http://tih.sagepub.com/Toxicology and Industrial Health
http://tih.sagepub.com/content/28/8/675The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/0748233711420473
2012 28: 675 originally published online 27 October 2011Toxicol Ind HealthMurthy Prakhya
Surekha Pasupuleti, Srinivas Alapati, Selvam Ganapathy, Goparaju Anumolu, Neelakanta Reddy Pully and BalakrishnaToxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles through oral route
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
can be found at:Toxicology and Industrial HealthAdditional services and information for
http://tih.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsEmail Alerts:
http://tih.sagepub.com/subscriptionsSubscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:
http://tih.sagepub.com/content/28/8/675.refs.htmlCitations:
What is This?
- Oct 27, 2011 OnlineFirst Version of Record
- Aug 7, 2012Version of Record >>
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticlesthrough oral route
Surekha Pasupuleti1, Srinivas Alapati1,Selvam Ganapathy1, Goparaju Anumolu1,Neelakanta Reddy Pully2, and Balakrishna Murthy Prakhya1
AbstractThis experiment was aimed to determine the significance of dose by comparing acute oral toxicologicalpotential of nano-sized zinc oxide (20 nm) with its micro-sized zinc oxide. Sprague Dawley rats, 8 to 9 weeksold, were administered with 5, 50, 300, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) of nano- and micro-sized zincoxide suspended in distilled water once through oral gavage. The effects of the micro- and nano-sized zincoxide on biochemical and hematological parameters were analyzed on day 14 of administration. The organswere collected for histopathology. Interestingly, inverse dose-dependent increase was noted in aspartateaminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase serum levels of nano-size zinc oxide groups when comparedwith their micro-sized zinc oxide. Clotting time was effected in all the male groups of nano-size zinc oxide,except in 1000 mg/kg b.w. The incidences of microscopic lesions in liver, pancreas, heart and stomach werehigher in lower doses of nano-size zinc oxide compared to higher dose. However, the incidences of abovelesions were higher in rats treated with a high dose of micro-sized zinc oxide. We conclude that nano-sizezinc oxide exhibited toxicity at lower doses, thus alarming future nanotoxicology research needs to befocused on importance of dose metrics rather following the conventional methods while conducting in vivoexperiments.
KeywordsZinc oxide, nanoparticles, dose, oral, acute toxicity
Introduction
Due to the wide application of nanomaterials in indus-
try, agriculture, business, medicine and public health
nanotechnology has gained a great deal of public
interest. Nanotechnology includes the integration of
these nanoscale structures into larger material compo-
nents and systems and construction of new and
improved materials at the nanoscale (Ju-Nam and
Lead, 2008). Nanoscience involves research to dis-
cover new behavior and properties or materials with
dimension at the nanoscale (NNI, 2008). Thorough
evaluation of desirable versus adverse effects is
required for safe applications of engineered nanoma-
terials (ENMs) and major challenges lie ahead to
answer the key questions of nanotoxicology
(Oberdorster, 2010).
Since the investment in nanotechnology research
and development is growing, the value of products
utilizing these technologies may exceed to $3 trillion
by 2015 (Lux Research, 2009); hence understanding,
identifying and addressing the potential risks of these
novel materials to human health and the environment
is of great interest (Chemical Industry Vision, 2020;
ICON 2008; Luther, 2004; Maynard, 2006; Maynard
et al., 2006; Oberdorster et al., 2005; PCAST, 2010;
RCEP, 2008; SCENIHR, 2009, 2005).
1International Institute of Biotechnology and Toxicology (IIBAT),Padappai, Tamil Nadu, India2Central Leather Research Institute, Adyar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu,India
Corresponding author:Pasupuleti Surekha, Department of Toxicology, InternationalInstitute of Biotechnology and Toxicology (IIBAT), Padappai601301, Tamil Nadu, IndiaEmail: [email protected]
Toxicology and Industrial Health28(8) 675–686ª The Author(s) 2012Reprints and permissions:sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.navDOI: 10.1177/0748233711420473tih.sagepub.com
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Currently, metal oxide nanoparticles have not been
comprehensively assessed in regard to the potential
effects on human health, due to exposure (accidental
or otherwise) in the workplace during the production
of nanoparticles or exposure through use in commer-
cial products (e.g. titanium dioxide [TiO2] or ZnO
sunscreens).
Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles are widely used in
various applications including cosmetics, paints, as
drug carriers and fillings in medical materials (Dufour
et al., 2006). These metal oxide nanoparticles can also
be employed in environmental remediation due to
their good absorptive and photocatalytic properties
for elimination or degradation of pollutants in water
or air (Qiang, 2001). In addition, photocatalytic stud-
ies indicated that these nanomaterials showed good
photocatalytic performance for organic pollutants in
water (Wu and Huanga, 2010).
In spite of the fact that ZnO is a widely used ingre-
dient in dermatological preparations and sunscreens
and many other products, only two investigations
have focused on the effects of these nanoparticles
through oral administration on mice and through diet-
ary exposure on snails (Croteau et al., 2011; Wang
et al., 2008).
Although many studies aimed to understand the
importance of physicochemical properties such as
size, surface area, crystal structure, agglomerating
property and surface charge in influencing the biolo-
gical activity (Hoet et al., 1999, 2001; Hoshino
et al., 2004; Magrez et al., 2006; Nel et al., 2006;
Oberdorster et al., 2005; Wick et al., 2007), the use
of appropriate dose metric needs to be carefully con-
sidered. Keeping in mind the uncertainity in dose
selection, we have made an attempt to understand the
importance of dose by comparing nano-size ZnO with
its micro-size counterpart at different dose levels.
Materials and methods
ZnO nanoparticles (Stock No. 5810HT) were purchased
from Nanostructured and Amorphous Materials, Inc.
USA. The ZnO (Product No. ZO385) was purchased
from Sigma Aldrich, USA.
Physicochemical characterization
ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized by wet chemistry
method. The manufacturer specifications for nanoma-
terial characterization were confirmed by the
following techniques. The characteristics of ZnO
nanoparticles were assessed in the as-synthesized
form prior to use in experiments or after dispersion
in the vehicle (water) for dosing. Solution (water)
characteristics were measured with dynamic light
scattering (DLS), at Malvern Aimil Ltd, Bangalore.
The size of nano-size ZnO was determined with scan-
ning electron microscopy (SEM), at Anna University,
Chennai. SEM produces images by rastering a pri-
mary electron beam across the sample surface while
detecting secondary or backscattered electrons, which
are emitted from the surface. Therefore, the images
obtained in an SEM provide a 3D quality and greater
resolution. In this study, Hitachi S-520 SEM was used
at an accelerating voltage of 10,000 V after depositing
the samples onto aluminum stubs with double-sided
carbon adhesive tape. Photon correlation spectro-
scopy or DLS is an analytical technique capable
of measuring the size of very small particles, at
low sample concentrations. Measurement of parti-
cle size of nano ZnO in solution was determined
with DLS on a Malvern Zetasizer nanoseries (Nano
ZS) with Malvern application software version
6.20. This instrument can measure particle sizes
ranging from 0.6 nm to 6 mm using noninvasive
back scatter (NIBS) technology and DLS. The Mal-
vern Zetasizer can also provide zeta potential mea-
surements in aqueous and nonaqueous dispersions
using M3-phase analysis light scattering (PALS)
technology. Zeta potential is defined as the accu-
mulation of charge around the surface of a particle
in solution and gives an indication of the stability
of the colloidal system.
Animals and housing conditions
Experimental animals were obtained from in-house
animal facility. All procedures using animals were
reviewed and approved by the institutional animal
ethics committee.
Acute oral toxicity test in rats
Acute oral toxicity—acute toxic class method was
conducted per the Organization for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD) 423 guide-
lines (OECD, 2001) with modifications in terms of
different dose levels, usage of sexes, animal number,
and inclusion of hematology, biochemical parameters
and histopathology evaluation. The healthy Sprague
Dawley rats of both sex, aged between 8 and 9 weeks
and body weights of 180–220 g were used. Females
were nulliparous and nonpregnant. The animals were
procured from breeding facilities of International
676 Toxicology and Industrial Health 28(8)
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Institute of Biotechnology and Toxicology (IIBAT).
Animals were housed in polypropylene cages with
stainless steel grills and gamma-irradiated corn cobs
were used as bedding. Bedding material, cages, grills
and water bottles were changed on alternate days.
Animals were housed individually sex wise and group
wise. Animals were acclimated for a minimum period
of 5 days in the controlled environment (temperature:
22 + 3�C; relative humidity: 50 + 20% and light:
12-h light/dark cycle) and ad libitum supply of reverse
osmosis water and a standard rodent pellet feed
(supplier: M/s. Tetragon Chemie Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore,
India). Feed alone was withdrawn overnight prior
to the dosing and following dosing, for a period of
3 hours.
