92% 61.54% 54.62% 59.40% 20.44%
19 Hinganghat Sawli Wagh 0.646 62.07% 83.82% 85.53% 84.96% 70.75% 41.38% 76.27% 75.85% 52.47% 12.80%
20 Wardha Peth 0.644 15.38% 95.45% 71.70% 97.96% 57.97% 84.62% 81.55% 78.64% 53.14% 7.25%
21 Ashti Bhishnur 0.641 78.57% 85.21% 85.52% 85.82% 69.67% 53.57% 65.41% 64.32% 44.67% 8.67%
22 Karanja Sawal 0.632 75.00% 86.36% 81.90% 81.90% 78.63% 87.50% 43.87% 47.74% 45.04% 4.20%
23 Ashti Lahan Arvi 0.632 79.25% 78.98% 82.07% 84.26% 72.87% 54.72% 66.56% 66.88% 35.25% 11.09%
24 Hinganghat Satefal 0.621 81.63% 78.62% 81.08% 82.51% 65.24% 55.10% 63.00% 56.50% 51.90% 5.48%
25 Ashti Drugwada 0.611 81.08% 84.54% 80.47% 76.03% 65.37% 67.57% 51.02% 55.10% 40.86% 8.56%
26 Wardha Talegaon(Ta) 0.610 43.24% 87.16% 70.23% 85.32% 64.09% 45.95% 66.60% 65.52% 70.38% 11.46%
27 Karanja Bihadi 0.609 71.43% 83.33% 76.11% 77.98% 84.67% 57.14% 46.36% 63.58% 43.30% 5.36%
28 Arvi Borgaon 0.605 45.12% 69.51% 71.20% 78.00% 53.43% 42.40% 24.44% 27.78% 57.84% 6.86%
29 Karanja Kajali 0.601 52.38% 93.67% 77.44% 78.26% 86.32% 71.43% 30.30% 53.79% 53.56% 3.70%
30 Samudrapur Nirgudi 0.599 42.86% 55.10% 59.09% 67.27% 54.08% 35.71% 100.00% 100.00% 82.65% 2.55%
Annexure 6.1: Gram panchayat with Awareness percolation index
Sr.
No.
Blo
ck
GP
Aw
aren
ess
Percola
tion
In
dex
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Ind
ira
Gan
dh
i P
en
sion
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
Hw
ho h
ave t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Gh
ark
ulY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tm
on
thly
bu
s p
ass
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tS
ch
ola
rsh
ip
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
MG
NR
EG
A
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Sh
ravan
balY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Magel
tyala
sh
eta
tale
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Irrig
ati
on
well
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing
ben
efi
t of
Mah
a-e
-servic
e K
en
dra
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing b
en
efi
tof
Aap
le S
arak
ar
Porta
l
31 Karanja Parsodi 0.598 84.62% 83.78% 73.68% 75.53% 81.09% 84.60% 45.10% 51.96% 55.46% 5.88%
32 Karanja Pardi 0.596 60.00% 81.37% 82.34% 75.51% 77.38% 80.00% 52.96% 61.23% 45.13% 6.86%
33 Karanja Dhawasa 0.593 56.25% 87.27% 75.89% 70.37% 72.43% 68.75% 40.88% 68.55% 45.59% 7.35%
34 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 0.591 56.25% 94.00% 71.55% 76.58% 81.94% 56.25% 38.89% 63.49% 48.39% 3.23%
35 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 0.589 58.97% 82.67% 71.11% 82.77% 65.57% 49.57% 55.68% 57.63% 53.66% 11.75%
36 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 0.587 40.43% 69.35% 50.00% 57.64% 43.48% 25.53% 49.65% 48.23% 45.82% 4.68%
37 Karanja Ekarjun 0.587 53.33% 73.47% 79.73% 77.62% 69.30% 80.00% 42.23% 56.18% 43.38% 11.27%
38 Karanja Bondar Thana 0.584 57.14% 73.68% 81.08% 71.30% 66.55% 85.71% 46.70% 48.35% 48.28% 5.17%
39 Karanja Kinhala 0.583 52.38% 70.91% 84.95% 72.04% 61.27% 71.43% 50.00% 51.69% 58.82% 9.80%
40 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 0.581 16.67% 73.91% 83.81% 83.81% 71.63% 83.33% 51.85% 60.74% 46.10% 9.22%
41 Karanja Jasapur 0.581 33.33% 66.67% 81.63% 78.41% 69.15% 66.67% 57.25% 61.83% 51.74% 13.93%
42 Wardha Anji(Moti) 0.576 41.89% 86.07% 70.53% 81.80% 58.12% 56.76% 55.86% 55.86% 63.62% 5.58%
43 Wardha Inzapur 0.574 52.38% 90.70% 64.32% 85.89% 58.38% 47.62% 70.77% 64.62% 33.53% 6.07%
44 Devoli Amboda 0.574 62.50% 76.19% 73.53% 72.73% 65.00% 62.50% 65.79% 60.53% 35.00% 0.00%
45 Devoli Pimpalgaon 0.568 56.14% 88.10% 82.45% 84.70% 70.38% 33.33% 49.47% 54.79% 44.87% 3.81%
46 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 0.568 60.98% 65.49% 61.26% 65.91% 47.52% 29.27% 47.47% 46.46% 42.77% 5.99%
47 Hinganghat Rohankheda 0.566 66.67% 89.74% 74.23% 78.35% 63.30% 41.67% 45.78% 40.96% 56.38% 8.51%
48 Devoli Talni (Khanderao) 0.564 73.53% 93.20% 72.63% 81.52% 63.46% 29.41% 55.56% 53.33% 38.94% 1.92%
49 Seloo Takali(Kite) 0.563 65.00% 88.64% 64.18% 65.67% 67.83% 70.00% 50.77% 49.23% 41.96% 0.00%
50 Wardha Paloti 0.553 50.00% 78.43% 66.28% 83.04% 61.37% 50.00% 56.00% 59.20% 43.28% 5.87%
51 Karanja Sawli Kh 0.552 41.18% 74.51% 77.59% 76.67% 73.65% 58.82% 40.50% 59.14% 46.77% 3.49%
52 Karanja Kharaskhanda 0.551 33.33% 86.67% 70.59% 68.25% 79.87% 66.67% 43.48% 63.04% 30.19% 8.81%
53 Seloo Kopara 0.549 66.67% 95.45% 62.50% 69.31% 64.53% 77.78% 43.09% 38.21% 30.94% 0.75%
54 Seloo Zadshi 0.544 48.15% 76.19% 73.93% 75.33% 67.78% 60.49% 53.20% 51.23% 34.93% 2.49%
55 Arvi Morangana 0.541 34.88% 62.65% 55.19% 69.72% 64.67% 53.49% 55.37% 56.20% 69.47% 19.21%
56 Seloo Salai(Kala) 0.540 64.29% 89.55% 54.35% 65.48% 52.58% 64.29% 58.95% 53.68% 34.02% 2.58%
57 Seloo Khadaki 0.537 76.47% 84.44% 56.29% 58.91% 56.76% 47.06% 62.16% 57.66% 34.53% 3.00%
58 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 0.534 68.75% 90.70% 63.64% 70.41% 52.31% 50.00% 57.58% 46.46% 31.94% 1.85%
59 Wardha Wadadh 0.533 100.00% 75.00% 65.25% 85.07% 65.03% 0.00% 48.32% 42.95% 46.50% 5.24%
60 Hinganghat Umari 0.532 58.06% 76.19% 63.40% 68.09% 61.04% 41.94% 54.17% 54.17% 48.23% 7.08%
61 Karanja Umari 0.532 71.43% 82.14% 76.02% 76.05% 71.24% 71.43% 42.98% 50.44% 53.63% 7.51%
Wardha Development Report
78
Sr.
No.
Blo
ck
GP
Aw
aren
ess
Percola
tion
In
dex
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Ind
ira
Gan
dh
i P
en
sion
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
Hw
ho h
ave t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Gh
ark
ulY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tm
on
thly
bu
s p
ass
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tS
ch
ola
rsh
ip
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
MG
NR
EG
A
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Sh
ravan
balY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Magel
tyala
sh
eta
tale
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Irrig
ati
on
well
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing
ben
efi
t of
Mah
a-e
-servic
e K
en
dra
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing b
en
efi
tof
Aap
le S
arak
ar
Porta
l
62 Wardha Selukate 0.532 54.17% 85.09% 69.57% 84.83% 59.03% 52.08% 42.95% 40.94% 36.56% 6.83%
63 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 0.530 58.62% 88.14% 55.50% 74.14% 54.56% 56.90% 50.35% 51.06% 32.17% 8.31%
64 Ashti Pilapur 0.528 72.73% 58.93% 67.61% 62.50% 58.75% 36.36% 58.00% 56.00% 48.75% 8.75%
65 Devoli Vijaygopal 0.527 65.09% 86.94% 65.51% 74.32% 61.52% 47.17% 42.55% 43.26% 37.50% 3.09%
66 Devoli Wabgaon 0.526 56.25% 81.34% 75.25% 80.60% 65.45% 35.42% 46.98% 48.84% 32.36% 3.41%
67 Karanja Kannamwar Gram 0.526 54.55% 84.62% 61.22% 58.65% 65.50% 63.64% 30.53% 45.26% 56.60% 5.12%
68 Wardha Ganeshpur 0.522 47.06% 75.00% 57.00% 70.41% 60.70% 52.94% 61.05% 57.89% 34.50% 5.68%
69 Seloo Jaypur 0.521 75.00% 77.78% 51.75% 59.63% 55.77% 75.00% 44.90% 44.90% 34.62% 1.92%
70 Samudrapur Lasanpur 0.521 36.67% 85.23% 80.50% 83.61% 57.93% 23.33% 37.29% 46.19% 66.75% 3.27%
71 Arvi Bodad 0.518 54.39% 80.70% 57.89% 64.91% 60.96% 53.45% 31.03% 32.76% 63.01% 19.18%
72 Wardha Bodad 0.518 85.71% 96.97% 69.75% 81.42% 60.18% 57.14% 63.41% 47.56% 40.27% 7.52%
73 Wardha Satoda 0.514 35.00% 88.64% 49.12% 77.88% 55.11% 40.00% 55.96% 55.96% 46.35% 10.05%
74 Devoli Hiwra Kaware 0.514 44.90% 85.71% 71.20% 80.65% 61.87% 24.49% 58.74% 58.04% 26.98% 1.08%
75 Samudrapur Dhondgaon 0.512 50.00% 71.62% 71.89% 75.41% 50.13% 32.14% 42.08% 44.26% 72.51% 2.43%
76 Wardha Dahegaon Miskin 0.506 29.41% 85.00% 68.54% 77.91% 68.45% 41.18% 50.55% 50.00% 30.99% 3.94%
77 Arvi Deurwada 0.504 60.56% 67.13% 61.99% 67.59% 54.18% 56.34% 29.01% 31.30% 65.99% 10.37%
78 Samudrapur Ubda 0.503 35.29% 66.67% 75.52% 78.17% 51.45% 29.41% 41.94% 50.54% 71.74% 2.17%
79 Hinganghat Jamani 0.501 65.38% 79.10% 58.46% 69.35% 57.75% 42.31% 50.00% 43.75% 28.88% 6.38%
80 Hinganghat Yenora 0.501 50.00% 86.96% 58.33% 62.96% 54.22% 40.00% 51.40% 56.07% 34.94% 6.02%
81 Samudrapur Washi 0.501 30.43% 63.49% 64.23% 72.95% 55.38% 30.43% 49.17% 48.35% 82.97% 3.33%
82 Arvi Malegaon Theka 0.499 37.50% 65.22% 63.51% 76.71% 67.65% 37.50% 33.33% 37.33% 63.73% 16.67%
83 Arvi Rohana 0.495 31.25% 63.03% 56.25% 71.73% 51.45% 54.17% 44.76% 45.16% 63.15% 14.25%
84 Hinganghat Fukata 0.494 50.00% 70.59% 67.15% 72.56% 54.63% 26.92% 53.31% 55.40% 39.38% 3.81%
85 Samudrapur Karda 0.492 50.00% 61.54% 62.96% 59.26% 47.17% 50.00% 43.48% 47.83% 64.15% 5.66%
86 Seloo Dindoda 0.491 58.82% 76.74% 54.17% 68.33% 66.27% 41.18% 42.66% 39.16% 40.87% 2.78%
87 Devoli Borgaon Aloda 0.490 42.00% 87.74% 69.83% 72.84% 62.61% 28.00% 45.09% 47.32% 31.52% 3.04%
88 Devoli Loni 0.484 54.76% 78.16% 75.19% 83.87% 64.89% 38.10% 34.90% 37.58% 11.07% 5.73%
89 Samudrapur Waigaon (Gond) 0.481 42.31% 59.09% 70.59% 78.44% 44.82% 30.77% 32.34% 37.45% 82.62% 3.05%
90 Arvi Salfal 0.479 10.53% 64.81% 54.64% 77.08% 61.82% 57.89% 40.85% 42.25% 55.00% 14.55%
91 Samudrapur Nandori 0.478 23.33% 72.97% 66.46% 77.39% 53.40% 20.00% 39.90% 49.75% 71.67% 3.26%
92 Arvi Dahegaon Mustafa 0.478 42.59% 63.76% 71.55% 81.94% 54.31% 48.15% 24.62% 24.62% 61.48% 4.55%
79
Percolation of Government Schemes
Sr.
No.