One hundred and ten animals were distributed
randomly into different groups (Table 1).
The test materials (either micro-size ZnO or nano-
size ZnO) were suspended in distilled water and
administered through oral gavage once at dose levels
of 5, 50, 300, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg body weight
(b.w.). The test solution was prepared shortly prior
to the administration. The dose volume maintained
for all the groups was maximum (10 ml/kg b.w.).
Similarly, control group of animals (5 males and
5 females) were dosed with distilled water alone.
Animals were observed for mortality/morbidity,
clinical signs of toxicity, weekly body weight and
weekly food consumption during the experimental
period.
At the end of 14 days of administration, the animals
were killed and the blood was obtained through
ophthalmic vein. The organs such as esophagus,
stomach, small and large intestines, liver, spleen,
thymus, mandibular and mesenteric lymphnodes, kid-
ney, urinary bladder, heart, pancreas, brain, lungs ovar-
ies and testes were collected, and all the organs were
kept in 10% buffered formalin and the testes in mod-
ified Davidson fluid.
Clinical biochemistry
The serum obtained after centrifuging was analyzed
for biochemical parameters such as creatinine,
albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine amino-
transferase (ALT), amylase, aspartate aminotransfer-
ase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), calcium,
cholinesterase, total cholesterol, glucose, HDL choles-
terol, iron, phosphorus, total protein, triglycerides,
urea and zinc using Humastar 300 fully automated
biochemistry analyzer (Human GmbH., Germany),
and sodium, potassium and chlorides in serum were
analyzed on day 14 by means of a humalyte electrolyte
analyzer (Human GmbH., Germany).
Hematology
Blood treated with EDTA was used for analyzing
hematology parameters such as erythrocyte count (red
blood cell [RBC]), hemoglobin, hematocrit (HCT),
mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular
hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin
concentration (MCHC), platelet (PLT) count, total
leucocyte count (white blood cell [WBC]) and differ-
ential count (five parameters namely neutrophils,
eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes and monocytes)
were determined on day 14 using Bayer ADVIA
120, fully automated hematology analyzer (Bayer,
Table 1. Groups and dose levels of micro- and nano-sizezinc oxide
Group Dose No. of animals
Micro-size zinc oxideG1 Vehicle control 5 Males and 5 femalesG2 (M-5) 5 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 femalesG3 (M-50) 50 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 femalesG4 (M-300) 300 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 femalesG5 (M-1000) 1000 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 femalesG6 (M-2000) 2000 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 females
Nano-size zinc oxideG7 (N-5) 5 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 femalesG8 (N-50) 50 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 femalesG9 (N-300) 300 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 femalesG10 (N-1000) 1000 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 femalesG11 (N-2000) 2000 mg/kg b.w. 5 Males and 5 females Figure 1. Scanningelectronmicroscopic (SEM) imageof nano
zinc oxide.
Pasupuleti et al. 677
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Germany). Clotting time of blood was determined by
capillary tube method.
Necropsy
Gross pathology was performed at the end of experi-
mental period (day 14).
Histopathology
Histopathology of organs (liver, spleen, kidneys,
heart, adrenals, lungs, pancreas, stomach, esophagus,
small and large intestine) were evaluated. Tissues
were collected and preserved in 10% buffered forma-
lin. All tissues required for histopathology evaluation
were subjected to dehydration procedure and processed
in tissue processor, embedded in paraffin wax and
prepared sections of 5–8 mm thickness and stained
with hematoxylin-eosin stain.
Statistical analysis
The data was expressed as mean þ/� standard devia-
tion for statistical analysis. A comparison of treated
rats with control groups was done using Newman–
Table 2. Nano zinc oxide characterization
Average sizea Size using SEM Size in distilled waterb Polydispersity index Surface areac (m2/g) Zeta potentiald
20 nm 63 nm 224.7 nm 0.305 50 �30.9
SEM: scanning electron microscopy.aAccording to the manufacturer.bUsing dynamic light scattering (DLS).cUsing BET (Brunauer, Emmett, Teller) analysis.dUsing zeta sizer.
Table 3. Clinical biochemistry parameters (males and females)
Group ALT AST Ca
MalesG1 65.0 + 14.1 141 + 16.6 8.0 + 0.6G2 (M-5) 83.2 + 12.9 129.2 + 9.0 8.0 + 0.6G3 (M-50) 71.0 + 13.6 135.6 + 6.3 8.4 + 0.7G4 (M-300) 72.8 + 19.8 139.8 + 11.6 9.1 + 0.3G5 (M-1000) 80.0 + 14.8 135.6 + 11.0 8.8 + 0.6G6 (M-2000) 73.0 + 14.0 151.8 + 6.9 8.3 + 0.5G7 (N-5) 747.0 + 120.6a,b 687.4 + 83.1a,b 10.1 + 0.1a,b
G8 (N-50) 514 + 88.0a,b 553.6 + 55.5a,b 10.3 + 0.2a,b
G9 (N-300) 428.6 + 111.5a,b 509.6 + 41.5a,b 10.6 + 0.4a,b
G10 (N-1000) 395.2 + 57.8a,b 411.8 + 66.6a,b 10.2 + 0.2a,b
G11 (N-2000) 298.4 + 119.1a,b 357.4 + 69.3a,b 10.1 + 0.1a,b
FemalesG1 68.6 + 12.2 150.6 + 11.5 9.2 + 0.6G2 (M-5) 78.6 + 8.4 152.8 + 10.7 9.6 + 0.8G3 (M-50) 71.8 + 8.8 152.2 + 12.0 9.2 + 0.8G4 (M-300) 79.2 + 6.4 157.4 + 9.1 9.4 + 0.8G5 (M-1000) 79.2 + 6.4 157.4 + 9.1 9.4 + 0.8G6 (M-2000) 76.0 + 15.0 140.8 + 12.4 9.7 + 0.6G7 (N-5) 712.2 + 169.5a,b 501.6 + 49.3a,b 10.0 + 0.3G8 (N-50) 521.4 + 39.8a,b 404.8 + 86.7a,b 9.6 + 0.8G9 (N-300) 464.2 + 61.2a,b 345.8 + 50.1 9.6 + 0.7G10 (N-1000) 355.6 + 106.6a,b 276.6 + 47.6a,b 10.2 + 0.8G11 (N-2000) 248.6 + 126.4a,b 226.8 + 18.8a,b 10.0 + 0.4
ALP: alkaline phosphatase, ALT: alanine transaminase, AST: aspartate transaminase, Ca: calcium.aStatistically different from control; p < 0.05 (n ¼ 5); mean þ/� standard deviation.bStatistically different from micro-size dose group; p < 0.05 (n ¼ 5); mean þ/� standard deviation.
678 Toxicology and Industrial Health 28(8)
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Keuls multiple comparison test. The data found to be
heterogeneous were subjected to nonparametric-
Kruskal–Wallis multiple comparison Z value test. The
comparison of nano- and micro-size ZnO dose groups
were done by Student’s t test and the heterogenous
data subjected to Mann–Whitney U test. The alpha
level at which all tests were conducted is 0.05, and the
NCSS 2007 software was used for analysis.
Results
Physicochemical characterization
The average size of the nano ZnO is 63 nm in SEM
analysis (Figure 1). The properties of the solution of
nanomaterials in distilled water were examined for
changes in size due to agglomeration using DLS
(Dufour et al., 2006). Average size was calculated
Male
Dose
AL
T (
U/L
)
2000 1000 300 50 50
200
400
600
800
1000
Figure 2. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity in malestreated with nano zinc oxide at different dose levels (mg/kgbody weight [b.w.]).
Female
Dose
AL
T (
U/L
)
2000 1000 300 50 50
200
400
600
800
1000
Figure 3. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity in femalestreated with nano zinc oxide at different dose levels (mg/kgbody weight [b.w.]).
Male
Dose
AST
(U
/L)
2000 1000 300 50 50
200
400
600
800
1000
Figure 4. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity inmalestreated with nano zinc oxide at different dose levels (mg/kgbody weight [b.w.]).
Female
Dose
AST
(U
/L)
2000 1000 300 50 50
200
400
600
Figure 5. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity infemales treated with nano zinc oxide at different doselevels (mg/kg body weight [b.w.]).
Pasupuleti et al. 679
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
by the software from the intensity, volume and num-
ber distributions measured (Table 2). The DLS results
illustrate that depending on the material, the nanoma-
terials in solution do not necessarily retain their nano
size (Dufour et al., 2006). The average size of nano
ZnO (in solution) was 224.7 nm. The polydispersity
index was 0.305. The zeta potential of nano-size ZnO
was �30.9 mV (Table 2).