Blo
ck
GP
Aw
aren
ess
Percola
tion
In
dex
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Ind
ira
Gan
dh
i P
en
sion
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
Hw
ho h
ave t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Gh
ark
ulY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tm
on
thly
bu
s p
ass
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tS
ch
ola
rsh
ip
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
MG
NR
EG
A
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Sh
ravan
balY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Magel
tyala
sh
eta
tale
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Irrig
ati
on
well
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing
ben
efi
t of
Mah
a-e
-servic
e K
en
dra
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing b
en
efi
tof
Aap
le S
arak
ar
Porta
l
93 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 0.475 38.89% 75.47% 60.63% 78.13% 51.08% 36.11% 30.17% 36.31% 64.78% 3.76%
94 Seloo Akoli 0.475 52.94% 80.56% 54.52% 60.74% 53.37% 47.06% 51.34% 49.11% 23.83% 1.21%
95 Hinganghat Khangaon 0.473 52.50% 74.49% 66.51% 70.65% 53.64% 32.50% 36.57% 42.13% 38.63% 5.74%
96 Seloo Helodi 0.471 37.50% 72.73% 59.31% 66.21% 61.88% 50.00% 45.32% 46.04% 31.56% 0.94%
97 Seloo Deulgaon 0.469 55.00% 79.63% 58.99% 60.57% 50.00% 45.00% 46.20% 40.51% 31.32% 1.37%
98 Hinganghat Dhamangaon 0.467 100.00% 67.24% 65.00% 67.71% 56.39% 18.52% 44.00% 41.00% 4.85% 2.64%
99 Wardha Dhamangaon 0.467 29.41% 94.83% 70.08% 76.58% 62.98% 58.82% 54.62% 50.42% 43.13% 8.40%
100 Devoli Chinchala 0.466 38.10% 81.82% 69.57% 57.35% 50.35% 33.33% 47.37% 40.79% 46.10% 1.42%
101 Wardha Nimgaon 0.461 55.56% 70.83% 66.67% 80.43% 51.70% 22.22% 42.68% 41.46% 27.27% 1.70%
102 Arvi Umari (Sukali) 0.457 42.86% 54.17% 64.71% 74.00% 67.00% 42.86% 31.25% 29.17% 45.00% 6.00%
103 Hinganghat Warud 0.456 67.50% 71.43% 54.47% 59.35% 40.51% 40.00% 44.81% 43.72% 33.23% 1.27%
104 Samudrapur Khandala 0.455 45.00% 70.00% 35.00% 82.61% 49.25% 30.00% 28.57% 34.29% 73.37% 7.04%
105 Devoli Nagzari 0.454 50.00% 58.24% 71.43% 82.91% 59.37% 46.67% 23.81% 29.05% 25.36% 7.20%
106 Hinganghat Gadegaon 0.454 26.70% 68.75% 75.41% 75.41% 42.26% 20.00% 54.12% 44.71% 41.07% 5.95%
107 Seloo Saldoh 0.453 50.00% 81.25% 48.04% 53.93% 50.39% 50.00% 44.19% 39.53% 33.07% 2.10%
108 Hinganghat Donduda 0.448 41.67% 69.72% 64.58% 70.31% 51.43% 20.83% 43.94% 41.41% 41.43% 3.10%
109 Devoli Agargaon 0.443 45.45% 70.23% 55.77% 65.85% 50.23% 34.55% 43.72% 51.52% 23.29% 2.51%
110 Seloo Sukali(Station) 0.443 56.67% 73.81% 39.64% 50.00% 47.80% 56.67% 41.22% 40.46% 34.90% 1.76%
111 Samudrapur Wadgaon 0.436 32.56% 60.47% 55.02% 70.56% 42.46% 25.58% 36.33% 43.53% 66.03% 3.18%
112 Hinganghat Veni 0.435 70.00% 83.82% 48.25% 64.55% 46.22% 30.00% 38.53% 28.44% 21.85% 2.94%
113 Samudrapur Faridpur 0.433 27.27% 67.65% 69.23% 73.98% 46.12% 22.73% 22.56% 23.31% 79.07% 1.55%
114 Seloo Waghala 0.433 0.00% 79.63% 68.93% 73.27% 64.56% 0.00% 53.66% 50.00% 41.14% 1.90%
115 Devoli Chikhali 0.433 47.83% 91.04% 79.63% 83.33% 37.13% 4.35% 29.66% 36.44% 19.80% 3.47%
116 Devoli Palasgaon 0.430 41.67% 59.70% 69.52% 75.00% 54.84% 41.67% 36.19% 38.10% 9.68% 3.76%
117 Hinganghat Jangona 0.428 51.43% 65.17% 61.27% 67.46% 39.86% 28.57% 38.08% 38.08% 33.17% 5.01%
118 Devoli Kajalsara 0.428 55.56% 73.68% 60.38% 74.00% 53.85% 16.67% 28.70% 29.57% 34.41% 1.21%
119 Hinganghat Kajalsara 0.428 11.11% 74.68% 43.33% 54.44% 66.52% 11.11% 32.99% 40.21% 21.43% 9.82%
120 Ashti Ranwadi 0.428 55.17% 48.25% 63.36% 62.10% 40.98% 55.17% 33.10% 29.58% 37.05% 2.95%
121 Devoli Bopapur 0.426 41.67% 82.00% 62.39% 65.14% 57.97% 25.00% 24.00% 29.00% 37.68% 1.45%
122 Arvi Sawangi 0.426 34.78% 59.70% 54.72% 66.04% 55.08% 52.17% 26.67% 26.67% 43.22% 6.78%
Wardha Development Report
80
Sr.
No.
Blo
ck
GP
Aw
aren
ess
Percola
tion
In
dex
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Ind
ira
Gan
dh
i P
en
sion
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
Hw
ho h
ave t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Gh
ark
ulY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tm
on
thly
bu
s p
ass
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Stu
den
tS
ch
ola
rsh
ip
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
MG
NR
EG
A
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Sh
ravan
balY
oja
na
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Magel
tyala
sh
eta
tale
Percen
tage o
f eli
gib
le H
H w
ho
have t
ak
en
ben
efi
t of
Irrig
ati
on
well
Yoja
na
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing
ben
efi
t of
Mah
a-e
-servic
e K
en
dra
Percen
tage o
f H
H i
n w
hic
h a
tle
ast
on
e m
em
eb
ris
tak
ing b
en
efi
tof
Aap
le S
arak
ar
Porta
l
123 Hinganghat Kapshi 0.423 41.67% 63.89% 58.27% 63.78% 41.02% 21.67% 45.60% 44.80% 38.64% 3.73%
124 Wardha Dhotra(Ste) 0.422 60.00% 68.42% 49.02% 77.55% 40.63% 36.00% 37.08% 24.72% 23.96% 4.17%
125 Seloo Wadgaon (Jangli) 0.421 0.00% 100.00% 68.93% 73.27% 54.78% 0.00% 44.00% 40.00% 36.96% 3.48%
126 Wardha Tigaon 0.416 25.00% 71.43% 57.84% 63.37% 39.01% 68.75% 42.39% 40.22% 5.83% 2.24%
127 Hinganghat Wadner 0.416 50.00% 62.77% 52.95% 71.25% 39.53% 25.69% 33.26% 36.63% 37.97% 6.02%
128 Hinganghat Hiwara 0.413 41.38% 68.70% 52.17% 57.78% 45.18% 31.03% 39.86% 39.13% 33.43% 4.22%
129 Samudrapur Hiwara 0.413 25.71% 66.36% 66.54% 77.49% 60.33% 11.43% 43.93% 38.01% 58.04% 5.22%
130 Hinganghat Shekapur(Mo) 0.411 35.14% 62.50% 47.89% 57.75% 48.55% 24.32% 43.06% 47.69% 38.43% 5.79%
131 Arvi Bhadod 0.404 25.00% 73.33% 58.14% 41.86% 59.71% 23.77% 28.71% 50.00% 42.00% 1.72%
132 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 0.402 48.44% 63.09% 58.78% 61.11% 53.56% 23.44% 30.83% 39.10% 20.74% 2.79%
133 Hinganghat Wela 0.401 39.02% 51.65% 50.93% 69.72% 48.81% 29.27% 40.00% 41.00% 26.79% 3.77%
134 Seloo Wadgaon Khurd 0.398 53.13% 63.38% 45.63% 55.00% 46.45% 25.00% 36.73% 40.14% 28.01% 4.61%
135 Hinganghat Wani 0.393 47.69% 53.93% 55.17% 63.91% 43.06% 27.69% 32.28% 39.24% 27.76% 2.24%
136 Wardha Kelapur 0.392 30.77% 91.43% 58.82% 55.88% 41.07% 23.08% 32.26% 36.29% 20.09% 2.23%
137 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 0.390 47.69% 55.06% 48.83% 61.66% 37.57% 38.46% 24.43% 36.43% 32.57% 7.71%
138 Hinganghat Pohana 0.389 49.28% 60.22% 48.52% 58.87% 43.10% 26.09% 32.27% 37.27% 27.95% 5.22%
139 Arvi Panjara Bothali 0.384 37.21% 56.41% 41.95% 59.54% 49.03% 44.19% 20.45% 17.42% 50.24% 7.97%
140 Devoli Fattepur 0.380 5.56% 77.08% 58.16% 67.35% 60.38% 16.67% 24.58% 38.14% 30.19% 1.89%
141 Seloo Juwadi 0.379 55.00% 69.23% 44.37% 56.43% 40.43% 20.00% 29.75% 30.58% 28.72% 4.26%
142 Hinganghat Yerla 0.373 48.00% 70.59% 39.04% 53.85% 35.75% 20.00% 31.33% 33.73% 36.87% 3.91%
143 Devoli Sendari 0.373 38.71% 65.57% 55.17% 56.90% 53.22% 25.81% 25.30% 26.51% 23.39% 2.34%
144 Samudrapur Tas 0.369 25.00% 34.48% 53.89% 61.68% 38.99% 8.33% 34.55% 38.22% 70.83% 3.27%
145 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 0.357 35.14% 45.19% 47.89% 57.75% 38.19% 24.32% 37.67% 39.04% 29.13% 2.27%
146 Hinganghat Allipur 0.347 43.37% 51.33% 43.63% 55.57% 33.09% 18.07% 24.88% 29.31% 43.27% 4.81%
147 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 0.342 35.21% 52.85% 49.40% 54.77% 36.22% 19.72% 28.33% 32.08% 31.37% 2.43%
148 Samudrapur Sewa 0.340 15.00% 61.90% 39.76% 53.09% 33.54% 30.00% 15.12% 20.93% 70.19% 0.62%
149 Arvi Kawadi 0.336 27.59% 52.00% 37.50% 55.17% 45.45% 41.38% 15.49% 16.90% 41.63% 2.87%
150 Arvi Saldara 0.318 35.48% 54.24% 41.73% 62.20% 36.22% 29.03% 6.42% 7.34% 43.65% 2.17%
151 Arvi Belhara 0.240 2.60% 14.94% 12.34% 28.57% 53.20% 53.20% 2.27% 20.45% 50.00% 2.60%
152 Arvi Bedhona 0.164 3.80% 15.19% 15.82% 17.72% 53.79% 15.82% 0.00% 21.80% 16.50% 3.80%
81
Percolation of Government Schemes
7.
Way Ahead
You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that
makes the existing model obsolete.
- R. Buckminster Fuller
The present chapter provides the conclusions and
recommendations based on the quantitative and
qualitative data analysis presented in the previous
chapters. The critical areas are identified where urgent
interventions are required.
Critical areas are those sectors where urgent
interventions are required. They are decided on the basis
of GPDI and Dimension wise index. For deciding
critical areas, the critical value of the indicators other
than education indicators was decided as 0.20, as it
indicates broadly 20 % of the performance in that
indicator. If even 20 % performance is not achieved then
we can safely assume that the Grampanchayat requires
more attention. Indicators having values less than 0.20
were identified as 'critical'.
The Grampanchayats with their critical areas are
provided in Table 7.1. The critical values are observed in
1 What are the 'critical areas' and how are they
decided?
following indicators only and not in others:
Percentage of Households with own land
Percentage of Households with irrigated land
Percentage of farmers doing supplementary
occupation
Percentage of Households having LPG connection
Percentage of Households having at least one
female as member of SHG
Percentage of Households with hygienic facility of
drainage
It is suggested that the district administrators should
intervene in those areas on urgent and priority basis.
The major critical area is the agriculture and irrigation
and farmers doing supplementary occupation. The table
7.2 supports this conclusion.
�
�
�
�
�
�
2 Which are the major critical areas amongst the
surveyed Grampanchayats?
83
Way Ahead
Table 7.1: Critical values of indicators
Sr.No.
Block GP
Percentageof
householdswith own
land
Percentageof
householdswith
irrigatedland
Percentage ofhouseholds
doingsupplementary
occupation
Percentageof
householdswith SHGmember
Percentageof
householdswith LPG
Percentageof
householdswith
hygienicdrainagefacility
1 Arvi Bedhona 7.70%
2 Arvi Belhara 12.64% 19.48%
3 Arvi Bhadod 15.00%
4 Arvi Bodad 14.75% 1.64%
5 Arvi Borgaon 11.96% 6.52%
6 Arvi Dahegaon (Gondi) 11.45%
7 Arvi Dahegaon Mustafa 19.12% 10.78%
8 Arvi Deurwada 12.32% 7.46%
9 Arvi Kawadi 6.76%
10 Arvi Malegaon Theka 7.59% 17.16%
11 Arvi Morangana 11.02%
12 Arvi Panjara Bothali 14.49% 10.37%
13 Arvi Parsodi(Tembhari) 11.49% 11.90%
Sr.No.
Block GP
Percentageof
householdswith own
land
Percentageof
householdswith
irrigatedland
Percentage ofhouseholds
doingsupplementary
occupation
Percentageof
householdswith SHGmember
Percentageof
householdswith LPG
Percentageof
householdswith
hygienicdrainagefacility
14 Arvi Rohana 13.53% 9.58%
15 Arvi Saldara 14.55% 13.76% 13.62% 18.89%
16 Arvi Salfal 13.70% 12.86%
17 Arvi Sawangi 8.70% 13.04%
18 Arvi Sorta 11.71% 10.28%
19 Arvi Umari(Sukali) 18.87% 9.62%
20 Ashti Bambarda 5.30%
21 Ashti Bhishnur 2.08% 9.90% 15.00%
22 Ashti Drugwada 16.50% 11.65%
23 Ashti Lahan Arvi 8.81%
24 Ashti Navin Ashti 8.70%
25 Ashti Pandhurna 7.57% 5.59%
26 Ashti Parsoda 11.48% 4.10%
27 Ashti Pilapur 8.00% 3.13%
28 Ashti Ranwadi 16.33% 10.88%
29 Ashti Sahur 18.60% 14.05%
30 Ashti Tarasawanga 2.37%
31 Ashti Thar 13.00% 13.62%
32 Ashti Wadala 10.56%
33 Devoli Agargaon 7.53% 10.04%
34 Devoli Amboda 0.00% 7.32%
35 Devoli Babulgaon 5.21% 3.13%
36 Devoli Bopapur 5.83% 0.97%
37 Devoli Borgaon Aloda 5.19% 3.90%
38 Devoli Chikhali 6.78% 0.00%
39 Devoli Chinchala 3.90% 2.60%
40 Devoli Fattepur 8.47% 5.93%
41 Devoli Hiwra Kaware 2.05% 3.42%
42 Devoli Kajalsara 11.76% 6.72%
43 Devoli Loni 16.78% 17.45%
44 Devoli Nagzari 15.28% 12.04%
Wardha Development Report
84
Sr.No.
Block GP
Percentageof
householdswith own
land
Percentageof
householdswith
irrigatedland
Percentage ofhouseholds
doingsupplementary
occupation
Percentageof
householdswith SHGmember
Percentageof
householdswith LPG
Percentageof
householdswith
hygienicdrainagefacility
45 Devoli Palasgaon 19.82% 11.71%
46 Devoli Pimpalgaon 9.74% 5.64%
47 Devoli Sendari 3.53% 8.24%
48 Devoli Sonegaon (Aa) 5.84% 6.57%
49 Devoli Talni (Bhagwat) 14.73% 10.85%
50 Devoli Talni (Khanderao) 11.83% 3.23%
51 Devoli Vijaygopal 3.85% 9.09%
52 Devoli Wabgaon 10.55% 5.50%
53 Devoli Yesgaon 12.82% 6.41%
54 Hinganghat Allipur 19.89% 11.76% 11.39%
55 Hinganghat Bhiwapur 10.88% 6.76%
56 Hinganghat Donduda 18.26% 7.83%
57 Hinganghat Fukata 14.19% 6.13%
58 Hinganghat Gadegaon 18.39% 5.75%
59 Hinganghat Hiwara 17.65% 8.50% 7.53%
60 Hinganghat Jamani 7.95%
61 Hinganghat Jangona 18.88% 6.02% 7.40%
62 Hinganghat Kajalsara 3.74% 13.08% 9.38%
63 Hinganghat Kapshi 10.95% 13.87% 13.56%
64 Hinganghat Khangaon 12.76% 14.40%
65 Hinganghat Pimpalgaon 15.38% 6.92%
66 Hinganghat Pohana 10.79% 9.54%
67 Hinganghat Rohankheda 10.81% 3.60%
68 Hinganghat Satefal 15.85% 10.16% 9.29%
69 Hinganghat Sawli Wagh 14.44% 8.45%
70 Hinganghat Sekapur (Bai) 10.37%
71 Hinganghat Selu (Bai) 13.50% 4.91% 7.77%
72 Hinganghat Shekapur(Mo) 10.51% 10.51%
73 Hinganghat Umari 12.09% 11.54%
74 Hinganghat Veni 16.39% 3.28%
75 Hinganghat Wadner 15.07% 8.55% 16.41%
Way Ahead
85
Sr.No.
Block GP
Percentageof
householdswith own
land
Percentageof
householdswith
irrigatedland
Percentage ofhouseholds
doingsupplementary
occupation
Percentageof
householdswith SHGmember
Percentageof
householdswith LPG
Percentageof
householdswith
hygienicdrainagefacility
76 Hinganghat Wani 11.11% 11.11%
77 Hinganghat Warud 13.09% 5.76% 18.67%
78 Hinganghat Wela 17.59% 13.43%
79 Hinganghat Yenora 16.38% 3.45%
80 Hinganghat Yerla 9.23% 6.67% 7.82%
81 Karanja Bihadi 4.58%
82 Karanja Bondar Thana 5.98%
83 Karanja Borgaon(Dhole) 5.19%
84 Karanja Dhawasa 5.03%
85 Karanja Ekarjun 2.39%
86 Karanja Jasapur 9.16%
87 Karanja Kajali 10.61%
88 Karanja Kannamwar Gram 14.43% 4.12%
89 Karanja Kharaskhanda 5.38%
90 Karanja Kinhala 1.69%
91 Karanja Kundi 7.46%
92 Karanja Pardi 5.88%
93 Karanja Parsodi 9.71%
94 Karanja Sawal 5.13%
95 Karanja Sawli Kh 9.22%
96 Karanja Selgaon (Umate) 7.75%
97 Karanja Selgaon Lawane 7.10%
98 Karanja Umari 3.07%
99 Samudrapur Dhondgaon 14.85% 11.39%
100 Samudrapur Faridpur 16.20% 15.54%
101 Samudrapur Hiwara 20.00% 14.63%
102 Samudrapur Karda 6.67%
103 Samudrapur Khandala 6.90%
104 Samudrapur Lasanpur 11.90%
105 Samudrapur Nandori 16.88% 13.92%
106 Samudrapur Nirgudi 18.63% 11.76%
Wardha Development Report
86
Sr.No.
Block GP
Percentageof
householdswith own
land
Percentageof
householdswith
irrigatedland
Percentage ofhouseholds
doingsupplementary
occupation
Percentageof
householdswith SHGmember
Percentageof
householdswith LPG
Percentageof
householdswith
hygienicdrainagefacility
107 Samudrapur Sawangi(Zade) 8.21%
108 Samudrapur Sewa 9.90% 8.91%
109 Samudrapur Tas 10.95% 9.32%
110 Samudrapur Ubda 16.35%
111 Samudrapur Wadgaon 8.97%
112 Samudrapur Waigaon (Gond) 16.00% 6.40%
113 Samudrapur Washi 19.35% 5.38% 17.99%
114 Seloo Akoli 16.38%
115 Seloo Deulgaon 8.59% 11.66%
116 Seloo Juwadi 3.28% 4.92% 15.11%
117 Seloo Dindoda 1.38% 14.48%
118 Seloo Helodi 11.27% 11.27%
119 Seloo Jaypur 4.95% 7.92%
120 Seloo Khadaki 7.63% 5.93%
121 Seloo Kopara 3.01% 5.26%
122 Seloo Salai(Kala) 1.05% 6.32%
123 Seloo Salai(Pevath) 3.03% 4.08%
124 Seloo Saldoh 12.03% 9.02%
125 Seloo Sukali(Station) 5.97% 14.93%
126 Seloo Takali(Kite) 4.55% 6.06%
127 Seloo Wadgaon Khurd 12.67%
128 Seloo Wadgaon(Jangli) 14.29% 11.90%
129 Seloo Waghala 8.77% 15.79%
130 Seloo Zadshi 13.81% 15.24%
131 Wardha Bhivapur 11.01%
132 Wardha Bodad 15.48%
133 Wardha Dahegaon Miskin 15.51%
134 Wardha Dhotra(Ste) 14.13%
135 Wardha Inzapur 18.79% 10.96%
136 Wardha Kelapur 19.38% 17.83%
137 Wardha Lonsawali 18.34% 2.37%
Way Ahead
87
Sr.No.
Block GP
Percentageof
householdswith own
land
Percentageof
householdswith
irrigatedland
Percentage ofhouseholds
doingsupplementary
occupation
Percentageof
householdswith SHGmember
Percentageof
householdswith LPG
Percentageof
householdswith
hygienicdrainagefacility
138 Wardha Nimgaon 18.82%
139 Wardha Paloti 15.91%
140 Wardha Peth 13.89% 15.74%
141 Wardha Salod(Hisapur) 19.74%
142 Wardha Satoda 17.67% 14.91%
143 Wardha Selukate 13.82%
144 Wardha Talegaon(Ta) 12.18%
145 Wardha Tigaon 7.22% 19.59%
146 Wardha Umari(Meghe) 18.90% 17.45%
147 Wardha Wadadh 9.68% 8.39%
148 Wardha Waigaon(Nipani) 16.16%
Table 7.2: Number of GPs with critical values
Number of GPs with Value less than 20%
Among 38 GPs in very
high category of Among
GDPI GPDI
Indicator Among 38 GPs in
poor category of
Percentage of HH with owned land 0 2
Percentage of HH with irrigated land 21 30
Percentage of HH (farmers) doing supplementary 38 35
Percentage of working population in the age group 0 0
Mean Years of Schooling of the population of age 0 0
School life expectancy of the population of age 6-18 0 0
Percentage of population (> 6 years of age) who has 0 0
Percentage of HH with at least one woman as member 0 11
occupation
18-60 years
25 years and above
years of age
no addiction
of SHG
Wardha Development Report
88
Number of GPs with Value less than 20%
Among 38 GPs in very
high category of Among
GDPI GPDI
Indicator Among 38 GPs in
poor category of
Percentage of persons (> 6 years) with bank account 0 0
Percentage of HH with Electricity 0 0
Percentage of HH with LPG 0 1
Percentage of Owned HH 0 0
Percentage of HH with availability of drinking water 0 0
Percentage of HH using individual toilets 0 0
Percentage of HH with hygienic drainage facility 1 1
Percentage of HH with hygienic facility of garbage 1 0
Percentage of pacca house 0 0
for 12 months
disposal
3. What are the major factors that need to be
considered in irrigation?
4. How to improve working of Farmers' Producer
Organizations (FPOs)
�
�
The district administration has implemented Jalyukt
Shiwar Abhiyan in the villages in these selected
Grampanchayats. As per the discussion with the
stakeholders during the survey the Abhiyan has helped
improve irrigation facilities. However there is a long
way to go. Around 69 % farmers have no facility of
water for their farms for the whole land or part of the
land. Hence, initially assistance to create a feasible
source of water could be provided to these farmers.
Majority of the farmers are unaware of the work done in
the Abhiyan. As such the work of Abhiyan should be
conducted in collaboration with the farmers. The
farmers need to be involved in the decision making
about the work to be done.
ATMAshould encourage more and more farmers to
form FPOs.
The FPOs require training on following matters:
The demand for agro-based occupations,
processing units and how to start them; banking
matters, procedures for registration and provisions
of company act, soli testing, quality of seeds,
organic farming and sustainable farming, flower
farming, sericulture, pomegranate production
The training method should involve visit to Tomato
processing units or other agro processing units.
Creating an outlet for the produce of FPOs at
appropriate places
ATMAshould coordinate between organic farming
produce and the selling agencies such as molls
Providing financial assistance for opening agro
processing units
A meeting of banks, agricultural functionaries and
FPOs to be called to address the issues related to
opening bank accounts and other matters.
The Government schemes related to agriculture
can be disseminated through FPOs
FPOs to involve in the grading of seeds by Mahabij
The major issue is marketing of the product of
SHGs. SHGs is require interaction with other
SHGs who have successfully marketed their
products
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
5. How to improve functioning of SHGs?
Way Ahead
89
�
�
�
�
�
6. What methods need to be adopted for
dissemination of Government schemes?
Training for occupations based on local resource
Small responsible jobs requiring collective effort
(for example cleaning of premises, collection of
taxes, surveys in the villages, generating awareness
about Government schemes) may be entrusted to
SHGs thus helping the members to earn additional
income.
Attractive saving schemes and insurance schemes,
if introduced for SHG members and are active, will
enhance their economy habit
Successful SHGs have to be given common
platform to share their experience with other
members.
Asystem for quality control and standards will help
to maintain the production of good quality products
by the SHGs which in turn will raise the market
value of the commodities
Following are some of the ways by which the
information about Government schemes can be
disseminated as per the reposes of the villagers:
�
�
�
7. Which are the focus areas for each of the Gram
panchayat?
8. What is the size of beneficiaries for various
schemes in different GPs?
Displaying posters at Gram panchayat
Displaying posters at popular public places such as
the meeting points, schools' boundary wall, pan
shops
Training a facilitator and equipping him with
tablets so that he/she can give demonstration of e-
services
The report of each Gram Panchayat is prepared
separately which provides focus area of each of the
Gram Panchayat.
The size of beneficiaries is provided in for major
schemes is provided in Table 7.3 below.
Wardha Development Report
90
Block
G.P.
Numberofwodows
Females>60 years og age
HH withNo electricity
BPLHH
SC HH
STHH
OBC HH
HHwith No LPG
Landless HH
HH withMarginal farmers
HHwith Dry farm
HHwith No house
HHwith NoTiolet
HH withNo Drainage facility
HH with no facilityof Garbage disposal
Total HH
Arv
iB
edhona
26
48
967
330
74
95
68
66
60
445
76
113
158
Arv
iB
elhar
a33
38
673
628
30
94
66
71
39
537
51
119
154
Arv
iB
had
od
20
32
930
18
107
19
99
67
58
50
117
43
111
153
Arv
iB
odad
22
30
957
16
70
41
69
84
37
40
342
42
68
146
Arv
iB
org
aon
36
57
19
82
43
14
116
113
112
80
68
663
61
92
204
Arv
iD
aheg
aon
(Gondi)
Arv
iD
aheg
aon
Must
afa
Arv
iD
eurw
ada
75
96
15
143
97
20
137
129
209
83
81
664
88
139
347
Arv
iK
awad
i34
50
53
75
22
91
15
137
135
54
45
575
99
141
209
Arv
iM
aleg
aon
Thek
a
Arv
iM
ora
ngan
a105
112
40
166
56
89
226
240
456
91
79
29
209
130
272
583
Arv
iP
anja
ra
Both
ali
Arv
iP
arso
di
(Tem
bhar
i)
Arv
iR
ohan
a159
185
62
211
112
151
243
253
597
185
164
26
213
213
473
863
Arv
iS
aldar
a58
64
47
118
3277
9262
213
86
92
10
149
135
74
323
Arv
iS
alfa
l30
45
18
54
46
45
62
99
147
53
52
984
102
109
220
Arv
iS
awan
gi
26
27
14
67
89
981
72
33
37
242
49
86
118
Arv
iS
ort
a55
73
21
114
89
49
104
99
216
85
76
11
67
23
64
327
49
59
18
109
66
140
100
145
232
95
81
10
105
85
112
367
87
102
20
149
31
12
213
204
210
150
110
6128
138
286
418
29
33
16
23
321
113
25
125
47
68
245
80
83
204
77
70
69
156
20
206
74
203
276
94
93
14
114
159
228
414
39
38
15
53
471
88
75
103
55
55
345
80
73
190
Tab
le 7
.3 :
Siz
e of
ben
efic
iari
es f
or
dif
fere
nt
sch
emes
Way Ahead
91
Block
Total HH
Arv
iU
mar
i(su
kal
i)22
22
10
24
376
12
50
47
38
25
310
26
74
100
Blo
ckT
ota
l982
1181
470
1771
638
1586
1685
2472
3435
1461
1315
155
1554
1680
2717
5498
Ash
tiB
ambar
da
26
44
11
57
30
74
28
143
111
93
118
781
62
28
243
Ash
tiB
his
hnur
54
71
14
142
47
7132
162
108
169
185
6113
35
59
300
Ash
tiD
rugw
ada
53
74
24
97
60
28
111
105
154
88
70
957
64
77
257
Ash
tiL
ahan
Arv
i91
117
23
157
31
34
394
163
187
254
197
23
93
35
108
505
Ash
tiN
avin
Ash
ti46
64
736
40
53
182
51
180
112
96
34
38
19
79
318
Ash
tiP
andhurn
a83
90
58
141
49
137
175
332
197
234
265
27
235
139
196
501
Ash
tiP
arso
da
44
68
543
50
10
157
63
103
102
97
431
27
74
225
Ash
tiP
ilap
ur
25
30
10
56
13
55
57
115
110
45
39
242
79
10
160
Ash
tiR
anw
adi
34
55
13
114
63
18
134
144
158
129
109
7113
72
92
305
Ash
tiS
ahur
85
114
32
178
110
41
181
183
275
195
185
32
139
29
105
517
Ash
tiT
aras
awan
ga
101
135
51
91
61
47
228
245
153
259
230
25
98
102
268
490
Ash
tiT
har
91
121
66
223
105
267
96
409
299
229
276
33
146
123
130
622
Ash
tiW
adal
a60
84
20
116
57
95
154
181
153
149
115
11
93
25
48
333
Blo
ckT
ota
l793
1067
334
1451
716
866
2029
2296
2188
2058
1982
220
1279
811
1274
4776
Dev
oli
Agar
gao
n117
115
32
131
119
68
241
144
199
168
150
15
70
113
110
438
Dev
oli
Am
boda
11
18
421
112
43
10
19
25
27
013
41
15
60
Dev
oli
Bab
ulg
aon
48
51
22
69
41
57
66
111
112
76
71
13
62
100
53
208
Dev
oli
Bopap
ur
40
54
750
32
38
101
36
104
77
75
333
55
45
207
Dev
oli
Borg
aon
Alo
da
93
105
25
106
150
22
213
76
229
150
189
22
75
284
143
460
Dev
oli
Chik
hal
i45
53
667
58
18
120
55
84
98
100
643
36
26
202
G.P.