Clinical biochemistry
The effects of micro-size and nano-size ZnO on rats
are presented in Table 3. The results indicated that the
plasma ALT and AST of nano-ZnO-treated rats were
significantly higher than the controls and with the
micro-size counterparts in both the sexes. There is
an inverse dose-dependent increase in the AST and
ALT serum levels in animals treated with nano-size
ZnO compared with their micro-size counterparts
(Figures 2–5). Calcium levels in the serum were also
significantly high from control as well as with the
micro-size ZnO-treated groups in males. Females
have no difference in the calcium levels. However,
there are no significant differences in rest of the para-
meters analyzed (Table 3; Figure 6).
Hematology
There were no statistically significant changes in the
hematologic parameters when compared to control.
Although few parameters such as PLT, HCT and MCV
are statistically different from their micro-size counter-
parts, the values are within the historical range of the
institute. A statistically significant increase in clotting
time was observed in all the treatment groups of nano-
size ZnO with that of micro-size ZnO dose groups except
group 10 ([G10] 1000 mg/kg b.w.; Table 4; Figure 7).
Necropsy
No gross pathological lesions were observed in any of
the treatment groups.
Histopathology
Animals treated with nano- and micro-size ZnO
showed lesions in liver and pancreas. In addition to
Male
Dose
Cal
cium
(m
g/dl
)
2000 1000 300 50 50
5
10
15
Figure 6. Calcium levels in males treated with nano zincoxide at different dose levels (mg/kg body weight [b.w.]).
Table 4. Hematology parameters—males
Group Clotting time (sec)
G1 (control) 83.20 + 9.71G2 (M-5) 107.20 + 9.98G3 (M-50) 111.40 + 12.82G4 (M-300) 105.40 + 26.47G5 (M-1000) 129.60 + 4.16G6 (M-2000) 97.00 + 35.19G7 (N-5) 127.60 + 8.26a
G8 (N-50) 144.80 + 20.91a,b
G9 (N-300) 115.20 + 14.02a,b
G10 (N-1000) 81.60 + 31.33G11 (N-2000) 124.80 + 22.93a,b
a Statistically different from control p < 0.05 (n ¼ 5); + standarddeviation.b Statistically different from micro-size dose group p < 0.05 (n¼ 5);+ standard deviation.
Male
Dose
CT
(se
c)
2000 1000 300 50 50
50
100
150
200
Figure 7. Clotting time inmales treatedwithnanozinc oxideat different dose levels (mg/kg body weight [b.w.]).
680 Toxicology and Industrial Health 28(8)
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
this, animals treated with nano-size ZnO at 2000,
1000, 300, 50 and 5 mg/kg b.w. showed lesions in
stomach and heart as well (Figures 8–11). No lesions
were observed in the similar treatment groups of
micro-size ZnO (Tables 5 and 6).
Discussion
The current study investigated the toxicity response
of nano-size ZnO at different dose levels in Spra-
gue Dawley rats in comparison with their micro-
size ZnO counterparts. Although Wang et al.
(2008) has conducted studies on oral toxicity of
nano-size ZnO (20 and 120 nm) and zinc powder
in mice, they concluded that future research needs
to focus on the toxicity induced by exposure to low
oral dose of small-sized (20-nm) ZnO. We have
conducted the study with lowest dose ranging from
5 mg/kg b.w. to the highest dose of 2000 mg/kg
b.w.
A significant increase in the AST and ALT lev-
els was recorded in all the dose groups treated with
of nano-size ZnO (5–2000 mg/kg b.w. [N-5–N-
2000]). There was an inverse dose-dependent
response suggesting that the damage to liver is high
in the low-dose (5 mg/kg b.w.) group when com-
pared to the high-dose group (2000 mg/kg b.w.).