Numberofwodows
Females>60 years og age
HH withNo electricity
BPLHH
SC HH
STHH
OBC HH
HHwith No LPG
Landless HH
HH withMarginal farmers
HHwith Dry farm
HHwith No house
HHwith NoTiolet
HH withNo Drainage facility
HH with no facilityof Garbage disposal
Wardha Development Report
92
Block
Total HH
G.P.
Numberofwodows
Females>60 years og age
HH withNo electricity
BPLHH
SC HH
STHH
OBC HH
HHwith No LPG
Landless HH
HH withMarginal farmers
HHwith Dry farm
HHwith No house
HHwith NoTiolet
HH withNo Drainage facility
HH with no facilityof Garbage disposal
Dev
oli
Chin
chal
a23
27
355
20
41
42
32
64
58
46
113
42
31
141
Dev
oli
Fat
tepur
36
37
16
48
55
75
70
52
94
81
87
539
48
84
212
Dev
oli
Hiw
ra K
awar
e53
62
31
105
35
140
69
147
132
111
133
7110
97
65
278
Dev
oli
Kaj
alsa
ra43
53
11
76
63
29
140
64
128
91
75
835
54
68
247
Dev
oli
Loni
47
57
15
87
70
6149
74
113
114
94
985
47
76
262
Dev
oli
Nag
zari
78
66
30
91
114
47
154
108
131
175
151
970
43
103
347
Dev
oli
Pal
asgao
n35
43
667
61
22
91
35
75
86
64
827
24
27
186
Dev
oli
Pim
pal
gao
n64
89
27
126
143
21
146
84
146
143
152
16
29
106
86
341
Dev
oli
Sen
dar
i20
37
561
24
28
31
66
86
65
73
859
20
18
171
Dev
oli
Soneg
aon
(Aa)
72
77
28
149
47
56
148
98
186
97
103
16
72
64
114
323
Dev
oli
Tal
ni
35
44
14
54
28
46
107
79
62
78
92
627
28
26
191
Dev
oli
Tal
ni
36
35
28
103
35
121
40
69
115
64
77
234
59
57
208
(khan
der
ao)
Dev
oli
Vij
aygopal
143
155
49
222
87
196
349
198
426
198
237
41
186
110
193
712
Dev
oli
Wab
gao
n91
98
26
134
109
58
135
131
193
163
180
773
60
74
411
Dev
oli
Yes
gao
n37
37
218
52
049
25
49
64
55
313
615
127
Hin
gan
ghat
All
ipur
319
360
182
450
195
66
1290
470
837
538
577
126
249
556
727
1747
Hin
gan
ghat
Bhiw
apur
67
59
50
124
990
180
180
152
91
99
23
107
174
139
299
Hin
gan
ghat
Dham
angao
n26
42
44
58
255
156
114
118
76
83
11
70
131
121
227
Hin
gan
ghat
Donduda
71
91
48
109
54
113
198
246
190
131
140
37
151
268
325
420
Hin
gan
ghat
Fukat
a86
107
76
136
119
101
318
282
241
172
206
35
169
294
266
551
(Bhag
wat
)
Blo
ckT
ota
l11
67
1313
387
1840
1344
1101
2504
1694
2747
2182
2231
205
1168
1437
1429
5732
Way Ahead
93
Block
G.P.
Numberofwodows
Females>60 years og age
HH withNo electricity
BPLHH
SC HH
STHH
OBC HH
HHwith No LPG
Landless HH
HH withMarginal farmers
HHwith Dry farm
HHwith No house
HHwith NoTiolet
HH withNo Drainage facility
HH with no facilityof Garbage disposal
Total HH
Hin
gan
ghat
Gad
egao
n33
37
28
32
84
14
55
106
81
50
59
18
60
102
92
168
Hin
gan
ghat
Hiw
ara
46
75
68
131
57
53
142
200
179
79
96
33
88
134
284
332
Hin
gan
ghat
Jam
ani
49
52
68
67
96
69
135
204
178
102
101
29
111
170
170
329
Hin
gan
ghat
Jangona
56
95
92
89
106
62
217
266
170
148
182
28
153
228
188
419
Hin
gan
ghat
Kaj
alsa
ra33
56
28
79
21
29
155
144
117
61
74
11
75
67
26
224
Hin
gan
ghat
Kap
shi
44
59
56
108
87
30
114
138
158
91
110
19
134
163
176
295
Hin
gan
ghat
Khan
gao
n75
95
52
98
109
45
248
268
210
146
185
47
140
284
330
453
Hin
gan
ghat
Pim
pal
gao
n79
102
48
113
93
138
196
220
354
63
87
38
207
285
257
484
Hin
gan
ghat
Pohan
a140
140
94
181
57
50
319
198
353
142
200
47
150
196
389
594
Hin
gan
ghat
Rohan
khed
a27
50
12
39
66
34
88
94
77
50
82
866
93
131
188
Hin
gan
ghat
Sat
efal
68
74
60
145
61
56
294
176
174
124
156
23
114
211
229
420
Hin
gan
ghat
Saw
liW
agh
82
105
94
68
47
38
443
212
263
118
219
43
147
252
198
547
Hin
gan
ghat
Sek
apur
(Bai
)92
123
114
193
45
36
371
264
307
135
164
52
142
392
400
577
Hin
gan
ghat
Sel
u (
bai
)45
67
76
104
30
34
137
250
146
89
118
10
85
239
202
309
Hin
gan
ghat
Shek
apur(
Mo)
83
112
82
112
126
78
220
272
227
143
200
28
145
267
289
484
Hin
gan
ghat
Um
ari
49
67
74
105
48
58
188
196
185
87
148
21
116
214
207
367
Hin
gan
ghat
Ven
i33
43
16
68
36
46
101
144
116
76
84
14
89
110
109
238
Hin
gan
ghat
Wad
ner
242
271
110
376
352
82
682
370
789
307
333
90
316
551
857
1280
Hin
gan
ghat
Wan
i109
100
66
178
66
44
80
182
319
104
139
34
152
208
314
490
Hin
gan
ghat
War
ud
51
56
50
84
888
191
222
125
144
153
24
95
198
183
316
Hin
gan
ghat
Wel
a70
91
62
91
119
44
273
198
288
120
127
44
125
233
294
504
Wardha Development Report
94
Total HH
Hin
gan
ghat
Yen
ora
46
59
38
23
85
36
125
116
133
71
89
13
77
123
132
249
Hin
gan
ghat
Yer
la53
73
38
51
47
38
156
168
163
105
159
17
74
140
149
358
Kar
anja
Bih
adi
54
63
19
12
819
221
125
108
120
113
29
91
80
170
280
Kar
anja
Bondar
Than
a47
69
17
38
10
59
207
223
106
155
114
25
85
120
174
307
Kar
anja
Borg
aon
48
46
18
23
29
14
222
126
147
114
82
20
83
187
200
300
Kar
anja
Dhaw
asa
49
43
18
55
17
18
226
164
113
140
80
30
91
127
191
290
Kar
anja
Ekar
jun
42
61
11
49
13
35
291
149
104
193
163
28
90
78
253
366
Kar
anja
Jasa
pur
33
51
99
19
175
71
70
102
50
348
58
128
210
Kar
anja
Kaj
ali
54
66
15
79
20
68
241
103
219
113
55
28
72
113
254
366
Kar
anja
Kan
nam
war
71
62
23
26
25
106
97
218
274
77
80
29
139
206
259
394
Gra
m
Kar
anja
Khar
askhan
da
28
31
815
29
9112
76
66
73
61
11
52
67
111
167
Kar
anja
Kin
hal
a41
47
855
31
9159
78
86
99
55
828
40
104
212
Kar
anja
Kundi
71
90
25
78
90
72
257
211
225
158
121
18
93
216
253
451
Kar
anja
Par
di
150
164
43
102
106
152
493
396
406
333
278
48
271
249
629
874
Kar
anja
Par
sodi
38
39
11
37
15
23
183
118
135
89
55
12
49
101
150
249
Kar
anja
Saw
al37
54
13
44
26
27
200
182
106
131
81
848
207
146
275
Kar
anja
Saw
li K
h89
112
34
51
42
51
461
259
291
223
148
43
119
262
377
607
Kar
anja
Sel
gao
n52
57
15
50
36
26
175
168
181
105
68
35
79
171
176
325
(Um
ate)
(Dhole
)
Blo
ckT
ota
l2174
2661
1826
3412
2225
1627
7072
5900
6650
3563
4370
923
3607
6283
7184
12869
Block
G.P.
Numberofwodows
Females>60 years og age
HH withNo electricity
BPLHH
SC HH
STHH
OBC HH
HHwith No LPG
Landless HH
HH withMarginal farmers
HHwith Dry farm
HHwith No house
HHwith NoTiolet
HH withNo Drainage facility
HH with no facilityof Garbage disposal
Way Ahead
95
Block
Total HH
Kar
anja
Sel
gao
n35
65
17
82
47
6288
168
144
170
121
16
94
91
177
358
Law
ane
Kar
anja
Um
ari
61
85
17
56
22
15
316
238
158
211
152
30
116
234
334
403
Sam
udra
pur
Dhondgao
n92
109
20
74
72
23
249
124
169
107
152
23
101
138
56
371
Sam
udra
pur
Far
idpur
55
62
12
68
43
172
25
45
110
72
98
10
85
77
11
258
Sam
udra
pur
Hiw
ara
90
106
14
110
76
68
285
102
144
182
204
10
89
358
96
479
Sam
udra
pur
Kar
da
11
14
413
20
13
19
18
23
12
20
69
28
17
53
Sam
udra
pur
Khan
dal
a35
41
860
40
45
108
34
83
70
77
416
112
65
199
Sam
udra
pur
Las
anpur
60
74
38
88
45
39
266
69
128
145
182
11
104
312
38
397
Sam
udra
pur
Nan
dori
134
130
50
111
183
98
335
118
469
119
154
59
211
201
85
706
Sam
udra
pur
Nir
gudi
30
43
10
49
455
129
81
94
56
71
457
141
47
196
Sam
udra
pur
Saw
angi(
Zad
e)64
83
39
106
52
52
262
87
177
94
115
33
106
171
22
372
Sam
udra
pur
Sew
a30
39
15
42
13
60
32
52
60
65
78
530
146
61
161
Sam
udra
pur
Tas
62
71
33
87
59
17
241
82
135
104
99
19
75
203
113
336
Sam
udra
pur
Ubda
34
49
16
54
62
51
80
64
172
58
66
14
98
108
88
276
Sam
udra
pur
Wad
gao
n83
100
29
129
108
35
295
108
159
188
150
17
113
299
53
471
Sam
udra
pur
Wai
gao
n82
88
19
66
43
33
219
65
78
142
179
649
269
80
328
Sam
udra
pur
Was
hi
109
107
18
63
141
19
334
65
232
153
183
31
186
228
61
511
Sel
oo
Akoli
95
109
90
144
55
18
280
258
347
163
111
26
277
384
342
579
(Gond)
Blo
ckT
ota
l1000
1205
321
861
567
718
4324
3073
2939
2606
1877
421
1648
2607
4086
6434
Blo
ckT
ota
l971
1116
325
1120
961
780
2879
1114
2233
1567
1828
252
1329
2791
893
511
4
G.P.
Numberofwodows
Females>60 years og age
HH withNo electricity
BPLHH
SC HH
STHH
OBC HH
HHwith No LPG
Landless HH
HH withMarginal farmers
HHwith Dry farm
HHwith No house
HHwith NoTiolet
HH withNo Drainage facility
HH with no facilityof Garbage disposal
Wardha Development Report
96
Block
Total HH
Sel
oo
Deu
lgao
n65
67
31
54
97
28
194
86
201
109
99
10
90
309
249
364
Sel
oo
Juw
adi
50
53
19
65
58
118
79
89
160
101
51
10
92
183
165
282
Sel
oo
Din
doda
44
70
14
43
56
43
134
65
107
120
115
554
182
173
252
Sel
oo
Hel
odi
65
70
28
22
85
75
152
77
178
108
82
14
43
178
188
320
Sel
oo
Jaypur
31
58
99
74
44
77
55
159
79
68
935
162
184
260
Sel
oo
Khad
aki
68
67
22
45
32
122
93
61
215
83
71
21
46
189
198
333
Sel
oo
Kopar
a59
69
19
22
25
24
185
55
132
100
108
11
50
152
182
265
Sel
oo
Sal
ai(K
ala)
42
64
16
67
11
73
76
28
99
72
61
12
45
141
143
194
Sel
oo
Sal
ai(P
evat
h)
53
51
643
13
74
108
43
117
77
55
645
157
169
216
Sel
oo
Sal
doh
78
86
21
16
21
99
190
83
248
91
69
18
70
156
239
381
Sel
oo
Sukal
i(S
tati
on)
75
73
16
84
82
78
155
73
207
86
78
862
182
228
341
Sel
oo
Tak
ali(
Kit
e)19
36
844
58
46
21
45
77
51
52
10
25
85
107
143
Sel
oo
Wad
gao
n47
73
871
25
16
218
39
132
118
62
426
142
128
282
Khurd
Sel
oo
Wad
gao
n53
50
12
758
52
116
35
104
97
53
336
121
141
230
(Jan
gli
)
Sel
oo
Wag
hal
a66
84
16
54
56
57
178
62
145
118
119
863
180
193
316
Sel
oo
Zad
shi
96
135
28
147
32
56
333
79
271
156
100
17
78
232
303
481
War
dha
Anji
(Moti
)298
331
45
201
157
110
725
234
996
254
224
85
296
245
515
1380
War
dha
Bhiv
apur
35
50
370
10
18
139
49
74
69
48
746
14
26
183
War
dha
Bodad
29
52
633
57
21
104
42
142
65
48
12
33
40
72
226
Blo
ckT
ota
l1006
1215
363
937
838
1023
2589
1233
2899
1729
1354
192
1137
3135
3332
5239
G.P.
Numberofwodows
Females>60 years og age
HH withNo electricity
BPLHH
SC HH
STHH
OBC HH
HHwith No LPG
Landless HH
HH withMarginal farmers
HHwith Dry farm
HHwith No house
HHwith NoTiolet
HH withNo Drainage facility
HH with no facilityof Garbage disposal
Way Ahead
97
Total HH
Block
G.P.
Numberofwodows
Females>60 years og age
HH withNo electricity
BPLHH
SC HH
STHH
OBC HH
HHwith No LPG
Landless HH
HH withMarginal farmers
HHwith Dry farm
HHwith No house
HHwith NoTiolet
HH withNo Drainage facility
HH with no facilityof Garbage disposal
War
dha
Dah
egao
n77
84
20
40
99
14
188
97
168
152
113
17
75
130
71
355
Mis
kin
War
dha
Dham
angao
n46
49
30
58
45
39
79
89
132
91
77
12
51
51
68
262
War
dha
Dhotr
a(S
te)
51
62
11
57
51
62
42
48
100
75
64
550
55
51
192
War
dha
Gan
eshpur
55
53
24
52
15
64
132
76
130
72
53
22
40
108
84
229
War
dha
Inza
pur
53
60
443
14
26
251
58
273
39
36
33
60
142
129
346
War
dha
Kel
apur
49
53
15
70
64
72
60
46
95
98
76
15
40
88
73
224
War
dha
Lonsa
wal
i81
96
18
98
99
103
73
102
160
113
98
979
145
24
329
War
dha
Nim
gao
n40
39
924
13
69
72
50
91
69
65
533
53
66
176
War
dha
Pal
oti
85
97
25
51
105
94
194
87
277
87
70
18
62
75
139
409
War
dha
Pet
h44
59
822
21
29
138
46
99
81
63
10
28
27
55
207
War
dha
Sal
od(H
isap
ur)
256
290
47
158
110
174
870
186
934
346
308
56
198
371
543
1400
War
dha
Sat
oda
132
127
17
44
108
67
352
67
503
78
65
49
67
226
348
617
War
dha
Sel
ukat
e98
134
29
114
105
55
248
111
302
102
89
33
64
106
170
454
War
dha
Tal
egao
n(T
a)182
238
23
109
98
17
687
115
468
325
155
51
226
182
253
969
War
dha
Tig
aon
47
58
14
84
110
37
49
67
126
79
75
12
45
44
37
223
War
dha
Um
ari(
Meg
he)
119
132
47
118
75
61
444
127
597
94
100
29
196
306
457
746
War
dha
Wad
adh
66
63
11
830
69
145
92
131
115
94
555
62
39
286
War
dha
Wai
gao
n366
393
78
277
278
107
1155
259
1174
410
336
111
465
539
863
1830
(Nip
ani)
Blo
ckT
ota
l2209
2520
484
1731
1664
1308
6147
2048
6972
2814
2257
596
2209
3009
4083
11043
Dis
tric
tT
ota
l10302
12278
4510
13123
8953
9009
29229
19830
30063
17980
17214
2964
13931
21753
24998
56705
Wardha Development Report
98
Appendix
Appendix 1: Tables
Table 1: Number of villages block wise
Sr.No.
Name block
Total numberof inhabitedvillages inthe block
Totalpopulation
of block
1 Ashti 84 76276
2 Karanja 95 90462
3 Arvi 146 103159
4 Seloo 133 116789
5 Wardha 107 144874
6 Deoli 104 106664
7 Hinganghat 138 122212
8 Samudrapur 166 117038
Total 973 877474
Source: Census 2011
Table 2: Number of villages, block wise (in sample)
Sr.No.
BlockNumber of
GrampapnchayatNumber ofHouseholds
1 Arvi 19 31 5498
2 Ashti 13 25 4776
3 Deoli 21 31 5732
4 Hinganghat 28 45 12869
5 Karanja 18 27 6113
6 Samudrapur 15 34 5114
7 Seloo 17 30 5239
8 Wardha 21 27 11043
Total 152 250 56384
Source: Primary Survey by YASHADA, 2017
Number ofvillages
Appendix 1
101
Wardha Development Report
102
2017
Appendix 2
103
Wardha Development Report
104
Appendix 2
105
Wardha Development Report
106
Appendix 2
107
Wardha Development Report
108
Appendix 2
109
Wardha Development Report
110
Appendix 2
111
Wardha Development Report
112
Appendix 2
113
Wardha Development Report
114
Appendix 2
115
Wardha Development Report
116
Appendix 2
117
Appendix 3
List of Data Investigators
1. Shri Asit Mate Arvi
2. Shri Atul Naubde Asti
3. Shri Satwaji Wanole Deoli
4. Shri Ashok Suryawanshi Hinganghat
5. Shri Rahul Lakhe Karanja
6. Shri Bhushan Suryawanshi Samudrapur
7. Shri Chetan Bele Seloo
8. Smt. Jaya Yadhav Wardha
Block wise list of the Coordinator
Sr.No.
Name of the Coordinator Name of the Block
Block wise list of the Data Investigators
Sr.No.
Name of the Investigaor Name of the Block
1 Dharati Nakhale
2 Navin Gedam
3 Lokesh Pohekar
4 Ravina Sonone
5 Sagar Bhakhare
6 Sagar Dajbhiye
7 Samyek Manwar
8 Saurabh Kalpande
9 Saruj Meshram
10 Ashish Madghe
11 Harshal Misale
12 Minakshee Madghe
13 Rinku Bramhan
Arvi
Ashti
Wardha Development Report
118
Appendix 3
119
Sr.No.
Name of the Investigaor Name of the Block
1 Dharati Nakhale
2 Navin Gedam
3 Lokesh Pohekar
4 Ravina Sonone
5 Sagar Bhakhare
6 Sagar Dajbhiye
7 Samyek Manwar
8 Saurabh Kalpande
9 Saruj Meshram
10 Ashish Madghe
11 Harshal Misale
12 Minakshee Madghe
13 Rinku Bramhane
14 Reshmi Buradkar
15 Sonali Shende
16 Suraj Lakhe
17 Amardeep Bharne
18 Arti Jambhulkar
19 Raksha Gharder
20 Kalidas Kashid
21 Sonu Marmate
22 Monali Tarale
23 Nilesh Khadase
24 Priti Patil
25 Pooja Ladekar
26 Premkumar Naik
27 Punam Fulmali
28 Raunak Jambhulkar
29 Sima Janghar
30 Vaishali Nimsadkar
Arvi
Ashti
Deoli
Deoli
Sr.No.
Name of the Investigaor Name of the Block
1 Dharati Nakhale
2 Navin Gedam
3 Lokesh Pohekar
4 Ravina Sonone
5 Sagar Bhakhare
6 Sagar Dajbhiye
7 Samyek Manwar
8 Saurabh Kalpande
9 Saruj Meshram
10 Ashish Madghe
11 Harshal Misale
12 Minakshee Madghe
13 Rinku Bramhane
14 Reshmi Buradkar
15 Sonali Shende
16 Suraj Lakhe
17 Amardeep Bharne
18 Arti Jambhulkar
19 Raksha Gharder
20 Kalidas Kashid
21 Sonu Marmate
22 Monali Tarale
23 Nilesh Khadase
24 Priti Patil
25 Pooja Ladekar
26 Premkumar Naik
27 Punam Fulmali
28 Raunak Jambhulkar
29 Sima Janghar
30 Vaishali Nimsadkar
Arvi
Ashti
Deoli
Deoli
Wardha Development Report
120
Appendix 3
121
Sr.No.
Name of the Investigaor Name of the Block
31 Munju Nandeshwar
32 Anand Buche
33 Shubhangi Salem
34 Bandu Khaire
35 Sonu Choudhari
36 Kishor Shambharkar
37 Kishor Tayade
38 Kapil Bhoyar
39 Naresh Kahale
40 Pradnya Bhagat
41 Prakash Ueke
42 Pritam Borkar
43 Pritam Hadke
44 Priya Anagrale
45 Shibhangi Shambharkar
46 Rameshwar Agase
47 Sameer Patil
48 Sameir Nikhare
49 Suraj Thool
50 Bharat Ubhad
51 Vicky Ghuse
52 Avinash Dahiwade
53 Gajanan Chopade
54 Priya Kawashi
55 Mayuri Deshmukh
56 Payal Balpande
57 Prashant Dhobale
58 Sanket Balpande
59 Sanjay Tupkar
60 Ujjwala Chopade
Hinganghat
Kajanja
Sr.No.
Name of the Investigaor Name of the Block
61 Yogesh Chopade
62 Kalpana Mundre
63 Sagar Karale
64 Mukul Bhaisare
65 Nikhil Timande
66 Pranali Dhabarade
67 Prajali Yenurkar
68 Vaibhav Rothe
69 Kalpana Satav
70 Pravin Wanjari
71 Sachin Watgule
72 Sanjay Gulghane
73 Sapna Nikose
74 Ashwini Satone
75 Shailesh Dhavane
76 Suhas Moharle
77 Kanchan Wanjari
78 Ankush Parteti
79 Bhushan Chaudhary
80 Shubham Dhongade
81 Rashika Alone
82 Kiran Khadse
83 Megha Wandile
84 Monali Bhingare
85 Praful Bele
86 Priya Mali
87 Rahul Raut
88 Rakesh Bhitre
89 Roshan Bele
90 Chandrakant Bavankule
Samudrapur
Seloo
Wardha
Wardha Development Report
122
Appendix 3
123
Sr.No.
Name of the Investigaor Name of the Block
91 Sujata Thool
92 Sumedh Nagarale
93 Swapnil Meshram
94 Vinita Tambiya
95 Ranjit Yadhav
Wardha
Appendix 4: List of FPOs from which data was collected
Sr.No. Name and address of FPO
1 Kejaji Farmer Producer Company Ltd,
Ghorad, Tq – Seloo Dist – Wardha
2 Agri care farmer producer company Ltd
Naga, Tq-Karanja Gh, Dist – Wardha
3 Shri Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj shetkari producer company Ltd,
Sahur Tq – Ashti Dist – Wardha
4 Aagargaon Agri Farmer producer company Ltd,
Aagargaon Tq- Deoli Dist – Wardha
5 Vijaygopal Agro Kisan Producer Company Ltd,
Vijaygopal Tq- Deoli Dist – Wardha
6 Shramjivi Shetkari producer company Ltd,
Sawali Wagh, Tq- Higanghat Dist - Wardha
7 Gramnath Farmer producer company Ltd,
Nandori, Tq – Samudrapur Dist – Wardha
8 Vidarbha naisargik shetmaal utpadak kisan producer company Ltd,
Girad Tq –Samudrapur Dist –Wardha
9 Gramonati Farmer Producer Co. Ltd,
Higni Tq – Seloo Dist – Wardha
10 Hinganghat Taluka Farmer producer company Ltd
Hinganghat Dist – Wardha
11 Karnja Gh Taluka Farmer producer company Ltd
Karanja Dist – Wardha
12 Yashaswi Farmer Producer Company Ltd
Karanja Dist – Wardha
13 Bandhan Agro Farmer Producer Company Ltd
Karanja Dist – Wardha
14 Waigaon Halad producer company Ltd
Samudrapur Dist – Wardha
15 Sanskar Agro Farmer Producer Company Ltd
Vijaygopal, Tq-Deoli, Dist – Wardha
16 Wardha soya and cotton Agro Farmer Producer Company Ltd
Deoli, Dist – Wardha
17 Naisargik Bij sheti Producer Company Ltd
Dorli Tq and Dist – Wardha
18 Jidhyasa Producer Co. Ltd
Arvi Dist – Wardha
Wardha Development Report
124
Appendix 5
125
SN
.B
lock
GP
% of HH withown land
% of HHwith irrigated land
% of HH doingsupplementary occupation
% of working pop
MYS (Years)
SLE (Years)
% of non-addictedpopulation
% of HH with SHGmember
% of persons (>6) % ofwith bank accounts
% of HH with electricity
% of HH with LPG
% of Owned HH
% of HH with DW
% of HH with Usingtoilets
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Drainage
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Garbage disposal
1B
edho
na55
.00%
7.70
%29
.20%
71.3
1%5.
711
.91
80.2
0%31
.00%
80.6
1%94
.30%
39.8
7%97
.47%
60.7
6%96
.46%
51.9
0%28
.50%
43.0
0%
2A
rvi
Bel
hara
57.1
4%27
.27%
12.6
4%78
.00%
6.1
12.0
078
.00%
19.4
8%77
.34%
96.1
0%38
.96%
96.7
5%66
.88%
96.5
8%70
.78%
22.7
3%38
.76%
3A
rvi
Bha
dod
56.9
2%15
.00%
46.1
2%82
.53%
6.1
12.0
074
.46%
71.9
5%83
.08%
94.7
6%35
.41%
99.6
4%83
.65%
97.4
1%71
.54%
27.1
0%39
.00%
4A
rvi
Bod
ad39
.73%
14.7
5%1.
64%
75.3
8%6.
5312
.00
77.8
7%24
.66%
89.4
9%93
.84%
52.7
4%96
.58%
53.4
2%64
.38%
71.2
3%53
.42%
58.2
2%
5A
rvi
Bor
gaon
44.1
2%11
.96%
6.52
%73
.80%
6.34
12.0
082
.57%
48.0
4%81
.32%
90.6
9%44
.61%
96.0
8%44
.12%
60.2
9%70
.10%
54.9
0%70
.10%
6A
rvi
Dah
egao
n (G
ondi
)35
.42%
21.4
8%11
.45%
74.0
1%6.
212
.00
80.9
4%30
.79%
86.0
4%95
.10%
60.4
9%97
.00%
79.8
4%65
.12%
76.8
4%69
.48%
38.9
6%
7A
rvi
Dah
egao
n M
usta
fa47
.61%
19.1
2%10
.78%
75.9
1%4.