AST and ALT are the two liver enzymes whose
serum level gets elevated during necrosis, degen-
eration, hepatitis and inflammatory condition (Ellis
et al., 1978; Kellerman, 1995). The incidence of
histopathology lesions of liver correlated with the
elevated liver enzyme levels. Surekha et al. (in
press) have reported the inverse dose response of
nano-size ZnO through dermal route. There is no
change in AST and ALT levels in any of the
groups treated with micro ZnO (5–2000 mg/kg
b.w. [M-5–M-2000]). This may be due to their
large size. The nano-size ZnO at all the dose levels
has raised the above enzyme levels depicting
severe liver damage at the lowest dose levels, thus
suggesting the importance of particle number con-
centration rather than conventional mass concentra-
tion dose metrics. In contradictory to our findings,
previous studies (Maynard and Kuempel, 2005;
Oberdorster, 2000) through inhalation route have
(d) (e)(((((e(e((e(e(e(e(ee(ee(e(e((((e(((e(e(e(e(eeee(ee(e(e(e(e((e(eee(e(e((e(((e(e(e(((e(e(e(((ee(((e(e(e((e(e(e((e(e(e((e(e((((e(((((e((((((((((((((((((e(((ee(((((((((e((e(e(((((ee(((((((e(((((e(((((e((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))((d(d(d(d(d(d(d(d(ddd(d(dd(d(d(d(dddd(d((d(d(d(d(d(dd(d(dd(ddd((d(d(d(d(d(d(d((d(ddd(d(d(d(d(d((d(d(ddd(dddd(dd(d(d(dd((dd(dd((ddd(((dd(d(d((((dd(d((d(d(d(d(d((dddd(((((d(((((d((((d((((d((dddd(((dd(((dd(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 8. (a) Normal structure of liver of control group. Degeneration of liver treated (b) with micro-size zincoxide at dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) and (c) with nano zinc oxide at dose of 2000 mg/kg b.w. Focalnecrosis of liver treated with (d) micro zinc oxide at a dose of 2000 mg/kg b.w. and (e) nano zinc oxide at a dose of2000 mg/kg b.w. (�20).
Pasupuleti et al. 681
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
suggested particle surface area as relevant metric
for small insoluble particles instead of mass concen-
tration which may not necessarily be applicable to the
oral route.
Wang et al. (2008) reported inflammatory cell
infiltration in pancreas at higher dose level (5 g/
kg b.w.) with 120 nm size ZnO powder in CD-
ICR mice. Although similar pancreatic lesion was
observed in the high dose (6 of 10), the incidence
of the lesions was higher in the lower dose (7 of
10) level (5 mg/kg b.w.). Histopathology evalua-
tion of heart and stomach revealed inflammatory
cell infiltration in higher incidence at lower dose
(5 mg/kg b.w.) group when compared to the higher
dose (2000 mg/kg b.w.). The inflammation may be
due to the generation of free radicals by the metal
oxide nanoparticles which leads to oxidative stress
(Kreyling et al., 2006).
Although there is increase in clotting time in males
of all the groups treated with nano-size ZnO except in
G10 (N-1000) the increase is not dose- and sex-
dependent. The increase in clotting time may be due
to decreased synthesis of proteins involved in the
coagulation cascade in the liver (Bloom and Brandt,
2001).
It is important to note that the doses used in pre-
viously published studies were higher than those to
which most people are likely to be exposed.
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 9. (a) Normal architecture of pancreas of control group. Inflammatory cell infiltration treated (b) with micro-size zinc oxide at a dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) and (c) with nano-size zinc oxide at a dose of 2000 mg/kgb.w. (�20).
682 Toxicology and Industrial Health 28(8)
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Oberdorster (2010) recommended that, the results
of toxicological studies using extraordinarily high
experimental doses should be interpreted with cau-
tion. The high toxicity at low doses which were
evident in the present study may be due to the less
number of nanoparticles in that mass, which may
result in less agglomeration, making them to pene-
trate into the cells. In support to our hypothesis
Zook et al. (2011) reported that large agglomerates
of silver nanoparticles cause significantly less
hemolytic toxicity than small agglomerates.
Information about toxicity of nano-enabled prod-
ucts combined with the knowledge of unintentional
human exposure or intentional delivery for medic-
inal purposes must be necessary to determine real
or perceived risks of nanomaterials. Hence, our
results suggest that significance of dose—one of
the key concepts of nanotoxicology—needs to be
(a)
(b)
Figure 10. (a) Normal structure of stomach in controlgroup. (b) Inflammatory cell infiltration, polymorphstreated with nano-size zinc oxide at a dose of 5 mg/kgbody weight [b.w.] �20).
(a)
(b)
Figure 11. (a) Normal structure of heart in control group.(b) Inflammatory cell of heart at a dose of 5 mg/kg bodyweight ([b.w.] nano-sized zinc oxide; �20).
Pasupuleti et al. 683
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
addressed while evaluating the toxicity of engineered
nanomaterials.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Funding
The research received no specific grant from any funding
agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
Bloom JC, Brandt JT (2001) Toxic responses of the blood.