4611
.96
79.4
4%21
.29%
78.3
1%95
.22%
51.2
0%97
.85%
70.1
0%67
.94%
66.9
9%31
.58%
41.1
5%
8A
rvi
Deu
rwad
a37
.75%
12.3
2%7.
46%
67.9
9%7.
0911
.91
84.9
0%23
.92%
79.3
8%95
.68%
62.8
2%97
.12%
92.2
2%79
.54%
74.6
4%59
.94%
51.5
9%
9A
rvi
Kaw
adi
33.9
7%20
.27%
6.76
%80
.15%
5.2
11.8
572
.60%
30.6
2%65
.70%
74.6
4%34
.45%
97.1
3%76
.56%
57.8
9%52
.63%
32.5
4%30
.62%
10A
rvi
Mal
egao
nT
heka
36.7
6%7.
59%
24.6
8%72
.20%
6.44
12.0
077
.85%
17.1
6%79
.77%
92.1
6%87
.75%
98.5
3%79
.90%
73.5
3%60
.78%
59.3
1%26
.47%
11A
rvi
Mor
anga
na20
.75%
11.0
2%20
.33%
72.6
8%6.
2212
.00
80.7
3%24
.19%
80.5
8%93
.14%
58.8
3%93
.48%
77.7
0%60
.03%
77.7
0%53
.34%
32.2
5%
12A
rvi
Pan
jara
Bot
hali
31.8
8%14
.49%
10.3
7%82
.24%
6.68
11.9
079
.67%
30.9
2%75
.43%
83.3
3%50
.97%
96.1
4%76
.57%
66.6
7%61
.59%
44.9
3%32
.85%
13A
rvi
Par
sodi
(Tem
bhar
i)45
.26%
11.4
9%11
.90%
71.7
0%6.
2512
.00
81.1
5%46
.84%
86.3
2%92
.11%
60.5
3%97
.37%
77.8
9%71
.58%
57.8
9%61
.58%
35.7
9%
14A
rvi
Roh
ana
28.7
4%13
.53%
9.58
%67
.83%
711
.95
82.6
8%23
.64%
87.0
0%92
.82%
70.6
8%95
.13%
69.2
9%69
.41%
75.3
2%45
.19%
54.2
3%
15A
rvi
Sal
dara
33.7
5%14
.55%
13.7
6%83
.18%
4.45
12.0
079
.01%
13.6
2%78
.66%
85.4
5%18
.89%
96.5
9%48
.92%
53.8
7%58
.20%
77.0
9%26
.63%
16A
rvi
Sal
fal
32.2
7%13
.70%
12.8
6%77
.21%
5.78
12.0
079
.07%
31.3
6%84
.49%
91.8
2%55
.00%
95.9
1%58
.64%
55.0
0%53
.64%
50.4
5%42
.27%
17A
rvi
Saw
angi
38.1
4%8.
70%
13.0
4%78
.39%
4.77
12.0
076
.64%
21.1
9%75
.18%
88.1
4%31
.36%
97.4
6%68
.64%
63.5
6%58
.47%
27.1
2%41
.53%
18A
rvi
Sor
ta32
.11%
11.7
1%10
.28%
70.1
3%7.
0812
.00
81.3
6%56
.88%
88.7
6%93
.58%
69.7
2%96
.02%
70.3
4%74
.31%
92.9
7%80
.43%
58.4
1%
19A
rvi
Um
ari(S
ukal
i)48
.00%
18.8
7%9.
62%
80.1
6%5.
5211
.88
73.8
7%22
.00%
81.2
7%90
.00%
50.0
0%95
.00%
72.0
0%85
.00%
74.0
0%26
.00%
42.0
0%
20A
shti
Bam
bard
a48
.97%
5.30
%25
.76%
73.8
2%4.
9512
80.9
4%32
.92%
80.7
4%95
.47%
41.1
5%96
.71%
53.0
9%53
.50%
74.4
9%88
.48%
23.8
7%
21A
shti
Bhi
shnu
r61
.67%
2.08
%9.
90%
74.6
5%6.
2212
87.4
3%15
.00%
73.8
1%95
.33%
46.0
0%97
.67%
79.0
0%59
.67%
88.3
3%80
.33%
24.3
3%
22A
shti
Dru
gwad
a38
.13%
16.5
0%11
.65%
73.2
4%6.
111
.94
81.0
5%41
.25%
75.6
9%95
.15%
69.9
0%10
0.00
%94
.94%
66.0
0%75
.10%
70.0
4%66
.00%
23A
shti
Laha
nA
rvi
60.9
9%32
.70%
8.81
%64
.89%
7.52
11.9
688
.95%
34.6
5%78
.86%
95.4
5%67
.72%
94.8
5%81
.78%
80.4
0%93
.07%
78.6
1%35
.45%
24A
shti
Nav
inA
shti
42.4
5%23
.19%
8.70
%49
.62%
9.5
1291
.73%
32.3
9%78
.22%
97.8
0%83
.96%
79.8
7%83
.02%
86.7
9%94
.03%
75.1
6%73
.27%
25A
shti
Pan
dhur
na53
.29%
7.57
%5.
59%
79.8
5%4.
8612
79.5
5%50
.90%
78.7
1%88
.42%
33.7
3%94
.41%
53.0
9%51
.50%
72.2
6%60
.88%
22.0
0%
26A
shti
Par
soda
51.5
6%11
.48%
4.10
%67
.06%
6.74
1284
.87%
44.8
9%76
.96%
97.7
8%72
.00%
98.2
2%84
.89%
83.5
6%88
.00%
67.1
1%38
.67%
Arv
i
% of Pacca house
Ap
pen
dix
5:
Gra
m P
an
chayat
an
d v
alu
es o
f th
e in
dic
ato
rs
% of HH withown land
% of HHwith irrigated land
% of HH doingsupplementary occupation
% of working pop
MYS (Years)
SLE (Years)
% of non-addictedpopulation
% of HH with SHGmember
% of persons (>6) % ofwith bank accounts
% of HH with electricity
% of HH with LPG
% of Owned HH
% of HH with DW
% of HH with Usingtoilets
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Drainage
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Garbage disposal
27A
shti
Pila
pur
31.2
5%22
.00%
8.00
%79
.82%
4.97
1292
.18%
3.13
%79
.55%
93.7
5%28
.13%
97.5
0%90
.63%
71.2
5%50
.63%
93.7
5%20
.63%
28A
shti
Ran
wad
i46
.56%
16.3
3%10
.88%
71.7
2%6.
4612
85.2
9%48
.85%
78.3
7%95
.74%
52.7
9%97
.05%
84.9
2%60
.98%
76.3
9%69
.84%
30.8
2%
29A
shti
Sah
ur41
.20%
18.6
0%14
.05%
71.1
9%6.
6411
.96
82.1
9%31
.53%
83.3
6%93
.81%
64.6
0%93
.81%
77.7
6%63
.44%
94.3
9%79
.69%
38.6
8%
30A
shti
Tara
saw
anga
63.0
6%31
.45%
2.37
%71
.24%
6.26
1282
.35%
38.1
6%79
.56%
89.5
9%50
.00%
94.9
0%70
.82%
77.7
6%79
.18%
45.3
1%31
.63%
31A
shti
Tha
r43
.73%
13.0
0%13
.62%
75.8
8%5.
2211
.980
.99%
41.3
2%84
.95%
89.3
9%34
.24%
94.6
9%41
.80%
67.8
5%80
.23%
79.1
0%25
.72%
32A
shti
Wad
ala
50.1
5%31
.11%
10.5
6%72
.96%
5.39
1281
.37%
29.1
3%87
.33%
93.9
9%45
.65%
96.7
0%81
.38%
66.3
7%92
.49%
85.5
9%28
.53%
33D
evol
iA
garg
aon
52.7
4%7.
53%
10.0
4%76
.31%
6.77
11.9
080
.50%
62.3
3%78
.32%
92.6
9%67
.12%
96.3
5%71
.00%
83.5
6%74
.20%
74.8
9%42
.01%
34D
evol
iA
mbo
da63
.33%
0.00
%7.
32%
84.7
8%6.
2812
.00
83.6
2%58
.33%
64.2
2%93
.33%
83.3
3%10
0.00
%83
.33%
78.3
3%31
.67%
75.0
0%45
.00%
35D
evol
iB
abul
gaon
44.2
3%5.
21%
3.13
%76
.50%
5.38
12.0
079
.34%
66.8
3%85
.96%
89.4
2%46
.63%
93.2
7%94
.71%
68.2
7%51
.92%
74.5
2%45
.19%
36D
evol
iB
opap
ur48
.31%
5.83
%0.
97%
79.4
6%6.
2212
.00
74.7
9%69
.57%
86.4
3%96
.62%
82.6
1%98
.07%
88.4
1%82
.13%
73.4
3%78
.26%
76.3
3%
37D
evol
iB
orga
onA
loda
48.7
0%5.
19%
3.90
%75
.48%
6.46
12.0
076
.06%
65.2
2%83
.07%
94.5
7%83
.48%
95.0
0%85
.43%
81.0
9%38
.26%
68.9
1%58
.26%
38D
evol
iC
hikh
ali
58.4
2%6.
78%
0.00
%83
.08%
6.28
11.9
671
.22%
61.3
9%77
.97%
97.0
3%72
.77%
97.0
3%82
.18%
75.2
5%82
.18%
87.1
3%63
.37%
39D
evol
iC
hinc
hala
53.9
0%3.
90%
2.60
%76
.32%
6.2
12.0
073
.64%
62.4
1%82
.24%
97.8
7%77
.30%
98.5
8%91
.49%
90.7
8%70
.21%
78.0
1%53
.90%
40D
evol
iF
atte
pur
55.6
6%8.
47%
5.93
%77
.94%
6.57
12.0
080
.03%
74.5
3%85
.03%
92.4
5%75
.47%
96.7
0%84
.43%
81.1
3%77
.36%
60.3
8%72
.17%
41D
evol
iH
iwra
Kaw
are
51.4
4%2.
05%
3.42
%75
.33%
5.24
12.0
071
.80%
97.4
8%80
.72%
88.8
5%47
.12%
97.4
8%84
.53%
58.2
7%65
.11%
76.6
2%52
.88%
42D
evol
iK
ajal
sara
46.5
6%11
.76%
6.72
%73
.69%
6.32
12.0
074
.67%
57.0
9%82
.11%
95.5
5%74
.09%
96.7
6%79
.76%
85.0
2%78
.14%
72.4
7%65
.99%
43D
evol
iLo
ni56
.87%
16.7
8%17
.45%
75.3
6%5.
9411
.97
72.6
8%72
.90%
87.7
3%94
.27%
71.7
6%96
.18%
95.0
4%66
.03%
82.0
6%70
.99%
53.8
2%
44D
evol
iN
agza
ri60
.52%
15.2
8%12
.04%
73.0
5%6.
6212
.00
72.9
8%61
.96%
78.8
6%91
.35%
68.8
8%96
.83%
98.8
5%78
.39%
87.6
1%70
.32%
42.6
5%
45D
evol
iP
alas
gaon
56.4
5%19
.82%
11.7
1%70
.02%
7.36
12.0
079
.61%
62.9
0%85
.10%
96.7
7%81
.18%
94.6
2%97
.31%
84.9
5%87
.10%
85.4
8%63
.44%
46D
evol
iP
impa
lgao
n55
.13%
9.74
%5.
64%
73.2
5%6.
7711
.85
78.2
7%68
.62%
80.4
7%92
.08%
75.3
7%95
.01%
86.5
1%90
.62%
68.9
1%74
.78%
59.8
2%
47D
evol
iS
enda
ri48
.54%
3.53
%8.
24%
78.8
9%6.
3612
.00
77.4
4%40
.35%
75.0
5%97
.08%
61.4
0%95
.32%
78.3
6%64
.91%
88.3
0%89
.47%
61.9
9%
48D
evol
iS
oneg
aon
(AA
)41
.18%
5.84
%6.
57%
77.8
6%6.
212
.00
80.0
5%59
.75%
76.0
5%91
.33%
69.6
6%94
.43%
81.7
3%76
.78%
80.1
9%64
.71%
51.7
0%
49D
evol
iTa
lni (
Bha
gwat
)65
.97%
14.7
3%10
.85%
77.0
5%5.
7612
.00
70.9
9%74
.35%
79.0
5%92
.67%
58.6
4%96
.34%
92.1
5%84
.82%
85.3
4%86
.39%
56.0
2%
50D
evol
iTa
lni (
Kha
nder
ao)
43.2
7%11
.83%
3.23
%75
.88%
5.48
12.0
071
.91%
59.6
2%82
.61%
86.5
4%66
.83%
99.0
4%88
.46%
81.2
5%71
.63%
72.6
0%52
.88%
51D
evol
iV
ijayg
opal
39.6
1%3.
85%
9.09
%70
.45%
6.23
12.0
079
.55%
57.0
2%87
.12%
93.1
2%72
.19%
93.1
2%71
.63%
67.2
8%84
.55%
72.8
9%56
.04%
52D
evol
iW
abga
on52
.31%
10.5
5%5.
50%
74.6
2%6.
612
.00
80.3
8%72
.26%
83.8
8%93
.67%
68.1
3%98
.05%
88.8
1%81
.75%
85.4
0%82
.00%
55.7
2%
53D
evol
iY
esga
on59
.84%
12.8
2%6.
41%
68.9
3%6.
4712
.00
69.3
5%68
.50%
85.9
5%98
.43%
80.3
1%97
.64%
92.1
3%89
.76%
95.2
8%88
.19%
61.4
2%
54H
inga
ngha
tA
llipu
r47
.85%
19.8
9%11
.76%
72.4
5%6.
7653
8811
.95
79.9
4%11
.39%
71.1
9%94
.79%
86.5
5%90
.15%
78.1
9%84
.09%
68.2
0%58
.39%
61.5
3%% of Pacca house
SN
.B
lock
GP
Wardha Development Report
126
Appendix 5
127
% of HH withown land
% of HHwith irrigated land
% of HH doingsupplementary occupation
% of working pop
MYS (Years)
SLE (Years)
% of non-addictedpopulation
% of HH with SHGmember
% of persons (>6) % ofwith bank accounts
% of HH with electricity
% of HH with LPG
% of Owned HH
% of HH with DW
% of HH with Usingtoilets
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Drainage
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Garbage disposal
55H
inga
ngha
tB
hiw
apur
47.1
6%10
.88%
6.76
%77
.22%
5.98
12.0
072
.32%
20.7
4%76
.36%
91.6
4%69
.90%
91.9
7%66
.56%
62.2
1%41
.80%
53.5
0%54
.85%
56H
inga
ngha
tD
ham
anga
on44
.05%
22.0
2%20
.18%
78.3
7%5.
2711
.94
78.3
0%22
.91%
70.2
8%90
.31%
74.8
9%94
.27%
71.8
1%67
.84%
42.2
9%46
.70%
59.4
7%
57H
inga
ngha
tD
ondu
da47
.14%
18.2
6%7.
83%
78.3
2%5.
812
.00
74.2
0%26
.19%
80.2
2%94
.29%
70.7
0%91
.00%
63.3
3%62
.14%
36.1
9%22
.62%
50.7
1%
58H
inga
ngha
tF
ukat
a52
.09%
14.1
9%6.
13%
75.6
0%6.
3411
.95
78.7
6%31
.58%
75.3
9%93
.10%
74.4
1%91
.83%
66.4
2%68
.06%
46.6
4%51
.72%
54.9
9%
59H
inga
ngha
tG
adeg
aon
50.6
0%18
.39%
5.75
%74
.70%
6.13
12.0
076
.24%
21.4
3%76
.63%
91.6
7%68
.45%
87.5
0%73
.81%
61.3
1%39
.29%
45.2
4%45
.83%
60H
inga
ngha
tH
iwar
a41
.57%
17.6
5%8.
50%
78.7
0%5.
9311
.95
76.3
5%7.
53%
70.7
0%89
.76%
69.8
8%88
.86%
78.6
1%69
.58%
59.6
4%14
.46%
47.2
9%
61H
inga
ngha
tJa
man
i43
.77%
23.1
8%7.
95%
78.8
0%6.
0912
.00
76.1
3%35
.87%
72.7
5%89
.67%
69.0
0%90
.27%
61.7
0%62
.61%
48.3
3%48
.33%
51.3
7%
62H
inga
ngha
tJa
ngon
a57
.04%
18.8
8%6.
02%
75.8
0%6.
2511
.93
80.2
7%7.
40%
70.9
7%89
.02%
68.2
6%91
.89%
65.1
6%11
.93%
45.5
8%55
.13%
59.6
7%
63H
inga
ngha
tK
ajal
sara
43.3
0%3.
74%
13.0
8%75
.60%
6.45
12.0
073
.94%
9.38
%81
.44%
93.7
5%67
.86%
93.3
0%86
.61%
64.2
9%70
.09%
88.3
9%41
.52%
64H
inga
ngha
tK
apsh
i42
.37%
10.9
5%13
.87%
75.9
6%6.
3512
.00
80.0
9%13
.56%
75.3
0%90
.51%
76.6
1%93
.22%
68.4
7%51
.53%
44.7
5%40
.34%
58.3
1%
65H
inga
ngha
tK
hang
aon
47.6
8%12
.76%
14.4
0%74
.62%
6.64
12.0
074
.74%
32.6
7%77
.64%
94.2
6%70
.42%
89.1
8%62
.25%
67.9
9%37
.31%
27.1
5%43
.71%
66H
inga
ngha
tP
impa
lgao
n20
.45%
15.3
8%6.
92%
77.1
0%5.
9611
.96
73.4
4%44
.01%
77.8
9%95
.04%
77.2
7%90
.70%
73.5
5%55
.99%
41.1
2%46
.90%
53.9
3%
67H
inga
ngha
tP
ohan
a37
.04%
10.7
9%9.
54%
76.7
0%6.
5712
.00
81.1
3%26
.77%
72.1
3%92
.09%
83.3
3%90
.07%
75.4
2%72
.56%
67.0
0%34
.51%
37.5
4%
68H
inga
ngha
tR
ohan
khed
a44
.15%
10.8
1%3.
60%
74.5
0%6.
912
.00
74.0
7%30
.85%
79.5
5%96
.81%
75.0
0%93
.09%
76.0
6%64
.36%
50.5
3%30
.32%
57.4
5%
69H
inga
ngha
tS
atef
al47
.62%
15.8
5%10
.16%
77.9
1%6.
5512
.00
68.4
4%9.
29%
79.9
8%92
.86%
79.0
5%93
.81%
62.8
6%70
.71%
49.7
6%45
.48%
56.6
7%
70H
inga
ngha
tS
awli
Wag
h43
.14%
14.4
4%8.
45%
76.4
0%6.
4911
.94
75.3
3%26
.69%
72.5
0%91
.41%
80.6
2%89
.76%
72.2
1%71
.30%
53.9
3%63
.80%
55.9
4%
71H
inga
ngha
tS
ekap
ur (
Bai
)41
.59%
22.9
6%10
.37%
77.9
0%5.
9912
.00
77.2
7%22
.70%
65.6
1%90
.12%
77.1
2%89
.60%
60.6
6%72
.62%
32.0
6%30
.68%
50.2
6%
72H
inga
ngha
tS
elu
(bai
)47
.25%
13.5
0%4.
91%
78.4
0%5.
3611
.94
79.9
0%7.
77%
61.1
7%87
.70%
59.5
5%96
.44%
67.3
1%69
.90%
22.6
5%34
.63%
38.5
1%
73H
inga
ngha
tS
heka
pur(
Mo)
44.6
3%10
.51%
10.5
1%76
.90%
6.32
12.0
076
.47%
41.3
2%76
.92%
91.5
3%71
.90%
92.5
6%61
.36%
67.3
6%44
.83%
40.2
9%43
.60%
74H
inga
ngha
tU
mar
i39
.24%
12.0
9%11
.54%
76.4
0%5.
3912
.00
71.8
0%44
.41%
75.6
3%89
.92%
73.3
0%93
.73%
61.8
5%66
.21%
41.6
9%43
.60%
58.8
6%
75H
inga
ngha
tV
eni
45.8
0%16
.39%
3.28
%76
.70%
6.29
12.0
079
.05%
24.7
9%80
.00%
96.6
4%69
.75%
94.1
2%85
.29%
60.5
0%53
.78%
54.2
0%54
.62%
76H
inga
ngha
tW
adne
r34
.77%
15.0
7%8.
55%
71.7
0%6.
8411
.99
78.5
4%16
.41%
77.2
8%95
.70%
85.5
5%88
.36%
74.2
2%73
.36%
56.9
5%33
.05%
62.6
6%
77H
inga
ngha
tW
ani
32.2
4%11
.11%
11.1
1%76
.60%
6.47
11.8
772
.28%
42.4
5%74
.94%
93.2
7%81
.43%
91.0
2%60
.61%
67.3
5%57
.55%
35.9
2%51
.63%
78H
inga
ngha
tW
arud
57.9
1%13
.09%
5.76
%76
.49%
6.07
11.7
879
.11%
18.6
7%68
.07%
92.0
9%64
.87%
91.1
4%66
.77%
68.9
9%37
.34%
42.0
9%56
.65%
79H
inga
ngha
tW
ela
39.6
8%17
.59%
13.4
3%70
.01%
6.83
12.0
077
.68%
40.6
7%73
.42%
93.8
5%80
.36%
87.7
0%65
.67%
73.6
1%53
.77%
41.6
7%62
.70%
80H
inga
ngha
tY
enor
a42
.97%
16.3
8%3.
45%
74.8
6%6.
8412
.00
72.8
9%50
.20%
81.2
7%92
.37%
76.7
1%93
.57%
79.9
2%66
.67%
50.6
0%46
.99%
61.4
5%
81H
inga
ngha
tY
erla
46.3
7%9.
23%
6.67
%76
.94%
6.31
11.9
574
.82%
7.82
%73
.73%
94.6
9%76
.54%
94.1
3%74
.30%
77.6
5%60
.89%
58.3
8%55
.31%
82K
aran
jaB
ihad
i57
.85%
24.8
4%4.
58%
75.0
0%6.
4712
.00
86.0
7%26
.44%
82.6
0%92
.72%
52.1
1%88
.51%
40.2
3%61
.69%
69.3
5%34
.87%
27.9
7%% of Pacca house
SN
.B
lock
GP
% of HH withown land
% of HHwith irrigated land
% of HH doingsupplementary occupation
% of working pop
MYS (Years)
SLE (Years)
% of non-addictedpopulation
% of HH with SHGmember
% of persons (>6) % ofwith bank accounts
% of HH with electricity
% of HH with LPG
% of Owned HH
% of HH with DW
% of HH with Usingtoilets
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Drainage
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Garbage disposal
83K
aran
jaB
onda
rT
hana
62.7
6%36
.41%
5.98
%79
.29%
5.65
12.0
081
.68%
32.0
7%79
.71%
94.1
4%23
.10%
90.6
9%59
.31%
68.6
2%58
.62%
40.0
0%27
.59%
84K
aran
jaB
orga
on(D
hole
)47
.87%
34.0
7%5.
19%
80.7
7%6.
1711
.19
78.0
1%27
.30%
85.4
3%93
.62%
55.3
2%92
.55%
47.5
2%67
.38%
33.6
9%29
.08%
34.4
0%
85K
aran
jaD
haw
asa
58.4
6%42
.14%
5.03
%77
.37%
6.2
12.0
079
.63%
41.5
4%87
.62%
93.3
8%39
.71%
88.6
0%36
.76%
63.9
7%53
.31%
29.7
8%25
.37%
86K
aran
jaE
karju
n70
.70%
31.0
8%2.
39%
78.4
0%6.
1812
.00
82.7
5%40
.56%
84.8
4%96
.90%
58.0
3%91
.83%
67.8
9%72
.39%
78.0
3%28
.73%
37.1
8%
87K
aran
jaJa
sapu
r65
.17%
50.3
8%9.
16%
74.2
0%6.
4712
.00
88.2
9%23
.88%
82.5
3%95
.52%
64.6
8%97
.01%
100.
00%
97.3
9%71
.14%
36.3
2%23
.66%
88K
aran
jaK
ajal
i37
.61%
53.0
3%10
.61%
77.4
0%6.
4712
.00
81.0
1%39
.60%
91.1
0%95
.73%
70.6
6%90
.88%
58.1
2%97
.49%
67.8
1%27
.64%
40.1
7%
89K
aran
jaK
anna
mw
ar G
ram
25.6
1%14
.43%
4.12
%80
.66%
5.76
11.9
581
.86%
15.3
6%89
.56%
93.8
0%41
.24%
91.9
1%64
.69%
59.8
4%44
.47%
30.1
9%20
.75%
90K
aran
jaK
hara
skha
nda
57.8
6%30
.11%
5.38
%76
.60%
7.15
12.0
087
.93%
21.3
8%92
.07%
94.9
7%52
.20%
92.4
5%25
.79%
66.0
4%57
.86%
30.1
9%38
.99%
91K
aran
jaK
inha
la57
.84%
41.5
3%1.
69%
74.1
5%6.
8912
.00
79.7
6%50
.00%
86.3
9%96
.08%
61.7
6%95
.59%
98.5
3%85
.29%
80.3
9%49
.02%
29.4
1%
92K
aran
jaK
undi
47.1
8%35
.82%
7.46
%70
.07%
7.14
12.0
078
.42%
32.8
6%87
.59%
94.1
3%50
.47%
94.6
0%29
.58%
76.0
6%49
.30%
40.6
1%37
.79%
93K
aran
jaP
ardi
50.9
0%27
.06%
5.88
%74
.53%
6.57
11.9
280
.79%
25.8
7%84
.19%
94.8
3%52
.35%
92.9
0%51
.50%
65.4
6%70
.04%
24.3
1%28
.76%
94K
aran
jaP
arso
di42
.86%
44.6
6%9.
71%
81.6
1%6.
412
.00
80.5
7%34
.45%
88.9
6%95
.38%
50.4
2%94
.96%
60.1
0%75
.21%
57.5
6%36
.97%
28.5
7%
95K
aran
jaS
awal
59.1
6%42
.31%
5.13
%79
.84%
5.6
12.0
078
.16%
29.0
1%87
.06%
95.0
4%30
.53%
96.1
8%59
.16%
97.2
0%20
.99%
44.2
7%30
.92%
96K
aran
jaS
awli
Kh
48.6
9%40
.78%
9.22
%76
.09%
6.7
12.0
078
.30%
21.4
7%85
.56%
94.0
7%54
.80%
90.2
3%58
.99%
57.8
9%54
.28%
34.2
1%41
.71%
97K
aran
jaS
elga
on (
Um
ate)
40.6
5%38
.76%
7.75
%80
.84%
5.2
12.0
077
.73%
33.5
5%90
.49%
95.1
6%45
.81%
88.3
9%47
.74%
70.6
5%44
.84%
43.2
3%28
.71%
98K
aran
jaS
elga
on L
awan
e56
.30%
34.5
2%7.
10%
75.2
2%6.
3512
.00
75.9
3%34
.90%
89.0
9%95
.01%
50.7
3%95
.31%
55.4
3%67
.74%
73.3
1%48
.09%
36.3
6%
99K
aran
jaU
mar
i59
.07%
29.3
9%3.
07%
75.7
7%6.
2311
.95
82.7
9%20
.98%
87.6
5%95
.60%
38.3
4%91
.71%
35.7
5%65
.80%
39.3
8%13
.47%
26.4
2%
100
Sam
udra
pur
Dho
ndga
on49
.33%
14.8
5%11
.39%
78.5
6%5.
6511
.96
74.0
5%58
.49%
78.0
8%94
.61%
66.5
8%93
.26%
58.2
2%69
.54%
62.8
0%84
.91%
35.8
5%
101
Sam
udra
pur
Far
idpu
r51
.55%
16.2
0%15
.54%
86.4
3%5.
0312
.00
70.3
5%68
.99%
80.6
1%95
.35%
82.5
6%93
.80%
29.8
4%61
.24%
70.1
6%95
.74%
41.4
7%
102
Sam
udra
pur
Hiw
ara
67.0
1%20
.00%
14.6
3%76
.98%
6.16
4528
12.0
077
.51%
59.0
8%82
.07%
97.0
8%78
.71%
96.4
5%95
.62%
78.7
1%25
.26%
79.9
6%47
.39%
103
Sam
udra
pur
Kar
da43
.40%
23.3
3%6.
67%
82.3
1%6.
1766
6712
.00
97.1
2%67
.92%
88.4
6%92
.45%
66.0
4%86
.79%
97.7
3%81
.13%
47.1
7%67
.92%
26.4
2%
104
Sam
udra
pur
Kha
ndal
a52
.76%
21.5
5%6.
90%
64.8
4%6.