In: Casarette and Doull (eds) Basic Science of Poison.
6th ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Chemical Industry Vision 2020 technology Partnership
and SRC (2005) Joint NNI-ChI CBAN and
SRC CWG5 Nanotechnology research needs
recommendations.
Table 5. Histopathology lesions of target organs
Dose/group Organ Lesions
Incidence
Males Females
Control – – – –G6 (M-2000) Liver Focal necrosis, inflammatory cell foci, degeneration 4/5 3/5
Pancreas Inflammatory cell infiltration 3/5 1/5G7 (N-5) Liver Focal necrosis, degeneration, inflammatory cell foci 5/5 4/5
Pancreas Inflammatory cell infiltration 4/5 3/5Stomach Inflammatory cell foci, polymorphs 3/5 2/5Heart Inflammatory cell infiltration 4/5 2/5
G8 (N-50) Liver Focal necrosis, degeneration, inflammatory cell foci 4/5 4/5Pancreas Inflammatory cell infiltration 3/5 4/5Stomach Inflammatory cell foci, polymorphs 2/5 1/5Heart Inflammatory cell infiltration 3/5 2/5
G9 (N-300) Liver Focal necrosis, inflammatory cell foci 4/5 2/5Pancreas Inflammatory cell infiltration 3/5 2/5Stomach Inflammatory cell foci, polymorphs 2/5 0/5Heart Inflammatory cell infiltration 2/5 1/5
G10 (N-1000) Liver Focal necrosis, inflammatory cell foci 4/5 3/5Pancreas Inflammatory cell infiltration 3/5 3/5Stomach Inflammatory cell foci, polymorphs 2/5 1/5Heart Inflammatory cell infiltration 2/5 0/5
G11 (N-2000) Liver Focal necrosis, inflammatory cell foci 4/5 2/5Pancreas Inflammatory cell infiltration 4/5 2/5Stomach Inflammatory cell foci, polymorphs 2/5 0/5
Table 6. Incidence of histopathology lesions
GroupLivera
severity/incidencePancreasb
severity/incidenceStomachc
severity/incidenceHeartd
severity/incidence
G6 (M-2000) þþ/7e þ/4e – –G7 (N-5) þþ/9e þþ/7e þ/5e þþ/6e
G8 (N-50) þþ/8e þþ/7e þ/3e þþ/5e
G9 (N-300) þþ/6e þ/5e þ/2e þ/3e
G10 (N-1000)
þþ/7e þ/6e þ/3e þ/2e
G11 (N-2000)
þþ/6e þ/6e þ/2e –
aFocal and single-cell necrosis, degeneration, fibrous scar and inflammatory cell foci.bInflammatory cell infiltration.cInflammatory cell infiltration and polymorphs.dInflammatory cell infiltration.eIncidence observed in 10 animals/group (both sexes).
684 Toxicology and Industrial Health 28(8)
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Croteau MN, Dybowska AD, Luoma SN, and Jones EV
(2011) A novel approach reveals that zinc oxide
nanoparticles are bioavailable and toxic after dietary
exposures. Nanotoxicology 5(1): 79–90.
Dufour EK, Kumaravel T, Nohynek GJ, Kirkland D, and
Toutain H (2006) Clastogenicity, photo-clastogenicity
or pseudo-photoclastogenicity: genotoxic effects of zinc
oxide in the dark, in pre-irradiated or simultaneously
irradiated Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mutation
Research 607(2): 215–224.
Ellis G, Goldberg DM, Spooner RJ, and Ward MA (1978)
Serum enzyme tests in disease of the liver and biliary tree.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology 70(2): 248–258.
Hoet PH, Gilissen LP, Leyva M, and Nemery B (1999) In
vitro cytotoxicity of textile paint components linked to
the ‘‘Ardystil syndrome’’. Toxicological Sciences
52(2): 209–216.
Hoet PH, Gilissen L, and Nemery B (2001) Polyanions protect
against the in vitro pulmonary toxicity of polycationic
paint components associated with the Ardystil syndrome.
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 175(2): 184–190.
Hoshino A, Fujioka K, Oku T, Suga M, Sasaki YF, Ohta T,
et al. (2004) Physicochemical properties and cellular
toxicity of nanocrystal quantum dots depend on their
surface modification. Nano Letters 4: 2163–2169.
ICON (2008) Predicting Nano-Biointeractions: An Inter-
national Assessment of Nanotechnology Environment,
Health, and Safety Research Needs. Houston, TX:
International Council on Nanotechnology.