3443
411
.90
83.1
8%36
.18%
72.5
9%95
.98%
82.9
1%96
.48%
94.4
7%91
.96%
43.7
2%67
.34%
46.7
3%
105
Sam
udra
pur
Lasa
npur
59.4
5%20
.45%
11.9
0%80
.56%
6.18
4806
11.9
780
.56%
65.7
4%72
.54%
90.4
3%82
.62%
96.4
5%50
.13%
70.0
3%21
.41%
90.4
3%52
.14%
106
Sam
udra
pur
Nan
dori
28.7
5%16
.88%
13.9
2%78
.29%
6.32
2384
12.0
074
.09%
52.9
7%72
.05%
92.9
2%83
.29%
89.6
6%38
.10%
67.0
0%71
.53%
90.4
3%45
.61%
107
Sam
udra
pur
Nirg
udi
50.5
1%18
.63%
11.7
6%74
.02%
4.81
8773
12.0
083
.44%
65.8
2%75
.06%
94.9
0%58
.67%
97.9
6%71
.94%
67.3
5%28
.06%
76.0
2%32
.14%
108
Sam
udra
pur
Saw
angi
(Zad
e)48
.12%
24.1
0%8.
21%
79.9
5%6.
0533
8712
.00
69.4
4%55
.65%
76.2
5%89
.52%
76.6
1%91
.13%
50.5
4%69
.09%
54.0
3%94
.09%
44.8
9%
109
Sam
udra
pur
Sew
a53
.42%
9.90
%8.
91%
82.9
3%4.
9469
712
.00
69.4
6%44
.10%
79.0
9%90
.68%
67.7
0%96
.89%
84.4
7%78
.26%
9.32
%62
.11%
27.9
5%
110
Sam
udra
pur
Tas
56.8
5%28
.36%
10.9
5%81
.70%
6.01
4118
12.0
073
.83%
58.0
4%85
.34%
90.1
8%75
.60%
93.1
5%67
.56%
74.1
1%39
.58%
66.3
7%41
.37%% of Pacca house
SN
.B
lock
GP
Wardha Development Report
128
Appendix 5
129
% of HH withown land
% of HHwith irrigated land
111
Sam
udra
pur
Ubd
a33
.70%
28.8
5%16
.35%
80.1
8%6.
1053
0211
.93
77.2
7%50
.36%
78.4
2%94
.20%
76.8
1%90
.58%
79.3
5%59
.78%
60.8
7%66
.37%
48.9
1%
112
Sam
udra
pur
Wad
gaon
59.0
2%32
.37%
8.97
%81
.00%
6.28
376
12.0
071
.88%
64.7
6%84
.81%
93.8
4%77
.07%
94.6
9%56
.90%
73.4
6%36
.52%
88.7
5%50
.53%
113
Sam
udra
pur
Wai
gaon
(G
ond)
71.6
5%16
.00%
6.40
%80
.27%
6.06
7114
12.0
079
.06%
57.6
2%76
.33%
94.2
1%80
.18%
96.0
4%86
.28%
83.8
4%17
.99%
75.6
1%39
.63%
114
Sam
udra
pur
Was
hi47
.36%
19.3
5%5.
38%
80.6
5%6.
0784
4812
.00
75.5
2%51
.66%
84.6
7%96
.48%
87.2
8%92
.17%
79.0
6%60
.86%
55.3
8%88
.06%
45.4
0%
115
Sel
ooA
koli
38.6
9%16
.38%
21.5
5%81
.23%
4.67
11.4
671
.62%
25.7
3%73
.46%
84.4
6%55
.44%
95.1
6%70
.12%
48.3
6%33
.68%
40.9
3%36
.27%
116
Sel
ooD
eulg
aon
43.4
1%8.
59%
11.6
6%81
.46%
5.23
11.9
576
.84%
46.4
3%78
.30%
91.4
8%76
.37%
95.8
8%81
.87%
71.4
3%15
.11%
31.5
9%44
.51%
117
Sel
ooJu
wad
i42
.91%
3.28
%4.
92%
77.2
9%5.
9512
.00
81.7
5%56
.74%
80.1
6%93
.26%
68.4
4%96
.10%
89.7
2%63
.12%
35.1
1%41
.49%
38.3
0%
118
Sel
ooD
indo
da56
.75%
1.38
%14
.48%
76.5
9%5.
8112
.00
77.2
1%61
.11%
81.3
8%94
.44%
74.2
1%98
.02%
85.3
2%73
.81%
27.7
8%31
.35%
36.5
1%
119
Sel
ooH
elod
i43
.44%
11.2
7%11
.27%
80.2
9%6.
212
.00
77.4
0%46
.56%
83.5
8%91
.25%
75.9
4%95
.00%
88.7
5%82
.50%
44.3
8%41
.25%
47.1
9%
120
Sel
ooJa
ypur
37.6
9%4.
95%
7.92
%76
.29%
6.1
12.0
076
.28%
52.3
1%84
.89%
96.5
4%78
.85%
94.2
3%93
.08%
84.6
2%37
.69%
29.2
3%47
.69%
121
Sel
ooK
hada
ki33
.33%
7.63
%5.
93%
81.2
6%5.
2712
.00
76.6
2%50
.75%
76.2
1%93
.39%
81.6
8%92
.49%
81.9
8%84
.08%
43.2
4%40
.54%
53.4
5%
122
Sel
ooK
opar
a46
.42%
3.01
%5.
26%
76.3
8%6.
2711
.88
75.3
0%32
.83%
85.4
2%92
.83%
79.2
5%94
.72%
88.6
8%77
.74%
42.6
4%31
.32%
41.1
3%
123
Sel
ooS
alai
(kal
a)48
.97%
1.05
%6.
32%
81.9
9%5.
8812
.00
80.6
9%55
.15%
86.3
1%91
.75%
85.5
7%92
.78%
82.4
7%71
.65%
27.3
2%26
.29%
45.8
8%
124
Sel
ooS
alai
(Pev
ath)
45.8
3%3.
03%
4.08
%82
.59%
5.65
12.0
078
.48%
43.0
6%83
.66%
97.2
2%80
.09%
95.8
3%82
.41%
76.3
9%27
.31%
21.7
6%38
.43%
125
Sel
ooS
aldo
h33
.86%
12.0
3%9.
02%
70.2
5%6.
2111
.97
78.7
0%48
.56%
79.8
8%94
.49%
78.2
2%93
.18%
82.6
8%80
.31%
59.0
6%37
.27%
53.0
2%
126
Sel
ooS
ukal
i(sta
tion)
38.4
2%5.
97%
14.9
3%78
.68%
6.13
12.0
079
.83%
40.4
7%83
.55%
95.3
1%78
.59%
95.6
0%89
.15%
78.3
0%46
.63%
33.1
4%51
.91%
127
Sel
ooTa
kali(
kite
)45
.45%
4.55
%6.
06%
81.6
1%5.
7512
.00
80.0
8%69
.93%
86.6
9%94
.41%
68.5
3%91
.61%
82.5
2%80
.42%
40.5
6%25
.17%
36.3
6%
128
Sel
ooW
adga
on K
hurd
52.1
3%24
.67%
12.6
7%72
.71%
6.51
11.9
480
.80%
57.8
0%73
.45%
97.1
6%86
.17%
97.8
7%90
.07%
90.0
7%49
.65%
54.6
1%57
.80%
129
Sel
ooW
adga
on(J
angl
i)54
.35%
14.2
9%11
.90%
77.3
2%6.
6812
.00
79.8
2%58
.70%
90.3
6%94
.78%
84.7
8%96
.52%
85.6
5%80
.87%
47.3
9%38
.70%
49.5
7%
130
Sel
ooW
agha
la51
.90%
8.77
%15
.79%
76.5
1%6.
4212
.00
76.2
0%57
.91%
87.0
4%94
.94%
80.3
8%95
.89%
89.5
6%77
.22%
43.0
4%38
.92%
49.0
5%
131
Sel
ooZ
adsh
i42
.20%
13.8
1%15
.24%
78.5
9%6.
2612
.00
77.4
2%50
.73%
90.9
7%94
.18%
83.5
8%93
.35%
86.9
0%80
.04%
51.7
7%37
.01%
52.1
8%
132
War
dha
Anj
i(Mot
i)24
.13%
30.4
7%20
.57%
64.4
0%7.
1111
.97
78.1
8%41
.67%
79.9
8%96
.74%
83.0
4%91
.09%
85.0
0%77
.25%
82.2
5%62
.68%
62.2
5%
133
War
dha
Bhi
vapu
r56
.83%
35.7
8%11
.01%
69.2
7%6.
5312
.00
74.5
3%65
.03%
79.9
4%98
.36%
73.2
2%94
.54%
81.9
7%73
.22%
92.3
5%85
.79%
73.7
7%
134
War
dha
Bod
ad36
.28%
35.7
1%15
.48%
68.2
3%6.
7712
.00
83.2
9%60
.18%
78.4
1%97
.35%
81.4
2%91
.59%
81.8
6%84
.07%
82.3
0%68
.14%
73.8
9%
135
War
dha
Dah
egao
n M
iski
n51
.27%
20.2
7%15
.51%
74.2
0%6.
0312
.00
75.9
5%71
.83%
77.8
3%94
.37%
72.6
8%92
.11%
56.3
4%76
.62%
63.3
8%80
.00%
62.2
5%
136
War
dha
Dha
man
gaon
45.4
2%24
.62%
23.8
5%73
.14%
5.76
12.0
078
.20%
65.2
7%82
.24%
88.5
5%66
.03%
94.6
6%77
.10%
77.8
6%80
.53%
74.0
5%61
.83%
137
War
dha
Dho
tra(
Ste
)46
.35%
27.1
7%14
.13%
68.3
1%5.
7512
.00
77.2
2%63
.54%
79.9
4%94
.27%
75.0
0%95
.31%
73.9
6%70
.83%
71.3
5%73
.44%
60.4
2%
138
War
dha
Gan
eshp
ur41
.48%
23.2
3%20
.20%
75.9
4%5.
0911
.93
72.8
0%51
.53%
78.8
2%89
.52%
66.8
1%89
.96%
52.4
0%75
.11%
52.8
4%63
.32%
62.8
8%
SN
.B
lock
GP
% of HH doingsupplementary occupation
% of working pop
MYS (Years)
SLE (Years)
% of non-addictedpopulation
% of HH with SHGmember
% of persons (>6) % ofwith bank accounts
% of HH with electricity
% of HH with LPG
% of Owned HH
% of HH with DW
% of HH with Usingtoilets
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Drainage
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Garbage disposal
% of Pacca house
% of HH withown land
% of HHwith irrigated land
% of HH doingsupplementary occupation
% of working pop
MYS (Years)
SLE (Years)
% of non-addictedpopulation
% of HH with SHGmember
% of persons (>6) % ofwith bank accounts
% of HH with electricity
% of HH with LPG
% of Owned HH
% of HH with DW
% of HH with Usingtoilets
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Drainage
% of HH with hygienicfacility of Garbage disposal
139
War
dha
Inza
pur
18.7
9%31
.51%
10.9
6%68
.58%
6.14
12.0
072
.76%
44.5
1%72
.17%
98.8
4%83
.24%
86.9
9%54
.62%
82.0
8%58
.96%
62.7
2%73
.70%
140
War
dha
Kel
apur
55.3
6%19
.38%
17.8
3%71
.77%
6.4
12.0
080
.24%
74.1
1%81
.45%
93.3
0%79
.46%
92.4
1%95
.98%
80.3
6%60
.71%
67.4
1%66
.96%
141
War
dha
Lons
awal
i46
.50%
18.3
4%2.
37%
78.9
3%5.
3411
.96
69.6
0%57
.14%
85.2
9%94
.53%
69.0
0%97
.26%
89.3
6%73
.56%
55.9
3%92
.71%
55.9
3%
142
War
dha
Nim
gaon
46.5
9%21
.18%
18.8
2%71
.23%
6.19
12.0
079
.71%
56.8
2%83
.20%
94.8
9%71
.59%
95.4
5%82
.95%
78.9
8%69
.89%
62.5
0%66
.48%
143
War
dha
Pal
oti
30.5
6%26
.52%
15.9
1%71
.57%
6.7
12.0
075
.40%
47.6
8%78
.46%
93.8
9%78
.73%
94.8
7%81
.66%
83.3
7%81
.66%
66.0
1%61
.37%
144
War
dha
Pet
h49
.76%
13.8
9%15
.74%
69.6
6%6.
8212
.00
77.0
7%47
.34%
86.8
8%96
.14%
77.7
8%94
.69%
94.6
9%85
.99%
86.9
6%73
.43%
60.3
9%
145
War
dha
Sal
od(H
isap
ur)
31.5
7%19
.74%
22.7
5%73
.37%
6.56
11.9
578
.28%
54.7
1%77
.71%
96.6
4%86
.71%
93.9
3%44
.64%
83.7
9%73
.50%
61.2
1%65
.29%
146
War
dha
Sat
oda
17.6
7%23
.68%
14.9
1%62
.42%
7.5
11.9
879
.27%
50.5
7%79
.45%
97.2
4%89
.14%
87.5
2%65
.32%
87.2
0%63
.37%
43.6
0%77
.96%
147
War
dha
Sel
ukat
e32
.82%
21.0
5%13
.82%
70.7
6%6.
1212
.00
76.3
2%53
.52%
73.3
0%93
.61%
75.5
5%89
.87%
79.7
4%85
.46%
76.6
5%62
.56%
61.6
7%
148
War
dha
Tale
gaon
(Ta)
48.1
9%40
.12%
12.1
8%72
.75%
6.67
11.9
475
.79%
40.6
6%79
.44%
97.6
3%88
.13%
93.1
9%37
.87%
73.6
8%81
.22%
73.8
9%73
.58%
149
War
dha
Tig
aon
41.2
6%7.
22%
19.5
9%75
.60%
5.77
11.9
275
.43%
60.0
9%83
.35%
93.7
2%69
.96%
91.9
3%89
.24%
76.6
8%80
.27%
83.4
1%56
.95%
150
War
dha
Um
ari(M
eghe
)18
.90%
20.1
3%17
.45%
60.9
8%7.
5511
.84
78.8
8%45
.31%
71.8
0%93
.70%
82.9
8%94
.37%
80.8
3%72
.39%
58.9
8%38
.74%
67.8
3%
151
War
dha
Wad
adh
52.1
0%20
.65%
9.68
%72
.42%
6.03
12.0
073
.24%
8.39
%80
.61%
96.1
5%67
.83%
97.2
0%64
.34%
76.5
7%78
.32%
86.3
6%68
.18%
152
War
dha
Wai
gaon
(Nip
ani)
33.6
6%28
.20%
16.1
6%69
.34%
6.83
11.9
871
.47%
51.8
6%82
.15%
95.7
4%85
.85%
90.2
7%47
.81%
72.4
0%70
.55%
52.8
4%74
.15%% of Pacca house
SN
.B
lock
GP
Wardha Development Report
130