Ju-Nam Y, Lead JR (2008) Manufactured nanoparticles: an
overview of their chemistry, interactions and potential
environmental implications. The Science of the Total
Environment 400(1-3): 396–414.
Kellerman J (1995) Blood Test. Chicago, USA: Signet
Book. Reprint edition.
Kreyling WG, Semmler-Behnke M, and Moller W (2006)
Health implications of nanoparticles. Journal of Nano-
particulate Research 8: 543–562.
Luther W (2004) Technological Analysis. Industrial
Application of Nanomaterials—Chances and Risks.
Dusseldorf: Future Technologies division of VDI Techno-
logiezentrum GmbH.
Lux Research (2009) Nanomaterials State of the Market Q1
2009. New York, NY: Lux Research Inc.
Magrez A, Kasas S, Salicio V, et al. (2006) Cellular
toxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials. Nano Letters
6(6): 1121–1125.
Maynard AD (2006) Nanotechnology: A Research Strategy
for Addressing Risk. Washington, DC: Woodrow
Wilson International Center for Scholars, Project on
Emerging Nanotechnologies.
Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, et al. (2006) Safe
handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444(7117): 267–269.
Maynard AD, Kuempel ED (2005) Airborne nanostruc-
tured particles and occupational health. Journal of
Nanoparticle Research 7: 587–614.
Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, and Li N (2006) Toxic potential of
materials at the nanolevel. Science 311(5761): 622–627.
NNI (2008) Strategy for nanotechnology-related environ-
mental, health and safety research. Chicago, IL:
National Nanotechnology Initiative.
Oberdorster G (2000) Toxicology of ultrafine particles: in
vivo studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society of London Series A-Mathematical Physical and
Engineering Sciences. 358: 2719–2740.
Oberdorster G (2010) Safety assessment for nanotechnol-
ogy and nanomedicine: concepts of nanotoxicology.
Journal of Internal Medicine 267(1): 89–105.
Oberdorster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K, et al. (2005)
Principles for characterizing the potential human health
effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a
screening strategy. Fiber Toxicology 2: 8. doi:10.1186/
1743-8977-2-8.
Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, and Oberdorster J (2005)
Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from
studies of ultrafine particles. Environmental Health
Perspectives 113(7): 823–839.
PCAST (2010) Report to the President and Congress on the
Third Assessment of the National nanotechnology Initia-
tive. Washington, DC: President’s Council of Advisors
on Science and Technology.
Qiang JL (2001) The surface properties and photocatalytic
activities of ZnO ultrafine particles. Applied Surface
Science 180: 308–314.
RCEP (2008) Novel Materials in the Environment: The
Case of Nanotechnology. London, UK: Royal Commis-
sion on Environmental Pollution.
SCENIHR (2005) Scientific Committee on Emerging and
Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR): Opinion
on the Appropriateness of Existing Methodologies to
Assess the Potential Risks Associated with Engineered
and Adventitious Products of Nanotechnologies. Scien-
tific Committee on Emerging and newly Identified
Health Risks.
SCENIHR (2009) Risk Assessment of Products of
Nanotechnologies. Brussels: Scientific Committee on
Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks.
Surekha P, Sairam Kishore A, Srinivas A, Selvam G,
Goparaju A, Neelakanta Reddy P, et al. Repeated dose
dermal toxicity study of nano zinc oxide with Sprague
Dawley rats. Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology (in
press).
Pasupuleti et al. 685
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Wang B, Feng W, Wang M, Wang T, Gu Y, Zhu M, et al.
(2008) Acute toxicological impact of nano- and
submicro-scaled zinc oxide powder on healthy adult
mice. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 10: 263–276.
Wick P, Manser P, Limbach LK, et al. (2007) The degree
and kind of agglomeration affect carbon nanotube
cytotoxicity. Toxicology Letters 168(2): 121–131.
Wu C and Huanga Q (2010). Synthesis of Na-doped ZnO
nanowires and their photocatalytic properties. Journal
of Luminescence 130(11): 2136–2141.
Zook JM, MacCuspie RI, Locascio LE, Halter MD, and Elliott
JT (2011) Stable nanoparticle aggregates /agglomerates of
different size on hemolytic cytotoxicity. Nanotoxicology
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2010.536615.
686 Toxicology and Industrial Health 28(8)
at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 9, 2012tih.sagepub.comDownloaded from